scholarly journals Real World Outcomes of Letermovir Prophylaxis in Unselected High Risk CMV Seropositive Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3269-3269
Author(s):  
Eva Karam ◽  
Justin LaPorte ◽  
Connie Sizemore ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
H. Kent Holland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Cmv Disease

Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a leading cause of morbidity following allogenenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Letermovir (LTV), an orally available antiviral drug which inhibits the CMV-terminase complex, was recently approved for CMV prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive HSCT recipients due to its ability to significantly reduce the risk of clinically significant CMV infection and its favorable toxicity profile. In the pivotal phase 3 study, subgroup analysis suggested increased benefit of LTV in patients at higher risk for CMV infection (i.e. unrelated or haploidentical donor (HID) vs. matched related donor), however HID transplants represented only 16% of the study population1. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of CMV reactivation rates, before and after the initiation of routine LTV prophylaxis, to determine the real-world safety and efficacy of LTV in an unselected group of CMV-seropositive high risk HSCT recipients, including a large number of HID transplants. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 106 consecutive CMV-seropositive high risk allogeneic HSCT recipients between 2017 and 2019. We compared the incidence of CMV infection immediately prior to the initiation of routine LTV prophylaxis in high risk transplant recipients (pre-LTV) (n=41) to that occurring after the initiation of LTV prophylaxis (post-LTV) (n=63). HSCT recipients were considered high risk if they had received at least one of the following: transplant from a haploidentical donor, matched unrelated donor, umbilical cord blood donor source or received anti-thymocyte globulin. CMV infection was defined as the need for pre-emptive therapy or documented CMV disease. The cumulative incidence (CI) of CMV infection at 100 days and 180 days were calculated to accommodate death as a competing risk. We used the Wald test to compare the CI at 100 and 180 days between the two cohorts. Results: Baseline characteristics of the pre- and post-LTV cohorts were similar, with HID transplants making up the majority of HSCTs in both groups, 65% and 64% respectively. We found a significantly lower CI of CMV infection at both 100 and 180 days in the post-LTV cohort when compared to the pre-LTV cohort (19.4% vs. 68.3% and 27.6% vs. 71% respectively; p<0.001) (Fig. 1). Despite lower CMV incidence following LTV prophylaxis, there was no significant difference in median time to CMV infection when compared to patients not receiving LTV prophylaxis (median [range] 40 [10, 243] vs. 36 [10, 180] days, p=0.72). The CI of CMV disease was 1.6% in the post-LTV cohort vs. 7.3% in the pre-LTV cohort (p=0.186). No significant differences were observed in any other outcome variable including overall survival, non-relapse mortality, relapse, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or time to neutrophil or platelet recovery. A preplanned subset analysis limited to HID transplant recipients (Fig. 2) again demonstrated a significant decrease in CMV infection in the post-LTV cohort at 100 and 180 days (27.9% vs. 80.8% and 34.6% vs. 84.6% respectively; p<0.001). Conclusion: This single center analysis confirms the benefit of LTV prophylaxis in reducing the risk of clinically significant CMV infection in unselected high risk CMV-seropositive HSCT patients, including a substantial number of HID transplant recipients. We found no significant impact of LTV prophylaxis on any other transplant outcome including hematologic engraftment, GVHD, relapse or mortality. In contrast to the pivotal phase 3 study, we saw few CMV infections occurring past day 100 after discontinuation of LTV prophylaxis. Future planned analyses will include comparisons of antiviral usage and associated toxicities (i.e. cytopenias), overall treatment charges and hospitalization/resource utilization. Disclosures LaPorte: Merck: Speakers Bureau.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) gB3 Genotype Is Associated with Acute Gvhd and CMV Disease in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1958-1958
Author(s):  
Débora de Campos Dieamant ◽  
Sandra Helena Alves Bonon ◽  
Francisco J P Aranha ◽  
Gislaine O. Duarte ◽  
Virginio C.O. Fernandes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Gastrointestinal Disease ◽  
Antiviral Treatment ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Cmv Disease

Abstract Abstract 1958 Based on sequence variation in the UL55 gene that encodes glycoprotein B (gB), human cytomegalovirus (CMV) can be classified into four gB genotypes. Previous studies have suggested an association between CMV gB genotype and clinical outcome in patients who underwent an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Objectives: The goals of this study were: identify patients with active infection caused by CMV in recipients of HSCT; determine the prevalence of CMV genotypes in the study group; correlate genotype with the CMV disease, acute GVHD and overall survival. Study design: The diagnosis of active CMV infection after allogeneic HSCT was detected by Antigenemia (AGM) and/or Nested-PCR (N-PCR). Positive samples from patients with active CMV infection were submitted to genotyping using the N-PCR to amplify a region of UL55, followed by restriction analysis based on HinfI and RsaI digestion. Real-time PCR (qPCR) was used to determine the viral load during active CMV infection and antiviral treatment. Results: Were evaluated 63 allogeneic HSCT recipients, 49/63 patients (78%) presented active CMV infection detected by AGM and/or N-PCR, in a median time of 38 days after the transplant. The distribution of CMV gB genotypes in these 49 patients with active CMV infection was as follow: gB1, 19/49 (38.8%); gB2, 17/49 (34.7%); gB3, 3/49 (6.1%); gB4, 7/49 (14.3%) and three patients (6.1%) had mixed infection with gB1+gB3, gB1+gB4 and gB2+gB4. Acute GVHD grade II-IV occurred in 17/49 (34.7%) patients: 8/19 (gB1-42%), 1/17 (gB2 - 5.9%), 4/4 (gB3 - 100%) and 4/9 (gB4 - 44.4%). The distribution of the frequency of acute GVHD grade II-IV between the genotypes was statistically different (p=0.008). CMV disease occurred in 3/49 (6.1%) patients, characterized for gastrointestinal disease and these three patients had infection with CMV gB3 genotype. This genotype of CMV was also associated with higher viral load during antiviral treatment and worse survival. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the frequency of active CMV infection in HSCT population was high (78%). The most prevalent genotype in patients with active CMV infection was gB1 and gB3 genotype was associated with acute GVHD grade II-IV, CMV gastrointestinal disease, higher viral load during antiviral treatment and worse survival. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Immune monitoring with iTAg MHC Tetramers for prediction of recurrent or persistent cytomegalovirus infection or disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a prospective multicenter study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (10) ◽  
pp. 1655-1662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan W. Gratama ◽  
Michael Boeckh ◽  
Ryotaro Nakamura ◽  
Jan J. Cornelissen ◽  
Rik A. Brooimans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Immune Monitoring ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Mhc Tetramers

Abstract Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients despite the introduction of posttransplantation viral monitoring and preemptive antiviral therapy. We evaluated the use of HLA class I tetramers in monitoring CMV-specific T-cell recovery to predict patients at risk for CMV-related complications. This prospective multicenter clinical trial obtained nearly 1400 tetramer/allele results in more than 800 biweekly blood samples from 83 patients monitored for 1 year after transplantation. Major HLA types were included (A*0101, A*0201, B*0702, B*0801, B*3501). iTAg MHC Tetramers (Beckman Coulter) were used to enumerate CMV-specific CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry using a single-platform absolute counting method. Assay variability was 8% or less and results were available within 3 hours. Delayed recovery of CMV-specific T cells (< 7 cells/μL in all blood samples during the first 65 days after transplantation) was found to be a significant risk factor for CMV-related complications; these patients were more likely to develop recurrent or persistent CMV infection (relative risk 2.6, CI 1.2-5.8, P = .01) than patients showing rapid recovery, which was associated with protection from CMV-related complications (P = .004). CMV tetramer–based immune monitoring, in conjunction with virologic monitoring, can be an important new tool to assess risk of CMV-related complications and to guide preemptive therapeutic choices.

scholarly journals Immunologic monitoring of cytomegalovirus (CMV) enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISPOT) for controlling clinically significant CMV infection in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0246191
Author(s):  
Euri Seo ◽  
Eun Seok Choi ◽  
Jung Hwa Kim ◽  
Hyery Kim ◽  
Kyung-Nam Koh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Full Recovery ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Immunologic Monitoring ◽  
Clinically Significant

The dynamics of recovery of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) and its impact on controlling clinically significant CMV infections following hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) are rarely reported in pediatric HSCT recipients. In this study, dynamics of recovery of CMV-specific CMI and its clinical significance in controlling CMV viremia and clinically significant CMV infections were assessed in pediatric allogeneic HSCT recipients. All subjects underwent CMV pp65- and IE1-specific enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISPOT) assays just before transplantation and then monthly until the detection of CMV-specific CMI with ≥ 5 spot-forming cells (SFC) / 2.0 × 105 cells. Clinically significant CMV infections were defined as CMV diseases, prolonged CMV infections, recurrent CMV infections or late onset CMV infections. Among 52 recipients, 88.5% of recipients recovered CMV-specific CMI with ≥ 5 SFC/ 2.0 × 105 cells at a median of 34 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 29–95 days) following HSCT, 55.8% at 30 days following HSCT, and 73.1% at 90 days following HSCT. The presence of CMV-specific CMI before HSCT was the significant factors for the reconstitution of CMV specific CMI after HSCT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 13.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.21–142.86). After HSCT, 30 recipients experienced CMV viremia, of which 20 were clinically significant CMV infections. The full recovery of CMV-specific CMI with ≥ 50 SFC / 2.0 × 105 cells after HSCT was the protective factor for the development of clinically significant CMV infections (aOR = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.22–0.71). In the haploidentical HSCT recipients, 82.1% recovered CMV-specific CMI at a median of 65 days after HSCT (IQR: 34–118 days) with a tendency to recover their CMV-specific CMI later than did those from non-haploidentical donors (65 days vs. 30 days; P = 0.001). Clinically significant CMV infections tended to occur more frequently in the haploidentical HSCT recipients compared to those with matched donor HSCT (46.4% vs. 29.2%; P = 0.205). The full recovery of CMV-specific CMI with ≥ 50 SFC/2.0 × 105 cells after HSCT also lowered the risk of development of clinically significant CMV infections (aOR = 0.08; 95% CI = 0.01–0.90). However, transplantation from haploidentical donors was a significant risk factor hampering recovery of CMV-specific CMI (aOR = 0.08; 95% CI = 0.01–0.86) and full recovery of CMV-specific CMI (aOR = 0.05; 95% CI = 0.01–0.50). Pre-transplant CMV-specific CMI influenced the recovery of CMV-specific CMI, and the full recovery of CMV-specific CMI could be a surrogate marker for preventing clinically significant CMV infections in pediatric HSCT recipients. Immunologic monitoring using ELISPOT assay before and after HSCT helps in identifying patients with a high risk of CMV infection and in controlling CMV infection.

scholarly journals 1102. Reconstitution of CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity during letermovir prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell recipients

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S581-S581
Author(s):  
Maheen Abidi ◽  
Jonathan Gutman ◽  
Adriana Weinberg
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cell Mediated Immunity ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Cmv Disease ◽  
Cmv Reactivation ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background Patients who are cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositive (R+) prior to hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), have 30% incidence of clinically significant CMV reactivation in the absence of prophylaxis. At our institution, letermovir prophylaxis through Day 100 is used in CMV R+ high-risk (HR) (cord blood, haplocord, haploidentical) HCT recipients. We hypothesized that clinically nonsignificant CMV reactivation during letermovir prophylaxis may lead to reconstitution of CMV specific cell mediated immunity (CMV CMI), which may protect the host against CMV disease after letermovir discontinuation. Methods Blood samples from CMV R+ HR HCT recipients on letermovir were tested by dual color CMV specific IL2/IFNg FLUOROSpot pre-transplant and on Days 100, 182 and 360 post-transplant. Clinical and virologic information were obtained from medical records. Results Among 35 participants enrolled to date, 19 were eligible for this analysis, which included only participants with CMV CMI defined as ≥20 spot-forming cells/106 PBMC pre-transplantation and follow up ≥180 post-transplantation. Median age was 51.5 years (range 22-75), 9 were women, 9 were white non-Hispanic, 8 were Hispanic and the most common underlying malignancy was acute myeloid leukemia (n=10). 14 participants had CMV CMI reconstitution at Day 100; including 5 with and 9 without low level CMV DNAemia, defined as &lt;5000 international units/ml in whole blood quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay, while on letermovir prophylaxis. Among the 14 participants, 11 remained free of clinically significant CMV reactivation for a median (range) of 260 (80; 260) days post-letermovir discontinuation, while 3 developed acute graft vs. host disease (aGvHD) followed by clinically significant CMV reactivation. 5 participants did not reconstitute CMV CMI at Day 100 and none of them had DNAemia while on letermovir. 1 of 5 participants without CMV CMI reconstitution or aGvHD developed CMV disease after letermovir discontinuation. Conclusion High-risk patient populations can reconstitute CMV CMI while on letermovir. Ongoing investigation will help establish predictive parameters for CMV CMI that may allow risk stratification for CMV monitoring and letermovir usage. Disclosures Maheen Abidi, MD, Merck (Research Grant or Support) Jonathan Gutman, MD, Merck (Research Grant or Support) Adriana Weinberg, MD, GSK (Grant/Research Support)merck (Grant/Research Support)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document