Comparison of Patient Outcomes with Two Different Formulations of Melphalan As Conditioning Chemotherapy for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Introduction: High-dose melphalan is the standard conditioning chemotherapy for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM). However, patients experience several side effects and toxicities from high-dose melphalan. In 2016, United States Food and Drug Administration approved Evomela, a propylene glycol-free formulation of melphalan, as conditioning chemotherapy for ASCT in MM. This was based on its bioequivalence to the standard propylene-glycol solubilized melphalan formulation (Alkeran) in a phase 2 study. Evomela has the advantages of improved solubility, stability, bioavailability and being free of propylene glycol that is associated with organ dysfunction. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who received ASCT with high dose chemotherapy using alkeran (n=255) or evomela (n=259) at our institution to compare their outcomes such as side effects, duration of cytopenias, transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay, readmission within 30 days and progression-free survival (PFS) post-SCT. Clinical and demographic characteristics were compared between two treatment regimens using the Chi-square test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for the continuous variables. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of transplant to death, censoring the alive patients at their last follow up date. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the date of transplant to date of relapse or death, whichever occurred first, censoring at the last follow-up if no relapse or death. OS and PFS estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: The baseline patient characteristics such as age, ISS stage, comorbidity index and number of prior lines of therapy prior to ASCT were similar between the two groups. (See table 1). Mucositis was seen in 77.2% of the patients who received Alkeran compared to 69.5% who received Evomela (p=<0.001). Incidence of febrile neutropenia was 65.9% in the Alkeran group and 49.4% in the Evomela group (p=0.0002). Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting were reported in 98.8% and 93.4% of the patients in the Alkeran and Evomela groups respectively (p=0.001). Rates of diarrhea and clostridium difficile infection were similar with the two drugs. Time to neutrophil engraftment was the same in both the groups while duration of thrombocytopenia (platelets <20k) was slightly longer in the Evomela group (6 days in alkeran and 8 days in evomela group, p=<0.001). Red cell transfusion requirement was higher with the use of Alkeran compared to Evomela (42.3% vs 21.8%, p=0.001) while platelet transfusion was the same. There was no difference in the duration of hospital stay between the two groups. However, rate of readmission within 30 days of discharge was higher in patients who got Evomela compared to Alkeran (9.4% versus 17.4%, p=0.008). Day +100 serological response (very good partial response or better), PFS post-SCT and OS were similar in both groups. (Figure 1). Conclusion: We conclude that use of Evomela is associated with a better side-effect profile and transfusion requirement while having similar outcomes as Alkeran. Disclosures Yucebay: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioXCell: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; G1 Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chaudhry:Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Efebera:Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ohio State University: Current Employment. Bumma:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Khan:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Devarakonda:Janssen: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Consolidation Followed By Maintenance Therapy Versus Maintenance Alone in Newly Diagnosed, Transplant Eligible Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM): A Randomized Phase 3 Study of the European Myeloma Network (EMN02/HO95 MM Trial)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.242.242 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 242-242 ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Meral Beksac ◽

Bronno van der Holt ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Angelo Michele Carella ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Primary Study ◽

High Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Background The role of up-front consolidation for newly diagnosed, transplant eligible MM (NDMM) patients (pts) has not yet been prospectively addressed in the novel agents era. Methods The EMN02/HO95 trial was designed to randomly (R) compare (R1) 4 cycles of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) vs high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), either single or double, as intensification therapy after induction with bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCD) (M Cavo et al, ASCO 2016, abstract #8000). A second randomization to consolidation therapy with 2 cycles of VRD vs no consolidation (R2) was performed after intensification, to be followed by lenalidomide maintenance (lenalidomide 10 mg continuously) until progression or toxicity in both arms. (VRD: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously days 1, 4, 8, 11; lenalidomide 25 mg orally days 1 - 21; dexamethasone 20 mg orally days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 of a 28 days cycle). Primary study end points were progression-free survival (PFS) from R1 and PFS from R2. A first planned interim analysis for R2 was performed in July 2016 when at least 33% (= 172) of the required events for PFS had been observed. Results From February 2011 to April 2014, 1510 pts aged ≤ 65 years with symptomatic MM were enrolled, of whom 1499 were eligible. Of these, 1211 were randomized (stratification by ISS stage) to VMP (505 pts) or HDM (1 or 2 ASCT) (706 pts). For R2 903 eligible patients were randomized to consolidation (459 pts) or no consolidation (444 pts). Median follow up from R2 was 25 months (maximum 53). Response status at time of R2 was ≥ CR (23%), ≥ VGPR (67%), ≥ PR (93%), and will be updated for status at start of maintenance. At the time of analysis, 258 events for PFS after R2 had been reported. 3-year. PFS from R2 was 62% in all patients, i.e., 60% without consolidation and 65% in patients with consolidation, and median PFS had not yet been reached. PFS from R2 with adjustment for R1 was prolonged in pts randomized to VRD (HR=0.78; 95% CI=0.61-1.00; P=0.045), a benefit retained across predefined subgroups with revised ISS stage III (HR=0.67; P=0.26) and in patients randomized in R1 to VMP (HR=0.76; P=0.19) and to HDM (HR=0.79; P=0.13). The benefit of consolidation was observed in patients with low-risk cytogenetics (HR=0.68; P=0.03), but not in patients with high-risk cytogenetics (del(17p) and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16); HR=1.03; P=0.91). At 3 years OS from R2 was 86% and 87%, respectively. Toxicity from VRD was limited with 5% CTCAE grade 4, mainly hematological. Conclusions Consolidation treatment with VRD followed by Lenalidomide maintenance until progression or toxicity shows promising results as compared to maintenance alone for younger NDMM pts, but further study follow-up is needed. This trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl as NTR 2528, EudraCT 2009-017903-28 This trial was supported by unrestricted grants from Celgene and Janssen. Disclosures Sonneveld: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Carella:Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Ludwig:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Driessen:janssen: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; Mundipharma-EDO: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gay:Celgene: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board. Mellqvist:Mundipharma: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zweegman:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schjesvold:Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Palumbo:Takeda: Employment, Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Cavo:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

High-Dose Melphalan in 1 Day Versus over 2 Days Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation As Consolidation Treatment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147860 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3944-3944

Author(s):

Mesire Aydin ◽

Man Wai Tang ◽

Marielle Wondergem ◽

David C. de Leeuw ◽

Jurgen J. Wegman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Consolidation Treatment ◽

Cell Counts ◽

High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Background High-dose melphalan (HDM) at 200 mg/m2 is a myeloablative consolidation treatment prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and is administered in 1-day or divided over 2-days. Although the 1-day regimen (lower AUC) has been shown to result in significantly less gastro-intestinal toxicity, it is not completely clear whether this administration strategy has any deleterious effects on efficacy, compared to the 2-day regimen. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of 1- or 2-day dosing of HDM on disease remission, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with MM. Methods Data from two academic centers in Amsterdam that have recently merged were used for the analysis, with one of the centers using the 1-day regimen and the other the 2-days regimen. A total of 265 patients with MM divided over the 1-day group (n=174) and 2-day group (n=91) treated between July 2017 and February 2020, were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with at least very good partial remission (≥VGPR) at day ±90 post-ASCT. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of hospitalization post-ASCT, engraftment period of neutrophils and platelets, and complications (other than mucositis) during hospitalization. Results Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Remission status of ≥VGPR was comparable between the 1-day and 2-day groups (84% vs. 80% respectively). After a median follow-up of 21 months, OS (92% vs. 91%) and PFS (80% vs. 81%) were comparable in the 1-day and 2-day group respectively. There were no differences in the incidence of hematologic adverse events between the 1-day and 2-day groups (neutropenia; 98% vs. 100%, thrombocytopenia; 90% vs. 96% respectively). Median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC >0.5 x10 9 L -1) was significantly shorter in the 2-day group than in the 1-day group (14 days vs. 18 days, p = 0.002). Median time to platelet engraftment (platelets >20 x10 9 L -1) was comparable between the groups. Lower CD34+ cell counts were administered in the 1-day group compared to the 2-day group (2.6 vs. 3.4 x10 6/kg, p <0.0001). A significant negative correlation between the reinfused CD34+ cell counts and time to neutrophil engraftment was found (R= - 0.244). Table 2 shows the number of hospitalization days after ASCT. The median number was 18 days in the 1-day group and 15 days in the 2-day group (OR 1.22, 95% C.I. (1.10-1.35), p <0.0001). Incidences of infectious complications, febrile neutropenia and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions were not different between the groups. Conclusion The use of 1-day HDM as consolidation treatment in MM patients resulted in equal disease response, progression-free survival and overall survival as compared to 2-day HDM. Based on the results of this study showing comparable efficacy and earlier findings of reduced toxicity with the 1-day HDM administration, we recommend the 1-day protocol for HDM. Interestingly, our results also confirmed that patients might benefit from higher counts of reinfused CD34+/enucleated cells. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wondergem: Novartis: Honoraria. de Leeuw: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Biemond: Sanquin: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. van de Donk: Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellectis: Research Funding. Zweegman: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nur: Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax-Based Treatment in Elderly CLL Patients: A Retrospective Study from the Filo Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149640 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3747-3747

Author(s):

Charlotte Doublet ◽

Marie-Sarah Dilhuydy ◽

Emmanuelle Ferrant ◽

Pierre Feugier ◽

Alexandra Fayault ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Oncology Nurses ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Daily Dose ◽

History Of

Abstract Median age at diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia is 72 years. However, only few patients over 80 years of age are included in clinical trials, even in those devoted to unfit patients. In order to evaluate both efficiency and safety of venetoclax in this category of patients, we conducted a multicentric retrospective study and collected data from 77 CLL patients from 19 FILO centers who started venetoclax after 80 years of age. Median age at venetoclax initiation was 86 years old (81-97). 63% of patients had a history of heart disease, 62% had renal failure (moderate 59% and severe 3%) and 29% had a history of severe infections. Despite their comorbidities and a CIRS greater than 6 in 70% of cases, their autonomy was preserved with a median performans status of 1 (0-4). In this comorbid geriatric population, pretherapeutic geriatric assessment was only performed in a single patient. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (0-6) with an exposure to a BCR inhibitor in 56% of cases. 11q and 17p deletion were found in 39% and 30% of cases respectively, 39% of patients had a complex karyotype and 30% harbored a TP53 mutation. However, in this real life population, these prognostic factors were only performed in half of patients. IGHV mutational status was only available in 11 patients, and 83% of them had unmutated IGHV. At the time of venetoclax initiation, the tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) risk was moderate in 57% of cases and high in 8% of cases. Venetoclax was administered as a single agent (42%) or in association with rituximab (58%). In total, half of the patients were hospitalized at each dose ramp-up, and only 3 patients were treated on outpatient basis. 82% of the cohort was able to reach the daily dose of 400mg. Half of the patients were included in a phone call monitoring program with oncology nurses to pre-emptively manage side effects and foster therapy adherence. The safety study reported 14% of TLS, with 2 discontinuations of treatment within the first month: one of which led to dialysis and the other to death. As in the previously published studies, 25% of patients had infectious complications, and grade 3 haematological and digestive toxicities were reported in 42% and 22% of cases, respectively. The reduction of the daily dose of venetoclax was necessary for 33%. Permanent discontinuation of venetoclax occurred in 40% of subjects, including 29% of early withdrawal (within the first 3 months). Main reasons for discontinuation were intolerance (21%), CLL progression (21%), death (21%) and scheduled treatment discontinuation (10%). The overall response rate was 86%, consisting of 49% of complete response (unconfirmed by bone marrow biopsy) and 37% of partial response. With a median follow-up of 21months, estimated progression free survival and overall survival were 29 and 38 months respectively. Prior exposure to a BCR inhibitor had no impact on progression free survival. To conclude, venetoclax has a manageable safety profile in elderly patients with comorbidities and can induce prolonged responses. Finally, if additional follow-up by oncology nurses seems to be more and more implemented, the pre-therapeutic onco-geriatric evaluation remains underexploited in this population. Disclosures Ferrant: AstraZeneca: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Janssen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Feugier: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Laribi: AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding. Tchernonog: JANSSEN: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; ASTRAZENECA: Consultancy. Dartigeas: Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress. Quinquenel: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Daratumumab, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Alone for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Among Patients with 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Based on Previous Treatment Exposure: Updated Analysis of Pollux

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.489.489 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 489-489 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Philippe Moreau ◽

Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽

Heather J. Sutherland ◽

Marc Lalancette ◽

Hila Magen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Previous Treatment ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Introduction: Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 IgGκ monoclonal antibody that has been combined successfully with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. The combination of daratumumab with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) has been compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (Rd) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in a randomized phase 3 study (Dimopoulos MA, et al. N Engl J Med 2016; in press). In a pre-specified interim analysis, the DRd combination demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) in addition to deep and durable responses compared with the Rd arm. We performed subgroup analyses to further examine these efficacy data according to prior treatment exposure. Methods: Pts who received ≥1 prior line of therapy were randomized (1:1) to Rd (lenalidomide: 25 mg PO on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle; dexamethasone: 40 mg PO weekly) with or without daratumumab (16 mg/kg IV qw for 8 weeks, q2w for 16 weeks, then q4w until progression). The primary endpoint was PFS. Pts who were refractory to lenalidomide were not eligible. All analyses were performed in pts who received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy. Results: Median follow-up was 13.5 months. Pts who were lenalidomide-naive prior to the start of study treatment (DRd, n=226; Rd, n=219) demonstrated significantly longer PFS with DRd vs Rd (median: not reached [NR] vs 18.4 months; HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.52; P<0.0001), with estimated 12-month PFS rates of 83.0% vs 59.9%, respectively. ORR was significantly higher with DRd vs Rd (96% vs 79%), with ≥VGPR rates of 76% vs 47% and ≥CR rates of 44% vs 21%, respectively (P<0.0001 for all). In the lenalidomide-exposed subgroup (DRd, n=46; Rd, n=45), median PFS was NR in both treatment groups (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.22-1.12; P=0.0826); estimated 12-month PFS rates were 84.1% vs 63.1%, respectively. ORR was higher with DRd vs Rd but did not reach statistical significance (87% vs 71%; P=0.0729); however, rates of ≥VGPR (78% vs 38%; P=0.0001) and ≥CR (44% vs 12%; P=0.0011) were significantly improved with DRd vs Rd, respectively. For bortezomib-naive pts (DRd, n=44; Rd, n=45), PFS was significantly longer with DRd vs Rd (median: NR vs 15.8 months; HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.86; P=0.0170), with estimated 12-month PFS rates of 85.4% vs 69.2%, respectively. ORR was significantly higher with DRd vs Rd (98% vs 82%; P=0.0158), with trends toward increased rates of ≥VGPR (74% vs 55%; P=0.0544) and ≥CR (42% vs 23%; P=0.0576). In the bortezomib-exposed pts (DRd, n=228; Rd, n=219), median PFS was NR in DRd vs 18.4 months in Rd (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.50 P<0.0001); estimated 12-month PFS rates were 82.8% vs 58.7%, respectively. Significant differences in ORR (93% vs 77%), rate of ≥VGPR (77% vs 43%) and rate of ≥CR (44% vs 19%) were observed with DRd vs Rd, respectively (P<0.0001 for all). Among bortezomib-refractory patients (DRd, n=54; Rd, n=49), the PFS benefit of DRd compared with Rd was maintained (median: NR vs 10.3 mo, respectively; HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.85; P=0.0117; Figure). The estimated 12-month PFS rates were 70.8% vs 44.4%, respectively. Similar to bortezomib-exposed pts, ORR (92% vs 68%; P=0.0024), rate of ≥VGPR (75% vs 36%; P=0.0001), and rate of ≥CR (46% vs 13%; P=0.0003) were all significantly higher with DRd vs Rd for bortezomib-refractory pts. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Among pts who received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy, significantly longer PFS and higher ORR were observed with DRd vs Rd among pts who previously received bortezomib or were refractory to bortezomib or were lenalidomide-naive. Higher rates of deeper responses were observed in pts who previously received lenalidomide or bortezomib. Follow-up is ongoing to assess PFS in pts who received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy and previously received lenalidomide. These results further strengthen the significant benefit of combining daratumumab with Rd for RRMM. Figure Progression-free Survival in Bortezomib-refractory Patients who Received 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Figure. Progression-free Survival in Bortezomib-refractory Patients who Received 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Disclosures Moreau: Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Kaufman:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sutherland:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lalancette:Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Iida:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Prince:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Cochrane:BMS: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings; Novartis: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings; Celgene: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings; Takeda: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings. Khokhar:Janssen: Employment. Guckert:Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership; Janssen: Employment. Qin:Janssen: Employment. Oriol:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Updated 6 Year Follow-Up Of The PRIMA Study Confirms The Benefit Of 2-Year Rituximab Maintenance In Follicular Lymphoma Patients Responding To Frontline Immunochemotherapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.509.509 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 509-509 ◽

Cited By ~ 56

Author(s):

Gilles Andre Salles ◽

John Francis Seymour ◽

Pierre Feugier ◽

Fritz Offner ◽

Armando Lopez-Guillermo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Second Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Rituximab Maintenance ◽

Line Therapy

Abstract The intergroup PRIMA Phase III study was designed to investigate the potential benefit of 2-years of rituximab maintenance in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) responding to one of three non-randomised first line immunochemotherapy treatments. The results of the final analysis with 36 months follow-up (Salles et al., Lancet 2011) demonstrated a significant reduction of the risk of progression or death with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.55 in favour of patients randomized to rituximab maintenance. We present here the updated results with 3 additional years of follow-up. From December 2004 until April 2007, 1217 patients were enrolled from 223 centres and complete data were available for 1193 patients who had the following pre-induction treatment characteristics: median age 56 years [range 22–87]; 52% male; 90% Ann Arbor stage III-IV; 33% B symptoms; 56% bone marrow involvement; 4% ECOG performance status >1; 34% elevated LDH; 32% β2-microglobulin >3mg/L; FLIPI score 0-1 (21%), FLIPI 2 (36%), FLIPI 3-5 (43%). Most patients (75%) received R-CHOP induction (22% R-CVP, 3% R-FCM). Patients responding to induction therapy were stratified based on their immunochemotherapy regimen and response [CR/CRu versus PR] and randomized to observation or rituximab maintenance, 1 infusion (375 mg/m2) every 8 weeks for 2 years. A total of 1018 randomised patients were analyzed according to the ITT principle (513 observation / 505 rituximab maintenance). All initial pre-treatment characteristics were well balanced between arms and the response status at time of randomization was CR=39%; CRu=32% and PR=28% (others 1%). With a median follow-up of 73 months from randomization, 6-year progression free survival estimate was 42.7% (95% CI 38 – 46.9%) in the observation arm (284 events, median=48 months) and 59.2% (95% CI 54.7 – 63.7%) in the rituximab maintenance arm (194 events, median not reached), respectively (stratified Log-Rank, P<. 0001; HR = 0.58 ; 95% CI 0.48 - 0.69). In pre-planned analyses of patients subgroups categorized by age, sex, FLIPI score category, induction chemotherapy and response to induction, the effect of rituximab maintenance was examined and found to be consistent among these different subgroups. In a Cox regression multivariate analysis, rituximab maintenance (HR=0.57; P<.0001) as well as older age (HR=0.79; P=.015), female sex (HR=0.72; P=.0003) and low or intermediate FLIPI groups (HR=0.67; P<.0001) were all significant variables associated with superior progression free survival. A significant reduction in the risk of starting a new anti-lymphoma treatment (HR=0.63, 95% CI 0.52 - 0.76) or starting a new chemotherapy (HR=0.70, 95% CI 0.57 - 0.86) were also observed for rituximab maintenance. The rate of histological transformation did not appear to differ between the 2 treatment arms: in the observation arm, transformation was documented in 24 patients (114 cases with morphological documentation out of 278 progressions) versus 16 patients in the rituximab maintenance arm (80 out of 186) respectively. Overall response rate to second-line therapy was reported by investigators to be 180/227 (79%) in patients from the observation arm (CR/CRu=61%; PR=19%) versus 109/144 (76%) in patients from the rituximab maintenance arm (CR/CRu =51%; PR=22%) (P=NS). At the time of the data cut-off, overall survival (OS) remains favourable in both study arms: 58 patients (11.3%) have died in the observation arm (6-years OS estimate 88.7%) compared to 59 patients (11.7%) in the rituximab maintenance arm (6-year OS estimate 87,4%). Main causes documented for death in the observation and rituximab maintenance arm respectively were lymphoma (28 ; 28), other malignancy (19 ; 5) and infections (4 ; 7). No new significant safety data were captured with this additional follow-up period. In conclusion, with 3 additional years of follow-up, these data demonstrate a sustained and persistent benefit of 2 years of rituximab maintenance therapy after immunochemotherapy, resulting in improved progression free survival. No additional or unexpected long term toxicities were observed and second line therapy efficacy results did not significantly differ between the 2 study arms. Overall survival appears very favourable for these randomized patients. Disclosures: Salles: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, Travel support Other; Genetech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feugier:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Offner:Lilly: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lopez-Guillermo:Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Belada:Roche: Consultancy. Catalano:Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Haioun:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Simpson:Janssen Research & Development: Honoraria. Leppa:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel support Other. Soubeyran:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hagenbeek:Takeda/Millennium: Consultancy. Casasnovas:ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Coiffier:Millennium Pharmaceuticals : Consultancy. Tilly:Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Progression-Free Survival Outcomes By Response Status for Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone with or without Daratumumab in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Pooled Subgroup Analysis of Octans and Alcyone

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148937 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1648-1648

Author(s):

Jianxiang Wang ◽

Weijun Fu ◽

Soo-Mee Bang ◽

Honghui Huang ◽

Kihyun Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Primary Analysis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Once Daily ◽

Free Survival ◽

Asian Patients

Abstract Introduction: Daratumumab is a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody that targets CD38 with a direct on-tumor and immunomodulatory mechanism of action. In the primary analysis (median follow-up, 16.5 months) of the global phase 3 ALCYONE trial, daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (D-VMP) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus VMP alone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who were ineligible for transplant (median PFS, not reached vs 18.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.65; P<0.001). In the primary analysis (median follow-up, 12.3 months) of the phase 3 OCTANS trial, D-VMP significantly prolonged PFS versus VMP in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with NDMM (median PFS, not reached vs 18.2 months; HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.77; P=0.0033). Here, we present a pooled subgroup analysis of PFS stratified by best response in Asian and global patients from the OCTANS and ALCYONE studies, respectively. Methods: Eligible patients in OCTANS and ALCYONE were ≥18 years of age, were diagnosed with NDMM, and were not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant due to age (≥65 years) or comorbidities. All patients received up to 9 cycles (42-days) of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m 2; subcutaneous) twice weekly on Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5 of Cycle 1 and once weekly on Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5 of Cycles 2 to 9; melphalan (9 mg/m 2; oral) once daily on Days 1 to 4 of each cycle; prednisone (60 mg/m 2; oral) once daily on Days 1 to 4 of each cycle. For patients in the D-VMP group, daratumumab (16 mg/kg, intravenous) was administered once weekly in Cycle 1, once every 3 weeks in Cycles 2 to 9, and once every 4 weeks thereafter until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response over time (at 6, 12, 18, 24, 54 weeks) and disease progression were assessed by a validated computer algorithm in accordance with the IMWG criteria. Minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10 -5) was assessed by multi-parameter flow cytometry in OCTANS and by next-generation sequencing in ALCYONE. Results: In the OCTANS study, 220 Asian patients were randomized (D-VMP, n=146; VMP, n=74); in the ALCYONE study, 706 global patients were randomized (D-VMP, n=350; VMP, n=356). Median age in OCTANS was 69 (range, 57-84) years and 71 (range 40-93) years in ALCYONE. Patients were pooled from both studies (D-VMP, n=496; VMP, n=430). D-VMP increased the rate of complete response or better (≥CR; 10.2% vs 5.6%) and the rate of very good partial response or better (≥VGPR; 58.5% vs 38.1%) versus VMP after 18 weeks of treatment (Figure A). Responses deepened over time among patients in both the D-VMP and VMP groups, as shown by the ≥CR rate (D-VMP, 38.8%; VMP, 21.6%) and the ≥VGPR rate (D-VMP, 74.0%; VMP, 50.7%) at 54 weeks. At a median follow-up of 12.3 months for OCTANS and 16.5 months for ALCYONE, among patients who achieved a VGPR (D-VMP: n=145 [29.2%]; VMP: n=109 [25.3%]), the median PFS was not reached in the D-VMP group versus 19.9 months in the VMP group (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.36-1.00; P=0.0499; Figure B). All patients who achieved ≥CR with or without MRD negativity (10 -5) demonstrated prolonged PFS, regardless of treatment (≥CR: HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.65-3.65; P=0.3210; ≥CR+MRD negativity: HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.13-3.40; P=0.6225; Figure B); however, more patients treated with D-VMP achieved this level of response (≥CR: D-VMP , n=212 [42.7%]; VMP, n=100 [23.3%]; ≥CR+MRD negativity: D-VMP, n=116 [23.4%]; VMP, n=27 [6.3%]; Figure B). Conclusion: In a pooled analysis of OCTANS and ALCYONE, more patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM achieved deeper responses with D-VMP versus VMP. More patients treated with D-VMP achieved ≥CR with or without MRD negativity compared with those treated with VMP alone, leading to prolonged PFS regardless of treatment. These results support the use of daratumumab in addition to VMP in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with NDMM. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: AbbVie: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Research Funding. Kim: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Li: Suzhou Zelgen Biopharmaceuticals Co.,Ltd.: Honoraria. Chim: Janssen, Takeda & Amgen: Other: received sponsorship for overseas meetings. Rodriguez-Otero: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene-BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Regeneron: Honoraria; Clínica Universidad de Navarra: Current Employment. Liberati: abbvie, amgen, archigen, beigene, BMS, celgene, DR REDDY'S LABORATORIES SPA, fibrogen, glaxo, Janssen, Karyopharm, Morphosys, Novartis, Onconova, Oncopeptides ab, Roche, Sanophi, Secura Bio, Takeda, Verastem,: Research Funding. Takamatsu: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; SRL: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies, Eisai: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Dimopoulos: BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Wroblewski: Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Carson: Janssen: Current Employment. Qi: Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wang: Janssen: Current Employment. Song: Janssen: Current Employment. Jia: Janssen: Current Employment. Yang: Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Liu: Janssen: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Li: Janssen: Current Employment. Zhang: Janssen: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Presence of Chip-Mutated Autologous Hematopoietic Cells in Mobilized Peripheral Blood Products Is Associated with Shorter Progression-Free Survival after Autologous Transplants for Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127335 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 515-515

Author(s):

Ehsan Malek ◽

Petra Martin ◽

Paolo F Caimi ◽

Benjamin K. Tomlinson ◽

Michael Caldwell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Hematopoietic Cell ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Whole Exome ◽

High Risk Disease

Multiple Myeloma (MM) remains a cancer of terminally-differentiated plasma cells that reside predominantly within the bone marrow. Malignant plasma cells are nurtured by a permissive microenvironment that favors tumor progression, drug resistance and disease relapse. Recurrent somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem cells, the source of major components in bone marrow niche, lead to age-associated clonal hematopoiesis of indetermined potential (CHIP) and has been associated with inferior survivals among individuals without malignant hematologic disorders. It is possible that these mutations in non-MM cells would affect remission time after transplant. We performed whole exome sequencing to identify CHIP-associated mutations within the autograft utilized to rescue hematopoiesis after high dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). We then correlated the presence of CHIP with the outcome of MM patients (pts) following autologous HCT. Methods. MM pts (N=101) that underwent HCT between 2006 and 2017 were studied. DNA was extracted from 1 ml of cryopreserved mobilized hematopoietic cell product. Targeted sequencing was then performed using Tempus xE whole exome platform (Tempus, Chicago, IL) with variable allele frequency (VAF) ≥0.1. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were defined as the time from transplantation until event of interest, with censoring at time of last follow up. Cox regression was used for time-to-event outcomes; hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. P-values were two-sided and those <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results. The median age was 60.1 years at the time of HCT. 58 pts were male and 43 female; 29 pts were African-American, 1 Asian/Indian and 71 were Caucasian. Seventy five (75%) and 42 (43%) pts had prior exposure to lenalidomide or cyclophosphamide, respectively. Thirty two pts (32%) underwent hematopoietic cell mobilization with GCS-F and plerixafor, 38 pts (38%) with cyclophosphamide and 31 pts (31%) with GCS-F alone. Forty seven pts (47%) had at least one CHIP-associated mutation. The median number of CD34+ yield in the first day was 6.7 x 10e6/kg for pts with CHIP mutations and 5.64 x 10e6/kg for pts without any CHIP mutation (p = 0.4). The presence or absence of CHIP mutations did not impact the yield of CD34+ stem cells collected (Fig. 1). The majority of mutations were either missense variants or mRNA splicing variations (Fig. 2), most commonly SF3B1, ASXL1, TET2 and ASXL2. CHIP mutations were associated with increased age (p= 0.021), but there was no association with prior history of previous cancer, smoking, cytogenetically-defined high risk disease, pre-HCT hemoglobin level or red blood cell mean corpuscular volume. There was also no significant difference between the transplant course between the two groups in terms of neutrophil and platelet engraftment or length of hospital stay. Median follow up was 32 months. During follow up 3 pts develop MDS/AML (2 pts in the CHIP group and one in no CHIP group). Coronary artery disease was the cause of death in one patient in CHIP cohort versus none in the CHIP negative cohort. Myeloma progression was the major cause of death in CHIP and No CHIP cohorts (66% vs. 60%, p=0.48). Median PFS was 19 months in CHIP cohort vs. 39 months in No CHIP group (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92, p= 0.001). Median OS has not been reached in the No CHIP group while it was 56 months in CHIP group (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-1.04, P=0.09). In multivariate analysis, presence of CHIP remained a significant predictor of worse PFS after adjusting for age, maintenance therapy, high risk disease, performance status, triplet vs. doublet pre-SCT therapy, melphalan dose and MM genetic risk. (Table 2). Conclusion: Here we showed high frequency of large clonal hematopoiesis clones (i.e., VAF ≥0.1) in autograft of MM pts. The presence of this mutations does not impact stem cell yield or transplant course, however it impacts PFS independent of age and other unfavorable factors. Our data highlights high frequency of SF3B1; the role of this mutant in modulating apoptotic factors in myeloma microenvironment should be investigated. Disclosures Malek: Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Adaptive: Consultancy; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Medpacto: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Caimi:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Fate Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Caldwell:Tempus Inc.: Employment.

Download Full-text

High-Dose Melphalan Significantly Increases Mutational Burden in Multiple Myeloma Cells at Relapse: Results from a Randomized Study in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139014 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4-5

Author(s):

Mehmet K. Samur ◽

Marco Roncador ◽

Anil Aktas-Samur ◽

Mariateresa Fulciniti ◽

Abdul Hamid Bazarbachi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

High Dose ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Private Company ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

High Dose Melphalan ◽

New Mutations

We recently shown that high-dose melphalan (HDM) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) as first line therapy in young (<66 yrs) multiple myeloma (MM) patients significantly improves progression-free survival (IFM/DFCI 2009 study). However, the impact of alkylating agent melphalan inducing N-alkylpurine-monoadducts forming interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) in surviving myeloma cells remains an important biological question. We here profiled samples from the IFM/DFCI 2009 study, where patients were randomized to RVD+HDM vs RVD alone, to identify genomic changes induced by HDM and observed at relapse. We analyzed paired purified MM cells collected at diagnosis and at relapse from 68 patients using deep (75X) whole genome sequencing. Forty-five patients were treated with RVD only, while 23 patients received RVD followed by HDM. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in regard to disease characteristics including sex, age, cytogenetic risk, and best response. Median follow-up was similar (29 vs 31 months, respectively), removing longer follow up as a confounding variable. The number of mutations at diagnosis was similar on both arms (7137 [IQR=3742] vs. 7230 [IQR=3702], p value = 0.67). Although mutational load increased in both arms; there was a significantly higher increase in number of mutations and indels in the HDM arm compared to RVD alone (mutations 5686 vs 1745, p=1.4e-5; and indels 467 vs 360, p= 0.02, respectively). Using a model incorporating number of new mutations, depth, and purity, we found that HDM causes a 4.1 fold higher mutation accumulation rate per month than RVD only (158.3 vs 38.3 mutations/ month; p=0.003). Importantly, newly acquired mutations were localized to regions which overlap with transcribed regions, and accumulated at significantly higher rate in the HDM group (p=0.009). In contrast, we did not observe any significant changes in copy number alterations (CNAs) and structural variants, including translocations, between both arms. A significant change in frequency of driver mutations including RAS/RAF, FAM46C, TP53, and DIS3 was not observed at the time of relapse. Clonality level was increased only for KRAS (p=0.054), while all other specific driver genes had similar clonality level at diagnosis and relapse. Interestingly, a significant increase in mutations involving MYO16 and SLC7A8 genes was observed at relapse in both arms, implicating components of the induction regimen (RVD). Investigating the mutational signature utilization in only newly acquired mutations identified 4 signatures: APOBEC, HR Double Strand Repair, clock-like signature, and unknown. k-means clustering analysis of samples based on signature utilization showed four distinct clusters. All patients clustering with high DNA repair signature utilization were in the HDM arm (65% HDM patients), the majority of whom achieved CR or sCR (74%); these patients acquired 8308 (range 3302-19107) new mutations between diagnosis and relapse. None of the RVD only treated patients were in this cluster. The remaining 35% HDM group patients were clustered with RVD samples and showed unknown signature utilization. Furthermore, motif enrichment analysis identified CYWR and ATGAGATV (p < 1e-130) as enriched motifs around the new mutations in HDM compared to RVD cohort. Importantly and as expected, DNA damage repair pathway genes were frequently targeted in the HDM group: 72% HDM samples accumulated DDR gene mutations vs. only 17% in the RVD alone arm (p < 0.001). At the time of relapse, 100% HDM arm patients had at least one DDR gene mutation and 80% had two or more, while only 37% RVD only group had one or more such mutation. Finally, we have reconstructed phylogenetic and evolutionary trajectories based on mutation and copy-number data from samples at diagnosis and relapse. The clonal composition in both arms was similar at diagnosis; however, HDM caused a significant shift to more subclonal mutations at relapse. chromothripsis and chromoplexy events were detected in 30% patients at diagnosis, which remained constant at relapse regardless of treatment. In summary, we describe significant accumulation of mutations following high dose melphalan. This fundamental molecular change in the disease at relapse, suggests the need for reappraisal of the optimal use and sequencing of high dose melphalan in the era of novel agents. Disclosures Fulciniti: NIH: Research Funding. Richardson:Celgene/BMS, Oncopeptides, Takeda, Karyopharm: Research Funding. Thakurta:Oxford University: Other: visiting professor; Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Perrot:Amgen, BMS/Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Moreau:Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Anderson:Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics.: Other: Scientific Founder of Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics.; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium-Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Parmigiani:Phaeno Biotehnologies: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; CRA Health: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Foundation Medicine Institute: Consultancy; Delphi Diagnostics: Consultancy; BayesMendel Laboratory: Other: Co-lead. Munshi:Amgen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; C4: Current equity holder in private company; OncoPep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; BMS: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Interim or End of Treatment FGD-PET Complete Response Does Not Have Adequate Predictive Value in Mature T/NK Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1813.1813 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1813-1813

Author(s):

Tatyana Feldman ◽

Larysa Sanchez ◽

Patrick Toth ◽

David Panush ◽

Lori A Leslie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Research Funding ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction: Cure rate of Mature T/NK cell lymphoma (TCL) is rather low and multiple trials are being conducted to improve frontline therapy outcomes. Consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant is becoming widely used as a mean of improving survival (SCT). Based on data from several retrospective trials, pts who achieve CR may not benefit from consolidative SCT. There is no data available on the role of PET-CR as defined by using Deauville criteria (which became standard in response assessment of NHL (The Lugano Classification 2014)). We performed retrospective analysis of 59 pts with TCL examining the correlation between PFS/OS and iPET and eotPET. Methods: 59 pts newly diagnosed pts with TCL treated between 2008-2016 for whom interim and eotPET scan were available. It was our routine practice to obtain baseline, interim (after 3 cycles of chemotherapy) and eotPET. Pathology slides of outside cases were centrally evaluated by a hematopathologist to confirm diagnosis. Baseline, interim and eotPET were centrally reviewed by a nuclear medicine radiologist blinded to clinical outcomes who assigned Deauville score (DS) to every PET. Responses were recorded according to the Lugano classification 2014. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan Meier method was used to calculate the Progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS), two-sided Log-rank test was used to compare OS and PFS between PET groups. Results: Detailed demographic is presented in Table1. Median age at diagnosis is 59, sixty two percent males, 37% female; ALCL 34%, PTCLnos 22%, AITL 19%, and ATLL 10%; most of pts were advanced stage. Most common chemotherapy regimens used were CHOP/CHOEP, HCVAD, and CODOX, SMILE. Median follow up time for the entire cohort was 22.7mo. Forty nine percent of pts progressed and 29% of pts died during follow up. Cause of death for majority of pts was disease progression. Following Deauville scores were assigned on iPET and eotPET respectively: DS1 in 37% and 39%, DS2 in 30% and 35%, DS3 in 15% and 6%, DS4 in 9% and 4%, DS5 in 9% and 16%. We analyzed mPFS and mOS for PET-CR using DS1-2 or DS1-3 to define it. Sixty seven percent and 82% were considered in PET-CR on iPET based on DS 1-2 and DS 1-3 respectively. PET-CR went up to 77% and 83% respectively on eotPET. For final analysis, DS1-2 was used to define PET-CR as no statistically significant difference in mPFS and mOS was noted between DS1-2 and DS1-3. With median follow up of 22.7mo, two-year mPFS and mOS for the cohort were 50% and 74% respectively. Two- year mPFS for iPET-CR and eotPET-CR were 62%. Two-year mOS for iPET-CR and eotPET-CR were 86%% and 83%. Two-year mPFS for iPET-PR and eotPET-PR were 37% and 67%. Two-year mOS for iPET-PR and eotPET-PR were 70% and 100 % (not statistically significant difference with PET-CR mPFS and mOS). None of the pts with PD on iPET were alive at two year. Two-year mOS for eotPET-SD and eotPET-PD are 40%. Negative predictive value of iPET and eotPET is 61%, positive predictive value is 65% and 72% respectively. Conclusion: While PET-SD and PD is quite predictive of poor survivorship, significant number of PET-CR pts will relapse. Even though PET-CR rate to frontline therapy is high, it does not translate into durable responses for significant number of pts with TCL. Thus, PET-CR is not a sensitive enough measure to be considered as a predictor of long-term remission in TCL. It is important to develop response assessment tools which will correlate better with long term survivorship of TCL patients. Figure 1 Overall survival stratified on PET response Figure 1. Overall survival stratified on PET response Figure 2 Progression free survival stratified on PET response Figure 2. Progression free survival stratified on PET response Disclosures Feldman: Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Leslie:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Skarbnik:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Mato:Theradex: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; ProNAi: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Chow:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Protomastro:COTA: Employment. Leslie:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Goy:Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Writing support, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding; Infinity: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) Versus Oral Melphalan and High-Dose Dexamethasone In Patients with AL (Primary) Amyloidosis: Long Term Follow-up of the French Multicentric Randomized Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1344.1344 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1344-1344 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Arnaud Jaccard ◽

Veronique Leblond ◽

Bruno Royer ◽

Xavier Leleu ◽

Richard Delarue ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Survival ◽

Research Funding ◽

High Dose ◽

Event Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Landmark Analysis ◽

To Receive

Abstract Abstract 1344 In September 2007 we published the results of a prospective randomized trial comparing in 100 AL amyloidosis patients, enrolled between January 2000 and January 2005, high dose melphalan with ASCT and the oral regimen M-Dex (melphalan 10 mg per square meter of body-surface area and dexamethasone 40 mg per day, on days 1 to 4). With a median follow-up of 3 years the median survival was better in the M-Dex arm (56.9 months) than in the ASCT arm (22.2) months (p=0.04). The hematological responses were not statistically different between the 2 arms and the higher toxicity of the ASCT arm was responsible for the shorter median survival. This study has been criticised because of the high treatment related mortality (TRM) in the ASCT arm but a landmark analysis of patients who survived for at least 6 months and who received their assigned treatment, did not show any difference in survival. A second frequent criticism was that too severe patients, who were not able to go through the high dose procedure, have been included. A separate analysis done within the 59 good risk patients showed a nonsignificant difference between the two groups in overall survival at 3 years (58% in the group assigned to receive ASCT vs. 80% in the group assigned to receive M-Dex; P = 0.13). A third concern was related to the duration of response, should high dose treatment, giving slightly more complete responses, results in more sustained responses and, with a prolonged follow-up, in a better long term survival ? To answer this question we extended the follow-up of the surviving patients. The new cut off date was August 1st, 2010, more than 5 and a half years after the last inclusion. Only 1 patient has been lost to follow-up. We did again the landmark analysis with the longer follow-up and we looked, in this population of 65 patients with 100% feasibility and 0 % TRM, at survival and remission duration. As the follow-up was very long and the biologic surveillance not planned after 2006 we took unequivocal events as censor points for the event-free survival analysis: deaths and second line treatment. At the first cutoff date, in 2006, 49 patients were alive, 30 in the M-Dex arm and 19 in the HDT arm. At the new cutoff date in 2010, 38 patients are alive, 22 in the M-Dex arm and 16 in the intensive arm, with a median follow-up of 49 months for the entire cohort and 86 months for surviving patients (figure 1). The majority of late deaths were amyloid related, but 3 patients in the M-Dex arm died of unrelated lung and digestive cancer. The median survival in the 2 arms has not been modified (56.9 month in the M-Dex arm and 22.2 month in ASCT arm, p=0.15). For the 65 patients included in the landmark analysis the median survival is not different in the 2 arms (103 month in the M-Dex arm and 97 month in ASCT arm) and the median event free survival is 56 months in the M-Dex arm and 26 months in the intensive arm (p=0.3, figure 2). Eleven surviving patients in the M-Dex arm and 6 in the intensive have not received a second treatment, 9 of these patients in the M-Dex arm and 5 in the ASCT arm have normal free light chain measurement at their last visit. Only 1 patient, assigned to receive ASCT, has been diagnosed with myelodysplasia. With a longer follow-up we did not found any superiority in the intensive arm in survival or remission duration even in the landmark analysis eliminating treatment related mortality. In the area of very efficient new drugs this analysis reinforces our choice to propose conventional treatment to amyloidosis patient avoiding the risk of intensive treatment.Figure 1.Survival according to treatment groupFigure 1. Survival according to treatment groupFigure 2.Event-Free Survival According to Treatment Group in the Landmark AnalysisFigure 2. Event-Free Survival According to Treatment Group in the Landmark Analysis Disclosures: Leblond: roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leleu:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Chugai: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text