scholarly journals Regarding “Gaps in Treatment and Surveillance: Head and Neck Cancer Care in a Safety-Net Hospital”

OTO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473974X2093865
Author(s):  
Sahith Kudaravalli
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6077-6077
Author(s):  
Stephen Ramey ◽  
Haley Perlow ◽  
Ben Silver ◽  
Adam Jaffe ◽  
Deukwoo Kwon ◽  
...  

6077 Background: National guidelines emphasize the importance of speech and swallowing (SS) and nutrition services (NS) for head and neck cancer patients (pts). This study evaluates influences of demographic and treatment factors on receipt of SS and NS at a safety-net hospital (SH) and an adjacent private hospital (PH). It also examines associations between lack of these services and negative outcomes. Methods: This retrospective analysis included non-metastatic laryngeal or oropharyngeal cancer pts treated with radiotherapy (RT) at a PH or SH. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analyses utilized linear regression, logistic regression, and zero-inflated Poisson regression. Covariates included race, ethnicity, preferred language, insurance status, immigration status, gender, age, treating hospital, comorbidity score, primary treatment modalities, time to treatment initiation (TTI), and stage. Potential negative outcomes of not receiving SS and/or NS were analyzed only among pts treated with chemoradiation (CRT). Results: Of 239 pts (PH = 138 pts; SH = 56 pts), 28.6% of SH pts received SS pre-RT vs 54.1% at the PH (p < 0.001). Receipt of pre-RT NS did not differ significantly between SH (14.3%) and PH (19.7%) but was low at both. On MVA, SH care (OR 0.29; p = 0.029) and longer TTI (OR 0.99; p = 0.033) were associated with decreased pre-RT SS. In contrast, surgery before RT (OR 10.1; p = 0.002) and surgery before CRT (OR 10.7; p = 0.001) vs RT alone were associated with increased pre-RT SS. No covariates were significantly associated with receipt of NS on MVA. For pts receiving CRT, pre-RT SS was associated with less weight loss during RT (mean difference = 2%; p = 0.036). Receiving both pre-RT SS and NS was associated with fewer missed RT days (RR 0.49; p = 0.004). Receipt of SS and/or NS were not associated with gastric tube placement, emergency room visits, or non-chemotherapy admission days during or within 90 days of CRT. Conclusions: SS was received less often at a SH vs a PH. NS were delivered at a low level at both centers. Lack of supportive services was associated with increased missed RT days and increased weight loss during CRT. Quality metrics to establish supportive care benchmarks may help reduce disparities.


OTO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 2473974X1990076
Author(s):  
Karina Yu ◽  
Marisa Westbrook ◽  
Shauna Brodie ◽  
Sarah Lisker ◽  
Eric Vittinghoff ◽  
...  

Objective Treatment delays and suboptimal adherence to posttreatment surveillance may adversely affect head and neck cancer (HNC) outcomes. Such challenges can be exacerbated in safety-net settings that struggle with limited resources and serve a disproportionate number of patients vulnerable to gaps in care. This study aims to characterize treatment delays and adherence with posttreatment surveillance in HNC care at an urban tertiary care public hospital in San Francisco. Study Design Retrospective chart review. Setting Urban tertiary care public hospital in San Francisco. Subjects and Methods We identified all cases of HNC diagnosed from 2008 to 2010 through the electronic medical record. We abstracted data, including patient characteristics, disease characteristics, pathology and radiology findings, treatment details, posttreatment follow-up, and clinical outcomes. Results We included 64 patients. Median time from diagnosis to treatment initiation (DTI) was 57 days for all patients, 54 days for patients undergoing surgery only, 49 days for patients undergoing surgery followed by adjuvant radiation ± chemotherapy, 65 days for patients undergoing definitive radiation ± chemotherapy, and 29 days for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiation or chemoradiation. Overall, 69% of patients completed recommended treatment. Forty-two of 61 (69%) patients demonstrated adherence to posttreatment visits in year 1; this fell to 14 out of 30 patients (47%) by year 5. Conclusion DTI was persistently prolonged in this study compared with prior studies in other public hospital settings. Adherence to posttreatment surveillance was suboptimal and continued to decline as the surveillance period progressed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudiane MAHL ◽  
Luís Ricardo Santos de MELO ◽  
Maria Helena Andrade ALMEIDA ◽  
Catarina Sampaio CARVALHO ◽  
Lois Lene Silva SANTOS ◽  
...  

Oral Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 104738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erick Yuen ◽  
Gianna Fote ◽  
Peter Horwich ◽  
Shaun A. Nguyen ◽  
Rusha Patel ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (S2) ◽  
pp. S212-S215 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Dempsey ◽  
S Orr ◽  
S Lane ◽  
A Scott

AbstractThis is the official guideline endorsed by the specialty associations involved in the care of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. It discusses the role of the clinical nurse specialist in the head and neck cancer patient journey and provides recommendations on the clinical nurse specialist led assessments and interventions for this group of patients receiving cancer care.Recommendations• All cancer patients should meet a clinical nurse specialist at the point of diagnosis. (R)• Clinical nurse specialists must act as gate keeper to the patients' cancer pathway to provide a seamless journey. (R)• Holistic needs assessment should be completed at different stages of the patient's pathway to reflect the changes of the patients' needs. (R)• Clinical nurse specialists to be part of local and national initiatives for health promotion and raising awareness in the public domain. (G)• Clinical nurse specialists should lead in redesigning of services and policies to ensure they are responsive to patient's needs for the future. (G)• Treatment summaries should become part of practice to provide good communication between primary and secondary care to enable continuity of care for the patient. (G)


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 284-294
Author(s):  
◽  
Matthew Ellis ◽  
George Garas ◽  
John Hardman ◽  
Maha Khan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document