Peripheral Neuropathy in the Cassiopeia Study

Introduction Peripheral neuropathy (PNP) remains one of the most common adverse events during multiple myeloma (MM) treatment. The immunomodulatory agent thalidomide and proteasome inhibitor bortezomib are particularly prone to induce PNP (Dimopoulos MA et al., Leukemia., 2010). Both agents are part of standard treatment regimens for newly diagnosed transplant-eligible MM patients. PNP varies from mild symptoms to severe disability, depending on timely dose reduction or discontinuation of treatment. Currently, incidence or severity of PNP cannot be predicted. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to monitor incidence of PNP in different treatment combinations, and in order to identify risk factors for developing PNP. Aims To investigate the incidence of PNP in patients treated in the Cassiopeia trial, to evaluate the role of CD38 antibody (daratumumab) treatment in development of PNP, and to identify risk factors for the development of PNP. Methods We retrospectively analysed incidence of PNP grade 2 to 4, scored according to common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4 (CTCAE) in the Cassiopeia study, a phase III trial conducted by IFM/HOVON, investigating the efficacy of adding daratumumab to bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTD). 1074 newly diagnosed MM patients were randomised. Patients received 4 induction cycles and 2 post transplantation consolidation cycles of 28 days each. Cycles included subcutaneous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1,4,8,11), oral thalidomide (100 mg daily), dexamethasone (20-40 mg) and daratumumab intravenously (16 mg/kg and weekly during induction cycles 1 and 2 and once every two weeks during induction cycles 3,4 and consolidation). This trial was registered as ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02541383 and was supported by the French IFM and Dutch HOVON groups (Moreau et al., Lancet, 2019). Multivariate analysis was performed including sex, age, arm, body mass index (BMI), cytogenetics, ISS stage, country, diabetes mellitus (DM), creatinine clearance, liver function, ECOG, baseline PNP and disease characteristics. Results Baseline characteristics in dara-VTD and VTD arms were similar. Overall, 380/1074 (35%) patients developed grade ≥2 PNP and 102/1074 (9%) patients developed grade ≥3 PNP. Multivariate analysis indicated that the cumulative incidence of PNP grade ≥2 was significantly lower in the dara-VTD arm (33%) when compared to the VTD arm (38%) (hazard ratio (HR)=0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-0.91, P=0.004). Furthermore, risk factors associated with a higher cumulative incidence of PNP grade ≥2 included older age (HR=1.03; P=0.020), grade 1 PNP at baseline (HR= 2.75; P= 0.002) and higher BMI (HR=1.46, P=0.003 for BMI 25-30 to HR=2.02, P=0.004 for BMI > 35). Progression free survival (PFS) from the end of induction was similar (86% vs 80% at 2 years, HR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-1.33, P=0.32) for patients developing grade ≥2 PNP during induction (179 pts, 17%). An unexpected finding was the difference in cumulative incidence between countries participating in this trial: in the Netherlands 68/141 (49%) of patients developed grade ≥2 PNP, while in France this was 280/846 (33%) and in Belgium 31/87 (36%) (p<0.001). The protocol of the Cassiopeia trial included instructions of discontinuation and dose modification, when PNP grade ≥2 was observed. However, in a subset of patients reaching PNP grade ≥ 2 the (temporary) discontinuation or adjustment of dose as described in the treatment protocol had not been applied (respectively in 148/352 (42%) with PNP ≥ 2 and in 39/97 (40%) with PNP ≥3). Conclusions Despite bortezomib being administered subcutaneously and clear instructions on discontinuation and dose modification, we observed a clinically relevant incidence of grade ≥2 PNP (35%) and grade ≥3 PNP (9%) in patients treated in the Cassiopeia trial. Patients in the dara-VTD arm showed less grade ≥2 PNP, suggesting a possible positive effect of daratumumab. Risk factors for the development of grade ≥2 PNP included older age, PNP at baseline and BMI > 25. Differences in incidence between countries were observed, however no clear explanation was found. Furthermore, standard measures for grading PNP, such as CTCAE criteria, are subject to interpretation bias of both the patient and the treating physician. Continuous screening and correct grading of PNP and strict compliance with guidelines is warranted. Disclosures Moreau: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Vermeulen:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Broyl:Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen: Honoraria. Sonneveld:Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Skyline Dx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Late-Onset Hemorrhagic Cystitis in Children After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) for Thalassemia and Sickle Cell Anemia: A Prospective Evaluation of Polyoma (BK) Virus Infection and Treatment with Cidofovir (CDV).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1133.1133 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1133-1133

Author(s):

Javid Gaziev ◽

Guido Lucarelli ◽

Stefano Germani ◽

Pierpaolo Paba ◽

Carlo Federico Perno ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Clinical Response ◽

Median Duration ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Late Onset ◽

Hemorrhagic Cystitis ◽

Bk Virus ◽

Spontaneous Resolution ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1133 Poster Board I-155 Background Hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) is a significant cause of morbidity after allogeneic HSCT. BK virus infection has been associated with development of HC after HSCT, however most studies detected the virus at the time of cystitis, therefore not allowing estimation of the relationship between BK reactivation and HC. Furthermore little is known about development of late-onset HC in children following HSCT, its association with BK virus and treatment with Cidofovir. Therefore we prospectively investigated BK virus reactivation in pts receiving HSCT from HLA-identical related donors, risk factors for development of HC and treatment efficacy with CDV. Patients and Methods 117 pts with thalassemia (n=107) and sickle cell anemia (n=10) with median age of 9 years (range, 1.7-17) were enrolled in this study. All pts received BUCY ± Thiotepa containing conditioning regimens. GVHD prophylaxis was cyclosporine and short MTX ± Thymoglobulin-ATG (in 26 pts). Before August 2006 qualitative BK-PCR was performed on urine samples in pts with HC. Since then we prospectively performed qualitative and quantitative PCR on blood and urine samples collected before conditioning regimen and weekly thereafter until at least 100 days post transplant in 64 pts. The quantitative BK virus assay was performed with Real Time Alert Q-PCR-Nanogen kit. Risk factors for the development of HC were evaluated on univariate and multivariate analysis using cumulative incidence curves and Competing risk regression analysis respectively. The cumulative incidence of HC was estimated considering death without HC as competing event. Nineteen pts with HC were given CDV at 1.5 mg/kg/day 3 times/week (n= 10) or 5 mg/kg/week (n=9). Results 60 out of 64 pts (94%) had at least 1 positive and 52 of them (81%) 2 or more positive samples for BK viruria. 34 pts (53%) showed al least 1 and 18 of them (28%) 2 or more positive samples for BK viremia. The number of viral copies varied from <556 to >55 million copies. Median time to platelet engraftment was 23 days (range,8-163) and median number of platelets at onset of HC was 81×109/l (range, 2-274 ×109/l). Thirty pts (26%) developed clinically significant (grade 2 to 4) HC within 1 year after HSCT at a median of 38 days (range, 13- 114). All pts with HC had BK viruria. Coexisting viral infections were found in 3 pts: CMV in 2 and adenovirus in 1. The severity of HC was grade 2 in 24 pts, grade 3 in 2 and grade 4 in 4. The 4 pts with grade 4 HC had moderate or severe hydronephrosis along with partial ureteral obstruction which necessitated ureteral stent placement. The cumulative incidence of grade 2 or 3-4 HC was 21%(95% CI 13%-28%) and 5%(95%CI 2%-10%) respectively. In univariate analysis the use of ATG, peak BK viruria, GVHD and age >8 years were associated with HC. Multivariate analysis confirmed the prognostic importance of ATG (HR=10.5; p=0.001), peak BK viruria >100,000 copies (HR=6.2; p=0.004), and acute GVHD (HR=5.3; p=0.007), but not age for HC development. The cumulative incidence of HC in pts who had 2 adverse factors was 64%, compared with 31% (or 53%) and 10 % who had either one (GVHD or ATG) or none of these factors (p<0.0001). However, there were 10 pts who had at 2 or more time points BK viruria >6 millions copies without developing HC. With a median follow-up among survivors of 35 months (range, 5-61) HC did not have a significant impact on survival. Both dosing schedules of CDV were well tolerated and no cases of dose-limiting nephrotoxicity were observed. The median duration of HC was 17 days (range 9-53). The median duration of therapy was 27 days (range,21-180) with a median of 9 doses given (range,6-22). All pts had clinical response but only 6 pts (32%) had microbiological response at 2 weeks after therapy. None of these patients cleared BK viruria when a complete clinical response was achieved. The median time from clinical response to BK viruria clearance was 74 days (range, 14-176). Ten pts with grade 2 and one with grade 3 HC occurred before prospective trial of CDV had spontaneous resolution of HC. The median duration of HC in these pts was similar to those treated with CDV. Conclusion BK viruria is common after HSCT and high viral load is a risk factor for HC. However, even higher-level BK replication alone is not sufficient to cause HC. Coexisting factors such as the use of ATG and GVHD significantly contribute to the development of HC. Cidofovir may have some activity against BK virus-related HC, although our data showed that spontaneous resolution of HC could also occur. Disclosure No relevant conflicts of interest to declare Disclosures Off Label Use: Cidofovir as antiviral drug for treatment of BK virus-related hemorrhagic cystitis.

Download Full-text

Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Modified Bortezomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasonelite (modified RVD-lite) Therapy for Transplant Eligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112294 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1961-1961

Author(s):

Kiyoshi Okazuka ◽

Tadao Ishida ◽

Junichiro Nashimoto ◽

Takao Yogo ◽

Kanji Miyazaki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Staging System ◽

Median Number ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Fish Analysis ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Grade 3

Abstract [Background] Thecombination therapy consisting of bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RVD) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma has been one of the standard induction therapies in recent years. However, 9-23 % of patients discontinued treatments because of severe adverse events in the previous reports (SWOG S077, IFM2009). Thus, it has not been clarified ifthe dosing schedule of RVD is appropriate. Here, we investigated the efficacy and safety of modified RVD-lite for 45 transplant eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). [Patients and methods] We retrospectively analyzed 45 transplant eligible patients with NDMM who received modified RVD-lite for induction therapy between February 2016 and March 2018. The median age was 58 years old (range 36~66), and 6 (13.3%) patients were AL amyloidosisassociated with multiple myeloma. Patients received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2once weekly subcutaneous (SC) on days 1, 8, 15, 22, lenalidomide 15 mg/day on days 2-7, 9-14, 16-21 and dexamethasone 40mg on days 1, 8, 15, 22. The Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) wereI in 13 (28.9%), II in 30 (66.7%) and III in 2 (4.4%). High-risk cytogenetics, defined as the presence of deletion 17, t(4;14) and t(14;16) by FISH analysis, were identified in 5 (11.1%) patients. After 4 cycles of modifiedVRd-lite, we evaluated the efficacy and adverse events. [Results] The overall response rate (ORR) after four 28-day cycles of modifiedRVD-lite was obtained in 41 (91.1%), including sCR in 6 (13.3%) and CR in 5 (11.1%). SD and PD were observed in 2 patients (4.4%) and 1 patient (2.2%), respectively. One patient was not evaluated efficacy, because a patient changed modifiedRVD-lite to ixazomib, lenalidomideand dexamethasone therapy for grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. Thirty-eight of 45 patients (84.4%) received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after at least 4 courses of modifiedVRd-lite. The median number of CD34+cells/kg collected was 4.83 x 106(range, 1.1-11.9). All patients received melphalan at doses of 200 mg/m2. In these patients, response after ASCT were sCR in 15(41.7%), CR in 2 (5.6%), VGPR in 8 (22.2%) and PR in 8 (22.2%). Three of seven patients who did not received ASCT will receive ASCT ina few months. Among other 4 patients who did not receive ASCT, 2 patients chose other therapies without ASCT, and 2 patients could not receiveASCT because they showed no improvement in cardiac AL amyloidosis. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were observed in 17 (37.8%). Most frequent grade 3 or higher AE was neutropenia (grade 3:17.8%, grade 4:6.7%). Only one patient (2.2 %) discontinued modifiedRVD-lite because of grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. [Conclusions] The ORR after 4 cycles ofmodifiedRVD-lite was high (91.1%). These results might be related to low rate of discontinuation of treatment. Also, the ORR after ASCT was comparable to the results previously published (N Engl J Med .2017 Apr 6:376(14):1311). AEs in modified RVD-lite were feasible and manageable in most patients. Our results suggest that modifiedRVD-lite is very feasible and effective treatment for patients with transplant eligible NDMM. Disclosures Suzuki: Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ono: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; SRL.Inc: Employment.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Cardiac, Vascular, and Hypertension Safety of Bosutinib (BOS) Versus Imatinib (IMA) for Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML): Results from the Bfore Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-134912 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 34-35

Author(s):

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Philipp D le Coutre ◽

Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽

Henrik Hjorth-Hansen ◽

Pia Raanani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Research Funding ◽

Study Drug ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Cardiac Events ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Vascular Events ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

History Of

Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy has been associated with cardiovascular (CV) events. BOS is approved for patients (pts) with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic phase (CP) CML and Ph+ CML resistant/intolerant to prior therapy. We analyzed cardiac, vascular and hypertension treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in pts with newly diagnosed CP CML receiving BOS or IMA after 5 yrs follow-up in BFORE. Methods: In the open-label, phase 3 BFORE trial (NCT02130557), 536 pts with newly diagnosed CP CML were randomized 1:1 to receive first-line 400 mg once-daily BOS (n=268) or IMA (n=268; 3 untreated). The current analysis included all pts who received ≥1 dose of study drug. TEAEs were monitored from first dose of study drug until 28 d after last dose; monitoring of non-serious adverse events (AE) ended at the start of a new cancer treatment. Prespecified MedDRA terms (cardiac, n=133; vascular, n=502) comprised clusters of investigator-assessed TEAEs (Table). Multivariable proportional subdistribution hazard models predicting time to first TEAE included treatment group; baseline demographic information; history of cardiac events, vascular events, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and tobacco use; as well as hypertension, cardiac (for vascular model) and vascular (for cardiac model) TEAEs. CI excluding 1 was considered predictive of outcome. This analysis was based on 17-Apr-20 last pt last visit (12-Jun-20 database lock), 5 y (240 wks) after last enrolled pt. Results: At study completion, 59.7% of BOS pts and 58.1% of IMA pts were still on treatment. Median duration of treatment was 55 mo for pts receiving BOS or IMA; respective median (range) dose intensity was 393.6 (39-583) vs 400.0 (189-765) mg/d. In the BOS vs IMA arm, 57.8% vs 56.2% of pts had ≥1 CV risk factor at baseline; 20.9% vs 17.7% had ≥3 risk factors, respectively. The most common risk factors were a history of hypertension (BOS, 34.0%; IMA, 30.6%), BMI >30 (BOS, 23.1%; IMA, 21.9%), age ≥65 y (BOS, 19.8%; IMA, 17.4%), and history of hyperlipidemia (BOS, 16.8%; IMA, 18.9%). Rates of cardiac, vascular and hypertension TEAEs; serious adverse events (AEs); AEs leading to treatment withdrawal and drug-related TEAEs (per investigator) were low in both arms (Table). Exposure-adjusted rates of cardiac, vascular and hypertension TEAEs were similar between arms (Table). Risk factors for cardiac TEAEs (HR; 95% CI) were age in years (1.04 [1.02-1.07]), race other than Asian or black compared to white (<0.01 [<0.01-<0.01]), a history of tobacco use (6.94 [1.89-25.40]) and cardiac events (3.59 [1.68-7.65]), hypertension (3.07 [1.20-7.84]) and vascular TEAEs (5.27 [1.53-18.18]). Risk factors for vascular TEAEs (HR [95% CI]) were black race compared to white (<0.01 [<0.01-<0.01]), a history of vascular events (4.65 [1.81-11.97]) and cardiac TEAEs (7.73 [2.31-25.84]). In multivariable analyses, treatment group was not predictive of time to initial cardiac (HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.45-1.70]) or vascular (HR 2.17 [95% CI 0.94-45.04) TEAEs. The most common cardiac, vascular, and hypertension TEAEs, respectively, were sinus bradycardia (2.2%), angina pectoris (3.0%) and hypertension (9.7%) with BOS vs electrocardiogram QT prolongation (3.8%), peripheral coldness (1.1%) and hypertension (10.9%) with IMA. One grade 5 cardiac (acute cardiac failure) and one vascular (myocardial ischemia) TEAE were reported with BOS, and one vascular (cerebrovascular accident) TEAE with IMA; none were considered related to study drug. Successful treatment rechallenge was achieved in the majority of pts with dose interruptions due to cardiac (BOS, 85.7%; IMA, 100%) and vascular (BOS, 100%; IMA, not applicable) TEAEs who were readministered study drug. No pts had dose interruptions due to hypertension TEAEs. Cardiac, vascular and hypertension TEAEs resolved in 57.7%, 75.0% and 35.7% of pts receiving BOS and 65.2%, 66.7% and 48.3% receiving IMA. Conclusions: In this final analysis of BFORE, the incidence of cardiac, vascular, and hypertension TEAEs in pts with newly diagnosed CP CML receiving BOS or IMA was low and was similar between treatment groups. These AEs infrequently led to treatment discontinuation. In addition to continued improved efficacy with BOS vs IMA after 5 yrs follow-up (Brümmendorf et al., ASH 2020), these safety results support the use of first-line BOS as a standard of care in pts with CP CML. Disclosures Cortes: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; BiolineRx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioPath Holdings: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Telios: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Sun Pharma: Research Funding; Merus: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding. le Coutre:Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Gambacorti-Passerini:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hjorth-Hansen:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Austrian Orphan Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Garcia-Gutiérrez:Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses, Research Funding. Kota:Ariad: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Xcenda: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical, Company Ltd, Cambridge, MA, USA: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Purcell:Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Viqueira:Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Leip:Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Brümmendorf:Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Nilotinib in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph)-Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Early Chronic Phase (CML-CP).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.341.341 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 341-341 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Jorge Cortes ◽

Susan O'Brien ◽

Dan Jones ◽

Elias Jabbour ◽

Marina Konopleva ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Research Funding ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Blast Phase ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 341 Background: Nilotinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor with increased selectivity against Bcr-Abl and approximately 30-fold more potent than imatinib, is effective in CML after imatinib failure. We initiated a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of nilotinib as 1st line therapy in pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Aims: To investigate the efficacy and safety of nilotinib as first-line therapy for pts with CML-CP. Methods: The primary objective was to estimate the proportion of pts attaining major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months (mo). Pts with untreated CML-CP within 6 mo from diagnosis were eligible and received nilotinib 400 mg twice daily. A cohort of patients with previously untreated CML in accelerated phase (AP) was also included. Results: Sixty-five pts (61 CP, 4 AP) have been treated for a median of 17 mo (range 1 to 43). The median age was 46 years (range 19 to 86). Among 48 pts who were not in CHR at the start, 47 (98%) achieved CHR (one discontinued after 2 weeks without adverse events). Among 51 pts followed for at least 3 mo, 50 (98%) achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). MMR has been achieved in 32 (63%) pts, including 12 (24%) with a complete molecular response. The rate of CCyR at different time points (intention-to-treat) for pts in CP compares favorably to that observed in historical controls treated with imatinib 400 mg or 800 mg daily: MMR was achieved by 55% at 12 mo and 53% at 24 mo (corresponding rates with imatinib 400 mg 34 and 55%, and with imatinib 800 mg 58% and 66%, respectively). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity (transient) included thrombocytopenia 11%, neutropenia 12%, and anemia 5%. Grade 3-4 non-hematologic adverse events (regardless of causality) included elevation of bilirubin in 8% and lipase in 6%, and non-neutropenic fever in 6%. 24 (37%) pts had transient treatment interruptions and 11 (17%) had dose reductions. The actual median dose is 800 mg daily. Ten pts have discontinued therapy: 4 pts for toxicity, 2 because of transformation to accelerated or blast phase, and 4 for other reasons. 24 mo EFS (event = loss of CHR, loss of MCyR, AP/BP, death, or off because of toxicity) is 90%. All patients are alive. Among pts in AP, 3 achieved CCyR (all of them sustained); one patient progressed to blast phase and died. Conclusion: Nilotinib 400 mg twice daily induces a CCyR in nearly all patients as early as 3 mo after the start of therapy and MMR in more than 50% at 12 months with a favorable toxicity profile. Disclosures: Cortes: BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Presentation will include use of nilotinib as initial therapy for CML, and indication for which nilotinib is not approved.. O'Brien:Novartis: Research Funding. Jones:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Jabbour:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Borthakur:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding; MGI Pharma (Eisai): Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I/II Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy with Lenalidomide/Bortezomib/Dexamethasone (RVD) and Panobinostat in Transplant-Eligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.187.187 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 187-187 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Jatin J. Shah ◽

Lei Feng ◽

Elisabet E. Manasanch ◽

Donna Weber ◽

Sheeba K Thomas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Depth Of Response ◽

High Risk Disease ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Induction therapy prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) continues to improve with the use of multi-drug combination regimens. Panobinostat (pano), a deacetylase inhibitor, was recently approved in combination with bortezomib/dexamethasone for relapsed myeloma based on the phase III PANORMA I trial for RRMM. The addition of pano in PANORAMA demonstrated a near doubling in CR rate from 15 to 27%. We previously reported phase I trial data of RVD + pano in newly diagnosed myeloma (NDMM) and demonstrated the pano can be safely combined with RVD. Based on the encouraging preliminary data we pursued a phase II dose expansion to further explore the potential improvement in depth of response with RVD + pano in NDMM. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the safety/tolerability of pano and RVD in NDMM. Secondary objectives were to determine efficacy as measured by the CR/nCR rate after 4 cycles, ORR, tolerability/toxicity, and progression free survival. Patients had to have NDMM with indication for therapy and be eligible for ASCT with adequate organ function. Panobinostat 10 mg was administered on days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12; bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 was administered subcutaneously on days 1, 4, 8, 11; lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1-14; dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 on a 21 day cycle. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4 and responses were assessed by the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results: 42 patients (pts) were enrolled; 12 in the dose escalation and 30 in the dose expansion. The median age was 60 (range 44-79); male (n=30); ISS stage I (n=28); ISS stage II (n=10); ISS stage III (n=4); 14/42 pts had high risk myeloma (1 pt with t(4:14) and del17p; 1 pt with del 17p and 1q21; and 12 pts with only 1q21 amplification). Among 42 pts, 2 completed only 1-2 cycles and 1 pt was inevaluable for response. Among the 39 pts who completed 4 cycles and were evaluable for efficacy the ORR (≥PR) after 4 cycles was 93% (36/39) including nCR/CR in 17/39 (44%), VGPR in 10/39 (26%), PR in 9/39 (23%), and SD in 3/39 (8%) pts. In 12 of 14 pts with high risk disease, who were evaluable for response, the ORR was 100% (12/12); the nCR/CR in 6/12 pts; VGPR in 4/12 pts; and 2/12 pts achieved a PR. 25/42 (59%) pts completed induction therapy and underwent consolidation with ASCT; 5 pts completed induction therapy, came off study and did not proceed to ASCT. 8 pts choose a delayed transplant approach, completed induction therapy and stem cell collection. 6 of those 8 pts remain on trial with maintenance therapy (len/dex/pano) per protocol. 2 pts, neither with high risk disease, progressed after cycles 10 and 11 with extramedullary disease and plasma cell leukemia/central nervous system involvement, respectively. 4 additional patients have completed 2, 3, and 5 cycles of therapy and are pending ASCT. Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events included anemia (5); neutropenia (10); thrombocytopenia (16). Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicities included ALT elevation (1); AST elevation (1); constipation (2); diarrhea (4); dyspnea (2); fatigue/muscle weakness (5); syncope (2); MI (1); nausea (3); peripheral neuropathy (2); rash (1); DVT/VTE (3). Infectious complications included grade 2 (G2) urinary tract infection (2); G2 upper respiratory tract infection (5); pneumonia (5); osteomyelitis/musculoskeletal (3); infection (3). Treatment emergent serious adverse events related to therapy observed were: G3 pneumonia (9); G2 fever (5), G3-4 venous thromboembolic events (2); G3 diarrhea (2); atrial fibrillation (2). Other events included 1 pt each with G3 cellulitis, G3 myocardial infarction (MI), G3 febrile neutropenia, G2 diarrhea, G2 seizure, G3 hypotension and G3 sinusitis. 1 pt had a second primary malignancy - a newly diagnosed breast cancer during cycle 9 of therapy. Conclusions: Panobinostat 10 mg can be safely combined with full dose RVD in NDMM. The side effect profile with use of subcutaneous bortezomib demonstrated minimal gastrointestinal toxicity/diarrhea and was a well-tolerated combination. The combination of RVD+ pano lead to rapid disease control with high response rate after 4 cycles of therapy and ORR of 93% and significant depth of response with a 4 cycle nCR/CR rate of 44%. Enrollment in dose expansion is near completion and full data will be presented at ASH and supports the study of panobinostat in a randomized trial for NDMM. Disclosures Shah: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Thomas:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Orlowski:Genentech: Consultancy; Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioTheryX, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Bosutinib Vs Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in the BFORE Trial: 18 Month Follow-up

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v130.suppl_1.896.896 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽

pp. 896-896

Author(s):

Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽

Michael W. Deininger ◽

Michael J. Mauro ◽

Charles Chuah ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Bosutinib is a potent SRC/ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of adults with CML resistant or intolerant to prior therapy. Here we compare the efficacy and safety of first-line bosutinib versus imatinib in patients with chronic phase (CP) CML enrolled in BFORE after ≥18 months of follow-up. Methods: BFORE (NCT02130557) is an ongoing, multinational, open label phase 3 study that randomized 536 patients 1:1 to 400 mg QD bosutinib (n=268) or 400 mg QD imatinib (n=268 [3 not treated]). The prespecified primary endpoint was major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, defined as Philadelphia chromosome‒positive (Ph+) patients with e13a2/e14a2 transcripts, and excluding Ph- patients and those with unknown Ph status and/or BCR-ABL transcript type (mITT: BOS, n=246; IM, n=241). Efficacy results refer to the mITT population unless otherwise noted. Results: MMR rate was higher with bosutinib versus imatinib at 18 months (56.9% vs 47.7%; P=0.042). Among all randomized patients (ITT) 18-month MMR rates were higher for bosutinib (56.7% vs 46.6%; P <0.02). Earlier analyses (Table) showed complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate by 12 months (77.2% vs 66.4%; P=0.0075) was significantly higher with bosutinib versus imatinib. Rates of BCR-ABL1 transcript ratio ≤10% (International Scale) at 3 months (75.2% vs 57.3%), as well as MR4 at 12 months (20.7% vs 12.0%) and MR4.5 at 12 months (8.1% vs 3.3%), were all higher with bosutinib versus imatinib (all P <0.025). By comparison at 18 months, rates of MR4 (24.4% vs 18.3%) and MR4.5 (11.4% vs 7.1%) were consistent with this trend. Also after ≥18 months follow-up, time to MMR (hazard ratio=1.36, based on cumulative incidence; P=0.0079) and time to CCyR (hazard ratio=1.33; P=0.0049) were shorter for bosutinib (Figure). Cumulative incidence of transformation to accelerated/blast phase disease at 18 months was 2.0% and 2.9% for bosutinb and imatinib, respectively, of which 2 bosutinib and 4 imatinib patients discontinued treatment due to transformation. Additional treatment discontinuations due to suboptimal response/treatment failure occurred in 11 (4.1%) and 35 (13.2%) of bosutinib and imatinib patients, respectively. Dose increases happened in 20% of bosutinib-treated and 31% of imatinib-treated pts There were 2 deaths and 9 deaths in the bosutinib and imatinib arms, respectively. One patient taking bosutinib died within 28 days of last dose, while 4 patients taking imatinib died with that period from last dose. Overall survival at 18 months was 99.6% vs. 96.6% for bosutinib and imatinib groups, respectively. Grade ≥3 diarrhea (8.2% vs 0.8%) and increased alanine (20.9% vs 1.5%) and aspartate (10.1% vs 1.9%) aminotransferase levels were more frequent with bosutinib. Cardiovascular, peripheral vascular, and cerebrovascular events were infrequent in both arms (3.4%, 1.9%, and 0.4% bosutinib vs 0.0%, 1.1%, and 0.8% imatinib; grade ≥3: 1.5%, 0%, and 0.4% vs 0%, 0%, and 0.4%). There were no deaths in the bosutinib arm and 1 death in the imatinib arm due to treatment-emergent vascular events. Treatment discontinuations due to drug-related toxicity occurred in 15.3% and 9.4% of bosutinib and imatinib patients, respectively. Conclusion: After 18 months of follow-up,the MMR benefit seen with bosutinib over imatinib was sustained. These results are in line with observations at 12 months where patients taking bosutinib had significantly higher response rates (primary endpoint) and achieved responses sooner than those on imatinib. Safety data were consistent with the known safety profiles. These results suggest that bosutinib may be an important treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed CP CML. Disclosures Gambacorti-Passerini: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Deininger: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy; Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI BioPharma Corp, Gilead, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer, Celgene, Blue Print, Galena: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy. Mauro: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Chuah: Avillion: Honoraria; Chiltern: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Travel; Novartis: Honoraria. Kim: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Il-Yang: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Milojkovic: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria. le Coutre: BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria. García Gutiérrez: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Crescenzo: Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leip: Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bardy-Bouxin: Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hochhaus: Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Brümmendorf: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Cortes: Sun Pharma: Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Randomized Comparison of Rituximab Versus Bortezomib Plus Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130133 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4003-4003

Author(s):

Shuhua Yi ◽

Wenjie Xiong ◽

Yi Wang ◽

Rui Lv ◽

Li Zengjun ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Event ◽

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Response Rate ◽

Routine Practice ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Minor Response ◽

Overall Response ◽

Good Response Rate ◽

Grade 3

Background:Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is one type of lymphoma that had the characteristic of both lymphocytes and plasma cells. Rituximab-based or bortezomib-based regiments are commonly used treatment approaches in routine practice in previously untreated patients with LPL/WM. However, which regiment is better still unknown. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of RCD (Rituximab,cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone) and BCD (Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone)in newly diagnosed WM patients. Methods:30 newly diagnosed WM patients were randomly assigned to BCD or RCD group for introduction chemotherapy. Chemotherapeutic response was evaluated after 3 cycles. If a minor response (MR) or better response achieves, addition 3 cycles will be given. If not, patients will be crossed to control group for another 3 cycles. If a MR or better response comes out, addition 3 cycles will be given, otherwise, the patients will quit this study. Results: Finally, 15 patients were assigned to each treatment group. The basic characteristics of the two groups were similar. The median time to response in RCD and BCD group were 4 months and 3 months, respectively. The CR rate in RCD and BCD group was 20% and 26.7% respectively, with VGPR rate 26.7% and 6.7%, PR rate 46.7% and 40% in each group respectively. Additional 20% minor response was observed in BCD group. The overall response was 86.7% in both groups. However, RCD group had higher good response rate (≥VGPR) compared to BCD ( 46.7% vs 33.4%, p=0.05). The rate of major response (≥PR) in RCD group was higher than that in BCD group (86.7% vs 66.7%, p=0.195). The median follow-up time was 29 months. The median duration of response in RCD and BCD group was 35 months and 30 months, respectively. The 3-year progression-free rate of RCD group was significantly higher than that of the BCD group (87.5% vs 39.2%,p=0.045). The 3-year overall survival rate was 100% with RCD group versus 70% with BCD group (100% vs 70%, p=0.127)The most common adverse events of any grade with RCD and BCD were hematological toxicity. 3 patients in the RCD group had grade 3 or higher granulocytopenia.4 patients in the BCD group occurred grade 3 or higher hypocytosis. Other adverse event in the RCD group included pneumonia (40%), non-infectious fever (26.7%), hyperglycemia (13.3%) and rash (6.7%).The most common non-hematological adverse event in BCD group were peripheral neuropathy (40%), pneumonia (26.7%), herpes zoster (13.3%) and ventosity(6.7%). Events of non-infectious fever occurred more frequently in the RCD group (26.7% vs 0%, p=0.032). However, peripheral neuropathy was more common in the BCD group (40% vs 6.7%, p=0.031). There was no serious non-hematological grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in the both groups. Conclusion: The RCD and BCD regimens have similar overall response in newly diagnosed WM. RCD regimen has higher good response rate and longer PFS time compared to BCD regimen. Both regimens have good tolerance. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Single Agent Bortezomib Is Associated with a High Response Rate in Patients with High Risk Myeloma. A Phase II Study from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2A02).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.3527.3527 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 3527-3527 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Lijung Zhang ◽

Rafael Fonseca ◽

David H. Vesole ◽

Philip R. Greipp

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

High Risk ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Response Rate ◽

Single Agent ◽

Novel Therapies ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Monoclonal Protein ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: MM is an incurable disease with an anticipated overall survival ranging from months to decades. Novel therapies like bortezomib have activity in both the relapsed/refractory and up front settings. There are sparse data on whether novel therapies may overcome high risk features. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed high-risk myeloma (beta-2 microglobulin [B2M] >= 5.5., plasma cell labeling index [PCLI] >= 1, or deletion 13q) were eligible. Patients were treated with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 day 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days for 8 cycles as induction. After induction, patients received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every other week indefinitely. Patients relapsing on maintenance schedule resumed full induction schedule. Responses were defined by the EBMT criteria. The primary end-point was the response rate (90% power to detect a response rate of >=50% ). Results: Between March 15, 2004 and March 10, 2005, 44 patients enrolled. Among the 43 eligible patients, median age was 63; 51% were male. All had high risk disease: deletion 13q (6/41); PCLI >=1% (17/33); t(4:14) (4/27) and B2M >= 5.5 (34/43). Response data are available for 37 of the 43 eligible patients. The overall response rate was 49% (95% CI: 0.32, 0.66) (0 patients with CR, 1 VGPR, 15 PR, 2 MR, and 11 inevaluable). The response rate allowing for use of serum monoclonal protein levels when a measurable urine monoclonal protein was unavailable at follow-up was 59.5% (1 patient with CR, 1 VGPR, 18 PR, 2 MR, and 6 inevaluable). The median progression free survival is 9.4 months. Thirty-three percent of patients completed the 8 cycles of planned induction therapy and moved to maintenance. Reasons for discontinuing therapy have included progression or death (n=18), adverse events (n=6), and other (n=14). Only 12% of patients remain on active therapy: 0% of deletion 13q patients; 25% of t(4:14) and 12% each of high B2M and high PCLI patients. Of the 14 patients who entered the maintenance phase of treatment, 3 have progressed. Of these 3, 2 took re-induction, and neither responded. Median time to progression for those entering maintenance was12.4 months from the time of starting maintenance. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher included neutropenia (33%), diarrhea (31%), hyponatremia (21%), anemia (19%), thrombocytopenia (16%), fatigue (14%). Grade 1–2 sensory peripheral neuropathy occurred in 53% of patients, with only 2% having grade 3 sensory neuropathy. One patient had grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. One patient died after receiving 2 doses of protocol treatment due to heart block and asystole. Updated results on the full study population will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: In high risk patients, upfront bortezomib appears to result in comparable response rates to those reported for unselected cohorts of newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Continued follow-up of these patients will provide information about whether this will translate into better overall outcomes. Figure Figure

Download Full-text

A Phase II Study of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD), Bortezomib, Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide (DVD-R) for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3044.3044 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3044-3044

Author(s):

James R. Berenson ◽

Ori Yellin ◽

Alan D. Cartmell ◽

Thomas B. S. Woliver ◽

Marshall S. Flam ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Response Rates ◽

High Response ◽

Hand Foot Syndrome ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3044 Background: Despite the availability of many new therapeutic options showing efficacy for R/R MM patients, many of these treatments produce significant side effects and the disease remains incurable. The combination of PLD and bortezomib has shown significant anti-MM efficacy leading to FDA approval of that combination for patients who have received one prior therapy and are naïve to bortezomib. Moreover, the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone has also been approved for patients who have received one prior regimen. However, both regimens are associated with significant toxicity and produce response rates in only 40–60% of patients. Previous studies in our laboratory show the increased efficacy and improved tolerability of PLD given daily compared to weekly administration in severe combined immunodeficient mice bearing human MM. Based on these results and the frequent occurrence of peripheral neuropathy with bortezomib when given at 1.3 mg/m2 dose on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 3-week schedule, we modified the doses and schedules of both drugs and added intravenous (i.v) dexamethasone for MM patients. Using a modified lower dose (1.0 mg/m2) and longer cycle (4 weeks) of bortezomib administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 with lower dose PLD and intravenous (i.v.) dexamethasone administered on the same days for MM patients in both the frontline and R/R setting, we have shown the efficacy and marked reduction in AEs including neuropathy, hematologic, and hand-foot syndrome. A recent phase I/II trial investigating the combination of higher doses of lenalidomide, bortezomib, oral dexamethasone, and PLD on a 3-week schedule for newly diagnosed MM patients showed a high response rate but was associated with frequent AEs. Methods: Thus, we conducted a single-arm multi-center phase II study for R/R MM patients to evaluate the combination of i.v. dexamethasone, bortezomib, PLD, and lenalidomide. The treatment consisted of 40 mg dexamethasone followed by 1.0 mg/m2 bortezomib and then 4.0 mg/m2 PLD on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 28-day cycle. Lenalidomide was administered orally at a dose of 10 mg daily on days 1–14 of each cycle. Patients were treated to a maximum response plus two additional cycles or completed a maximum of eight cycles of therapy without disease progression. Results: Eighteen (of 40 planned) patients have been enrolled to date with a median age of 72 years (range, 34–82 years). Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 (1-17) prior regimens. Sixteen (89%) patients received prior bortezomib and 11 (61%) were previously treated with either doxorubicin or PLD. Seven (39%) of these patients were exposed to both drugs. Fifteen (83%) had received prior glucocorticoids. Nine (50%) individuals had received immunomodulatory agents with 6 (33%) having been exposed to lenalidomide and all 9 to thalidomide. The majority of patients (72 %) showed International Staging System II or III disease. To date, 16 patients (89%) have shown objective responses to the DVD-R regimen, including 1 complete response (6%), 5 very good partial responses (28%), 4 partial responses (22%) and 6 minimal responses (33%). One of the nonresponding patients showed stable disease and the other progressed after one cycle of therapy. Thus, disease control was achieved in all but one patient (94%). To date, 6 patients have shown progressive disease after a median follow-up time of 6 months (1+ - 9+ months). The DVD-R regimen was well tolerated and only one patient discontinued treatment because of toxicity (peripheral neuropathy). Ten patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The most common grade 3 adverse events were reversible neutropenia (n=3), pneumonia (n=3), reversible anemia (n=2), and thrombocytopenia (n=2). There were two patients with grade 4 thrombocytopenia that was reversible. To date, 5 patients (28%) have developed treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy (four grade 1 and one grade 3). Notably, there have been no cases of stomatitis or hand-foot syndrome. Conclusions: Thus, these results suggest that the DVD-R regimen using a modified schedule and doses of the combination of intravenous dexamethasone, bortezomib, PLD and lenalidomide is a well tolerated treatment that produces high response rates for heavily previously treated MM patients with R/R disease. Disclosures: Berenson: Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Centocor OrthoBiotech: Consultancy. Vescio:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Swift:Millennium: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Evaluating Venetoclax Treatment Duration When Combined with Hypomethylating Agents in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146583 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4412-4412

Author(s):

Emma Uchida ◽

Matthew M Lei ◽

Andrew M. Brunner ◽

Amir T. Fathi ◽

Jessie Signorelli

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Allogeneic Transplant ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Current literature recommends 28-day cycles of a hypomethylating agent (HMA) with continuous daily venetoclax (Ven) in select patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Key adverse events observed with azacitidine-Ven were grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia. Emerging data recommends HMA-Ven in relapsed/refractory (r/r) high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with a Ven duration ranging from 14-28 days of a 28-day cycle. Predominant grade ≥ 3 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) also included cytopenias in this patient population. As the combination of HMA-Ven for patients with MDS and AML is increasingly utilized, practice variations in the initial duration of Ven requires evaluation. This study aims to characterize the safety profile with continuous or modified duration Ven after complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) or cycle 3 to further assess the safety profile of HMA-Ven due to treatment instead of disease. Methods: This is a retrospective, single center study of patients > 18 years of age with AML or MDS receiving HMA-Ven between December 1, 2017 - January 31, 2021. Patients were excluded if enrolled in an investigational protocol or received therapy at an outside hospital. To capture treatment-related neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and other safety endpoints, patients were excluded if they received < 3 cycles of HMA-Ven, as cytopenias could be due to disease burden. Data was collected from day -21 until the completion of cycle 6 or last completed cycle. The primary end point was grade > 3 neutropenia for > 7 days. Secondary endpoints included grade > 3 anemia or thrombocytopenia for > 7 days, incidence of febrile neutropenia, antimicrobial use, dose interruption or delay, dose or duration modification, therapy discontinuation, and assessment of CR and CRi. Descriptive statistics were utilized to describe outcomes and safety endpoints were graded with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 (CTCAE v.5.0). Results: 25 patients were included in analysis. The median age was 66 years (range 20-84) and 12% (n=3) had a diagnosis of MDS while 88% (n=22) had a diagnosis of AML. Most patients with AML had poor cytogenetic risk (n=18, 84%) and 28% (n=7) were treatment naïve. Prior therapies are outlined in Table 1. Ven was initiated with a 14-day duration in 60% (n=15) of patients, including 3 patients with MDS, 4 patients with r/r AML, and 4 patients with r/r AML with a prior allogeneic transplant. Many patients required a subsequent duration change of Ven throughout the evaluation period (n=13, 52%). Treatment delays of > 7 days occurred in 60% (n=15) of patients. 12 patients (48%) achieved CR or CRi and accounted for 45 evaluated cycles. Of the 12 patients, 4 started with 28-day ven, 1 with 21-day, and 7 with 14-day. Of the patients who achieved CR or CRi, there were 32 cycles with Ven 14-day durations, 7 cycles with 21-day duration, and 6 cycles of 28-day duration. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia for > 7 days was observed in 72% (n=23) of the 14-day durations and 100% of the 21-day and 28-day Ven durations. Grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia and anemia was most common in the 28-day duration Ven at 83% (n=5) and 50% (n=3), respectively. Febrile neutropenia and treatment with antibiotic therapy had higher incidence of 67% (n=4) in the 28-day Ven duration. Most patients received treatment with antibiotic therapy (75%, n=9) and antifungal therapy (67%, n=8) after achieving CR or CRi on HMA-Ven. In those with newly diagnosed AML, 29% (n=2) and 57% (n=4) achieved CR and CRi respectively. 67% (n=2) of the MDS patients and 27% (n=4) of the r/r AML population achieved CRi. Of the 9 patients with prior HMA exposure, 2 patients achieved CRi. Conclusions: There was a high incidence of grade 3 or higher cytopenias, but a trend toward increased neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and infectious complications were observed in those receiving a 21-day or 28-day Ven duration after CR or CRi compared to those receiving a 14-day duration of Ven. Early decreased durations of Ven and further decreases outside the prescribing information after patients are in CR may be a reasonable and safe option for patients who are not likely to tolerate continuous Ven, such as those with prior MDS, r/r disease, or patients who have received prior allogeneic transplant. This requires further investigation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lei: AbbVie: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria; Intervention Insights: Consultancy; Fresenius Kabi: Consultancy. Brunner: GSK: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy; Keros Therapeutics: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Acceleron: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fathi: Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Foghorn: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kura: Consultancy, Honoraria; Trillium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Blueprint: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ipsen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Signorelli: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; AbbVie: Honoraria.

Download Full-text