hematologic response
Recently Published Documents
TOTAL DOCUMENTS
H-INDEX
Dose Reductions Related to Adverse Effects in Patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Treated with the BTK-Inhibitor Ibrutinib
Abstract The BTK-inhibitor ibrutinib is the first FDA approved therapy for Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and produces overall response rates >90% and long-term disease control in both treatment naïve and previously treated patients. Despite the remarkable efficacy of ibrutinib, dose reduction is often required for intolerance. In this study, we analyzed those patients requiring a dose reduction and evaluated the time to dose reduction, the symptoms leading to dose reduction, the rate of improvement in symptoms after dose reduction, and the hematologic response at 12 months after dose reduction. 385 patients received treatment with ibrutinib in our clinic from May 2012 through October 2020. Their baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Starting dose for these patients was 560 mg (n=11); 420 mg (n=358); 280 (n=15); 140 mg (n=1). Approximately 1/3 of all patients were treatment naïve at the time ibrutinib was initiated. Anemia, constitutional symptoms, and symptomatic hyperviscosity (or risk of hyperviscosity) were the most common reasons for treatment initiation. Reasons for dose reduction are shown in Table 2. Ninety-five patients (25%) required at least one dose reduction of ibrutinib. Twenty-three patients (6%) required a second dose reduction. Of the patients requiring dose reductions, 1 patient started at 280 mg and reduced to 140 mg, 91 patients started ibrutinib at 420 mg (1 patient ultimately had dose reduction to 70 mg, 22 patients to 140 mg, and 68 patients to 280 mg), and three patients started ibrutinib at 560 mg in the setting of Bing-Neel syndrome (2 patients had dose reduction to 420 mg and 1 patient to 280 mg). Patients requiring a dose reduction had a median age of 71 years (range, 46-96) at the time of ibrutinib initiation versus 66 years (range, 40-93) for those not requiring a dose reduction (p<0.001). Forty-five patients (47%) of patients requiring dose reduction were female versus 98 (34%) not requiring dose reduction (p=0.017). Median time to first dose reduction was 7.3 months (range, 0.5-75) and median time to second dose reduction from initiation of ibrutinib was 23 months (range, 3-75). Of the 95 patients requiring a dose reduction, 40 patients (42% of all patients with dose reductions) had improvement in at least 1 of the medication side effects after the initial dose reduction. Twenty-two patients (23%) had complete resolution of adverse effects. Twenty-six patients (27%) had no change in symptoms and 10 of these patients required an additional dose reduction. After the second dose reduction, 5 patients had improvement or resolution in symptoms. Two patients had no adverse effects prior to dose reduction and medication was reduced simply due to drug interaction. Of the 48 patients with 1-year hematologic follow-up data available, 10 patients (21%) had improvement in hematologic response and 35 patients (73%) maintained their hematologic response despite dose reduction. Three patients (6%) had worsening of hematologic response after dose reduction. In conclusion, one quarter of WM patients in this series on ibrutinib required a dose reduction due to development of intolerable medication side effects. In the majority of these patients, adverse effects improved or resolved with dose reduction. Importantly, hematologic response remained stable or improved in most patients despite dose reduction. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Treon: BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eli Lily: Research Funding; Abbvie/Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Castillo: Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.
Abstract Aims Life expectancy of CML pts optimally responding to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is close to that of the general population and recently, TFR has been acknowledged as a new goal of CML management. TKI discontinuation in the view of TFR requires the achievement of deep and long-lasting molecular responses (MR). The gold standard BCR-ABL mRNA quantification technology and MR definitions rely on internationally standardized (IS) RT-qPCR but atypical transcripts located outside the Major-BCR region, harbored by 1-2% of pts, cannot be expressed on the IS scale. Thus, most trials and clinical practice recommendations prevent such pts from attempting TFR. The Fi-LMC group retrospectively collected real-life observations to assess TFR likelihood in this rare population. Methods Data from CML pts with precise characterization of atypical transcripts in whom any line TKI was stopped for any reason but after at least 2 years of undetectable molecular residual disease (UMRD) by individualized non-standardized RT-qPCR were collected. RT-qPCR sensitivity varied depending on transcript type and local molecular biology laboratory. TFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Relapse was analyzed using the cumulative incidence function, relapse being as UMRD loss at any time and any level during follow-up (FU). Results Our series comprised 16 adult CP CML pts with atypical BCR-ABL fusions including 12 males (75%). Median age at CML diagnosis was 56 years (range: 21-75) and that at TKI discontinuation was 67 years [range: 29-82]. Sokal score was low, intermediate and high in 7, 8 and 1 pts, respectively. ELTS score was low and intermediate in 10 and 4 pts, respectively and unknown in 2. Most pts expressed e19a2 (n=6) followed by e6a2 (n=4), b3a3 (n=3), b2a3 (n=2) and e8a2 (n=1). Seven pts discontinued imatinib, 4 stopped dasatinib, 4 nilotinib and 1 bosutinib. Number of lines of therapy was 2 in 8 pts, 1 in 5 pts and 3 in 3 pts. Median TKI treatment duration before discontinuation was 64 months (range: 31-218) and median duration of UMRD was 41 months (range: 21-168). The median FU after TKI discontinuation was 68 months (range: 3-149). Five pts experienced relapse leading to TKI resumption. Four relapses occurred within 3-6 months and included 2 loss of hematologic response in CP, 1 loss of hematologic response in accelerated phase CML and 1 molecular recurrence with BCR-ABL transcripts up to 1.5%. One relapse occurred at 49 months and consisted in loss of a complete cytogenetic response. These 5 pts resumed TKI and regained UMRD within 6 months, including 1 pt who died in UMRD from non-CML-related cause at the age of 82 years and 1 pt who rapidly failed a 2 nd TKI discontinuation attempt. In 1 additional pt, BCR-ABL transcripts became detectable intermittently with maximum transcript level of 0.15% and TKI was not resumed. The median FU of pts who remained treatment-free was 68 months (range: 8-149). Overall, the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse regardless of whether TKI was resumed was 41.6% (95% confidence interval: 21.9%-78.7%) (Figure 1). The 5-year TFS rate was 65.2% (95% confidence interval: 40.3%-90.2%) (Figure 2). Conclusions Our observational study of TKI discontinuation in CML pts with atypical BCR-ABL transcripts is the largest reported so far. While effort must be made for proper assessment of deep MR, preliminary results suggest that TFS pattern might favorably compare with that obtained in pts with Major-type BCR-ABL transcripts. However, relapses may be more aggressive and caution is required in order to avoid loss of hematologic responses and progression. Whether the type of atypical fusion gene influences TKI discontinuation outcome, as well as other potential prognostic factors, need to be determined in a larger series. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Charbonnier: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Rea: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Etienne: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rousselot: Incyte, Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; Kartos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sun Pharma Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria.
Abstract Background: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a complement-mediated, hematologic disease characterized by hemolysis, anemia, and fatigue that impairs quality of life. Pegcetacoplan (PEG), a C3-inhibitor recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of PNH, controls intravascular hemolysis (IVH) and prevents extravascular hemolysis (EVH). The PADDOCK and PALOMINO trials demonstrated PEG's improvement of key hematologic and clinical parameters, including hemoglobin (Hb) level and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue score. The PEGASUS trial demonstrated that PEG was more effective than eculizumab (ECU) in improving these parameters in PNH patients with suboptimal response to prior ECU treatment. Aims: This post hoc analysis categorized hematologic response to PEG in 3 trials: PADDOCK (phase 1b, open-label, two-cohort [NCT02588833]), PALOMINO (phase 2a, open-label, single-cohort [NCT03593200]), and PEGASUS (phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-comparator controlled [NCT03500549]). Methods: PADDOCK and PALOMINO included adult complement inhibitor-naïve patients, while PEGASUS included adult patients with Hb <10.5 g/dL despite ≥3 months of ECU treatment. PADDOCK was a multiple ascending dose pilot study of 2 cohorts: cohort 1 received a suboptimal PEG dose (180 mg/day subcutaneously [SQ]) for 28 days; cohort 2 received a PEG dose of 270-360 mg/day SQ for up to one year. Patients could be enrolled in both cohorts. PALOMINO patients received a PEG dose of 270-360 mg/day SQ for up to one year. PEGASUS comprised a 4-week run-in period where patients received both ECU (continued dosing regimen) and PEG (1080 mg SQ twice-weekly), 16-week randomized controlled period (PEG or ECU monotherapy), and 32-week open-label period (PEG monotherapy) including a 4-week run-in period for the ECU-to-PEG group. Hematologic response category was assessed at Days 113/337 for patients in the combined PADDOCK/PALOMINO trials (N=24) via manual categorization by two independent, blinded observers. Categorization was assessed at Weeks 16/48 for PEGASUS patients (N=80) using SAS 9.4M5. Statistical significance for hematologic response categories within arms at Week 16 vs. 48, and between arms at Week 48, was evaluated using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Chi-square testing. FACIT-Fatigue scores for PEGASUS patients, summarized using descriptive statistics, were also correlated to hematologic response category. Response categories were defined per the following criteria (Risitano A, et al., Front Immunol, 2019;10:1157): complete- no transfusions required, stable Hb (normal range), no evidence of hemolysis (lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]≤1.5×upper limit of normal [ULN] U/L, absolute reticulocyte count [ARC]≤150,000/µL); major- no transfusion, normal Hb, but with evidence of hemolysis (LDH>1.5×ULN U/L and/or ARC>150,000/µL); good- no transfusions, but with chronic mild anemia or evidence of hemolysis; partial- chronic moderate anemia and/or occasional transfusions (<3 units/6 months); minor- regular transfusions required (3-6 units/6 months); no response- regular and frequent transfusions required (>6 units/6 months). PADDOCK/PALOMINO patients missing data at an assessment timepoint, or PEGASUS patients missing data within 6 weeks prior to an assessment timepoint, were not evaluated. Results: Most PADDOCK/PALOMINO patients achieved at least a good hematologic response at Days 113 and 337 (Table 1). At Week 48, most patients in both PEGASUS arms achieved a good/major/complete hematologic response (inter-arm p=0.4390), with a significant increase in the percent of ECU-to-PEG patients achieving at least a good response after switching to PEG at Week 16 (Week 16 vs. 48: intra-arm p<0.0001; Table 1). In PEGASUS, patients with better response categories had higher FACIT-Fatigue scores when compared to the rest of the cohort (Week 16: p<0.001, Week 48: p=0.028; Table 2). Conclusions: In post hoc analyses of PADDOCK, PALOMINO, and PEGASUS trial data, a substantial proportion of patients achieved and maintained good, major, or complete hematologic responses to PEG, suggesting that PEG can lead to sustained improvements in hematologic parameters. PEGASUS data also demonstrated correlation of improved hematologic response category with clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life, as measured by FACIT-Fatigue. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Risitano: Jazz: Other: Lecture fees, Speakers Bureau; Achillion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees; Biocryst: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; RA Pharma: Research Funding; Amyndas: Consultancy; Samsung: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Other: Lecture fees, Speakers Bureau; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees, Speakers Bureau. Wong: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Al-Adhami: Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Chen: Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Peffault De Latour: Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.
Abstract Fanconi anemia (FA), a genetic disorder affecting DNA repair, is characterized by bone marrow failure and cancer susceptibility. In FA mouse models, metformin (N,N-dimethylguanide) a biguanide metabolic agent, improves blood counts and delays tumor development. Given these findings, we conducted a single institution pilot study of metformin in non-diabetic patients with FA to assess feasibility, tolerability, and impact of metformin on hematologic response as defined by modified MDS International Working Group (IWG) criteria (Table 1). Fourteen of 15 patients with at least 1 cytopenia (hemoglobin <10g/dL, platelet count <100k/uL, or an ANC <1000 cells/uL) who signed treatment consent were eligible to receive metformin for 6 months; 1 patient was deemed ineligible given clonal disease progression on pretreatment bone marrow evaluation. Dosing of metformin was age based and equivalent to that used for type II diabetes mellitus. Of patients treated, the median patient age was 9.4 years (range 6.0-26.5), and 8/14 were male (57%). Median blood counts at study entry were hemoglobin of 11 g/dL (range 8.4 -14.2), platelet count of 54k/uL (range 16 -78), ANC of 1100 cells/uL (range 600 -1600). One patient was transfusion-dependent for red blood cells. Twelve of 14 patients (86%) completed 6 months of metformin treatment. One patient was lost to follow up after 2 weeks of metformin treatment and a second withdrew from the study after 3 months to proceed to hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Thirteen of 14 subjects (93%) tolerated maximal metformin daily dosing for age; one subject had a dose reduction for grade 2 gastrointestinal symptoms. No subjects developed hypoglycemia or metabolic acidosis. Three subjects had mildly elevated insulin levels consistent with mild insulin resistance prior to drug start; in 2/3 instances insulin levels normalized after metformin therapy. With metformin treatment, the most common adverse event observed was diarrhea (12/14, 85.7%); n=11 cases were grade 1 and n=1 was grade 2. Additional toxicities observed are outlined in Table 2. Hematologic response was observed in 4 of 13 evaluable patients (30.8%, 90% CI: [11.3, 57.3]) who received at least one month of treatment. The median time to response was 84.5 days (range 71-128 days). Responses were noted in neutrophils (n=3), platelets (n=1), and red blood cells (n=1). One individual with severe transfusion-dependent anemia became transfusion-independent after 1 month of treatment. The magnitude of hematologic improvement for the entire study cohort is outlined in Table 3. No subjects met criteria for disease progression or relapse during treatment. Bone marrow assessment of cellularity was not significantly different post therapy (median of change 0; interquartile range: -12.5- 30, p= 0.82) and clonal abnormalities noted at enrollment did not evolve with treatment. Interestingly, chromosomal breakage with MMC or DEB was observed to be lower following metformin in paired pre/post metformin samples from 8/10 and 7/10 individuals, respectively. Colony forming cell assays were performed pre/post metformin in 4 bone marrow samples derived from individuals who lacked protocol defined hematologic response. In 2 of 4 cases, increased myeloid and erythroid colony-forming cells were observed following metformin therapy. Exploratory proteomic assessment of plasma proteins pre and post metformin exposure identified downregulation of cytokine and cytokine receptor interaction pathways and inflammatory pathways and upregulation of insulin signaling pathways after completion of metformin. We conclude that metformin is safe and tolerable in non-diabetic patients with FA and may provide therapeutic benefit for a subset of patients with this marrow failure/cancer predisposition condition. Future efficacy endpoints should address the utility of metformin as both a prophylactic agent aimed at curtailing progression of bone marrow failure and as a preventive agent aimed at reducing cancer risk in FA. A phase II multicenter study is warranted to study whether the treatment is efficacious in a larger subset of patients and to further elucidate the signaling pathways and mechanism of action by which metformin may provide benefit in FA. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pollard: Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Furutani: Keros Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Esrick: bluebird bio: Consultancy. Nakano: Novartis: Consultancy. Thompson: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biomarin: Research Funding; Vertex: Research Funding; Graphite Bio: Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Beam Therapeutics: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. OffLabel Disclosure: metformin- use in Fanconi anemia in an effort to improve hematopoiesis
Abstract Background: Management of CML with TKIs is constrained by treatment resistance, which portends a poor prognosis particularly in pts failing 2 nd-generation TKIs. Cells with BCR-ABL1 T315I mutations are insensitive to 1 st- and 2 nd -generation TKIs, and compound BCR-ABL1 mutations complicate management with all TKIs (including 3 rd-generation ponatinib). Olverembatinib is a novel, potent, 3 rd-generation, orally active BCR-ABL1 TKI with promising activity against CML , largely irrespective of genotype and has a preliminary favorable safety profile. Methods: HQP1351-CC201 and HQP1351-CC202 are Chinese open, single-arm, multicenter phase 2 trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of olverembatinib in adults with TKI-resistant (BCR-ABL1 T351-mutated) CML-CP and CML-CP, respectively. Olverembatinib was administered at 40 mg orally on alternate days for 28-day cycles. The primary outcome measure is major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and major hematologic response (MaHR) by the end of Cycle 12 in CML-CP and CML-AP, respectively. Secondary study endpoints include : complete CyR (CCyR), complete hematologic response (CHR), major molecular response (MMR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety, including treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Results: Baseline characteristics Study CC201 （CML-CP ） On the study cutoff date of August 25,2020, 41 pts were enrolled, of whom 32 (78%) completed ≥ 12 cycles and 21 (51.2%) were male. The median (range) follow-up was 13 (3.1-16.3) months, age was 47 (22-70) years, and interval from CML diagnosis to first olverembatinib dose was 5.31 (0.6-23.2) years. In all, 32 (78.1%) pts had received ≥ 2 prior TKIs and 9 pts withdrew because of progressive disease (PD), intolerance, or consent withdrawal before Cycle 12. Study CC202 （CML-AP ） On the cut-off date of July 27, 2020, 23 pts were enrolled, of whom 14 (61%) had completed ≥ 12 cycles and 18 (78.3%) were male. The median (range) follow-up was 13.5 (1.4-15.2) months, age was 41 (21-74) years, and interval from CML diagnosis to first olverembatinib dose was 4.96 (0.4-10.2) years. In all, 18 (78.3%) pts had received ≥ 2 prior TKIs, and 11 pts withdrew because of PD or intolerance before Cycle 12. Efficacy Study CC201 （CML-CP ） After ≥ 12 treatment cycles in pts without responses at baseline, all 31 (100%) experienced CHR (10 other pts had CHR at baseline); 31/41 (75.6%) MCyR; 28/41 (68.3%) CCyR; and 23/41 (56.1%) MMR (Figure 1). The median time to CHR was 1 (95% CI = 1.0-1.9) month, the median time to MCyR was 2.8 (95% CI = 2.8-5.6) months, and the median time to MMR was 6.5 (95% CI = 2.8 to not reached [NR]) months. At 12 months, the PFS rate was 89.3% (95% CI = 73.9%-95.8%), and the OS was 100% (95% CI = 100%-100%). Study CC202 （CML-AP ） After ≥ 12 treatment cycles in pts without responses at baseline, 17/23 (73.9%) experienced MaHR (65.2% CHR and 8.7% no evidence of leukemia [NEL]); 12/23 (52.2%) MCyR; 11/23 (47.8%) CCyR; and 9/23 (39.1%) MMR (Figure 1). The median time to MaHR was 2.8 (95% CI = 1.0-4.7) months, the median time to MCyR was 5.6 (95% CI = 2.00-NR) months, and the median time to MMR was 13.1 (95% CI = 5.6-NR) months. At 12 months, the PFS rate was 74.1% (95% CI = 48.2%-88.4%), and the OS was 91.3% (95% CI = 69.5%-97.8%). Safety Study CC201 （CML-CP ） Frequent TRAEs (all grades; grade 3-4; SAEs) included thrombocytopenia (70.7%; 48.8%; 7.3%), followed by anemia (61%; 26.8%; 2.4%), leukopenia (43.9%; 17.1%; 0), and neutropenia (36.6%; 19.5%; 0). Common nonhematologic TRAEs (all grades; G3-4) included skin pigmentation (56.1%, 0%) and elevations in creatine kinase (51.2%, 14.6%), ALT (39%, 2.4%) and AST (34.1%, 0) (Table 1). No deaths occurred. Study CC202 （CML-AP ） Common TRAEs (all grades; G3-4; SAEs) included thrombocytopenia (73.9%; 56.5%; 17.4%), anemia (60.9%; 34.8%; 13.0%), leukopenia (56.5%; 30.4%; 0), and neutropenia (26.1%; 21.7%; 0). Common nonhematologic AEs included skin pigmentation (69.6%), hypocalcemia (52.2%), proteinuria (47.8%), hypertriglyceridemia (56.5%), hyperphosphatemia (47.8%), hyperuricemia (21.7%), and arthralgia (34.8%), of which most were grade 1-2 (Table 2). Conclusions: Olverembatinib was efficacious and well tolerated when administered as monotherapy in pts with TKI-resistant CP-CML and AP-CML and the BCR-ABL1 T315Imutation. Internal study identifiers: HQP1351-CC201-CC202. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03883087 and NCT03883100. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chen: Ascentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Niu: Ascentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Men: Ascentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yang: Ascentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Leadership and other ownership interests, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Zhai: Ascentage Pharma Group Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Leadership and other ownership interests, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Leadership and other ownership interests, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.
Abstract Background: Eculizumab, an anti-C5 antibody, was approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with symptomatic paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) in 2007 and has been the standard of care for over a decade. However, published data on real-world outcomes of eculizumab-treated pts with PNH are limited. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical profile of pts with PNH treated with eculizumab by characterizing their short- and long-term laboratory and clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study (Versmold et al, Blood 2020) used preexisting medical records of eculizumab-treated pts with PNH (treatment duration ≥24 weeks [wks]) treated at the University Hospital Essen, Germany prior to April 2018. Anonymized data were collected via electronic case report forms. Laboratory data were extracted from the hospital computer system. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), hemoglobin, absolute reticulocyte count (ARC), and bilirubin profiles were assessed at baseline (12 months before treatment) and during the treatment phase (up to 13.2 years [yrs] follow-up). Breakthrough hemolysis (BTH) was defined as ≥1 new symptom or sign of intravascular hemolysis (including fatigue, hemoglobinuria, abdominal pain, dyspnea, anemia [hemoglobin <10 g/dL], major adverse vascular event [including thrombosis], dysphagia, or erectile dysfunction in the presence of elevated LDH [≥2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN)] after reduction of LDH to ≤1.5 × ULN). Extravascular hemolysis was defined as persistence of reticulocytes >100 × 10 9/L with bilirubin >1 × ULN and positive direct Coombs test or reticulocytes >100 × 10 9/L with bilirubin >1 × ULN and ≥1 positive C3c or C3d test. Complete hematologic response was zero blood transfusions with hemoglobin ≥12 g/dL and LDH ≤1.5 × ULN and major hematologic response was zero blood transfusions with hemoglobin ≥12 g/dL and LDH >1.5 × ULN within any 24-wk window (Risitano et al, Front Immunol 2019). Transfusion-dependence was ≥2 blood transfusions within any 24-wk period. Pts transferred from other centers or within 24 wks of treatment were excluded due to missing baseline data. Results: The study included 56 pts with PNH (mean age: 42.9 yrs [± 17.6]; 46.4% female) treated with eculizumab for ≥24 wks (mean follow-up: 5.24 yrs [± 3.25]) during the study period. The median duration from diagnosis to starting eculizumab was 1.57 yrs. Overall, 18 pts (32.1%) had aplastic anemia at diagnosis, 10 (17.9%) had symptoms of high disease activity, and 34 (60.7%) had a blood transfusion in the prior 12 months. The most reported disease-related symptoms at baseline were anemia (28.6%), fatigue (26.8%), thrombosis (21.4%), dyspnea (17.9%), dysphagia (10.7%), erectile dysfunction (10.0%), kidney complications (8.9%), abdominal pain (8.9%), and hemoglobinuria (7.1%). Mean hemoglobin (n=44) was 9.67 g/dL [± 2.06] and LDH in the past 12 months (n=47) was 1480 U/L [± 1010]. During the first 24-wk treatment phase, 37% (20/54) of pts had LDH >1.5 × ULN, 31% (14/45) had ARC >1.5 × ULN, and 17% (8/47) had hemoglobin ≥12 g/dL (Figure). Among pts with response data, 15% (7/47) had complete hematologic response and 2% (1/47) had major hematologic response within 24 wks. Documented BTH with symptoms occurred in 11% (6/56). Moreover, 23% (13/56) of pts were transfusion-dependent, increasing to 39% (22/56) when including pts who had ≥1 transfusion during the first 24 wks of treatment. Six pts (11%) received a higher-than-labeled dose (600 mg intravenous [IV] weekly for 4 wks, 900 mg IV 1 wk later, then 900 mg IV every 2 wks thereafter) of eculizumab. Over the long term (ie, between 25 and 246 wks), 11.1-34.7% of pts received blood transfusions and 7.0-21.7% had LDH >1.5 × ULN in any 24-wk window; whereas 36.1-72.7% had ARC >1.5 × ULN (Figure). Moreover, 65.8-77.3% of pts had hemoglobin <12 g/dL within any 24-wk period and 69.0-77.2% did not meet the criteria for major or complete hematologic response during any 24-wk period from wks 25 to 246. During the treatment phase, no meningococcal infections were reported. Conclusions: In this long-term real-world study, a considerable proportion of pts with PNH treated with eculizumab did not achieve optimal clinical outcomes with an ongoing burden of disease (ie, low hemoglobin level with high reticulocyte count due to extravascular hemolysis, BTH, etc.). Future exploration of other therapies that improve pt outcomes could help to address remaining unmet medical needs. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Alashkar: Alexion: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria; Bluebird Bio: Honoraria. Ofori-Asenso: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Xu: F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG: Current Employment. Liu: Genesis Research: Current Employment. Katz: F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment. Shang: F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Roeth: Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bioverativ, a Sanofi company: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kira: Consultancy, Honoraria.
Abstract Background: There has been an increased use of novel agents in the induction therapy for transplant-eligible AL amyloidosis over past decade. Hematologic response after an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is predictive of better outcomes, including organ response and overall survival. However, limited data exist about the outcomes of patients who are refractory to induction chemotherapy but proceed with upfront ASCT). We present here the outcomes of AL amyloidosis refractory to induction therapy. Methods: This retrospective study included all consecutive AL patients who had their ASCT at our institution between 01/2008 and 12/2018 and received induction therapy. We excluded patients who were untreated at the time of transplant. Primary objective: assess the hematologic response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary objective: compare PFS and OS of AL amyloidosis by response to induction therapy (refractory vs sensitive). Refractory disease was defined as patient who had stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) after at least 1 line of induction therapy. Hematologic response was defined per the 2012 consensus criteria. Survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: One-hundred-and-eleven patients with a median age of 61 (range, 27-77) years met eligibility criteria. Thirty-three (30%) were refractory and 78 (70%) were sensitive to induction therapy. Table 1 summarizes patient and disease characteristics of all study patients and for the refractory vs sensitive groups. Overall, the two groups were comparable except for significantly more kidney involvement in the refractory group (97% of patients). Induction therapies were similar in the two groups, with bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone (VCD) being the most commonly used regimen (46%). With a median follow-up of 3.11 (range, 0.18-11.15) years, the 3-year PFS and OS for all study patients were 67% and 78%, respectively. At 3 months after transplant, 74% of the patients in the refractory group achieved an objective hematologic response (OHR; defined as PR or better). Of these, 29% achieved VGPR/CR and 45% achieved PR. As expected, more patients in the sensitive group achieved OHR (97%) and VGPR/CR (76%). The respective 3-year PFS and OS were 49% and 73% in the refractory group compared to 75% and 83% in the sensitive group (p=0.0068 for PFS; p=0.0790 for OS). Univariate analysis (UVA) was performed for the variables listed in Table 1 and multivariable analyses included only factors with p value<0.1 in in the UVA. In MVA, in addition to increased risk for refractory patients (HR 2.885, 95% CI:1.237-6.729; p=0.0142), only elevated beta-2 microglobulin (HR 3.899, 95% CI:1.039-14.629; p=0.0437) was associated with inferior PFS. Regarding OS, age ≥60 (HR 3.812, 95% CI:1.038-14.002; p=0.0438) and revised Mayo stage III/IV (HR 3.886, 95% CI: 1.029-14.679; p=0.0453) were associated with inferior survival. In a subgroup analysis comparing PFS and OS stratifying patients by their response to induction (refractory vs sensitive) and their 3-month hematologic response after transplant, we found no significant differences in the 3-year PFS (86% for refractory vs 80% for sensitive group; p=0.7284) for those with VGPR or better but significantly inferior PFS for refractory patients who achieved <VGPR (27% compared to 74% for the sensitive group; p=0.0196). Conclusion: AL amyloid patients refractory to induction therapy seem to benefit from high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT in terms of both response rates and survival. Durable responses for refractory disease are notable in patients who achieved >VGPR after ASCT. Prospective studies comparing transplant versus non-transplant approaches are warranted for these high-risk patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hosing: Nkarta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Popat: Bayer: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Lee: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Oncopetides: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding. Orlowski: Asylia Therapeutics, Inc., BioTheryX, Inc., and Heidelberg Pharma, AG.: Other: Laboratory research funding; Asylia Therapeutics, Inc.: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Patents & Royalties; Amgen, Inc., BioTheryX, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Forma Therapeutics, Genzyme, GSK Biologicals, Janssen Biotech, Juno Therapeutics, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc., Kite Pharma, Neoleukin Corporation, Oncopeptides AB, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, I: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, Exelixis, Janssen Biotech, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Other: Clinical research funding; Amgen, Inc., BioTheryX, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, EcoR1 Capital LLC, Genzyme, GSK Biologicals, Janssen Biotech, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc., Neoleukin Corporation, Oncopeptides AB, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis, and Takeda P: Consultancy, Honoraria. Qazilbash: Janssen: Research Funding; Biolline: Research Funding; Angiocrine: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; NexImmune: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Advisory Board; Oncopeptides: Other: Advisory Board.
