scholarly journals Real Life Experience of Brentuximab Vedotin Plus CHP As First-Line Treatment in CD30 + Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4543-4543
Author(s):  
Domingo Domenech Eva ◽  
Juan-Manuel Sancho ◽  
Eva González-Barca ◽  
Nicholas Kelleher ◽  
Marta Rodriguez-Luaces ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Variable Expression ◽  
T Cell Lymphomas ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphomas

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a heterogeneous group of lymphomas classically treated with CHOP or CHOP-like regimens, with poor outcomes. CD30 is universally expressed and is pathognomonic in systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL), with variable expression among non-sALCL PTCL subtypes (40-60%). Recent data of frontline treatment with Brentuximab Vedotin (BV), an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody, plus CHOP has demonstrated significant improvement in survival (ECHELON-2 clinical trial), becoming the new standard of care for sALCL in Europe. PATIENT AND METHODS: From February 2019 to April 2021, 21 patients with de novo newly diagnosed CD30+ PTCL have been treated with the combination of BV-CHP, in the centers of the Catalan Institute of Oncology in Spain. Survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Clinical characteristics at diagnosis are shown in the table. Of interest, 5 of the 11 ALK negative ALCL patients were diagnosed of breast implant associated ALCL (BIA-ALCL) with extracapsular involvement. The number of cycles administrated were 108, with a median of 6 cycles per patient (range 1-6), all of them with G-CSF primary prophylaxis. At the time of this report, 1 patient was still on treatment and 2 patients without the final evaluation. Seven cycles (6%) were delayed (3 due to infection, 2 due to neutropenia grade 2, and 2 due to causes not related with chemotherapy).An adverse event was reported in 45 (44%) cycles, being the most frequent peripheral neuropathy in 14, nausea/vomiting in 9 and anemia in 8; all of them grade 1-2. Treatment was discontinued after 1 cycle in 1 patient due to progression. Of the 18 evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was of 83%, with 72% complete responses and 11% partial responses. Consolidative autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was performed in 5 patients. With a median follow-up of 14 months (limits: 1-24), 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 68.2% (95% CI 44.6-91.7) and 82.2% (95% CI 63.9-100), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Brentuximab Vedotin plus CHP is an effective regimen for CD30 positive PTCL, with a high rate of response. This combination presents a manageable safety profile, with the majority of patients completing the planned treatment. The incidence and severity of side effects are low, being peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia the most frequent. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Eva: Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Sancho: Roche, Janssen, Celgene-BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche, Janssen, Celgene-BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Incyte, Beigene: Speakers Bureau. González-Barca: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Travel; Takeda. Abbvie: Honoraria. Ribera: ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; SHIRE: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TAKEDA: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Sureda: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bluebird: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals A Pilot Study Using Nivolumab in Combination with Standard of Care Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2444-2444
Author(s):  
Brad Haverkos ◽  
Jasmine Zain ◽  
Manali Kamdar ◽  
Alexander Neuwelt ◽  
Steven M. Bair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
T Cell Lymphomas ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphomas

Abstract Introduction: The chemotherapy regimen dose adjusted (DA)-EPOCH (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide) is a first line option for peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs), but for most subtypes relapses are common and long-term outcomes are poor. Checkpoint blockade is an immunotherapeutic approach that has shown efficacy as a single agent in relapsed PTCLs. The combination of checkpoint blockade and cytotoxic chemotherapy can have additive or synergistic activity by increasing the expression of neoantigens and overcoming mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy such as weak tumor immunogenicity and an immune suppressive tumor microenvironment. Methods: We conducted a single arm, open-label clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the anti-PD1 antibody nivolumab (Nivo) in combination with DA-EPOCH in newly diagnosed PTCLs with ≥Stage II disease by Ann Arbor criteria. Pts were allowed to receive one cycle of chemotherapy prior to enrollment. Pts received Nivo (360 mg) followed by DA-EPOCH every 21 days for a planned six cycles unless treatment was stopped early for progression. For any immune related adverse event (irAE), Nivo was held until resolution to grade 1 and on ≤10mg prednisone. For serious grade 3-4 irAEs, Nivo was omitted with remaining DA-EPOCH cycles. DA-EPOCH was dose adjusted according to CALGB 50303 with the exception that pts could begin treatment at dose level -1 (i.e. 600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide), at investigator's discretion. Pts who received one cycle of chemotherapy prior to enrollment received five cycles of Nivo + DA-EPOCH. After completing six cycles of chemotherapy, pts had the option to proceed with consolidative autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) versus surveillance, according to patient/physician preference. Responses were assessed by PET/CT after 2 cycles of Nivo + DA-EPOCH and after the last cycle, using RECIL criteria. PFS events were defined as start of new treatment, progression, or death. Targeted next generation sequencing and multiplex immunohistochemistry of diagnostic tumor tissue are being performed. Results: We enrolled 18 pts: 4 angioimmunoblastic TCLs, 2 nodal PTCLs with T-follicular helper phenotype, 7 PTCL-NOS (not otherwise specified), 2 primary cutaneous gamma delta TCLs, 2 ALK negative anaplastic large cell lymphomas, and 1 subcutaneous panniculitis-like TCL who had progressed on methotrexate. Median age was 66 (range 43-77). International Prognostic Index (IPI) was high (4-5) in 50% (N=9), intermediate (2-3) in 33% (N=6), and low in 17% (N=3) of pts. Immune related AEs of all grades occurred in 78% (N=14) of pts and 39% (N=7) of pts experienced ≥grade 3 irAEs. 44% (N=8) of pts required discontinuation of Nivo due to irAEs. In the 8 pts whose irAEs resulted in discontinuation of Nivo, the irAE occurred prior to the second or third cycle of Nivo + DA-EPOCH. None of the 6 pts who received a cycle of anthracycline based chemotherapy prior to enrolling on trial experienced an irAE resulting in dose hold or discontinuation of Nivo, whereas 8 of 12 pts who did not receive a prior cycle of anthracycline based chemotherapy experienced an irAE requiring a dose hold or discontinuation of Nivo. The most common non-hematologic non-immune related ≥grade 2 AEs were related to infectious complications. Interim and end of induction overall response rates were 100% and 83%, respectively. We observed 10 CR, 5 PR, and 3 PD at the end of induction. There were 2 pts who received consolidation with ASCT. With a median follow up of 375 days (range 207-422), median modified PFS was 333 days (range 138-666) and median OS was not reached. The three pts with PD during induction were 2 PTCL-NOS (with a cytotoxic phenotype) and 1 AITL (with PD1+ tumor cells). Further correlative studies are ongoing to identify predictors of response. Discussion: In this pilot study using Nivo + DA-EPOCH for newly diagnosed PTCLs, we observed early immune related dose limiting AEs. Pts who received a cycle of anthracycline based chemotherapy prior to enrollment did not experience any dose limiting irAEs. We postulate that T-cell lymphoma pts are immunologically primed for irAEs, which can be mitigated by pre-treatment with chemotherapy. In a study in which half of pts were high risk by IPI, Nivo + DA-EPOCH led to encouraging high initial responses and lengthy responses in 2 PCGDTCL pts, thus warranting further investigation of this chemoimmunotherapeutic strategy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Haverkos: Viracta Therapeutics: Consultancy. Zain: Secura Bio, DaichiSankyo, Abbvie: Research Funding; Secura Bio, Ono , Legend, Kiyowa Kirin, Myeloid Therapeutics Verastem Daichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Kiyoaw Kirin, Secura Bio, Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Kamdar: KaryoPharm: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Celgene (BMS): Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; SeaGen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other; AbbVie: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genetech: Other. Smith: Syros: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Argenx: Research Funding. Porcu: Viracta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kiowa: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; DrenBio: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Increased Early Mortality after Fludarabine and Melphalan Conditioning with Peripheral Blood Grafts in Haploidentical SCT with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4496-4496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Eastburg ◽  
David A. Russler-Germain ◽  
Ramzi Abboud ◽  
Peter Westervelt ◽  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Early Mortality ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Equity Ownership

The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in the context of haploidentical stem cell transplant (haplo-SCT) has led to drastically reduced rates of Graft-vs-Host (GvH) disease through selective depletion of highly allo-reactive donor T-cells. Early trials utilized a reduced-intensity Flu/Cy/TBI preparative regimen and bone marrow grafts; however, relapse rates remained relatively high (Luznik et al. BBMT. 2008). This led to the increased use of myeloablative (MA) regimens for haplo-SCT, which have been associated with decreased relapse rates (Bashey et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013). Most studies have used a MA total body irradiation (TBI) based regimen for haplo-SCT. Preparative regimens using fludarabine and melphalan (FluMel), with or without thiotepa, ATG, and/or low dose TBI have also been reported using bone marrow grafts. Reports on the safety and toxicity of FluMel in the haplo-SCT setting with PTCy and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts are lacking. In this two-center retrospective analysis, the safety/toxicity of FluMel as conditioning for haplo-SCT was evaluated. We report increased early mortality and toxicity using standard FluMel conditioning and PBSC grafts for patients undergoing haplo-SCT with PTCy. 38 patients at the University of Rochester Medical Center and the Washington University School of Medicine underwent haplo-SCT with FluMel conditioning and PBSC grafts between 2015-2019. Outcomes were measured by retrospective chart review through July 2019. 34 patients (89.5%) received FluMel(140 mg/m2). Two patients received FluMel(100 mg/m2) and two patients received FluMel(140 mg/m2) + ATG. The median age at time of haplo-SCT was 60 years (range 21-73). 20 patients were transplanted for AML, eight for MDS, two for PMF, two for NHL, and five for other malignancies. The median Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) score was 4 (≥3 indicates high risk). 11 patients had a history of prior stem cell transplant, and 16 patients had active disease prior to their haplo-SCT. Seven patients had sex mismatch with their stem cell donor. Median donor age was 42 (range 21-71). 20 patient deaths occurred by July 2019 with a median follow up of 244 days for surviving patients. Nine patients died before day +100 (D100, "early mortality"), with a D100 non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate of 24%. Median overall and relapse free survival (OS and RFS, respectively) were 197 days (95% CI 142-not reached) and 180 days (95% CI 141-not reached), respectively, for the entire cohort. The 1 year OS and NRM were 29% and 50%. The incidence of grades 2-4cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 66%, and 52% of these patients were treated with tocilizumab. CRS was strongly associated with early mortality, with D100 NRM of 36% in patients with grade 2-4 CRS compared to 0% in those with grade 0-1. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was 64% in patients with grade 2-4 CRS, and 8% in those without (p < 0.001). 28% of patients with AKI required dialysis. Grade 2-4 CRS was seen in 54% of patients in remission prior to haplo-SCT and in 92% of those with active disease (p = 0.02). Of the 9 patients with early mortality, 89% had AKI, 44% needed dialysis, and 100% had grade 2-4 CRS, compared to 31%, 10%, and 55% in those without early mortality (p = 0.002, p = 0.02, p = 0.01). Early mortality was not significantly associated with age, HCT-CI score, second transplant, disease status at transplant, total dose of melphalan, volume overload/diuretic use, or post-transplant infection. In conclusion, we observed a very high rate of NRM with FluMel conditioning and PBSC grafts for haplo-SCT with PTCy. The pattern of toxicity was strongly associated with grade 2-4 CRS, AKI, and need for dialysis. These complications may be mediated by excessive inflammation in the context of allo-reactive donor T-cell over-activation. Consistent with this, multiple groups have shown that FluMel conditioning in haplo-SCT is safe when using bone marrow or T-cell depleted grafts. Based on our institutional experiences, we would discourage the use of FluMel as conditioning for haplo-SCT with PTCy with T-cell replete PBSC grafts. Alternative regimens or variations on melphalan-based regimens, such as fractionated melphalan dosing or inclusion of TBI may improve outcomes but further study and randomized controlled trials are needed. This study is limited in its retrospective design and sample size. Figure Disclosures DiPersio: WUGEN: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Cellworks Group, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NeoImmune Tech: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline Rx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Macrogenics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; RiverVest Venture Partners Arch Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liesveld:Onconova: Other: Data safety monitoring board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) and Lenalidomide (Len) in Relapsed and Refractory (r/r) Cutaneous (CTCL) and Peripheral (PTCL) T-Cell Lymphomas; A Planned Interim Analysis of Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2853-2853
Author(s):  
Basem M. William ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Amy Johnson ◽  
Jonathan E Brammer ◽  
John C. Reneau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Advisory Committees

Background: Patients with r/r tumor stage CTCL and/or PTCL have a poor prognosis. BV is currently FDA approved for CD30 positive CTCL and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) with single agent activity in additional PTCL subtypes. Len also has single agent activity in patients with r/r CTCL/PTCL. The safety of the combination was established in a phase I trial in patients with r/r diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Methods: We conducted a single-institution phase II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of BV+Len combination in patients with r/r CTCL/PTCL. Simon's 2-stage optimal design was followed to test the null hypothesis of overall response rate (ORR) ≤0.3 versus the alternative hypothesis of ORR≥0.5. Patients with ≥ 1 line of systemic therapy or 2 lines of skin directed therapy, at least stage IB (for CTCL), and no prior progression on BV were eligible regardless of CD30 staining. All patients were treated with BV 1.2 mg/kg IV and Len 20 mg PO daily q3 weeks for a maximum 16 cycles. After 7 patients were treated, we reduced Len to 10 mg given safety/tolerability concerns. Responses are assessed by the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas and the cutaneous lymphoma task force of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (ISCL/EORTC) Global response criteria (for CTCL) and Cheson year criteria (for PTCL). The effect of treatment on quality of life is assessed by Skindex-16. Results: As of July 1, 2019, 17 subjects were treated; 10 (59%) with mycosis fungoides (MF), 2 (12%) with Sezary syndrome (SS), 2 (12%) with CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder, and 3 (18%) with PTCL. Median age was 60 (49-90) years and 76% were males. CD30 was completely negative (<1%) in 3 (18%) of patients and median CD30 staining (by immunohistochemistry) was 7.5% (range 1-75%). Of 12 patients with MF/SS, 5 (42%) had evidence of large cell transformation at accrual. Of 14 patients with CTCL, median baseline mSWAT was 54.5 (range 4.4-190). Median number of prior therapies was 5 (range 1-9). Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 11/17 patients; including neutropenia (4), thrombocytopenia (1), bronchitis (1), dyspnea (1), abdominal pain (2), vertigo (1), , DRESS (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) syndrome (1), urinary tract infection (1), and tumor flare (2). Median number of cycles received was 4 (range 1-17). Best response in 14 evaluable patients were 2 (14%) complete response, 3 (21%) partial response, and 8 (57%) stable disease with ORR of 33% (95% confidence interval:12-62%). Of 17 patients, 5 (29%) remain on treatment, and 12 (71%) discontinued treatment because of disease progression (7; 58%), AEs (4; 33%), or patient preference (1; 2%). Median duration of response was 3.2 (range 2.5-13) months. Of note, 7/14 patients (50%) patients with CTCL had >50% reduction in their Skindex-16 scores after a median of 2 cycles (range 1-3). Conclusions: BV + Len is combination is safe and efficacious in a heavily pre-treated patients with T-cell lymphomas. Len doses higher than 10 mg daily are poorly tolerated and associated with excess tumor flare. Recruitment of both CTCL and PTCL patients for this trial is ongoing. Disclosures William: Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Consultancy; Defined Health: Consultancy; Techspert: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Brammer:Verastem, Inc: Research Funding; Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Bioniz Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Grantier:Pharmacyclics LLC and Janssen Oncology: Other: Advisory Board. Hoffman:Pharmacyclics LLC and Janssen Oncology: Other: Advisory Board. Baiocchi:Prelude: Consultancy. Epperla:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Speakers Bureau. Christian:Triphase: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding. Maddocks:BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Brentuximab vedotin is being used off-label for CD30 negative peripheral and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Lenalidomide is being used off-label for both conditions (within a phase II clinical trial)

scholarly journals A Phase I/II Trial of Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) Plus Rituximab (R) As Frontline Therapy for Patients with Immunosuppression-Associated CD30+ and/or EBV+ Lymphomas

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 351-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Pearse ◽  
Barbara Pro ◽  
Leo I. Gordon ◽  
Reem Karmali ◽  
Jane N. Winter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Lymphoid Malignancies ◽  
Frontline Therapy

Background: Immunocompromised patients (pts) face an approximate 6-fold increase in lifetime risk of lymphoid malignancies compared with immunocompetent counterparts. Additionally, up to 80% of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) cases are driven by EBV-associated mechanisms of tumorigenesis. Approximately 70% will express CD30 and over 80% will express CD20. Recent studies of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) have reported median overall survival (OS) of 2-4 years and treatment-related mortality (TRM) rates of 13-50%. Moreover, solid organ transplant (SOT) pts are at significant risk of graft rejection when CIT is employed, possibly due to "off target" depletion of regulatory T-cell populations. R monotherapy induction, followed by response-stratified use of CIT, has been evaluated (Trappe, et al, JCO, 2016). However, ~75% of pts had an inadequate response to R alone and required subsequent CIT; 2-yr OS for the population as a whole was ~70%. BV is an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate that received accelerated FDA approval for previously untreated CD30+ T-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. We hypothesized that a combination of BV and R would yield improved breadth and depth of response compared with R monotherapy induction, would spare pts subsequent exposure to CIT, and result in favorable OS. Methods: We report here results of a phase I/II multicenter study investigating the efficacy and safety of BV+R as frontline therapy in pts diagnosed with immunosuppression-associated CD30+ and/or EBV+ lymphoid malignancies. Induction consisted of R 375 mg/m2 given days 1, 8, 15, 22 and BV 1.2 mg/kg given days 1, 8, 15, of a 28-day cycle, followed by restaging. Those with progression were removed from study. Pts with stable disease were offered study discontinuation or completion of one consolidation cycle followed by repeat disease assessment. Pts with partial response or complete response (CR) could receive either consolidation followed by maintenance therapy (MT) or move directly to MT without consolidation. Consolidation was identical to induction dosing; MT consisted of BV 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks and R 375 mg/m2 every 6 weeks for up to 1 year of therapy. Toxicity was defined using CTCAE 4.0 and response (Cheson, 2007) was assessed at the end of induction, consolidation (if given), and after cycles 4 and 7 of BV. Results: A total of 22 pts were entered in the trial. Toxicity and response data are available for 20 pts. Median age was 67 years (range, 30-79) and 14 pts (64%) were male (range, 30-79 years). Fourteen pts (64%) had received either a SOT or hematopoietic allograft requiring immunosuppression, 3 pts required immunosuppression for underlying rheumatologic conditions, and 3 pts were found to have EBV-associated lymphoid malignancies in the absence of iatrogenic immunosuppression (Table 1). Overall response rate was 70%, including a CR rate of 60%. With median follow-up of 26.1 month, the probability of progression-free survival at 1 year was 75.2% and 67.6% at 3 years (Fig 1). Probability of OS was 89.2% at both 1-year and 3-year follow-up (Fig 1). Median time to best response was 28 days. Three pts withdrew consent after induction, 2 pts died (1 death related to treatment), and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Seven pts (31%) required dose adjustments or delay of medication administration during induction therapy and 45% required discontinuation of therapy due to toxicity within 1 year. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and pancreatitis. The most frequent adverse events of any grade were fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, pancytopenia, and peripheral neuropathy (Table 2). Conclusions: The combination of BV + R had an acceptable safety profile and appeared effective in achieving early remissions when used as frontline therapy for PTLD and other immunosuppression-related lymphomas. Specifically, over half of pts achieved CR, and 75% have been spared exposure to multi-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy. Furthermore, survival and PFS data were encouraging compared with historical controls. However, nearly half of pts discontinued therapy within 1 year due to toxicity suggesting poor long-term tolerance of the regimen and that earlier cessation of therapy may be warranted. Further studies are needed to confirm these efficacy results and to determine optimal BV+R dosing regimens and durations. Disclosures Pro: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gordon:Gilead: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Juno/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Zylem LLC: Other: co-founder; research in nanoparticles in cancer. Karmali:Gilead/Kite; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Speakers Bureau; Takeda, BMS: Other: Research Funding to Institution. Winter:Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ma:Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Xeme: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Beigene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Behdad:Pfizer: Other: Speaker; Thermo Fisher: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Loxo-Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Petrich:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Smith:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Phase 1/2 Study of Oral MLN9708, A Novel, Investigational Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 479-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesus G. Berdeja ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
Ai-Min Hui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitor ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Abstract 479 Background: MLN9708 is an investigational, oral, potent, reversible, and specific 20S proteasome inhibitor, which immediately hydrolyzes to MLN2238, the biologically active dipeptidyl leucine boronic acid. In preclinical studies, MLN2238 has shown faster proteasome dissociation and greater tissue penetration than bortezomib. Current phase 1 data indicate that oral administration of single-agent MLN9708 was generally well tolerated, with no grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy, and showed signs of antitumor activity in some patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone demonstrated a 100% partial response or better (≥PR) rate in patients with previously untreated MM, providing the rationale for evaluating oral MLN9708 in place of bortezomib in this combination. Here we report phase 1 data from the first combination study of MLN9708 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01217957). Methods: Primary phase 1 objectives were to determine the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly MLN9708 in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone; secondary objectives included characterization of the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of MLN9708, assessment of PK interaction and response. Adults aged ≥18 years with ECOG performance status of 0 to 2, and adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function were eligible. Patients with grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy or prior/concurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary embolism were excluded. Patients received oral MLN9708 weekly on days 1, 8, and 15, lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1–21, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, for up to twelve 28-day cycles. Patients received thromboprophylaxis with aspirin or low molecular weight heparin. Transplant-eligible patients could undergo stem cell transplant after six cycles. MLN9708 dose escalation, from a starting dose of 1.68 mg/m2, followed a 3+3 scheme based on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Response was assessed according to modified EBMT criteria. Results: At data cut-off (June 29, 2011), 10 patients have been enrolled and treated: three each at 1.68, 2.23, and 2.97 mg/m2 and one at 3.95 mg/m2; median age was 66 years (range 59–77). Patients completed a median of 3 cycles (range 1–6), with three having received 6 cycles; treatment is ongoing in six patients. A DLT of grade 3 fainting was observed in a patient treated at 3.95 mg/m2. The MTD has not yet been reached; the current cohort is receiving 3.95 mg/m2. Drug-related AEs included rash in four patients (two maculopapular, two erythematous); vomiting and fatigue in three patients each; and diarrhea, constipation, and nausea in two patients each. Grade 1 treatment-related peripheral neuropathy was reported in one patient. Serious AEs were seen in four patients: one at 3.95 mg/m2 (DLT of grade 3 fainting), one at 2.23 mg/m2 (grade 3 DVT) unrelated to MLN9708, and two unrelated at 1.68 mg/m2 (grade 3 hypotension; grade 3 gastrointestinal hemorrhage resulting in discontinuation). Two patients required lenalidomide dose reductions to 15 mg due to erythematous rash; no dose reductions were required for MLN9708 or dexamethasone. There were no on-study deaths. Of nine response-evaluable patients, all nine achieved ≥PR, including three very good PR (VGPR) and one complete response. Time to response was rapid; all responders achieved a ≥50% decrease in M-protein in cycle 1, and best response was reached by the end of cycle 4. No patient has progressed to date. One patient with confirmed VGPR discontinued at cycle 6 to undergo stem cell transplant. Conclusions: MLN9708 administered weekly in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone appears to be generally well tolerated in previously untreated MM patients at the MLN9708 dose levels studied, with evidence of antitumor activity in the dose-escalation cohorts. Evaluation continues to determine the MTD of MLN9708 in this combination. Updated results, PK data, assessment of PK interaction, and PD data will be presented. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Use of the investigational agent MLN9708 for the treatment of previously untreated multiple myeloma. Richardson:Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lonial:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding. Hui:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Berg:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Gupta:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Liu:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Di Bacco:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Kumar:Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Prolonged Treatment with Brentuximab Vedotin (SGN-35) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) or Systemic Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (sALCL),

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3711-3711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
R. Brian Berryman ◽  
Ranjana H. Advani ◽  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Robert W. Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Extension Study ◽  
Prolonged Treatment ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 3711 Background: Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) comprises an anti-CD30 antibody conjugated by a protease-cleavable linker to the potent antimicrotubule agent, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). Trials with brentuximab vedotin have previously reported results in patients with relapsed or refractory HL or sALCL. In a pivotal HL trial, complete remissions (CRs) were observed in 35 of 102 patients (34%) with a median duration of 20.5 months (Chen 2011). Thirty-three of 58 patients (57%) with sALCL achieved CRs with a median duration of 13.2 months in a phase 2 trial (Pro 2011). In both of these studies, a maximum of 16 cycles was permitted; patients with HL received a median of 10 cycles and those with sALCL, 7 cycles. This case series presents a retrospective analysis on a subset of patients who have received prolonged treatment (>16 cycles) with brentuximab vedotin in a treatment-extension study (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00947856). Methods: Brentuximab vedotin 1.2 or 1.8 mg/kg was administered every 3 weeks as a 30-minute outpatient IV infusion for up to 16 cycles of treatment in 1 of 4 preceding studies. Consecutive cycles of treatment were then administered in the extension study until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Antitumor activity in this case series was based on objective response assessments per the investigator according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results: Fifteen patients have received >16 consecutive cycles of treatment with brentuximab vedotin. The median age of patients was 35 years (range 14–74); 9 patients were female. Patients had relapsed or refractory CD30-positive HL (10) or sALCL (5) and had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range 1–14). Nine patients had previously failed autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), and 2 of these patients had additionally failed an allogeneic SCT. The median number of treatment cycles was 19 (range 17–29). At the time of the analysis, 2 patients had discontinued treatment; neither patient had discontinued due to an adverse event (AE). AEs among patients were generally mild, which enabled continued treatment beyond the initial study. Across all cycles of treatment, AEs in >30% of patients were peripheral sensory neuropathy (73%), fatigue (53%), upper respiratory tract infection (53%), cough (40%), alopecia, diarrhea, neutropenia, and pyrexia (33% each). The only AE which occurred for the first time after Cycle 16 in more than 1 patient was neutropenia (n=2). Peripheral neuropathy events (by Standardised MedDRA Query) of Grade 1 or 2 were experienced by 87% of patients; no Grade 3 or 4 events of peripheral neuropathy were observed. Peripheral neuropathy was managed with dose reductions and dose delays; resolution or improvement of peripheral neuropathy was observed in over half of the patients (7 of 13) with a median time to resolution or improvement of 3.1 weeks (range 0.1–8). Best clinical responses in patients were 11 CRs, including CRs achieved by all 5 patients with sALCL, 2 partial remissions (PRs), and 2 patients with stable disease. Four of 11 patients evolved from a PR to achieve a CR; the median time from first dose to achievement of CR was 12 weeks (range 5.4–48.9). The median duration of objective response has not been reached; the durations ranged from 6.5+ to 21.8+ months. At the time of the analysis, 14 patients were alive and free of documented progression, and the median progression-free survival had not been reached (range 11.8+ to 23+ months). Conclusions: Among patients with relapsed or refractory HL or sALCL who have enrolled in a treatment-extension study, 15 have received >16 consecutive cycles of treatment with brentuximab vedotin. The safety profile of brentuximab vedotin did not meaningfully change with treatment beyond 16 cycles. Durations of response (11 CR and 2 PR) ranged from 6.5+ to 21.8+ months, with 13 patients still receiving treatment. Updated safety and durability of response will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Forero-Torres: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) comprises an anti-CD30 antibody conjugated by a protease-cleavable linker to the potent antimicrotubule agent, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). It is an investigational agent that is being studied in CD30+ malignancies. Berryman:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Gloucester Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Advani:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bartlett:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Travel Expenses. Chen:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Travel Expenses. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gopal:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Piramal: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Calistoga: Research Funding; Abbott: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; SBIO: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Cellular Therapeutics Inc.: Speakers Bureau. O'Connor:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allos: Consultancy, Research Funding; Purdue Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding. Olshefski:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Smith:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Spectrum: Consultancy; GSK: Speakers Bureau. Grove:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Equity Ownership; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment. Matous:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau.

A Phase II Study Of Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, Vincristine and Prednisone (CEOP) Alternating With Pralatrexate (P) As Front Line Therapy For Patients With Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL): Preliminary Results From The T- Cell Consortium Trial

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3044-3044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjana H. Advani ◽  
Stephen M. Ansell ◽  
Mary J Lechowicz ◽  
Anne W Beaven ◽  
Fausto R. Loberiza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphomas ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract Background Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL) characterized by poor treatment outcomes with conventional chemotherapy, including CHOP [complete remission (CR) ∼40%]. Retrospective studies suggest that the incorporation of etoposide into chemotherapy regimens may improve outcomes compared to CHOP. In contrast, anthracyclines appear to have a limited role in PTCL, largely attributed to p-glycoprotein related resistance. Pralatrexate was the first drug approved for patients (pts) with relapsed PTCL, providing a rationale to evaluate it in the front-line setting. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of a novel combination for the primary therapy of pts with PTCL whereby the anthracycline in CHOP backbone was replaced with etoposide (CEOP) alternating with pralatrexate (P). Methods Pts > 18 years (yrs) with PTCL stages II-IV with no prior therapy and adequate end organ function were eligible. Eligible histologies included, PTCL-NOS, AILT, ALCL (ALK positive pts only allowed if IPI >3). CEOP (Cycle A) was administered as: cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV d1, etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV d1-3 (or 100 mg/m2 IV d1 and 200 mg/m2 PO days 2-3), vincristine 2 mg IV day 1 and prednisone 100 mg/day X 5 alternating with P (cycle B) 30 mg/m2 IV d 15, 22 and 29 (with vitamin B12 and folate supplementation). Growth factors were used to support both cycles of therapy. Imaging to assess response was done after cycle 2B, 4B and 6B. Pts achieving a remission were eligible for consolidative autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) after cycle 4B at physician discretion. The primary statistical aim was to improve the CR rate from 40 to 63% with CEOP-P and optional transplant. Secondary objectives included assessment of event free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of the regimen. A two-stage Simon design (alpha=0.10, 90% power) tested the null hypothesis that the CR rate would be </= to 40%. For the first stage of 20 evaluable pts, the trial would be terminated if 8 or fewer pts experienced a CR after course 2B of chemotherapy. For the second stage, a total of 34 pts were required with at least 17 achieving a CR at the end of therapy to consider the regimen useful. Results 34 pts were enrolled and one withdrew consent before starting therapy, leaving 33 pts enrolled between 7/2011 and 1/2013. Characteristics are shown in Table 1. 27 pts received at least 2 cycles of therapy. 6 pts received only 1 cycle due to early disease progression in 4 and adverse events in 2. Grade 3-4 toxicities attributed to therapy included, anemia (27%), thrombocytopenia (12%), febrile neutropenia (18%), mucositis (18%), sepsis (15%), increased creatinine (12%) and liver transaminases (12%). At the end of stage 1, 10 of 20 pts (50%) achieved a CR; therefore accrual proceeded to stage 2. At the time of this initial analysis, the overall response rate is 70%. To date 15 pts (45%) have achieved a CR with two additional pts pending evaluation. Overall, the 1-yr EFS is 48% (95% CI 28-64), and 1-yr OS 70% (95% CI 47-84) (Figures 1 and 2). 6 pts (18%) to date (n=3 CR, n=2 PR and 1 with stable disease) have received consolidation with ASCT and all are in CR post-transplant. Pts who proceeded to ASCT were younger than the non-transplant cohort (median age 58 versus 64 yrs) with other clinical characteristics being similar. On exploratory bivariate analyses, age <60 yrs, absence of B symptoms, low IPI score (0,1), achieving a CR, and receiving a ASCT were associated with better EFS. Attaining a CR was the only factor associated with better OS and was highest in patients with low IPI (78%) and those with ALCL histology (75%). Conclusions CEOP-P met the pre-defined stage 1 response criteria. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact on the final CR rate and secondary objectives of EFS and OS. Defining optimal front line therapy in PTCL continues to be a challenge and an unmet need. Disclosures: Advani: Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Pralatrexate is currently only approved for relapsed/refractory PTCL. Lechowicz:Allos Therapeutics: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Carson:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Foss:merck: Research Funding; spectrum: Research Funding; eisai: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; seattle genetics: Research Funding. Horwitz:Celgene : Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharamaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirn Pharma: Consultancy; Genzyme : Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pro:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Pinter-Brown:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria. Smith:Micromet: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Allos: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Shustov:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria. Savage:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Vose:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Frontline Treatment of CD30+ Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas with Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with CHP: 3-Year Durability and Survival Follow-up

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1537-1537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M Horwitz ◽  
Andrei R. Shustov ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Nancy L Bartlett ◽  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Frontline Treatment ◽  
Multi Agent

Abstract Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) encompass a subset of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Many PTCL tumor cells express the surface marker CD30, including systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) where CD30 is uniformly expressed. Multi-agent chemotherapy regimens provide inadequate long-term outcomes: complete remission (CR) rates range from 39-53% and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates are 12-49%, depending on subtype. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and OS rates are approximately 30% and <40% (excluding anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK] -positive), respectively (Vose 2008; Reimer 2009; D'Amore 2012). A phase 1 trial evaluated brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS®; BV), a CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate, in sequence with CHOP or in combination with CHP (CHOP without vincristine) in treatment-naive pts with PTCL, including systemic ALCL (Fanale 2014; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01309789). We are presenting updated durability data and peripheral neuropathy resolution from the combination-therapy arm of this trial. Methods: The analysis set consisted of patients who received the combination treatment (tx) regimen (BV+CHP; 6 cycles, q3wk, IV). Patients who achieved at least a partial remission (PR) following BV + CHP could subsequently receive up to 10 additional cycles of single-agent BV (1.8 mg/kg q3wk). ALK+ systemic ALCL pts must have had an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score ≥2. Antitumor response assessments were per investigator according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Efficacy endpoints included PFS and OS, which were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Results: Twenty-six pts received BV + CHP combination treatment. Diagnoses included systemic ALCL (n=19; 3ALK+, 16 ALK-), peripheral T-cell lymphoma-NOS (n=2), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (n=2), adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (n=2), and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (n=1). The objective response rate to tx was 100% and CR rate was 88%. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with a severity of at least Grade 3 (≥10% incidence) were febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, anemia and pulmonary embolism with 73% reporting any grade peripheral neuropathy. At the time of this analysis, 20 pts remained on study for long term follow-up (LTFU). The median observation time from first dose was 38.7 months (range, 4.6 to 44.3). The 3-year OS rate was 80% (95% CI: 59, 91 months) and the median PFS was not reached (95% CI: 12.3, -). Twenty one pts received a median of 10 doses (range, 1 to 10) of BV post BV-CHP. Nine/19 (47%) ALCL and 5/7 (71%) non-ALCL pts have not experienced disease progression or death. A Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Query (SMQ) was performed for peripheral neuropathy (PN). Eighteen of 19 (95%) patients who received combination therapy experienced either complete resolution (n=7, 37%) or improvement by at least 1 grade level (n=11, 58%) in neuropathy symptoms. There were a total of 44 PN events of which 23 (52%) resolved and 14 (32%) improved. Five pts (19%) who experienced disease progression after completing treatment received subsequent treatment with BV in LTFU, and 3 patients received stem cell transplants (1 autologous, 2 allogenic). There were no patients who received a consolidative stem cell transplant in first remission. Conclusions: Durable remissions were observed with BV in combination with CHP in newly diagnosed pts with PTCL. After over 3 years of follow-up, clinical outcomes compare favorably with historical data in PTCL pts. An ongoing randomized trial with 450 pts is comparing BV+CHP with CHOP for the frontline treatment of CD30+ PTCL (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01777152). Final resultsfrom this trial are expected in 2017 to 2018. Progression-Free Survival: Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with CHP Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Off Label Use: Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is indicated in the US for treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma after failure of autologous stem cell transplant or after failure of at least two prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens in patients who are not ASCT candidates and for the treatment of patients with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma after failure of at least one prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen. This study evaluates the use of brentuximab vedotin as a frontline treatment in patients with systemic ALCL or CD30-positive mature T-cell and NK-cell neoplasms in combination with multiagent chemotherapy.. Shustov:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Bartlett:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Colgene: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Insight: Research Funding; MERC: Research Funding; Dynavax: Research Funding; Idera: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; LAM Theapeutics: Research Funding. Advani:Genetech: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Pro:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses. Chen:Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Davies:Takeda: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Illidge:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Huebner:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kennedy:Seattle Genetics,Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Fanale:Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Infinity: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Whole Genome Sequencing Reveals Recurrent Structural Driver Events in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas Not Otherwise Specified

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4115-4115
Author(s):  
Francesco Maura ◽  
Niccolò Bolli ◽  
Daniel Leongamornlert ◽  
Cristiana Carniti ◽  
Anna Dodero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
The Other ◽  
Driver Mutations ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Not Otherwise Specified ◽  
T Cell Lymphomas ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphomas

Abstract Historically, the differential diagnosis between different nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) subtypes based on morphological and phenotypic grounds has posed great challenges. In the last few years, our knowledge of the molecular bases of different PTCLs has significantly expanded. However, peripheral T-cell lymphomas not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOSs) are still regarded to as a heterogeneous category encompassing PTCL cases not fitting other, more homogeneous, subtypes. In fact, PTCL-NOS is one of the few lymphoma subtypes where no recurrent driver mutations have been reported so far. In order to better characterized the PTCL-NOS genomic landscape, we decided to investigate 11 PTCL-NOS patients by a whole genome sequencing (WGS) approach (median coverage 27X). Ten out of eleven samples were collected from FFPE blocks and 2 were removed from analysis: one due to low cancer cell fraction (CCF) and the other based on cluster generation issues during sequencing likely caused by a hyper-fragmented DNA. Among the remaining 9 cases, we extracted 59,617 somatic base substitutions (range 2,471-10,756, median 6,358 per patient) and 20,531 small insertion-deletions (indels) (range 84-6,397, median 1,580). We were able to characterize the spectrum of FFPE-induced artefacts, mostly composed of point mutations and indels within LINE-1 (L1) elements, predominantly of the L1PA family. This is a crucial quality control step that could be applied to similar future studies from archive samples. Four samples were heavily involved by FFPE-related artefacts and were excluded for this reason. Using a non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF) algorithm we investigated for the first time the PTCL-NOS mutational signature landscape. We did not find novel processes in this entity, but rather known processes operative in other lymphoid malignancies. Among those: signatures 1 and 5, deriving from the age-related process of spontaneous deamination of methylated cytosines; signatures 2 and 13 deriving from aberrant activity of the APOBEC family of DNA deaminases; signatures 17 and 8, pertaining to two yet poorly characterized processes. The contribution of different processes to the mutational spectrum of each case was profoundly heterogeneous. Combining our data set with 64 previously published whole exome sequencing cases (23 ALCL, 15 AITLs, 9 PTCL-NOSs and 16 EATL-II), we confirmed the lack of recurrent driver mutations among PTCL-NOS. Taking advantage of WGS data, we therefore focused on structural variants (SVs: inversions, translocations, internal tandem duplications and deletions) and copy number alterations (CNAs). We found 372 SVs, with a stunning median of 73 per sample (range 56-86). Even more interesting, at least one complex event was observed in all but one patients, including one whole genome duplication (WGD) and five chromothripsis events in three patients, suggesting a critical role of SVs in shaping the PTCL-NOS genome. We found that known onco-drivers were recurrently disrupted by such events: the most frequent target was CDKN2A, deleted in 4 out of 5 patients, 2 of which carried homozygous deletions. Interestingly, PTEN loss was observed in 2 out of 4 CDKN2A-deleted patients. Given the high prevalence of these deletions, we extended our observation to an independent validation set of ALCLs (n=56), AITL (n=22) and PTCL-NOS (n=59) investigated by FISH (n=36), next generation sequencing (n=25) or SNP6 array series (n=76). Overall, CDKN2A was deleted in 22/59 (37%) PTCL-NOSs cases, and in 17/22 (77%) both alleles were lost. PTEN was deleted in 12/59 (20%) PTCL-NOS cases, all of which also carried a CDKN2A loss. Strikingly, the co-occurrence of CDKN2A and PTEN was found only among PTCL-NOS, and in none of the other entities. With the limitations of the small sample size, the presence of CDKN2A bi-allelic deletions was associated with inferior survival (25% [95% CI: 9-66%] 5-y OS for deleted cases vs 52% [95% CI: 28-96%] for wt/hemizygous cases, p=0.042) among patients treated with an autologous bone marrow transplant front line program for advance stage and high-risk disease (n=19). Our observations point at SVs as a main driver of PTCL-NOS, often involving known cancer genes and their downstream pathways. Furthermore, our data highlighted recurrent gene deletions that may be relevant for differential diagnosis within this category of lymphomas. Disclosures Bolli: Celgene: Honoraria. Chiappella:Roche: Other: lecture fees; Amgen: Other: lecture fees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: lecture fees; Nanostring: Other: lecture fees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: lecture fees; Teva: Other: lecture fees. Corradini:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Sandoz: Other: Advisory Board; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Lecturer.

scholarly journals Trial-in-Progress: Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with Lenalidomide and Rituximab in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Christopher A. Yasenchak ◽  
Robert B. Sims ◽  
Grzegorz S. Nowakowski
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Of Origin ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Car T

Background Majority of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who relapse after HSCT, or who are not candidates for HSCT have poor outcomes and are in need of novel therapies. Preclinical data provides a strong rationale for combining brentuximab vedotin, lenalidomide, and rituximab in the treatment of R/R DLBCL. In a phase 1 trial, 37 subjects with R/R DLBCL were treated with brentuximab vedotin in combination with lenalidomide. The objective response rate (ORR) (proportion of subjects with complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) for all subjects was 56.7% (21 of 37 subjects). For the CD30-positive population, the ORR was 73.3% (11 of 15 subjects), whereas the ORR for the CD30 &lt;1% population was 45.6% (10/22). The median follow-up time was 14.3 months (range: 1 to 56.7 months). The median duration of remission for subjects with CR or PR was 13.2 months (range: 3.2 to 55.2 months). For subjects with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) &gt;6 months, the median duration of remission was 11.70 months (range: 3.2 to 55.2 months). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) results appear similar in both the CD30-positive and CD30 &lt;1% groups. The PFS in the combined population is 10.2 months and the median OS is 14.2 months (manuscript in preparation). Study Design and Methods This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active-comparator, multicenter phase 3 study designed to evaluate the efficacy of brentuximab vedotin in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab versus placebo in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab for the treatment of subjects with R/R DLBCL (NCT04404283). Key eligibility criteria include the following: subjects aged 18 and older with R/R DLBCL with an eligible subtype; subjects must have ≥2 prior lines of therapy and must be ineligible for, or have declined, stem cell transplant, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy; subjects must have an ECOG performance status score of 0 to 2; subjects must have a fluorodeoxyglucose-avid disease by PET and bidimensional measurable disease of at least 1.5 cm by CT, as assessed by the site radiologist. Subjects (n=400) will be randomized 1:1 to receive either brentuximab vedotin or placebo in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab and will be stratified by CD30 expression (positive [≥1%] versus &lt;1%), prior allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplant therapy (received or not), prior CAR-T therapy (received or not), and cell of origin (germinal-center B-cell-like (GCB) or non-GCB). Cell of origin (GCB or non-GCB) will be histologically determined by local pathology assessment. Disease response will be assessed by a blinded independent central review (BICR) and the investigator according to the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System. Radiographic disease evaluations, including contrast-enhanced CT scans and PET/CT, will be assessed at baseline, then every 6 weeks from randomization for 12 months, then every 12 weeks (±3 days). PET/CTs will be discontinued if negative. For the primary efficacy analyses of PFS per BICR in the intent-to-treat population and in CD30-positive subjects, the stratified log-rank test will be used to compare PFS between the 2 treatment groups. The hazard ratio will be estimated using a stratified Cox regression model. PFS will also be summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method. Similar methods will be used for the secondary efficacy endpoint of OS, and other time-to-event efficacy endpoints. The trial will have sites open in the US and multiple countries in Europe and Asia, with enrollment planning to begin in the second half of 2020. Disclosures Bartlett: Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; BTG: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Affimed Therapeutics: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Autolus: Research Funding. Yasenchak:Takeda: Honoraria; BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sims:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Travel expenses. Nowakowski:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Denovo: Consultancy; Kymera: Consultancy; Ryvu: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Nanostrings: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document