scholarly journals Functional Status and Therapy for Nursing Home Residents with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Population-Based Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1918-1918
Author(s):  
Mengyang Di ◽  
Adam J. Olszewski ◽  
Tamra Keeney ◽  
Emmanuelle Belanger ◽  
Orestis A. Panagiotou

Abstract Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a potentially curable cancer, predominantly affecting older patients. Functional limitations and comorbidities make its management challenging among those with advanced age. Approximately 23% of Medicare beneficiaries do not receive curative chemoimmunotherapy (Hamlin et al, Oncologist, 2014), and the treatment rates decrease with increasing age (Williams et al, Cancer, 2015). Treatment may be particularly difficult for older nursing home (NH) residents who are physiologically frail and have significant functional limitations. The goal of this study is to describe patterns of cancer-directed therapies and outcomes among NH residents with DLBCL in the United States and dissect the association between functional impairment and receipt of treatment. Methods: We used the SEER-Medicare registry to identify Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with DLBCL in 2011-2015, who had Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 120 days prior to diagnosis or treatment. The MDS is routinely performed in NHs and includes multiple geriatric domains, including physical and cognitive function. We used the Morris activities of daily living (ADL) scale to quantify functional limitations in 7 activities (bed mobility, dressing, eating, locomotion on unit, personal hygiene, toileting, and transfers). We characterized limitations based on dependency in ADLs: no disability (0 ADLs), moderate disability (1-4 ADLs), or severe disability (5-7 ADLs). We used the Cognitive Function Scale (CFS) to characterize cognition as intact, mild, or moderate to severe impairment. We used multivariable logistic regression to compare the receipt of chemoimmunotherapy (including receipt of curative multiagent, anthracycline-containing regimen), 30-day mortality, and 30-day hospitalization, respectively, between the NH and non-NH population, reporting the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We used multivariable Cox regression to compare overall survival (OS) between these two populations, reporting hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI. Within the NH population, we examine the association of receipt of chemotherapy with functional and cognitive impairment, respectively. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race, stage, comorbidities, Medicaid dual coverage, and type of NH stay (long vs. short stay). Results: Among 11,128 patients with DLBCL, 718 received care in NHs (median age 82 years, 59% women, 90% White, 50% stage III/IV disease). Compared with non-NH patients, NH residents were less likely to receive any chemoimmunotherapy (41% vs. 69%, OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.29-0.41) or, when treated, curative regimens (47% vs. 71%, OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.37-0.72) (Fig. 1A-1B). NH residents had high rates of 30-day mortality after therapy (18% vs. 7%, OR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.43-2.77) and 30-day hospitalization (58% vs. 43%, OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.18-1.93), and had short median OS of 3.7 months (versus 31.7 months for non-NH residents; HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.11-1.65) (Fig. 1C). Rates of disability and cognitive impairment were high, 20% had moderate disability, 60% had severe disability and 17-26% had mild or moderate to severe cognitive impairment. Compared with patients with no ADL disability, those with severe disability were less likely to receive any chemoimmunotherapy (38% vs. 50%, OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38-0.89) (Fig. 2A-2B). Compared with those with intact cognitive function, patients with mild (39% vs. 47%, OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45-0.97) and moderate to severe (24% vs. 47%, OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.19-0.51) impairment, respectively, were less likely to receive chemoimmunotherapy (Fig. 2C). Conclusions: In this population-based study, over half of NH residents with DLBCL did not receive chemoimmunotherapy, and 47% of chemotherapy recipients received curative regimens. Despite treatment, NH residents had higher rates of early mortality and hospitalization, and short median survival (only 3.7 months). These findings indicate a need for alternative treatment strategies for patients in NHs, particularly those with high levels of disability. Routinely collected NH assessment data revealed strong associations between receipt of chemotherapy, functional limitations, and cognitive impairment among NH residents with DLBCL. These findings suggest that structured assessment of function and cognition may improve patient selection for curative therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Olszewski: TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; PrecisionBio: Research Funding; Celldex Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Acrotech Pharma: Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding. Panagiotou: International Consulting Associates, Inc: Other: Personal fees.

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 37-38
Author(s):  
Mengyang Di ◽  
Tamra Keeney ◽  
Emmanuelle Belanger ◽  
Orestis A. Panagiotou ◽  
Adam J Olszewski

Background: DLBCL is a potentially curable lymphoma, yet up to 25% of older Medicare beneficiaries with DLBCL do not receive any therapy (Hamlin et al, Oncologist, 2014). Older adults with DLBCL may have vulnerabilities and require care from home health agencies. Functional impairment may compromise DLBCL therapy, but data are lacking about treatment and outcomes of home health services (HHS) recipients. There is ongoing need for accurate and efficient tools to assess function and guide therapy in geriatric patients with DLBCL, as inaccurate assessment may lead to under- and over-treatment with suboptimal outcomes. Medicare beneficiaries who receive HHS periodically undergo functional assessments using the standardized Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS). OASIS scores have been recently linked to SEER-Medicare data, and can offer insights into the role of functional status in DLBCL treatment. We examined the association of functional status, measured in OASIS, and treatments and outcomes in DLBCL. Methods: From SEER-Medicare, we selected beneficiaries diagnosed with DLBCL in 2011-2015, and identified HHS recipients who had OASIS assessments within 3 months before diagnosis or treatment. OASIS instrument measures functional status as a linear score ranging from 0 to 40; higher scores represent worse functioning. We classified the scores as mild (OASIS 0-9), moderate (10-16), and severe (17-40) impairment by tertiles of the population distribution. We examined the following outcomes: receipt of therapy (including standard [RCHOP-like] and non-standard [bendamustine, rituximab monotherapy, etc.] regimens), and among treated patients: mortality, ED visit, hospitalization, and ICU admission within 30 days from first chemotherapy. We used logistic models, reporting odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We additionally compared overall survival (OS) between groups receiving standard and non-standard regimens in each functional category using adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) derived from Cox models. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race, DLBCL stage, and comorbidity index. Results: Among 8,914 beneficiaries with DLBCL, 1,317 had OASIS assessments. Their characteristics included: median age 80 years, 46% men, 83% White, 53% stage 3/4 DLBCL. Median OASIS score was 13 (interquartile range, 7-18). Chemotherapy was administered to 63% of HHS recipients, compared with 75% of other beneficiaries (OR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.57-0.76). HHS recipients were significantly more likely to experience 30-day ED visit, hospitalization, ICU admission, and mortality after chemotherapy (OR 1.24-1.52), and have shorter OS compared with other beneficiaries with DLBCL (7 vs 40 months, aHR, 1.55, 95% CI, 1.44-1.67; Fig. A). Severe functional impairment was associated with lower odds of receiving any therapy, as well as higher rates of acute mortality, hospitalization, and ICU admission. Patients with moderate impairment had an increased risk of 30-day ED visit and ICU admission after chemotherapy (Table). OS was worse with severe functional impairment, even after adjusting for other clinical factors (aHR, 1.64, 95% CI, 1.24-2.17; Fig. B). Functional status was not significantly associated with the use of standard or non-standard regimen, and OS was better with RCHOP-like therapy in all functional groups (aHR, 0.50-0.56, P for interaction: 0.85; Fig. C). Conclusions: In this novel population-based study using OASIS assessments to examine function as a predictor of cancer therapy, functional impairment was an independent predictor of treatment and outcomes in geriatric patients with DLBCL. We observed that a substantial proportion of patients on HHS did not receive any therapy, and worse survival in those who received attenuated regimens, independent of their functioning. Our results highlight the need for novel, less toxic strategies in this population, supporting research on emerging chemotherapy-free approaches. Clinicians should consider a dedicated functional assessment (such as a comprehensive geriatric assessment) to optimize treatment selection in DLBCL. OASIS assessments for HHS recipients are easily available to clinicians and could be incorporated into pre-chemotherapy evaluation to improve patient selection for intensive therapies, potentially avoiding under-treatment with attenuated regimens Disclosures Panagiotou: International Consulting Associates, Inc: Other: personal fees from International Consulting Associates, Inc. outside the scope of the submitted work. Olszewski:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4765-4765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huai-Hsuan Huang ◽  
Fei-Yuan Hsiao ◽  
Ho-Min Chen ◽  
Chen-Yu Wang ◽  
Hwei-Fang Tien ◽  
...  

Background: Rituximab increases the possibility of reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma worldwide. Managing HBV during the treatment for DLBCL is therefore a particularly important issue in HBV endemic area, such as Taiwan. However, there is no population-based study to investigate whether HBV status and antiviral prophylaxis influence the survival in DLBCL patients. Objective: To evaluate the impact of HBV status and antiviral prophylaxis on survival in DLBCL patients, we incorporated the data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database (TCRD), the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), and the National Death Registry in our study. Methods: From TCRD, we identified 6304 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL between 2011 and 2015. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 20 years (n=52), had unknown Ann Arbor stage (n=277), had other cancers before the diagnosis of DLBCL (n=336), or did not receive any treatment for DLBCL (n=514). We also excluded patients treated with regimens other than R-CHOP, R-CVP, CHOP, or CVP (n=711), with unknown HBV (n=492) or hepatitis C virus (HCV, n=152) status, or treated with antiviral therapies but not HBV or HCV carriers (n=65). There were 3702 DLBCL patients treated by R-CHOP, R-CVP, CHOP, or CVP for survival analysis, including 781 HBV carriers. Results: According to the HBV status and the applications of antiviral prophylaxis, we stratified patients into three groups, HBsAg-negative patients (HBV-neg, n=2921), HBV carriers with antiviral prophylaxis (HBV+Tx, n=711), and HBV carriers without antiviral prophylaxis (HBV+No, n=70). The baseline characteristics were similar between the three groups, except that HBV+Tx patients were younger than others (median age: 63.7 years in HBV-neg patients, 57.0 years in HBV+Tx ones, and 62.9 years in HBV+No ones). HBV+Tx patients tended to receive R-CHOP, which was the standard frontline regimen for DLBCL patients (78.2% in HBV-neg patients, 87.5% in HBV+Tx ones, and 77.1% in HBV+No ones). The most frequent used antiviral agent was entecavir (91.0%). In survival analysis, the median overall survival (OS) of HBV-neg patients was 74.23 months, similar to that of HBV+Tx patients (median OS was not reached). However, the median OS of the HBV+No patients was only 35.61 months (P=0.0028 when compared with HBV+Tx patients), which indicated the antiviral prophylaxis improved OS in DLBCL patients with HBV infection. In the multivariate analysis of OS, we included other potential prognostic factors in DLBCL patients, such as gender difference, age, Carlson comorbidity index, Ann Arbor stage, type of frontline chemotherapies for DLBCL, radiotherapy in the frontline therapy, and the practice setting (medical centers or others). The status of HBV and antiviral prophylaxis was still an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis of OS (hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval: 1 for HBV-neg, 1.01 (0.88-1.16) for HBV+Tx, and 1.70 (1.22-2.35) for HBV+No; P=0.0069). Conclusion: From our population-based study, we illustrated the importance of antiviral prophylaxis in the DLBCL patients with HBV infections. HBV carriers would have similar survival to the HBV-negative patients if they received antiviral prophylaxis for HBV infections. Figure Disclosures Tien: Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Johnson &Johnson: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 722-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nozomi Hishikawa ◽  
Yusuke Fukui ◽  
Kota Sato ◽  
Toru Yamashita ◽  
Yasuyuki Ohta ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 489-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beate Gaertner ◽  
Amanda K. Buttery ◽  
Jonas D. Finger ◽  
Steffen Wolfsgruber ◽  
Michael Wagner ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 190 ◽  
pp. 20-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay C. Kobayashi ◽  
M. Maria Glymour ◽  
Kathleen Kahn ◽  
Collin F. Payne ◽  
Ryan G. Wagner ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ganguli ◽  
Yichen Jia ◽  
Tiffany F. Hughes ◽  
Beth E. Snitz ◽  
Chung-Chou H. Chang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document