Targeting Immune Dysregulation in Childhood Evans Syndrome

Abstract Background: Evans Syndrome (ES) describes the simultaneous or sequential occurrence of 2 or more autoimmune cytopenias - most often autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but also autoimmune neutropenia (AIN) - which are often refractory to therapy and chronic in nature. Historically, ES has been attributed to idiopathic autoantibody production, but recent advances in our understanding of this disease have revealed associations with more well-described underlying disorders of immune regulation when properly investigated. These include autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) and more novel immune dysregulation disorders such as Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen-4 (CTLA-4) defects, among the more historically well-known systemic autoimmune diseases (such as systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]) and common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). Importantly, recent data shows improved outcomes among ES patients in whom underlying immune dysregulation is identified and for whom appropriately targeted immunomodulating treatments are then utilized. Despite this, the majority of underlying and potentially targetable pathologies driving ES in children remain undiagnosed; and treatment strategies are therefore empiric, resulting in sub-optimal outcomes among this population of patients. Aims: We aim to better describe the diagnostic rates, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes among a large cohort of pediatric patients with this rare and poorly studied disease, in order to identify barriers to appropriate and timely diagnostic investigation, to highlight areas for future research, and to better inform clinical practices. Methods: We completed a retrospective chart review including pediatric ES patients followed at 3 large tertiary centers over a recent 6-year period (2012 - 2018). All patients meeting eligibility criteria (those aged 6 months - 21 years, with 2 documented autoimmune cytopenias as defined by current international expert committee standards, and not having undergone solid organ or stem cell transplantation) were reviewed in accordance with IRB-approved protocols. Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test were utilized to compare nonparametric categorical data. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare nonparametric continuous data. A Kruskal-Wallis one way ANOVA test was used to compare ranks between more than two categories. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY). A Bonferroni correction was applied to correct for multiple comparisons. A p<0.05 was defined as statistically significant. Results: 48 eligible patients with ES were identified, with length of follow-up ranging from 0 to 12 years (median = 2.7 years). Underlying immune dysregulation was identified in 46% of patients - 12 with systemic autoimmune disease, 4 with ALPS, 3 with CVID, and 3 with other disorders of immune regulation (n=22). Notably, 100% of pediatric ES patients in whom a definitive immune dysregulation disorder was identified required ≥ 3 therapies (mean follow-up = 3.7 years), vs. only 58% of ES patients in whom no unifying immune diagnosis was made (mean follow-up = 3.2 years) [p=0.008]. Furthermore, second- and third-line immunomodulatory agents (including mycophenolate, hydroxychloroquine, 6-mercaptopurine, belimumab, ofatumumab, abatacept, rituximab, sirolimus, cyclosporine, azathioprine, danazol, and methotrexate) were utilized at a significantly higher rate among those with underlying immune dysregulation identified (82%) vs. those without (31%) [p=0.003]; and ≥3 immunomodulatory agents were required significantly more often in the group with underlying immune dysregulation identified (32%) vs. those without (0%) [p=0.016]. Among those in whom a unifying diagnosis was made, difference in time to diagnosis among groups was statistically significant (p=0.036), with the time to diagnosis for systemic autoimmune disease shorter than that for other immune dysregulation disorders. Overall, ES preceded identification of an underlying immune dysregulation disorder by an average of 3.7 years. Conclusion: A thorough investigative approach is necessary in pediatric ES patients, given the importance of identifying the more global immune dysregulation which would allow for targeted treatment strategies and lead to improved overall long-term outcomes among this population of patients. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Lambert: Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Summus: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Sysmex: Consultancy; Shionogi: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Educational Concepts in Medicine: Consultancy; CSL: Consultancy. Grace:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Despotovic:Novartis: Research Funding; AmGen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Patients with Myelofibrosis after Ruxolitinib Failure: Role of Disease Status and Treatment Strategies in 214 Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-116289 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4277-4277 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Francesca Palandri ◽

Elena Maria Elli ◽

Nicola Polverelli ◽

Massimiliano Bonifacio ◽

Giulia Benevolo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Strategies ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Disease Status ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Transfusion Dependency ◽

Investigational Agents

Abstract Introduction . Ruxolitinib (RUX) is the only targeted therapy available for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF)-related splenomegaly and symptoms. Significant clinical responses may be achieved in around 50% of patients (pts). However, half of responding pts lose the response over time. Aims . To report the outcome of a large cohort of MF pts after RUX failure, in terms of disease status, treatment strategies and survival. Methods . A clinical database was created in 23 European Hematology Centers including retrospective data of 537 MF pts treated with RUX from Jan 2011 to July 2018. Updated information at the date of July 15th 2018 was available in 442 pts who were included in the present analysis. Spleen and symptoms response (SR & SyR) to RUX were evaluated according to the 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. RUX-related toxicity and infections were graded according to the WHO scale. Overall (OS) was estimated from the date of RUX discontinuation to the date of death or last contact, using the Kaplan-Meyer method (log-rank test). Results . After a median follow-up of 30.5 months (1.7-84.3), 214 out of 442 evaluable (48.4%) pts had discontinued RUX. 43 (20.1%) died while on therapy because of: MF progression (34.9%), infections (25.6%), heart disease (16.3%), second neoplasia (7%), hemorrhages (7%), other (9.2%). The median follow-up after RUX discontinuation for the remaining 171 pts was 11.3 months (0.5-66.7). Causes of RUX discontinuation were: drug-related toxicity (28.6%), loss/lack of response (23.4%), MF progression (12.3%), acute leukemia (AL) (13.4%), allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (11.1%), second solid neoplasia (4.1%), other unrelated causes (i.e. pts decision; 7.1%). After stopping RUX, 68 pts received 1 line of therapy, 21 received 2 lines and 9 received >2 treatments; 73 pts did not receive any therapy. Treatments received after RUX discontinuation, alone or in combination, included hydroxyurea (HU) (n. 61, 62.2%), ASCT (n. 20, 20.4%), second-generation JAK2 inhibitors (momelotinib/fedratinib/pacritinib) (n. 11, 11.2%), splenectomy (n. 7, 7.1%), azacytidine/decitabine (n. 5, 5.1%), chemotherapy (n. 4, 4.1%), investigational agents (imetelstat/PRM151: n. 4), danazole (n. 4), erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) (n. 4). A total of 95 pts (55.6%) died after RUX discontinuation, because of: MF progression (30.5%), AL (25.4%), infections (14.7%), second neoplasia (9.5%), hemorrhages (4.2%), heart disease (4.2%), ASCT (4.2%), thrombosis (2.1%), other (5.2). Median survival time from RUX stop of the 171 evaluable pts was 22.6 mos (95% CI, 13.2-30.7). Among baseline features, survival after discontinuation was significantly influenced by the dynamic international prognostic score (DIPSS) category (p<0.001), transfusion dependency (p<0.001) and driver mutation status (with triple-negative pts having the worst survival compared to JAK2V617F and CALR-mutated pts, p=0.01). During therapy, 45 out of 153 (29.4%) and 123 out of 161 (76.4%) evaluable pts achieved a SR and a SyR at any time. Survival was not affected by the previous response to RUX at any time-point. Conversely, survival significantly differed according to the reason for stopping RUX, with pts discontinuing because of AL evolution/second solid neoplasia having the worst outcome (Figure 1a, p<0.001). In pts who discontinued RUX in chronic phase, the use of second generation TKIs and other investigational agents tended to prolong survival compared to the administration of conventional medical treatments (i.e. HU, danazole, ESA) (Figure 1b, p=0.07) Discussion . After RUX failure, very limited therapeutic options are available and the prognosis of MF pts is dismal, particularly for those pts starting RUX with advanced stage disease (i.e. high DIPSS category and transfusion dependency). Also, disease evolution into AL and occurrence of a second solid neoplasia significantly reduced life expectancy. In chronic phase pts, survival probability may be improved by the use of medical therapies that are still in the experimental phase. Novel investigational agents are needed. Disclosures Palandri: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Abruzzese:BMS: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Vitolo:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Aversa:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Basilea: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cuneo:Gilead: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau. Foà:ROCHE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; JANSSEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; GILEAD: Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Speakers Bureau; CELTRION: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; ABBVIE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; INCYTE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; CELGENE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau. Di Raimondo:Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cavo:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Breccia:Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Palumbo:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Overview of Primary and Secondary Myelofibrosis in Young Adults: Genomic Characteristics, Treatment Strategies and Outcomes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123536 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4177-4177

Author(s):

Andrew T Kuykendall ◽

Chetasi Talati ◽

Kendra L. Sweet ◽

Eric Padron ◽

David A Sallman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Strategies ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment History ◽

Secondary Myelofibrosis

Introduction: Primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF) [i.e. occurring after a prior diagnosis of polycythemia vera [PV] or essential thrombocythemia (ET)] are myeloid malignancies often diagnosed in the 6th and 7th decade of life. In the rare occurrence that younger patients receive this diagnosis, prognostic recommendations are poorly extrapolated and optimal treatment strategies are unclear. Prior studies assessing young MF patients have suggested a more indolent course for this cohort. Here we aim to analyze our experience with young MF patients in terms of genetic makeup, treatment history, and outcomes. Methods: We assessed a database of primary and secondary MF patients who presented to our center between 1/2000 and 6/2019. We identified patients who were 50 years or younger at the time of MF diagnosis. Clinical and genetic features along with treatment history and outcomes were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Patients surviving at 240 months after diagnosis were censored at that time. Results: Among 599 MF patients, 63 (11%) were ≤50 at the time of diagnosis. Median age at diagnosis was 43.6 years (yr). Median time from diagnosis to first presentation to our institution was 4.2 months (mo) (range 0-35 yr). Thirty-eight (60%) and 44 (70%) were seen within 1 and 5 years of diagnosis, respectively. Females accounted for 62% (n = 39) of patients. Forty-five (71%) patients had primary MF, 4 (6%) had post-PV MF and 13 (21%) post-ET MF. Median follow-up for the cohort was 94.9 mo. Among 62 patients in whom IPSS at diagnosis could be calculated, 20 (32%) were low, 27 (44%) intermediate-1, 12 (19%) intermediate-2, and 3 (5%) high-risk. JAK2 mutation was detected in 22/60 (37%), CALR in 21/44 (48%), MPL in 0/49 (0%). One patient was triple-negative. Extended targeted gene sequencing was performed in 42/63 patients during their clinical course. Sequencing occurred at a median time of 2.6 yr after diagnosis (range 0-35 yr). Genes most commonly mutated were ASXL1 (12%), TET2 (12%), EZH2 (10%), and DNMT3A (10%). No mutations involving SRSF2, U2AF1, ZRSR2, or SF3B1 were seen. Thirteen patients did not receive active treatment during follow-up. Among those receiving treatment, median time to first treatment was 9.4 mo (range 0-331 mo). The most common initial treatments were erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) (14%), hydroxyurea (28%), and ruxolitinib (22%). In total, 29 (46%) received ruxolitinib with median time to ruxolitinib treatment of 27.2 mo. Median duration of ruxolitinib treatment was 44.5 mo. Fourteen patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHCT) at a median of 57.4 mo after diagnosis (range 6-123 mo). Transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) occurred in 5 patients at a median time of 99 mo (range 51-178 mo) after diagnosis. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Five and 10-year OS estimated at 93% and 77%, respectively. No difference was seen in OS for patients with primary and secondary MF (p = 0.40). Conclusions: Primary and secondary MF are rarely diagnosed in patients ≤ 50 years old. In this cohort, patients are often CALR mutant, have lower-risk disease, and lack splicing mutations. Initial treatment strategies are varied, but favor cytoreductive approaches. The prognosis in these patients is favorable, but high-risk mutations can occur and progression to AML occurs in a minority of patients. AHCT remains a curative option; however, optimal timing for transplant is not clear. Figure Disclosures Kuykendall: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Talati:Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria. Sweet:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Stemline: Consultancy. Sallman:Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. List:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lancet:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services ; Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Komrokji:JAZZ: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; DSI: Consultancy; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Second Relapse of Pediatric Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report on Current Treatment Strategies and Outcome of the AML-BFM Study Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139317 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 24-24

Author(s):

Mareike Rasche ◽

Emma Steidel ◽

Martin Zimmermann ◽

Jean-Pierre Bourquin ◽

Heidrun Boztug ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Strategies ◽

Population Based ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytotoxic Treatment ◽

First Relapse ◽

Pediatric Aml

BACKGROUND: Children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) still experience high rates of relapse. Facing increasing survival after first relapse, it appears critically important to examine the consequences of a second relapse in more detail. However, there is no population-based data available in pediatric AML and no reliable statement about general survival, patients' characteristics or treatment approaches can be made. Herein, we report current survival results following second relapse from the BFM study group, which represents to our knowledge the largest available dataset for this subgroup of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2017, 1222 pediatric patients (age less than 18 years at initial AML diagnosis) with AML (no secondary leukemia, no Down syndrome, no acute promyelocytic leukemia) were registered in the population-based AML-BFM registry and trials in Germany, Austria, Czech Republic and Switzerland providing a longitudinal data collection with treatment, response rates, survival and disease characteristics. Central review of source documentation confirmed accuracy and consistency of all reported data. Only patients with a documented date of first and second complete remission (CR1 and CR2) and a diagnosed second relapse until the age of 21 are included. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute). All living patients were censored at the time of last follow-up, but no patient later than 03/27/2020. The median follow-up after diagnosis of second relapse was 6,5 years. RESULTS: In all registered patients, 7% (83 out of 1222) met the strict criteria for a second relapse. For further analyses patients with a date of second relapse diagnosis after 12/31/2017 (n=6), two patients with isolated CNS relapse, who did not receive systemic chemotherapy, one patient with an underlying syndrome and one patient with insufficient data have been excluded. The median age at second relapse was 9,2 years. Sixty percent (n=44) of the patients, who experienced a second relapse, did so within a year after first relapse diagnosis. Eighty percent (n=58) and 7% (n=5) had one or two previous HSCTs, respectively. Eighty-nine percent (n=65) received an anthracycline-containing re-induction (DNX-FLA) followed by FLA or another intensive treatment regimen before at first relapse. In contrast to the standardized treatment approaches in first relapse, patients with second relapse received a wide range of therapy. Forty-six patients (63%) have been treated with an intensive cytotoxic treatment (Table 1). Seventeen patients (23%) got palliation only. Among the 25 patients (35%) who proceeded to HSCT, 21 patients (88%) had a prior HSCT. Survival after second relapse was very poor with a 5-year pOS of 15±4% (see Figure 1A) and a considerable cumulative incidence of early deaths (until day 56 after diagnosis: CI ED 19±5%). Prognosis did not improve over time with consistent overall survival rates until 2017 (see Figure 1B). Causes of death include disease progression (n= 51, 70% of all patients), a combined SCT-related and disease-related cause (n=3, 5%) and SCT-related complications (n=4, 4%) or treatment-associated toxicity (n=5, 7%). The 5-year pOS was 2±2% for patients with an early second relapse vs. 33±9% for those experiencing a second relapse more than a year after the first. (p<0.0001; Figure 1C). The timing of a first relapse and age did not show any influence on overall survival. The best response achieved in the respective bone marrow sample after up to two cycles with cytotoxic treatment have been categorized. Out of 45 patients with conclusive data 31.1% (n=14) achieved a third CR with a pOS of 36±13%, while 62.2% of the patients showed a nonresponse to the treatment (n=28, pOS 7±5%) or no evidence of leukemia, but also no peripheral regeneration (6.7%, n=3, pOS 0±0%). CONCLUSION: These data provide new insights into treatment strategies, prognostic factors and outcome of children with second relapse in pediatric AML. As expected, survival is poor, but nonetheless possible in this increasingly relevant subgroup of patients. These data may serve as foundation for urgently needed international clinical trials for relapsed and refractory AML in children. Disclosures Bourquin: Servier: Other: Travel Support. Reinhardt:CLS Behring: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Comparable Outcomes between Unrelated Donor (8/8 or 7/8 matched) and Haploidentical Donor for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130419 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4619-4619

Author(s):

Jee Yon Shin ◽

Sung-Soo Park ◽

Gi June Min ◽

Silvia Park ◽

Sung-Eun Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Sibling Donor ◽

Alternative Donor ◽

Matched Sibling ◽

Grade Ii

Background Either allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) from HLA-matched sibling donor or immunosuppressive therapy (IST) has been recommended as one of the standard treatments for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Regarding only 30% of chance finding HLA‐matched sibling donor, SCT from an alternative donor including unrelated (URD) or haplo-identical related donor (HAPLO) is considered to be a treatment option after failure to IST in patients who lack of a HLA-matched sibling donor. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of URD SCT and HAPLO SCT for SAA patients. Method Consecutive 152 adult patients with SAA who received first SCT between March 2002 and May 2018 were included: 73 of HLA-well-matched (8/8) URD (WM-URD), 34 of HLA-mismatched URD (MM-URD), and 45 of HAPLO. With the intention to have a follow-up period at least 1 year, data were analyzed at May 2019. A conditioning regimen with total body irradiation (TBI) and cyclophosphamide was used for URD-SCT, whereas that with TBI and fludarabine was administered for HAPLO-SCT (Lee et al, BBMT 2011;17:101, Park et al, BBMT 2017;23:1498, Lee et al, Am J Hematol 2018;93:1368). The combination of tacrolimus and methotrexate were used as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Results The median follow-up was 53.4 (range, 0.2-174.1) months. The median age of URD and HAPLO cohort was 30 (range 18-59) and 34 (range 18-59) years, respectively. Except for one and three patients who failed respective a neutrophil and platelet engraftment, other patients achieved neutrophil and platelet engraftments with median 11 and 15 days for WM-URD, 13 and 16.5 days for MM-URD, and 12 and 14 days for HAPLO, respectively. The five-years overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), and cumulative incidences (CIs) of graft-failure and transplant-related mortality were similar among three groups: 88.3%, 85.5%, 2.7%, and 11.7% for WM-URD; 81.7%, 81.7%, 0%, and 18.3% for MM-URD, and 86.3%, 84.1%, 6.7%, and 9.2% for HAPLO. The 180-days CI of grade II-IV acute GVHD in WM-URD, MM-URD and HAPLO were 35.6%, 52.9%, and 28.9%, respectively; and moderate to severe chronic GVHD were 28.7%, 38.7% and 11.8% in respective cohort. The CI of grade II-IV acute GVHD and moderate to severe chronic GVHD were significantly higher in MM-URD than those in HAPLO (both, p=0.026). ATG is the only factor affecting both grade II-IV acute GVHD (Hazard ratio 0.511, p=0.01) and moderate to severe chronic GVHD (Hazard ratio 0.378, p=0.003) in multivariate analysis. Other complications including CMV DNAemia, hemorrhagic cystitis, invasive fungal disease, secondary malignancy, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome were similar among three groups. Survival outcomes of a subgroup of ≥ 2 allele MM-URD (n=16) extracted form MM-URD were inferior that of other donor types (n=136): 75.0% vs. 86.9% (p=0.163) for 5-year OS and 75.0% vs. 84.7% (p=0.272) for 5-year FFS. Conclusion This study shows that there were no significant differences between alternative donor sources in the absence of suitable matched sibling donor. Host/donor features and urgency of transplant should drive physician towards the best choice among alternative donor sources for SAA patients treated with SCT. However, selection of ≥ 2 allele MM-URD should not be recommended due to high incidence of GVHD and inferior outcomes. Figure Disclosures Kim: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Hanmi: Consultancy, Honoraria; AGP: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SL VaxiGen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria; Yuhan: Honoraria; Sanofi-Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Handok: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BL & H: Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria. Lee:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Achillion: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Clinical and Biological Characteristics and Outcomes of Richter Transformation : A French Multicenter Study from the Filo Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128053 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4112-4112

Author(s):

Charline Moulin ◽

Romain Morizot ◽

Thomas Remen ◽

Hélène Augé ◽

Florian Bouclet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Long Term Survivors ◽

First Line Treatment

Introduction: About 2 to 10% of patients (pts) diagnosed with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, so-called Richter transformation (RT)) over long-term follow-up. The outcomes of pts with RT are variable and poorly understood and there is no consensus on the best therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, outcomes and factors predictive of survival in a large series of RT from the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO). Methods: Biopsy-confirmed RT (limited to DLBCL and excluding Hodgkin lymphoma) diagnosed from 2001 to 2018 were identified from eight FILO centers. Clinical and biological characteristics of CLL and RT at diagnosis, including cytogenetics, clonal relation with the pre-existing CLL, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status, cell of origin (COO) analyzed by immunohistochemistry and RT score (Tsimberidou AM et al, J Clin Oncol, 2006) were analyzed as well as treatment and outcomes. Overall survivals (OS) were defined as time from CLL and RT diagnosis to death from any cause and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4. Results: A total of 70 CLL pts who developed RT were identified. The median age at CLL diagnosis was 62 years old (range 35-82), and 50 (71.4 %) were male. The median time to transformation was 5.5 years (range 0 to 22 years), with 12 simultaneous diagnosis of CLL and RT. Prior to RT, 20 (29%) pts had not been treated for CLL, 50 received one (n=21) or more (n= 29) line of treatment ; 6 pts had received a novel agent (ibrutinib, idelalisib or venetoclax). The median age at RT diagnosis was 68 years old (range 42-88). All biopsies were centrally reviewed; 38/58 pts (66%) had elevated LDH (>1.5N) ; 35/65 pts (54 %) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm); 10/54 (18.5%) pts had del(17p) or TP53 mutation ; 9/42 pts (21%) had a complex karyotype (at least 3 abnormalities). The CLL and RT were clonally related in 27/27 (100%) tested pts. COO by Hans algorithm was non germinal center B cell-like (GCB) in 26/28 pts (93%). EBV was positive or detected in 5/40 (12.5%) pts. The median of Ki67 positivity was 70% (range 30% to 100%). The RT score (based at RT diagnosis on ECOG performance status 2-4, LDH >1.5 x normal, platelets<100 x 109/L, tumor size >5 cm and >1 prior therapy for CLL) was : low risk in 17 pts (31%), low-intermediate risk in 10 pts (19%), high-intermediate risk in 14 pts (25%) and high risk in 14 pts (25%). The most common first-line treatment of RT was immunochemotherapy (n=57, 87%) including R-CHOP-like regimen (n=48, 73%). Autologous or allogeneic transplantation was performed for 7 pts (11%). Response to first-line treatment was complete or partial response in 26 pts (40%), and stable disease or progression in 39 pts (60%). After a median follow-up of 8 years, 51/64 pts (80%) have died. The main causes of death were progressive DLBCL (n=36, 71%), infection (n=8, 16%) or progressive CLL (n=2, 4%). The median OS of the cohort from CLL and RT diagnosis (Figure 1) were 7.8 years and 9.5 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with TP53 disruption at CLL stage, low platelets count, elevated LDH, elevated beta2-microglobulin, high ECOG score, high RT score, EBV positivity and absence of response to first-line RT treatment had worse OS. The ECOG score, platelets count and TP53 disruption remain significant in multivariate Cox-regression. Last, we compared the clinical and biological parameters of two Richter groups defined as: (i) short-term survivors (<12 months, n = 34) and (ii) long-term survivors (>48 months, n = 18). Long survival was significantly associated with elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to RT first-line treatment. Discussion: The clinical outcomes of RT patients is poor and novel treatment options are needed. However, a group of long-term survivors was identified, characterized by elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to immunochemotherapy. Disclosures Leblond: Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Thieblemont:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Kyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cymbalista:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Guièze:Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Broseus:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Feugier:gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Patient Characteristics and Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125449 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2609-2609

Author(s):

Muhned Alhumaid ◽

Georgina S Daher-Reyes ◽

Wilson Lam ◽

Arjun Law ◽

Tracy Murphy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Older Patients ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Age Groups ◽

Treatment Strategies ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Disease Behavior

Introduction: Clinical outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) are rarely reported as an isolated subgroup. Treatments vary little across age groups, and treatment intensity depends upon comorbid conditions and performance status. Optimal treatment strategies focused on disease behavior, biological factors, and the distinct needs of this subset of AML patients remain elusive. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to determine the characteristics and outcomes of AYA AML patients treated at a specialized adult leukemia cancer center in comparison to older adults with AML (40-60 years). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center from 2008-2018. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. Clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and survival outcomes were recorded for all patients. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and the impact of covariates were assessed using the Log-rank test. Finally, we compared the outcomes of AYA patients treated at our centre between 2015-2018 with older patients. Results: A total of 175 patients aged 18-39 were identified. Patient characteristics are shown in (Table 1). Cytogenetic were available in 163 patients. Based on MRC criteria, 27 (16%) were favorable risk, intermediate in 95 (54%), adverse in 39 (22%), and missing/failed in 14(8%). NPM1 status was available in 110 patients of whom 38 (35%) were positive. FLT3-ITD was available in 67 patients with 24 (36%) positive. Both mutations were present in 13 (54%) patients. There were no significant differences in terms of risk stratification based on cytogenetic and molecular markers based on age (18-29 vs.30-39) (P= 0.98). Most patients 172 (98%) received induction, 157 (91%) with 3+7, and 15 (9%) with FLAG-IDA. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 133 (77%) after first induction [120 (76%) after 3+7 and 11 (73%) after FLAG-IDA]. Induction related mortality was low (2%). Of the 39 who did not achieve CR, thirty-four patients received re-induction (13 FLAG-IDA, 16 NOVE-HiDAC, 5 others) with CR in 21 (62%). Overall, 154 (89.5%) achieved CR1. Sixty-four (42%) proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in CR1. 59 (38%) patients relapsed in CR1 with 8 (12%) relapsing post HSCT. Fifty-five (5 post HSCT) patients received reinduction with 30 (51%) (2 after HSCT) achieving CR2. Fifteen patients received HSCT in CR2. OS and DFS at 2 years were 62% (95% CI 0.53-0.69) and 50% (95% CI 0.41-0.57), respectively. Stratified by cytogenetic risk, OS was 81% for favorable risk, 61% for intermediate, and 50% for adverse risk (P=0.0001), respectively. DFS in these groups was 85%, 57%, and 46 % (P=0.0025), respectively. We further compared outcomes in the 18-29y and 30-39y age groups. The OS was 61.9% compared to 62.5% (P=0.91) and DFS of 52.1% compared to 47% (P=0.65) respectively. On univariate analysis for OS and DFS, cytogenetic risk stratification was the only significant variable (P=0.0004 and P=0.0042). We then compared the outcomes 67 sequential patients aged I8-39 treated from 2014-2018, with those of 176 sequential patients aged 40-60 treated during the same period (table 2). OS at 2 years was not statistically higher in the younger group compared to the older group (66.7% vs. 61.2%, P=0.372). While relapse rate was lower in older patients (15.5% vs. 22.6%, P=0.093), NRM was higher in older patients (29.7% vs. 18.8%,P=0.094). Conclusion: AYA pts. occupy a unique niche amongst AML as a whole. While treatment responses have improved in general, there may be potential for further gains in these patients. Increased tolerance for more intense treatment strategies as well as the incorporation of novel agents into standard treatment protocols may provide a means to optimize care in AYA patients. Finally, research is needed to elucidate biological mechanisms and predictors of disease behavior instead of arbitrary, age-stratified treatment schema. Disclosures McNamara: Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc.: Consultancy. Schimmer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medivir Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schuh:Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maze:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Gupta:Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Targeted Treatment and Survival Following Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Leukemia and MDS in the Contemporary Era

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124533 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4567-4567

Author(s):

Sanghee Hong ◽

Lisa Rybicki ◽

Donna Corrigan ◽

Betty K. Hamilton ◽

Ronald Sobecks ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Treatment Strategies ◽

Targeted Agents ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Survival After Relapse ◽

Grade Ii

Introduction: Relapse is the most frequent cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). While transplant-related mortality has decreased substantially over the last few decades, little progress has been made in outcomes and no standard of care exists for patients (pts) with post-alloHCT relapse. In the recent era, several new therapies, including targeted agents, have been approved for ALL, AML, and MDS. We conducted a study to evaluate outcomes of pts with these diseases who relapse after alloHCT in the contemporary period with routine availability of these newer therapeutic agents. Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective cohort study to review treatment strategies and outcomes of relapse post-alloHCT. We identified 420 adult pts who received their first alloHCT in 2010-2018 using any conditioning regimen or donor source. Overall, 115 (27%) pts experienced relapse (ALL=17/64 [27%], AML=67/242 [28%], MDS=31/114 [27%]) and were included in the analysis. Results: Myeloablative (54%) matched-unrelated donor grafts (50%) were the most common types of HCTs. Peripheral blood stem cell graft (49%) and bone marrow graft (48%) were used the most. Median time from alloHCT to relapse was 5 (range 1-65) months, and 83% of relapses occurred within the first year. Only 24% and 11% of pts experienced grade II-IV acute and any chronic GVHD prior to relapse, respectively. Seven of 17 pts had Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL. Mutation panel was tested in 56% of AML and MDS. Median follow-up period after relapse was 19 (range 6-80) months. The estimated survival after relapse for all diseases was 32% (95% CI 24-41%) at 6 months, 21% (14-28%) at 12 months, and 14% (8-21%) at 24 months (Fig 1). Excluding pts treated with supportive care only, the majority received a combination of different treatments; pts with ALL received median 3 (range 1-5), pts with AML received median 2 (1-4), and pts with MDS received median 1 (1-3) agent. Targeted therapies used for ALL pts included blinatumomab (n=5) and BCR-ABL targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors with (n=2) or without (n=4) chemotherapy. Among AML pts, targeted agents were used in 15 pts (sorafenib [n=7], 2 each with enasidenib, gemtuzumab ozagamicin, and ivosidenib, and 1 each with venetoclax and SEL24 [a dual pan-PIM/FLT3 inhibitor]). One pt each was treated with enasidenib, gemtuzumab ozagamicin, and PTC299 (an inhibitor of VEGFA mRNA translation) followed by SEL24 for MDS. Second alloHCTs (n=5) were performed median 5 (range 1-16) months after first HCT and median 1 month (range 0-5 months) after relapse. Two pts received no bridging therapy, while 3 pts received chemotherapy (n=2) or donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI [n=1]) prior to the second transplant. DLI without second transplant was used in 25 pts at a median of 20 (range 3-18) months after ALL relapse, median 2 (range 0-13) months after AML relapse, and median 3 (range 1-5) months after MDS relapse. Following DLI, 53% pts developed GVHD. Targeted therapy was associated with a trend towards better survival compared to other therapies (Fig 2, HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.41-1.03, p=0.06). Based on multivariable analysis, matched unrelated (vs. matched sibling, HR 1.70, p=0.027) or haploidentical donor grafts (HR 2.69, p=0.003), presence of grade II-IV acute GVHD before relapse (HR 2.46, p<0.001), and less than 12 months from HCT to relapse (<6 vs. >12 months, HR 6.34, p<0.001; 6-12 vs. >12 months, HR 3.16, p=0.005) were adverse prognostic features with survival after relapse post-alloHCT (Table 1). Conclusion: Outcomes of pts with ALL, AML, and MDS who relapse following alloHCT remain poor in the contemporary era when several newer therapies, including targeted agents, are available for their treatment. Targeted agents were used only in a minority of post-alloHCT relapses likely due to the combination of pt status, absence of the target mutation, the agents' availability, and other factors. Pts who developed grade II-IV acute GVHD and had shorter "disease-free" duration from unrelated or haploidentical donor grafts had the significantly shorter survival following relapse. More innovative treatment strategies to prevent and treat relapse post-alloHCT are needed. Disclosures Hill: Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celegene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; TG therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding. Anwer:In-Cyte: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Majhail:Atara Bio: Consultancy; Anthem, Inc.: Consultancy; Nkarta: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-116496 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2149-2149

Author(s):

Romil Patel ◽

Neeraj Y Saini ◽

Ankur Varma ◽

Omar Hasan ◽

Qaiser Bashir ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Remission ◽

Relapsed Disease

Abstract Introduction: The role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in the management of patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM), a rare, indolent lymphoma, has not been established. We had previously published our experience with auto-HCT in a small cohort of WM patients1. Here, we present an updated analysis of auto-HCT with a larger cohort of WM patients. Methods and study population: The study cohort was comprised of 29 patients who underwent high-dose chemotherapy and auto-HCT at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create survival curves. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration from date of transplant to death or last date of follow-up in living patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the duration from date of transplant to either progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first. Results: Median age at auto-HCT was 60 (range, 43-75 years). Eight patients (28%) had concurrent light chain amyloidosis (AL). Of the five patients who had MYD88 testing completed, 3 were positive for the MYD88 mutation. Additionally, of these 3 patients, 2 were also positive for CXCR4 mutation. Patients received a median of 2 lines (range 1-6) of therapy prior to auto-HCT; 3(10%) patients had primary refractory disease, 8(28%) were in first remission, and 18 (62%) had relapsed disease. Median time from transplant to last follow-up for the surviving patients was 5.3 years. Preparative regimens received by the patients were: Melphalan (n=20), BEAM-R (n=2), Busulfan/Melphalan (n=1), Cyclophosphomaide/Etoposide/total body irradiation (n=1), Thiotepa/Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (n=1), and Carmustine/Thiotepa (n=1). Three patients further went on to receive allogeneic transplant either after relapse from auto-HCT or due to disease transformation to aggressive lymphoma. Twenty-eight patients achieved engraftment with a median time to neutrophil engraftment of 11 days (range, 10-15 days). One patient suffered primary graft failure due to progression of disease and died 84 days after transplant. Non-relapse mortality was 3.4% at 1 year. All patients were eligible for response evaluation. The median OS from diagnosis was 12.2 years. Overall response rate was 96%: complete response (n=8, 27.6%), very good partial response (n=5, 17.3%), partial response (n=15, 51.7%), and progressive disease (n=1, 3.4%). PFS and OS at 5 years were 43.3% and 62.9%, respectively. Median PFS and OS from auto-HCT were 4.1 and 7.3 years (Fig. 1A). The median OS from auto-HCT in first remission + primary refractory and relapsed disease was 8.2 years and 4.1 years, respectively.16 patients were alive at the time of censoring while 13 patients had died. Causes of death include relapsed disease (n=6), secondary malignancy (n=2), infection (n=1), chronic graft-versus-host disease (n=1), and unknown (n=3). 8 patients (28%) were positive for concurrent AL amyloidosis. The sites of amyloid involvement were kidneys (n=2), lungs (n=1), bone marrow (n=1), heart(n=1), lymph nodes(n=1), gastrointestinal tract (n=1) and subcutaneous fat aspirate(n=5). The median overall survival for patients with amyloid involvement (n=8) was 12 years. On univariate analyses, the number of chemotherapy regimens prior to transplant (≤ 2 vs >2 lines) was the strongest predictor of overall survival (p=0.03, HR 0.3, CI: 0.09-0.9, log-rank) and PFS (p=0.001, HR 0.24, CI: 0.07-0.85, log-rank). The median PFS in patients with ≤ 2 lines and > 2 lines of therapy was 71 months versus 19 months, respectively (Fig. 1B). Conclusion: Auto-HCT is safe and feasible in selected patients with WM, with a high response rate and durable remission even in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. References: Krina Patel et.al. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. Blood 2012 120:4533; Disclosures Thomas: Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb Inc.: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Array Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Research Funding. Lee:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai Biopharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Orlowski:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; BioTheryX: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Champlin:Otsuka: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Patel:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Conventional Immunochemotherapy (R-CHOEP) Vs High-Dose Immunochemotherapy (R-MegaCHOEP) in Younger Patients with High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: 10-Year Long-Term Follow-up of a German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA) Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123637 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1589-1589

Author(s):

Fabian Frontzek ◽

Marita Ziepert ◽

Maike Nickelsen ◽

Bettina Altmann ◽

Bertram Glass ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Scientific Advisory Board ◽

Scientific Advisory

Introduction: The R-MegaCHOEP trial showed that dose-escalation of conventional chemotherapy necessitating autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) does not confer a survival benefit for younger patients (pts) with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the Rituximab era (Schmitz et al., Lancet Oncology 2012; 13, 1250-1259). To describe efficacy and toxicity over time and document the long-term risks of relapse and secondary malignancy we present the 10-year follow-up of this study. Methods: In the randomized, prospective phase 3 trial R-MegaCHOEP younger pts aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk (aaIPI 2-3) aggressive B-cell lymphoma were assigned to 8 cycles of CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubcine, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone) or 4 cycles of dose-escalated high-dose therapy (HDT) necessitating repetitive ASCT both combined with Rituximab. Both arms were stratified according to aaIPI, bulky disease, and center. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). All analyses were calculated for the intention-to-treat population. This follow-up report includes molecular data based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC (IHC: 31/92 positive [40-100%], FISH: 14/103 positive), BCL2 (IHC: 65/89 positive [50-100%], FISH: 23/111 positive) and BCL6 (IHC: 52/86 positive [30-100%], FISH: 34/110 positive) and data on cell of origin (COO) classification according to the Lymph2CX assay (GCB: 53/88; ABC: 24/88; unclassified: 11/88). Results: 130 pts had been assigned to R-CHOEP and 132 to R-MegaCHOEP. DLBCL was the most common lymphoma subtype (~80%). 73% of pts scored an aaIPI of 2 and 27% an aaIPI of 3. 60% of pts had an initial lymphoma bulk and in 40% more than 1 extranodal site was involved. After a median observation time of 111 months, EFS at 10 years was 57% (95% CI 47-67%) in the R-CHOEP vs. 51% in the R-MegaCHOEP arm (42-61%) (hazard ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8, p=0.228), overall survival (OS) after 10 years was 72% (63-81%) vs. 66% (57-76%) respectively (p=0.249). With regard to molecular characterization, we were unable to detect a significant benefit for HDT/ASCT in any subgroup analyzed. In total, 16% of pts (30 pts) relapsed after having achieved a complete remission (CR). 23% of all relapses (7 pts) showed an indolent histology (follicular lymphoma grade 1-3a) and 6 of these pts survived long-term. In contrast, of 23 pts (77%) relapsing with aggressive DLBCL or unknown histology 18 pts died due to lymphoma or related therapy. The majority of relapses occurred during the first 3 years after randomization (median time: 22 months) while after 5 years we detected relapses only in 5 pts (3% of all 190 pts prior CR). 11% of pts were initially progressive (28 pts) among whom 71% (20 pts) died rapidly due to lymphoma. Interestingly, the remaining 29% (8 pts) showed a long-term survival after salvage therapy (+/- ASCT); only 1 pt received allogeneic transplantation. The frequency of secondary malignancies was very similar in both treatment arms (9% vs. 8%) despite the very high dose of etoposide (total 4g/m2)in the R-MegaCHOEP arm. We observed 2 cases of AML and 1 case of MDS per arm. In total 70 pts (28%) have died: 30 pts due to lymphoma (12%), 22 pts therapy-related (11 pts due to salvage therapy) (9%), 8 pts of secondary neoplasia (3%), 5 pts due to concomitant disease (2%) and 5 pts for unknown reasons. Conclusions: This 10-year long-term follow-up of the R-MegaCHOEP trial confirms the very encouraging outcome of young high-risk pts following conventional chemotherapy with R-CHOEP. High-dose therapy did not improve outcome in any subgroup analysis including molecular high-risk groups. Relapse rate was generally low. Pts with aggressive relapse showed a very poor long-term outcome while pts with indolent histology at relapse survived long-term. Secondary malignancies occurred; however, they were rare with no excess leukemias/MDS following treatment with very high doses of etoposide and other cytotoxic agents. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Figure Disclosures Nickelsen: Roche Pharma AG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Roche: Honoraria. Truemper:Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Held:Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Dreyling:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: scientific advisory board; Sandoz: Other: scientific advisory board; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Other: scientific advisory board. Viardot:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenwald:MorphoSys: Consultancy. Lenz:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Employment, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Schmitz:Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Equity Ownership; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Routine Use of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in 7+3-Based Inductions for All "Non-Adverse" Risk AML

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142691 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 36-37

Author(s):

Gavin Hui ◽

Abdullah Ladha ◽

Edna Cheung ◽

Caroline Berube ◽

Steven Coutre ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Myeloablative Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Monosomy 7

Introduction: The addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to 7+3 chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been shown to significantly improve event-free survival (EFS) for cytogenetically favorable-risk AML, with marginal benefit for intermediate-risk AML, and no benefit for cytogenetically adverse-risk AML. Of note, with the exception of mutated FLT3-ITD, little is known about the impact of GO in ELN 2017-defined genotypically adverse-risk AML, and a recent randomized trial found no EFS benefit for 7+3+GO in patients (pts) with genotypically favorable-risk, NPM1-mutated AML. Since 2017, our institution incorporated GO into 7+3-based inductions for all "non-adverse" risk AML pts, as defined by wild-type FLT3 and no abnormalities on rapid FISH analysis for del(5q)/monosomy 5, del(7q)/monosomy 7, and del(20q). We report our experience treating all pts with "non-adverse" risk AML-as defined by this algorithm-with 7+3+GO. Methods: An institutional database was queried in order to identify all pts ≥18 years old who received 7+3-based chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML between 2017 and 2020; pts who received the FDA-approved fractionated dose of GO were included in the analysis. Data collection included demographic variables, karyotype/FISH, targeted PCR analyses, and multigene NGS panels for AML-related mutations including, but not limited to, mutations in FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, TP53, RUNX1, and ASXL1. Outcome data included response to induction, relapse, and death, as well as hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) rates, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant complications. Results: Between January 2017 and July 2020, 96 pts received 7+3-based induction at our institution. Of these, 29 (30%) received 7+3 in combination with GO. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years (range 23-66), with 17 (59%) males. Sixteen (55%) pts had ELN favorable-risk AML (5 [31%] by cytogenetics and 11 [69%] by genotype), 6 (21%) pts had ELN intermediate-risk AML, and 7 (24%) pts had ELN adverse-risk AML (4 [57%] by cytogenetics and 3 [43%] by genotype). Median time from diagnosis to start of induction was 4 days (range 0-43). For cytogenetically adverse-risk pts, median time from diagnostic bone marrow biopsy to receipt of adverse karyotype results was 8 days (7-14). Median time from start of induction to receipt of multigene NGS results for all pts was 15 days (3-32). Overall, 22 (76%) pts achieved remission. All genotypically adverse-risk pts (1 with mutated TP53 and 2 with mutated RUNX1) were refractory to induction, while 3 of 4 (75%) cytogenetically adverse-risk pts (1 with t(6;9), 1 with monosomy 7, and 2 with 11q23 abnormalities) achieved remission. Eight of the 29 (28%) pts proceeded to HCT, including 4 adverse-risk pts. Of the adverse-risk pts, all received myeloablative conditioning prior to HCT and 3 (75%) developed veno-occlusive disease (VOD), with 2 (50%) requiring defibrotide therapy. In favorable/intermediate-risk pts, 4 (18%) proceeded to HCT (2 intermediate-risk pts in first remission and 2 favorable-risk pts in second remission). Of these, 2 (50%) received myeloablative conditioning and 1 (25%) developed VOD. At last follow-up, 23 of 29 pts (79%) remained alive, with a median overall survival not reached (range 1-29 months) and a median EFS of 20 months (9-31). The percentage of ELN favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk pts who remained event-free at last follow-up was 75%, 33%, and 43%, respectively. Discussion: This single-center, retrospective cohort describes the outcomes of pts with "non-adverse" risk AML who received induction chemotherapy with 7+3+GO according to a pre-defined algorithm. Using this algorithm, 30% of all pts receiving 7+3-based inductions received GO. Of these, nearly 25% were ultimately found to have adverse-risk AML as defined by ELN 2017 criteria, largely driven by long turn-around times for karyotyping and NGS multigene panel results. No patient with genotypically adverse-risk AML by ELN criteria responded to induction chemotherapy, and 75% of cytogenetically adverse-risk pts who proceeded to HCT developed VOD. Routine use of 7+3+GO induction outside of the context of cytogenetically favorable-risk AML remains controversial, and further study is needed to define the role of GO, particularly for pts with ELN genotypically adverse-risk AML. Table Disclosures Gotlib: Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Chair of the Response Adjudication Committee and Research Funding, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: co-chair of the Study Steering Committee and Research Funding. Liedtke:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Muffly:Adaptive: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Servier: Research Funding. Mannis:AbbVie, Agios, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech: Consultancy; Glycomimetics, Forty Seven, Inc, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text