scholarly journals Outcomes of Hindfoot and Ankle Arthrodesis in Neuropathic Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0028
Author(s):  
David Macknet ◽  
Andrew Wohler ◽  
Carroll P. Jones ◽  
J. Kent Ellington ◽  
Bruce E. Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ankle Arthrodesis ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Hardware Failure ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Fixation Group

Category: Ankle Arthritis, Diabetes, Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: Charcot neuropathy of the ankle and hindfoot is a progressive and destructive process that can lead to instability and ulceration resulting in significant morbidity which can end with amputation. The foot and ankle surgeon’s aim is to reconstruct the high risk foot with the creation of a stable plantigrade foot, while reducing the risk of ulceration and allowing the patient to mobilize in commercially available footwear. There are numerous techniques for the reconstruction of the neuropathic hindfoot, but the most utilized of these include multiplanar external fixation or internal fixation with a plate or intramedullary nail. It is our goal to further elucidate outcomes of Charcot patients undergoing corrective ankle and hindfoot fusion comparing internal versus external fixation. Methods: We retrospectively collected 377 patients undergoing hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis at our institution from 2006- 2017. 77 patients were identified that underwent arthrodesis for Charcot arthropathy, 56 of which met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. This included 47 who had internal fixation as their primary procedure and 9 patients who underwent external fixation with a multi-planar external fixator. Our median follow up time was 3.4 years (IQR .5 to 12.9). Preoperatively we collected basic demographic variables, reasons for neuropathy, and ulcer status. Postoperatively we collected complications including infection, hardware failure, ulceration, recurrent deformity, and radiographic outcomes including union and hardware backout. Reoperation numbers and indications were also collected. Our primary outcome was limb salvage at final follow up. Secondarily, we collected final ambulatory and footwear status. Results: The limb salvage rate was 82% with 10 patients undergoing amputation, which did not vary between groups (p=.99). The primary reasons for amputation were persistent infection (4 of 10) and nonunion (4 of 10). Thirteen (24%) patients developed an infection. The median number of reoperations per patient was 1 (IQR 0-2) with the patients who underwent amputation undergoing a median of 2 (IQR 2-4) reoperations. The rate of union was 54%, occurring at a median of 26.5 (IQR 12-47) months. 44% (4/9) of patients in the external fixation group had a preoperative ulceration versus 19% (9/47) of the patients in the internal fixation group (p=.19). Preoperative ulceration was not a risk factor for amputation. Forty-two (75%) patients were ambulatory at final follow up. Conclusion: We report on the single largest series of Charcot patients undergoing hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis. The surgical management of this population has a high rate of complications with infection and reoperation being common. Despite a high nonunion rate most patients are able to ambulate in a brace or orthotic. Limb salvage can be expected with either internal or external fixation techniques.

scholarly journals Complication Rates in Ankle and Hindfoot Charcot Arthropathy Treated with Arthrodesis

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0034
Author(s):  
David M. Macknet ◽  
Andrew Wohler ◽  
Bruce E. Cohen ◽  
J. Kent Ellington ◽  
Carroll P. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Ankle Arthrodesis ◽  
Limb Salvage Rate ◽  
Charcot Arthropathy ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Radiographic Union ◽  
Salvage Rate

Category: Diabetes; Ankle; Hindfoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: Charcot arthropathy of the ankle and hindfoot is a progressive and destructive process that can lead to instability and ulceration resulting in significant morbidity. When indicated, the surgical goals are to restore a stable plantigrade foot, reduce the risk of ulceration, and improve function to independent ambulation. Techniques for reconstruction of the neuropathic ankle/hindfoot include external and/or internal fixation. Current literature involving small series of surgical patients has shown a high rate of limb salvage and low complication rate. Our experience has been less promising, although we believe it remains a viable option. It is our goal to report the outcomes of Charcot patients undergoing corrective ankle and hindfoot reconstruction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 377 patients undergoing hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis at our institution from 2006- 2017. 77 patients were identified that underwent arthrodesis for Charcot arthropathy, 51 of which met inclusion and exclusion criteria with a minimum one year follow up. 42 had internal fixation as their primary procedure (plate or nail) and 9 patients underwent external fixation with a multi-planar external fixator. Median follow up time was 4 years (IQR 2.97 years). Preoperatively, basic demographic variables, etiology of neuropathy, ulcer status, radiographic measurements, Brodsky classification, and presence of a viable talus were collected and analyzed. Postoperatively, we collected complications including infection, hardware failure, ulceration, recurrent deformity, and nonunion. Reoperation numbers and indications for reoperation were also collected. The primary outcome measure was limb salvage at final follow up. Secondary outcome measures were ambulatory and footwear/bracing status. Results: 11 patients (20%) underwent amputation at final follow up and 26 (47.3%) achieved radiographic union, both of which did not vary by fixation type (p=0.67 and p=0.88). The primary reasons for amputation were persistent infection and non-union. 74.5% of patients developed a post-operative complication and 58.2% had at least one reoperation. 25.5% of patients developed a post- operative infection. Patients with a pre-operative ulceration were more likely to undergo external fixation (p=0.02), but amputation rates did not differ between groups (p>0.99). There was a trend toward increased risk of post-operative infection in the ulceration group (p=0.07). A pre-operative Meary’s angle >25° was more likely to undergo amputation (p=0.04) and less likely to achieve radiographic union (p=0.05). 75.9% of patients were ambulatory at final follow up. Conclusion: Our rates of amputation (20%), post-operative infection (25%), complications (74.5%) and non-union (52%) are higher than previously described. Previous literature has described a near 100% limb salvage rate, but in our report on a large series of Charcot patients undergoing hindfoot/ankle arthrodesis we describe an 80% limb salvage rate. Pre-operative Meary’s angle >25° was predictive of treatment failure.

Two-stage reconstruction of infected Charcot foot using internal fixation

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (10) ◽  
pp. 1611-1618
Author(s):  
Venu Kavarthapu ◽  
Basil Budair
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Surgical Reconstruction ◽  
Charcot Foot ◽  
Foot Deformity ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Infected Nonunion ◽  
Hardware Failure

Aims In our unit, we adopt a two-stage surgical reconstruction approach using internal fixation for the management of infected Charcot foot deformity. We evaluate our experience with this functional limb salvage method. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all patients with infected Charcot foot deformity who underwent two-stage reconstruction with internal fixation between July 2011 and November 2019, with a minimum of 12 months’ follow-up. Results We identified 23 feet in 22 patients with a mean age of 56.7 years (33 to 70). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 44.7 months (14 to 99). Limb salvage was achieved in all patients. At one-year follow-up, all ulcers have healed and independent full weightbearing mobilization was achieved in all but one patient. Seven patients developed new mechanical skin breakdown; all went on to heal following further interventions. Fusion of the hindfoot was achieved in 15 of 18 feet (83.3%). Midfoot fusion was achieved in nine of 15 patients (60%) and six had stable and painless fibrous nonunion. Hardware failure occurred in five feet, all with broken dorsomedial locking plate. Six patients required further surgery, two underwent revision surgery for infected nonunion, two for removal of metalwork and exostectomy, and two for dynamization of the hindfoot nail. Conclusion Two-stage reconstruction of the infected and deformed Charcot foot using internal fixation and following the principle of ‘long-segment, rigid and durable internal fixation, with optimal bone opposition and local antibiotic elusion’ is a good form of treatment provided a multidisciplinary care plan is delivered. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(10):1611–1618.

Clinical Value of Computer-Assisted Taylor Three-dimensional External Fixation in the Treatment of Tibiofibular Fracture (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongfeng Sheng ◽  
Weixing Xu ◽  
Bin Xu ◽  
Hongpu Song ◽  
Di Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
External Fixator ◽  
Theoretical Basis ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Clinical Value

UNSTRUCTURED The retrospective study of Taylor's three-dimensional external fixator for the treatment of tibiofibular fractures provides a theoretical basis for the application of this technology. The paper collected 28 patients with tibiofibular fractures from the Department of Orthopaedics in our hospital from March 2015 to June 2018. After the treatment, the follow-up evaluation of Taylor's three-dimensional external fixator for the treatment of tibiofibular fractures and concurrency the incidence of the disease, as well as the efficacy and occurrence of the internal fixation of the treatment of tibial fractures in our hospital. The results showed that Taylor's three-dimensional external fixator was superior to orthopaedics in the treatment of tibiofibular fractures in terms of efficacy and complications. To this end, the thesis research can be concluded as follows: Taylor three-dimensional external fixation in the treatment of tibiofibular fractures is more effective, and the incidence of occurrence is low, is a new technology for the treatment of tibiofibular fractures, it is worthy of clinical promotion.

Outcomes after Emergency Admission with a Diabetic Foot Attack Indicate a High Rate of Healing and Limb Salvage But Increased Mortality: 18-Month Follow-up Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Vainieri ◽  
Raju Ahluwalia ◽  
Hani Slim ◽  
Daina Walton ◽  
Chris Manu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Emergency Admission ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Major Amputation ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Abstract Aim The diabetic foot attack (DFA) is perhaps the most devastating form of diabetic foot infection, presenting with rapidly progressive skin and tissue necrosis, threatening both limb and life. However, clinical outcome data in this specific group of patients are not available. Methods Analysis of 106 consecutive patients who underwent emergency hospitalisation for DFA (TEXAS Grade 3B or 3D and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Class 4 criteria). Outcomes evaluated were: 1) Healing 2) major amputation 3) death 4) not healed. The first outcome reached in one of these four categories over the follow-up period (18.4±3.6 months) was considered. We also estimated amputation free survival. Results Overall, 57.5% (n=61) healed, 5.6% (n=6) underwent major amputation, 23.5% (n=25) died without healing and 13.2% (n=14) were alive without healing. Predictive factors associated with outcomes were: Healing (age<60, p=0.0017; no Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) p= 0.002; not on dialysis p=0.006); major amputation (CRP>100 mg/L, p=0.001; gram+ve organisms, p=0.0013; dialysis, p= 0.001), and for death (age>60, p= 0.0001; gram+ve organisms p=0.004; presence of PAD, p=0.0032; CRP, p=0.034). The major amputation free survival was 71% during the first 12 months from admission, however it had reduced to 55.4% by the end of the follow-up period. Conclusions In a unique population of hospitalised individuals with DFA, we report excellent healing and limb salvage rates using a dedicated protocol in a multidisciplinary setting. An additional novel finding was the concerning observation that such an admission was associated with high 18-month mortality, almost all of which was after discharge from hospital.

scholarly journals Functional results after operative treatment of talus fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Andreja Gavrilovski ◽  
Aleksandra Gavrilovska-Dimovska ◽  
Goran Aleksovski
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis ◽  
Anatomic Reduction ◽  
Aseptic Osteonecrosis ◽  
The University ◽  
With Screws

Fractures of the talus do not occur frequently, accounting for about 0.1% of all fractures. Failure to achieve anatomic reduction, exponentially increases the risk of postoperative aseptic osteonecrosis and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the short-term and medium-term functional outcomes in patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of talus fractures. Materials and methods: At the University Clinic for Traumatology in the period between 2017 to 2020, 14 patients with talus fractures were surgically treated. The inclusion and exclusion factors were determined, all patients signed the consent and the study passed the ethics committee. Results: All patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation with screws or reconstructive plate. Follow-up was done on the 14th postoperative day, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month. At the 6th month follow-up, the functional outcome was tested using the Kitaoka score unified by the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society. This injury is too rare for conclusions to be brought out of and to be compared to larger studies. However, all major studies from reference trauma centers lead to the same conclusions, that the treatment of these fractures is complex Anatomical reduction is mandatory for a better outcome. Conclusion: A protocol for the treatment of posttraumatic osteoarthritis should be introduced, given the high rate of its occurrence despite the satisfactory surgical technique.

scholarly journals Four-rod Technique Stabilization after Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy (PSO) for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Hyperkyphosis Secondary to Pott Disease: A Two-Year Follow-Up Case Report

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (03) ◽  
pp. 219-226
Author(s):  
Alecio Cristino Evangelista Santos Barcelos ◽  
Sterphany Ohana Soares Azevedo Pinto ◽  
Thaise Ellen de Moura Agra Teixeira ◽  
Rayana Ellen Fernandes Nicolau
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Hardware Failure ◽  
Sf 36

AbstractPedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a powerful tool for the management of sagittal misalignment. However, this procedure has a high rate of implant failure, particularly rod breakages. The four-rod technique diminishes this complication in the lumbar spine. The aim of the present study is to provide a case report regarding PSO and four-rod technique stabilization in the treatment of short-angle hyperkyphosis in the thoracolumbar (TL) junction. The authors describe the case of a patient with TL hyperkyphosis secondary to spinal tuberculosis treated with L1 PSO and fixation with a four-rod technique. There were no major surgical complications. The self-reported quality of life questionnaires (the Short-Form Health Survey 36 [SF-36] and the Oswestry disability index) and radiological parameters were assessed preoperatively, as well as 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, and they showed considerable and sustained improvements in pain control and quality of life. No hardware failure was observed at the two-year follow-up.

scholarly journals Limited Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Calcaneal Fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne K. Bremer ◽  
Lukas Kraler ◽  
Lars Frauchiger ◽  
Fabian G. Krause ◽  
Martin Weber
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Calcaneal Fractures ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Level Of Evidence

Background: The treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures remains a challenge and the optimal approach is still controversial. The main reason to avoid the extended lateral approach is the high complication rate due to wound healing problems. We report on 16 years of experience with a standardized limited open reduction and internal fixation technique. Methods: Between 2001 and 2017, we prospectively followed 240 consecutive patients operatively treated for a displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture. Patients with open, multiple, bilateral, extra-articular, and Sanders IV fractures and those lost to follow-up were excluded. A lateral subtalar approach was used, with a cast for 8 weeks and full weightbearing allowed after 12 weeks. Follow-up examinations were scheduled until 24 months. Subjective and clinical assessment included gait abnormality, subtalar and ankle range of motion, and stability and alignment. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score was calculated. Alignment was analyzed on standard radiographs. In total, 131 patients were excluded. The remaining 109 patients were followed for a minimum of 24 months (34.4 ± 14.2 [range, 24-102] months). Results: The mean AOFAS score was 87 ± 13 (range, 32-100). “Excellent” and “good” results, as well as hindfoot motion with “normal/mild” and “moderate” restrictions, were seen in 80% of patients. Early reoperations were performed for insufficient reduction (2 patients), delayed wound healing (debridement, 3 patients), and hematoma (1 patient). Late revisions were arthrodesis (3 patients), medializing calcaneal osteotomy (1 patient), and implant removal (53 patients; 49%). Conclusion: The presented approach has remained unmodified for 16 years and resulted in consistently good functional results. The main disadvantage was the high rate of heel screw removal. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

scholarly journals Functional and radiological outcomes in displaced heel fractures: Open reduction and internal fixation versus external fixation

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiano Ortu ◽  
Matteo Brusoni ◽  
Francesco Pisanu ◽  
Gianfilippo Caggiari ◽  
Emanuele Ciurlia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Fast Learning ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Heel Fractures ◽  
Complications Rate

Management of intra-articular heel fractures is controversial. The main goals of surgical treatment are restoring subtalar articular congruence and width, height, form and alignment of the heel. The gold standard is considered Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF), a complex technique with a high rate of complications. External Fixation (EF) could be a good alternative. In this study were identified 37 fractures in 35 patients (24 patients underwent ORIF and EF was performed in 13 cases) and the outcomes of the two techniques were compared. The mean surgical time for ORIF was 107.8 minutes, while for EF was 88.61 minutes and the ORIF group presented a higher rate of complications, despite of similar results in the mean postoperative AOFAS Ankle and Hindfoot Scale scores (73.31/100 points in the ORIF group and 75.40/100 points in the EF group). Fast learning curve, short surgery time and low complications rate make EF an alternative to ORIF in treating intraarticular heel fractures.

Staged distraction osteogenesis followed by arthrodesis using internal fixation as a form of surgical treatment for complex conditions of the ankle

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (6) ◽  
pp. 755-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
T-F. Lou ◽  
M. Hamushan ◽  
H. Li ◽  
C-Y. Wang ◽  
Y. Chai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tract Infection ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Fixation Index ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pin Tract Infection

AimsThe aim of this study was to describe the technique of distraction osteogenesis followed by arthrodesis using internal fixation to manage complex conditions of the ankle, and to present the results of this technique.Patients and MethodsBetween 2008 and 2014, distraction osteogenesis followed by arthrodesis using internal fixation was performed in 12 patients with complex conditions of the ankle due to trauma or infection. There were eight men and four women: their mean age was 35 years (23 to 51) at the time of surgery. Bone healing and functional recovery were evaluated according to the criteria described by Paley. Function was assessed using the ankle-hindfoot scale of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS).ResultsA solid fusion of the ankle and eradication of infection was achieved in all patients. A mean lengthening of 6.1 cm (2.5 to 14) was achieved at a mean follow-up of 25.2 months (14 to 37). The mean external fixation index (EFI) was 42 days/cm (33.3 to 58). The function was judged to be excellent in six patients and good in six patients. Bone results were graded as excellent in ten patients and good in two patients. The mean AOFAS score was 37.3 (5 to 77) preoperatively and 75.3 (61 to 82) at the final follow-up. Minor complications, which were treated conservatively, included pain, pin-tract infection, loosening of wires, and midfoot stiffness. Major complications, which were treated surgically included grade V pin-tract infection with inflammation and osteolysis, poor consolidation of the regenerate bone, and soft-tissue invagination. The reoperations required to treat the major complications included the exchange of pins and wires, bone grafting and invagination split surgery.ConclusionThe technique of distraction osteogenesis followed by arthrodesis using internal fixation is an effective form of treatment for the management of complex conditions of the ankle. It offers a high rate of union, an opportunity to remove the frame early, and a reduced EFI without infection or wound dehiscence. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:755–60.

scholarly journals Comparison of Monolateral External Fixation and Internal Fixation for Skeletal Stabilisation in the Management of Small Tibial Bone Defects following Successful Treatment of Chronic Osteomyelitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yicun Wang ◽  
Hui Jiang ◽  
Zhantao Deng ◽  
Jiewen Jin ◽  
Jia Meng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Bone Defect ◽  
Fasting Blood Glucose ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Systemic Antibiotics ◽  
Time Since Injury ◽  
Small Bone

Background. To compare the salvage rate and complication between internal fixation and external fixation in patients with small bone defects caused by chronic infectious osteomyelitis debridement. Methods. 125 patients with chronic infectious osteomyelitis of tibia fracture who underwent multiple irrigation, debridement procedure, and local/systemic antibiotics were enrolled. Bone defects, which were less than 4 cm, were treated with bone grafting using either internal fixation or monolateral external fixation. 12-month follow-up was conducted with an interval of 3 months to evaluate union of bone defect. Results. Patients who underwent monolateral external fixation had higher body mass index and fasting blood glucose, longer time since injury, and larger bone defect compared with internal fixation. No significant difference was observed in incidence of complications (23.5% versus 19.3%), surgery time (156±23 minutes versus 162±21 minutes), and time to union (11.1±3.0 months versus 10.9±3.1 months) between external fixation and internal fixation. Internal fixation had no significant influence on the occurrence of postoperation complications after multivariate adjustment when compared with external fixation. Furthermore, patients who underwent internal fixation experienced higher level of daily living scales and lower level of anxiety. Conclusions. It was relatively safe to use internal fixation for stabilization in osteomyelitis patients whose bone defects were less than 4 cm and infection was well controlled.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document