Maintenance of Long-Term Undetectable Minimal Residual Disease after Combination of Ibrutinib with Abbreviated Chemotherapy in the Icll-07 Filo Trial

Introduction In previously untreated, medically fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and no 17p deletion, there is current research interest in improving survival outcomes and potentially sparing some patients from the standard 6 cycles of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR). The phase II ICLL-07 (NCT02666898) trial, conducted by the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO), aimed to explore the efficacy of obinutuzumab and ibrutinib treatment induction for 9 months, followed by a minimal residual disease (MRD)-driven strategy. Methods Following assessment at Month 9, patients in complete response (CR) with bone marrow (BM) MRD <0·01% continued only ibrutinib 420 mg po daily for 6 additional months (I arm). Otherwise, patients received 4x4-weekly cycles of fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) and obinutuzumab 1000 mg iv, alongside continuing ibrutinib for 6 additional months (FCGA+I arm). Beyond Month 16, response was clinically assessed every 3 months and MRD in PB until Month 40 and every 6 months during 36 months. MRD assessment was by 8-colour flow cytometry (limit of detection 10-6). The primary objective was to demonstrate a 30% or higher rate of CR with BM MRD <0·01% at Month 16, by intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondary endpoints. ResultsBetween 10/2015 and 05/2017, 135 patients were enrolled. At Month 9, only 8% of patients reached CR with BM MRD <0·01%, and thus, in accordance with the MRD-driven strategy, were included in the I arm and continued only ibrutinib for 6 additional months. Most patients were included in the FCGA+I arm and received 4 cycles of FC and obinutuzumab, alongside continuing ibrutinib for 6 additional months. At Month 16, the ITT rate of CR with BM MRD <0·01% was 62% (84/135; 90% confidence interval [CI] 55−69). Of note, the primary objective was exceeded, and this high ITT rate was achieved with no more than 4 cycles of FC and obinutuzumab. The CR rate was 73% by investigator assessment versus 75% by an independent review committee. The PB and BM MRD <0·01% rate was 79%. The most common haematological adverse event (AE) was thrombocytopenia in 45 (34%) of 133 patients at grade 1−2 in Months 1−9 and in 43 (33%) of 130 patients at grade 1−2 in Months 9−15. The most common non-haematological AE were infusion-related reaction in 83 (62%) patients at grade 1−2 in Months 1−9 and gastrointestinal disorders in 62 (48%) patients at grade 1−2 in Months 9−15. A total of 49 serious AE occurred, most frequently infections (10), cardiac events (8) and haematological events (8). No treatment-related deaths occurred. After a median follow-up of 26.3 months, the 2-year PFS rate was 98% (95% CI 95−100) (Figure 1) and the 2-year OS rate was 97.5% (95% CI 96−100). The longitudinal follow-up of PB MRD in the entire cohort showed durability of a deep response, with a PB MRD <0.01% rate of 96% (n=92 evaluable patients) at Month 22 and 91% (n=85 evaluable patients) at Month 28. According to the treatment arm, in the FCGA+I arm, the PB MRD <0.01% rate was 99% at Month 22 and 93% at Month 28; by contrast, in the I arm, 77% of patients had PB MRD <0.01% at each of Months 22 and 28. The strategy achieved deep and durable molecular remission with a high level of undetectable (UD) PB MRD that was maintained over time, as shown in Figure 2. At Month 28, the rate of UD PB MRD was 83% in the FCGA+I arm versus 54% in the I arm. According to the immunoglobulin heavy gene variable (IGHV) mutational status, the PB MRD ≥0.01% rate at Month 28 was 4% for the mutated group versus 23% for the unmutated group (p=0.075, Fisher test). Conclusion These findings from the ICLL-07 trial demonstrated that, in previously untreated, medically fit patients with CLL and no 17p deletion, treatment induction with obinutuzumab and ibrutinib followed by an MRD-driven strategy yielded a high rate of CR with BM and PB MRD <0.01%, together with prolonged PFS and OS. With longer follow-up, including assessing the evolution of PB MRD, the response is maintained. This strategy could be an option in the first-line setting, although randomised trial evidence is needed. Disclosures Salles: Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Educational events. Leblond:Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Cartron:Roche, Celgene: Consultancy; Sanofi, Gilead, Janssen, Roche, Celgene: Honoraria. Cymbalista:Sunesis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Le Garff-Tavernier:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria. Letestu:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: speaker fee, expert contracts; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: speaker fee, expert contracts; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: speaker fee, expert contracts; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: speaker fee, expert contracts. Feugier:janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Switching to Nilotinib Is Associated with Continued Deeper Molecular Responses in CML-CP Patients with Minimal Residual Disease After ≥ 2 Years On Imatinib: Enestcmr 2-Year Follow-up Results

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.694.694 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 694-694 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Timothy P. Hughes ◽

Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽

Nelson Spector ◽

Brian Leber ◽

Ricardo Pasquini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Research Funding ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Molecular Responses ◽

The Difference ◽

Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 694 Background: Superior rates of deeper molecular responses were achieved with nilotinib vs imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials—newly diagnosed patients (ENESTnd) trial. In addition, the 12-month (mo) analysis of the ENEST—complete molecular response (ENESTcmr) study demonstrated that switching to nilotinib after a minimum of 2 years on imatinib led to increased rates of major molecular response (MMR) and deeper molecular responses vs remaining on imatinib. Results from ENESTcmr are presented here with minimum 24 mo of patient follow-up. Methods: Patients with Ph+ CML-CP who had achieved complete cytogenetic responses but still had persistent BCR-ABL positivity by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) after ≥ 2 years on imatinib were eligible. Patients (n = 207) were randomized to switch to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 104) or to continue on the same dose of imatinib (400 or 600 mg once daily [QD]; n = 103). Rates of MMR, MR4 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.01% according to the International Scale [IS], corresponding to a 4-log reduction), MR4.5 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.0032%IS, corresponding to 4.5-log reduction), and undetectable BCR-ABL via RQ-PCR with ≥ 4.5-log sensitivity were measured. Results: Among all randomized patients (intent-to-treat population), significantly more patients treated with nilotinib continued to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo (32.7% on nilotinib vs 16.5% on imatinib; P =.005; Table).The difference between the arms in achievement of this endpoint increased between 1 and 2 years (from 12.4% to 16.2%). The median time to MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL was also significantly faster on nilotinib than on imatinib (P = .005 and .003, respectively). Cumulative rates of MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL continued to be higher with nilotinib in patients without those responses at baseline, and the difference between arms appeared to increase over time. The safety profiles for nilotinib and imatinib were consistent with prior studies. By 24 mo, no patients in either arm progressed to accelerated phase/blast crisis. No patients on nilotinib died since the 12-mo analysis; 1 patient on imatinib died from metastatic prostate cancer in follow-up after discontinuation from the study. Conclusions: Switching to nilotinib led to significantly faster, deeper molecular responses in patients with minimal residual disease on long-term imatinib therapy. Since the 12-mo analysis, rates of deep molecular response (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) have remained significantly higher in patients who did not have the response at baseline and were switched to nilotinib (vs those remaining on imatinib). In fact, the difference in favor of nilotinib increased between 1 and 2 years. These results suggest that switching to the more potent, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib is beneficial in patients with minimal residual disease after long-term imatinib therapy. Achievement of these deeper molecular responses (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) after switching to nilotinib may enable a greater proportion of CML-CP patients to be eligible for future discontinuation studies. Cumulative rates of confirmed undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo will be presented as the confirmation assessments for several responders were not available at the time of this analysis. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; CSL: Research Funding. Lipton:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Spector:Novarits: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Leber:Novartis: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Schwarer:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Etienne:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Purkayastha:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Collins:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Szczudlo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Cervantes:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Updated Follow-Up In The CLL2007FMP Trial Supports The Non Superiority Of The Association Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide (FC) Plus Campath Compared To FC Plus Rituximab and Points Out The Importance Of Minimal Residual Disease, By 6-Color Flow Cytometry Technique, On Progression Free Survival

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.2870.2870 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 2870-2870

Author(s):

Pierre Feugier ◽

Remi Letestu ◽

Sylvie Chevret ◽

Thérèse Aurran ◽

Beatrice Mahe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Limit Of Detection ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Final Evaluation ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Color Flow ◽

Free Survival ◽

Minimal Residual

Abstract Introduction CLL2007FMP (fit medically patients) is a Randomized Phase-III Trial conducted by the French Cooperative Group on CLL and WM (FCGCLL/WM) and the “Groupe Ouest-Est d'Etude des Leucémies et Autres Maladies du Sang” (GOELAMS), comparing FC plus Rituximab (FCR) to FC plus Campath (FCCam) in previously untreated fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Early results showed that the FCCam regimen was associated with an unfavourable safety profile limiting significantly its use in this indication (Blood 2012). We present here the results of the extended follow up of the CLLFMP2007 trial, with particular emphasis on survival data, minimal residual disease (MRD) and late adverse events. Methods In this trial, 178 younger (<65) fit patients (pts) (cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) score of up to 6), were enrolled between November 2007 and January 2009. Cases with del(17p) were excluded. Pts were randomly assigned to receive 6 oral courses of FCR (n=83) or FCCam arm (n=82). The primary endpoint of the study was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were safety, response to treatment, overall survival (OS) and MRD. MRD evaluation was performed by 6-color flow cytometry in an oligocentric manner. MRD testing was scheduled before therapy initiation and at final evaluation, (i.e. 3 months after completion of immunochemotherapy) where it was to be assessed for all responding patients in both peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM). Recruitment was interrupted in January 2009 after 165 pts had been randomized due to an excess of mortality in the FCCam arm. Results PFS and OS were not significantly different between the two arms. With a median follow-up of 55.5 months (interquartile range, 50-60), 57 pts in the FCCam arm were free of disease progression compared with 50 in the FCR arm, with a 3-year estimated PFS at 81% in both arms (p=0.80). Fourteen pts died in the FCCam arm (7 from progression and 7 from toxicity) and 9 died in the FCR arm (all from progression), with a 3-year estimated survival at 90% vs. 88% (p=0.85). PFS was significantly impacted by IGHV mutational status (p=0.001), Binet stage (p=0.0002) and MRD level. At final evaluation, MRD was established using the result in PB samples (available for 120 patients) and was determined in 103 pts by combining the results from blood and BM samples. Interpretation was based firstly on the use of the classical 10-4 threshold as reference and secondly on the limit of detection of the technique (0.7x10-5). In MRD-positive patients, the median PFS was 44.7 months (PB) whereas it was not reached in the group with MRD lower than 10-4 (p<0.0001, figure 1) ; similar data were found in MRD-positive PB+BM patients with a median PFS of 46 months whereas it was not reached in the group with MRD lower than 10-4 (p=0.002). No significant difference was found regarding OS but follow-up is still short for this evaluation. Similar results were observed when considering the limit of detection of the MRD technique (data not shown). Late toxicities (occurring after the final evaluation at 3 months after the end of treatment or at the ninth month when treatment was prematurely stopped) included : 1 bile duct cancer, 1 myelodysplastic syndrome, 1 transient ischemic attack, 1 lung adenocarcinoma and one prostate cancer in the FCR arm and 3 febrile neutropenia, 3 pneumonia (1 due to legionella), 1 pneumococcal sepsis, 1 bronchitis, 1 toxoplasma eye infection, 1 pyelonephritis, 2 herpes zoster, 1 acrodermatitis, 1 subdural hematoma, 1 autoimmune thrombocytopenia, 1 agranulocytosis, 1 autoimmune haemolytic anaemia in the FCCam arm. Conclusion Results of this extended follow-up of the CLL2007FMP trial confirm the absence of superiority of the FCCam regimen on OS and PFS. Interestingly, longer follow-up did not reveal a higher rate of late toxicity in FCCam arm, notably in terms of secondary malignancies; Similarly to early toxicity, late was adverse events were mainly infectious. Finally, MRD status determined by 6-color technique in PB and/or BM at post-treatment evaluation was predictive of PFS whatever the treatment arm. This finding is in line with recent reports in other studies pointing out to the powerful value of MRD as prognostic factor, supporting its use as PFS surrogate primary endpoint in clinical trials. Disclosures: Feugier: roche: Honoraria. Cazin:roche: meeting invitation Other, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: meeting invitation, meeting invitation Other, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Heavy and Light Chain Monitoring in High Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM-CESAR Trial: Comparison with Conventional and Minimal Residual Disease IMWG Response Assessment

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128655 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1852-1852

Author(s):

Noemi Puig ◽

Teresa Contreras ◽

Bruno Paiva ◽

María Teresa Cedena ◽

José J Pérez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Minimal Residual

Introduction: The GEM-CESAR trial is a potentially curative strategy for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HRsMM) patients (pts) in which the primary endpoint is the achievement of bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. However, other methods of disease evaluation in serum such as heavy+light chain (HLC) assessment, with a potential complementary value to the IMWG response criteria, have also been tested. Aim: To evaluate the performance of HLC assay in HRsMM pts at diagnosis and after consolidation, comparing the results with standard serological methods and Next Generation Flow (NGF) for the assessment of bone marrow MRD. Patients and Methods: Ninety HRsMM pts included in the GEM-CESAR trial received six 4-weeks cycles of carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone followed by high dose melphalan and 2 further cycles of consolidation with the same regimen. All pts received maintenance treatment with lenalidomide for up to 2 years. SPEP and IFE were performed using standard procedures. Serum IgGk, IgGl, IgAk and IgAl HLC concentrations were measured using Hevylite (The Binding Site Group Ltd, Birmingham, UK) on a SPA PLUS turbidimeter. HLC concentrations and ratios were considered abnormal if they were outside the 95% reference ranges provided by the manufacturer. MRD was analyzed by flow cytometry following EuroFlow recommendations (sensitivity, 2x10-6). Standard response assignment was carried out as per the IMWG guidelines. Hevylite responses were assigned and HLC-pair suppression was defined as in Michalet et al (Leukemia 2018). Results: Out of 90 HRsMM pts, 75 had monoclonal intact immunoglobulin and samples available at diagnosis (50 IgG and 25 IgA). HLC ratio was abnormal in 98% of IgG pts and in 100% of IgA pts. Response assessment by Hevylite and standard IMWG criteria were available in 62 pts post-consolidation (Table 1). A good agreement was found between the two methods (kappa quadratic weighting = 0,6327 (0,4016 - 0,8638)). Among 46 pts with assigned CR as per the IMWG response criteria, there were 3 and 8 pts in PR and VGPR according to the Hevylite method, respectively. In 62 cases, paired Hevylite and MRD assessment data were available. Concordant results were found in 72.5% of cases (45/62; HLC+/NGF+ in 15 and HLC-/NGF- in 30 cases) while in the remaining 27.4% of cases results were discordant (17/62; HLC-/NGF+ in 6 and HLC+/NGF- in 11 cases). Post-consolidation, 24, 25.8 and 42.3% of the 62 samples were positive by SPEP, NGF and Hevylite, respectively. HLC-pair suppression was identified in 13/62 pts; 10 had severe HLC-pair suppression at the end of consolidation. After a median follow-up of 32 months (8-128), 93% of pts remain alive and progression-free. Three patients that have already progressed had their responses assessed post-consolidation. The first pt was assigned VGPR by the standard IMWG criteria and PR by Hevylite and was MRD positive by NGF; the second pt was assigned CR by IMWG criteria and Hevylite but had severe HLC-pair immunosuppression and was MRD positive by NGF; the third pt was in CR by IMWG and HLC criteria and was MRD positive by MFC. Conclusions: Moderate agreement was found between response assessment by Hevylite and the standard IMWG methods as well as between Hevylite and MRD assessment by NGF. Most discordances were a result of Hevylite detecting disease in samples negative by the standard methods, but longer follow-up is needed to ascertain its clinical value. HLC assessment could have anticipated the progression noted in 2 (out of 3) patients. Disclosures Puig: Takeda, Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; The Binding Site: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Paiva:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi and Takeda: Consultancy. Rodriguez Otero:Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy. Oriol:Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, Jansse: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rios:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alegre:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. de la Rubia:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. De Arriba:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Ocio:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bladé:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Irctures: Honoraria. Mateos:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmamar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EDO: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Phase III Study of Daratumumab/rhuph20 (nsc- 810307) + Lenalidomide or Lenalidomide As Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Maintenance Therapyin Patients with Multiple Myeloma (mm) Using Minimal Residual Disease Todirect Therapy Duration (DRAMMATIC study): SWOG s1803

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142913 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 21-22

Author(s):

Amrita Krishnan ◽

Antje Hoering ◽

Parameswaran Hari ◽

Rachael Sexton ◽

Robert Z. Orlowski

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

North America ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Research Funding ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Optimal Duration ◽

Minimal Residual

Background:Lenalidomide(Len) maintenance following autologous transplantation(ASCT) for multiple myeloma has improved progression free survival (PFS)and overall survival compared with placebo. Optimal duration of maintenance is unknown with considerable inter-trial variability. Depth of remission correlates with PFS, with patients (pts) in a minimal residual disease negative state (MRD) to a sensitivity of 10 -5 having a better PFS. Therefore, Len combinations that lead to higher MRD negativity rates are under study. The anti CD38 antibody Daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide in newly diagnosed MM pts showed a higher MRD negativity rates in the MAIA trial (NEJM2019). SWOGS1803 is testing this regimen as maintenance following ASCT while also assessing the optimal duration of maintenance in patients who achieve MRD negativity. Methods:Pts 18-75 years, with MM within 12 months of induction and without progression from diagnosis are eligible. Prior daratumumab therapy is allowed. Enrollment may be before or after ASCT with transplant being within 18 months from initial registration. Within 180 days from ASCT pts will undergo first randomization to Len or Len plus subcutaneous daratumumab/rHuPH20 maintenance (Len Dara). MRD will be assessed prior to start of maintenance and then annually. Randomized treatment will continue for two years at which time repeat MRD will be assessed for pts in VGPR or better. Pts who are MRD negative will undergo second randomization to either continue maintenance on their assigned arm or discontinue maintenance. The continued maintenance arm will stay on therapy for 7 years or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.(see schema) The primary objective of the trial is to compare OS between the two treatment arms (Len vs. LenDara). Secondary objectives include comparisons of overall response rate, PFS, and MRD negativity rate between the treatment arms. The objectives of the second randomization are to compare OS of MRD negative pts who continue maintenance on each arm vs. those who discontinue. An early read out of the trial will be the 24 month MRD analysis after all pts have been accrued. A total of 1100 pts will be accrued to initial step 1 to allow for a 5% drop out and allow 950 pts for the second randomization. As of Aug 1, 171 pts are enrolled for screening among whom 133 have been randomized. Figure 1 Disclosures Krishnan: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Stock BMS, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; Sutro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Z Predicta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy. Hari:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Orlowski:STATinMED Research: Consultancy; Laboratory research funding from BioTheryX, and clinical research funding from CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, Exelixis, Janssen Biotech, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Founder of Asylia Therapeutics, Inc., with associated patents and an equity interest, though this technology does not bear on the current submission.: Current equity holder in private company, Patents & Royalties; Amgen, Inc., AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, EcoR1 Capital LLC, Forma Therapeutics, Genzyme, GSK Biologicals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Biotech, Juno Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Legend Biotech USA, Molecular Partners, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Serial Minimal Residual Disease Evaluation in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Under Long-Term Venetoclax Treatment

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114048 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1876-1876

Author(s):

Thomas Lew ◽

Mary Ann Anderson ◽

Constantine S. Tam ◽

Sasanka Handunnetti ◽

Dennis Carney ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Minimal Residual

Abstract Background The selective BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (Ven) achieves an overall response rate of approximately 75-80% as a single agent in relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (RR-CLL/SLL)1. At one year ~75% of patients (pts) are progression-free at the approved monotherapy dose of 400 mg/day1,2 and Ven is the only novel agent with a significant rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (MRD-neg)3. The temporal pattern of MRD levels and systematic long term follow up of pts stratified by their MRD status on Ven have not been reported. We report the long term outcomes according to MRD status for 59 pts with RR-CLL/SLL who attained objective disease response to Ven, and the temporal patterns of change in MRD. Methods We reviewed the clinical outcomes to July 2018 of 67 pts with RR-CLL/SLL enrolled since June 2011 on early phase clinical studies of Ven at our two hospitals. Analysis was restricted to the 59 pts who achieved a partial response or complete response by iwCLL criteria. Pts initially received 150-1200mg Ven/day (45 ≥400mg/day) on one of three ongoing trials: Phase 1 Ven monotherapy (NCT01328626) (n=36), Phase 1b Ven plus rituximab (NCT01682616) (n=14), or Phase 2 Ven monotherapy in del(17p) CLL/SLL (NCT01889186) (n=9). For this analysis MRD-negativity was defined as <1 cell in 10-4 leukocytes by ERIC criteria, or no cells with a CLL phenotype when <400,000 cells were analyzed in an assay with a minimum sensitivity of 0.1%. Of those pts reported as MRD-neg this was confirmed at a level of 10-4 in 71%4. Unless otherwise specified, MRD-neg refers to status in the bone marrow (BM) and pts who were not tested were considered to be MRD-pos (n=2 pts). Landmark analyses of time to progression (TTP) by MRD status used the median time to achievement of MRD-neg. Fisher exact test was used to assess the association of clinical, biological and treatment variables with achievement of MRD-neg. TTP and time to MRD-neg were estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier, and comparisons among groups used the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Results Of the 59 pts who achieved an objective response to Ven, 21 (36%) achieved MRD-neg in the BM and 26 (44%) in the PB. Of the 38 pts who did not achieve BM MRD-neg, 36 (95%) had at least one BM assessment on treatment; the two remaining pts did not clear MRD in the PB. The strongest positive predictor for the achievement of BM MRD-neg was treatment with Ven plus rituximab (9 of 14 [64%]) achieved vs 13 of 45 [27%] on Ven monotherapy (p=0.02)). Complex karyotype was a negative predictor in pts receiving ≥400mg/day. TP53 aberrant state (mutation and/or del(17p)), bulky adenopathy >5cm and fludarabine-refractoriness were not significantly associated with achievement of MRD-neg, irrespective of dose (table 1). The median time to MRD-neg was 8.2 (range 2 - 46) mths for BM (fig 1A) and 5 (range <1 - 50) mths for PB, with 22/26 (85%) pts who achieved PB MRD-neg doing so within 12 mths of starting Ven. 25/26 had a contemporaneous or subsequent BM aspirate and 20 (80%) achieved BM MRD-neg after a median of 3 (<1 - 17) further mths. After a median follow up of 25 (range 2 - 55) mths since attainment of BM MRD-neg, 8/21 (38%) pts have developed confirmed re-emergence of BM MRD, and a further 2 pts have re-developed PB MRD-pos. Median time to reemergence of BM MRD has not been reached (59% BM MRD relapse free at 2 years post attainment). In a landmark analysis from median time to BM MRD-neg (8.2 mths), TTP by iwCLL criteria was significantly longer among BM MRD-neg pts (n = 21; median TTP 65 mths [95% CI 47 - undefined]) than BM MRD-pos pts (n = 31; median 22 mths [95% CI 14 - 39]; Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.11; p<0.0001) (figure 1B). Similar patterns held for the equivalent landmark analysis according to PB MRD (HR 0.21; p = 0.0002). Conclusions Venetoclax frequently induces BM MRD-neg, and pts achieving BM MRD-neg have very durable responses. Combined Ven plus rituximab increases the rate of BM MRD-neg. With Ven therapy, PB MRD status appears to be a reasonable surrogate for BM MRD status, but further validation is required. Achievement of BM MRD-neg should be the aim of therapy with Ven and Ven-based combination approaches may be the most effective way to achieve this.Roberts; N Engl J Med; 2016;374:311-22.Stilgenbauer; Lancet Oncol; 2016;17:768-78.Seymour; Lancet Oncol; 2017;18:230-40.Rawstron; Leukemia; 2016;30:929-36. Disclosures Lew: Walter and Eliza Hall: Employment, Patents & Royalties. Anderson:Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding; Walter and Eliza Hall: Employment, Patents & Royalties. Tam:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Honoraria, Other: Travel funding; Beigene: Honoraria, Other: Travel funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Travel funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Roberts:AbbVie: Research Funding; Walter and Eliza Hall: Employment, Patents & Royalties: Employee of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research which receives milestone and royalty payments related to venetoclax; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Seymour:Celgene: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Minimal Residual Disease in the Maintenance Setting in Myeloma: Prognostic Significance and Impact of Lenalidomide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v130.suppl_1.904.904 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽

pp. 904-904

Author(s):

Ruth M de Tute ◽

David Cairns ◽

Andy Rawstron ◽

Charlotte Pawlyn ◽

Faith E. Davies ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Research Funding ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Powerful Predictor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

End Of Treatment ◽

Minimal Residual ◽

Support Research

Abstract Introduction. Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a powerful predictor of outcome in multiple myeloma (MM). A recent meta-analysis has confirmed this and demonstrated a hazard ratio for PFS of 0.41; 95% CI, 0.36-0.48; P < .001 (Munshi et al, JAMA Oncol, Jan 2017). We have previously demonstrated the prognostic impact of MRD both following ASCT in transplant-eligible (TE) patients and following induction in transplant non-eligible (TNE) patients. There is more limited data on the applicability and significance of MRD assessment in the maintenance setting, largely as a consequence of high rates of drop-off historically within myeloma trials but improved outcomes have seen larger numbers of participants with samples at later timepoints. Patients and Methods. This analysis aims to assess the impact of MRD on PFS amongst patients receiving maintenance or no further therapy in the NCRI Myeloma XI trial. In this study patients were randomised between thalidomide (CTD) and lenalidomide (RCD) based induction therapies. For patients with a sub-optimal response to initial therapy, induction was supplemented with sequenced bortezomib-based induction (CVD). Intensively treated patients then proceeded to an autologous transplant and then responding patients from both intensive and non-intensive arms were subsequently randomised to maintenance with lenalidomide monotherapy, lenalidomide and vorinostat or no further therapy. Bone marrow aspirates were obtained prior to maintenance randomisation (100 days post ASCT for TE and at the end of (sequenced-) induction treatment for TNE) and 6 months post maintenance randomisation. This analysis represents a subset of 389 patients (median age 63.5 years) with an informative post maintenance randomisation bone marrow aspirate. MRD was assessed using flow cytometry (sensitivity 0.004%) with a minimum of 500,000 cells evaluated with six- or eight-colour antibody combinations including CD138/CD38/CD45/CD19/CD56/CD27 in all cases and CD81/CD117 added latterly. Results. Taking the group as a whole, MRD-negativity was demonstrated in 206/389 (55.8%) and this was associated with a significant outcome advantage as the median PFS was >50 months versus 20 months for MRD-positive patients (Fig.1(a), p<0.0001, HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.11-0.37). When the pre-maintenance MRD result was also taken into account, outcome was best for patients achieving negativity post ASCT/end of treatment and remaining MRD-negative and worst for those patients who were MRD-positive post ASCT/end of treatment and remained so (Fig 1(b), p<0.0001). Conversions to MRD-negativity were seen in 32% of MRD-positive patients on maintenance compared to 4% of patients randomised to no further therapy (p=0.0045). This conversion is associated with some improvement in outcome, but this group still have inferior outcome relative to those patients achieving MRD-negativity earlier in protocol treatment. Conversions to MRD-positivity were also seen in 24 (9.5%) of 252 patients and the outcome for this patient group was similar to that of the patients who remain MRD-positive throughout (Fig. 1(b)). For those patients that remained MRD-positive, a benefit from maintenance could be demonstrated by a lower level of residual disease relative to those patients on observation (median level of neoplastic plasma cells 0.15% on maintenance vs 0.39%, p=0.04). Conclusions. We would conclude that MRD is a particularly powerful predictor of outcome in the maintenance setting and is clearly a desirable therapeutic goal in this patient group. The hazard ratio of 0.2 demonstrated here appears superior to those demonstrated in previous studies examining post induction or ASCT time-points. Approximately one third of MRD-positive patients receiving maintenance became MRD-negative and maintenance therapy also results in a decrease in disease levels in those patients remaining positive. These results support the role of MRD monitoring in assessment of the efficacy of different maintenance/consolidation strategies within clinical trials. In the longer term, a stratified approach to treatment based on sequential MRD assessments is feasible. The predictive ability of MRD during maintenance will be assessed with respect to overall survival when the primary endpoint matures in September 2017 and presented at the meeting. Disclosures Rawstron: BD biosciences: Patents & Royalties; Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pawlyn: Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Janssen: Other: Travel support; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel support. Davies: Bristol-Myers: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jones: Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding. Kaiser: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses; Chugai: Consultancy. Drayson: Abingdon Health: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jenner: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support , Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gregory: Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jackson: Celgene: Honoraria; J&J: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria. Morgan: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers: Consultancy, Honoraria. Owen: Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Post Induction and Post Consolidation Measurable/Minimal Residual Disease Predict Relapse in NPM-1 Positive AML. Outcome of Treatment Relapse. a Single Center Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126074 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2695-2695

Author(s):

Erika Borlenghi ◽

Chiara Pagani ◽

Michele Malagola ◽

Diego Bertoli ◽

Francesca Schieppati ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Disease Status ◽

Salvage Treatment ◽

Late Relapse ◽

Molecular Monitoring ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Minimal Residual

Although the ELN MRD Working Party (Schuurhuis, 2018) recommends that Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients (pts) with mutated NPM1 (NPM1+) should have molecular assessment of measurable/minimal residual disease (MRD), the most clinically significant timepoints (TPs), the thresholds, the best source of samples, bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) and especially the management of molecular relapse, remain controversial. We evaluated the prognostic significance of NPM1 molecular monitoring, its impact on disease recurrence and the outcome of salvage treatment. From Jul 2010 to dec 2018, 83 consecutive NPM1+ AML pts (M/F: 44/39; median age 59 y, 27-74) eligible for intensive chemotherapy (i-T) were treated, according to the NILG-AML00 protocol (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT00400673): ICE (idarubicine-ARAC-etoposide) as induction, followed by IC consolidation and 3 further consolidation cycles of high-dose ARAC. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (HSCT) was considered at relapse. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to detect NPM1 mutation (Gorello, 2006) on BM and PB samples at diagnosis (TP0) and at given TPs: at complete remission (CR) (TP1), post-IC (TP2), post-1st ARAC consolidation (TP3) and at the end of treatment (TP4). Serial MRD monitoring during follow-up was made on PB every 3 months (mo) for 5 years (y) or until relapse. Molecular relapse (mR) was defined as the NPM1 level increase at least 1 log in 2 consecutive samples, in absence of hematological relapse (hR). At baseline, karyotype (K) was abnormal in 8 pts (9.6%); 25 (30%) were FLT3-ITD mutated with a median Allelic Ratio (AR) of 0.35 (range: 0.2 to 2.18) (Pratcorona, 2013). During treatment, 608 samples were studied (383 BM and 225 PB), for a median of 8 per patient (range: 3 to 10). At TP1, a higher level of NPM1 unfavorably impacted on relapse (p 0.02) and a cut-off >200 *10^4/ABL was significantly associated with a higher relapse risk (RR) (68.7%) and lower RFS (p 0.006). Moreover, MRD positivity (value >0*10^4 NPM1/ABL) at TP2 on PB was associated to a higher RR (38.8%; p 0. 041) and a level >0.5*10^4/ABL allowed to predict relapse in 75% of pts, also impacting on RFS (p 0.0001) (Figure 1).Molecular NPM1 relapse/progression occurred in 10 pts early during treatment, after a median of 3.5 mo (1.4-6) from diagnosis and in 8 of them simultaneously with hR. In 16 pts mR occurred after a median CR duration of 18.5 mo (10.5-61.5) (late relapse). Hence a mR was more frequent in late than in early relapse (87.5% vs 20%; p 0.001). Median survival was 8.3 mo in early relapsing pts and was not reached in late relapsing pts (p. 0.0002). Age, NPM1 level at TP0, FLT3-ITD mutation, ITD-AR or abnormal K did not impact on type of relapse (mR or hR), but FLT3-ITD was more frequent in early than late relapse (60% vs 18.7%; p 0.04). After a median follow-up of 42 mo (4-108), 5-y relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival were 64.2% (+/-6.5% SE) and 71.1% (+/-6.1% SE), respectively. Overall, considering both mR and hR, 26 pts (31.3%) relapsed after a median of 13.5 mo after CR; 24/26 pts received a salvage treatment and 14 (53.8%) (median age 49y, 27-64) could proceed to HSCT after a median of 2.9 mo (5 too old, 7 early progression). Salvage treatment before HSCT was i-T in 7/14 and non-i-T in 7/14 pts (2 ATRA and 5 D-actinomycin, Falini 2015) for a median of 3 cycles (range 2-4). Disease status at HSCT was: mCR in 3 pts, CR with detectable MRD (median NPM1: 125*10^4/ABL, range 17.8-3849) in 9, refractory in 2 pts. Nine/14 HSCT pts (64.2%) are alive and in remission at a median of 29.6 mo (13-49) from HSCT, 2 pts died of sepsis in c-GVDH at 6.2 and 37.5 mo after HSCT, 1 died of VOD and 2 of disease progression. At 3 months after HSCT all MRD positive pts were NPM1 negative. mR occurred in 3 pts at 8, 12 and 15 mo after HSCT and was successfully treated with early pre-emptive donor lymphocyte infusions. With the limits of small numbers, age, type (mR or hR) or timing of relapse (early or late), disease status at HSCT, donor source and conditioning intensity didn't influence survival. Our study shows that PCR monitoring during treatment can identify pts at higher RR according to the transcript levels in BM and PB samples. In NPM1+ AML, molecular monitoring in PB during follow-up is of crucial importance in detecting late molecular relapse allowing to use less toxic molecular-oriented treatments as a bridge to HSCT. Further studies on larger cohorts hopefully will help to confirm its usefulness to guide the treatment approach. Disclosures Rossi: Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: D-actinomicin

Download Full-text

Longitudinal Assessment and Prognostic Importance of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) By Multiparametric Flow Cytometry in Patients with Systemic Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149615 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3767-3767

Author(s):

Andrew Staron ◽

Eric Burks ◽

Vaishali Sanchorawala

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Negative Group ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Clone Size ◽

Major Organ ◽

Minimal Residual

Abstract Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment can provide an index of robust disease control, particularly if MRD negativity is sustained over time. Whereas MRD status has well-established prognostic implications in multiple myeloma, its role in light chain (AL) amyloidosis-a related but biologically distinct plasma cell disorder-is presently under investigation. Aims: The aims of our study were to evaluate (1) major organ deterioration-progression-free survival (MOD-PFS) based on MRD status and (2) MRD evolution patterns during disease surveillance for patients with AL amyloidosis in hematologic complete response (hemCR) after therapy. Methods: We established MRD status using multiparametric 10-color flow cytometry of bone marrow aspirates. At least 2 x 10 6 events were measured using a Beckman Coulter Navios Flow Cytometer and analyzed by Kaluza Software (sensitivity level of ≤10 -5). Sequential MRD testing was performed (≥12 months apart) for patients returning for follow-up. We evaluated hematologic and organ responses or progression based on consensus guidelines (Palladini, 2012). MOD-PFS was defined as time from hemCR achievement to major organ deterioration (i.e., the kidney or heart), hematologic progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first). Presence of MRD was not used to guide treatment decisions. Results: A total of 96 patients with hemCR after therapy were tested, of whom 46 (48%) were MRD negative and 50 (52%) MRD positive on first assessment. The median estimated clone size for those with MRD positivity was 3.4 x 10 -4 (range 1.4 x 10 -5 to 5.7 x 10 -3). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for greater use of daratumumab and ≥2 lines of therapy to achieve hemCR in the MRD-negative group. MRD positivity correlated with a higher level of involved free light chains (iFLC) in the serum at the time of MRD assessment (23.4 mg/L vs 17.3 mg/L, P = .011). In regard to organ responses, patients with MRD negativity had a significantly higher rate of renal response (91% vs 67%, P = .017) but a similar rate of cardiac response (74% vs 68%, P = .668). After a median follow-up of 50 months from hemCR achievement, the MRD-negative group demonstrated a superior MOD-PFS (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.88, P = .034). Progression or organ deterioration events in the MRD-negative group occurred early after hemCR achievement, while in the MRD-positive group these events continued to occur over time. A total of 8 patients had died, including 4 in each group. Sequential MRD testing (median 12 months apart, range 12-28 months) was performed for 43 patients, of whom 16/19 (84%) had sustained MRD negativity; 21/24 (88%) had persistent MRD positivity; and 6/43 (14%) had MRD conversion. No patient received therapy between MRD assessments. Among those with sustained MRD negativity, there were 2 major organ deterioration events. The 3 patients who experienced loss of MRD negativity (which occurred at 12, 107 and 114 months after last treatment) had no progression or organ deterioration events. Of those with persistent MRD positivity, 13 (62%) had durable hemCR and organ responses; moreover, 4/14 (29%) and 1/11 (9%) of these patients attained even deeper renal and cardiac responses, respectively, in the interval between sequential MRD testing. Clone progression (defined as >1-log growth in MRD clone size) was observed in 3/21 (14%) patients with persistent MRD positivity, none of whom demonstrated hematologic relapse. Conclusions: We evaluated the dynamics of MRD status in relation to clinical outcomes and found that patients with MRD negativity had longer survival free from hematologic progression, major organ deterioration or death. Longer prospective follow-up is needed to determine whether this translates into an overall survival benefit. MRD conversion occurred in a small proportion (14%) of patients, but was not linked to adverse outcomes. Understanding the role of cross-sectional MRD testing for clinical disease tracking in AL amyloidosis requires further analysis with larger sample size. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sanchorawala: Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sorrento: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Regeneron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Proclara: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptide: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Venetoclax and Azacitidine for Older Newly Diagnosed Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Institution Pilot Study Using Measurable Residual Disease to Guide Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122120 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2638-2638 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Amanda Winters ◽

Jonathan A Gutman ◽

Enkhtsetseg Purev ◽

Brett M. Stevens ◽

Shanshan Pei ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Refractory Disease ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Ras Pathway ◽

Measurable Residual Disease ◽

Count Recovery

Background: Venetoclax (ven) was approved for older untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients due to high response rates and durable remissions. As a participating site in the dose escalation study, we observed deeper/more durable responses in some who received >400mg ven. We also noted 16/33 discontinued azacitidine (aza) after achieving a response; 9 relapsed and 7 remained in long term remission on ven only. Based on these observations, we designed a study that hypothesized: A)Higher initial doses of ven would allow deeper/more durable responses, and B)Multi modality high sensitivity measurable residual disease (MRD) testing could identify patients able to discontinue aza and remain on maintenance ven. Methods: This is an ongoing phase 2 study (NCT03466294) of 42 untreated AML patients ≥60 who decline/are ineligible for induction. Patients have adequate organ function and white blood cell counts <25x109/L (hydrea permitted). In cycle 1, patients receive aza 75mg/m2 on days (d) 1-7 and ven, escalated from 100 to 200 to 400 to 600mg on d 1-4. Ven continues at 600mg d 5-28 and bone marrow biopsies (BMBXs) are performed on d 8 and 28. Patients who achieve morphologic remission without count recovery have up to 14 days off therapy before subsequent cycles, with growth factor support; "upgraded" responses are recorded if count recovery occurs. Non responders discontinue or receive up to two additional cycles of aza and ven 600mg. Responders who remain MRD+ by multiparameter flow cytometry (MPFC, Hematologics) and/or digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for as many identifiable diagnostic genes as possible also receive up to 2 additional cycles of aza and ven 600mg. MRD+ responders after 3 cycles continue aza and ven 400mg until toxicity/progression. Patients who experience MRD- responses at any time stop aza and continue ven 400mg daily (Fig 1). Results: 30 patients enrolled between May 2018 and July 2019; median age is 71 (60-88), 10% evolved from MDS and 10% and 73% had intermediate and unfavorable risk disease by ELN, respectively (Table 1). 732 adverse events (AEs) occurred; 46 (6%) were serious, the most common were neutropenic fever (37%) and pneumonia (13%). The most common >grade 2 related AEs were leukopenia (53%), thrombocytopenia (44%) and neutropenia (35%); there were no related grade 5 AEs. The overall response rate was 70% (21/30; CR=19, MLFS=2). Median number of cycles to achieve best response was 1. Significant blast reductions were seen on day 8; of the 28 with interpretable day 8 BMBXs, 10 achieved MLFS on day 8. 4 completed ≥1 cycle and were refractory. An additional 4 did not complete cycle 1: 1 died of disease and 3 elected to come off therapy (all subsequently died of disease). Four (19%) responders relapsed, after a median 180 days (27-279). With median follow up of 214 days, median response duration has not been reached. 10 patients died, after a median 65 days (29-256); 1/30 died within 30 days. Median overall survival has not been reached. Of the 26 who completed ≥1 cycle, 19 were MRD- by MPFC, including 18/19 who achieved CR. Of these 26, 3 were not monitored by ddPCR: for 2 patients this was due to the absence of detectable baseline mutations and for 1 patient it was due to refractory disease. The remaining 23 had ddPCR monitoring; 3 became MRD- by this modality (Fig 2). All 3 were also MRD- by MPFC and per protocol discontinued aza and initiated ven maintenance (Fig 1). MRD negativity by both parameters occurred after cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively. One MRD- patient relapsed after 216 days; two remain in remission after 301 and 124 days. An additional 4 who achieved MRD+ responses discontinued aza at their insistence (and in violation of the protocol); 1 relapsed after 279 days, and 3 remain in ongoing remission. Univariate predictors of refractory disease were FAB M0/M1 (OR 0.070, p=0.02) and RAS pathway mutations (OR 14.25, p=0.02). Conclusions: Higher initial doses of ven are tolerated in this population. Blast reduction occurs quickly in many patients (day 8), for this low intensity regimen. Response rates are consistent with lower doses of ven. Very deep responses, as measured by highly sensitive MRD methods (MPFC and ddPCR are capable of sensitivity up to 0.02%), are attainable. Longer follow up time will determine if higher ven doses and MRD-driven decisions related to continuation of aza result in more durable responses. Increased maturation of blasts and RAS pathway mutations are predictors for refractory disease. Disclosures Lyle: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pollyea:Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celyad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Diachii Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Minimal Residual Disease Eradication with Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134237 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 12-14

Author(s):

Alexander Coltoff ◽

Joseph G. Jurcic ◽

Peter Campbell ◽

Daniel J. Lee ◽

Mark L Heaney ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Institutional Research ◽

Negative Group ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Research Grants

Introduction The combination of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax with an HMA (HMA/Ven) has improved outcomes in previously untreated patients with AML not eligible for intensive induction therapy. In a phase Ib study, 67% of patients achieved a complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete recovery of blood counts (CRi) with a median overall survival (OS) of 17.5 months (DiNardo CD et al. Blood 2019; 133(1):7-17). HMA/Ven has also demonstrated efficacy in a heavily pretreated population with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML, the majority of whom had prior HMA exposure (DiNardo CD et al. Am J Hematol 2018; 93(3):401-7). Measurable residual disease (MRD) is recognized as an independent prognostic indicator important for risk stratification and treatment planning (Schuurhuis GJ et al. Blood 2018; 131(12):1275-91). To date, however, there have been few reports on the effect of HMA/Ven on MRD. Methods This is a retrospective case series of patients with AML at a single-center tertiary-care institution. Patients ≥ 18 years of age who were treated with HMA/Ven between January 2017 and June 2020, either in the upfront or salvage setting, for AML were included. Outcomes included CR/CRi rate, MRD response, relapse free survival (RFS), and OS. MRD was assessed via multicolor flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 10-3 (0.1%). Results Nineteen patients were identified, 12 (63%) of whom were female. The median age at the time of HMA/Ven initiation was 71 years (range, 21 - 87 years). Ten (53%) patients had de novo AML and 9 had secondary or therapy-related AML. By 2017 ELN criteria, 3 (16%) patients had favorable-risk, 9 (47%) had intermediate-risk, and 7 (37%) had adverse-risk AML. Nine (47%) patients had R/R AML; 5 received HMA/Ven as first salvage therapy, and 4 as 2nd or greater salvage. Three (16%) patients had prior HMA exposure. No patient had prior venetoclax exposure. Median follow-up was 9.1 months (range, 1-21.1 months). Ten (53%) patients received azacitidine and 9 (47%) were given decitabine. Venetoclax doses ranged from 50 to 400 mg daily, depending on participation in a clinical trial and concomitant medications. Eight patients achieved a CR and 7 patients achieved a CRi for a combined CR/CRi rate of 79%. The CR/CRi rate was 90% (9/10) in the upfront setting, and 66% (6/9) in the salvage setting. The median time and number of cycles to best clinical response was 2.3 months (range, 0.9-3.9 months) and 2 (range, 1-3 cycles), respectively. Eleven (73%) of the 15 responders achieved MRD clearance after a median of 2 cycles (range, 1-3 cycles) (Table 1). Two of 4 (50%) MRD-positive patients relapsed, while 4 (36%) of 11 MRD-negative patients relapsed (Figure 1). Relapse occurred at a median of 2.0 months (range, 1.3-2.7 months) in the MRD positive group and 11.0 months (range, 2.8-14 months) in the MRD negative group. One patient died of infectious complications while MRD negative. Three patients, all of whom were treated for R/R disease, proceeded to an allogeneic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Two were MRD negative at the time of HSCT and all remained in remission. At the time of data cutoff, 7 (64%) of 11 MRD-negative patients were alive, and all 4 MRD-positive patients were alive. Causes of death in the MRD-negative group included disease relapse (3 patients) and infection (1 patient). Median overall survival in the entire cohort (range, 32 days-NR) was not reached. Conclusions HMA/Ven was highly effective as both upfront and salvage therapy. Surprisingly, the salvage CR/CRi rate in this series was 66%, allowing half of the responders to proceed to HSCT. The majority (73%) of responders achieved MRD negativity. While MRD status influenced RFS, 36% of MRD-negative patients relapsed. Additionally, the same percentage of MRD-negative patients died during follow-up, versus none of the patients with MRD-positivity. This indicates the need for more sensitive methods to assess MRD and for novel therapeutic strategies to eliminate MRD, thereby improving long-term outcomes. Larger prospective studies are needed to define the role of MRD assessment with venetoclax-containing regimens. Disclosures Jurcic: AbbVie:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Celgene:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Syros Pharmaceuticals:Research Funding;PTC Therapeutics:Research Funding;Arog Pharmaceuticals:Research Funding;Kura Oncology:Research Funding;Forma Therapeutics:Research Funding;Astellas:Research Funding;Genentech:Research Funding;Novartis:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Daiichi-Sankyo:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;BMS:Consultancy, Research Funding.Campbell:AstraZeneca:Consultancy.Lee:Genentech:Research Funding;Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc.:Research Funding;AbbVie:Research Funding;Novartis:Research Funding;Bayer:Research Funding;Celgene:Consultancy;Forty Seven:Research Funding.Heaney:Blueprint Medicines Corporation:Research Funding;BMS:Research Funding;CTI Biopharma:Consultancy, Research Funding;Deciphera:Research Funding;Incyte:Research Funding;Novartis:Consultancy, Research Funding;Sierra Oncology:Research Funding;AbbVie:Consultancy;Partner Therapeutics:Consultancy.Lamanna:Janssen:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Octapharma:Research Funding;Juno:Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Gilead:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Astra Zeneca:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Pharmacyclics:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Genentech:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Bei-Gene:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Abbvie:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Oncternal, Verastem, TG Therapeutics:Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;MingSight:Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Loxo:Research Funding;Celgene:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Columbia University Medical Center:Current Employment.

Download Full-text