Myeloablative Versus Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Patients with Prior Myelodysplastic Syndrome/ Myeloproliferative Disorders: An ALWP of EBMT Study

Abstract Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) includes a heterogeneous group of diseases evolved from myelodysplasia, myeloproliferative disorders (MDS/ MPN), bone marrow failure syndrome or after exposure to leukemogenic agents such as chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy for malignant hematological (other malignant hematological diseases) or solid tumors. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potentially curative therapy but relapse is a frequent cause of failure after HCT occurring in more than 50% of patients. No systematic large analysis of HCT for sAML has evaluated risk factors and outcome based on a prior diagnosis of MDS or MPN. Therefore, the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) performed a multicenter retrospective registry study on patients undergoing HCT for sAML following MDS/MPN comparing myeloablative (MAC) to reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). ALWP-EBMT supplemental data forms were used to establish the occurrence of any prior hematological disorder or non-hematological malignancy as well as details of cytogenetic data and therapy. We studied 811 patients with a previous diagnosis of MDS/ MPD and available cytogenetic data who had received HCT for sAML from an HLA-identical sibling (MRD, n=344 [42.4%]) or unrelated donor transplant (URD- 9/10 or 10/10) during 2000-16. Median time from diagnosis (sAML) to transplant was 137 days (IQR 94-204). Median age at HCT was 59.57 years (IQR 52-65). sAML with adverse cytogenetics accounted for 269 (33.2%) patients. At the time of HCT, 401 (49.5%) patients were in CR1 and 367 (45.3%) had active disease. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 32 months (IQR, 11-62). Regimen intensity was assessed by EBMT criteria. MAC regimens were used in 326 (40.2%) patients while 485 (59.8%) received RIC. Older patients were more likely to receive RIC than MAC regimens (p<0.001). Most patients received peripheral blood stem cell grafts (n=731 [90.3%]; MAC 85.6% vs RIC 93.4%, p<0.001). A total of 534 (67.9%) patients were cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositive pre-HCT. There were no significant differences in disease characteristics (e.g. disease status at transplant, cytogenetic risk category), donor source, year of transplant or CMV serology status between MAC and RIC cohorts. All patients received a calcineurin inhibitor-based combination as prophylaxis against graft versus host disease (GVHD) and 516 (63%) received in vivo T-cell depletion (rATG 474 (58%). A total of 667 (95.2%) patients engrafted (MAC 94.5% vs. RIC 95.6%; p=0.596). Acute GVHD (grade II-IV) within 100 days of HCT occurred in 24% (95% CI, 21-27; MAC vs. RIC, p=0.126) and 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 33% (95% CI 30-37; MAC vs. RIC, p=0.150). Three-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 41% (95% CI, 38-45; MAC 37% [31-42] vs. RIC 45% [40-49], p=0.029) and 25% (95% CI, 22-28%, MAC 25% [20-30] vs. RIC 25% [21-29], p=0.959), respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS) at 3 years were 40% (95% CI, 37-44; MAC 44% [38-50] vs. RIC 38% [33-43], p=0.041) and 34% (95% CI, 31-38; MAC 38% [33-45] vs. RIC 31% [27-36], p=0.032), respectively (Figure 1). In multivariate analysis by Cox Regression, a higher RI was seen after RIC regimens (HR 1.72 [1.16-2.55]; p=0.0063). Patients receiving RIC regimens had a higher risk of chronic GVHD (HR 1.37 [1.02-1.84], p=0.0389). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was equivalent in MAC and RIC groups.MAC regimens were associated with superior OS (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.1-1.94; p=0.0085) and LFS (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.02-1.85; p=0.0387). High risk cytogenetics and older age contributed significantly to inferior outcomes. In summary, this EBMT registry study of HCT for sAML after MDS/MPN is the largest cohort reported. Myeloablative conditioning regimens were associated with a lower relapse risk and superior survival. Given that NRM after HCT has declined in the current era, these data indicate that the outcome of HCT for sAML may be improved by careful patient selection for MAC regimens. Survival may be further enhanced by effective pre-HCT disease control (also associated with decreased NRM) and post-HCT pre-emptive therapy to decrease RI. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Savani: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Ciceri: GSK: Other: B-thalassemia gene therapy was developed by Fondazione Telethon and Ospedale San Raffaele and has been inlicenced by GSK that provides funding for the clinical trial, Research Funding. Schmid: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MoilMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mohty: Sanofi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Poor Outcomes of HLA-Mismatched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and High Ferritin Levels after a Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimen in Patients with Advanced Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130338 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5742-5742

Author(s):

Han Bi Lee ◽

Jae-Ho Yoon ◽

Gi June Min ◽

Sung-Soo Park ◽

Silvia Park ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Hematopoietic Cell ◽

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Reduced Intensity

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) preconditioning intensity, donor choice, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for advanced myelofibrosis (MF) have not been fully elucidated. Thirty-five patients with advanced MF were treated with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HCT. We searched for matched sibling (n=16) followed by matched (n=10) or mismatched (n=5) unrelated and familial mismatched donors (n=4). Preconditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine (total 150 mg/m2) and busulfan (total 6.4 mg/kg) with total body irradiation≤ 400cGy. All showed engraftments, but four (11.4%) showed either leukemic relapse (n=3) or delayed graft failure (n=1). Two-year overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 60.0% and 29.9%, respectively. Acute GVHD was observed in 19 patients, and grade III-IV acute GVHD was higher with HLA-mismatch (70% vs. 20%, p=0.008). Significant hepatic GVHD was observed in nine patients (5 acute, 4 chronic), and six of them died. Multivariate analysis revealed inferior OS with HLA-mismatch (HR=6.40, 95%CI 1.6-25.7, p=0.009) and in patients with high ferritin level at post-HCT D+21 (HR=7.22, 95%CI 1.9-27.5, p=0.004), which were related to hepatic GVHD and high NRM. RIC allo-HCT can be a valid choice for advanced MF. However, HLA-mismatch and high post-HCT ferritin levels related to significant hepatic GVHD should be regarded as poor-risk parameters. Disclosures Kim: Handok: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Hanmi: Consultancy, Honoraria; AGP: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SL VaxiGen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Honoraria; BL & H: Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria; Yuhan: Honoraria; Sanofi-Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lee:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Achillion: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

No Influence of Peripheral Blood CD34+ and CD3+ Graft Cell Counts on Outcomes after Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112453 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4577-4577

Author(s):

Alice Garnier ◽

Thierry Guillaume ◽

Pierre Peterlin ◽

Amandine Le Bourgeois ◽

Alix Duquesne ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cell Content ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Introduction Although associated with a higher incidence of acute GVHD, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are increasingly used for haploidentical allogeneic transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY). Data reporting whether or not the composition of the PBSC graft impacts outcomes of patients receiving PTCY are still scarce. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included all adults allografted in our department who received a PBSC allotransplant after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) with PTCY. Grafts originated from a matched or haploidentical donor and recipients received a Baltimore-based or a Clo-Baltimore (where fludarabine is replaced by clofarabine)-based RIC regimen. All patients received cyclosporine + mycophenolate mofetyl and PTCY as GVHD prophylaxis. CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell contents were considered to study their potential impact on the following outcomes: OS, DFS, GRFS, acute grade 2-4 and 3-4 GHVD and chronic GVHD, early immune reconstitution (IR, lymphocytes and monocytes counts at days+30 and +100 post-transplant, CD4+, CD8+, NK and B cells at day+100 post-transplant). Results Between November 2013 and May 2017, 77 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 48 males and 29 females with a median age of 58 years (range: 22-71) and a median follow-up for alive patients of 29.2 months (range: 8.4-53.2). Initial diagnoses were mainly acute myeloid (n=21) or lymphoid (n=6) leukemia, lymphoma (n=13), myelodysplastic syndrome (SMD, n=12), myelofibrosis (n=9). Thirty-eight patients were in complete remission at time of transplant (CR1 n=23; CR2 n=12, CR3 n=3) while 22 had active disease and 17 were in partial remission. Donors were sibling in 6 cases, matched unrelated (MUD) in 14, 9/10 mismatched unrelated in 1 and haploidentical in 56. Forty patients received a Baltimore RIC regimen and 37 a Clo-Baltimore RIC regimen. Analyses were performed in July 2018. Median infused CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell counts, based on recipients' weight, were 7.8 106/Kg (range: 1.45-14.24) and 22.23 107/kg (range: 1.95-66.75), respectively. All patients but three engrafted, the latter being 1 patient transplanted with a haplodonor, 1 with a MUD and 1 who died of infection during induction. Two-year OS, DFS and GRFS were 62.6% (52-74), 51.5% (40-63) and 36.6% (27-49), respectively. The incidences of grade 2-4 and 3-4 acute GVHD were 46.7% and 14.2%, respectively, while the incidence of moderate + severe chronic GVHD was 14%. Relapse occurred in 26 patients and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 15.5%. Baltimore vs Clo-Baltimore patients shared similar median infused CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell counts and outcomes. The same was observed for patients allografted with a haplodonor or not, except for the incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD which was significantly higher for the haplo group at 57.1% vs 19% (p=0.006). This difference was first attributed to the higher CD3+ cell content infused in this group (median: 24.05 vs 18.85 107/kg, p=0.04). However, using the median of CD3+ cell graft content as threshold, the incidence of acute grade 2-4 GVHD was not different between low vs high groups when considering haplo patients. This suggests that it was rather the type of donor that did influence acute GVHD occurrence and that PTCY is of particular interest for GVHD prophylaxis when using matched donors. Partitioning the patients according to the median level of CD34+ cells, there was no difference in terms of 2-year OS (57.1% vs 60.7%, p=0.53), DFS (44.5% vs 55.6%, p=0.47) , GRFS (31.7% vs 44.3%, p=0.32), acute grade 2-4 (59% vs 39%, p=0.13) and 3-4 GVHD (17% vs 6.4%, p=0.29), and moderate + severe chronic GVHD (19.5% vs 20%, p=0.57). Similarly, partitioning patients according to median graft CD3+ cell content, outcomes were similar for 2-year OS (64.8% vs 55.8%,p=0.45), DFS (46.3% vs 55.8%, p=0.62), GRFS (36.3% vs 40.4%, p=0.63), acute grade 2-4 (44.7% vs 56.4%, p=0.42) and 3-4 GVHD (10.5% vs 15.3%, p=0.76), and moderate + severe chronic GVHD (14% vs 17.6%, p=0.91). Finally, early IR was not influenced by CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell contents. Conclusion: PBSC CD34+ and CD3+ graft cell contents have no impact on survivals, GVHD incidence nor early IR after a RIC allotransplant using PTCY as GVHD prophylaxis. As a consequence, there is no need to manipulate the graft nor cap the stem cells dose to be infused. These data have to be confirmed prospectively on a larger cohort of patients. Disclosures Gastinne: Millennium/Takeda: Honoraria. Moreau:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Identification of Functionally Primitive and Immunophenotypically Distinct Subpopulations in Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia By Mass Cytometry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4278.4278 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4278-4278

Author(s):

Shovik Bandyopadhyay ◽

Liyang Yu ◽

Daniel A.C. Fisher ◽

Olga Malkova ◽

Stephen T. Oh

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Types ◽

Cell Populations ◽

Specific Cell ◽

Mass Cytometry ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction: Mass cytometry is a powerful tool for analyzing cellular networks, with the ability to generate massive data sets encompassing > 40 parameters measured simultaneously at the single cell level. Various groups have created a variety of platforms to analyze this high dimensional data in unique and efficient ways. These tools have a range of applications: from using phenotypic similarities to cluster cells, stratifying unique signaling subpopulations based on observed stimulation responses, mapping the developmental trajectory of cell types, among many others. We have previously utilized mass cytometry to characterize NFkB hyperactivation in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Here we applied mass cytometric analysis to a cohort of patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) following a history of chronic MPN. The objective of this work was to identify populations of functionally primitive leukemic cells, relying not only on traditional immunophenotypic designations (which can vary considerably in sAML), but also by inferring functional status based on the presence or absence of cytokine hypersensitivity and constitutively active signaling in specific cell populations. Results: Dimensionality reduction and clustering analysis by viSNE and SPADE identified multiple cell subsets outside the hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) compartment that exhibited overt thrombopoietin (TPO) sensitivity, while healthy controls had highly localized responses largely restricted to the HSPC compartment. Using Phenograph, ten sAML metaclusters were identified containing cells from six sAML patients analyzed. One of these metaclusters represented a distinct subpopulation of CD61+ CD34- CD38- CD45lo cells with variable CD90 and CD11b expression. This subpopulation of CD61+ cells was not identified by manual gating, and exhibited significantly greater STAT3/STAT5 phosphorylation in response to TPO than did lineage-negative CD34+ CD38- cells in five out of six (83%) AML patients examined. In addition, substantially elevated basal STAT3 phosphorylation in this population was hypersensitive to TPO and largely resistant to ex vivo ruxolitnib. The classify function of Phenograph was utilized to determine whether the cytokine hypersensitivity observed in the viSNE and SPADE analysis could be entirely accounted for by the aforementioned CD61+ CD34- CD38- CD45lo population. The signaling responses highly predictive of specific cell types were identified, which were used to assess the functional status of sAML cells compared to healthy Lin- CD34+ CD38- cells. By this approach, sAML cells were found to exhibit significant incongruity between surface cell type designation and functional designation. Furthermore, functionally primitive cells displayed a spectrum of myeloid surface markers, suggesting that restricting analysis to a subset of strictly surface-defined cells would potentially obscure populations of interest. Conclusions: Our analysis revealed a distinct, previously undescribed population of CD61+ CD34- CD38- CD45lo cells in sAML. While the biological relevance of this population requires validation by functional assays, this result demonstrates that immunophenotypic changes in traditional surface-marker-defined populations may conceal important cell populations. These cells, and other functionally primitive but mature-designated cells could be relevant to studying sAML disease pathogenesis, progression, and/or response to therapy. This study further demonstrates the potential for mass cytometry to elucidate rare leukemic subpopulations in highly heterogeneous tumors. Disclosures Oh: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Reduced Intensity Vs. Non-Myeloablative Conditioning Regimens for Haploidentical Transplantation in Complete Remission Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Study from the ALWP of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-140657 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 9-9

Author(s):

Raynier Devillier ◽

Jacques-Emmanuel Galimard ◽

Myriam Labopin ◽

Didier Blaise ◽

Emanuele Angelucci ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Myeloablative Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Conditioning Regimens ◽

Conditioning Intensity ◽

Reduced Intensity

Background: In the context of a haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) platform with post transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, the optimal conditioning regimen remains unknown. A non-myeloablative conditioning (NMAC) regimen (cyclophosphamide + fludarabine + 2Gy TBI [CyFluTBI]) was initially reported by the Johns Hopkins group as a safe approach in this setting, notably to treat patients of advanced age and/or with comorbid conditions. However, relapse incidence after NMAC Haplo-SCT remains high in AML where it can reach 45%. Alternatively, a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen containing an antileukemic drug combination like thiotepa and reduced-dose busulfan in addition to fludarabine (TBF) may decrease AML relapse. However, this anticipated benefit may be counterbalanced by a higher incidence of toxicity, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and non-relapse mortality (NRM). To date, no study comparing TBF vs. CyFluTBI has been published in complete remission (CR) AML. We performed this retrospective comparison on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 398 patients from the EBMT registry database with the following inclusion criteria: 1) adult patient in CR1 or CR2 AML; 2) T-replete Haplo-SCT with PT-Cy; 3) no in vivo depletion using antithymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab; and 4) receiving either TBF RIC (equivalent of 2-day iv busulfan dose) or CyFluTBI NMAC regimen. We compared separately TBF vs. CyFluTBI in patients younger (n=170, 82 TBF vs. 88 CyFluTBI) and older (n=228, 141 TBF vs. 87 CyFluTBI) than 60 years. Results: In patients younger than 60 years, the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower in the TBF group compared with the CyFluTBI group (TBF vs. CyFluTBI: 14% vs. 43%, p<0.01). No significant increase in 2-year NRM was observed (TBF vs. CyFluTBI: 22% vs. 16%, p=0.15). This led to a significantly higher 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) probability in the TBF group (64% vs. 41%, p=0.03). After adjustment in multivariate analysis, CyFluTBI was associated with a higher risk of relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 3.4, 95%CI [1.4-6.9], p<0.01), lower LFS (HR 1.8, 95%CI 1.1-3.0, p=0.03) and lower overall survival (OS) (HR 1.8, 95%CI 1.1-3.1, p=0.02), without significant impact of conditioning regimen on incidence of GVHD and NRM. In patients older than 60 years, univariate analysis did not show any significant difference in outcome according to the type of conditioning regimen (2-year NRM: TBF vs. CyFluTBI: 33% vs. 25%, p=0.23; 2-year CIR: TBF vs. CyFluTBI: 23% vs. 28%, p=0.20; 2-year LFS: TBF vs. CyFluTBI: 44% vs. 47%, p=0.96). Multivariate analysis showed a significant reduction in the risk of NRM after CyFluTBI (HR 0.5, 95%CI [0.2-0.9], p=0.04), while a non-significant increase in the risk of relapse was observed (HR 1.9, 95%CI [0.8-4.2], p=0.13). Finally, there was no significant difference in LFS (HR 0.9, 95%CI [0.5-1.5], p=0.67) and OS (HR 0.9, 95%CI [0.5-1.5], p=0.67). Conclusion: Our study suggests that in CR AML patients aged younger than 60 years, the use of TBF RIC provides better outcomes than NMAC CyFluTBI due to lower incidence of relapse, without significant increase in the risk of NRM. Conversely, it seems that older patients do not benefit from such conditioning intensification, due to a significantly higher risk of NRM after TBF RIC. Thus, in CR AML patients who will not receive a truly myeloablative regimen prior to PT-Cy Haplo-SCT, age could be used for determining the conditioning intensity from the wide variety of reduced toxicity conditioning regimens. Beyond the patient age, further prospective trials should assess patient-based parameters that may be useful for a fine tuning of conditioning intensity in a more individualized approach. Disclosures Labopin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Blaise:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Bug:Sanofi: Other: Travel; Neovii: Other: Travel; Jazz: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel; Hexal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eurocept: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel. Mohty:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Real World Outcomes of Liposomal Daunorubicin and Cytarabine Versus 7+3 in Patients with Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142595 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5-6

Author(s):

Ellen Madarang ◽

Jillian Lykon ◽

Nina Nguyen ◽

Justin M. Watts ◽

Terrence J Bradley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Liposomal Daunorubicin ◽

Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Study Population ◽

Patient Groups ◽

Acute Myeloid ◽

Count Recovery

Introduction: Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351) was approved based on data which showed improved overall survival (9.56 v 5.95 months; p = .003) and remission rates (47.7% v 33.3%; p = .016) compared to conventional cytarabine and daunorubicin (7+3) chemotherapy in older patients with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Patients receiving CPX-351 had prolonged time to neutrophil and platelet count recovery compared to 7+3, which was not associated with adverse outcomes (Lancet et al, JCO 2018). Based on these data, our center adopted CPX-351 as a first-line agent in this patient population. Considering the significant cost differences and delays in count recovery, we conducted a comparison of outcomes in patients who received CPX-351 versus 7+3 at our center. Methods: The objective of this study was to compare efficacy and safety of CPX-351 versus 7+3 in patients with sAML. Primary outcome was response rate as defined by CR or CRi. Secondary outcomes included duration of neutropenia, incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs), and number of patients proceeding to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Patients with sAML receiving induction with 7+3 (daunorubicin dosed at 60 or 90 mg/m2 per treating physician's discretion) or CPX-351 from July 2014 to April 2020 were reviewed. Secondary AML was defined as: AML with a history of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), AML with myelodysplasia-related changes, or therapy-related AML. Patients with prior myeloproliferative neoplasms, myelofibrosis, or FLT3 mutations were excluded. Patient characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics (TABLE 1) including mean for continuous measures and proportions and frequencies for categorical measures. The association between continuous variables and patient groups were assessed using ANOVA or Student's t-test. The associations between categorical variables and patient groups were evaluated using Chi-square test. Results: Over the study period, 65 patients with sAML received induction therapy with either CPX-351 (n = 31) or 7+3 (n = 34). Of these, 61 patients had an evaluable bone marrow biopsy at count recovery. The data is summarized in Table 2. The response rates (CR or CRi) were no different (36% 7+3 vs 36% CPX-351, p = 0.958) among the study population. Longer duration of neutropenia was observed with CPX-351 (33 days 7+3 vs 47 days CPX-351, p = 0.026). More patients in the 7+3 arm proceeded to allogeneic HCT; however, this was not statistically significant (59% 7+3 vs 39% CPX-351, p = 0.105). In an efficacy subgroup analysis of patients with TP53 mutation, there was no difference in response rates (33% 7+3 vs 11% CPX-351, p = 0.224). There was no difference in IFI between the groups (38% 7+3 vs 42% CPX-351, p = 0.761). Upon further analysis of IFI characteristics, there was no difference in choice of mold-active vs non mold-active prophylaxis (ppx) and the incidence of IFIs (40% mold ppx vs 39% non-mold ppx, p = 0.91). Patients with baseline neutropenia prior to induction did not have increased risk of IFIs (65% 7+3 vs 74% CPX-351, p = 0.626). Additionally, there were no between group differences in incidence of IFIs in patients who were neutropenic prior to induction. Conclusions: In the evaluable dataset of patients receiving 7+3 or CPX-351, there was no difference in CR/CRi rate between the two subgroups. There was a longer duration of neutropenia in the CPX-351 group without increased incidence of IFI. However, we report a higher incidence of IFI compared to the study population in Lancet et al (18% Lancet vs 40% Miami) despite appropriate anti-fungal prophylaxis, which may be due to patient selection on the clinical trial, demographic differences (e.g., age, ethnicity), or locoregional environmental factors. In our population, a greater percentage of patients who received 7+3 proceeded to allogeneic HCT. While this study was not powered to detect a significant difference between the two regimens and these findings require validation in larger cohorts, they do not support superior outcomes in patients who receive CPX-351. Data on differences in hospital costs will also be presented. Future directions include a larger multi-center real-world analysis to evaluate patient outcomes, safety, and the financial implications of these two regimens. Disclosures Watts: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rafael Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Influence of Donor Type (sibling vs matched-unrelated donor vs haplo-identical donor vs cord blood) on Outcomes after Clofarabine-Based Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allograft for Myeloid Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112369 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3451-3451

Author(s):

Louise Bouard ◽

Thierry Guillaume ◽

Pierre Peterlin ◽

Alice Garnier ◽

Amandine Le Bourgeois ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Cord Blood ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Donor Type ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Background: Recently, we have reported the good results of a clofarabine-based reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) allografts, using either matched (Le Bourgeois, ASH 2017) or haploidentical (haplo) donors (Chevallier, ASH 2017). However, the influence of donor type in this setting is unknown. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all adults (≥18 yo) allografted in our department with a clofarabine-based RIC regimen for a myeloid malignancy. All types of donors were accepted, and patients received allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) or cord blood (CB) transplants. The aim of this study was to assess whether or not the donor type (sibling, matched unrelated (MUD), haplo or CB) impacted outcomes. Results: Between October 2009 and February 2018, 122 patients met the inclusion criteria. Donors were sibling in 36 cases, "MUD" in 55 (including one 9/10 mismatched donor), haplo in 27 and CB in 4. The sibling+MUD patients received a CloB2A1/A2 RIC regimen consisting of clofarabine 30 mg/m²/day 4 to 5 days (Clo), busulfan 3.2 mg/kg/day 2 days (B2) and 2.5mg/kg/day of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin 1 or 2 days (A1 or A2). Haplo and CB recipients were conditioned by a Baltimore-like RIC regimen and a Minneapolis-like regimen, respectively, where fludarabine were replaced by clofarabine. All patients received cyclosporine (CsA) + mycophenolate mofetyl as GVHD prophylaxis, except sibling recipients who were given CsA alone. Haplo recipients received also 2 days of post-transplant cyclophosphamide. All non-CB patients received PBSC as source of graft. The median age of the whole cohort was 61,5 years old (range: 18-73) and the median follow-up 31 months (range: 4,5-106). All patients engrafted except 1 CB patient and 1 haplo recipient who died of infection before engraftment. All CB cases died at 1, 8, 9 and 11,5 months post-transplant, respectively (infection n=1, relapse n=2, chronic GVHD n=1). As a consequence, we thereafter compared outcomes only between the three other donor groups. There were no significant differences between sibling, MUD or haplo recipient groups in terms of gender, median age, type of disease, ELN 2010 classification for AML, status at transplant (complete remission vs active), disease risk index, donor/recipient CMV status or median graft quantity of CD34+ stem cells. The only differences were the partition of ABO compatibility, less frequent in the MUD group (42% vs sibling 69% vs haplo 67%, p=0,02) and a history of previous allograft (haplo n=7, sibling n=0, MUD n=6, p=0,005). Neutrophils (>0,5 Giga/L) and platelets (50 Giga/L) recoveries were significantly delayed in the haplo-group (19 days, vs sibling 15 vs MUD 15, p=0.0003; and 31 days vs 11 vs 12, p<0.0001). Acute grade 2-4 or 3-4 graft versus host disease (GVHD) incidences were similar between the three groups at 50% and 22% for sibling, 34,5% and 14,5% for MUD and 48% and 11% for haplo (p=0,18 for grade 2-4 and p=0,45 for grade 3-4) as well as moderate+severe chronic GVHD incidences (sibling 14%, MUD 16%, haplo 15% p=0,94). Follow-ups were similar at 34.2 (6-74), 33.7 (4.5-106) and 21.4 (7-53) months respectively for sibling, MUD or haplo donors. This was associated with similar 2-year overall survivals (OS) at 64,7% (50-83), 73,9% (62-87) and 60,2% (43-83) respectively (p=0.4) and 2-year disease-free survivals (DFS) at 57,7% (43-76), 70,9% (59-84) and 53,6% (37-77) respectively (p=0.1). Two-year GVHD-relapse free survival (GRFS) was also similar at respectively 37,9% (24-57), 54,3% (41-70) and 38,9% (23-63) (p=0.2) as well as 2-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 14%, 11% and 18,5% (p=0,63). When considering only AML patients, again similar 2-year survivals were observed between the three groups. OS was 71.4% (54-93) for sibling (n=21), 75.1% (62-90) for MUD (n=40) and 66.6% (46-95) for haplo (n=15, p=0.65) and DFS respectively 66,6% (49-90), 70,8% (57-87) and 66,6% (46-95 p=0.47). The same was observed for GRFS at 38% (22-65), 56% (41-75) and 40% (21-74, p=0.14) and NRM at 14%, 7,5% and 7%, p=0.34). In multivariate analysis, donor type remained independent of outcomes in this series. Conclusion: These data confirm that since no difference was observed in terms of outcomes, haplodonors represent a valid alternative for patients receiving a clofarabine-based RIC PBSC allograft for myeloid malignancies who lack a matched sibling donor. Disclosures Gastinne: Millennium/Takeda: Honoraria. Moreau:Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Reduced-Intensity Conditioning (RIC) Regimens for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (alloHCT) in Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (NHL)-a Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-121849 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 319-319

Author(s):

Nilanjan Ghosh ◽

Sairah Ahmed ◽

Carlos Litovich ◽

Kwang Woo Ahn ◽

Manoj Khanal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Conditioning Regimens ◽

The Impact ◽

Reduced Intensity

Introduction: Reduced-intensity and non-myeloablative (RIC/NMA) conditioning regimens are frequently used in alloHCT for NHL, because they are associated with decreased non-relapse mortality (NRM) risk in comparison with myeloablative conditioning regimens and allow older patients and patients with comorbidities to receive alloHCT. However, the optimal RIC/NMA regimen in allo-HCT for NHL is not known. Using the CIBMTR database we compared the transplant outcomes between the commonly used RIC/NMA regimens in NHL. Methods: 1823 adult (≥18 years) NHL patients in CIBMTR registry undergoing alloHCT using matched related or unrelated donors, between 2008-2016 were included. Analysis was limited to patients receiving four commonly used RIC/NMA regimens: fludarabine/ i.v. busulfan (6.4mg/kg) (Flu/Bu), fludarabine/melphalan (140mg/m^2) (Flu/Mel 140), fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (Fly/Cy) and Flu/Cy with 2Gy Total Body Irradiation (Flu/Cy/TBI). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was limited to calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens. Patients who received post transplantation cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included cumulative incidence of NRM, relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) and cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD. Probabilities of OS and PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Multivariable regression analysis was performed for GVHD, relapse/progression, NRM, PFS, and OS. Covariates with a p<0.01 were considered significant. Results: The study cohort was divided into 4 groups; Flu/Bu (n=458), Flu/Cy/TBI (n=89), Flu/Mel 140 (n=885) and Flu/Cy (n=391). The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The 4 cohorts were comparable with respect to median patient age, gender, donor type, remission status at alloHCT, and use of prior auto HCT. There was no interaction between NHL histological subtype and type of conditioning regimen. Results of multivariate analysis are shown in Table 2. The Flu/Mel 140 regimen was associated with a higher NRM (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.37-2.31; p<0.001) when compared to Flu/Bu. Although the risk of relapse with Flu/Mel 140 was lower when compared to Flu/Bu (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.94); p=0.007), this did not result in an improvement in PFS. Moreover, the Flu/Mel 140 cohort had an inferior OS (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.13-1.59; p<0.001) when compared to Flu/Bu. There was no significant difference in terms of OS, PFS, relapse and NRM between Flu/Bu, Flu/Cy and Flu/Cy/TBI. There was no difference in risk of grade 3-4 acute GVHD across the four cohorts and compared to Flu/Cy/TBI, Flu/Mel 140 had a higher risk of chronic GVHD (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.15-1.65; p<0.001). Four year adjusted PFS was 38% for Flu/Bu, 51% for Flu/Cy/TBI, 39% for Flu/Mel 140 and 35% for Flu/Cy (p=0.07). Four year adjusted OS was 58% for Flu/Bu, 67% for Flu/Cy/TBI, 49% for Flu/Mel 140 and 63% for Flu/Cy (p<0.001). Disease relapse was the most common cause of death across all 4 cohorts. Conclusion: This is the largest analysis comparing the impact of various RIC/NMA conditioning regimens on the outcomes of NHL patients undergoing alloHCT. We report that the choice of RIC/NMA conditioning regimen significantly impacted OS. The most commonly used conditioning regimen, Flu/Mel 140 was associated with a higher NRM and an inferior OS. The Flu/Bu, Flu/Cy, and Flu/CY/TBI conditioning regimens appear to provide comparable OS. Disclosures Ghosh: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; SGN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kharfan-Dabaja:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Sureda:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Hamadani:Merck: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Otsuka: Research Funding; Medimmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Effect of Age on Outcomes of Allogeneic Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146334 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3933-3933

Author(s):

Audrey M. Sigmund ◽

Justin Jiang ◽

Qiuhong Zhao ◽

Patrick Elder ◽

Ashley E. Rosko ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Older Patients ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has become an increasingly important consolidation treatment option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and as upfront therapy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Although the median age at diagnosis for both diseases is above 65 years, studies evaluating allo-SCT as treatment option for patients aged 65 years or older are limited. Further, as the population ages, the number of patients above 65 years considered for allo-SCT will continue to rise. Thus, the aim of our current investigation was to analyze outcomes based on age in AML/MDS patients <65 years old and ≥65 years old who received allo-SCT at the Ohio State University. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for all AML/MDS patients who received allo-SCT between January 1984 and December 2018 at our institution. Primary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS was counted from the day of transplantation to relapse or death. OS was defined as survival from the day of allo-SCT until death from any cause, with censoring of patients known to be alive at the time of last follow-up. PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan Meier Curves. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Cumulative incidence rates of aGVHD, cGVHD, relapse, NRM were estimated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks. Results: The cohort consisted of 900 AML/MDS patients, with 150 patients ≥65 years and 750 patients <65 years. The median age at transplant for the <65 years group was 49 years (range: 18-64 years) and 68 years (range: 65-76 years) for the ≥65 years group. Gender, race, Karnofsky score, and comorbidity index were similar between the two groups. A higher proportion of patients received myeloablative (MA) conditioning (65.1%) in the <65 years of age compared to 20% in the ≥65 years of age (p<0.01). A higher proportion of older patients had matched unrelated donors (57.3%), and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens (80%). The median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 176 days (range: 55-4920) for age <65 years and 168 days (range: 34-6079 days) for age ≥65 years. Median follow-up from allo-SCT was 5.9 years (range 0.8-35.9 years) and 3.4 years (range: 1.0-9.6 years) from transplantation among survivors. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were similar among the groups (p=0.35; 0.11). 3 year OS of 42.3% (95% CI: 38.7-45.8%) and PFS of 38.3% (95% CI: 34.8%-41.9%) were observed for age <65 years. The corresponding OS and PFS for age ≥65 years was 46.3% (95% CI: 37.9%-54.3%) and 43.0% (95% CI: 34.7%-51.0%), respectively (Figure 1a & 1b). Cumulative incidences of relapse at 1 year in <65 and ≥65 years were 26.4% and 25.3%, respectively (p=0.43). The cumulative incidence of NRM at 1 year in <65 and ≥65 years was 23.2% and 17.3%, respectively (p=0.12; Figures 1c and d). The incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were similar in the two age groups. The cumulative incidence of aGVHD at day 100 in <65 and ≥65 years was 40.3% (95% CI: 36.4%-44.2%) and 43.0% (95% CI: 34.9%-50.7%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of cGVHD at day 365 in <65 and ≥65 years was 40.8% (95% CI: 36.9%-44.6%) and 41.6% (95% CI: 33.6%-49.4%), respectively. Conclusion: Overall, our study suggests similar outcomes for elderly patients undergoing allo-HCT as compared to their counterparts, which is in line with prior studies. This likely is due to advancements in the transplant field, including the development of RIC and alternative donors, which have allowed greater access to transplant for older adults. Utilization of allo-HCT is feasible and should be considered for AML/MDS patients ≥65 years. Further research is underway to evaluate the important determinants of health status in older patients undergoing allo-HCT and to ultimately help predict NRM (BMT CTN 1704). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bumma: Amgen, Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi: Consultancy. Vasu: Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski: Takeda: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mims: Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Consultancy; Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Daiichi-Saynko: Consultancy. Brammer: Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy. Saad: Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; careDx: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; OrcaBio: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy. de Lima: Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Incidence and Predictors of Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease after Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113130 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3376-3376

Author(s):

Clinton Lewis ◽

Haesook T. Kim ◽

Corey S. Cutler ◽

John Koreth ◽

Sarah Nikiforow ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Platelet Transfusion ◽

Kidney Injury ◽

Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Transfusion Requirements ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Introduction: Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD)/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (SOS) is a serious complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) that is triggered, at least in part, by conditioning regimen-induced sinusoidal endothelial cell injury. VOD is thus commonly, but not exclusively, associated with myeloablative conditioning (MAC). The incidence of VOD in reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) HSCT was ≈2% in a single center series (Carreras et al. BBMT 2011), and risk factors for VOD in RIC HSCT remain poorly defined. Methods: We performed a retrospective review to confirm all cases of VOD among patients undergoing RIC HSCT at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center between January 2007 and June 2017. Diagnosis of VOD was based on modified Seattle or Baltimore criteria and/or liver biopsy or RUQ ultrasound in conjunction with fluid retention/ascites and hepatomegaly/RUQ pain. Diagnosis dates for all VOD cases were confirmed and clinico-laboratory values collected in the 10 days preceding the diagnosis. The same data were collected for a randomly selected control non-VOD RIC cohort, calculated from the median day of VOD onset derived from the cases. Acute kidney injury was defined as an absolute increase in creatine by 0.3 mg/dL or a relative increase of > 50% within a 48-hour period. Increased platelet transfusion requirement was defined as requiring a platelet transfusion on 2 consecutive days in the 7 days prior to VOD diagnosis, excluding transfusions for procedures. Incidence of VOD at D50 was calculated using a competing risk framework. Cox regression was used to identify significant features for predicting VOD. Survival was compared to a concurrent cohort of 76 patients with VOD after MAC HSCT recently published from our center (Roeker et al. BBMT 2018). Results: A total of 1492 patients underwent RIC HSCT, of whom 1070 (67.8%) received sirolimus (Sir) with tacrolimus (Tac) as part of the GVHD prophylaxis, and 1217 (82%) received intravenous busulfan(Bu) 3.2 or 6.4mg/kg with fludarabine(Flu) as conditioning. Twenty-six developed VOD (median day of diagnosis = d+26, range 5-48 days), for a cumulative incidence of 1.6% (95%CI 1.1%-2.4%). The median bilirubin at diagnosis was 1.1 mg/dL(range 0.6-5.2). Only 5 (19.2%) patients had a bilirubin of ≥2.0 mg/dL on the date of VOD diagnosis, although total bilirubin peaked at ≥ 2 mg/dL in 17 of 26 (65.4%). VOD was mild/moderate in 16 and severe in 10 patients. Sixteen had received ursodiol as VOD prophylaxis. Defibrotide was used as treatment in 17 cases. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 54% from VOD onset. VOD was associated with increased risk for NRM (HR 4.02, 95% CI 2.1-7.7, p<0.0001), but not OS (HR 1.53, 95% CI 0.9-2.6, p= 0.11), PFS (HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.9-2.4, p= 0.17) or relapse (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.3-1.5, p= 0.35). Compared to patients who developed VOD after MAC, OS at 2 years after VOD was better in RIC patients (54% vs. 28%, p=0.04). Use of ursodiol was not associated with any reduction in VOD incidence. In the multivariable model, the only significant risk factor for VOD was use of Sir with Tac for GVHD prophylaxis (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.26-12.17). Among RIC Bu/Flu patients who received Tac/Sir based GVHD prophylaxis, 18/877 (2.1%) developed VOD, compared to 1/351 (0.28%) in RIC Bu/Flu patients without Sir, p <0.01. To assess clinico-laboratory predictors of VOD patients in the 10 days prior to VOD diagnosis, we compared the 26 VOD cases to 65 randomly selected control RIC patients. The groups were well matched with regards to baseline characteristics. In the 10 days prior to VOD diagnosis (or D+26 for controls), VOD patients were significantly more likely to develop acute kidney injury, peak creatinine >1, increasing platelet transfusion requirements, and increasing Tac and Sir trough levels (Table 1, Fig 1). Conclusions: The incidence of VOD in this large modern cohort of 1492 RIC HSCT patients was 1.6%, and was associated with the use of Sir with Tac. Onset of VOD in RIC patients was delayed (median D+26 vs. D+14) and 2 yr-OS is superior compared to MAC patients. Only 19% of the RIC VOD cases met the bilirubin threshold for Baltimore and Seattle criteria at diagnosis, suggesting that the rise in bilirubin is a later event in these RIC VOD cases, whereas increasing platelet transfusion requirements, sudden rise in Tac and Sir levels, elevated serum creatinine and acute renal injury appear to be early clinical predictors. Disclosures Nikiforow: Kite Pharma: Consultancy. Antin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Soiffer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ho:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Liposomal Cytarabine/Daunorubicin (CPX-351) in Younger Patients < 60 Years Old with Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113002 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2677-2677 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Amanda Przespolewski ◽

Chetasi Talati ◽

Pankit Vachhani ◽

Srinivasa Reddy Sanikommu ◽

Swapna Thota ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (s-AML) have poor long-term outcomes following standard induction chemotherapy with 7+3. Last year, a liposomal cytarabine and daunorubicin formulation (CPX-351) was FDA approved for upfront treatment of s-AML based on a pivotal phase 3 trial demonstrating improved overall survival in pts aged 60-75 years old (Lancet J et al; JCO 2018). Although CPX-351 treatment is indicated in all adults with s-AML, it is unclear whether CPX-351 is safe and effective in younger pts < 60 years. We sought to address this unanswered question by retrospective review of clinical experience since FDA approval at 4 large academic centers. Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of Alabama Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Levine Cancer Institute to identify pts aged 18-59 years old with untreated s-AML defined as antecedent MDS or CMML, prior cytotoxic therapy, or AML with WHO defined myelodysplasia related changes (AML-MRC) treated with CPX-351 as induction therapy. Demographics, disease-specific variables, as well as overall outcomes were collected in accordance with the institutional review board approved protocol. Responses were defined according to the 2003 International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, treatment response, and adverse events were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Overall survival was estimated utilizing Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis. Results: Twenty-one pts with confirmed s-AML received CPX-351 therapy. Mean age was 54 years (range 42 - 59), 13 were male (62%). The majority (62%, N=13) had AML-MRC, 4 (19%) had treatment-related AML (t-AML) and 4 (19%) had MDS-MRC. Four of 5 pts had received prior hypomethylating therapy. Fourteen pts had a complex karyotype (67%), and 4 patients were found to have a normal karyotype (12%). The most common molecular event was TP53 mutation seen in 9 pts (43%), followed by FLT3-ITD identified in 3 pts (14%). At the time of analysis, response assessments were available for 16 pts. Overall response rate (CR/CRi/PR) was 25% with 1 CR (6.25%, 1/16), 1 CRi (6.25%, 1/16), and 2 PR (13%, 2/16). The remaining pts (12/16, 75%) were non-responders (Table 1). One pt has received an allogenic stem cell transplant. The most common adverse event was infection (81%, 17/21) with 3 clinically significant bleeding events. Thirty-day mortality was 14.3%, with 60-day mortality of 19.1%. Overall survival in all evaluable pts (N=21) was 7.1 months (range 0.5 - 7.4 months) (Figure 1), with mean follow up of 14.8 weeks. Conclusions: This multi-institutional retrospective analysis suggests that CPX-351 results in lower response rates (CR/CRi 12.5%) and shorter overall survival (7.1 mos) than reported in the recently published phase 3 trial data in pts aged 60-75 years old (Table 1). Potential explanations for this discrepancy include short follow up, small sample size, the retrospective design of this study, and the significant proportions of pts with complex karyotype and TP53 mutations. Historically, patients < 65 years old with s-AML have had a reported overall survival of approximately 7 months. Further investigation of this regimen in younger pts with s-AML as compared with 7+3 and other approaches is warranted. Disclosures Thota: Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Baron:Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Other: Previously served as a consult on the Advisory Boards (May 2017).. Griffiths:Alexion Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis, Inc.: Research Funding; Astex/Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene, Inc: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sweet:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Wang:Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text