scholarly journals Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome without Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in a Real-World Population in the United States: Patient Characteristics, Prior Treatment Patterns, and Time to Diagnosis

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1946-1946
Author(s):  
Xue Wang ◽  
Bouchra Benettaib ◽  
Weiyi Ni ◽  
Harry Jin ◽  
Seth Kuranz ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), also known as hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), is a rare form of hepatic injury where liver veins are blocked by damaged endothelial cells (Hildebrandt GC, et al. Br J Haematol. 2020;190:508-19). It is often associated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy given before a hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) but may occur outside of the HCT setting (Richardson PG, et al. Expert Rev Clin Pharm. 2018;11:113-24). The most severe form of VOD/SOS is associated with multiorgan dysfunction/multiorgan failure (MOD/MOF) and has a mortality rate of >80% if untreated (Coppell JA, et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018:53:138-45). This study describes the characteristics of VOD/SOS that occurs outside of the HCT setting (non-HCT VOD/SOS) in patients in the United States (US). Methods: This retrospective real-world evidence (RWE) study identified patient records within the TriNetX Dataworks US Network Electronic Medical Records (EMR) database, which covers 67 million patients from 44 healthcare organizations. Inclusion criteria required that patients had ≥1 record of a VOD/SOS diagnosis (ICD-10 code: K76.5) between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020, had received ≥1 instance of chemotherapy, antibody drug conjugates (ADC), or radiotherapy within 100 days prior to their first recorded VOD/SOS diagnosis, and had no record of HCT during the study period. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics, prior treatment regimen, and time to VOD/SOS diagnosis were characterized using descriptive statistics. Index treatment was defined as the treatment taken in the 100 days prior to VOD/SOS diagnosis, determined by the following hierarchy list of therapies: radiotherapy, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO)/inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), vincristine, cytarabine, oxaliplatin-based, thioguanine, cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil-based, etoposide, daunorubicin, doxorubicin, PEG-L-asparaginase, fludarabine, actinomycin-D, and other chemotherapies. Results: Of the 67 million patients available in the TriNetX database, 614 patients had documented VOD/SOS during the study period. Of those, 542 had ≥1 record in the EMR prior to the first VOD/SOS diagnosis. Among these 542 cases, 419 (77%) were non-HCT-related (did not have a record of HCT in the entire study period); the other 123 (23%) had a record of HCT (Figure 1). Of the 419 non-HCT VOD/SOS patients, 183 (44%) had ≥1 record of chemotherapy, ADC, or radiotherapy within the 100 days prior to first VOD/SOS diagnosis and comprised the study population. Among those 183 patients, 73 (40%) had a diagnosis of MOD/MOF at the same time VOD/SOS was documented; 61 (33%) were pediatric patients (≤16 years of age). Hematologic malignancies were the most common underlying condition (Table 1). A few patients had prior treatment with GO or INO (1% and 3%, respectively). The top 5 most common chemotherapies administered included cytarabine (25%), cyclophosphamide (20%), vincristine (17%), fludarabine (12%), and doxorubicin (11%). Overall, 103 (56%) non-HCT patients had a VOD/SOS diagnosis ≤21 days from index treatment. The median time from index treatment to VOD/SOS diagnosis was 13 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 1, 43 days) among all 183 patients. Among patients without MOD/MOF, median time was 18 days (IQR: 2, 44 days) and among patients with MOD/MOF, median time was 9 days (IQR: 0, 34 days). Conclusions: In this retrospective RWE study, the number of patients diagnosed with VOD/SOS outside of the HCT setting was approximately 3 times higher than those diagnosed in the HCT setting. Less than half of the patients diagnosed with non-HCT VOD/SOS had prior chemotherapy, ADC, or radiotherapy. Many of the non-HCT VOD/SOS patients were diagnosed with MOD/MOF. Among patients with non-HCT VOD/SOS, approximately half received their last dose of chemotherapy/ADC/radiotherapy >21 days before VOD/SOS diagnosis. Study limitations included those inherent to a retrospective study, the absence of availability of chemotherapy dosing in the database, and inability to detect misdiagnosis or under-diagnosis of VOD/SOS (which may result in under-estimation of the true number of VOD/SOS cases). The unexpected, relatively high number of VOD/SOS cases in the non-HCT setting, compared to the post-HCT setting, demonstrates a substantial unmet need, as there is no VOD/SOS treatment currently indicated for these patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Benettaib: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ni: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Jin: TriNetX: Current Employment. Kuranz: Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Payments from Apellis Pharmaceuticals to my institution TriNetX; TriNetX: Current Employment. Amber: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ben-Joseph: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1360-1360
Author(s):  
Dong Dai ◽  
Ji Haeng Heo ◽  
Andrew Rava ◽  
Etienne Jousseaume ◽  
Roberto Ramos ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To determine treatment regimens used in clinical practice and the associated clinical outcomes among third line (3L) follicular lymphoma (FL) patients in the United States (US). Methods: This non-interventional, retrospective study used Optum electronic health records (EHR) database for FL patients in the US between 1 Jan 2007 and 31 Dec 2020. The start of this period was selected to align with the Morrison et al. 2019, with 5 years of additional data. The identification period was 1 Jan 2008 to 31 Dec 2019, to ensure at least 1 year of baseline before and 60 days of follow-up (unless death happens before) after the index date, defined as start date of 3L treatment. Adult patients (≥18 years) treated in integrated delivery networks with at least one of the 3L treatments of interest (rituximab, bendamustine and rituximab, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [PI3K] inhibitors [copanlisib, duvelisib, idelalisib], lenalidomide and rituximab [R2], tazemetostat, and stem cell transplant) were included. Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) diagnosis or clinical trial enrollment on or before the index date or any other cancer diagnosis before the first FL diagnosis were excluded. All agents initiated within 90 days after the index diagnosis constituted the 1L treatment. A subsequent line of therapy (LOT) was defined as treatment initiated after ≥180 days following the runout date of all agents, or addition or substitution of a new agent in the prior LOT after 90 days. The primary endpoints were time to progression (DLBCL transformation, new LOT initiation, or supportive care), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while time to next treatment (TTNT) and treatment patterns were the key secondary endpoints. The analyses were conducted for the overall cohort, patients with early progression within 24 months (POD24) after 1L treatment, patients with index date after and including year 2014, as well as for different 3L treatment regimens. The sub-group with 2014 as index date was selected based on idelalisib approval in 2014. Results: The final cohort of patients (used one of the 3L treatments of interest and met inclusion/exclusion criteria) consisted of 687 patients: mean age 62.9 years (range 18 - 86), female (46.9%), Caucasians (87.3%), non-Hispanics (92.1%), and median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) 3 (range 1 - 18). Rituximab-based regimens (73.7%) were the most common 3L treatments (mono 38.4%, combo 35.2%). Obinutuzumab was used as combination 3L therapy by 6 (0.87%) patients. Bendamustine, PI3K and lenalidomide monotherapies were administered to 3.1%, 2.2% and 1.9% patients, respectively (Figure 1). Rituximab-based regimens were also the most frequently used 1L, 2L, and 4L treatment options (50.8% moved to 4L and 33.6% had rituximab-based regimens). The median time to progression, PFS, and TTNT for 3L in the overall cohort were 16.6 (95% CI 14.4, 18.1), 12.5 (95% CI 11.3, 14.4), and 18 (95% CI 15.8, 19.9) months, respectively. The 1-, 2-and 5-year OS were 83.1%, 74.8% and 61.4%, respectively. The outcomes of 3L among POD24 , non-POD24, as well as patients with index date after and including year 2014 were similar to that of the overall cohort. The median time to progression, PFS, and TTNT with rituximab treatment were 19.1 (95% CI 16.7, 21.7), 15.7 (95% CI 14.2, 17.5), and 18.8 (95% CI 17, 21.7) months respectively. The median OS with rituximab therapy was not reached while the 5-year OS was 67% (Table 1). Moreover, we did not observe statistically significant differences in time to progression, OS, PFS, and TTNT for the 3L treatment between POD24 and non-POD24 patients using a Cox regression model with adjustment for baseline characteristics (age, gender, region, and CCI). The median time to progression, PFS, and TTNT among POD24 vs. non-POD24 were 15.7 vs. 17.9, 11.6 vs. 15.2, and 18 vs. 17.9 months, respectively. Conclusion: Rituximab-based regimens were the most common 3L treatment options for FL patients. Bendamustine, PI3K, and lenalidomide monotherapies were used by a smaller proportion of patients. R2 was used by a small number of patients for 3L treatment, but it is becoming an important option for FL treatment since its approval in 2019. The majority of outcomes observed could be considered poor, newer agents undergoing clinical trials could provide additional treatment choices to physicians to balance treatment effectiveness with safety and patients' quality of life. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Dai: Novartis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Heo: Genesis Research: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rava: Genesis Research: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Jousseaume: Novartis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ramos: Novartis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bollu: Novartis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 35-36
Author(s):  
Mohamad Mohty ◽  
Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
Delphine Lebon ◽  
...  

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) is a potentially fatal complication that occurs after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) conditioning. In its most severe form, VOD/SOS is associated with multi-organ failure (MOF) and a mortality rate of >80% if untreated. Defibrotide is approved for the treatment of hepatic VOD/SOS with renal or pulmonary dysfunction post-HCT in adult and pediatric patients in the United States and severe hepatic VOD/SOS post-HCT in patients aged >1 month in the European Union. The DEFIFrance study collected real-world data on the safety and effectiveness of defibrotide in France. This analysis presents final primary data on the subgroup of DEFIFrance patients who received defibrotide for the treatment of severe/very severe VOD/SOS post-HCT. This post-marketing study collected retrospective and prospective real-world data on patients receiving defibrotide at 53 HCT centers in France from July 15, 2014 to March 31, 2020. VOD/SOS severity was categorized using European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (adults) or study steering committee member adjudication (pediatric patients). The primary endpoints included Kaplan-Meier (KM)-estimated Day 100 (post-HCT) survival and Day 100 complete response (CR; total serum bilirubin <2 mg/dL and MOF resolution per investigators' assessment) in patients with severe/very severe VOD/SOS post-HCT. Secondary endpoints included evaluation of adverse events (AEs) of interest, such as hemorrhage, coagulopathy, injection-site reactions, infections, and thromboembolic events, irrespective of their relationship to treatment. Of the 775 defibrotide-treated patients included in the study analysis, 250 received defibrotide for the treatment of severe/very severe VOD/SOS post-HCT (severe: 119 [48%]; very severe: 131 [52%]). The median patient age was 45 years (range: 5 months, 74 years) and 52 (21%) patients were less than 18 years of age. A total of 219 (88%) patients had received allogeneic HCT and 95 (38%) patients had an unrelated donor. The Day 100 KM-estimated survival was 58% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52%, 64%) in patients with severe/very severe VOD/SOS post-HCT. The estimated Day 100 survival rate was higher in patients with severe (74% [95% CI: 65%, 81%]) versus very severe (43% [95% CI: 35%, 52%]) VOD/SOS. Among patients with severe/very severe VOD/SOS post-HCT, the CR rate at Day 100 was 53% (95% CI: 47%, 59%). The Day 100 CR rate was higher in patients with severe (68% [95% CI: 60%, 77%]) versus very severe (39% [95% CI: 30%, 47%]) VOD/SOS. Treatment emergent AEs of interest occurred in 41% of patients with severe/very severe VOD/SOS, with infection (23%) and bleeding (17%) being the most commonly reported. The DEFIFrance study represents the largest collection of real-world data on the use of defibrotide. The effectiveness and safety observed in this study build upon prior studies supporting the utility of defibrotide for treating severe/very severe VOD/SOS post-HCT in a real-world setting. Among patients receiving defibrotide for VOD/SOS post-HCT, outcomes were better in patients with severe versus very severe disease, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of VOD/SOS before patients reach the most severe stage of VOD/SOS. Disclosures Mohty: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Yakoub-Agha:Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria, Other: travel support; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Labopin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Blaise:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Renard:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Jubert:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Ryan:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bouvatier:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Dalle:Bellicum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orchard: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Peffault De Latour:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. S127
Author(s):  
Viengneesee Thao ◽  
Ezra Golberstein ◽  
William Thomas ◽  
Katy Backes Kozhimannil ◽  
Lih-Wen Mau ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1385-1390 ◽  
Author(s):  
N S Majhail ◽  
S Nayyar ◽  
M E Burton Santibañez ◽  
E A Murphy ◽  
E M Denzen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document