Incidence and Predictors of Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease after Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Abstract Introduction: Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD)/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (SOS) is a serious complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) that is triggered, at least in part, by conditioning regimen-induced sinusoidal endothelial cell injury. VOD is thus commonly, but not exclusively, associated with myeloablative conditioning (MAC). The incidence of VOD in reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) HSCT was ≈2% in a single center series (Carreras et al. BBMT 2011), and risk factors for VOD in RIC HSCT remain poorly defined. Methods: We performed a retrospective review to confirm all cases of VOD among patients undergoing RIC HSCT at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center between January 2007 and June 2017. Diagnosis of VOD was based on modified Seattle or Baltimore criteria and/or liver biopsy or RUQ ultrasound in conjunction with fluid retention/ascites and hepatomegaly/RUQ pain. Diagnosis dates for all VOD cases were confirmed and clinico-laboratory values collected in the 10 days preceding the diagnosis. The same data were collected for a randomly selected control non-VOD RIC cohort, calculated from the median day of VOD onset derived from the cases. Acute kidney injury was defined as an absolute increase in creatine by 0.3 mg/dL or a relative increase of > 50% within a 48-hour period. Increased platelet transfusion requirement was defined as requiring a platelet transfusion on 2 consecutive days in the 7 days prior to VOD diagnosis, excluding transfusions for procedures. Incidence of VOD at D50 was calculated using a competing risk framework. Cox regression was used to identify significant features for predicting VOD. Survival was compared to a concurrent cohort of 76 patients with VOD after MAC HSCT recently published from our center (Roeker et al. BBMT 2018). Results: A total of 1492 patients underwent RIC HSCT, of whom 1070 (67.8%) received sirolimus (Sir) with tacrolimus (Tac) as part of the GVHD prophylaxis, and 1217 (82%) received intravenous busulfan(Bu) 3.2 or 6.4mg/kg with fludarabine(Flu) as conditioning. Twenty-six developed VOD (median day of diagnosis = d+26, range 5-48 days), for a cumulative incidence of 1.6% (95%CI 1.1%-2.4%). The median bilirubin at diagnosis was 1.1 mg/dL(range 0.6-5.2). Only 5 (19.2%) patients had a bilirubin of ≥2.0 mg/dL on the date of VOD diagnosis, although total bilirubin peaked at ≥ 2 mg/dL in 17 of 26 (65.4%). VOD was mild/moderate in 16 and severe in 10 patients. Sixteen had received ursodiol as VOD prophylaxis. Defibrotide was used as treatment in 17 cases. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 54% from VOD onset. VOD was associated with increased risk for NRM (HR 4.02, 95% CI 2.1-7.7, p<0.0001), but not OS (HR 1.53, 95% CI 0.9-2.6, p= 0.11), PFS (HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.9-2.4, p= 0.17) or relapse (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.3-1.5, p= 0.35). Compared to patients who developed VOD after MAC, OS at 2 years after VOD was better in RIC patients (54% vs. 28%, p=0.04). Use of ursodiol was not associated with any reduction in VOD incidence. In the multivariable model, the only significant risk factor for VOD was use of Sir with Tac for GVHD prophylaxis (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.26-12.17). Among RIC Bu/Flu patients who received Tac/Sir based GVHD prophylaxis, 18/877 (2.1%) developed VOD, compared to 1/351 (0.28%) in RIC Bu/Flu patients without Sir, p <0.01. To assess clinico-laboratory predictors of VOD patients in the 10 days prior to VOD diagnosis, we compared the 26 VOD cases to 65 randomly selected control RIC patients. The groups were well matched with regards to baseline characteristics. In the 10 days prior to VOD diagnosis (or D+26 for controls), VOD patients were significantly more likely to develop acute kidney injury, peak creatinine >1, increasing platelet transfusion requirements, and increasing Tac and Sir trough levels (Table 1, Fig 1). Conclusions: The incidence of VOD in this large modern cohort of 1492 RIC HSCT patients was 1.6%, and was associated with the use of Sir with Tac. Onset of VOD in RIC patients was delayed (median D+26 vs. D+14) and 2 yr-OS is superior compared to MAC patients. Only 19% of the RIC VOD cases met the bilirubin threshold for Baltimore and Seattle criteria at diagnosis, suggesting that the rise in bilirubin is a later event in these RIC VOD cases, whereas increasing platelet transfusion requirements, sudden rise in Tac and Sir levels, elevated serum creatinine and acute renal injury appear to be early clinical predictors. Disclosures Nikiforow: Kite Pharma: Consultancy. Antin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Soiffer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ho:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Poor Outcomes of HLA-Mismatched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and High Ferritin Levels after a Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimen in Patients with Advanced Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130338 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5742-5742

Author(s):

Han Bi Lee ◽

Jae-Ho Yoon ◽

Gi June Min ◽

Sung-Soo Park ◽

Silvia Park ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Hematopoietic Cell ◽

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Reduced Intensity

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) preconditioning intensity, donor choice, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for advanced myelofibrosis (MF) have not been fully elucidated. Thirty-five patients with advanced MF were treated with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HCT. We searched for matched sibling (n=16) followed by matched (n=10) or mismatched (n=5) unrelated and familial mismatched donors (n=4). Preconditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine (total 150 mg/m2) and busulfan (total 6.4 mg/kg) with total body irradiation≤ 400cGy. All showed engraftments, but four (11.4%) showed either leukemic relapse (n=3) or delayed graft failure (n=1). Two-year overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 60.0% and 29.9%, respectively. Acute GVHD was observed in 19 patients, and grade III-IV acute GVHD was higher with HLA-mismatch (70% vs. 20%, p=0.008). Significant hepatic GVHD was observed in nine patients (5 acute, 4 chronic), and six of them died. Multivariate analysis revealed inferior OS with HLA-mismatch (HR=6.40, 95%CI 1.6-25.7, p=0.009) and in patients with high ferritin level at post-HCT D+21 (HR=7.22, 95%CI 1.9-27.5, p=0.004), which were related to hepatic GVHD and high NRM. RIC allo-HCT can be a valid choice for advanced MF. However, HLA-mismatch and high post-HCT ferritin levels related to significant hepatic GVHD should be regarded as poor-risk parameters. Disclosures Kim: Handok: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Hanmi: Consultancy, Honoraria; AGP: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SL VaxiGen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Honoraria; BL & H: Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria; Yuhan: Honoraria; Sanofi-Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lee:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Achillion: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I/I Clinical Trial for the Evaluation of Bortezomib within the Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen (RIC) and Post-Allogeneic Transplantation As Gvhd Prophylaxis Among High-Risk Myeloma Patients. EudraCT: 2005–004858-27

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3025.3025 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3025-3025

Author(s):

Jose Antonio Perez-Simón ◽

Teresa Caballero-Velazquez ◽

Cristina Encinas ◽

Cristina Castilla-Llorente ◽

Rodrigo Martino ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Disease Status ◽

Allogeneic Transplantation ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Abstract 3025 Introduction: Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the only curative treatment for MM, it is associated to a high morbility and mortality. Moreover, relapses are common after allo-RIC. Accordingly, new strategies are required to reduce both the risk of relapse and the toxicity of the procedure. As we have previously demonstrated, Bz induces a selective depletion of alloreactive T-cells and has immunomodulatory properties which might be of potential benefit for GVHD control. The primary end point of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of allo-RIC in terms of response when Bz was added as part of a reduced intensity conditioning prior to allo-SCT. Secondary end points included incidence of GVHD and analysis of the toxicity of the procedure when Bz is also administered post-infussion as part of the GVHD prophylaxis. Method: Prior to allo-RIC, patients received two cycles of Bz plus dexamethasone. Conditioning consisted of fludarabine (30 mg/m2 intravenously on days -9 to -5) and melphalan (70 mg/m2 intravenously on days -4, -3) plus Bz 1, 3mg/m2 on day - 11 and -2. GVHD prophylaxis included cyclosporine (CsA) and methotrexate for the first 9 patients and CsA plus MTX and Bz on days +3 and +7 for the remaining 7 patients. From day +50 post allo-RIC 7 cycles of Bz (+1, +8, +15) were administered, the first two cycles every 28 days and the rest every 56. Results: 16 patients from the Twenty-one initially enrolled, were evaluable. All 16 patients had received at least 2 lines of therapy including autologous-SCT. Disease status was CR or nCR in 4 patients, 9 had PR and the remaining 3 patients had relapsed / progressive disease. 15 patients maintained or improved status at transplant including all × patients with active disease at transplant. Eight patients (50%) relapsed, four with extramedullary involvement. No patient developed grade 4 aGVHD.Grades 2–3 aGVHD occurred in 6 patients (37%). Interestingly, two out of the nine (29%) patients who received Bz on days +3 and 7 developed grades 2–3 acute GVHD as compared to four of the nine (44%) who did not receive it. In terms of toxicity, one patient did not achieve platelet engraftment and 2 patients developed peripheral neuropathy requiring treatment withdrawal. 8 patients died, four of them due to relapse (MRT: 25%). With a median follow-up of 457 days overall survival was 46%. Conclusions: The current trial is the first evaluating the efficacy and safety of Bz as part of a reduced intensity conditioning regimen among patients with high risk MM undergoing allogeneic transplantation. Regarding the efficacy of the procedure all but one patient improved disease status post-alloRIC although relapse rate was still high in this heavily pretreated population. In addition, Bz post-alloSCT is well tolerated and may decrease the incidence of GVHD. Disclosures: Perez-Simón: Janssen-Cilag: Patents & Royalties. Off Label Use: This study evaluates the efficacy of Bortezomib as part of a reduced intensity conditioning regimen among patients with high risk MM undergoing allogeneic transplantation. Rosiñol:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. San Miguel:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Haploidentical Vs. Matched Unrelated Donor Transplants Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Lymphoma: A Joint CIBMTR/EBMT Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-151197 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 174-174

Author(s):

Alberto Mussetti ◽

Abraham S. Kanate ◽

Tao Wang ◽

Meilun He ◽

Mehdi Hamadani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Retrospective Studies ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Matched Unrelated Donor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Introduction: Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is a standard GVHD prophylactic approach for haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haploHCT). Retrospective studies in patients with lymphoma showed lower chronic GVHD in haploHCT with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis compared to matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT with calcineurin-based GVHD prophylaxis (+/- ATG). Recent retrospective studies showed that using MUD donors was better than haplo donors when PTCy and reduced-intensity conditioning are used for ALL, AML or MDS. However, no studies to date have compared haploHCT and MUD HCT when PTCy is used in the setting of lymphomas. Methods: 2155 adults (730 CIBMTR, 1425 EBMT) aged =/>18 years who received their first haploHCT or MUD HCT (8/8 match at HLA-loci A, B, C and DRB1) using PTCy from 2010-2019 for lymphoma were included. The majority of both MUD (n=312; 14%) and haplo (n=1843; 86%) HCTs received reduced intensity/non-myeloablative conditioning (n=1655; 77%) using a peripheral blood stem cell graft (n=1379; 64%) and a three-drug GVHD prophylaxis (PTCy + calcineurin inhibitor + MMF, n=1805; 84%). Hodgkin's lymphoma was the most common indication (n=899; 42%) followed by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=525; 24%), T-cell lymphomas (n=328; 15%), mantle cell lymphoma (n=234; 11%) and follicular lymphoma (n=169; 8%). Most had chemosensitive disease at transplant (n=1781; 83%). Some main characteristics of the two cohorts are shown in Figure 1. Median follow-up among survivors was longer for haplo-HCT (36 and 31 months for the CIBMTR and EBMT cohort, respectively) than MUD-HCT (24 and 17 months, respectively). Cox proportional hazards models were built using stepwise forward and backward selection with a selection/retention threshold of 0.05. Any clinical variables that did not meet the proportional hazard assumption were adjusted for by stratification, and regression models were built to compare outcomes between donor types. Center effect was adjusted in all the models. Results: Figures 2 and 3 show the multivariate analysis results. Overall survival was 73% (71-75%) at 1 year and 65% (63-67%) at 2 years. Relapse was 21% (20-23%) at 1 year and 26% (24-28%) at 2 years. All outcomes favored MUD over haplo donors with the use of PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis for both. Conclusions: Patients with lymphoma receiving PTCy HCT from MUDs demonstrated better outcomes than those with haplo donors in this retrospective study of CIBMTR and EBMT data Future prospective studies are needed to confirm and clarify the reasons for these differences. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Mussetti: GILEAD: Other: Clinical trials participation, Research Funding; TAKEDA: Honoraria; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Other: Clinical trials participation. Hamadani: Janssen, Incyte, ADC Therapeutics, Omeros, Morphosys, Kite: Consultancy; Sanofi, Genzyme, AstraZeneca, BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals and Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Glass: Novartis: Consultancy; Riemser: Research Funding; Helios Klinik Berlin-Buch: Current Employment; Kite: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Blaise: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Paczesny: Medical University of South Carolina: Patents & Royalties: inventor on the ST2 bispecific antibody patent application. Dreger: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Lee: AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Other; Kadmon: Research Funding; National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Sureda: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Speakers Bureau; Bluebird: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Roche: Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

No Influence of Peripheral Blood CD34+ and CD3+ Graft Cell Counts on Outcomes after Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112453 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4577-4577

Author(s):

Alice Garnier ◽

Thierry Guillaume ◽

Pierre Peterlin ◽

Amandine Le Bourgeois ◽

Alix Duquesne ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cell Content ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Introduction Although associated with a higher incidence of acute GVHD, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are increasingly used for haploidentical allogeneic transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY). Data reporting whether or not the composition of the PBSC graft impacts outcomes of patients receiving PTCY are still scarce. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included all adults allografted in our department who received a PBSC allotransplant after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) with PTCY. Grafts originated from a matched or haploidentical donor and recipients received a Baltimore-based or a Clo-Baltimore (where fludarabine is replaced by clofarabine)-based RIC regimen. All patients received cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetyl and PTCY as GVHD prophylaxis. CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell contents were considered to study their potential impact on the following outcomes: OS, DFS, GRFS, acute grade 2-4 and 3-4 GHVD and chronic GVHD, early immune reconstitution (IR, lymphocytes and monocytes counts at days+30 and +100 post-transplant, CD4+, CD8+, NK and B cells at day+100 post-transplant). Results Between November 2013 and May 2017, 77 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 48 males and 29 females with a median age of 58 years (range: 22-71) and a median follow-up for alive patients of 29.2 months (range: 8.4-53.2). Initial diagnoses were mainly acute myeloid (n=21) or lymphoid (n=6) leukemia, lymphoma (n=13), myelodysplastic syndrome (SMD, n=12), myelofibrosis (n=9). Thirty-eight patients were in complete remission at time of transplant (CR1 n=23; CR2 n=12, CR3 n=3) while 22 had active disease and 17 were in partial remission. Donors were sibling in 6 cases, matched unrelated (MUD) in 14, 9/10 mismatched unrelated in 1 and haploidentical in 56. Forty patients received a Baltimore RIC regimen and 37 a Clo-Baltimore RIC regimen. Analyses were performed in July 2018. Median infused CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell counts, based on recipients' weight, were 7.8 106/Kg (range: 1.45-14.24) and 22.23 107/kg (range: 1.95-66.75), respectively. All patients but three engrafted, the latter being 1 patient transplanted with a haplodonor, 1 with a MUD and 1 who died of infection during induction. Two-year OS, DFS and GRFS were 62.6% (52-74), 51.5% (40-63) and 36.6% (27-49), respectively. The incidences of grade 2-4 and 3-4 acute GVHD were 46.7% and 14.2%, respectively, while the incidence of moderate + severe chronic GVHD was 14%. Relapse occurred in 26 patients and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 15.5%. Baltimore vs Clo-Baltimore patients shared similar median infused CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell counts and outcomes. The same was observed for patients allografted with a haplodonor or not, except for the incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD which was significantly higher for the haplo group at 57.1% vs 19% (p=0.006). This difference was first attributed to the higher CD3+ cell content infused in this group (median: 24.05 vs 18.85 107/kg, p=0.04). However, using the median of CD3+ cell graft content as threshold, the incidence of acute grade 2-4 GVHD was not different between low vs high groups when considering haplo patients. This suggests that it was rather the type of donor that did influence acute GVHD occurrence and that PTCY is of particular interest for GVHD prophylaxis when using matched donors. Partitioning the patients according to the median level of CD34+ cells, there was no difference in terms of 2-year OS (57.1% vs 60.7%, p=0.53), DFS (44.5% vs 55.6%, p=0.47) , GRFS (31.7% vs 44.3%, p=0.32), acute grade 2-4 (59% vs 39%, p=0.13) and 3-4 GVHD (17% vs 6.4%, p=0.29), and moderate + severe chronic GVHD (19.5% vs 20%, p=0.57). Similarly, partitioning patients according to median graft CD3+ cell content, outcomes were similar for 2-year OS (64.8% vs 55.8%,p=0.45), DFS (46.3% vs 55.8%, p=0.62), GRFS (36.3% vs 40.4%, p=0.63), acute grade 2-4 (44.7% vs 56.4%, p=0.42) and 3-4 GVHD (10.5% vs 15.3%, p=0.76), and moderate + severe chronic GVHD (14% vs 17.6%, p=0.91). Finally, early IR was not influenced by CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell contents. Conclusion: PBSC CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell contents have no impact on survivals, GVHD incidence nor early IR after a RIC allotransplant using PTCY as GVHD prophylaxis. As a consequence, there is no need to manipulate the graft nor cap the stem cells dose to be infused. These data have to be confirmed prospectively on a larger cohort of patients. Disclosures Gastinne: Millennium/Takeda: Honoraria. Moreau:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Safety of Anti-NKG2A Blocking Antibody Monalizumab As Maintenance Therapy after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Phase I Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150730 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1817-1817

Author(s):

Raynier Devillier ◽

Sabine Furst ◽

Agnes boyer Chammard ◽

Thomas Pagliardini ◽

Samia Harbi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Nk Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Receptor Saturation ◽

Privately Held

Abstract Background Following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT), the phenotype and function of circulating NK Cells are altered; notably NK cells display an immature (CD56-bright/KIR -/CD57 -/NKG2A +) phenotype and a low cytotoxic activity. Since NK cells have demonstrated anti-leukemic activity in the context of Allo-HCT while less prone to induce GVHD than T cells, we hypothesized that NKG2A inhibition using the checkpoint inhibitor monalizumab (humanized IgG4 blocking monoclonal antibody) could improve NK cell mediated graft-versus-tumor effect, without triggering graft-versus-host disease. We thus performed the first clinical trial evaluating the safety of monalizumab as a prophylactic treatment after Allo-HSCT (NCT02921685). Method The objective was to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of a single infusion of monalizumab administered on day+75 or thereafter following Allo-HSCT. Inclusion criteria were: 1) adult patients who underwent first Allo-HSCT for hematological malignancy; 2) no prior history of GVHD, 3) reduced toxicity conditioning regimen, 4) ATG or PT-Cy based GVHD prophylaxis, and 5) GVHD prophylaxis with cyclosporine A ongoing at the time of monalizumab infusion. Four dose levels were investigated in this dose escalation study (0.04, 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0 mg/kg). Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined by the occurrence of any grade 3 to 4 monalizumab-related adverse event within 28 days after infusion, including grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD and moderate to severe chronic GVHD. In case of DLT, a Bayesian continuous reassessment model (CRM) was used to predict the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) after each series of 3 patients treated at a given dose level. It was planned to treat 18 patients. Beyond clinical safety, blood samples were collected for NK and T cell immunomonitoring and receptor saturation assay. Results Fifteen patients received monalizumab at a median time of 83 days (range: 75-103) after Allo-HSCT (3 at 0.04 mg/kg, 3 at 0.1 mg/kg, 3 at 0.3 mg/kg, and 6 at 1 mg/kg). Patients were transplanted for hematological diseases (9 AML, 3 MDS, 1 lymphoma, 1 CLL and 1 myelofibrosis), from a matched sibling (n=8), matched unrelated (n=6) or haploidentical donor (n=1). No DLT was observed during the dose escalation process or among the 6 patients treated at the highest dose level, justifying study early termination after 15 patients. Two patients developed transient low grade GVHD that spontaneously resolved without treatment (1 grade I acute GVHD on day+8 and 1 mild chronic GVHD on day+118). Systemic steroid requiring GVHD occurred in 3 patients (20%): 1 severe overlap GVHD (day+42, CR after treatment), 1 severe chronic GVHD (day+80, death from GVHD) and 1 late severe chronic GVHD after cyclosporine tapering for mixed chimerism (day+149, complete remission [CR] after treatment). No disease recurrence was observed, except for one patient with myelofibrosis who relapsed 3 years after monalizumab infusion. At a median follow up of 22 months (3-48) after monalizumab infusion, 13 out of 15 patients are in CR from their underlining malignancy without GVHD and immunosuppressive treatment at last contact. At the dose of 1 mg/kg, receptor saturation assays (RSA) showed persistent binding of monalizumab on peripheral blood NK cells. Indeed, more than 90% of NKG2A-positive NK cells were positive for monalizumab detection (Anti-IgG4-PE) until at least 14 weeks post treatment. Conclusions Monalizumab can be safely administered after Allo-HSCT, with prolonged persistence on circulating NK cells. In the absence of DLT, MTD was not reached. Future trials will aim at measuring the clinical efficacy of monalizumab in this context, alone or in combination therapy. Disclosures boyer Chammard: Innate Pharma: Current Employment. Chabannon: Sanofi SA: Other: Travel Support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Terumo BCT: Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi Biotech: Research Funding; Fresenius Kabi: Research Funding; EBMT: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vey: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; BIOKINESIS: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SERVIER: Consultancy; JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Consultancy. Olive: ImCheck Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alderaan Biotechnology: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergence Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blaise: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Excellent Survival and Immune Reconstitution Following Matched/Mismatched Unrelated and Mismatched Related Transplantation in Adult Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: Updated Results from a Single Center Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-132113 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2043-2043

Author(s):

Amer Assal ◽

Diane George ◽

Monica Bhatia ◽

Divaya Bhutani ◽

Christian Gordillo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Unrelated Donors ◽

Grade Ii

Introduction: The only cure for sickle cell disease (SCD) is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) although autologous HSCT of genetically engineered hematopoietic stem cells is promising. Lack of suitable matched related donors (MRD) is a major limitation driving interest in improving outcomes using unrelated donors. While excellent outcomes are achieved with non-myeloablative MRD HSCT in adults (Hsieh et al, 2009 and 2014), results from matched unrelated donor (MUD) HSCT have been limited by excessive graft versus host disease (GVHD) and treatment-related mortality (Shenoy et al, 2016). Here we present updated follow up of our institutional experience using MUD and mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) in comparison to patients with MRD. Methods: Eligibility for HSCT included frequent pain crises requiring hospitalization and evidence of end-organ damage. Non-myeloablative conditioning with alemtuzumab and 3 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) was used for MRD HSCT (n=7), whereas patients without an MRD were transplanted using MUD, MMUD or haploidentical grafts (n=6) on a previously reported institutional protocol after conditioning with alemtuzumab (54 mg/m2), fludarabine (180 mg/m2), and melphalan (140 mg/m2), using a CD34+ selected graft with CD3+ cell add back. MRD recipients received sirolimus as GVHD prophylaxis. Non-MRD recipients initially received tacrolimus as GVHD prophylaxis (n=1) but subsequently received sirolimus (n=5) due to the first patient developing posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). All grafts were G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood grafts and all patients underwent RBC exchange to achieve Hgb S <30%. Data is reported using n (%) or median (range) and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables. Results: Median follow up is 21.7 months (range 4.7 - 63.4). Median age for MRD recipients was 28.7 (21.4 - 35.5) years and 22.8 (18.5 - 34.6) for non-MRD recipients. Of note, the MRD group included one patient with a renal allograft from the same donor and another with stage V renal disease awaiting a kidney transplant. All patients where homozygous for hemoglobin S except one who had hemoglobin Sβo -thalassemia in the MRD group, and another heterozygous for hemoglobin S and C in the non-MRD group. Patients in the MRD group received unmanipulated grafts with a median of 14 (6.2 - 16.9) x 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg. Non-MRD recipients received CD34 - selected grafts with a median of 7.8 (4.1 - 15.1) x 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg with 2.2 x 10E5 (0.1 - 2.5) CD3+ cells add back. No growth factors were used post-transplant. All patient engrafted with no cases of graft failure. Median time to engraftment was significantly longer for the MRD group at 25 (22 - 30) vs 19 (13 - 21) days, p=0.003. Two patients in the MRD group developed acute/late acute GVHD (2 grade II), and 3 patients in the non-MRD group (1 grade II, 2 grade III), 2 of which developed in while switching immune suppression due to PRES. All GVHD cases were steroid responsive and resolved. Three patients in the non-MRD group developed PRES and none in the MRD group. There were no cases of treatment related mortality and all patients are alive and free of SCD. As both groups received alemtuzumab, and the non-MRD group received a CD34-selected graft, we examined lymphocyte subset reconstitution at day 100 and 1 year post-HSCT. The most striking difference was in median CD8+ T cell counts at day +100 which were lower in the non-MRD group approaching significance [101 (43 - 2995) vs 6.5 (3 - 2233) cells/uL, p=0.055, for the MRD and non-MRD respectively]. CD8+ T-cell counts were not significantly different at 1 year [402 (184 - 1066) vs 774 (143 - 1002) cells/uL, p<0.99]. Results from other lymphocyte subsets including CD4+ T-cells, NK cells and B cells are shown in table 1 and were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Of note, early donor T-cell chimerism at D100 was not significantly different between MRD and non-MRD groups [27.0 (18.0 - 50.0) % vs 37.5 (3.0 - 80.0) %, p=0.83] whereas at 1-year, MRD group donor T cell chimerism was significantly lower [53.5 (17.0 - 65.0) % vs 82.7 (69 - 90), p=0.01]. Conclusion: We demonstrate excellent outcomes with 100% survival and no graft rejection following matched and mismatched unrelated donor HSCT for adult patients with severe SCD. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results and further delineate the impact of T-cell subset reconstitution on early-post transplant complications. Disclosures Assal: Incyte corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; boston biomedical: Consultancy. Bhatia:BMS: Consultancy; Vertex Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bhutani:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lentzsch:Abbvie: Consultancy; Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Honoraria; International Myeloma Foundation: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Columbia University: Patents & Royalties: 11-1F4mAb as anti-amyloid strategy; Caelum Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Proclara: Consultancy. Reshef:Magenta: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Atara: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Myeloablative Versus Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Patients with Prior Myelodysplastic Syndrome/ Myeloproliferative Disorders: An ALWP of EBMT Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v130.suppl_1.907.907 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽

pp. 907-907

Author(s):

Bipin N. Savani ◽

Ariane Boumendil ◽

Myriam Labopin ◽

Jürgen Finke ◽

Matthias Stelljes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Myeloproliferative Disorders ◽

Registry Study ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) includes a heterogeneous group of diseases evolved from myelodysplasia, myeloproliferative disorders (MDS/ MPN), bone marrow failure syndrome or after exposure to leukemogenic agents such as chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy for malignant hematological (other malignant hematological diseases) or solid tumors. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potentially curative therapy but relapse is a frequent cause of failure after HCT occurring in more than 50% of patients. No systematic large analysis of HCT for sAML has evaluated risk factors and outcome based on a prior diagnosis of MDS or MPN. Therefore, the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) performed a multicenter retrospective registry study on patients undergoing HCT for sAML following MDS/MPN comparing myeloablative (MAC) to reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). ALWP-EBMT supplemental data forms were used to establish the occurrence of any prior hematological disorder or non-hematological malignancy as well as details of cytogenetic data and therapy. We studied 811 patients with a previous diagnosis of MDS/ MPD and available cytogenetic data who had received HCT for sAML from an HLA-identical sibling (MRD, n=344 [42.4%]) or unrelated donor transplant (URD- 9/10 or 10/10) during 2000-16. Median time from diagnosis (sAML) to transplant was 137 days (IQR 94-204). Median age at HCT was 59.57 years (IQR 52-65). sAML with adverse cytogenetics accounted for 269 (33.2%) patients. At the time of HCT, 401 (49.5%) patients were in CR1 and 367 (45.3%) had active disease. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 32 months (IQR, 11-62). Regimen intensity was assessed by EBMT criteria. MAC regimens were used in 326 (40.2%) patients while 485 (59.8%) received RIC. Older patients were more likely to receive RIC than MAC regimens (p<0.001). Most patients received peripheral blood stem cell grafts (n=731 [90.3%]; MAC 85.6% vs RIC 93.4%, p<0.001). A total of 534 (67.9%) patients were cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositive pre-HCT. There were no significant differences in disease characteristics (e.g. disease status at transplant, cytogenetic risk category), donor source, year of transplant or CMV serology status between MAC and RIC cohorts. All patients received a calcineurin inhibitor-based combination as prophylaxis against graft versus host disease (GVHD) and 516 (63%) received in vivo T-cell depletion (rATG 474 (58%). A total of 667 (95.2%) patients engrafted (MAC 94.5% vs. RIC 95.6%; p=0.596). Acute GVHD (grade II-IV) within 100 days of HCT occurred in 24% (95% CI, 21-27; MAC vs. RIC, p=0.126) and 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 33% (95% CI 30-37; MAC vs. RIC, p=0.150). Three-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 41% (95% CI, 38-45; MAC 37% [31-42] vs. RIC 45% [40-49], p=0.029) and 25% (95% CI, 22-28%, MAC 25% [20-30] vs. RIC 25% [21-29], p=0.959), respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS) at 3 years were 40% (95% CI, 37-44; MAC 44% [38-50] vs. RIC 38% [33-43], p=0.041) and 34% (95% CI, 31-38; MAC 38% [33-45] vs. RIC 31% [27-36], p=0.032), respectively (Figure 1). In multivariate analysis by Cox Regression, a higher RI was seen after RIC regimens (HR 1.72 [1.16-2.55]; p=0.0063). Patients receiving RIC regimens had a higher risk of chronic GVHD (HR 1.37 [1.02-1.84], p=0.0389). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was equivalent in MAC and RIC groups.MAC regimens were associated with superior OS (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.1-1.94; p=0.0085) and LFS (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.02-1.85; p=0.0387). High risk cytogenetics and older age contributed significantly to inferior outcomes. In summary, this EBMT registry study of HCT for sAML after MDS/MPN is the largest cohort reported. Myeloablative conditioning regimens were associated with a lower relapse risk and superior survival. Given that NRM after HCT has declined in the current era, these data indicate that the outcome of HCT for sAML may be improved by careful patient selection for MAC regimens. Survival may be further enhanced by effective pre-HCT disease control (also associated with decreased NRM) and post-HCT pre-emptive therapy to decrease RI. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Savani: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Ciceri: GSK: Other: B-thalassemia gene therapy was developed by Fondazione Telethon and Ospedale San Raffaele and has been inlicenced by GSK that provides funding for the clinical trial, Research Funding. Schmid: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MoilMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mohty: Sanofi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Alternative Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease in Europe

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111129 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4645-4645 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Barbara Cappelli ◽

Graziana Maria Scigliuolo ◽

Fernanda Volt ◽

Selim Corbacioglu ◽

Josu de la Fuente ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Graft Failure ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Alternative Donor

Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from an HLA identical sibling is a well-established curative therapy for sickle cell disease (SCD). HSCT from an unrelated donor is a treatment option, but the likelihood of finding a donor varies according to ethnicity and results are still limited. HLA haploidentical relatives can be alternatively used but, to date, only small series of patients have been described. We report outcomes of patients (pts) transplanted with related haploidentical (Haplo) or unrelated (UD) donors grafts and reported to EBMT/EUROCORD databases. Sixty four pts transplanted in 22 EBMT centers between 1991 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Pts were described according to the donor type: haploidentical (n=40) and unrelated (n=24) [adult UD n=19; cord blood (CB) n=5]. The objective of the study was to describe alternative donor transplants for SCD in Europe without performing comparison analyses due to the size and heterogeneity of the groups. Primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS). Median follow-up (FU) was 28 months (range: 1.6-156) [29.5 months (range: 2.1 - 133.5) for Haplo and 24.6 (range: 1.6 - 156) for UD]. Median age at HSCT was 14.2 years (range: 3-31.7) in Haplo and 11.8 (range: 2.1-42.8) in UD, with a predominance of children (<16 years) in both groups (23/40 and 19/24, respectively). Before HSCT, 68% of overall pts were treated with hydroxyurea and 62% received more than 20 red blood cell (RBC) units. RBC alloimmunization occurred in 14% of transfused pts. In both groups, vaso-occlusive crisis and cerebral vasculopathy were the most frequent SCD complications and the main indications for HSCT. Other complications were acute chest syndrome (44%), liver disease (31%) and infection (23%). In Haplo, median year of transplant was 2014 (range: 1991-2017) and in UD 2011 (range: 2004-2015). In Haplo, two major protocols were used: (1) post -transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) with G-CSF primed bone marrow (BM) and a fludarabine+ cyclophosphamide+thiotepa+2Gy TBI conditioning regimen [16 pts and 2 centers performing most (n=13) of the transplants]; (2) a protocol (performed in 2 centers) consisting in the use of G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) with ex-vivo B and T cell depletion (BT depleted) (15 pts) and a fludarabine+thiotepa+ treosulfan conditioning regimen (14/15 pts). Haplo donors were most frequently the parents [mother (50%), father (29%), brother (14%) and cousin (7%)]. ATG was used in 95% of transplants and the most frequent combination for graft versus host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis was mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)+sirolimus in PTCY and MMF+ cyclosporine A (CSA) in BT depleted. In UD, graft source distribution was 14 BM, 5 PBSC and 5 CB. Conditioning regimens were mainly myeloablative (83%) with fludarabine+thiotepa+ treosulfan in 54% of HSCT. ATG was used in 87% and campath in 9% of transplants; GvHD prophylaxis was CSA and methotrexate in 50%. Neutrophil engraftment at 60 days was 95±4% in Haplo and 84±8% in adult UD, after a median engraftment time of 18 and 22 days, respectively. In Haplo, 7 pts experienced graft failure (3 primary and 4 late), of those 3 had a second allogeneic transplant and were alive at last FU, at 16, 16 and 63 months respectively; 1 patient died after rescue with autologous transplant and 3 were alive after autologous reconstitution. In adult UD, 3 pts had a primary and 1 a late graft failure, none of them had a second transplant and were all alive at last FU, at 2, 13, 28, 118 months respectively. Grade II-IV acute GvHD at 100 days was 25±7% in Haplo and 21±9% in adult UD; acute GvHD grade III-IV was observed in 3 pts in Haplo (none in BT depleted) and 2 pts in adult UD. Chronic GvHD was observed in 10 pts in Haplo (5 extensive, 3 of these in PTCY) and 3 pts in adult UD (2 extensive). OS at 3 years was 88±4%; being 89±5% in Haplo (88±8% for PTCY, 92±8% for BT depleted) and 94±5% in adult UD. 3-year event free survival was 58±7%; in detail, 60±9% in Haplo (56±12% for PTCY, 68±13% for BT depleted) and 60±12% in adult UD. Overall, 8 pts died (5 Haplo and 3 UD) due to infections or GVHD. Among the 5 pts receiving CB transplant 3 are alive (1 of which after graft failure and a second allogeneic transplant). Conclusion: This preliminary analysis shows that, despite an acceptable OS, rejection and chronic GvHD are still of concern; therefore alternative donor transplants for SCD should be performed in experienced centers with prospective clinical trials. Disclosures Pondarré: Blue Bird Bio: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Addmedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zecca:Chimerix: Honoraria. Locatelli:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Honoraria; Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy. Bader:Medac: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Riemser: Research Funding; Neovii: Research Funding; Cellgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bernaudin:AddMedica: Honoraria; Pierre fabre: Research Funding; BlueBirdBio: Consultancy; Cordons de Vie: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Development and Validation of a Model to Predict Response to Romiplostim in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2801.2801 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2801-2801 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Ghulam J. Mufti ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Platelet Transfusion ◽

Platelet Response ◽

Likelihood Ratios ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Platelet Counts ◽

The Past ◽

Transfusion Requirements

Abstract Abstract 2801 Background: Recommendations for use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in anemic patients with MDS are based on baseline endogenous erythropoietin levels and red blood cell transfusion requirements, factors which predict the likelihood of a response to ESA treatment. These recommendations for ESA use have been incorporated into quality-of-care treatment guidelines for MDS. We examined whether baseline endogenous thrombopoietin (TPO) levels and platelet transfusion requirements likewise predict response of thrombocytopenic MDS patients to treatment with romiplostim, a TPO receptor agonist. Patients and Methods: In a placebo(PBO)-controlled trial of romiplostim (randomized 2:1) in 250 thrombocytopenic [median (Q1, Q3) baseline platelet count 19.3 (12.5, 30.3) × 109/L] IPSS low/int-1 MDS patients, study drug was discontinued early due to data monitoring committee concerns that the potential small benefit seen in the reduction of bleeding did not outweigh the potential risk for disease progression to AML and that the transient increases in blast cell counts may put patients at risk for diagnosis of and treatment for AML. Hematologic improvement of platelets (HI-P, per IWG 2006) is defined as 8 consecutive weeks of an absolute platelet increase of 30×109/L (for patients with baseline platelet counts >20×109/L) or an increase from <20×109/L to >20×109/L and by at least 100% (for patients with baseline platelet counts <20×109/L). In this trial of romiplostim in MDS, HI-P rates were higher with romiplostim than PBO (36.5% vs. 3.6%, odds ratio 15.6, p<0.001) as were median platelet counts from Week 4 on (p<0.001). Data from this trial were used to examine the relationship between baseline TPO levels and platelet transfusion needs and outcomes. TPO levels (in pg/mL) were assessed by ELISA at baseline, weeks 14, 28, 42, and at the end of treatment. In this study, platelet response is defined as meeting the same criteria as HI-P, but for 1 week as opposed to for 8 consecutive weeks. As with the ESA model (Hellstrom-Lindberg BJH 1997), a TPO model was developed from log-likelihood ratios and logistic coefficients, with scaling of the log-likelihood ratios to obtain predictive scores. The TPO model was then validated using data from a previous phase 1/2 study of romiplostim in lower-risk thrombocytopenic MDS patients (Sekeres Cancer 2010, Kantarjian J Clin Onc 2009). Variables analyzed in formulating the model included baseline platelet count, number of platelet units transfused in the past year, and baseline endogenous TPO levels. Results: For romiplostim-treated patients (N = 167), the median age was 71 years, the most common WHO subgroups were RCMD (68.3%), RAEB-1 (14.4%), and MDS-U (9.6%), and IPSS scores were 0 (24.0%), 0.5 (51.5%), 1 (20.4%), 1.5 (0.6%), and missing (3.6%). Median (Q1, Q3) baseline TPO levels were 212 (84, 2290) pg/mL. Among romiplostim-treated patients, patients with an HI-P (vs. those not having an HI-P) had lower median baseline TPO levels (172 vs. 236 pg/mL, p = 0.3589) and lower mean baseline TPO levels (854 vs. 1,210, p = 0.0497), and were less likely to have had ≥6 platelet units transfused in the past year (p = 0.0027). For those with a platelet response during ≥50% of study weeks, median baseline TPO levels were lower (138 vs. 1,034 pg/mL, p = 0.0215) as were mean baseline TPO levels (695 vs. 1,390, p = 0.001) and the likelihood of having had ≥6 platelet units transfused in the past year (p = 0.0037). A model for predicting response to romiplostim (i.e., platelet response for ≥50% of weeks) in patients with lower-risk MDS was developed (Figure, top panel). Of note, history of prior platelet transfusion (<6 vs. ≥6 units in the past year) was a better predictor of platelet response than baseline platelet counts. The model was then validated in a second independent romiplostim monotherapy study in MDS, showing a similar pattern of response rates associated with baseline TPO levels and the presence of past platelet transfusions (Figure, bottom panel). Conclusions: For thrombocytopenic patients with lower-risk MDS, lower baseline TPO levels (<500 pg/mL) and limited platelet transfusion history (<6 units in the past year) predict a greater likelihood that a patient will have a platelet response when treated with romiplostim. Disclosures: Sekeres: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: The use of romiplostim in MDS was examined in this abstract. Giagounidis:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Kantarjian:Amgen: Research Funding. Mufti:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fenaux:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Jia:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yang:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Platzbecker:Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Reduced-Intensity Conditioning (RIC) Regimens for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (alloHCT) in Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (NHL)-a Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-121849 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 319-319

Author(s):

Nilanjan Ghosh ◽

Sairah Ahmed ◽

Carlos Litovich ◽

Kwang Woo Ahn ◽

Manoj Khanal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Conditioning Regimens ◽

The Impact ◽

Reduced Intensity

Introduction: Reduced-intensity and non-myeloablative (RIC/NMA) conditioning regimens are frequently used in alloHCT for NHL, because they are associated with decreased non-relapse mortality (NRM) risk in comparison with myeloablative conditioning regimens and allow older patients and patients with comorbidities to receive alloHCT. However, the optimal RIC/NMA regimen in allo-HCT for NHL is not known. Using the CIBMTR database we compared the transplant outcomes between the commonly used RIC/NMA regimens in NHL. Methods: 1823 adult (≥18 years) NHL patients in CIBMTR registry undergoing alloHCT using matched related or unrelated donors, between 2008-2016 were included. Analysis was limited to patients receiving four commonly used RIC/NMA regimens: fludarabine/ i.v. busulfan (6.4mg/kg) (Flu/Bu), fludarabine/melphalan (140mg/m^2) (Flu/Mel 140), fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (Fly/Cy) and Flu/Cy with 2Gy Total Body Irradiation (Flu/Cy/TBI). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was limited to calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens. Patients who received post transplantation cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included cumulative incidence of NRM, relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) and cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD. Probabilities of OS and PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Multivariable regression analysis was performed for GVHD, relapse/progression, NRM, PFS, and OS. Covariates with a p<0.01 were considered significant. Results: The study cohort was divided into 4 groups; Flu/Bu (n=458), Flu/Cy/TBI (n=89), Flu/Mel 140 (n=885) and Flu/Cy (n=391). The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The 4 cohorts were comparable with respect to median patient age, gender, donor type, remission status at alloHCT, and use of prior auto HCT. There was no interaction between NHL histological subtype and type of conditioning regimen. Results of multivariate analysis are shown in Table 2. The Flu/Mel 140 regimen was associated with a higher NRM (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.37-2.31; p<0.001) when compared to Flu/Bu. Although the risk of relapse with Flu/Mel 140 was lower when compared to Flu/Bu (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.94); p=0.007), this did not result in an improvement in PFS. Moreover, the Flu/Mel 140 cohort had an inferior OS (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.13-1.59; p<0.001) when compared to Flu/Bu. There was no significant difference in terms of OS, PFS, relapse and NRM between Flu/Bu, Flu/Cy and Flu/Cy/TBI. There was no difference in risk of grade 3-4 acute GVHD across the four cohorts and compared to Flu/Cy/TBI, Flu/Mel 140 had a higher risk of chronic GVHD (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.15-1.65; p<0.001). Four year adjusted PFS was 38% for Flu/Bu, 51% for Flu/Cy/TBI, 39% for Flu/Mel 140 and 35% for Flu/Cy (p=0.07). Four year adjusted OS was 58% for Flu/Bu, 67% for Flu/Cy/TBI, 49% for Flu/Mel 140 and 63% for Flu/Cy (p<0.001). Disease relapse was the most common cause of death across all 4 cohorts. Conclusion: This is the largest analysis comparing the impact of various RIC/NMA conditioning regimens on the outcomes of NHL patients undergoing alloHCT. We report that the choice of RIC/NMA conditioning regimen significantly impacted OS. The most commonly used conditioning regimen, Flu/Mel 140 was associated with a higher NRM and an inferior OS. The Flu/Bu, Flu/Cy, and Flu/CY/TBI conditioning regimens appear to provide comparable OS. Disclosures Ghosh: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; SGN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kharfan-Dabaja:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Sureda:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Hamadani:Merck: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Otsuka: Research Funding; Medimmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text