scholarly journals Visual Analog Pain Scores Reported to a Nurse and a Physician in a Postoperative Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 247301142094850
Author(s):  
Trevor J. McBride ◽  
Aaron Wilke ◽  
Jamie Chisholm ◽  
Kevin D. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Prior Literature ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Postoperative Setting

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative foot and ankle patient-reported visual analog pain scores (VAS) to nursing staff and the treating surgeon during a single encounter. Prior literature established preoperative patients reported higher pain scores to a surgeon as compared to nursing staff. We hypothesized that there will be no differences in postoperative patients’ pain scores when reporting to nursing staff vs a surgeon. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort of 201 consecutive postoperative foot and ankle patients with 3 follow-up encounters treated by a single surgeon. The patients were asked to rate their pain intensity using the VAS with 0 “no pain” and 10 “worst pain” at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively by a nurse and surgeon. Results: At all time intervals, the mean pain score was significantly higher when reported to the surgeon, although these were not clinically relevant. The mean scores at 2 weeks were 2.8 reported to the surgeon and 2.5 reported to the nurse ( P < .001). The mean scores at 6 weeks were 2.0 reported to the surgeon and 1.8 reported to the nurse ( P = .002). The mean scores at 12 weeks were 2.3 reported to the surgeon and 2.0 reported to the nurse ( P = .005). Conclusion: This study found that postoperative foot and ankle patients did not overemphasize their VAS pain scores to the physician vs nursing staff. These findings contrast with our 2 previous studies that found preoperative and nonoperative patients reported clinically significant higher scores to the surgeon. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study.

scholarly journals Comparison of Visual Analog Pain Score Reported to Physician vs Nurse in Nonoperatively Treated Foot and Ankle Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1444-1448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Martin ◽  
Trevor McBride ◽  
Jeffrey Wake ◽  
Jeffrey Preston Van Buren ◽  
Cuyler Dewar
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are taking a more prominent role in orthopedics as health care seeks to define treatment outcomes. The visual analog scale (VAS) is considered a reliable measure of acute pain. A previous study found that operative candidates’ VAS pain score was significantly higher when reported to the surgeon compared to the nurse. This study’s aim is to examine whether this phenomenon occurs in patients that do not undergo an operative procedure. We hypothesized that patients’ VAS pain scores reported to the surgeon vs the nurse would be the same. Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort of 201 consecutive nonoperative foot and ankle patients treated by a single surgeon. Patients were asked to rate pain intensity by a nurse followed by the surgeon using a horizontal VAS, 0 “no pain” to 10 “worst pain.” Differences in reported pain levels were compared with data from the previous cohort of 201 consecutive operative foot and ankle patients. Results: The mean VAS score reported to the nurse was 3.2 whereas the mean VAS score reported to the surgeon was 4.2 ( P < .001). The mean difference in VAS scores reported for operative patients was 2.9, whereas the mean difference for nonoperative patients was 1.0 ( P < .001). Conclusion: This study found statistically significant differences between VAS pain scores reported to the surgeon vs the nurse in nonoperative patients. These results support the trend found in our previous study, where operative patients reported significantly higher pain scores to the surgeon vs the nurse. The mean difference between reported pain scores was significantly higher for operative patients compared to nonoperative patients. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study.

scholarly journals PROMIS and FAAM Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Foot and Ankle Orthopedics

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man Hung ◽  
Judith F. Baumhauer ◽  
Frank W. Licari ◽  
Maren W. Voss ◽  
Jerry Bounsanga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Minimum Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Diagnostic Study ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Meaningful Change ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Level I

Background: Establishing score points that reflect meaningful change from the patient perspective is important for interpreting patient-reported outcomes. This study estimated the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) values of 2 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Sports subscale within a foot and ankle orthopedic population. Methods: Patients seen for foot and ankle conditions at an orthopedic clinic were administered the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) v1.2, the PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) v1.1, and the FAAM Sports at baseline and all follow-up visits. MCID estimation was conducted using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Results: A total of 3069 patients, mean age of 51 years (range = 18-94), were included. The MCIDs for the PROMIS PF ranged from approximately 3 to 30 points (median = 11.3) depending on the methods being used. The MCIDs ranged from 3 to 25 points (median = 8.9) for the PROMIS PI, and from 9 to 77 points (median = 32.5) for the FAAM Sports. Conclusions: This study established a range of MCIDs in the PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, and FAAM Sports indicating meaningful change in patient condition. MCID values were consistent across follow-up periods, but were different across methods. Values below the 25th percentile of MCIDs may be useful for low-risk clinical decisions. Midrange values (eg, near the median) should be used for high stakes decisions in clinical practice (ie, surgery referrals). The MCID values within the interquartile range should be utilized for most decision making. Level of Evidence: Level I, diagnostic study, testing of previously developed diagnostic measure on consecutive patients with reference standard applied.

scholarly journals Responsiveness of the PROMIS and FAAM Instruments in Foot and Ankle Orthopedic Population

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man Hung ◽  
Judith F. Baumhauer ◽  
Frank W. Licari ◽  
Jerry Bounsanga ◽  
Maren W. Voss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Test ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Paired Samples ◽  
Level Ii ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Ability Measure

Background: Investigating the responsiveness of an instrument is important in order to provide meaningful interpretation of clinical outcomes. This study examined the responsiveness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF), the PROMIS Pain Interference (PI), and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Sports subscale in an orthopedic sample with foot and ankle ailments. Methods: Patients presenting to an orthopedic foot and ankle clinic during the years 2014–2017 responded to the PROMIS and FAAM instruments prior to their clinical appointments. The responsiveness of the PROMIS PF v1.2, PROMIS PI v1.1, and FAAM Sports were assessed using paired samples t test, effect size (ES), and standardized response mean (SRM) at 4 different follow-up points. A total of 785 patients with an average age of 52 years (SD = 17) were included. Results: The PROMIS PF had ESs of 0.95 to 1.22 across the 4 time points (3, >3, 6, and <6 months) and SRMs of 1.04 to 1.43. The PROMIS PI had ESs of 1.04 to 1.63 and SRMs of 1.17 to 1.23. For the FAAM Sports, the ESs were 1.25 to 1.31 and SRMs were 1.07 to 1.20. The ability to detect changes via paired samples t test provided mixed results. But in general, the patients with improvement had statistically significant improved scores, and the worsening patients had statistically significant worse scores. Conclusion: The PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, and FAAM Sports were sensitive and responsive to changes in patient-reported health. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Arthroscopic ligament-specific repair for triangular fibrocartilage complex foveal avulsions: a minimum 2-year follow-up study

2020 ◽  
pp. 175319342095790
Author(s):  
Bo Liu ◽  
Margareta Arianni ◽  
Feiran Wu
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex ◽  
Wrist Flexion ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Triangular Fibrocartilage ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Viable Method

This study reports the arthroscopic ligament-specific repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) that anatomically restores both the volar and dorsal radioulnar ligaments into their individual foveal footprints. Twenty-five patients underwent arthroscopic ligament-specific repair with clinical and radiological diagnoses of TFCC foveal avulsions. The mean age was 28 years (range 14–47) and the mean follow-up was 31 months (range 24–47). Following arthroscopic assessment, 20 patients underwent double limb radioulnar ligament repairs and five had single limb repairs. At final follow-up, there were significant improvements in wrist flexion–extension, forearm pronation–supination and grip strength. There were also significant improvements in pain and patient-reported outcomes as assessed by the patient-rated wrist evaluation, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and modified Mayo wrist scores. Arthroscopic ligament-specific repair of the TFCC does not require specialist dedicated equipment or consumables and offers a viable method of treating these injuries. Level of evidence: IV

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of the Salto Talaris Total Ankle Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1519-1528
Author(s):  
Jonathan Day ◽  
Jaeyoung Kim ◽  
Martin J. O’Malley ◽  
Constantine A. Demetracopoulos ◽  
Jonathan Garfinkel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Component Revision

Background: The Salto Talaris is a fixed-bearing implant first approved in the US in 2006. While early surgical outcomes have been promising, mid- to long-term survivorship data are limited. The aim of this study was to present the survivorship and causes of failure of the Salto Talaris implant, with functional and radiographic outcomes. Methods: Eighty-seven prospectively followed patients who underwent total ankle arthroplasty with the Salto Talaris between 2007 and 2015 at our institution were retrospectively identified. Of these, 82 patients (85 ankles) had a minimum follow-up of 5 (mean, 7.1; range, 5-12) years. The mean age was 63.5 (range, 42-82) years and the mean body mass index was 28.1 (range, 17.9-41.2) kg/m2. Survivorship was determined by incidence of revision, defined as removal/exchange of a metal component. Preoperative, immediate, and minimum 5-year postoperative AP and lateral weightbearing radiographs were reviewed; tibiotalar alignment (TTA) and the medial distal tibial angle (MDTA) were measured to assess coronal talar and tibial alignment, respectively. The sagittal tibial angle (STA) was measured; the talar inclination angle (TIA) was measured to evaluate for radiographic subsidence of the implant, defined as a change in TIA of 5 degrees or more from the immediately to the latest postoperative lateral radiograph. The locations of periprosthetic cysts were documented. Preoperative and minimum 5-year postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) subscales were compared. Results: Survivorship was 97.6% with 2 revisions. One patient underwent tibial and talar component revision for varus malalignment of the ankle; another underwent talar component revision for aseptic loosening and subsidence. The rate of other reoperations was 21.2% ( n = 18), with the main reoperation being exostectomy with debridement for ankle impingement ( n = 12). At final follow-up, the average TTA improved 4.4 (± 3.8) degrees, the average MDTA improved 3.4 (± 2.6) degrees, and the average STA improved 5.3 (± 4.5) degrees. Periprosthetic cysts were observed in 18 patients, and there was no radiographic subsidence. All FAOS subscales demonstrated significant improvement at final follow-up. Conclusions: We found the Salto Talaris implant to be durable, consistent with previous studies of shorter follow-up lengths. We observed significant improvement in radiographic alignment as well as patient-reported clinical outcomes at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing to the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure

2020 ◽  
pp. 107110072097266
Author(s):  
Joseph T. O’Neil ◽  
Otho R. Plummer ◽  
Steven M. Raikin
Keyword(s):  
Computerized Adaptive Testing ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Adaptive Testing ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ability Measure ◽  
The Impact

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures are an increasingly important tool for assessing the impact of treatments orthopedic surgeons render. Despite their importance, they can present a burden. We examined the validity and utility of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) method to reduce the number of questions on the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), a validated anatomy-specific outcome measure. Methods: A previously developed FAAM CAT system was applied to the responses of patients undergoing foot and ankle evaluation and treatment over a 3-year period (2017-2019). A total of 15 902 responses for the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscale and a total of 14 344 responses for the Sports subscale were analyzed. The accuracy of the CAT to replicate the full-form score was assessed. Results: The CAT system required 11 questions to be answered for the ADL subscale in 85.1% of cases (range, 11-12). The number of questions answered on the Sports subscale was 6 (range, 5-6) in 66.4% of cases. The mean difference between the full FAAM ADL subscale and CAT was 0.63 of a point. The mean difference between the FAAM Sports subscale and CAT was 0.65 of a point. Conclusion: The FAAM CAT was able to reduce the number of responses a patient would need to answer by nearly 50%, while still providing a valid outcome score. This measure can therefore be directly correlated with previously obtained full FAAM scores in addition to providing a foot/ankle-specific measure, which previously reported CAT systems are not able to do. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

scholarly journals Capitolunate Arthrodesis versus Four-corner Arthrodesis in Scaphoin Nonunion Advanced Collapsed Wrist Treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (01) ◽  
pp. 032-038
Author(s):  
Sara Alicia González Porto ◽  
María Ángeles Cano Leira ◽  
Alba González Rodríguez ◽  
Ángel Álvarez Jorge
Keyword(s):  
Grip Strength ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Dorsal Plate ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Plate Removal ◽  
Ulnar Deviation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Dash Questionnaire

Objective To evaluate the outcomes of scaphoidectomy and capitolunate arthrodesis versus four-corner arthrodesis in patients with stage III scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrists. Methods We reviewed retrospectively all of the consecutive patients surgically treated in our center between 2007 and 2015, including 20 patients in the four-corner arthrodesis group and 11 patients in the capitolunate group. The mean follow-up time was of 47 months. The follow-up evaluation included wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, visual analogue scale (VAS), the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire, and the Mayo wrist scale (MWS). Postoperative complications and the radiographic evaluation were also assessed. Results There was no statistical difference in flexion, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, grip strength, VAS, DASH or MWS scores. There was a statistically significant increase (6°) in extension in capitolunate arthrodesis versus four-corner arthrodesis, possibly without clinical relevance. There were two nonunions in the four-corner group, and none in the capitolunate group. None of the patients in the capitolunate group required screw removal. One patient in the four-corner group required dorsal plate removal. One patient in each group required conversion to total arthrodesis. Conclusions Capitolunate arthrodesis shows similar results in wrist ROM, grip strength and patient-reported outcomes when compared with four-corner arthrodesis at an average follow-up period of 4 years. We did not have any pisotriquetral arthritis in the capitolunate arthrodesis group, despite not removing the triquetrum in any of patients of this group. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III.

Intermediate-term Experience With the STAR Total Ankle in the United States

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan M. Loewy ◽  
Thomas H. Sanders ◽  
Arthur K. Walling
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
The United States ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Background: Limited intermediate and no real long-term follow-up data have been published for total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in the United States. This is a report of clinical follow-up data of a prospective, consecutive cohort of patients who underwent TAA by a single surgeon from 1999 to 2013 with the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR) prosthesis. Methods: Patients undergoing TAA at a single US institution were enrolled into a prospective study. These patients were followed at regular intervals with history, physical examination, and radiographs; American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale scores were obtained and recorded. Primary outcomes included implant survivability and functional outcomes scores. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications such as periprosthetic or polyethylene fracture. Between 1999 and 2013, a total of 138 STAR TAAs were performed in 131 patients; 81 patients were female. The mean age at surgery was 61.5 ± 12.3 years (range, 30-88 years). The mean duration of follow-up for living patients who retained both initial components at final follow-up was 8.8±4.3 years (range 2-16.9 years). Results: The mean change in AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot scores from preoperative to final follow-up was 36.0 ± 16.8 ( P < .0001). There were 21 (15.2%) implant failures that occurred at a mean 4.9 ± 4.5 years postoperation. Ten polyethylene components in 9 TAAs (6.5%) required replacement for fracture at an average 8.9 ± 3.3 years postoperatively. Fourteen patients died with their initial implants in place. Conclusion: This cohort of patients with true intermediate follow-up after TAA with the STAR prosthesis had acceptable implant survival, maintenance of improved patient-reported outcome scores, and low major complication rates. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

scholarly journals Outcomes Following the Treatment of Talar Osteochondral Lesions with BioCartilage and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Mixture

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0004
Author(s):  
Ashraf Fansa ◽  
Mark Drakos ◽  
Taylor Cabe ◽  
Peter Fabricant
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Bone Marrow Aspirate ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Category: Arthroscopy Introduction/Purpose: With reported incidence rates ranging from 40% to 70% post ankle sprains and fractures, osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are not uncommon. However, management of such defects remains challenging. Microfracturing is considered the standard treatment for symptomatic OLTs.Larger lesions however typically require more invasive restorative procedures such as autologous osteochondral transplantation. Microfracture results are variable due to the fact that the resulting reparative fibrocartilage is weaker and biomechanically inferior to native hyaline cartilage. In this study, we examine the functional and radiological outcomes following use of a new arthroscopic technique utilizing a mixture of micronized allograft cartilage matrix (BioCartilage) (Arthrex, Naples, FL) soaked in Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) to fill OLTs. Methods: Eighty-six consecutive patients treated for OLT using arthroscopic debridement and BioCartilage matrix soaked in BMAC were identified. All patients were treated by a single fellowship-trained sports medicine and foot and ankle surgeon. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). This information was obtained from a prospective registry at the authors’ institution. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to determine statistical significance between pre and postoperative clinical scores. Additionally, an attending radiologist assessed the reparative cartilage morphology on postoperative MRI scans. This was evaluated and scored using a modified magnetic resonance observation of cartilage tissue (MOCART) scoring system. Results: Thirty-one patients (19 Females; 12 Males) with a mean age of 37.8 years (Range 15–54) had a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months and were thus included in this review. Mean follow-up duration was 15.8 months (Range 12 –25.7). The mean patient BMI was 27.4 (Range 19.6 – 39.4), while the average osteochondral lesion size was 85.9 mm2 (Range 35 – 220). The Physical Function domain of the PROMIS score, demonstrated statistically significant change, improving from 40.63 ±8.31 to 48.31 ±10.07 (p=0.02). The Pain Intensity domain also improved significantly from 49.06 ±9.32 to 42.14 ±9.38 (p=0.03). The Pain Interference domain and FAOS scores did improve but not reaching statistical significance. The mean MRI MOCART score was 69 ±13.34 with 13.3 months average follow-up duration. Conclusion: Achieving the longest duration possible of symptom-free functioning postoperatively is the main goal of any cartilage repair procedure. Augmentation of an articular lesion’s infill with BioCartilage and BMAC may help enhance the biomechanical properties of the reparative fibrocartilage construct and its longevity. Our initial findings demonstrate favorable patient-reported outcomes. Moreover, postoperative MRIs demonstrate the majority of the lesions showed either complete or hypertrophic infill, complete or hypertrophic integration, homogenous repair tissue, and isointense signals. Long-term studies prospectively assessing the effectiveness of this technique in maintaining pain-free-function of the ankle joint are warranted.

Hemiresection Interposition Arthroplasty of the Distal Radioulnar Joint: A Long-term Outcome Study

Hand ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 155894471987343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Femke Nawijn ◽  
Svenna H. W. L. Verhiel ◽  
Jesse B. Jupiter ◽  
Neal C. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Arthritis ◽  
Distal Radioulnar Joint ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Radioulnar Joint ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Background: The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with long-term patient-reported functional, pain, and satisfaction scores in patients who underwent (Bowers) hemiresection interposition technique (HIT) arthroplasty of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). The secondary aims were to determine the complication and reoperation rates. Methods: A retrospective study with long-term follow-up of patients undergoing HIT arthroplasty was performed. Demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics were collected for the 66 included patients. Thirty-one patients completed all surveys, which were the Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), our custom-made HIT arthroplasty questionnaire, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, and NRS for satisfaction. The mean interval between surgery and follow-up by means of questionnaires was 8.6 ± 3.4 years. Results: The mean QuickDASH score was 31.0 ± 20.2. The mean score of the HIT arthroplasty questionnaire was 2 ± 2. The median NRS for pain was 1 (interquartile range [IQR], 0-3), and the median NRS for satisfaction was 9 (IQR, 8-10). The complication rate and reoperation rate were 14% and 8%, respectively. Conclusion: Overall, patients expressed satisfaction with HIT arthroplasty, despite a mean QuickDASH score of 31.0. In our cohort, patients with inflammatory arthritis had higher satisfaction and lower pain scores. Patients who had prior trauma, prior surgery, or DRUJ subluxation are generally less satisfied. Men, older patients, and posttraumatic patients had higher long-term pain scores; however, posterior interosseous nerve neurectomy is associated with improved pain scores. Our findings support the use of HIT arthroplasty in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document