Patient Characteristics and Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Experience

Introduction: Clinical outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) are rarely reported as an isolated subgroup. Treatments vary little across age groups, and treatment intensity depends upon comorbid conditions and performance status. Optimal treatment strategies focused on disease behavior, biological factors, and the distinct needs of this subset of AML patients remain elusive. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to determine the characteristics and outcomes of AYA AML patients treated at a specialized adult leukemia cancer center in comparison to older adults with AML (40-60 years). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center from 2008-2018. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. Clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and survival outcomes were recorded for all patients. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and the impact of covariates were assessed using the Log-rank test. Finally, we compared the outcomes of AYA patients treated at our centre between 2015-2018 with older patients. Results: A total of 175 patients aged 18-39 were identified. Patient characteristics are shown in (Table 1). Cytogenetic were available in 163 patients. Based on MRC criteria, 27 (16%) were favorable risk, intermediate in 95 (54%), adverse in 39 (22%), and missing/failed in 14(8%). NPM1 status was available in 110 patients of whom 38 (35%) were positive. FLT3-ITD was available in 67 patients with 24 (36%) positive. Both mutations were present in 13 (54%) patients. There were no significant differences in terms of risk stratification based on cytogenetic and molecular markers based on age (18-29 vs.30-39) (P= 0.98). Most patients 172 (98%) received induction, 157 (91%) with 3+7, and 15 (9%) with FLAG-IDA. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 133 (77%) after first induction [120 (76%) after 3+7 and 11 (73%) after FLAG-IDA]. Induction related mortality was low (2%). Of the 39 who did not achieve CR, thirty-four patients received re-induction (13 FLAG-IDA, 16 NOVE-HiDAC, 5 others) with CR in 21 (62%). Overall, 154 (89.5%) achieved CR1. Sixty-four (42%) proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in CR1. 59 (38%) patients relapsed in CR1 with 8 (12%) relapsing post HSCT. Fifty-five (5 post HSCT) patients received reinduction with 30 (51%) (2 after HSCT) achieving CR2. Fifteen patients received HSCT in CR2. OS and DFS at 2 years were 62% (95% CI 0.53-0.69) and 50% (95% CI 0.41-0.57), respectively. Stratified by cytogenetic risk, OS was 81% for favorable risk, 61% for intermediate, and 50% for adverse risk (P=0.0001), respectively. DFS in these groups was 85%, 57%, and 46 % (P=0.0025), respectively. We further compared outcomes in the 18-29y and 30-39y age groups. The OS was 61.9% compared to 62.5% (P=0.91) and DFS of 52.1% compared to 47% (P=0.65) respectively. On univariate analysis for OS and DFS, cytogenetic risk stratification was the only significant variable (P=0.0004 and P=0.0042). We then compared the outcomes 67 sequential patients aged I8-39 treated from 2014-2018, with those of 176 sequential patients aged 40-60 treated during the same period (table 2). OS at 2 years was not statistically higher in the younger group compared to the older group (66.7% vs. 61.2%, P=0.372). While relapse rate was lower in older patients (15.5% vs. 22.6%, P=0.093), NRM was higher in older patients (29.7% vs. 18.8%,P=0.094). Conclusion: AYA pts. occupy a unique niche amongst AML as a whole. While treatment responses have improved in general, there may be potential for further gains in these patients. Increased tolerance for more intense treatment strategies as well as the incorporation of novel agents into standard treatment protocols may provide a means to optimize care in AYA patients. Finally, research is needed to elucidate biological mechanisms and predictors of disease behavior instead of arbitrary, age-stratified treatment schema. Disclosures McNamara: Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc.: Consultancy. Schimmer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medivir Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schuh:Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maze:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Gupta:Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Outcome of 472 Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Frontline Nilotinib: A Gimema CML WP Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-119182 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 458-458 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Gabriele Gugliotta ◽

Fausto Castagnetti ◽

Massimo Breccia ◽

Alessandra Iurlo ◽

Mariella D'Adda ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Age Groups ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Molecular Response ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Deep Molecular Response ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract BACKGROUND: In chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) nilotinib showed better efficacy compared to imatinib. The higher rates of deep molecular response with nilotinib may translate in more patients (pts) eligible for treatment discontinuation. On the other hand, cardiovascular toxicity may limit nilotinib use in selected groups of pts (e.g. elderly pts). AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety, overall and according to age, of first-line treatment with nilotinib in CML pts. METHODS: We analyzed response rates, events and outcome of 472 pts ≥ 18 y of age with CP CML, enrolled in clinical trials of the GIMEMA CML WP with nilotinib frontline. Pts were treated with: nilotinib 300 mg BID (n=276); nilotinib 400 mg BID (n=73); rotation of nilotinib 400 mg BID / imatinib 400 mg OD (3-month periods for each drug)(n=123). The median follow-up was 36 (3-82) months. Pts were further analyzed considering 3 age groups: 18-39 y (98 pts); 40-59 y (217 pts); and ≥ 60 y (157 pts). Definitions: Major molecular response (MR3): BCR-ABL≤0.1% (IS), with > 10.000 ABL copies; MR4: BCR-ABL≤0.01% (IS), with > 10.000 ABL copies. Events: permanent discontinuation of nilotinib for any reason, including adverse events, progression to accelerated/blast phase (AP/BP), or deaths. Arterial thrombotic events (ATEs): peripheral arterial obstructive disease, acute coronary syndrome, chronic ischemic heart disease, significant carotid stenosis and ischemic stroke, or other significant ischemic events. RESULTS: Overall, the cumulative incidences of MR3 by 12, 24, and 36 months were 75, 88, and 93%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of MR4 by 12, 24, and 36 months were 38, 63, and 76%, respectively. Events leading to permanent nilotinib discontinuation occurred in 132 (27.9%) pts. ATEs occurred in 33 (7% of pts) ATEs, corresponding to 19.7 ATEs/1000 pt-y. Fifteen (3.1%) pts progressed to AP/BP. Overall, 23 (4.9%) pts died, 11 of them after progression to AP/BP. The estimated 5-year OS was 93%. The sub-analysis according to age showed that: MR3 and MR4 rates were similar across the 3 age groups (cumulative incidences of MR4 by 24 months were 55, 62, and 70% in pts 18-39 y, 40-59 y, and ≥ 60 y, respectively; p=0.25). Progressions to AP/BP were: 6.1% in pts 18-39 y, 2.8% in pts 40-59 y, and 1.9% in pts ≥ 60 y. ATEs were: 0 in pts 18-39y, 4.1% (11.7/1000 pt-years) in pts 40-59 y, and 15.3% (41.3/1000 pt-years) in pts ≥ 60 y (no difference in ATEs was found between pts 60-69 y and those ≥ 70 y). The 5-y OS was 91, 97, and 89% in pts 18-39 y, 40-59 y, and ≥ 60 y, respectively (p=0.065). Death was always leukemia-related in pts 18-39 y (100%), while it was mainly leukemia-unrelated (75%) in pts ≥ 60 y. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: Nilotinib as first-line treatment of newly diagnosed CP CML pts showed high rates of deep molecular responses, few progressions to AP/BP, and a high OS. Deep molecular response were similar in all age groups; as expected, ATEs were more frequent in pts > 60 y. These data suggest that: in pts > 60 y, the high efficacy of nilotinib should be weighed against its potential toxicity; in pts < 60 years, nilotinib may be a very good choice, with high efficacy and low toxicity. Disclosures Gugliotta: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Castagnetti:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Levato:Novartis: Other: Advisory board. Abruzzese:Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Soverini:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Incyte Biosciences: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Foà:NOVARTIS: Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; CELTRION: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; INCYTE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; CELGENE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; ABBVIE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; ROCHE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; GILEAD: Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD. Cavo:AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pane:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Midostaurin in Combination with High-Dose Daunorubicin in 7+3 Induction for Acute Myeloid Leukemia with FLT3 Mutation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129331 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3896-3896

Author(s):

Yehuda E. Deutsch ◽

Robert Wilkinson ◽

Amanda Brahim ◽

Stephanie Boisclair ◽

Jose Sandoval-Sus ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cancer Center ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease with varied outcomes dependent on patient cytogenetic and mutational status. Thirty percent of adults with newly diagnosed AML have a mutation in the fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene. Midostaurin is a small molecule inhibitor that acts on multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, including FLT3. The RATIFY trial showed improved overall survival (OS) and event-free survival in patients treated with daunorubicin and cytarabine (7+3) plus midostaurin (Stone et al, NEJM 2017). In this trial, a dose of daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 was administered. High dose (HD) 90 mg/m2 daunorubicin significantly improved the rate of complete remission and overall survival, including in patients with FLT3-ITD (Luskin et al, Blood 2016). HD daunorubicin has also been shown to be more effective than idarubicin in patients with FLT3-ITD AML (Lee et al, J Clin Oncol 2017). This data raises the question of whether the combination of midostaurin and HD daunorubicin would further improve outcomes of FLT3 mutated AML patients, while maintaining a tolerable safety profile. The objective of this study is to describe the safety and efficacy endpoints of FLT3 mutated AML patients treated with HD daunorubicin plus midostaurin as part of induction therapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and molecular data of patients at Memorial Healthcare System, Moffitt Cancer Center, and Sylvester Cancer Center with newly diagnosed FLT3 mutated AML treated from May 1st, 2017 to July 1st, 2019. Clinical data was abstracted in accordance with institutional review board approved protocol. All patients were induced with HD daunorubicin 90 mg/m2 on days 1-3, cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1-7, and midostaurin 50 mg PO twice daily on days 8-21. Growth factor and antimicrobial support were used per institutional guidelines. Demographics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. OS was analyzed using Kaplan Meier method. Other efficacy outcomes were CR, CRi (assessed according to the European Leukemia Network Criteria for AML), proportion of patients needing re-induction, and proportion of patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Safety outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and early (30- and 60-day) mortality. Results: Twenty-six patients were included in the final analysis. Patient characteristics are outlined in TABLE 1. All patients were FLT3 mutated, as confirmed with molecular studies. The FLT3 subtype was ITD (high) in 3 patients, ITD (low) in 16 patients, TKD in 5 patients, and both in 2 patients. Seventy-seven percent of patients achieved a CR/CRi after one induction cycle, and 96.2% attained CR after two induction cycles. Median time to ANC and platelet recovery was 28 and 26 days, respectively. One patient died during the first 60 days, due to Enterococcus sepsis. The most common non-hematological AEs were nausea (77%), diarrhea (62%), mucositis (58%), rash (54%), and increased ALT (54%). Cumulative incidence of relapse in the cohort was 28% (n=7). Four patients relapsed pre-transplant and achieved CR2 with additional therapy. All 7 of these patients had co-occurring mutations of various types. Of the 20 patients who were considered transplant eligible, 13 (65%) underwent HSCT and 4 (20%) are pending transplant. Of the 13 transplanted patients, 3 experienced relapse post-transplant. After a median follow up of 14.5 months, median OS has not been reached. Conclusion: In our multi-center experience, induction with HD daunorubicin, cytarabine, and midostaurin is clinically effective and seems to be well tolerated. Short term mortality was low and AEs were manageable, with no unexpected safety signals. Also, CR/CRi rates were higher than previously reported, suggesting that the combination of HD daunorubicin and midostaurin may improve the outcomes of patients with FLT3 mutated AML. Future analyses with larger patient samples and longer follow up are warranted to further evaluate long-term safety and efficacy for this regimen. Figure Disclosures Sandoval-Sus: Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bradley:AbbVie: Other: Advisory Board. Talati:Agios: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Watts:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sallman:Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Research Funding; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Sweet:Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Stemline: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lancet:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services ; Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Outcomes of Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Older Versus Younger Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141966 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 27-27

Author(s):

Giacomo Adoncecchi ◽

Ambuj Kumar ◽

Rawan Faramand ◽

Hien D. Liu ◽

Farhad Khimani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Older Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Age Groups ◽

Group Versus ◽

Survival Outcomes ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Younger Patients ◽

Two Age Groups

Introduction: Previous studies have demonstrated that allogeneic haploidentical (haplo) peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) yields improved progression free survival (PFS) when compared to haplo bone marrow transplant (BMT) with PTCy, attributable to lower relapse without an increase in non-relapse mortality (NRM) (Bashey, et al. JCO. 2017). However, haplo PBSCT results in higher rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) which may negate these benefits in older patients who are more susceptible to transplant related toxicity. Thus, evaluation of the outcomes of haplo PBSCT with PTCy in older patients is warranted. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 121 adult patients with hematologic malignancies treated at the Moffitt Cancer Center with allogeneic T-cell replete PBSCT from a haplo donor followed by PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis. Data were extracted from the Moffitt BMT Research & Analysis Information Network (BRAIN) database. Myeloablative (n=70, 58%) and reduced intensity (n=51, 42%) conditioning regimens were included. Transplant related outcomes were compared between two age groups: <60 years (n=66) versus >60 years (n=55). Associations with transplant related survival outcomes were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard survival models. Fine and Gray regression models were used to assess associations of transplant related endpoints with competing risks. Kaplan-Meier curves and cumulative incidence function curves were also plotted. Results: The median age at the time of transplant was 42 years (range: 20-59) for the younger group and 66 years (range: 61-75) for the older group. The median follow-up was 17 months (range: 2-53) for the entire cohort. Younger patients were more likely to receive myeloablative conditioning (83% versus 27%, p<0.001). Baseline characteristics were otherwise similar. Neutrophil engraftment (>500/uL) by day 30 did not differ significantly between the younger and older group (98% versus 93%, p=0.26). However, the median time to neutrophil engraftment was faster in the younger group versus the older group (16 versus 21 days, p<0.001). Platelet engraftment (>20,000/uL) by day 90 was achieved in 92% in the younger group versus 76% in the older group (p=0.03). The time to platelet engraftment was faster in the younger group: 28 days versus 36 days (p=0.006). At day 100, the cumulative incidence (CuI) of grade II-IV acute GVHD in younger patients was 42% (95% CI 29-61%) and for older patients was 35% (95% CI 22-55%, p=0.82). The CuI for grade III-IV acute GVHD for the younger and the older groups were 8% (95% CI 4-25%) and 15% (95% CI 7-38%, p=0.23), respectively. At 2 years, the CuI of chronic GVHD was 67% (95% CI 55-82%) for younger patients versus 56% (95% CI 38-82%) for older patients (p=0.20). NRM for the younger group and the older group, respectively, was 6% (95% CI 2-16%) versus 19% (95% CI 11-34%) at 100 days and 14% (95% CI 6-30%) versus 22% (95% CI 13-37%) at 2 years (p=0.17). The CuI of relapse at 2 years was not significantly different between the two age groups, with the younger recipients having a CuI of 42% (95% CI 20-60%) and the older group 31% (95% CI 17-56%, p=0.70). The 2-year DFS was similar between the younger and older group, respectively: 51% (95% CI 36-66%) and 53% (95% CI 37-70%, p=0.72). Similarly 2-year overall survival (OS) for the younger group was 59% (95% CI 44-74%), while the older group was 66% (95% CI 52-80%, p=0.92). In multivariate analysis, NRM was superior in the younger group (HR=0.31, 95% 0.12-0.82, p=0.02). Otherwise, age was not associated with engraftment, risk of acute or chronic GVHD, relapse, DFS, or OS. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that outcomes following allogeneic haplo PBSCT with PTCy in patients >60 years approximate outcomes in patients <60 years. While NRM was inferior in the older patient group, this difference did not result in significant differences in long term OS or DFS. Instead, other variables such as the hematopoietic comorbidity index and the disease risk index were better indicators of survival outcomes. Additionally, these survival outcomes with haplo PBSCT with PTCy appear to be similar to prior published data with haplo BMT with PTCy in older patients (Kasamon, et al. JCO. 2015). Based on this study, haplo PBSCT with PTCy is an appropriate transplant platform for elderly patients. Disclosures Khimani: Bristol Myers Squibb-Moffitt-Alliance: Research Funding. Nishihori:Novartis: Other: Research support to institution; Karyopharm: Other: Research support to institution. Pidala:Syndax: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Johnson and Johnson: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Bejanyan:Kiadis Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2 Open-Label, Multicenter, Dose Optimization Clinical Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Profiles of Cfi-400945 As a Single Agent or in Combination with Azacitidine or Decitabine in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (TWT-202)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148808 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4432-4432

Author(s):

Gautam Borthakur ◽

Brian A. Jonas ◽

Emily L Roberts-Thomson ◽

Glenn C. Michelson ◽

Mark R Bray

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Acute Myeloid ◽

Refractory Aml

Abstract Background: CFI-400945 is a potent, selective, orally administered, first-in-class inhibitor of the serine/threonine kinase, Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4). PLK4 is a highly conserved master upstream regulator of centriole duplication and is critical for maintenance of genomic integrity. Aberrant expression of PLK4 results in a number of effects including the centrosome amplification often seen in aneuploid cancers, pointing to a potentially causative role for PLK4 in genome instability and cancer progression. A Phase 1 study has been completed evaluating CFI-400945 as a monotherapy in solid tumors, showing a tolerable safety profile and promising signs of activity. Given acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by genomic instability, CFI-400945 has been evaluated in pre-clinical and clinical studies in AML. In pre-clinical studies, CFI-400945 showed potent activity towards leukemia cell lines and primary human samples in vitro, as well as marked efficacy in two subcutaneous models of leukemia. A prior Phase 1 trial in AML was initiated at the Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PMCC), and of six patients evaluable for response, two (33%) achieved complete remission (CR) at 96 mg and 128 mg, and 3 patients (50%) had stable disease (with one patient having a 78% reduction in marrow blast count) at 64 mg (2 patients) and 96 mg [re: Murphy et al, ASH 2020]. Responses were seen in patients with adverse cytogenetics. The optimal dosing of CFI-400945 and its potential role as a combination agent are not yet clinically defined. Study Design and Methods: The study (TWT-202) has 4 parts, Part 1A (1A): a single agent dose escalation portion, Part 1B (1B): a food effect portion once the MTD of 1A is determined, and combinations with azacitidine (2A), and decitabine (2B). TWT-202 uses an updated version of investigational product which is identical in formulation to the drug used in the PMCC study, but which may result in higher exposures at a given dose. This study will therefore refine the dose through escalation cohorts. For parts 1A and 1B, patients with relapsed and/or refractory AML, MDS, or CMML after >1 prior therapy will be included. Patients with MDS or CMML must have progressed or had a lack of response after at least 4 cycles of hypomethylating agents. For parts 2A and 2B, patients should have relapsed and/or refractory AML or untreated MDS or CMML. Untreated patients who decline or are ineligible for intensive therapy may be included. The study will use a standard 3 + 3 design. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be defined as the dose level where the number of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) is <1 out of 6 at highest dose level below the maximally administered dose. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) markers will be assessed. Results: As of June 21, 2021, 2 patients had been enrolled into the study, one of the patients (50%) received >3 prior therapies (including venetoclax). Neither patient had had stem cell transplant at study entry. Both patients had secondary AML (one with antecedent MDS with excess blasts and the other with CMML). Both patients received 32 mg of CFI-400945 for 21 days followed by a 7-day rest. Both patients completed cycle 1 and neither experienced a DLT. Both patients experienced a single serious treatment emergent adverse event (SAE) of febrile neutropenia each, with neither event considered related to CFI-400945. There were 13 Grade 3 or greater TEAE's, including anemia, thrombocytopenia (3 events each), febrile neutropenia (2 events), agitation, angioinvasive fungal sinusitis, acute kidney injury, hypotension and neutropenia (1 event each). None of the grade 3 or greater TEAE's were considered related to CFI-400945. Neither patient responded to therapy at 32 mg and both came off treatment after one cycle due to progressive disease. PK and PD studies are pending. Conclusion: CFI-400945 has been generally well tolerated and TWT-202 continues to enroll in the Part 1A and Part 1B monotherapy cohorts. Updated safety, efficacy, PK, and PD data for the study will be presented at the time of the meeting. Disclosures Borthakur: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: Current Employment; ArgenX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Protagonist: Consultancy; Astex: Research Funding; Ryvu: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jonas: 47, AbbVie, Accelerated Medical Diagnostics, Amgen, AROG, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Forma, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GlycoMimetics, Hanmi, Immune-Onc, Incyte, Jazz, Loxo Oncology, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Sigma Tau, Treadwell: Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Travel reimbursement; AbbVie, BMS, Genentech, GlycoMimetics, Jazz, Pfizer, Takeda, Treadwell: Consultancy. Roberts-Thomson: Treadwell Therapeutics: Current Employment. Michelson: Treadwell Therapeutics: Consultancy. Bray: Treadwell Therapeutics: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Second Relapse of Pediatric Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report on Current Treatment Strategies and Outcome of the AML-BFM Study Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139317 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 24-24

Author(s):

Mareike Rasche ◽

Emma Steidel ◽

Martin Zimmermann ◽

Jean-Pierre Bourquin ◽

Heidrun Boztug ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Strategies ◽

Population Based ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytotoxic Treatment ◽

First Relapse ◽

Pediatric Aml

BACKGROUND: Children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) still experience high rates of relapse. Facing increasing survival after first relapse, it appears critically important to examine the consequences of a second relapse in more detail. However, there is no population-based data available in pediatric AML and no reliable statement about general survival, patients' characteristics or treatment approaches can be made. Herein, we report current survival results following second relapse from the BFM study group, which represents to our knowledge the largest available dataset for this subgroup of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2017, 1222 pediatric patients (age less than 18 years at initial AML diagnosis) with AML (no secondary leukemia, no Down syndrome, no acute promyelocytic leukemia) were registered in the population-based AML-BFM registry and trials in Germany, Austria, Czech Republic and Switzerland providing a longitudinal data collection with treatment, response rates, survival and disease characteristics. Central review of source documentation confirmed accuracy and consistency of all reported data. Only patients with a documented date of first and second complete remission (CR1 and CR2) and a diagnosed second relapse until the age of 21 are included. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute). All living patients were censored at the time of last follow-up, but no patient later than 03/27/2020. The median follow-up after diagnosis of second relapse was 6,5 years. RESULTS: In all registered patients, 7% (83 out of 1222) met the strict criteria for a second relapse. For further analyses patients with a date of second relapse diagnosis after 12/31/2017 (n=6), two patients with isolated CNS relapse, who did not receive systemic chemotherapy, one patient with an underlying syndrome and one patient with insufficient data have been excluded. The median age at second relapse was 9,2 years. Sixty percent (n=44) of the patients, who experienced a second relapse, did so within a year after first relapse diagnosis. Eighty percent (n=58) and 7% (n=5) had one or two previous HSCTs, respectively. Eighty-nine percent (n=65) received an anthracycline-containing re-induction (DNX-FLA) followed by FLA or another intensive treatment regimen before at first relapse. In contrast to the standardized treatment approaches in first relapse, patients with second relapse received a wide range of therapy. Forty-six patients (63%) have been treated with an intensive cytotoxic treatment (Table 1). Seventeen patients (23%) got palliation only. Among the 25 patients (35%) who proceeded to HSCT, 21 patients (88%) had a prior HSCT. Survival after second relapse was very poor with a 5-year pOS of 15±4% (see Figure 1A) and a considerable cumulative incidence of early deaths (until day 56 after diagnosis: CI ED 19±5%). Prognosis did not improve over time with consistent overall survival rates until 2017 (see Figure 1B). Causes of death include disease progression (n= 51, 70% of all patients), a combined SCT-related and disease-related cause (n=3, 5%) and SCT-related complications (n=4, 4%) or treatment-associated toxicity (n=5, 7%). The 5-year pOS was 2±2% for patients with an early second relapse vs. 33±9% for those experiencing a second relapse more than a year after the first. (p<0.0001; Figure 1C). The timing of a first relapse and age did not show any influence on overall survival. The best response achieved in the respective bone marrow sample after up to two cycles with cytotoxic treatment have been categorized. Out of 45 patients with conclusive data 31.1% (n=14) achieved a third CR with a pOS of 36±13%, while 62.2% of the patients showed a nonresponse to the treatment (n=28, pOS 7±5%) or no evidence of leukemia, but also no peripheral regeneration (6.7%, n=3, pOS 0±0%). CONCLUSION: These data provide new insights into treatment strategies, prognostic factors and outcome of children with second relapse in pediatric AML. As expected, survival is poor, but nonetheless possible in this increasingly relevant subgroup of patients. These data may serve as foundation for urgently needed international clinical trials for relapsed and refractory AML in children. Disclosures Bourquin: Servier: Other: Travel Support. Reinhardt:CLS Behring: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Impact of Cardiovascular Disease on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-138534 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 37-38

Author(s):

Gabriela Sanchez-Petitto ◽

Olga Goloubeva ◽

James Childress ◽

Tahreem Iqbal ◽

Jack Masur ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiovascular Disease ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Early Death ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Institutional Research ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Myeloid Malignancies ◽

Acute Myeloid

Background: The incidence of both myeloid malignancies and cardiovascular disease (CVD) increases with age, and cardiac disease is the most frequent cause of non-hematologic morbidity in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We aimed to study whether the presence of CVD is associated with worse outcomes in patients with myeloid malignancies. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 295 patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MDS or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN). CVD included congestive heart failure (CHF), coronary artery disease (CAD), arrhythmia, peripheral vascular disease, congenital heart disease and/or cerebrovascular accident. Endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), cardiac events and death within 60 days of treatment initiation. Patient characteristics were compared between those with CVD vs. no-CVD using the Fisher's exact and t-tests. The Kaplan-Meier approach was used to estimate OS. The multivariate Cox regression model was utilized to identify predictors of OS. Results: Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The study population included 92 patients (31%) with CVD and 203 (69%) without CVD, with a median age of 66 years (range 19-89) at diagnosis. Patients with CVD were older (p <0.001) and had higher rates of hypertension (p <0.001), hyperlipidemia (p<0.001), diabetes (p=0.04) and obesity (p=0.02) (Table 1). Treatment was hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based, anthracycline-based or other in 78%, 20% and 2% of CVD patients, compared to 56%, 41% and 3%, respectively, in no-CVD patients (p=0.001). Among the 228 AML patients, 20% vs. 48% of patients in the CVD vs. no-CVD groups achieved complete remission (CR), 24% vs. 22% achieved CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi), 1% vs. 3% achieved partial remission (PR), 20% vs. 17% were primary refractory (p <0.001), and 33.3% vs. 10.5% had early death. Among the 67 MDS and MDS/MPN patients (grouped as MDS), 12% vs. 6% CVD vs. no-CVD patients achieved CR, 6% vs. 0 CVD patients achieved CRi; 6% vs. 16% achieved hematologic improvement (HI); 0 vs. 2% of no-CVD patients achieved PR; and 12% vs. 4% had early death (p= 0.04). For AML patients, 1-, 2- and 3-year OS in CVD vs. no-CVD groups (Figure 1) was 46% vs. 70%; 34% vs. 53%; and 26% vs. 43%, respectively [HR 1.9, 95% CI = 1.35, 2.67]. For MDS patients it was 44% vs. 81%, 26% vs. 51%, and 26% vs. 49%, respectively [HR 2.52, 95% CI = 1.27, 5]. In a multivariable regression model accounting for age, performance status and karyotype, CVD was an independent prognostic factor for worse OS (Table 2). Smoking history (pack-years) did not impact OS. There was a trend toward fewer CVD than no-CVD patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation (17.4% vs. 27.6%, p=0.08). With a median follow-up of 15 months in both groups, 75% of AML and MDS patients with CVD were deceased, compared to 54% of no-CVD patients (p <0.0001). Cardiac adverse events were more frequent in CVD compared to no-CVD patients, including myocardial infarction/demand ischemia (13% vs 2%, p= 0.0003), arrhythmia (20% vs 10%, p= 0.01), and CHF exacerbations (27% vs 10%, p= 0.002). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that presence of CVD is a very important predictor of survival outcomes of patients with AML and MDS. As the incidence of both CVD and myeloid malignancies increases with age, a better understanding of their association and shared complications can translate into better therapeutic options. Disclosures Emadi: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KinaRx: Other: co-founder and scientific advisor; NewLink Genetics: Research Funding. Baer:Astellas: Other: Institutional research funding; AbbVie: Other: Institutional research funding; Incyte: Other: Institutional research funding; Forma: Other: Institutional research funding; Takeda: Other: Institutional research funding; Kite: Other: Institutional research funding; Oscotec: Other: Institutional research funding.

Download Full-text

Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax Combination Therapy Yields Superior Outcomes When Compared to Hypomethylating Agent Monotherapy in Patients ≥70 Years with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127772 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1368-1368 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Yumeng Zhang ◽

Hannah H Asghari ◽

Onyee Chan ◽

Dasom Lee ◽

Martine Extermann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Older Patients ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rates ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Entire Cohort ◽

Response Data

Background: Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have inferior outcomes when compared to younger patients. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) were established as the standard of care for patients who are unfit for intensive induction chemotherapy until HMA and venetoclax (HMA+ven) combination approval by the FDA in December 2018. Approval of HMA+ven was based on an early phase study which produced high response rates; however, the combination was not compared head-to-head with HMA alone. A randomized phase 3 study is currently underway. There is no data available comparing HMA+ven to HMA monotherapy in older patients (age ≥70 years), thus we aimed to characterize responses in older patients when treated with these two regimens. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and molecular data on 225 patients at Moffitt Cancer Center and Memorial Health System with newly diagnosed AML who were ≥ 70 years old and were treated with HMA monotherapy or HMA+ven combination. Clinical data was abstracted in accordance with institutional review board approved protocol. Patients were then divided in two subgroups: Cohort A) HMA monotherapy and B) HMA+ven combination. We calculated overall response rates (ORR) defined as patients achieving complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) or morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS). Fisher's Exact method was utilized to determine significance for categorical variables. All reported p-values are two sided. Next generation sequencing (NGS) results were analyzed using the TruSight Myeloid-54 gene panel with a sensitivity of 5%, and were characterized in patients treated in cohort B. Results: Among the 225 patients, 87% (n=196) were in cohort A and 13% (n=29) in cohort B. In cohort A, 36.7% were females compared to 27.6% in cohort B. Median age in both cohorts was 76 years (range: 70-90 years in cohort A) (range: 72-86 years in cohort B). Overall, 26% of the patients had adverse risk disease as defined by European Leukemia Net (ELN) classification in cohort A and 51.7% in cohort B. Baseline characteristics are described in Table 1. Overall response rate (ORR) of the entire cohort was 43.6% (n=92) (Table 2). ORR in cohort A was 25.5% (n=47) compared to 66.7% (n=18) in cohort B (p<0.001). The median time to response in cohort A was 3.8 mos and was 1.9 mos in cohort B. Looking only at the 66 patients with ELN-defined adverse risk, response data were available in 62 patients, and the ORR in both cohorts was 25.8% (n=16), and was significantly lower in cohort A compared to B (14.9% vs. 60%, respectively, p=0.001) (Figure 1). Among the 136 patients with favorable or intermediate risk disease, response data were available in 127 patients, and the ORR was 35.4% (n=45). In cohort A the ORR in favorable/intermediate patients was 28.9% (n=37), and in cohort B it was significantly higher at 100% (n=8) (p<0.001). Ten responding patients in cohort B had NGS data available at diagnosis and at the time of best response. Mutations cleared from the bone marrow in 60% (n=6) of these patients. With a median follow up of 11.7 months, the median overall survival (mOS) of the entire cohort was 15.03 months. The median follow-up time in cohort A is 46 months and in cohort B is 5.4 months, making assessment of relapse free survival or overall survival in cohort B premature. Early mortality rate was not different between the two cohorts (1.5% vs 3.4%, p=0.42). Conclusion: Our data provides convincing support that HMA+ven combination yields significantly higher response rates when compared to HMA monotherapy in newly diagnosed AML patients ≥70 years of age; an observation that is further strengthened by the short duration of follow-up in the HMA+Ven cohort. Responses are particularly striking in favorable and intermediate risk patients when treated with HMA+Ven. Overall our data supports the use of HMA+ven in the upfront setting for older patients with newly diagnosed AML. Additional follow-up in HMA+ven arm is needed to evaluate survival outcomes. Disclosures Kuykendall: Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria. List:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lancet:Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services . Komrokji:JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy. Sallman:Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Talati:Celgene: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria. Sweet:Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Effect of Age on Outcomes of Allogeneic Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146334 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3933-3933

Author(s):

Audrey M. Sigmund ◽

Justin Jiang ◽

Qiuhong Zhao ◽

Patrick Elder ◽

Ashley E. Rosko ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Older Patients ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has become an increasingly important consolidation treatment option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and as upfront therapy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Although the median age at diagnosis for both diseases is above 65 years, studies evaluating allo-SCT as treatment option for patients aged 65 years or older are limited. Further, as the population ages, the number of patients above 65 years considered for allo-SCT will continue to rise. Thus, the aim of our current investigation was to analyze outcomes based on age in AML/MDS patients <65 years old and ≥65 years old who received allo-SCT at the Ohio State University. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for all AML/MDS patients who received allo-SCT between January 1984 and December 2018 at our institution. Primary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS was counted from the day of transplantation to relapse or death. OS was defined as survival from the day of allo-SCT until death from any cause, with censoring of patients known to be alive at the time of last follow-up. PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan Meier Curves. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Cumulative incidence rates of aGVHD, cGVHD, relapse, NRM were estimated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks. Results: The cohort consisted of 900 AML/MDS patients, with 150 patients ≥65 years and 750 patients <65 years. The median age at transplant for the <65 years group was 49 years (range: 18-64 years) and 68 years (range: 65-76 years) for the ≥65 years group. Gender, race, Karnofsky score, and comorbidity index were similar between the two groups. A higher proportion of patients received myeloablative (MA) conditioning (65.1%) in the <65 years of age compared to 20% in the ≥65 years of age (p<0.01). A higher proportion of older patients had matched unrelated donors (57.3%), and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens (80%). The median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 176 days (range: 55-4920) for age <65 years and 168 days (range: 34-6079 days) for age ≥65 years. Median follow-up from allo-SCT was 5.9 years (range 0.8-35.9 years) and 3.4 years (range: 1.0-9.6 years) from transplantation among survivors. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were similar among the groups (p=0.35; 0.11). 3 year OS of 42.3% (95% CI: 38.7-45.8%) and PFS of 38.3% (95% CI: 34.8%-41.9%) were observed for age <65 years. The corresponding OS and PFS for age ≥65 years was 46.3% (95% CI: 37.9%-54.3%) and 43.0% (95% CI: 34.7%-51.0%), respectively (Figure 1a & 1b). Cumulative incidences of relapse at 1 year in <65 and ≥65 years were 26.4% and 25.3%, respectively (p=0.43). The cumulative incidence of NRM at 1 year in <65 and ≥65 years was 23.2% and 17.3%, respectively (p=0.12; Figures 1c and d). The incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were similar in the two age groups. The cumulative incidence of aGVHD at day 100 in <65 and ≥65 years was 40.3% (95% CI: 36.4%-44.2%) and 43.0% (95% CI: 34.9%-50.7%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of cGVHD at day 365 in <65 and ≥65 years was 40.8% (95% CI: 36.9%-44.6%) and 41.6% (95% CI: 33.6%-49.4%), respectively. Conclusion: Overall, our study suggests similar outcomes for elderly patients undergoing allo-HCT as compared to their counterparts, which is in line with prior studies. This likely is due to advancements in the transplant field, including the development of RIC and alternative donors, which have allowed greater access to transplant for older adults. Utilization of allo-HCT is feasible and should be considered for AML/MDS patients ≥65 years. Further research is underway to evaluate the important determinants of health status in older patients undergoing allo-HCT and to ultimately help predict NRM (BMT CTN 1704). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bumma: Amgen, Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi: Consultancy. Vasu: Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski: Takeda: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mims: Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Consultancy; Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Daiichi-Saynko: Consultancy. Brammer: Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy. Saad: Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; careDx: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; OrcaBio: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy. de Lima: Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Breaking the Glass Ceiling of Age in Transplant in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124804 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 782-782 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Pashna N. Munshi ◽

Parameswaran Hari ◽

David H. Vesole ◽

Artur Jurczyszyn ◽

Jan Zaucha ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Older Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Age Groups ◽

Karnofsky Performance Score ◽

Age Group ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Younger Patients ◽

Equity Ownership

Background: Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) is an effective treatment to achieve deep and durable remission in multiple myeloma (MM). Typically, AHCT is offered to patients <70 years of age, although the median age of diagnosis of MM is 70 years. We compared the outcomes of upfront AHCT across age groups for newly diagnosed MM in the era of novel therapies using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database. Methods: We analyzed the outcomes of 15,999 MM patients aged 20 years and older from the USA who received a single AHCT with melphalan conditioning within 12 months of diagnosis between 2013 and 2017 and reported to the CIBMTR. Multivariate analysis was performed for non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse/progression (REL), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox proportional hazards model with age at transplant in decades as the main effect. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. Because of the large sample size, a p-value of <0.01 was considered significant a priori. Results: Table 1 shows patient, disease and treatment characteristics by age group at diagnosis. All age groups had similar distribution of gender, race, ethnicity, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), comorbidity index (HCT-CI), stage III by Durie-Salmon/International Staging System. There was a higher proportion of high-risk cytogenetics in patients ≥70 years (30%), compared to age group 40-49 years (24%) and 20-39 years (20%) in this population. Older patients were more likely to be White compared to younger patients: 85% ≥70 compared to 64% 20-39 years. While 82% of the overall population received melphalan 200 mg/m2, 58% of the ≥70% received Mel 140 mg/m2. There were more ASCT performed in the ≥70-year age group in 2017 (28%) compared to 2013 (15%). Univariate outcomes by age groups shown in Table 2 revealed that 100-day NRM was higher in ≥70 years at 1% compared to younger patients (p <0.01) and 2-year OS was lower in ≥70 years at 86 (85-88)% compared to 60-69 years, 89 (88-89)% (p<0.01). When adjusted for other variables (Table 3), compared to reference age group of 60-69 years, patients ≥70 had similar NRM (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1, 1.7, p 0.06), REL (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.9, 1.1, p 0.6), PFS (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1, 1.2, p 0.2), and OS (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1, 1.4, p 0.02). The leading cause of death across all age groups was primary disease. Among the ≥70 years cohort, melphalan dose was a surrogate for worse outcomes including NRM at 100 days (Mel 140, 1 (1-2)% vs Mel 200 0 (0-1)%, p 0.003, PFS at 2 years Mel 140 64 (60-67)% vs Mel 200 69 (66-73)%, p 0.003, and OS at 2 years (Mel 140 85 (82-87)% vs Mel 200 89 (86-91)%, p 0.01) (Figure). Conclusions: This is the largest study of AHCT in older adults with MM. More MM patients ≥70 years are being transplanted in the US over time. While our data may highlight referral and access biases regarding which older patients may be referred for ASCT, our results confirm that patients ≥70 years can undergo transplant safely and achieve similar benefits as 60-69 years' old patients. Our results also suggest that melphalan 200 mg/m2 may be given safely in the ≥70 years population. While melphalan conditioning dose 140 mg/m2 in the ≥70 group is associated with worse outcomes, this is likely a surrogate for higher frailty and comorbidities in this cohort of patients. Our analysis confirms that AHCT has similar benefits in terms of disease control (REL and PFS) in both young and older MM patients. This benefit is seen even in a contemporaneous era where proteasome inhibitors and/or immunomodulator drugs are used in upfront treatment. Thus, AHCT remains a safe consolidation therapy across all age groups of MM patients. Disclosures Hari: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Vault: Equity Ownership; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kumar:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Shah:Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; University of California, San Francisco: Employment; Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Oncopeptides, Karoypharm, Surface Oncology, Precision biosciences GSK, Nektar, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teneobio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Qazilbash:Genzyme: Other: Speaker; Bioclinical: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Autolus: Consultancy. D'Souza:EDO-Mundapharma, Merck, Prothena, Sanofi, TeneoBio: Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; Pfizer, Imbrium, Akcea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Factors Associated with High Healthcare Utilization at the End-of-Life (EOL) for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139777 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 24-25

Author(s):

Dagny M. Vaughn ◽

P. Connor Johnson ◽

Annemarie D. Jagielo ◽

Matthew J. Reynolds ◽

Alison R. Kavanaugh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Psychological Distress ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Healthcare Utilization ◽

Older Patients ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Depression Symptoms ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Eol Care

INTRODUCTION: High rates of healthcare utilization at the EOL have been shown to negatively impact patients' quality-of-life (QOL), psychological distress, and caregivers' bereavement outcomes. Older patients (> 60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often experience high healthcare utilization at the EOL, including hospitalizations and chemotherapy close to death. Yet, factors associated with healthcare utilization at the EOL in this population are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of two supportive care studies including 168 deceased older patients with AML. We assessed patients' demographics, QOL [Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-Leukemia], and psychological distress [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)] at diagnosis. We used multivariate logistic regression models to examine the associations between demographic factors, patient-reported outcomes, and the following EOL care outcomes abstracted from the electronic health record: 1) hospitalizations in the last 7 days of life; 2) receipt of chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life; and 3) hospice utilization. RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 67 (range 20-100), and the majority identified as male (63.7% - 107/168) and white (88.1% - 148/168). Overall, 66.7% (110/165) of patients were hospitalized in the last 7 days of life, 51.8% (71/137) received chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life, 59.5% (100/168) died in the hospital, while 40.7% (70/168) utilized hospice services. In multivariate models, higher education (OR = 1.54, SE=0.24, P=0.006), and elevated depression symptoms (PHQ-9: OR=1.09, SE=0.04, P=0.028) at the time of diagnosis were associated with higher odds of being hospitalized in the last 7 days of life. In contrast, higher QOL at diagnosis (OR=0.98, SE=0.01, P=0.009) was associated with lower odds of being hospitalized in the last 7 days of life. Depression symptoms at the time of diagnosis as measured by the HADS was the only factor associated with the receipt of chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life (HADS-Depression: OR=1.10, SE=0.05, P=0.042). Patient-reported factors, including demographics, QOL, and psychological distress, were not associated with hospice utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with AML who reported higher levels of education, elevated depression symptoms, and lower QOL at the time of diagnosis were more likely to experience intense healthcare utilization at the EOL. These findings identify an AML population who are at higher risk for hospitalizations and additional chemotherapy at the EOL, and who may benefit from targeted interventions to optimize their EOL care. Disclosures Fathi: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; NewLink Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; TrovaGene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amphivena: Consultancy, Honoraria; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Blue Print Oncology: Consultancy. Hobbs:Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Brunner:Janssen: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Xcenda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Forty Seven, Inc: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy; Acceleron Pharma Inc.: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding. Luger:Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding; Acceleron: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Ariad: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Onconova: Research Funding. Bhatnagar:KaryoPharm Therapuetics: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. LeBlanc:UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; American Cancer Society, BMS, Duke University, NINR/NIH, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; AbbVie, Agios, Amgen, AstraZeneca, CareVive, BMS/Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Flatiron, Helsinn, Heron, Otsuka, Medtronic, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Welvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios, AbbVie, and Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text