Preliminary Results of a Phase II Study to Determine the Safety of Defibrotide in Children and Adolescents with Sickle Cell Disease-Associated Acute Chest Syndrome (IND 127812)

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a vasculopathy resulting in recurrent vaso-occlusive crises leading to endothelial dysfunction, chronic end-organ damage, poor quality of life, early mortality and the major curative therapy to date is allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AlloSCT) (Talano/Cairo, EJH, 2015). Acute chest syndrome (ACS) can result in pulmonary hypertension and is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with SCD (Gladwin et al, NEJM, 2008). ACS accounts for 25% of deaths (Vichinsky et al, Blood, 1997). Clinical definition of ACS is chest pain, fever, cough, dyspnea, and new pulmonary infiltrate on chest radiography. Defibrotide was approved in the US for the treatment of severe sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) with renal or pulmonary dysfunction following HSCT (Cairo et al, BJH, 2020). Defibrotide primarily targets endothelium in microvascular beds and has anti-inflammatory and anti-coagulant activity, which can treat the underlying pathophysiology of ACS (Falanga et al, Leukemia, 2003 and Scallia et al, Clin Pharm, 1996 and Pescador et al, Vasc Pharm, 2013). Objective: To determine the safety and toxicity of defibrotide in children, adolescents, and young adults with SCD-associated ACS. Design/Methods: Patients with SCD aged 2 to 40 years meeting ACS criteria (at least two of the following: fever, chest pain, cough, dyspnea, tachypnea, pulmonary infiltrate on chest imaging, decreased oxygen saturation with or without supplemental oxygen requirements) and eligibility were enrolled within 72 hours of diagnosis after consent was obtained (NCT03805581). Baseline studies comprised of chest radiograph, CT chest angiogram, echocardiography with TRJ velocity and brachial artery reactivity, pulmonary function tests, and biomarkers (IFN-a and -g, TNF-a, IL-6, 8, and 10, sCD163, TSP-1, secretory phospholipase A(2), sVCAM-1, sTNFR1, Ang2, sTei-2, PAI-1, sICAM-1, sP-and sE-selectin, sPECAM-1, VEGF-A, C, D and sVEGFR1 and 2). Defibrotide was administered at 6.25mg/kg IV q6 hours and continued for 7 days or until time of discharge, whichever occurred earlier and patients were followed until day +30 following defibrotide. Dose limiting toxicities include Grade III/IV infusion/allergic reaction or hemorrhage probably or directly related to defibrotide. Results: We have enrolled thirteen patients aged 3 to 18 years with a gender ratio (M/F) of 4/9. Patients' genotypes are as follows: hemoglobin SS disease in nine patients, hemoglobin SC disease in two patients, and hemoglobin Sb0/+ thalassemia in two patients. Presenting symptoms included fever, chest pain, cough, dyspnea, tachypnea, pulmonary infiltrate on imaging, and hypoxia.Eight patients completed seven days of treatment, one patient received 6 days of treatment, three patients were discharged after three days of treatment, and one patient withdrew due to recurrent fevers unrelated to defibrotide. All but one patient had resolution of fevers prior to end of treatment. Patients required an average of 1.15 days of oxygen support, with one patient requiring high flow nasal cannula, and no patients required mechanical ventilation. There were no adverse events possibly, probably, or directly related to defibrotide. There was no evidence of hemorrhage in any patient despite four patients receiving concomitant ketorolac or ibuprofen. Of the eleven patients who had pulmonary infiltrates on imaging, eight were evaluated on day +30, two had complete resolution of infiltrate, five had improvements, and one had no change. Seven patients did not follow-up for echocardiography or pulmonary function testing and two of those patients were unable to be evaluated at day +30 due to COVID-19. Discussion: The preliminary data suggest defibrotide is safe and well tolerated in patients with SCD-related ACS. All patients at diagnosis have had baseline studies, which included biomarkers; however, only eight of the thirteen patients have completed all required observations due to poor compliance. After four patients were enrolled and three failed to follow-up, changes to appointment schedules were made with detailed information on all follow-ups. Efforts at improving compliance post therapy are ongoing. Further accrual is needed to determine clinical significance of improvements in cardiac and/or pulmonary function. This study was funded in part by a grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Disclosures Cooke: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cairo:Nektar Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Technology Inc/Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Miltenyi: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Defibrotide is utilized in patients with acute chest syndrome to decrease the amount of time they are hospitalized and to assist in alleviating symptoms. Defibrotide is approved in the US for sinusoidal obstructive syndrome with renal or pulmonary dysfunction.

Download Full-text

Association of Hospitalization Due to Vaso-Occlusive Crisis with Subsequent Sickle Cell Disease-Related Organ Damage Hospitalization: Retrospective Analysis of 3-Year Observational Study Data

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-144723 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2037-2037

Author(s):

Matthew M. Heeney ◽

Thirupathi Pattipaka ◽

Jilles M. Fermont

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Gallbladder Disease ◽

Organ Damage ◽

Study Data ◽

Acute Chest Syndrome ◽

Cell Disease ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

History Of

Abstract Background: Hospitalization due to vaso-occlusive crisis (H-VOC) is common in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD), with an increasing occurrence of SCD-related complications, including organ damage, as the disease progresses. Evidence regarding the relationship between H-VOC and SCD-related organ damage, however, is lacking. Aim: To assess whether H-VOC is associated with hospitalization due to SCD-related organ damage, through retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively during a 3-year, multicenter, observational US study (NCT01220115) that aimed to better understand disease burden and management of SCD in individuals aged ≥2 years. Methods: Of the 498 individuals with SCD who were recruited into the US study, data were analyzed from 202 (100 men and 102 women) who were aged ≥16 years and had available hospital admission data. Organ damage was defined based on hospital discharge diagnosis. 1 Variables tested at baseline, in addition to H-VOC, included demographics, blood measures, and treatment history. Age and sex were included by default in all models based on literature suggesting they are relevant factors influencing organ damage. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the time from H-VOC to the first subsequent hospitalization due to SCD-related organ damage were estimated using multivariable Cox regression. Worsening of pre-existing organ damage was not considered as an event due to potential confounding (ie worsening of organ damage related to the pre-existing condition rather than as a consequence of the VOC). Results: During median 3-year follow-up, 55 (27%) individuals experienced at least one hospitalization due to SCD-related organ damage; 2 19 (9%) had multiple visits. Within the 12 months preceding baseline, 22 (11%) individuals had a history of organ damage, there was a median of two H-VOC in the 90 (45%) individuals with history of H-VOC, and 43 (21%) individuals had received chronic transfusion (≥6). History of H-VOC (HR 2.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46 to 4.43 in past 12 months), genotype (HR 2.69, 95% CI 1.34 to 5.41 for HbSS), and sex (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.34 for women) were all significantly associated with subsequent hospitalization for SCD-related organ damage. Discussion and conclusion: This analysis demonstrates that history of H-VOC within the preceding 12 months is significantly associated with a higher rate of subsequent hospitalization due to SCD-related organ damage, independent of age, sex, and genotype, and may therefore help identify individuals at high risk of developing organ damage. Despite 21% of individuals receiving chronic transfusions at baseline, this factor did not remain significantly associated with the outcome when also considering genotype and H-VOC. Age and sex were unexpectedly insignificantly associated with the outcome; this is likely due to the relatively short follow-up time. Extending the historical timeframe of organ damage to 5 years did not change our findings, except that age also became significantly associated with subsequent hospitalization for organ damage. Acute chest syndrome and pneumonia were the most common types of historical (baseline) organ damage, whilst gallbladder disease was the most common organ damage observed during the follow-up period that was not observed at baseline. Our data have limited statistical power and generalizability; additional studies are required to confirm these findings. Nevertheless, our findings support the existing evidence of the impact that VOCs may have on individuals with SCD, and highlights the importance of preventing and reducing H-VOC. 1Acute chest syndrome or pneumonia; avascular bone necrosis of hip(s), shoulder(s) or spine; cardiac failure; central nervous system disease (ie abnormal transcranial Doppler, silent infarct, stroke and transient ischemic attack); gallbladder disease; leg ulcer; liver disease (ie hepatic fibrosis/ cirrhosis, hepatic sequestration/sickle-hepatopathy/intrahepatic sickling, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension); priapism; renal disease (ie acute renal failure, chronic renal failure-supportive, dialysis, microalbuminuria/ proteinuria, transplant); retinopathy; and splenic sequestration. 2The top 3 reasons for hospitalization due to SCD-related organ damage were acute chest syndrome or pneumonia (n=29; 53%), renal disease (n=7; 13%) and gallbladder disease (n=6; 11%). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Heeney: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; FORMA: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Vertex / Crispr Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: DSMB; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Keros: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: DSMB; Cyclerion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pattipaka: Novartis: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Fermont: Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Download Full-text

Sickle-Cell Disease Patients' Attitudes Towards Their Treatment with Hydroxycarbamide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125673 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1013-1013

Author(s):

Frédéric Galactéros ◽

Ersi Voskaridou ◽

Anoosha Habibi ◽

Giovanna Cannas ◽

Laure Joseph ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sickle Cell Disease ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Sickle Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Fetal Hemoglobin ◽

Treatment Discontinuation ◽

Cell Disease ◽

Advisory Committees

Hydroxyurea (HU) is approved in the EU and USA for prevention of vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) including acute chest syndromes (ACS) in patients over 2 years with sickle-cell disease (SCD). The major benefits of HU in SCD are directly related to its abilities to increase HbF, decrease sickling of red blood cells and hemolysis, leading to reduction of vaso-occlusive episodes, need for blood transfusions and consequently reduction of morbidity and mortality. Adherence to the treatment is paramount for effectiveness, but in spite of proven benefits, barriers to adherence persist.[1] ESCORT-HU study (European Sickle Cell Disease COhoRT - HydroxyUrea), is a multicentric, prospective, non-interventional European study designed to evaluate the safety profile of HU in real life. Patients were enrolled from January 2009 to June 2017 with a follow-up of up to 10 years. All interruptions and resumptions of HU treatment exceeding 15 days were recorded in this study. We hereby present the analysis of the group of patients who self-discontinued HU at least once during the study before informing their caregiver, with a view to identify potential barriers to long-term adherence. In total, 1906 patients were enrolled in ESCORT-HU from 63 centers in France, Germany, Greece and Italy. Of these, 619 patients (32%) stopped HU for over 15 days at least once, and around a third (11% of all patients) were due to patient's will. The mean duration of HU treatment before the first discontinuation was 4.8 ± 5.1 years. Data are summarized in table 1. Compared to the rest of the cohort, the 'treatment discontinuation' group had similar distribution by gender and indication for HU prescription, but a higher proportion of adults stopped HU more than 15 days. It is notable that the proportion of patients with SC genotype was higher in the 'treatment discontinuation' group (4.5% vs 1.7%). The patients in the 'treatment discontinuation' group had more frequent SCD symptoms before enrolment in the study (table 2). Hematological and clinical improvement compared to the baseline was observed in both groups. However, average mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) and Fetal Hemoglobin percentage (HbF%) were lower and mean percentages of patients with SCD symptoms were higher over the three years of follow-up in the 'treatment discontinuation' group, suggesting that HU daily dose was insufficient (table 2). Sixty patients have no treatment resumption date reported which suggest a permanent interruption of their treatment. Among them 32% preferred to switch to another HU medicinal product and 13% have safety issue (table 3). Understanding and managing self-discontinuation of HU before taking medical advice is challenging for the physician. It is tempting to speculate that it may be due, at least in part, to lack of effectiveness potentially due to an underdosage of the treatment. Resistance to the treatment may also be suggested based on past literature data revealing a great variability in the response (determined by HbF%) to HU therapy. There is evidence that genetic modifiers affect individual response to HU.[2],[3] Finally, weariness from long-term use may also explain the patient's wish to discontinue HU. But treatment at optimal effective should be the primary goal of caregivers. [1]Smaldone A., Manwani D., Green NS, Greater number of perceived barriers to hydroxyurea associated with poorer health-related quality of life in youth with sickle cell disease, Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 [2] Steinberg MH, Voskaridou E, Kutlar A, Loukopoulos D, Koshy M, et al. (2003). Concordant fetal hemoglobin response to hydroxyurea in siblings with sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol 72: 121-126 [3] Ware RE, Despotovic JM, Mortier NA, Flanagan JM, He J, et al. (2011) Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics of hydroxyurea treatment for children with sickle cell anemia. Blood 118: 4985-4991 Disclosures Galactéros: Addmedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Voskaridou:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Protagonist: Research Funding; Genesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acceleron: Consultancy, Research Funding; Addmedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cannas:Addmedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Real World Evidence of Prescription Patterns and Effect of Oxbryta (voxelotor) for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-143434 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 31-32

Author(s):

Nirmish Shah ◽

Ahmar Urooj Zaidi ◽

Michael U. Callaghan ◽

Darla Liles ◽

Clarissa E. Johnson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Sickle Cell ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Disease ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Real World Evidence ◽

Disease Modifying

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic illness characterized by anemia, recurrent severe pain and recurrent organ damage, affecting approximately 100,000 persons in the United States. Prior to November 2019, FDA approved SCD disease-modifying treatments included only hydroxyurea (HU) and L-glutamine. However, voxelotor (Oxbryta®) was recently approved under an accelerated approval based on the HOPE study for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with SCD 12 years of age and older. We aimed to provide real world evidence of the types of patients prescribed voxelotor and preliminary evidence of potential treatment effects. Methods: Patient records were reviewed from five medical centers with comprehensive sickle cell care. All patients prescribed voxelotor from Nov 25, 2019 to July 31, 2020 were included in our analysis. Data reviewed included: patient demographics, hydroxyurea use, as well as pre- and post- voxelotor changes on red cell transfusion number, vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and hemoglobin (Hb) values. In addition, voxelotor dosage changes, side effects, and patients perception on impact on their health were recorded. Descriptive and summary statistics were used to provide results. Results: We reviewed data from 60 patients (18 pediatric and 42 adult), across the five centers, who were prescribed voxelotor. Mean age was 33 (SD 13.8) years old with 63% female patients. All patients were African-American/Black and 96% were HbSS (2% Hb SC and 2% HbSOArab). Eighty (80)% were on hydroxyurea, 20% were on chronic transfusions, and 10% were on erythropoietin stimulating agents when prescribed voxelotor. Mean baseline hemoglobin during the 3 months prior to initiation was 7.38 g/dL (SD 1.46) with all patients started at the recommended dose of 1500mg. Annualized VOC events for the year prior to starting voxelotor was 0.62 (SD) or 7.44 VOCs per year. Across all sites, 31 patients were prescribed voxelotor but had either not initiated drug, not returned for follow up labs at time of analysis, or refused to take drug once approved (n=1). Nine patients had only 1 month of follow labs to review and an additional 18 patients with 3 months of follow up labs. These 27 patients were followed for an average of 6.0 months (SD 7.7) on treatment with 4 patients (15%) requiring dose adjustment to 1000mg. Dose adjustments were for side effects including abdominal pain, diarrhea, loose stools and nausea/vomiting. One patient had dosing changed from daily to three times a day. Average hemoglobin during steady state after 1 and 3 months of treatment were 8.6 g/dL (SD 1.8) and 8.0 g/dL (SD 1.8), respectively. In addition, 52% increased by 1g/dL at 1 month (n=21) and 44% increased by 1g/dL at 3 months (n=18). The mean maximum hemoglobin obtained during the 3-month period following initiation of voxelotor was 8.9 (SD 2.1) g/dL. During follow up visits, several patients reported 'more energy' and improvement in 'morning achiness' and 'quality of life', while a few patients noted no change in stamina or well-being. Three patients (5%) had drug discontinued due to becoming pregnant, unexplained elevation of liver enzymes, and due to excessive abdominal pain and nausea. Annualized VOC rates after voxelotor initiation were numerically decreased, although limited by short follow up. Conclusion: We present real world evidence of prescribing patterns and initial outcomes from the use of newly approved voxelotor. We found the majority of patients prescribed voxelotor were the HbSS genotype, on hydroxyurea, and with a mean baseline Hb <7.5 g/dL, indicating an initial focus on more anemic patients. Interestingly, one-fifth of the prescribed patients where on chronic transfusions. Consistent with the HOPE trial, the average Hb levels was found to have increased at 1 month and 3-month follow up. Our preliminary results support an overall increase in hemoglobin in patients treated with voxelotor and we aim to continue following patients over a longer follow up period. This provides important real-world evidence for this newly approved disease-modifying therapy for SCD. Disclosures Shah: Alexion: Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy. Zaidi:Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Emmaus Life Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Imara: Consultancy, Honoraria; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cyclerion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Callaghan:Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Site Investigator/sub-I Clinical Trial, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Site Investigator/sub-I Clinical Trial, Research Funding; Sancillio: Other; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Other, Speakers Bureau; Biomarin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Site Investigator/sub-I Clinical Trial, Speakers Bureau; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Speakers Bureau; Alnylum: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spark: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Hema Biologics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. De Castro:Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; FORMA Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlycoMimetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

A Pilot Study of Eptifibatide for Treatment of Acute Pain Episodes in Sickle Cell Disease.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2102.2102 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2102-2102

Author(s):

Payal C Desai ◽

Julia Brittain ◽

Susan Jones ◽

Adam McDonald ◽

Douglas R Wilson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sickle Cell Disease ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Sickle Cell ◽

Acute Pain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Point Estimate ◽

Acute Chest Syndrome ◽

Cell Disease ◽

Opioid Use ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 2102 Background: Despite the abundant laboratory evidence of platelet activation and inflammation in sickle cell disease (SCD), the contribution of these changes to the pathogenesis of SCD remains uncertain. Patients with SCD exhibit increased platelet activation in the non-crisis, “steady state,” and further increases with acute pain episodes. In addition, levels of the inflammatory mediator, CD40 ligand (CD40L) are increased in the plasma and significantly reduced in the platelets of SCD patients compared to healthy individuals. CD40L may contribute to the pathogenesis of acute pain episodes. Despite an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of SCD, the treatment of acute pain episodes is supportive. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eptifibatide, a synthetic peptide inhibitor of the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor, in patients with SCD during acute painful episodes. Methods: In this single site placebo-controlled trial, eligible patients admitted for acute painful episodes received eptifibatide (two 180 mg/kg boluses 10 minutes apart, followed by a continuous infusion at 2 mg/kg/min for 6 hours) or placebo at a ratio of 2:1. The Post-Treatment Phase lasted for up to 7 days or until resolution of the crisis, whichever was shorter, but no less than 24 hours after discontinuation of infusion. The Follow-up Phase included safety evaluations obtained 14 to 17 days and 28 to 35 days after discontinuation of infusion. The primary outcomes were major bleeding episodes and the largest observed decrease in platelet count during the study. We also evaluated the effect of eptifibatide on the duration of acute pain episodes, pain intensity, duration of hospitalization, total opioid use and acute chest syndrome. Results: Thirteen patients (SS - 10, Sb0 - 2, SC - 1) were randomized to receive either eptifibatide (N=9; 6 females; median age - 25 years) or placebo (N=4; 3 females; median age - 31 years). One patient in the eptifibatide arm withdrew consent following completion of study drug infusion and 1 patient in the placebo arm was withdrawn early because she did not meet eligibility criteria. In the intent-to-treat analysis, there were no major bleeding episodes in either group (point estimate of difference in eptifibatide vs. placebo proportion: 0.0, 95% CI; −0.60, 0.37).There was one minor bleeding episode in a patient on the eptifibatide arm (point estimate of difference in eptifibatide vs. placebo proportion: 0.11, 95% CI: −0.502, 0.494). There was a trend for the largest decrease in platelet count to be greater in the eptifibatide arm compared to the placebo arm, although the difference was not statistically significant (Hodges-Lehman estimate of location shift for eptifibatide vs. placebo: −82, 95% CI; −281, 54). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with thrombocytopenia between the treatment groups (point estimate of difference in eptifibatide vs. placebo proportion: 0.11, 95% CI: −0.587, 0.495). The median time to discharge and the median time to crisis resolution were 3.0 days for both treatment arms. The median total opioid use was 400.2 morphine equivalents (ME) for the eptifibatide group and 1471 ME for the placebo group (Hodges-Lehman estimate of location shift for eptifibatide vs. placebo: −65.8, 95% CI: −2519, 1700). There was one episode of acute chest syndrome in each treatment arm. Conclusions: In this small study of SCD patients hospitalized with acute painful episodes, eptifibatide appeared to be safe, but did not improve the times to crisis resolution or hospital discharge. Eptifibatide was associated with a reduced requirement for opioid analgesics, although the difference was not statistically significant. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00834899. Disclosures: Parise: BD: Consultancy; Biogen-Idec: Consultancy; NIH: Research Funding; AHA: Research Funding; SCDAC-NIH: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BRI Milwaukee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ataga:Pfizer: Consultancy; HemaQuest Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adventrx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Eptifibatide, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, was evaluated as treatment for acute pain episodes in patients with sickle cell disease.

Download Full-text

Comparative Effectiveness of Triplets Containing Bortezomib (V), Carfilzomib (K), or Ixazomib (I) Combined with a Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Backbone (Rd) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) in Routine Care in the United States (US)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-121658 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1827-1827

Author(s):

Ajai Chari ◽

Dorothy Romanus ◽

Aditya Raju ◽

Lauren Cain ◽

Marlo Blazer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Comparative Effectiveness ◽

Research Funding ◽

Routine Care ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Us ◽

Frailty Score

BACKGROUND: Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) combined with an Rd backbone constitute commonly used regimens in RRMM in the US. Lack of data from head-to-head clinical trials comparing the efficacy of these PI-Rd triplets and the extent to which efficacy translates to benefit in routine care highlight the need for real-world evidence. We conducted a comparative effectiveness analysis of time to next therapy (TTNT) of these PI-Rd triplet combinations in a real-world representative cohort of RRMM patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, RRMM patients who initiated an index regimen with IRd, KRd, or VRd in ≥2nd line of therapy (LOT 2+) were followed between 1/2014-9/2018 in Optum's deidentified national electronic health records database. This database captures information on all patients treated by >140,000 providers across 50 states in the US. It is representative of the US general population. Baseline data included: a modified frailty score utilizing age and Charlson Comorbidity Index1, ECOG performance status, CRAB symptoms, ISS stage, cytogenetic risk (high: del[17p], t[4;14], or t[14;16]), history of: cardiovascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, stem-cell transplant, and uncontrolled hypertension, prior PI and/or IMID exposure and refractory status, time from diagnosis to start of index LOT, time from start of frontline therapy to start of LOT 2, and treatment-free interval prior to index LOT. Duration of therapy (DOT) and TTNT were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using stratified (by LOT) ± baseline-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models with a repeated measures analysis of pt-LOTs with robust sandwich estimators to account for inclusion of patients in multiple LOTs. The main analysis was repeated in subgroups a priori defined by frailty score, cytogenetic risk, prior PI and/or IMID exposure and LOT. Observations were censored at time of loss to follow up/end of study period (9/30/2018). RESULTS: Overall, 650 patients with 733 pt-LOTs (IRd, n=168; KRd, n=208; VRd, n=357) were included; 20% of the RRMM patients in this cohort were treated at academic centers. In the I-/K-/V-Rd groups, respectively, median age was 71/65/71 years and 42/22/38% patients were ≥75 years old; 39/55/46% and 28/14/29% patients had a modified frailty score of intermediate and frail, respectively; 71/88/80% had a symptomatic relapse with at least 1 CRAB symptom; 20/28/13% patients had high cytogenetic risk; 69/72/90% patients were treated in 2-3 LOT, and 63/70/32% patients had prior exposure to a PI+IMID (P<0.05 for all). The median follow-up was 14.4 months. Unadjusted median DOT of index LOT was 12.3/7.2/10.0 months, with a lower risk of discontinuation of the oral PI component for I in comparison to both K and V (HR[I vs K] of 0.66 and HR[I vs V] of 0.68) and R component in the IRd vs KRd and VRd groups (HR[I vs K] of 0.64 and HR[I vs V] of 0.75) (P<0.05 for all). Unadjusted median TTNT was 12.7/8.6/14.2 months for I-/K-/V-Rd in LOT ≥2; with HR for TTNT of 0.76 (IRd vs KRd; P<0.05); 1.01 (IRd vs VRd; P=0.96); 1.33 (KRd vs VRd; P<0.05). The adjusted HRs for TTNT I-/K-/V-Rd in LOT ≥2 were 0.82 (IRd vs KRd); 0.93 (IRd vs VRd); 1.13 (KRd vs VRd; P>0.05 for all), and were comparable between all 3 groups. A significant TTNT benefit for IRd vs KRd was observed among patients with high cytogenetic risk (HR: 0.47) and with intermediate frailtymodified score (HR: 0.60; P<0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world representative RRMM cohort, in unadjusted analyses, the IRd group had a longer DOT of the PI and R components and a longer TTNT in comparison with KRd. After adjusting for baseline confounders to separate the treatment effect, the I/K/V-Rd triplet combinations were comparable in TTNT, but IRd was significantly better than KRd in patients with high-risk cytogenetics and with an intermediate frailty score. Residual confounding is always a potential limitation of any non-randomized study. Conversely, the results of randomized, clinical trials are limited in generalizability as 40-60% of patients are excluded due to inability to meet eligibility criteria. This is especially pertinent in an elderly RRMM population as demonstrated in the real-world effectiveness results in this study. Ref: 1. Palumbo, et al. Blood. 2015;125:2068-2074 Figure Disclosures Chari: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Romanus:Takeda: Employment. Raju:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Other: Xcenda received funding from Takeda to complete this analyses., Research Funding; Xcenda, LLC: Employment. Cain:Takeda: Employment. Blazer:Xcenda: Employment; Takeda: Other: Xcenda received funding from Takeda for completion of this analysis, Research Funding. Farrelly:Xcenda: Employment; Takeda: Other: Xcenda received funding from Takeda for completion of this analysis, Research Funding. Stull:Takeda: Employment. Ailawadhi:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The Burden of Atrial Fibrillation in Sickle Cell Disease

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150564 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3119-3119

Author(s):

Chinonso Ukeje ◽

Bahaa Al-Azzam ◽

Santosh L. Saraf ◽

Dawood Darbar ◽

David Tofovic

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Life Expectancy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Observation Time ◽

Hemoglobin Level ◽

Categorical Variables ◽

Cell Disease ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction Life expectancy amongst individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) has plateaued, with cardiopulmonary complications now becoming a leading cause of death (Fitzhugh et al. Am. J. Hematology 2010). Indeed, SCD is associated with increased rates of pulmonary hypertension (pHTN) and diastolic dysfunction (Sachdev et al. Blood 2005). In the general population, atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased mortality in the setting of either pHTN or diastolic dysfunction. Although cardiac structural and biochemical changes likely create an electrophysiological substrate for AF in SCD, the prevalence and risk factors for AF in SCD remain unclear. We determined the prevalence, incidence, and clinical characteristics of AF in a large cohort of patients with SCD. Methods We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of all adult patients with SCD seen at our large, urban single center from January 2008 to December 2017. SCD patients were identified using a previously described semi-automated system with a subset with direct chart review (Srisuwananukorn et al. Blood Advances 2020). We performed manual review of ~17,000 available electrocardiograms of all enrolled subjects to look for AF. For univariate analyses, the associations of linear and categorical variables with AF were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Pearson's χ 2 test, respectively. We used Bonferroni correction for categorical variables with greater than two groups. Logistic regression analysis with stepwise addition of variables (p>0.15) was used to evaluate for the effects of previously described AF risk factors, degree of anemia, hydroxyurea use, and genotype on AF development. Results Our cohort consisted of 763 adult SCD patients with a median age of 27.95 years, 59.50% female, 72.4% with Hb SS or Sβ 0-thalassemia genotype, and 61.2% were prescribed hydroxyurea. Mean observation time for the cohort was 8.3 ± 6.3 yrs. We identified AF in 30 out of 763 adult SCD individuals with a mean age onset of 51 ± 10 years (median age 52 years). The period prevalence of AF was 3.93% and the incidence density was 3.02 per 1000 patient years observed. Individuals with AF tended to be older at initial (40 vs. 25 years, p<0.0001) and follow-up (53 vs. 35 years, p<0.0001) visits and were observed for a longer period (13.3 vs. 9.5 years, p=0.0014). There was no difference in gender (p=0.7), ethnicity (p=0.5), or SCD genotype (p=0.03) between groups (see Table 1). Those with AF were more likely to carry diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p=0.0004), hypertension (p<0.0001), chronic kidney disease (p<0.0001), type 2 diabetes (p<0.0001), and any cancer (p=0.04). However, hydroxyurea use was not associated with AF development (p=0.3). SCD patients with AF were more likely to receive diuretics, atrioventricular nodal blocking agents, antihypertensives, antiplatelets, and statin therapies (see Table 1). AF was associated with worse anemia and reduced renal function. Regression analysis identified significant odds ratios (ORs) for age at initial visit (OR 1.06, p=0.03), serum creatinine per 1 mg/dL increase (OR 2.34, p=0.02), hemoglobin level per 1 g/dL increase (OR 0.52, p=0.0009), fetal hemoglobin level per 1% increment (OR 0.81, p=0.008), and total observation time per year follow up (OR 1.26, p=0.0006). Conclusion We showed that the prevalence and incidence of AF is high in patients with SCD with the median age of onset occurring 1-2 decades earlier than in the general populace (Feinberg et al. JAMA Internal Medicine 1995). AF in patients with SCD is associated with advanced age, worse renal function, a higher degree of anemia, and greater usage of cardio- and nephro-active medications. The high incidence of AF in patients with SCD may contribute to the plateauing of life expectancy and identifying the causative risk factors and the underlying mechanisms may not only improve life expectancy but also the quality of life. Further study is warranted. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Saraf: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Real-World Effectiveness of Voxelotor for Treating Sickle Cell Disease in the US

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-140525 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 25-25

Author(s):

Ahmar Urooj Zaidi ◽

Thokozeni Lipato ◽

Ofelia A. Alvarez ◽

Alexander Lonshteyn ◽

Derek Weycker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Index Date ◽

Health Claims ◽

Transfusion Rate ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Us

Background: Until late 2019, few treatments had been approved by the FDA for treating sickle cell disease (SCD). Voxelotor (Oxbryta®) is a sickle hemoglobin-polymerization inhibitor approved by the FDA in November 2019 for treatment of SCD in adults and adolescents aged ≥12 years under an accelerated approval based on results of the pivotal HOPE study. In HOPE, voxelotor increased average hemoglobin (Hb) by 1.1 g/dL from baseline in patients with 1-10 vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) in the previous year and a Hb level between 5.5 and 10.5 g/dL who were not transfusion dependent. Of the participants on voxelotor 1500 mg, 51% had a Hb response >1.0 g/dL at week 24 (Vichinsky et al, NEJM 2019). This study sought to assess the real-world effectiveness of voxelotor based on data during the first 6 months post FDA approval. Methods: Data on medical and pharmacy claims for patients who were aged ≥12 years and receiving voxelotor from December 2019 to May 2020 were obtained from the Symphony Health claims dataset. For each patient, the date of the first voxelotor claim was defined as the "index date." Patients with at least 1 year's data prior to the index date were included in the analyses. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were summarized descriptively. Standardized annualized rates of transfusions and VOCs per patient per year (PPPY) prior to and after voxelotor initiation were compared. A subset of patients in the Symphony Health claims dataset had Hb lab data available. Patients with at least 1 Hb result within 30 days prior to the index date and at least 1 Hb result after the index date were included for Hb analyses. For these patients, change in Hb and the percentage of patients achieving a >1 g/dL increase in Hb were summarized. Confidence intervals and P values for changes in outcomes were based on bootstrapping. Results: As of May 31, 2020, 1275 patients from the Symphony Health claims datasets were identified who received voxelotor (40% male, mean age 35.7 years). In the year prior to voxelotor initiation, 715 (56.1%) of these patients received hydroxyurea, 121 (9.5%) received L-glutamine, 166 (13.0%) received at least 1 transfusion, 17 (1.3%) were on chronic transfusion (≥8 transfusions per year), and 681 (53.4%) had 1 or more VOCs. Mean (SD) follow-up was 64.9 (40.7) days. Among 1275 patients, 175 and 52 patients had at least 1 Hb level measurement during the 1 year prior to and after voxelotor initiation, respectively. Among the subset of patients with their Hb level tested within 30 days prior to the index date and at least 1 Hb level after index date (n=22), the baseline average Hb level was 8.0 g/dL (SD 1.4, median 7.9 g/dL, range 5.0-11.8 g/dL). Mean increase in Hb from baseline was 1.1-1.3 g/dL (Table 1) depending on the approach used to calculate Hb levels after voxelotor initiation; 55% (95% CI 32%-77%) of patients achieved a Hb increase >1 g/dL after voxelotor initiation. Among all 1275 patients, mean (SD) overall transfusion rates declined from 0.45 (1.67) PPPY pre-index to 0.31 (1.88) post-index, a change of -0.14 PPPY (P=0.005). Among 169 patients who received at least 1 transfusion in the year prior to initiation of voxelotor, the transfusion rate dropped from 3.39 (3.34) to 1.75 (4.30) PPPY, a change of -1.64 PPPY (P<0.001). Among 17 patients receiving chronic transfusions, the transfusion rate dropped from 11.29 (3.12) to 6.74 (7.37) PPPY, a change of -4.56 PPPY (P=0.013) (Table 2). After voxelotor initiation, the annualized rates of VOC were numerically reduced from 3.86 (6.69) to 3.64 (8.54) (P=0.248). To address the potential bias from the relatively short follow-up duration, similar results of transfusion and VOC rates were observed among patients with at least 30 days of follow-up or when only events within 3 months prior to index date were considered. Conclusions: Based on the first 6 months' data after the approval of voxelotor in the US, in real-world practice, voxelotor increases Hb by at least 1 g/dL, consistent with the HOPE randomized controlled trial results. Evidence suggests that transfusion rates decreased after voxelotor initiation. A favorable downward trend in VOC rates was also observed. This real-world evidence provides additional support for the use of this novel therapy in the treatment of hemolytic anemia and its associated complications in the SCD population. Further evaluation with a larger sample size and longer follow-up will help to confirm these findings. Disclosures Zaidi: Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cyclerion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Imara: Consultancy, Honoraria; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria; Emmaus Life Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria. Alvarez:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forma Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lonshteyn:Policy Analysis Inc.: Current Employment; Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Weycker:Policy Analysis Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Novartis: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding. Pham:Policy Analysis Inc.: Current Employment; Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Delea:Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Policy Analysis Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company. Agodoa:Global Blood Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Cong:Global Blood Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shah:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Sustainability of Hematological and Clinical Benefits to HU Administration in the Prevention of Sickle-Cell Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Routine Practice

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-116040 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 855-855

Author(s):

Ersi Voskaridou ◽

Lena Oevermann ◽

Corinne Armari-Alla ◽

Uwe Kordes ◽

Frédéric Galactéros ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Sickle Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Routine Practice ◽

Red Cell ◽

Cell Disease ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Clinical Benefits ◽

Adults And Children

Abstract Hydroxyurea (HU) is approved in EU and USA for preventing vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) including acute chest syndromes (ACS) in adults, adolescents and children ≥2 years with sickle-cell disease (SCD). Further to the double blinded, randomized controlled Multicenter Study of Hydroxyurea administration (MSH) which provided the first data on clinical efficacy of HU (Charache 1995), a few follow-up studies suggested that long-term use of HU resulted in significant clinical benefit on patient outcome. This was reflected by lower mortality rates in HU-treated patients compared to conventionally treated patients (Steinberg 2003 & 2010, Voskaridou 2010, Lê 2015). Sustained hematological and clinical response after several years of follow-up at maximal tolerated dose was further shown in subsequent studies, especially the LaSHS study (Voskaridou 2010). Based on these data, the ESCORT-HU (European Sickle Cell Disease COhoRT - HydroxyUrea) study was launched aiming in the establishment of the safety and the sustainability of hematological and clinical benefits to HU administration in the prevention of sickle-cell vaso-occlusive crises in routine practice. We hereby present preliminary results from a large cohort of patients enrolled in the study between January 2009 and June 2017. 1920 patients were enrolled from 63 centers in France, Germany, Greece and Italy, For 147 of the 600 HU-naive patients (never treated with HU before enrolment) and started on HU for VOC or ACS, there was documented clinical outcome (number of VOC >48h and ACS episodes per year) over a 4-year follow-up period. These patients were selected for analysis to evaluate sustainability of clinical and hematological HU response in routine practice. Demographic data and Hb genotypes are displayed in table 1. The children group was mainly composed of βS/βS patients, while adults were mainly βS/βS and βS/β-thal patients. As shown in figure 1 and 2, there was a dramatic reduction in the number of VOC >48h and ACS episodes (-79%) from year 1 in adults and children, with results comparable to previous randomised clinical trials in adults (Charache et al., 1995) and children (Jain et al, 2012). Overall, the reduction in number of VOC (>48h) and ACS was stable over the 4 years of follow-up. This reduction is inversely proportional to the increase in HbF. There were however a moderate rebound in children from year 2 while adults remained stable. Similarly, there was reduction in the proportion of adults and children requiring transfusion (figure 3). The clinical benefit of HU was higher in severe forms of SCD, as displayed by the markedly reduced number of patients with ≥ 3 VOC episodes (>48h)/year at year 1 (figure 4). Hematological response to HU was evidenced as soon as year 1 with a marked increase in HbF% (+6-10) and were maintained over subsequent years of treatment (figure 1 and 2) as the dose of HU was further increased. While there was no striking differences in HbF% variation between age groups and genotypes, the requirement for increase in HU dose over the 4 years of follow-up was markedly higher in children, probably reflecting the different severity between the two population at entry (figure 5). The red cell red cell mean corpuscular volume (MCV) could be used as a measurement of compliance, showing differences between age group (figure 5). There was, as expected, an apparent negative correlation between induction of HbF synthesis and number of VOC >48h and ACS episodes at year 1, attesting to reduced effectiveness of treatment in some patients (figure 6). Improvement in blood parameters was accompanied by mild reduction of absolute neutrophil and platelet count although not to the point of myelosuppression (defined as ANC < 2 x 109/L), showing that MTD was not targeted in routine practice. Treatment-emergent adverse reactions occurring in the 147 patients of the cohort over the 4 years of follow-up were consistent with the known safety profile of hydroxyurea. The commonest effects included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (25 events in 13 patients) and were easily manageable with temporary discontinuation of treatment. No tumorigenesis was reported. In conclusion, preliminary results from ESCORT-HU in 147 patients treated with HU showed sustained hematological and clinical response while MTD was not targeted, with differences between adults and children which may be attributed in part to reduced compliance in the latter group. Disclosures Voskaridou: Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acceleron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Oevermann:Addmedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thuret:Addmedica: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Steschenko:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Nonmyeloablative Transplant for Sickle Cell Disease Does Not Lead to Kidney Dysfunction Post-HSCT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153230 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 984-984

Author(s):

Emily Limerick ◽

Santosh L. Saraf ◽

Neal Jeffries ◽

Farah O'Boyle ◽

Clarissa Diamantidis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Function ◽

Kidney Disease ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Disease ◽

Normal Range ◽

Kidney Dysfunction ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Matched Sibling

Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative therapy for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Though HSCT can reverse the SCD phenotype, both acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been associated with HSCT. SCD alters renal function thus the impact of HSCT on renal function in SCD patients is a critical area of exploration. Here, we report the effect of HSCT on renal function in people with SCD. This study analyzes data from 195 patients who received HLA-matched sibling or haploidentical HSCT for SCD at Imperial College London (ICL), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). The former is a pediatric cohort and all sites employed a nonmyeloablative conditioning. Patients' renal function was assessed at baseline and annually thereafter for up to 3-years. We examined the prevalence of CKD before and after HSCT, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) trends after HSCT, and the incidence of AKI within 100 days of HSCT. We defined and staged AKI according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria; we calculated eGFR with the CKD- epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation for adults and Bedside Schwartz for children. The median eGFR declined annually but remained within the normal range throughout the follow-up period: the baseline median eGFR was 138 ml/min/1.73m 2 and declined by 7 in the first year of follow-up and by additional decreases of 5 and 3.6 ml/min/1.73m 2 in subsequent years (p-values of 0.07, 0.0002, and 0.0002 for years 1, 2, and 3 for comparison to baseline from regression model of eGFR). No differences in eGFR were seen for covariates in the model: haploidentical vs. matched sibling, engraftment status, gender, or site. The downward eGFR trend may represent an improvement in renal function toward normal as hyperfiltration (eGFR ≥150 ml/min/1.73m 2) was present in 28% of patients at baseline and steadily declined to 7% by 3 years post-HSCT. There was a corresponding increase in patients with normal eGFR (60-149 ml/min/1.73m 2) from 59% at baseline to 88% at 3 years post-HSCT. Among the ICL and NIH cohorts (UIC excluded due to use of a different AKI determination strategy), 58% of patients developed AKI in the early post-HSCT period. 67% of AKI cases were mild, stage 1; 25% were moderate, stage 2; and 8% were severe, stage 3 AKI. This study demonstrates that HSCT in patients with SCD is associated with a transient increase in UACR but not associated with a significant increase in CKD prevalence by 3-years post-HSCT. The stability of UACR compared to baseline by the 3-year time point suggests that even more mild renal damage may stabilize after HSCT. While there is a substantial decline in eGFR from baseline to each annual follow-up, the proportion of patients whose eGFR was in the normal range increased as the prevalence of hyperfiltration decreased. Finally, while AKI occurred in more than half the patients in our cohort, the preponderance developed only mild AKI. Therefore, our data indicate that nonmyeloablative HSCT for SCD does not lead to significant kidney dysfunction post-HSCT. Disclosures Saraf: Pfizer: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Diamantidis: United Health Group: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Children in the United States with Sickle Cell Disease Experience Greater Educational Burden Than Those Living in Low/Middle Income and Other High-Income Countries

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146566 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3106-3106

Author(s):

Fuad El Rassi ◽

John James ◽

Biree Andemariam ◽

Beverley Francis-Gibson ◽

Caterina P Minniti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sickle Cell Disease ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Sickle Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Disease ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Middle Income ◽

Global Impact ◽

The Us

Abstract Introduction: The Sickle Cell World Assessment Survey (SWAY) was a cross-sectional survey to assess the global impact and treatment of sickle cell disease (SCD). Complications of SCD can lead to significant negative effects on patient (pt) quality of life. Recurrent vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) are one of the most common SCD complications and can lead to poor quality of life and chronic organ damage. SCD manifestations can start as early as the first year of life. The implications of SCD on a child's life can be far reaching and may affect education, the global impact of which has not been well described. Here, we assess data from SWAY to better understand the impact of SCD on education among pediatric pts in the US vs other high-income countries (HIC) and low/middle-income countries (LMIC). Methods: SWAY included individuals aged ≥6 years with a diagnosis of SCD. The survey was completed by proxy (parent/caregiver/guardian) for pts aged 6-11 years and could be optionally self-completed by pts aged ≥12 years. The survey consisted of 7 ratings-based (Likert scale) questions focused on education, where a score of 5, 6, or 7 indicated increasing levels of agreement. Pediatric pts were defined as those aged <18 years. Per the World Bank definition, HIC were defined as having a gross national income per capita of ≥US$12,536; LMIC represented all remaining countries. SWAY was not designed to assess treatment outcomes; all analyses are descriptive. Age groups were not matched, and pts were not followed up over time. Results: Among the 769 pediatric pts participating in SWAY, there were 77 US respondents to the educational survey (mean age, 12 y), 200 HIC respondents (mean age, 13 y), and 492 LMIC respondents (mean age, 12 y, [one respondent did not provide an age]). Pediatric pts in all groups reported that SCD adversely impacted their education. Of the US respondents, 51%, 45%, and 52% agreed that SCD negatively impacted performance on school tests, overall performance at school, and school attendance, respectively. This was a higher rate of agreement for these statements than that reported by pediatric pts from other HIC (25%, 23%, 36%) and LMIC (37%, 41%, 50%). The US respondents also agreed that SCD negatively affected performance on homework (45%), caused them to repeat a year or class (42%), lowered interest in school (36%), and limited educational progression (35%). Again, this was a higher rate of agreement than that reported by pediatric pts from other HIC (26%, 14%, 19%, 20%) and LMIC (37%, 32%, 34%, 29%). Interestingly, the largest differences in reported school impact occurred between the US and HIC, where the US respondents showed nearly two-fold higher agreement for all statements except for reduced attendance. Conversely, there were only minor differences between respondents from the US and LMIC. Full results are presented in the Figure. Conclusions: A higher proportion of pediatric pts in the US reported a negative impact of SCD on schooling compared with those in HIC and LMIC. These results were unexpected but align strongly with the emerging evidence that social determinants prevalent in the US lends itself away from the benefits of living in a resource-rich nation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures James: GBT: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Francis-Gibson: Global Alliance of SCD Organizations: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sickle Cell Disease Association of America: Current Employment; Alliance for Regenerative Medicine Foundation for Cell and Gene Medicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ASH: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Minniti: GBT: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Paulose: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Current Employment. Bailey: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Other: I am an employee of Adelphi Real World, which received payment from Novartis Pharmaceuticals for this research. Rajkovic-Hooley: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Other: I am an employee of Adelphi Real World, which received payment from Novartis Pharmaceuticals for this research. Osunkwo: Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Health and Services Administration: Research Funding; Patient Centered Outcomes Research Instituted: Research Funding; Micella Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Chiesi: Consultancy; Emmaus: Consultancy; Cyclerion: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Terumo: Consultancy.

Download Full-text