scholarly journals Longitudinal Efficacy and Safety of N8-GP for Prophylaxis and Bleed Control in US Patients

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3205-3205
Author(s):  
Allison P. Wheeler ◽  
Miguel A. Escobar ◽  
Susan Kearney ◽  
Janice M. Staber ◽  
Adam R. Wufsus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Routine Prophylaxis ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Extension Trial

Abstract Introduction: N8-GP is an extended half-life recombinant factor VIII product indicated for use in patients with hemophilia A. The pathfinder trials evaluated routine prophylaxis and bleed control in previously treated patients aged ≥12 years (pathfinder2) and patients aged <12 years (pathfinder5), including an extension trial (pathfinder8). The objective of the present analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of N8-GP in US vs global (including US) patients. Methods: In the pathfinder2 trial, patients aged ≥12 years with severe hemophilia A were administered N8-GP 50 IU/kg every 4 days (Q4D) as routine prophylaxis or 20 to 70 IU/kg as on-demand treatment. Patients aged <12 years received prophylaxis with N8-GP 60 IU/kg twice weekly in the pathfinder5 trial, and bleeding episodes were treated with 20 to 75 IU/kg. In the pathfinder8 extension trial, the investigator decided on which treatment arm the patient should be allocated based on previous treatment regimen and taking into account bleeding tendency. Results: See Table for efficacy in prophylaxis (median annualized bleeding rates [ABRs]) and bleed treatment (success rate). Median ABRs tended to decrease from 0.84 (global) and 0.86 (US) in pathfinder2 to 0.00 (global) and 0.00 (US) in pathfinder8 in patients aged ≥12 years on the prophylaxis regimen. In addition, in patients aged <12 years, median ABRs decreased from 0.81 (global) and 0.76 (US) in pathfinder5 to 0.00 (global) and 0.49 (US) in pathfinder8. Treatment success rates for US patients were comparable to those for global patients across trials and 100% were rated "excellent" or "good" for patients aged <12 years in pathfinder8. Overall, there were 59 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in patients on the prophylactic regimen in pathfinder2, 13 of which occurred in US patients, and 11 treatment-related AEs in patients treated on-demand, 3 of which occurred in US patients. In pathfinder5, there were 16 treatment-related AEs, 7 of which occurred in US patients. In pathfinder8, there were 6 treatment-related AEs in patients aged ≥12 years, 3 of which were in US patients. In addition, there was 1 treatment-related AE in a non-US patient aged <12 years. AEs included rash, redness, and injection site reactions. Across trials, 1 previously treated patient (an 18-year-old, from a US site) with an intron 22 inversion developed a low-titer inhibitor at 93 exposure days to N8-GP and was withdrawn when the titer progressed to >5 Bethesda units. The patient returned to their previous FVIII product, and their inhibitor status was negative at follow-up. Conclusions: Efficacy of N8-GP was sustained during the main and extension pathfinder trials in both global and US patients. In addition, a favorable safety profile was maintained throughout the course of the program. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wheeler: Novo Nordisk A/S: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; BioMarin: Consultancy; HEMA Biologics: Consultancy; Spark: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; UniQure: Consultancy. Kearney: Grifols: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; CVS Pharmacy: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Staber: Bayer, CSL Behring, Sanofi, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wufsus: Novo Nordisk Inc: Current Employment. Ostrow: Novo Nordisk Inc: Current Employment. Lentz: Novo Nordisk Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Improvement of Efficacy Outcomes in Patients Who Switched from Sucrose-Formulated rFVIII to BAY 81-8973 Prophylaxis in the LEOPOLD Clinical Trials

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 20-21
Author(s):  
Gili Kenet ◽  
Thomas Moulton ◽  
Erika Soltes Rak ◽  
Brian M. Wicklund ◽  
Sanjay P Ahuja
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Adults And Children ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Bleeding Episodes

Background BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry®) is a full-length, unmodified, recombinant factor VIII (FVIII), indicated for on-demand treatment and control of bleeding episodes, perioperative management of bleeding and routine prophylaxis to reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in adults and children with hemophilia A. It has the same amino acid sequence as sucrose formulated FVIII (FVIII-FS; Kogenate® FS/Helixate® FS). Pharmacokinetic comparisons confirmed BAY 81-8973 to have a longer half-life and lower clearance than FVIII-FS. The objective of this analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety outcomes of patients with hemophilia A who were receiving FVIII-FS prior to enrolling into the LEOPOLD clinical studies receiving BAY 81-8973. Methods LEOPOLD I (NCT01029340) Part B and LEOPOLD Kids (NCT01311648) were Phase 3, multinational, open-label studies that included male patients with severe hemophilia A receiving on-demand or prophylactic therapy, with ≥50 exposure days to any FVIII product and no history of FVIII inhibitors. Patients in LEOPOLD I were >12 years old and received 20-50 IU/kg BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis twice-weekly (2×W) or three times a week (3×W) for up to one year. Patients in LEOPOLD Kids were ≤12 years old and received 25-50 IU/kg BAY 81-8973 ≥2×W for six months. Dosing regimens for both studies were assigned by the investigator. In this analysis, efficacy and safety are assessed in the subset of patients in LEOPOLD I Part B and LEOPOLD Kids who were previously treated with FVIII-FS. Results In LEOPOLD I, 22 (35.5%) patients were previously treated with FVIII-FS with a median age of 27.0; in LEOPOLD Kids, 24 (47.1%) patients were previously treated with FVIII-FS with a median age of 5.0 (Table 1). In general, these switch cohorts had similar patient demographics to the whole study cohort (Table 1) and any differences did not affect the final analysis. Most patients did not change their dosing frequency when starting treatment with BAY 81-8973 but most increased their dose (FVIII-FS dose is 25 IU/kg 3×W [adults] or every other day [EOD; children]; BAY 81-8973 dose is 25-40 IU/kg 2×W or 3×W [>12 years] or 25-50 IU/kg 2×W, 3×W or EOD [≤12 years]). Switching from FVIII-FS to BAY 81-8973 resulted in lower median annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) in the LEOPOLD studies. In LEOPOLD I, median (Q1; Q3) total ABR decreased from 2.5 (0.0; 9.0) in the 12 months of FVIII-FS treatment prior to study entry, to 1.0 (0.0; 6.8) (Figure 1). In LEOPOLD Kids, median total ABR decreased from 3.0 (1.0; 12.0) to 2.0 (0.0; 6.0) for 0-<6 year old patients (n = 13) and from 4.0 (0.0; 10) to 0.0 (0.0; 2.1) for 6-12 year old patients (n = 11) after switching from FVIII-FS to BAY 81-8973 (Figure 1). Joint and spontaneous median ABRs were zero for <12 year old patients treated with BAY 81-8973. There were no study-drug-related adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs (SAEs) reported in patients switching from FVIII-FS to BAY 81-8973 in either LEOPOLD I Part B or LEOPOLD Kids (Table 2). One patient in the LEOPOLD Kids main study discontinued BAY 81-8973 due to a central venous catheter-related infection after six months of treatment, which was not considered study-drug-related. No FVIII inhibitors developed in any patients in either study. Conclusions Switching from FVIII-FS to BAY 81-8973 resulted in improved bleeding control in adults and children with hemophilia A and was well-tolerated. Disclosures Kenet: PI Healthcare, CSL Behring: Honoraria; Bayer, Pfizer, Takeda, BioMarin, Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Bayer, Pfizer, Roche, Alnylam (Sanofi), Shire: Research Funding; Bayer, Pfizer, BioMarin, Takeda, Roche, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moulton:Bayer: Current Employment. Soltes Rak:Bayer: Other: Employee of Belcan, contracted with Bayer. Wicklund:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire (Takeda): Consultancy, Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ahuja:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; XaTek, Inc.: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Ibrutinib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Small Lymphocytic Leukemia with 17p Deletion: Results from the Phase II RESONATE™-17 Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 327-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Jeffrey A. Jones ◽  
Steven Coutre ◽  
Anthony R. Mato ◽  
Peter Hillmen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with deletion of the short arm of chromosome 17 (del 17p) follow an aggressive clinical course and demonstrate a median survival of less than 2 years in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. Ibrutinib (ImbruvicaTM), a first-in-class Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, has been approved for previously treated patients with CLL and for patients with del 17p CLL. We report results from the primary analysis of the Phase II RESONATETM-17 (PCYC-1117-CA) study, designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent ibrutinib for treatment of patients with R/R del 17p CLL or small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL). Methods: Patients with del 17p CLL or SLL who failed at least one therapy were enrolled to receive 420 mg oral ibrutinib once daily until progression. All patients receiving at least one dose of ibrutinib were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per an independent review committee (IRC). Other endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety of ibrutinib. Results: Among 144 treated patients (137 with CLL, 7 with SLL), the median age was 64 (48% 65 years or older) and all had del 17p. Baseline characteristics included 63% of patients with Rai Stage III or IV disease, 49% with bulky lymphadenopathy of at least 5 cm, and 10% with lymphadenopathy of least 10 cm. The median baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was 32.9 x 109/L with 57% of patients with a baseline ALC at least 25.0 x 109/L. Baseline beta-2 microglobulin levels were at least 3.5 mg/L in 78% of patients (range 1.8-19.8 mg/L), and lactate dehydrogenase levels were at least 350 U/L in 24% of patients (range 127-1979 U/L). A median of 2 prior therapies (range 1-7) was reported. Investigator-assessed ORR was 82.6% including 17.4% partial response with lymphocytosis (PR-L). Complete response (CR)/complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi) were reported in 3 patients. IRC-assessed ORR is pending. At a median follow up of 13.0 months (range 0.5-16.7 months), the median PFS (Figure 1) and DOR by investigator determination had not been reached. At 12 months, 79.3% were alive and progression-free, and 88.3% of responders were progression-free. Progressive disease was reported in 20 patients (13.9%). Richter transformation was reported in 11 of these patients (7.6%), 7 of the cases occurring within the first 24 weeks of treatment. Prolymphocytic leukemia was reported in 1 patient. The most frequently reported adverse events (AE) of any grade were diarrhea (36%; 2% Grade 3-4), fatigue (30%; 1% Grade 3-4), cough (24%; 1% Grade 3-4), and arthralgia (22%; 1% Grade 3-4). Atrial fibrillation of any grade was reported in 11 patients (7.6%; 3.5% Grade 3-4). Seven patients reported basal or squamous cell skin cancer and 1 patient had plasma cell myeloma. Most frequently reported Grade 3-4 AEs were neutropenia (14%), anemia (8%), pneumonia (8%), and hypertension (8%). Major hemorrhage was reported in 7 patients (4.9%, all Grade 2 or 3). Study treatment was discontinued in 16 patients (11.1%) due to AEs with 8 eventually having fatal events (pneumonia, sepsis, myocardial or renal infarction, health deterioration). At the time of data cut, the median treatment duration was 11.1 months, and 101 of 144 patients (70%) continued treatment with ibrutinib. Conclusions: In the largest prospective trial dedicated to the study of del 17p CLL/SLL, ibrutinib demonstrated marked efficacy in terms of ORR, DOR, and PFS, with a favorable risk-benefit profile. At a median follow up of 13 months, the median DOR had not yet been reached; 79.3% of patients remained progression-free at 12 months, consistent with efficacy observed in earlier studies (Byrd, NEJM 2013;369:32-42). The PFS in this previously treated population compares favorably to that of treatment-naïve del 17p CLL patients receiving fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) (Hallek, Lancet 2010;376:1164-74) or alemtuzumab (Hillmen, J Clin Oncol 2007;10:5616-23) with median PFS of 11 months. The AEs are consistent with those previously reported for ibrutinib (Byrd, NEJM 2014;371:213-23). These results support ibrutinib as an effective therapy for patients with del 17p CLL/SLL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures O'Brien: Amgen, Celgene, GSK: Consultancy; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent, Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Pharmacyclics, Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Jones:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Coutre:Janssen, Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mato:Pharamcyclics, Genentech, Celegene, Millennium : Speakers Bureau. Hillmen:Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Gilead, Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tam:Pharmacyclics and Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siddiqi:Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Furman:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Brown:Sanofi, Onyx, Vertex, Novartis, Boehringer, GSK, Roche/Genentech, Emergent, Morphosys, Celgene, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Gilead: Consultancy. Stevens-Brogan:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Li:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Fardis:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Clow:Pharmacyclics: Employment. James:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Chu:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hallek:Janssen, Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stilgenbauer:Pharmacyclics, Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals 99.3% of Inhibitors in Severe Hemophilia a Develop before Exposure Day 75. Time to Change Definition of Previously Treated Patients; Data from 1038 Patients with Severe Hemophilia a of the Pednet Registry

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2472-2472
Author(s):  
Marijke Van den Berg ◽  
Kathelijn Fischer ◽  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Herve Chambost ◽  
Karin Kurnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract Introduction.In patients with hemophilia treated with factor VIII products, the development of inhibitory antibodies poses the largest safety risk. Especially during the first 50 exposure days (EDs), up to 37% of patients with severe hemophilia A have been reported to develop an inhibitor. To study neo-immunogenicity of products and new treatment strategies, patients have been distinguished into previously untreated (PUPs) and previously treated patients (PTPs); the latter defined as patients treated for more than 150 EDs. The number of 150 EDs was established in the eighties during a time when most patients received on-demand treatment and testing for inhibitors was not frequently performed. More recent studies on inhibitor incidence in PUPs with severe hemophilia A report that 50% of inhibitors develop within 14-15 EDs, however the cut-off number of EDs for a PUP to become a PTP is not well defined. The aim of this study was to define the number of EDs for PUPs to become PTPs based on long-term follow-up of patients with severe hemophilia A Methods.All patients with severe hemophilia A born after January 1, 2000, treated for at least 1 ED and followed prospectively until inhibitor development or the number of EDs at last follow-up, were included. The number of EDs at inhibitor development is the last exposure day before the first positive titer was reported. An inhibitor was defined as positive when at least two positive inhibitor titers were measured. Positivity was defined according to the cut-off level in each individual center's laboratory. Results.Of 1,038 PUPs with severe hemophilia A, 930 (89.6%) were followed until 75 EDs, 429 until 500 EDs and 212 until 1000 EDs. In total, 300 inhibitors developed, of which 298 (99.3%) within the first 75 EDs. Thereafter only two inhibitors developed, both low titer: after 249 and 264 EDs. Conclusion.Almost all inhibitors develop during the first 75 EDs. Patients with severe hemophilia A can be defined as PTP after 75 instead of 150 exposure days. A change of definition of PTP will increase the number of severe hemophilia A patients eligible for new therapies. Disclosures Santagostino: Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Male:SOBI: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Oldenburg:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Liesner:Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Other: Clinical study investigator for NuProtect Study (Octapharma sponsored), Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Carcao:Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL-Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nolan:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Álvarez-Roman:Shire: Consultancy; NovoNordisk: Consultancy; SOBI: Consultancy. Koenigs:Gilead: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Intersero: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Roche/Chugai: Consultancy; EU (IMI, FP7): Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jansen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals An Insight into the Impact of Hemophilia a on Daily Life According to Disease Severity: A Preliminary Analysis of the CHESS II Study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Declan Noone ◽  
Francis Nissen ◽  
Tao Xu ◽  
Tom Burke ◽  
Sohaib Asghar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
Social Activity ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
On Demand ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Hemophilia A (HA) is a congenital bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency in clotting factor VIII (FVIII). There are currently limited data on the impact of HA on daily life. Here we examine the impact of HA on the daily life of adult persons with HA (PwHA) without current FVIII inhibitors according to disease severity. Methods: The Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: a Socioeconomic Survey II (CHESS II) is a retrospective, burden-of-illness study in adults with mild, moderate, and severe HA or hemophilia B (defined by endogenous FVIII/IX [IU/dL] relative to normal; mild, 5-<40%; moderate, 1-5%; severe, <1%); this analysis includes only PwHA. Male participants (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with HA (without FVIII inhibitors) at least 12 months prior to clinical consultation were enrolled from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Romania, Spain, and the UK. Data on clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization were captured via electronic case report forms disseminated to hemophilia specialists. PwHA completed a paper-based questionnaire utilizing 5-point Likert scales to assess the disease burden on their daily life. Overall, 12 months' retrospective data were examined. Informed consent was obtained and the study was approved by the University of Chester ethical committee. Results: Of 258 PwHA completing questionnaires, 15.9% (n=41), 27.9% (n=72), and 56.2% (n=145) had mild, moderate, and severe HA, respectively. Of those with severe HA, 60.0% were currently receiving FVIII prophylaxis (standard of care for severe HA); in comparison, 4.9% and 6.9% of those with mild and moderate HA were receiving prophylaxis (Table 1). Treatment adaptation in anticipation of physical or social activity was reported by 19.5%, 23.6%, and 38.6% of those with mild, moderate, and severe HA, respectively. Over a third of participants with mild (36.6%) and moderate (44.4%) HA, and 64.8% of those with severe HA (58.6% with severe HA receiving on-demand treatment and 69.0% receiving prophylaxis) agreed or strongly agreed that HA had reduced their physical activity (Figure 1). Overall, 38.9% of those with moderate HA and 58.6% of those with severe HA (63.8% with severe HA receiving on-demand treatment and 55.2% receiving prophylaxis) agreed or strongly agreed that their HA had reduced their social activity; this was less pronounced in mild HA (9.8%). Additionally, 31.7%, 36.1%, and 64.1% of those with mild, moderate, and severe HA (62.1% with severe HA receiving on-demand treatment and 65.5% receiving prophylaxis) agreed or strongly agreed that their HA had caused them to miss opportunities. Correspondingly, frustration due to HA was felt by 19.5%, 34.7% and 57.9% (56.9% with severe HA receiving on-demand treatment and 58.6% receiving prophylaxis) of people, respectively. When asked whether they believed their daily life was compromised due to their hemophilia, 24.4%, 37.5%, and 63.4% of those with mild, moderate, and severe HA, respectively, agreed. Pain, as reported by the physician, was noted in 36.6% of people with mild HA (100% was reported as 'mild'); in people with moderate HA, pain was reported as 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' in 44.4%, 20.8%, and 1.4% of PwHA, respectively. In people with severe HA, pain was reported as 'mild', 'moderate', and 'severe' in 39.7%, 27.6%, and 8.6% for those receiving on-demand treatment, and 37.9%, 32.2%, and 8.0% for those receiving prophylaxis, respectively. Conclusions: In all disease severity groups, there was a notable group of PwHA that felt that they have had to reduce their physical and social activity, have had fewer opportunities and are frustrated due to their disease. While the impact on daily life is most pronounced in people with severe HA (including those receiving on-demand treatment and those receiving prophylaxis), it is also apparent in mild and moderate HA, indicating that there may be an unmet medical need in these groups. Disclosures Noone: Healthcare Decision Consultants: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Research Investigator PROBE: Research Funding; European Haemophilia Consortium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nissen:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment; Actelion: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding. Xu:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Other: All authors received support for third party writing assistance, furnished by Scott Battle, PhD, provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.. Burke:University of Chester: Current Employment; HCD Economics: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy. Asghar:HCD Economics: Current Employment. Dhillon:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Other: All authors received editorial support for this abstract, furnished by Scott Battle, funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland. ; HCD Economics: Current Employment. Aizenas:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Meier:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. O'Hara:HCD Economics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy. Khair:Biomarin: Consultancy; HCD Economics: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medikhair: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Haemnet: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Surgery with Turoctocog Alfa: Efficacy and Safety in Bleeding Prevention During Surgical Procedures - Results From the guardian™ Trials.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2228-2228
Author(s):  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Steven R. Lentz ◽  
Mudi Misgav ◽  
Brigitte Brand ◽  
Pratima Chowdary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advisory Boards ◽  
Surgical Bleeding ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Hemostatic Efficacy ◽  
The Guardian ◽  
Extension Trial

Abstract Abstract 2228 Introduction: Novo Nordisk is developing turoctocog alfa, a human third generation recombinant FVIII for treatment of hemophilia A. During the pivotal trial in adult and adolescent previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A (guardian™1), subjects in need of surgery were able to participate in a subtrial to document efficacy and safety of turoctocog alfa in prevention of surgical bleeding. Pediatric (<12 years of age) previously treated patients in the guardian™3 trial were allowed to undergo minor surgery if needed during the trial. In addition, after completing these initial trials subjects were allowed to continue treatment with turoctocog alfa in the extension trial (guardian™2) which also includes a subtrial to document efficacy and safety of turoctocog alfa in prevention of surgical bleeding. Methods: We here describe surgeries performed within the guardian trials. For the ongoing guardian™2 extension trial, only cases included in the interim analysis (data cut-off 21NOV2011) are included. Results: In all, results from 10 major and 3 minor surgeries are included. Surgery indication was related to hemophilia joint disease in 8/13 cases. The hemostatic efficacy during and after surgery was rated on a 4-point scale (excellent, good, moderate and none) by the Investigator and/or Surgeon. Details and outcome of the individual surgeries performed are presented in Table 1. In addition, there were no safety concerns. Discussion: Prevention of surgical bleeding is an important aspect of hemophilia treatment. In the present 13 surgeries, including all surgeries performed with turoctocog alfa in the phase 3 guardian™ trials, hemostatic efficacy during and after was rated as either excellent or good in each case. The results support that turoctocog alfa has an excellent safety and efficacy profile for use in hemophilia A. Disclosures: Santagostino: Novo Nordisk and Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer, Baxter, Bayer, CSL Behring, Kedrion, Grifols and Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Bayer, Baxter, Pfizer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Biotest, Kedrion and Grifols: Speakers Bureau. Lentz:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding. Brand:Bayer: Travel support, Travel support Other; Novo Nordisk, Baxter, Pfizer: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria. Chowdary:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy. Savic:Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau. Lindblom:Novo Nordisk A/S: Employment.

Safety and Prophylactic Efficacy Profiles of ACE910, a Humanized Bispecific Antibody Mimicking the FVIII Cofactor Function, in Japanese Hemophilia A Patients Both without and with FVIII Inhibitors: First-in-Patient Phase 1 Study

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 691-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Midori Shima ◽  
Hideji Hanabusa ◽  
Masashi Taki ◽  
Tadashi Matsushita ◽  
Tetsuji Sato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bispecific Antibody ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Prophylactic Efficacy ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Study Enrollment ◽  
Bypassing Agents

Abstract Background: Although routine supplementation of exogenous factor VIII (FVIII) effectively prevents bleeding complications in hemophilia A patients, the development of FVIII inhibitors and the need for frequent venous access are still problematic. To overcome these medical problems, a humanized bispecific antibody to factors IXa and X (ACE910) mimicking the FVIII cofactor function has been created. Objectives: To investigate the safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of ACE910 as well as its prophylactic efficacy on bleeding, a first-in-patient open-label phase I study was conducted with once-weekly subcutaneous (SC) administration of ACE910 in Japanese hemophilia A patients both without and with FVIII inhibitors. Methods: In the present study, Japanese patients with severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C <1%, ages 12 to 59 years) were treated with once-weekly SC ACE910 at one of the following dose levels for 12 successive weeks: 0.3 (C-1), 1 (C-2) and 3 mg/kg (C-3). Loading doses of 1 and 3 mg/kg were administered as initial doses to the C-1 and C-2 cohorts, respectively. Prior to the study enrollment, the patients without FVIII inhibitors had received FVIII prophylactic replacement therapy while the patients with FVIII inhibitors had received on-demand therapy and/or prophylactic therapy with bypassing agents. Each cohort included 6 patients (18 patients in total). At least 2 patients without and with FVIII inhibitors were enrolled in each cohort. The annualized bleeding rate (ABR) during 12 weeks receiving ACE910 was calculated, and compared to those demonstrated during 6 months period prior to the study enrollment. In case bleeding event occurred during the course of ACE910 administrations, the patient was treated with on-demand use of FVIII or bypassing agents. Results: The results of the C-1 and C-2 cohorts during 12 weeks receiving ACE910 are shown in this abstract since C-3 cohort is under evaluation. The results from the C-3 cohort will be presented at the time of the meeting. (1) Safety Data In total, 30 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 10 out of the 12 patients. All AEs were of mild intensity, except for 1 moderate AE in a patient on the C-2 cohort (upper respiratory tract infection). Neither serious adverse events nor laboratory abnormalities to indicate a hypercoagulable state were observed in either cohort. In addition, no AEs related to hypercoagulation were observed including when concomitant on-demand therapy (FVIII or bypassing agents) was given for bleeding. One patient in the C-2 cohort discontinued ACE910 administration due to erythema at the injection site of mild intensity. No anti-ACE910 antibodies were developed during the course of ACE910 administrations. (2) Efficacy Data Four out of 6 patients had FVIII inhibitors in both cohorts. The inhibitor titers of these patients were 3-111 BU/mL. All the patients in both groups had target joints. The ABR prior to the study enrollment in the patients without and with FVIII inhibitors ranged 8.1-77.1 and 18.3-56.8, respectively. During the course of ACE910 administrations the ABR decreased in all patients compared to the ABR prior to the study enrollment. In the C-1 cohort, the ABR decreased by 22.8%-100% and 64.7%-100% in the patients without and with FVIII inhibitors, respectively. In the C-2 cohort, the ABR decreased by 100% and 88.9%-100% in the patients without and with FVIII inhibitors, respectively. (3) Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data The plasma ACE910 concentration increased in a dose-dependent manner. In all the patients in both cohorts, shortening of APTT and promotion of thrombin generation were observed after the start of ACE910 dosing. Conclusion: The present study is the first to demonstrate that once-weekly SC ACE910 prophylaxis possesses a favorable safety and a promising efficacy profiles in severe hemophilia A patients irrespective of the presence of FVIII inhibitors. Collectively, ACE910 is expected to offer an effective and convenient prophylactic treatment option for hemophilia A, including patients with FVIII inhibitors and/or with venous access difficulty. Disclosures Shima: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: ACE910 clinical phase1 study. Hanabusa:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding. Taki:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding. Matsushita:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding. Sato:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding. Fukutake:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Research Funding. Fukazawa:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Employment. Maisawa:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Employment. Yoneyama:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Employment. Nogami:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Efficacy and Safety of Ponatinib According to Prior Approved Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Therapy in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML): Results From the PACE Trial

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3749-3749
Author(s):  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽  
Philipp le Coutre ◽  
Ronald Paquette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3749 Background: Ponatinib is a potent pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor that is active against native and mutated forms of BCR-ABL, including the uniformly TKI-resistant T315I mutant. The efficacy and safety of ponatinib (45 mg orally once daily) in patients with CP-CML were evaluated in a pivotal phase 2, international, open-label clinical trial. Objectives: This prospectively defined analysis was performed to evaluate the impact that previous exposure to approved TKIs had on the efficacy and safety of ponatinib treatment among patients with CP-CML. Methods: The PACE trial enrolled 449 patients, including 270 patients with CP-CML. Enrolled patients were required to be resistant or intolerant (R/I) to dasatinib or nilotinib, or they had to have the T315I mutation at baseline. Patients with CP-CML were assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts: R/I (N=203) or T315I (N=64). Three patients were post-imatinib and did not have T315I at baseline; they were treated but not assigned to a cohort. The primary endpoint was major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at any time within 12 months after treatment initiation. The trial is ongoing. Data as of 23 July 2012 are reported, with a minimum follow-up of 9 months (median 12 [0.1 to 19] months). The efficacy and safety of ponatinib according to prior approved TKI therapy (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib) is presented for the total CP-CML (N=270) population. Results: The median age of CP-CML patients was 60 (18 to 94) years. Median time from initial diagnosis to start of ponatinib was 7 (0.5 to 27) years. Patients were heavily pretreated: 97% had received prior imatinib, 80% dasatinib, 68% nilotinib; 7% of patients had received 1 prior approved TKI, 40% 2 prior approved TKIs, 53% all 3 prior approved TKIs; 60% had received ≥3 prior approved/investigational TKIs. In patients previously treated with dasatinib or nilotinib (N=256), 84% had a history of resistance and 16% were purely intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib. At the time of analysis, 66% of patients remained on study. The most common reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; 12%) and progressive disease (7%). Response rates according to the number of prior approved TKIs are shown in the table below. Patients receiving fewer prior approved TKIs had higher response rates. The difference in MCyR rate was statistically significant for patients previously treated with 1 vs. 3 approved TKIs (p=0.003) and for patients previously treated with 2 vs. 3 approved TKIs (p=0.011). Differences in MMR rates were not statistically significant. Of patients achieving MCyR, 98% of patients receiving 2 prior approved TKIs and 83% of patients receiving 3 prior approved TKIs were predicted (Kaplan-Meier) to remain in MCyR at 1 year. Of patients achieving MMR, 86% of patients receiving 2 prior approved TKIs and 80% of patients receiving 3 prior approved TKIs were predicted (Kaplan-Meier) to remain in MMR at 1 year. Kaplan-Meier estimates were not calculable for patients receiving 1 prior TKI. The most common treatment-related AEs according to number of prior approved TKIs (1, 2, 3, respectively) were thrombocytopenia (32%, 38%, 44%), rash (37%, 37%, 39%), dry skin (37%, 36%, 39%), abdominal pain (21%, 26%, 28%), and headache (26%, 28%, 19%). Rash, dry skin, abdominal pain, and headache were generally grade 1 or 2 in severity. Thrombocytopenia was typically reported early in treatment and was manageable with or without dose reductions and/or dose interruptions. Conclusions: Ponatinib has substantial activity in patients with CP-CML, with higher response rates and improved tolerability observed in patients receiving fewer prior approved TKIs. Data with a minimum follow-up of 12 months will be presented. Disclosures: Kim: Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, ARIAD, and Il-Yang: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cortes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD, Pfizer, and Chemgenex: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pinilla-Ibarz:Novartis, BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. le Coutre:Novartis and BMS: Honoraria. Paquette:ARIAD: Consultancy. Chuah:Novartis and Bristol Myers-Squibb: Honoraria. Nicolini:Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Apperley:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Talpaz:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abruzzese:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rea:Bristol Myers-Squibb, Novartis, and Teva: Honoraria. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Muller:ARIAD: Consultancy. Wong:MolecularMD Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Guilhot:ARIAD: Honoraria. Hochhaus:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, and MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldman:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Amgen: Honoraria. Shah:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Kantarjian:Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding.

Efficacy and Safety Of Fedratinib (SAR302503/TG101348) In Patients With Intermediate- Or High-Risk Myelofibrosis (MF), Post-Polycythemia Vera (PV) MF, Or Post-Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) MF Previously Treated With Ruxolitinib: Interim Results From a Phase II Study (JAKARTA-2)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 661-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire N Harrison ◽  
Nicolaas PM Schaap ◽  
Sonja Zweegman ◽  
Eric Jourdan ◽  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background The JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved for treatment of myelofibrosis (MF). However, some patients do not respond to RUX, while others lose responsiveness or develop intolerance to RUX over time. Preclinical data also suggest that certain JAK2 mutations (eg the gatekeeper mutation M929I) may confer resistance to RUX (Leukemia 2012;26:708). Options for these RUX resistant/intolerant patients, particularly with regard to further JAK inhibitor therapy, are unclear. Fedratinib (SAR302503) is a JAK2-selective inhibitor which has demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in splenomegaly and symptom burden in patients with MF, with an acceptable and consistent safety profile (J Clin Oncol 2011;29:789. Haematologica 2013;98:S1113). Fedratinib sensitivity in vitro is unaffected by the M929I mutation. This pre-specified interim analysis of the JAKARTA-2 study (NCT01523171) investigated the efficacy and safety of fedratinib in MF patients previously treated with RUX. Methods JAKARTA-2 is a Phase II, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of patients who previously received RUX for MF. Patients ≥18 yrs with splenomegaly and platelet count ≥50 ×109/L received fedratinib 400 mg orally, once daily for consecutive 4-wk cycles (permitted dose adjustment to 200–600 mg daily). Eligible patients had received ≥14 d RUX treatment, and had discontinued RUX for ≥14 d prior to starting fedratinib. Although there is no consensus definition of RUX resistance/intolerance, for the purpose of this study patients were classed (investigator assessment) as resistant (lack or loss of response) or intolerant to RUX. Primary endpoint for the interim analysis: spleen response rate (RR) (≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline at Wk 12 [MRI/CT blinded central review]) in the per-protocol (PP) population. Secondary endpoints: symptom RR (≥50% reduction in total symptom score [TSS: modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form] from baseline to Wk 12) and safety. Results At the cut-off date for this interim analysis, 27 patients had received fedratinib treatment (median RUX exposure 10.7 months [range 1.9–34.4]): median age 69 yrs; 56% male; 67% primary MF; 63% high-risk MF; 67% JAK2V617F positive; 41% platelet count <100 × 109/L; baseline median spleen volume 3190 mL [1072–7815]; baseline median TSS 19.6 [4.9–46.0]. Eighteen patients were considered resistant by the treating physician (8 lack of response, 3 disease progression, 7 loss of response; median RUX exposure 11.1 months [range 1.9–34.4]) and 9 intolerant (6 hematologic, 3 non-hematologic toxicity; median RUX exposure 9.2 months [2.9–33.2]) to RUX. Median fedratinib exposure to cut-off date: 4 cycles (range 1–10); 19 patients remain on treatment. Spleen RRs were 40% (8/20 PP patients) and 43% (3/7) in patients with baseline platelet count <100 ×109/L. Overall, 19% (5/26 evaluable patients) had a symptom response by Wk 12 (Table). The majority of patients had a reduction in TSS at Wk 12 (Figure). The most common non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were gastrointestinal (nausea 67%; diarrhea 56%; vomiting 48%). Grade 3/4 diarrhea occurred in 2 patients; no Grade 3/4 vomiting or nausea. Anemia was the most common hematologic AE (all grades, 93%; Grade 3, 41%; Grade 4, 0%). Thrombocytopenia (all grades) occurred in 19 (70%) patients; Grade 3 in 6 patients and Grade 4 in 2 patients. One patient had Grade 3 AST elevations and 1 patient had Grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia. Seven patients (26%) discontinued treatment due to AEs. There were 2 deaths on study, both due to disease progression. Conclusions Interim results from the JAKARTA-2 study indicate that once-daily fedratinib provides clinical benefit, through reduced splenomegaly and symptom burden, in MF patients previously treated with RUX. The safety profile was acceptable and manageable, with safety results to date consistent with those reported in previous trials of fedratinib. Sponsored by Sanofi. Disclosures: Harrison: Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis, Sanofi, YM Bioscience, Celgene, SBio, Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis, Sanofi, Shire: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, Sanofi, YM Bioscience, SBio, Gilead: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jourdan:Sanofi: Honoraria. Kiladjian:Novartis, Celgene, AOP Orphan: Research Funding; Novartis, Sanofi, AOP Orphan: Honoraria; Novartis, Sanofi, AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cervantes:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Novartis and Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Niederwieser:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy. Cortes:Incyte, Sanofi: Consultancy; Incyte, Sanofi: Research Funding. Passamonti:Novartis, Celgene, Incyte, Sanofi, Roche: Honoraria. Reiter:Sanofi: Honoraria. Heidel:Novartis Inc.: Honoraria; Novartis Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis Inc.: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Silver:Sanofi: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria. Winton:Sanofi: Research Funding. Gupta:Incyte, Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte, Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Gisslinger:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Sanofi, Shire, Celgene, Janssen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Sanofi, Shire, Celgene, Janssen: Honoraria. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Talpaz:Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ariad, Deciphera: Research Funding; Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ariad, Deciphera: Speakers Bureau. Zhang:Sanofi: Employment. Shi:Sanofi: Employment. Mesa:Incyte, Genentech, Lilly, MS Pharma, Gilead: Research Funding.

Prophylactic Dosing of Anti-Inhibitor Coagulant Complex (FEIBA) Reduces Bleeding Frequency In Hemophilia A Patients with Inhibitors: Results of the Pro-FEIBA Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 720-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy A. Leissinger ◽  
Eric Berntorp ◽  
Chiara Biasioli ◽  
Shannon Carpenter ◽  
Hyejin Jo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Allergic Reaction ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Bleeding Episodes

Abstract Abstract 720 Patients with congenital hemophilia and inhibitors are at increased risk for serious bleeding complications and progression to end-stage joint disease. Anecdotal reports and small case series suggest that regular doses of anti-inhibitor coagulant complex (AICC; FEIBA VH) may be effective in preventing bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors. The Pro-FEIBA study is the first prospective controlled clinical trial to study the efficacy of AICC in bleed prevention. Study Population and Design: The study was conducted in hemophilia A patients >2 years with a history of high-titer inhibitors who were using bypassing therapy for the treatment of bleeding episodes. Subjects on or planning immune tolerance therapy were excluded as were patients with thrombocytopenia or other bleeding disorders. This randomized, crossover study compared 6 months of AICC prophylactically dosed at 85 U/kg ± 15% on 3 nonconsecutive days per week (Prophy period) to 6 months of on-demand therapy (OD period) (target dose for the treatment of bleeds: 85 U/kg ± 15%). The 2 study periods were separated by a 3-month washout, during which time patients used on-demand therapy for bleeding. Patients were randomized to initially enter either the 6-month Prophy period or the 6-month OD period. Each patient then crossed-over to the alternate study period after a 3-month wash-out. Results: Thirty-four subjects were randomized; 26 subjects completed both study periods and were deemed evaluable per protocol (PP) for efficacy analysis of the primary outcome to compare bleeds in each 6-month treatment period. Eight subjects did not complete the study (1 patient in the Prophy treatment arm and 1 patient in the post-prophylaxis washout period died of complications associated with underlying illness and bleeding, 1 patient experienced an allergic reaction to study drug, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 4 patients withdrew from study). All randomized subjects were evaluated for safety. In the PP group, mean patient age was 26.9 years (median: 24.7; range: 2.8–67.9). In the total randomized group, mean patient age was 27.1 years (median: 28.7; range: 2.8–67.9). Of the 26 subjects who completed the study PP, 14 were randomized to enter the Prophy period first and then crossed-over to the OD period, while 12 subjects were initially randomized to enter the OD period and then crossed-over to the Prophy period. For the PP analysis, total bleeds and joint bleeds requiring treatment during the 2 study periods were compared (p-value is for the Wilcoxon signed-rank test of difference between OD and Prophy periods). In addition, bleeds for the 6-month period prior to enrollment were recorded retrospectively on study entry. Efficacy: Both total bleeds and joint bleeds were significantly reduced during the Prophy period as compared with the OD period (p < .0001) Table 1. There was no difference in bleed event rates based on randomization sequence (ie, no carry-over effect was detected when the Prophy period preceded the OD period). Safety: A total of 38 serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred, none of which was thrombotic in nature. One SAE was deemed by the study safety monitor to be related to the study drug (an allergic reaction). Otherwise, treatment was safe and well tolerated. Conclusion: These results in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors show that AICC, dosed at 85 IU/kg +/&minus; 15% given on 3 non-consecutive days each week was associated with a 62% reduction in all bleeds and a 61% reduction in joint bleeds as compared with on-demand therapy. Disclosures: Leissinger: Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: This is a report of a clinical trial using the Anti-Inhibitor Coagulant Complex, FEIBA, as prophylactic therapy to prevent bleeding in hemophilia patients with inhibitors. FEIBA is not currently licensed for use in prophylaxis in the US. Berntorp:Baxter: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Negrier:Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Rocino:Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Windyga:Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Gringeri:Baxter: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Nonacog Beta Pegol (N9-GP) for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Bleeding Episodes in Previously-Treated Patients with Hemophilia B: Results from an Extension Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2846-2846
Author(s):  
Guy Young ◽  
Peter W. Collins ◽  
Ramin Tehranchi ◽  
Ampaiwan Chuansumrit ◽  
Hideji Hanabusa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia B ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Bleeding Episodes ◽  
Extension Trial

Abstract Background: Prolongation technology has recently been employed to advance the treatment in hemophilia. Nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) is a glycoPEGylated recombinant factor IX (rFIX) with a significantly extended half-life in hemophilia B adults (Negrier et al. Blood 2011), up to 111 h, as compared to currently available treatment options. The pivotal phase 3 trial, paradigm™2, demonstrated that the prophylactic protection of 40 U/kg N9-GP once weekly significantly reduced the risk of bleeding as well as successfully controlled the bleeding episodes (Collins et al. JTH (Suppl.2) 2013). It also demonstrated a potential to improve clinical outcomes, reduce joint damage and improve quality of life with fewer injections. The phase 3 extension trial, paradigm™4, was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with N9-GP in severe and moderately severe hemophilia B patients. Aims: The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate immunogenicity of N9-GP. Key secondary objectives were to assess therapeutic and prophylactic efficacy and safety of N9-GP. Methods: 71 hemophilia B patients above 12 years of age with ≤2% FIX activity, with no history of inhibitors, at least 150 exposures days (ED) to other FIX products, and who completed the pivotal phase 3 trial, paradigm™2, or the pivotal surgery trial, paradigm™3, were included. The trial was approved by local IRB/REC and all participants signed an informed consent before any trial related activity. Patients were allowed to change the treatment regimen at trial start or during the trial based on their clinical manifestation and investigator recommendation; options included on-demand treatment, or once weekly prophylaxis with 10 or 40 U/kg N9-GP. Immunogenicity was evaluated as the primary endpoint; incidence of inhibitory antibodies against FIX defined as titer ≥0.6 Bethesda Units (BU). Efficacy endpoints included frequency of bleeds among prophylaxis patients, hemostatic response to N9-GP infusion based on a 4-point categorical scale, as well as FIX activity as a surrogate marker. Results: A total of 71 patients were treated for at least 12 months, 67 of whom received a prophylactic regimen of N9-GP either 10 U/kg or 40 U/kg once weekly; there were considerable movements between treatment arms, with approximately one third of the patients moving from on-demand or 10 U/kg at the start of this extension trial, up to 40 U/kg, with a smaller proportion moving from 40 U/kg to 10 U/kg, or from 10 U/kg to on-demand. None of the patients in the trial developed inhibitors. There were no differences relating to adverse events or standard safety parameters between the treatment groups. In paradigm™4 a total of 94.6% of all bleeding episodes were successfully treated, with 87.9% of all bleeding episodes treated with a single infusion. Among patients on prophylaxis, a median (IQR) annualized bleeding rate of 1.1 (0.0 – 2.2) episodes per year was observed. There was a higher proportion of traumatic bleeding episodes in the patients on 40 U/kg N9-GP compared with patients on 10 U/kg N9-GP (57.1% vs. 28.6%, respectively), though the annualized bleeding rates were similar in both prophylactic groups, with median (IQR) ABR of 0.0 (0.0 – 1.0) and 0.0 (0.0 – 1.1) in 10 U/kg and 40 U/kg N9-GP, respectively. For spontaneous bleeds only, the median (IQR) annualized bleeding rate was 1.1 (0.0 – 2.2) and 0.0 (0.0 – 1.0) among patients treated with 10 U/kg and 40 U/kg N9-GP, respectively. Conclusion: The outcome of the trial confirmed the results from paradigm™2 that N9-GP appeared to have a safe and well-tolerated profile with good prophylactic protection and control of bleeding. Disclosures Young: Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: N9-GP is not yet FDA approved. Information provided will discuss phase 3 clinical trial data.. Collins:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tehranchi:Novo Nordisk A/S: Employment, Shareholder Other. Chuansumrit:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria. Hanabusa:Baxter Healthcare, Novo Nordisk, Bayer, Pfizer, Biogen Idec and KaketsuKen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lentz:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mahlangu:Biogen Idec, Novo Nordisk, Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Amgen, Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer, Biogen Idec, Novo Nordisk: Research Funding. Mauser-Bunschoten:Sanquin, CSL Behring, Bayer, Baxter, Griffols, LFB, Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Sanquin, CSL Behring: Research Funding; Baxter: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Registration trial, Registration trial Other. Negrier:Novo Nordisk, Baxter, Bayer, CSL Behring, LFB and Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Oldenburg:Baxter, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Biotest, CSL-Behring, Grifols, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum and Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Santagostino:Pfizer, Bayer, Baxter, Novo Nordisk, CSL Behring, Grifols, Biotest: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Zak:Novo Nordisk A/S: Employment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document