scholarly journals Interference Screw Versus Suture Anchors for Femoral Fixation in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 232596712198928
Author(s):  
Heath P. Gould ◽  
Nicholas R. Delaney ◽  
Brent G. Parks ◽  
Roshan T. Melvani ◽  
Richard Y. Hinton
Keyword(s):  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Graft Fixation ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Femoral Fixation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
The Mean

Background: Femoral-sided graft fixation in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is commonly performed using an interference screw (IS). However, the IS method is associated with several clinical disadvantages that may be ameliorated by the use of suture anchors (SAs) for femoral fixation. Purpose: To compare the load to failure and stiffness of SAs versus an IS for the femoral fixation of a semitendinosus autograft in MPFL reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Based on a priori power analysis, a total of 6 matched pairs of cadaveric knees were included. Specimens in each pair were randomly assigned to receive either SA or IS fixation. After an appropriate reconstruction procedure, the looped end of the MPFL graft was pulled laterally at a rate of 6 mm/s until construct failure. The best-fit slope of the load-displacement curve was then used to calculate the stiffness (N/mm) in a post hoc fashion. A paired t test was used to compare the mean load to failure and the mean stiffness between groups. Results: No significant difference in load to failure was observed between the IS and the SA fixation groups (294.0 ± 61.1 vs 250.0 ± 55.9; P = .352), although the mean stiffness was significantly higher in IS specimens (34.5 ± 9.6 vs 14.7 ± 1.2; P = .004). All IS reconstructions failed by graft pullout from the femoral tunnel, whereas 5 of the 6 SA reconstructions failed by anchor pullout. Conclusion: In this biomechanical study using a cadaveric model of MPFL reconstruction, SA femoral fixation was not significantly different from IS fixation in terms of load to failure. The mean load-to-failure values for both reconstruction techniques were greater than the literature-reported values for the native MPFL. Clinical Relevance: These results suggest that SAs are a biomechanically viable alternative for femoral-sided graft fixation in MPFL reconstruction.

scholarly journals A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF SUTURE ANCHOR VS. INTERFERENCE SCREW TECHNIQUE FOR PATELLAR FIXATION FOR MEDIAL PATELLOFEMORAL LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0010
Author(s):  
Dragomi Mijic ◽  
Sanar Yokhana ◽  
Kunal Kalra
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
T Test ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Initial Stiffness ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Fresh Frozen

Background: There are numerous techniques for MPFL reconstruction, however, one single technique has not been proven to be superior to another. Suture anchor reconstruction has been shown to provide stable fixation while decreasing the risk of patellar fracture. The aim of the study was to compare the stiffness and clinical load to failure of two common MPFL reconstruction techniques. Our hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in the stiffness and the clinical load to failure between the suture anchor and interference screw reconstructions. Methods: Eight pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric knees were randomized into two groups undergoing MPFL reconstruction using either a suture anchor technique (n=8) or an interference screw technique (n=8). Testing was performed at 0, 30, 60, and 90 degrees of flexion for the native knee, transected medial structures, and reconstructed MPFL. Next, the reconstructed MPFL specimens were tested until failure in 0 degrees of flexion. T test, One-Way ANOVA, and repeated measures of ANOVA were used for statistical analysis, P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results: The average stiffness for the suture anchor and interference screw reconstructions was 12.02 ± 3.96 N/mm and 14.21 ± 4.20 N/mm, respectively (t test, p = 0.27), while average clinical load to failure was 256.57 ± 54.1 N and 237.81 ± 23.82 N, respectively (t test, p = 0.38). There was no significant difference in stiffness between the suture anchor and interference screw techniques at 0, 30, and 60 degrees of flexion. Conclusions: The suture anchor and interference screw reconstruction techniques produce comparable stiffness for sub-failure testing at 0 and 30 degrees of flexion. For testing to failure, the initial stiffness for both reconstruction techniques have been shown to be concordant with previously published values for the native MPFL. Both reconstruction techniques provide greater ultimate failure loads than those reported for the native MPFL in previous studies. Clinical Relevance: Suture anchor reconstruction described in our study provides another reliable option for the reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. [Figure: see text]

Anatomic and Biomechanical Properties of Flat Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using an Adductor Magnus Tendon Graft: A Human Cadaveric Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110095
Author(s):  
Danko Dan Milinkovic ◽  
Christian Fink ◽  
Christoph Kittl ◽  
Petri Silanpää ◽  
Elmar Herbst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Biomechanical Properties ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Maximum Elongation ◽  
Skeletally Immature ◽  
Femoral Insertion ◽  
Adductor Tubercle ◽  
Adductor Magnus ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
The Mean

Background: In contrast to the majority of existing techniques for reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), the technique described in this article uses the adductor magnus muscle tendon to gain a flat, broad graft, leaving its distal femoral insertion intact, and does not require drilling within or near the femoral physis. It also allows for soft tissue patellar fixation and could facilitate anatomic MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. Purpose: To evaluate the anatomic and structural properties of the native MPFL and the adductor tendon (AT), followed by biomechanical evaluation of the proposed reconstruction. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: The morphological and topographical features of the AT and MPFL were evaluated in 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. The distance between the distal insertion of the AT on the adductor tubercle and the adductor hiatus, as well as the desired length of the graft, was measured to evaluate this graft’s application potential. Load-to-failure tests were performed to determine the biomechanical properties of the proposed reconstruction construct. The construct was placed in a uniaxial testing machine and cyclically loaded 500 times between 5 and 50 N, followed by load to failure, to measure the maximum elongation, stiffness, and maximum load. Results: The mean ± SD length of the AT was 12.6 ± 1.5 cm, and the mean distance between the insertion on the adductor tubercle and adductor hiatus was 10.8 ± 1.3 cm, exceeding the mean desired length of the graft (7.5 ± 0.5 cm) by 3.3 ± 0.7 cm. The distal insertion of the AT was slightly proximal and posterior to the insertion of the MPFL. The maximum elongation after cyclical loading was 1.9 ± 0.4 mm. Ultimately, the mean stiffness and load to failure were 26.2 ± 7.6 N/mm and 169.7 ± 19.2 N, respectively. The AT graft failed at patellar fixation in 2 of the initially tested specimens and at the femoral insertion in the remaining 10. Conclusion: The described reconstruction using the AT has potential for MPFL reconstruction. The AT graft presents a graft of significant volume, beneficial anatomic topography, and adequate tensile properties in comparison with the native MPFL following the data from previously published studies. Clinical Relevance: Given its advantageous anatomic relationship as an application that avoids femoral drilling and osseous patellar fixation, the AT may be considered a graft for MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.

scholarly journals Braided tape is equivalent to modified Mason-Allen multi-strand #2 suture in subscapularis muscle repair: results of a biomechanical study

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-91
Author(s):  
Benjamin Léger-St-Jean ◽  
Jérémie Ménard ◽  
Stéphanie Hinse ◽  
Frédéric Balg ◽  
Dominique M Rouleau
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Ultimate Load ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Subscapularis Tendon ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
The Mean

Background To help determine the optimal fixation method for subscapularis tendon repair in arthroplasty, the present study compares single-passage transosseous tape (BT) and modified Mason-Allen #2 suture (MA). Methods Eighteen human cadaveric shoulders were randomized to two repair constructs after arthroplasty preparation. Both techniques included two transosseous passages through the bicipital groove and then through the tendon at the level of the anatomical neck. Construct was tested using a traction machine, measuring cyclic loading and ultimate load to failure. Results The mean age of our specimens was 71 years. No significant difference was observed between the repair techniques in both mean ultimate load and cyclic loading. The mean (SD) ultimate load (UL) for BT was 293 (84) N and 342 (117) N for MA, which was not statistically significant ( p = 0.374). The majority of repairs failed in the tendon. Bone cut-out was observed with the MA but not for the BT repair. No correlation was found between bone density and UL for BT ( r = −0.09) but there was strong correlation for MA ( r = 0.63). Conclusions The MA repair appears to be more dependant on bone mineral density for ultimate load, indicating that braided-tape might be better suited for osteoporotic patients to avoid bone cut-out.

scholarly journals Comparable outcome for autografts and allografts in primary medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellofemoral instability: systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Migliorini ◽  
Andromahi Trivellas ◽  
Jörg Eschweiler ◽  
Matthias Knobe ◽  
Markus Tingart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Patellofemoral Instability ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Feasible Alternative ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Persistent Instability

Abstract Purpose This study updates the current evidence on the role of allografts versus autografts for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability. Methods The study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. In March 2021, a literature search in the main online databases was performed. Studies reporting quantitative data concerning primary MPFL reconstruction using an allograft were considered for inclusion. The Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected articles. Results Data from 12 studies (474 procedures) were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 42.2 (15–78.5) months. The mean age was 21.1 ± 6.2 years. 64.9% (285 of 439) of patients were female. At the last follow-up, the Tegner (p < 0.0001), Kujala (p = 0.002) and the Lysholm (p < 0.0001) scores were minimally greater in the autografts. The similarity was found in the rate of persistent instability sensation and revision. The allograft group evidenced a lower rate of re-dislocations (p = 0.003). Conclusion Allografts may represent a feasible alternative to traditional autograft for MPFL reconstruction in selected patients with patellofemoral instability. Allograft tendons yielded similar PROMs, rates of persistent instability, and revision. Allograft reconstructions tended to have modestly lower re-dislocation rates. Level of evidence IV.

scholarly journals Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability: analysis of outcomes and risk factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Migliorini ◽  
Francesco Oliva ◽  
Gayle D. Maffulli ◽  
Jörg Eschweiler ◽  
Matthias Knobe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Patellofemoral Instability ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tegner Score

Abstract Background The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is always damaged after patellar dislocation. In selected patients, MPFL reconstruction is necessary to restore a correct patellar tracking. Despite the large number of different techniques reported to reconstruct the MPFL, there is no consensus concerning the optimal procedure, and debates is still ongoing. The present study analysed the results after isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis of patients presenting pathoanatomical risk factors was made. Methods In November 2020, the main electronic databases were accessed. All articles reporting the results of primary isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting a minimum 12-month follow-up were eligible. Results Data from a total of 1777 knees were collected. The mean age of the patients involved was 22.8 ± 3.4 years. The mean follow-up was 40.7 ± 25.8 months. Overall, the range of motion (+ 27.74; P < 0.0001) and all the other scores of interests improved at last follow-up: Kujala (+ 12.76; P = 0.0003), Lysholm (+ 15.69; P < 0.0001), Tegner score (+ 2.86; P = 0.006). Seventy-three of 1780 patients (4.1%) showed a positive apprehension test. Thirty of 1765 patients (1.7%) experienced re-dislocations, while 56 of 1778 patients (3.2%) showed persisting joint instability. Twenty-five of 1786 patients (1.4%) underwent revision surgeries. Conclusion Isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability provides reliable surgical outcomes. Patients with pathoanatomical predisposing factors reported worse surgical outcomes.

scholarly journals Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Femoral Tunnel Accuracy

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596711668774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie A. Hiemstra ◽  
Sarah Kerslake ◽  
Mark Lafave
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Patellofemoral Instability ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Tunnel Position ◽  
Femoral Tunnel Position ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Femoral Tunnel Placement

Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a procedure aimed to reestablish the checkrein to lateral patellar translation in patients with symptomatic patellofemoral instability. Correct femoral tunnel position is thought to be crucial to successful MPFL reconstruction, but the accuracy of this statement in terms of patient outcomes has not been tested. Purpose: To assess the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement in an MPFL reconstruction cohort and to determine the correlation between tunnel accuracy and a validated disease-specific, patient-reported quality-of-life outcome measure. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Between June 2008 and February 2014, a total of 206 subjects underwent an MPFL reconstruction. Lateral radiographs were measured to determine the accuracy of the femoral tunnel by measuring the distance from the center of the femoral tunnel to the Schöttle point. Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) scores were collected a mean 24 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 155 (79.5%) subjects had adequate postoperative lateral radiographs and complete BPII scores. The mean duration of follow-up (±SD) was 24.4 ± 8.2 months (range, 12-74 months). Measurement from the center of the femoral tunnel to the Schöttle point resulted in 143 (92.3%) tunnels being categorized as “good” or “ideal.” There were 8 failures in the cohort, none of which occurred in malpositioned tunnels. The mean distance from the center of the MPFL tunnel to the center of the Schöttle point was 5.9 ± 4.2 mm (range, 0.5-25.9 mm). The mean postoperative BPII score was 65.2 ± 22.5 (range, 9.2-100). Pearson r correlation demonstrated no statistically significant relationship between accuracy of femoral tunnel position and BPII score ( r = –0.08; 95% CI, –0.24 to 0.08). Conclusion: There was no evidence of a correlation between the accuracy of MPFL reconstruction femoral tunnel in relation to the Schöttle point and disease-specific quality-of-life scores. Graft failure was not related to femoral tunnel placement. The patellofemoral instability population is complex, and patients present with multiple risk factors that, in addition to the accuracy of femoral tunnel position, contribute to quality of life and warrant further investigation.

The Peroneal Groove Deepening Procedure: A Biomechanical Study of Pressure Reduction

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 442-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig I. Title ◽  
Hung-Geun Jung ◽  
Brent G. Parks ◽  
Lew C. Schon
Keyword(s):  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Posterior Tibial Tendon ◽  
Peroneal Tendon ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Calcaneofibular Ligament ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mean Pressure ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pressure Changes

Background: The goal of this study was to identify pressure changes throughout the peroneal groove after a groove deepening procedure. We hypothesized that pressures would decrease. Methods: Twelve fresh-frozen foot and ankle specimens were used. A thin pressure strip containing four sensor pads was secured within the peroneal groove with pads 1 through 4 positioned at the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and at the distal, middle, and proximal groove, respectively. The midstance phase of gait was simulated with loads applied to the plantar foot and posterior tibial tendon and to the peroneus longus and brevis tendons. Pressures were recorded with the ankle in neutral, plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, inversion, and eversion. Groove deepening was done by osteotomizing the posterior fibular wall. Pressure readings were then recorded. Average pressures for each of the four sensor pads after the procedure were compared to those obtained before the procedure. Results: The mean pressure overlying the CFL increased at all five ankle positions; however, these changes were not significant. Significant decreases in pressure were noted within the distal and middle groove at all ankle positions after the peroneal groove deepening procedure. Pressure within the proximal groove increased at all but one position, with a significant difference noted in neutral and plantarflexion. Conclusion: Pressures within the middle and distal peroneal groove significantly decreased after a groove deepening procedure. Combining this technique with peroneal tendon debridement may be advantageous for treatment of partial peroneal tendon tears or recalcitrant peroneal tendinitis.

Ability of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction to Overcome Lateral Patellar Motion in the Presence of Trochlear Flattening: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110410
Author(s):  
Amrit V. Vinod ◽  
Alex M. Hollenberg ◽  
Melissa A. Kluczynski ◽  
John M. Marzo
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Trochlear Groove ◽  
Sulcus Angle ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Patellar Stability

Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is an established operative procedure to restore medial restraining force in patients with patellar instability. In the setting of a shallow sulcus, it is unclear whether an isolated MPFL reconstruction is sufficient to restore patellofemoral stability. Hypothesis: Progressively increasing the sulcus angle would have an adverse effect on the ability of an MPFL reconstruction to restrain lateral patellar motion. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were harvested and prepared for experimentation. Each specimen was run through the following test conditions: native, lateral retinacular release, lateral retinacular repair, MPFL release, MPFL reconstruction, and MPFL reconstruction with trochlear flattening. Four 3-dimensional printed wedges (10°, 20°, 30°, and 40°) were created to insert beneath the native trochlea to raise the sulcus angle incrementally and simulate progressive trochlear flattening. For each test condition, the knee was positioned at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° of flexion, and the force required to displace the patella 1 cm laterally at 10 mm/s was measured. Group comparisons were made with repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: In the setting of an MPFL reconstruction, as the trochlear groove was incrementally flattened, the force required to laterally displace the patella progressively decreased. A 10° increase in the sulcus angle significantly reduced the force at 15° ( P = .01) and 30° ( P = .03) of knee flexion. The force required to laterally displace the patella was also significantly lower at all knee flexion angles after the addition of the 20°, 30°, and 40° wedges ( P≤ .05). Specifically, a 20° increase in the sulcus angle reduced the force by 29% to 36%; a 30° increase, by 35% to 43%; and a 40° increase, by 40% to 47%. Conclusion: Despite an MPFL reconstruction, the force required to laterally displace the patella decreased as the sulcus angle was increased in our cadaveric model. Clinical Relevance: An isolated MPFL reconstruction may not be sufficient to restore patellar stability in the setting of a shallow or flat trochlea. Patients with an abnormal sulcus angle may have recurrent instability postoperatively if treated with an isolated MPFL reconstruction.

scholarly journals Biomechanical Evaluation of Proximal Hamstring Repair: All-Suture Anchor Versus Titanium Suture Anchor

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596711989292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Otto ◽  
Alyssa M. DiCosmo ◽  
Joshua B. Baldino ◽  
Julian Mehl ◽  
Elifho Obopilwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Optical Tracking ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Posterior Aspect ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Proximal Hamstring

Background: Proximal hamstring avulsions are severe tendon injuries and are commonly sports-related. Open and endoscopic techniques as well as different anchor configurations have already been described for proximal hamstring repair. Novel all-suture anchors have been developed to provide decreased bone loss during placement and reduced occupied bone volume when compared with titanium suture anchors. Hypothesis: Complete proximal hamstring avulsions repaired with all-suture anchors will demonstrate equal load to failure and comparable displacement under cyclic loading when compared with titanium suture anchors. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Complete proximal hamstring avulsions were created in 18 paired cadaveric specimens (mean ± SD age, 63.0 ± 10.4 years). Either all-suture anchors or titanium suture anchors were used for repair. Cyclic loading from 10 to 125 N at 1 Hz was performed for 1500 cycles with a material testing machine. Displacement was assessed along anterior and posterior aspects of the tendon repair with optical tracking. Specimens were loaded to failure at a rate of 120 mm/min. Displacement, load to failure, and repair construct stiffness were compared between matched pairs with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Correlations were determined by Spearman rho analysis. Results: The all-suture anchors showed significantly higher load-to-failure values when compared with the titanium anchor repairs (799.64 ± 257.1 vs 573.27 ± 89.9 N; P = .008). There was no significant difference in displacement between all-suture anchors and titanium suture anchors at the anterior aspect (6.60 ± 2.2 vs 5.49 ± 1.1 mm; P = .26) or posterior aspect (5.87 ± 2.08 vs 5.23 ± 1.37 mm; P = .678) of the repaired hamstring tendons. Conclusion: All-suture anchors demonstrated similar displacement and superior load to failure when compared with titanium suture anchors. Clinical Relevance: The results of this study suggest that all-suture anchors are an equivalent alternative to titanium suture anchors for proximal hamstring avulsion repair.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document