scholarly journals Similar Survival with Deferred Versus Salvage Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Light Chain Amyloidosis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4579-4579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Luan ◽  
Koen Van Besien ◽  
Paul J Christos ◽  
Roger Pearse ◽  
Danielle Guarneri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Renal Amyloidosis ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant

Background: Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is characterized by deposition of misfolded monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains leading to organ dysfunction. AL amyloidosis has traditionally been treated with agents used in multiple myeloma, primarily alkylators, proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), and high-dose melphalan/autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). A retrospective study comparing patients with AL amyloidosis who underwent ASCT as frontline therapy ('upfront ASCT') to those undergoing ASCT following induction ('deferred ASCT') revealed that deferred ASCT was associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) compared to upfront ASCT (Afrough et al, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2018). Given the number of effective new therapies for AL amyloidosis, the potential to delay ASCT after one or more lines of therapy ('salvage ASCT') is feasible. To our knowledge, transplant outcomes of AL amyloidosis patients undergoing deferred vs salvage ASCT following at least one relapse have not been reported. A retrospective chart review was conducted to compare AL amyloidosis patients receiving deferred vs salvage ASCT for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Weill Cornell Medical College. Methods: Twenty-four patients with AL amyloidosis who underwent deferred or salvage ASCT between 2000-2018 were included in the analysis. Patients who underwent upfront ASCT without induction chemotherapy were excluded. Demographics and clinical parameters were extracted from the electronic medical record. PFS was calculated from date of ASCT to first relapse and OS was calculated both from date of diagnosis and date of ASCT to death. Patients were censored if lost to follow-up prior to experiencing the relevant event. PFS as well as OS of patients who underwent deferred vs salvage ASCT were compared. Log-rank tests were used to statistically evaluate differences between Kaplan-Meier PFS/OS curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) using deferred ASCT as the reference treatment. Results: Among the 24 patients included in this analysis, 13 underwent deferred ASCT with 1 prior line of chemotherapy (e.g., induction), and 11 underwent salvage ASCT with a median of 3 prior lines (Table 1). Ten patients had cardiac amyloidosis, 15 had renal amyloidosis, and 6 had multi-organ involvement. Induction regimens received in the deferred group are included in Table 1. Neither PFS nor OS was significantly different between patients receiving deferred vs salvage ASCT. After median follow-up of 2.9 years, median PFS in patients who received deferred ASCT was 6.5 years and not reached in those who received salvage ASCT (P=0.47), with a HR of 1.74 (95% CI, 0.38-7.85) (Figure 1A). Median OS from date of ASCT was not reached in either group after a median follow-up of 2.8 years (P=0.52), with a HR of 2.16 (95% CI, 0.19-24.04) (Figure 1B). Similarly, median OS calculated from date of diagnosis was not significantly different between deferred vs salvage ASCT (P=0.79) (Figure 1C). Conclusions: In this cohort of 24 AL amyloidosis patients, no significant differences in PFS or OS were seen between patients undergoing deferred ASCT following induction vs salvage ASCT following multiple lines of therapy. Unlike the superior OS seen with deferred vs upfront ASCT, our findings show that either deferred or salvage ASCT may be associated with comparable outcomes and suggest similar OS despite timing of transplant. However, it is important to note the small sample size and that none of our patients received daratumumab-based regimens which may have improved PFS/OS in either or both groups. There were also small differences between groups in use of maintenance (1 vs 3 patients in the deferred and salvage groups, respectively) and proportion of patients receiving higher doses of melphalan 200mg/m2 vs 140 mg/m2 (69% vs 55% in deferred and salvage groups, respectively). Nevertheless, the lack of difference seen in PFS and OS between the two groups suggests that eventual hematologic relapse and organ progression with death occur at similar time intervals despite timing of ASCT. This speaks to the point that in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis as well as later in the disease, achieving deep responses to prevent organ progression and death regardless of timing of ASCT remains an important treatment goal. Disclosures Van Besien: Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Coleman:Kite Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Gilead, Bayer, Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky:Takeda, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rosenbaum:Janssen: Research Funding; Honoraria Akcea: Other: Accordant Health.

The Role of Total Body Irradiation (TBI) in the High-Dose Regimen of Patients with Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Treated with Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) in the Rituximab Era. A Retrospective Study of the EBMT Lymphoma Working Party

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 502-502
Author(s):  
Inas El-Najjar ◽  
Ariane Boumendil ◽  
Jian Jian Luan ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Dose Regimen ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Data Set ◽  
High Dose Regimen

Abstract Abstract 502 Background and Aims: Rituximab has become an essential component of FL treatment, either in combination with chemotherapy or as maintenance. However, there is not much data available regarding the influence of prior rituximab on the survival of patients after ASCT. In addition, there is no consensus regarding the best type of high-dose regimen. The aim of this study is to assess the outcome of patients with FL having ASCT according to the high-dose regimen and previous treatment with rituximab. Patients and Methods: Between 1995 and 2007, 7910 patients with FL had their 1st ASCT and were reported to the EBMT registry. A full data set was available for 2233 patients who had ASCT with either TBI containing regimens or BEAM, and constitute the study group. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method, and curves were compared by log-rank test. In multivariate analysis, the relevance of prognostic factors was estimated using Cox regression model. Incidence of relapse (IR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were calculated by cumulative incidence curves compared by Gray's test. Multivariate analysis of IR and NRM used Fine and Gray model. Results: Six hundred and eighty patients received a TBI-containing regimen, and 1553 patients BEAM. Seven hundred and thirteen patients (32%) had been treated with monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) before ASCT (confirmed as rituximab in 665). Patients who had TBI were younger (median age: 47) than patients who underwent BEAM (median age: 49; p<0.001), and were transplanted in 1st remission more frequently (61%) than BEAM patients (44%, p<0.001). In contrast, more patients treated with BEAM had received MoAb prior to ASCT (37%) than TBI patients (21%, p<0.001). Peripheral blood was the source of stem cells in 98% of patients having BEAM in comparison with 92% of patients having TBI (p<0.001). After a median follow-up of 60 months, the median overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 146 months and the median EFS, 72 months. Multivariate models for analysis of prognostic value of TBI were all adjusted on disease status at transplant, age, previous MoAb, time from diagnosis to ASCT, and source of stem cell and significant risk factors are shown in the table. In addition there was a trend for patients receiving TBI to have a better OS than patients receiving BEAM (p=0.06). Moreover, females had better EFS (p = 0.011) and OS (p = 0.058) in univariate analysis. However, the gender survival curves did not fulfil the proportional hazards assumption and thus the multivariate analysis of OS and EFS were stratified on gender allowing no estimation of its effect on outcome. Conclusions: In contrast to observations made in patients autografted before 1995 (Montoto Leukemia 2007), in the present series (with a shorter follow-up) the beneficial effect of TBI over BEAM in terms of relapse prevention was not counteracted by an increased NRM, resulting in a significantly better EFS with TBI in the rituximab era. Unlike reported for aggressive lymphoma, use of MoAb (rituximab) prior to ASCT had no detrimental impact on outcome and in fact was associated with significantly better OS. The superior survival of female patients in the rituximab era needs to be confirmed in further studies. Disclosures: Blaise: Laboratoire Pierre Fabre: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Rambaldi:Italfarmaco S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gribben:Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. Montoto:Genentech: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Utilization of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5701-5701
Author(s):  
Justin King ◽  
Mark A. Fiala ◽  
Scott R. Goldsmith ◽  
Keith E. Stockerl-Goldstein ◽  
Mark A. Schroeder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Equity Ownership

Historically, high-dose therapy in combination with autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) was reserved for younger patients. In more recent years, the use of ASCT has expanded in the older population. However, there is still limited data on the utilization and efficacy of ASCT in older patients, particularly those over the age of 75. To further evaluate this issue, we retrospectively analyzed all patients with newly diagnosed MM between the ages of 75-78, the institutional cutoff for ASCT eligibility, that were referred to the stem cell transplant unit at our institution for consultation from the years 2012-2018. Baseline characteristics, anti-myeloma treatments, and patient outcomes were abstracted through chart review. Seventy-five patients were referred to our institution. 71% were male, 29% female. 39% patients were considered ineligible for ASCT by the consulting transplant physician. Most patients were considered transplant ineligible due to comorbidities or poor performance status. Of the 46 patients eligible for ASCT, 52% underwent the procedure during their first-line therapy. The majority of those patients received reduced intensity melphalan (140 mg/m2) while 2 patients received conventional dosing (200 mg/m2). The other 22 patients eligible for ASCT declined or elected to defer the procedure and to be treated with conventional therapy. The characteristics of these three groups were similar and are detailed in Table 1. After a median follow-up of 30 months, 25% of the patients had expired. Estimated median overall survival (OS) was 71.3 months (unable to quantitate 95% CI) for all patients. Compared to transplant eligible patients, regardless of transplant receipt, those who were transplant ineligible had a 186% increase risk for death (HR 2.86; 95% CI 1.12-7.35; p = 0.029). There was also a notable trend for longer OS in those who underwent ASCT compared to those who were eligible but declined the procedure, but it was not statistically significant (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.10-1.28; p = 0.114). At a transplant center, two-thirds of patients referred for newly diagnosed MM between the ages 75-78 were considered eligible for ASCT and one-third underwent the procedure. Outcomes were better for patients eligible for ASCT, regardless of whether they underwent the procedure. There was also a trend for better OS in patients who underwent the procedure compared to those who declined. While small sample sizes and the retrospective nature of the study limit our ability to draw conclusions, it appears that ASCT has an OS benefit among patients age 75-78. Disclosures Fiala: Incyte: Research Funding. Stockerl-Goldstein:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Abbott: Equity Ownership. Vij:Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wildes:Janssen: Research Funding; Carevive: Consultancy.

Outcome of High Dose Melphalan with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant In Myeloma Associated with AL Amyloidosis

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2400-2400
Author(s):  
Simrit Parmar ◽  
Mubeen Khan ◽  
Gabriela Rondon ◽  
Nina Shah ◽  
Qaiser Bashir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Abstract 2400 Background: Approximately 10% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have clinically overt primary systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, and about 30% have concurrent occult AL amyloidosis. The impact of concurrent AL amyloidosis on the prognosis of myeloma is not well known. High-dose melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto HCT) has shown significant activity in both MM and AL amyloidosis. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who had concurrent MM and AL amyloidosis and underwent auto HSCT with high dose Melphalan at MDACC between 01/1998 to 05/2010. We identified 41 patients with concurrent MM and AL amyloidosis. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Twenty -six patients had occult AL amyloid, while 15 had clinically overt disease. Results: Median age at auto HSCT was 56 years (39-77), 58.5% being male with median follow up of 58.7 months from the time of diagnosis and 42.5 months from auto HCT. The median time from diagnosis to auto HCT was 8.9 mos (2.7-102.4 mos). 39% had Salmon Durie Stage III disease and 36.6% had more than one involved site at the time of transplant.Cytogenetic abnormalities were detected in 24.4% of patients. Post transplant hematologic responses were as follows: ≥CR=10 (24%), ≥VGPR=16 (39%), >PR=33 (80.5%), ≥stable disease= 40 (97.6%). Among the patients with overt organ involvement, one had early death. Of the 15 evaluable patients, organ responses were scored using the published consensus guidelines for amyloidosis and were as follows: PR=5 (33.3%), ≥SD=7 (46.7%). No correlation was seen between organ response and hematologic response. The 100-day treatment related mortality (TRM) was 0 and 1-year TRM of 2.4% which is comparable to patients transplanted for MM alone at our center. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from auto HCT were 33.8 and 58.3 months, respectively.The median PFS and OS from diagnosis were 49.8 and 96 mos, respectively. In multivariate analysis, creatinine ≥ 2mg/dl was associated with a shorter PFS (p=0.043) and hemoglobin <10g/dl showed a trend towards a shorter PFS (p=0.093). None of these variables (Hb <10g/dl, Age>60yrs, Creatinine≥2mg/dl, B2M >3.5mg/l, BM plasma cells>30%) emerged as significant predictors of OS. There was no significant difference in outcome between patients with occult or symptomatic AL amyloidosis for OS (p=0.24) or PFS (P=0.9) Conclusion: In this analysis the outcome of patients with concurrent MM and AL amyloidosis was comparable to patients with MM alone. We believe these patients are acceptable candidates for auto HCT. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Weber: novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Orlowski: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Plerixafor and G-CSF For Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization In AL Amyloidosis: A Single Center Experience

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4516-4516
Author(s):  
Esha Kaul ◽  
Gunjan L Shah ◽  
Chakra P Chaulagain ◽  
Raymond L. Comenzo
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Background Risk-adapted melphalan and stem cell transplant (SCT) is standard initial therapy for a minority of patients with systemic AL amyloidosis (Blood 2013;121: 5124; Blood 2011;118: 4298). Stem cell mobilization is often accomplished with high dose G-CSF (16μg/kg/d) (Blood 2011;118:4346). In the current era with effective new agents such as bortezomib, many AL patients are receiving initial therapy and achieving profound rapid cytoreduction with organ improvement (Blood 2012;119:4391; Blood 2011;118:86). But not all patients respond and in some cases the duration of response is limited. In addition, the use of SCT for consolidation after an initial response, although reasonable, has not been systematically evaluated. Whether SCT is employed as consolidation or as a second- or third-line option, the efficacy and tolerance of mobilization become important issues. Because AL patients have organ involvement limiting chemotherapy-based mobilization options, we decided to explore the option of Plerixafor and G-CSF for stem cell mobilization, based on the phase III experience in MM (Blood 2009;113:5720). We now report the first experience with this mobilization approach in AL. Patients and Methods Patients were evaluated and diagnosed by standard criteria including, in all cases, tissue biopsies showing amyloidosis. They were mobilized and collected between 4/16/12 and 6/19/13 with G-CSF 10μg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC) for 5 days (continued through collection process) and Plerixafor adjusted for renal function starting on day 4 and continuing until collection was completed. Results We report on 10 patients whose median age at mobilization was 58 years (range 46-72), 60% of whom were men. Median number of organs involved was 2 (range 1-3). Heart and kidneys were the most frequently involved organs (7 patients in each group). Median time from diagnosis to mobilization was 9 months (range 2-123). Eight patients had received prior bortezomib-based therapy. The median number of cycles was 3 (range 0-6). One had received a prior MEL 140 transplant 10 years prior and had relapsed, and 2 were treatment naïve, one of whom was 1 year status post orthotopic heart transplant. At the time of mobilization, 3 patients had non-responsive hematologic disease, 3 had achieved PR, 1 VGPR and 1 had achieved CR. Five patients had a creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL including 2 patients on hemodialysis. The target cell dose was 10x106CD34/kg for all but one patient (with previous history of transplantation). The median number of collections was 2 (range 2-3). On day one, the median number of CD34+ cells collected per kg was 3.6 x106 (0.4-6x106) and on day two 6.4 x106 (2.7-19x106). The median total CD34+ cells collected per kg was 12.5x106 (5-18x106). Two patients had grade 1 bleeding from the catheter site during apheresis and one patient had dyspnea with suspected fluid overload which responded to a single dose of intravenous furosemide. There were no significant toxicities observed with Plerixafor in mobilization. All patients went on to receive high dose chemotherapy with melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant. The median length of hospital stay was 25 days (18-32). The median stem cell dose infused was 7.6x106CD34/kg and median days to ANC > 500 was 11 (10-22), to platelets > 20K untransfused 22 (15-44) and to lymphocytes > 500/μl 14.5 (11-25). One patient who had VOD and persistent thrombocytopenia was given the remainder of his stem cells on day +31 with full recovery and normalization of the blood counts by day +65. Conclusions In the era of more effective initial therapies, an era in which AL patients are living longer, many with moderate organ damage, mobilization with Plerixafor and G-CSF was well tolerated and made it possible to collect ample numbers of CD34+ cells with limited leukaphereses in previously treated patients and in those with advanced renal failure. This approach not only allowed the collection of sufficient CD34+ cells for optimal immediate stem cell dosing but also permitted the cryopreservation of aliquots for post-SCT boost and potentially for future cell-based therapies. Disclosures: Comenzo: Millenium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding.

Patterns of Relapse Among Myeloma Patients Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4524-4524
Author(s):  
Prashanth Kumar ◽  
Nisha Joseph ◽  
Dhwani Almaula ◽  
Lawrence H Boise ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Biochemical Relapse ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Symptomatic Relapse

Abstract Introduction: In younger patients that are transplant-eligible, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) prolongs overall survival based on several prospective randomized control trials. Nevertheless, ASCT is not a curative approach and majority of the patient's relapse, requiring further salvage therapeutic options. However, in the face of an ongoing paradigm shift in myeloma therapeutics, there is a significant knowledge gap regarding how patients relapse following ASCT. We analyzed the patterns of relapse among myeloma patients after ASCT. Methodology: We have evaluated a total of 975 patients that underwent ASCT during the period January 2008 through June 2014 from our myeloma database. 273 patients had documented evidence of first relapse post-ASCT on the laboratory parameters, radiologic or pathologic findings based on IMWG criteria for relapse. We categorized the relapses as biochemical vs symptomatic, and described their frequencies and characteristics. Median time of follow up from diagnosis is 68 months and from ASCT is 54 months. We used IBM SPSS version 23.0 to generate the survival statistics. Results: Median time from ASCT to relapse is 20 months. A total of 182 (66.7%) patients (105M, 77F) experienced biochemical relapse, while 91 (33.3%) patients (50M, 41F) had symptomatic relapse. More IgA patients (30.8% vs 23.1%, p=0.06) relapsed as symptomatic myeloma. While characterizing relapses, we did not find any differences in symptomatic relapses by the risk group [high risk (31.3%) vs standard risk (31.9%), p=0.193, ISS stage I (29.3%) vs II (32.9%) vs III (32.8%), p=0.807] or by maintenance [yes (30.7%) vs no (38.1%), p=0.211]. Among the patients that had a symptomatic relapse, presence of new bone lesions (52%) and anemia (42%) are the most common forms of relapse seen. Only 4% presented as hypercalcemia and 1% presented as renal failure illustrating the benefits of closer follow up. Overall survival is similar among patients that relapsed as biochemical or symptomatic relapse (log rank, p=0.105). More importantly, impressive median OS of 145 months from the ASCT among this entire cohort (at median follow up 54 months, figure 1). Conclusions: Two-thirds of the patients relapse as a biochemical relapse post-ASCT. The patterns of biochemical vs symptomatic relapses were similar among patients by maintenance, by risk status and also by the ISS stage. The significant improvement in OS among the entire cohort emphasizes the power of the new therapeutic salvage strategies aimed at gaining the survival advantage even among this selected group of patients undergoing early relapses. Disclosures Kaufman: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Lonial:Novartis: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Nooka:Spectrum, Novartis, Onyx pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy in Multiple Myeloma: A Single Institution Case Series

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4736-4736
Author(s):  
Alfredo De La Torre ◽  
Andrew Gao ◽  
Timo Krings ◽  
Donna E. Reece
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Jc Virus ◽  
Brain Mri ◽  
Brain Biopsy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant

Abstract Introduction Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), caused by the John Cunningham (JC) virus, is an infection that requires immunosuppression for its manifestations and is fatal disease in many cases. (1) After asymptomatic primary infection, which occurs in childhood, the virus remains quiescent. (1,4) The classical clinical presentation is that of a subacute symptomatology that develops over weeks or months and consists of diverse sensorimotor abnormalities depending on the site of brain involvement. Approximately 22 cases of PML amongst patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have been reported in the literature between 1965 and April 2020. (5) Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of all myeloma patients who were treated at the Princess Margaret Cancer Center from 2010-2020 to identify cases of PML. Patient and disease characteristics, responses, and survival outcomes were collected from Myeloma and Stem Cell Transplant databases and electronic patient records under REB approval. Results We identified 3 cases of PML in MM patients at our center over the past 10 years, all of which occurred in patients receiving therapy containing an immunomodulatory derivative (IMID), i.e., thalidomide, lenalidomide or pomalidomide. Patient 1 A 52-year-old male with kappa light chain MM presented in 2009 on hemodialysis and received upfront bortezomib and dexamethasone followed by melphalan 200mg/m 2 and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in March 2010; maintenance with thalidomide was given until July 2011 when he presented to the ER with left-sided weakness, facial droop, and decreased strength. CT scan showed right-sided hypodensity in keeping with demyelination. PML was confirmed by MRI, lumbar puncture with positive PCR for JC virus, and a brain biopsy (Fig 1 A-C). He was treated with mirtazapine, and also developed status epilepticus controlled with phenytoin and phenobarbital. His myeloma treatment was never resumed after the diagnosis of PML due to concerns about viral reactivation. Approximately 3 years after PML diagnosis, his serum free kappa protein levels started to increase; he remained on hemodialysis but experienced no new myeloma-related organ damage and no myeloma treatment was offered. His last follow-up in clinic was in March 2019. However, he succumbed to S. pneumonia septicemia in July 2019. Case 2 A 68-year-old female with IgG kappa MM diagnosed in 2004 was treated with high-dose dexamethasone induction followed by melphalan 200mg/m 2 and ASCT and relapsed 2 years later. She commenced cyclophosphamide and prednisone until July 2011 when treatment was changed to lenalidomide and prednisone; subsequent progression in February 2014 was treated with pomalidomide/bortezomib/prednisone. In November 2014, we noticed worsening vision. Brain MRI showed hyperintensity in T2 in the occipital lobe. Her myeloma treatment was stopped and she received corticosteroids with no improvement. LP in January 2015 was positive for JC virus and the diagnosis of PML was made. She was managed with supportive measures. Her last clinic follow-up was in 2015 and the patient died from progression in September 2015. Case 3 A 52-year-old male with IgA lambda MM diagnosed in 2015 was treated with CYBOR-D induction followed by melphalan 200mg/m 2 and ASCT. He initially received lenalidomide maintenance which was changed to bortezomib due to toxicity. On progression in January of 2019 he was placed on a clinical trial of the anti-BCMA antibody drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone on which he achieved a VGPR. In October 2020, he developed confusion and memory problems, as well as involuntary twitching. A brain MRI showed possible demyelination Two LPs were negative for JC virus, but a targeted brain biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of PML (Fig 1 D-F). His myeloma treatment was discontinued, and he was started on mirtazapine. At his most recent clinic visit in May 2021 his speech, memory and functional status had improved considerably and there were no signs of myeloma progression. Conclusion Our current series of PML in MM showcases the potential contribution of IMIDs and other novel agents--such as the newer monoclonal antibodies like belantamab mafotidin-- to the reactivation of JC virus and subsequent PML. Our series also demonstrates that neurologic improvement and longer survival can be observed with earlier management. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Reece: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Induction Therapy with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis: Our Experience

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5907-5907
Author(s):  
Sandeep Jain ◽  
Luciano J Costa ◽  
Robert K Stuart ◽  
Saurabh Chhabra ◽  
Alice Mims ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cardiac Involvement ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Introduction: The optimal treatment approach for systemic AL amyloidosis remains unclear. Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the only modality associated with long term survival, but failure to show survival benefit in randomized clinical trial raises doubts about its efficacy 1, 2. Outcomes after ASCT are better in patients who achieve complete hematologic response after the ASCT3. One report has shown improved outcomes with combining one dose of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib with high dose melphalan as part of conditioning regimen 4. Preliminary data from a recent study suggest that the outcome of treating AL amyloidosis with two cycles of bortezomib and dexamethasone followed by ASCT was superior to the outcome of the ASCT alone5. We describe our experience with giving 4-6 cycles of bortezomib and dexamethasone induction prior to high dose melphalan and ASCT in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis. Patients and methods: We included all patients who underwent autologous transplant for symptomatic systemic AL amyloidosis at our institution from October 2010 till June 2014. Five patients were included in the analysis and patient characteristics are described in table 1. All patient received 4 -6 cycles of induction with bortezomib and dexamethasone followed by autologous stem cell transplant using high dose melphalan (200 mg/m2). One patient also received six cycles of lenalidomide and dexamethasone prior to bortezomib based induction for lack of response. Hematologic and organ response were assessed using the definitions from the 10th International symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis. Overall survival was calculated by Kaplan Meyer’s method using Graphpad Prism 6.0 software. Results: There was no transplant related mortality. After median follow up of 13 months (12-25 months) all patient are alive. Toxicities from the ASCT were mostly cytopenias in the immediate post-transplant period which were managed as per the standard of care. Two patients achieved hematological complete response while one more had very good partial response and other two achieved partial response. Of the four patients with nephrotic range proteinuria, two patients had > 95% reduction in proteinuria, one had > 75% reduction in proteinuria and another patient had > 50% reduction in proteinuria. One patient had Liver involvement with elevated alkaline phosphatase which normalized post-transplant (table 2). The responses were maintained on last follow up and none of the patient had hematological or organ relapses. Discussion: Bortezomib alone and in combination with steroids has shown efficacy in AL amyloidosis, but its role in induction prior to high dose melphalan/ASCT to help achieve deeper hematological response is unknown. Our experience shows that this combination may be highly efficacious without significant toxicity. Limitations of our study include the small number of patients and absence of any patients with cardiac involvement, which is a worse prognostic marker. We conclude that the bortezomib and dexamethasone induction followed by high dose melphalan/ASCT for AL amyloidosis should be studied in prospective trials. Table 1.Patient Characteristics n=5Age, years 51.2 (44-62)Race (Caucasian)4 (80%)Gender ( female)3 (60%)Cardiac involvement 0 (0)Renal involvement 4 (80%)Serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 0 (0)Organ involvement ≥21 (20%)BM plasma cells > 10%1 (20%)Hgb ≤ 10 g/dl0 (0)LVEF <50%0 (0)Induction therapy Bortezomib/dexamethasone only4 (80%)Lenalidomide/dexamethasone + Bortezomib/dexamethasone1 (20%) Table 2. Outcomes n=5 Baseline After ASCT Hematologic response n=5 M protein 0.772 gm/dl 0.096 gm/dl 2 CR, 1 VGPR, 2 PR Renal response n=4 24 hours proteinuria 3.13 gm 0.432 gm 2 > 95% reduction, 1 >75% reduction, 1 >50 % reduction. Liver response n=1 Alkaline phosphatase 700 IU/L 62 IU/L Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Induction with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (BD) Followed By Risk Adapted High Dose Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and BD Consolidation in Patients with AL Amyloidosis: A Phase II Feasibility Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3178-3178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Landau ◽  
Nicole Montanez ◽  
Alexandra Cowan ◽  
Hoover Elizabeth ◽  
Carlos Flombaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Critical Determinant

Abstract Background: The depth and durability of hematologic response is a critical determinant of outcome in patients (pts) with light chain (AL) amyloidosis. Complete hematologic remissions (CR) following risk-adapted melphalan and stem cell transplant (RA-SCT) in pts with AL amyloidosis is associated with organ improvement and extended overall survival (OS). We have previously shown that using bortezomib and dexamethasone (BD) as consolidation following RA-SCT is associated with deeper hematologic responses and favorable outcomes. We have conducted a prospective phase II trial using BD as induction followed by RA-SCT and BD consolidation to determine the safety and hematologic and organ response rates of this treatment program for newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible pts with AL amyloidosis. Methods: Untreated pts with AL amyloidosis received 1-3 cycles of BD (B 1.3mg/m2, IV/SC, and D 40mg, IV/PO, days 1, 4, 8, 11). BD was discontinued before 3 cycles in patients who achieved CR. Pts were then assigned melphalan 100, 140 or 200mg/m2 based on age, renal function and cardiac involvement; Starting 3 months following RA-SCT, pts received six cycles of BD (B 1.3mg/m2, IV/SC and D 20mg, IV/PO days 1, 8, 15, 22) every 12 weeks as consolidation. Hematologic responses were assessed using International Society of Amyloidosis criteria (Palladini et al. JCO 2012) and organ responses using updated criteria (Palladini et al. Blood 2014), after induction, 3 months post RA-SCT, and at 12 and 24 months from treatment initiation. Patients with New York Heart Association Class III/IV heart failure, ECOG > 2 or > grade 2 neuropathy were ineligible. Results: Twenty pts, 70% male, with a median age of 60.1 years with renal (55%), cardiac (65%), liver/GI (15%) or nervous system (15%) involvement received BD induction and 18 patients have been transplanted. Two pts with cardiac disease died during BD induction (10% TRM); 85% of pts are alive with a median follow up of 28 mo. By intent to treat, 60% and 70% of patients achieved at least a very good partial response (>VGPR) following BD induction and RA-SCT, respectively. Overall, 95% of patients achieved hematologic responses (>PR) including 35% CR. Cardiac and renal responses were seen in 75% (N=8) and 60% (N=10) of evaluable pts at 1 year following treatment initiation. Most common grade >3 adverse events included GI (40%), Renal (30%), infectious (10%), and cardiovascular (10%); Grade 2 or higher neuropathy was seen in 40% of pts and warranted discontinuation of BD consolidation in 35% of pts. Conclusion: In newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis pts, BD induction followed by RA-SCT was safe and rapidly and effectively induced responses resulting in organ improvement. There was 10% TRM during BD induction and no deaths during transplant supporting the notion that early mortality in newly diagnosed AL pts is independent of treatment received. The high incidence of neuropathy may be related to the administration of BD on a twice weekly schedule and rendered some pts ineligible for post-transplant therapy. Whether transplant-eligible pts will ultimately derive more benefit from proteasome inhibitor induction versus consolidation is worthy of further study. Disclosures Landau: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Prothena: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding. Landgren:Celgene: Honoraria; International Myeloma Foundation: Research Funding; BMJ Publishing: Consultancy; Onyx: Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy; BMJ Publishing: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; Medscape: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria. Giralt:TAKEDA: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding; SANOFI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hassoun:Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Rituximab Plus Hypercvad (R-HCVAD) Alternating with Rituximab Plus High-Dose Methotrexate-Cytarabine (R-M/A) in Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Prolonged Follow-Up Confirms High Rates of Failure-Free Survival (FFS) and Overall Survival (OS).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 128-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Enrique Romaguera ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Maria A. Rodriguez ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
Barbara Pro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Pulmonary Hemorrhage ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Cell Transplant

Abstract Introduction: Aggressive MCL has a poor prognosis with a 21-40% complete remission (CR) after CHOP and a duration of response of only 10-16 months. More intense therapy could improve these statistics. Rituximab is effective in MCL and has minimal toxicity. Methods: A prospective phase II trial of R-HCVAD (considered to be one cycle) alternating every 21 days with R- M/A (considered to be another cycle) as described earlier (Ann Oncol. 13, suppl 2, 2002 #24). Prophylaxis with mesna, calcium leucovorin, prednisone eyedrops, G-CSF, antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral therapy. CBC with differential and platelet counts X 2-3/week. Re-staging every 2 cycles including upper and lower endoscopies. Patients in complete remission (CR) after 6 courses of a planned 6-8 cycles were not offered consolidation with stem cell transplant. Post-treatment evaluation was performed every 3 months for 1 yr, every 4 months for 2 yrs, every 6 months for 2 years, then annually. Results: Of 100 patients registered, one was ineligible and two decided to not receive the treatment after registration, leaving 97 evaluable for analysis of response, survival and toxicity. An analysis of response after the first 6 cycles shows an 87% CR/CRu rate. With a median follow up of 40 months, the 3-year FFS and overall survival (OS) were 67% and 81%, respectively. Adverse factors for FFS were: Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was significant. Five patients died during treatment of sepsis (3), pulmonary hemorrhage (1), and unknown cause (1). Four patients developed myelodysplasia/acute myelogenous leukemia after treatment and while in CR and three have died, for a total of 8 deaths in the study (8%). Conclusion: R-HCVAD alternating with R-M/A without stem cell transplant is an effective regimen for treatment of aggressive untreated MCL, specially for patients ≤ 65 years old. Toxicity is as expected for an intense regimen. This encouraging data warrants continued follow-up and comparison with existing/new therapies in future trials.

Serum Free Light Chain Responses after High-Dose Intravenous Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for AL (Primary) Amyloidosis.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 942-942
Author(s):  
Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽  
Daniel G. Wright ◽  
Barbarajean Magnani ◽  
Martha Skinner ◽  
David C. Seldin
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Free Light Chain ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Serum Free ◽  
Hematologic Response ◽  
Serum Free Light Chain

Abstract AL amyloidosis is caused by a clonal plasma cell dyscrasia and characterized by widespread, progressive deposition of amyloid fibrils derived from monoclonal Ig light chains, leading to multisystem organ failure and death. Aggressive treatment of AL amyloidosis with high-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant (HDM/SCT) can induce hematologic and clinical remissions and extend survival. Several approaches have been used to define hematologic responses of plasma cell dyscrasias underlying AL amyloidosis following HDM/SCT and other forms of treatment. The definition of a hematologic complete response (CR) that we have used requires that there be no evidence of a persistent monoclonal gammopathy by immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) of serum and urine proteins, or of persistent plasmacytosis or plasma cell clonality in a bone marrow biopsy by immunohistochemistry. Others have defined hematologic response as a ≥ 50% reduction in free light chain (FLC) measurements. Hematologic responses by both criteria correlate with survival and clinical improvement following HDM/SCT. We have carried out a retrospective analysis of HDM/SCT treatment outcomes for patients with AL amyloidosis to determine the extent to which hematologic CR, by our standard criteria, correlates with FLC response. Serum free light chain concentrations (FLC) were measured by a sensitive nephelometric immunoassay in 67 patients with AL amyloidosis before and after treatment with HDM/SCT. After treatment with HDM/SCT, 27 patients (40%) achieved a CR by standard criteria. Of these 27 patients, 63% (n=17) demonstrated normalization of FLC levels and an improvement of ≥50% in FLC occurred in 100%. Of the 40 patients who did not achieve a CR, 25% (n=10) experienced normalization of FLC levels, and an improvement of ≥50% occurred in 78% (n=31), while only 5 patients (13%) experienced no significant change in FLC. The average improvement in FLC was 94% for patients who achieved a CR by standard criteria and 72% for those who did not (p=0.0001, t-test). Thus, HDM/SCT was found to induce improvements in FLC levels of ≥50% in the vast majority of AL amyloidosis patients treated with HDM/SCT (87%, or 58/67). These data indicate that a decrease in FLC of ≥50% is a substantially less stringent indicator of hematologic response than is CR, as defined by standard criteria. Nonetheless, these measures of hematologic response are complementary, since decreases in FLC can be detected earlier following treatment than changes in IFE and marrow studies required to determine CR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document