Onset of Blast Crises in CML Patients in Treatment-Free Remission: Descriptive Analysis of 4 Cases

Abstract Aims: The onset of blast crisis (BC) in initially chronic phase (CP) CML patients that entered treatment-free remission (TFR) after TKI is an exceptional event, however, there is emerging evidence that this may occur in such patients (pts), although the pathogenesis remains unclear to date. Methods: Anonymous clinical case retrospective data collection from patients' datafiles, after written agreement of living patients, centralisation of available frozen nucleic acid collection from diagnosis and from blast crisis and reanalysis by Next-Generation Sequencing of samples (ASXL1, ASXL2, BCOR, CALR, CBL, CEBP alpha , CSF3R, DNMT3A, EP300, ETNK1, ETV6, EZH2, FLT3, GATA2, IDH1, IDH2 JAK2, KIT, , KRAS,MPL, NPM1, NRAS, PHF6, PTPN11 , RAD2, RUNX1, SETBP1, SF3B1, SH2B3, SMC1A, SMC3, SRSF2, STAG1, STAG2, TET2, TP53, U2AF1, WT1 and ZRSR2 genes analysed) on Illumina platform. CNV analysis were performed using VisCAp or in-house pipelines and/or by Multiplex Ligation Dependant Probe Amplification (MLPA). ABL1 tyrosine kinase domain mutations were screened by NGS on cDNA or directly on DNA. BCR-ABL1 transcripts are expressed in % (IS) with at least 32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. All patients discontinued their TKI after 2 years of MR4.5 and a TKI was resumed in case of MMR loss. Results: Along 15-year experience of TFR in our country and ≥ ~800 patients experiencing a TKI cessation attempt, informations from 4 (~0.5%) TFR CML patients entering BC have been collected. All patients harboured Major BCR transcripts. The chronic phase characteristics are mentioned in Table 1. All these long-lasting CP CML pts were ELTS risk score low, and 1 was harbouring ACA at diagnosis. One pt was mutated for ASXL2 and 2 mutations for EP300, found again at BC. Three pts had IFN-a prior to imatinib for all. Three out of 4 lost their MMR after a first cessation attempt at 12, 10 and 3 months after cessation. Pt #1 experienced a 2 nd cessation attempt 52 months after re-initiation of TKIs and entered lymphoid BC 6 months after a second resumption of TKI for a 2 nd MMR loss. The BC characteristics are mentioned in Table 2. Three out of 4 BC were lymphoid, one had ACA different from those at CP diagnosis. Two pts explored had multiple mutations in Runx1, U2AF1, EP300 and ASXL2 genes, not present at CP diagnosis, in addition to multiple ABL1 mutations in 2 out of 4 pts (2 T315I, 3 P-Loop mutations). All pts underwent chemotherapy + various TKI leading to complete remission (CR) in all and 3 out of 4 pts could be allotransplanted in CR, one relapsed shortly after transplant, and a second one 34 months after transplant. Overall 3 pts are alive with 1 in controlled relapse. Conclusions: The onset of BC after TFR for sustained deep molecular response remains an exceptional event and is probably not induced by this therapeutic procedure. These 4 cases underline the need for a sustained long-lasting molecular follow-up of pts in TFR, although the majority of these BC seem sudden. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bauduer: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Rea: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; Sun Pharma Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kartos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Maintaining Imatinib ≥600 Mg Daily in the First 12 Months of Chronic Phase CML Treatment Is Associated with Superior Event-Free Survival at 5 Years.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1125.1125 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1125-1125 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Michael P Osborn ◽

Susan Branford ◽

Deborah L White ◽

John F Seymour ◽

Ruth Columbus ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Blast Crisis ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Event Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Event Rates

Abstract Abstract 1125 Poster Board I-147 The Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group conducted a trial (TIDEL I) in 103 patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML, using imatinib 600 mg/day with dose escalation to 800 mg/day for suboptimal response. This was defined as failure to achieve (1) complete haematological response (CHR) at 3 months, (2) major cytogenetic response (MCR) at 6 months, (3) complete cytogenetic response (CCR) or molecular equivalent at 9 months, or (4) less than 0.01% (IS) BCR-ABL by RQ-PCR at 12 months. Here we report the outcomes with all surviving patients having been treated for at least 60 months. We aimed to determine whether the patient outcome at 60 months was predicted by the molecular response within the first 18 months of imatinib therapy. The outcomes for patients maintaining a dose of imatinib of ≥600 mg/day in the first 12 months was compared to those who were on a reduced dose for at least part of this time. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as death from any cause, accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC), and loss of CHR, MCR or CCR. The 103 patients included 66 males and 37 females with a median (±SD) age of 49 (±14) years. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 0-2 at enrolment. The 5-year EFS was 71%, transformation (AP/BC) free survival (TFS) was 95%, and overall survival was 87%. Of the 14 patients who died, 3 died in blast crisis, 2 from transplant-related complications, 8 from CML-unrelated causes, and the cause of death of 1 patient was unavailable. The annual rates of progression to AP/BC over 5 years were 3%, 1%, 0%, 1%, and 0%, while annual event rates were 13%, 8%, 8%, 1%, and 4%. CCR was achieved by 89% of patients by 60 months, while 72% achieved a major molecular response (MMR) by this time. In the first 12 months of treatment, 55% of patients maintained an imatinib dose of ≥600 mg/day (mean ±SD dose = 604 ±10 mg/day), while 45% were on <600 mg/day for at least part of this time (mean ±SD dose = 511 ±100 mg/day). EFS at 60 months was significantly higher in patients taking ≥600 mg/day compared with those who had been dose-reduced to <600 mg/day (89% vs 56%, P<0.001). Annual event rates for the ≥600 mg/day group were 6%, 2%, 2%, 0%, and 2%, while annual event rates for those on <600 mg/day were 14%, 16%, 16%, 8%, and 4%. By 60 months, 96% of patients who had been on ≥600 mg/day within the first 12 months had achieved CCR, while only 80% of those who had been on <600 mg/day had achieved this milestone (P<0.001). Log rank analysis of the achievement of MMR was also significant (P=0.03). Overall survival and TFS after 12 months were both similar between the dosing groups. There was no difference between the dosing groups' median age (50 vs 48 years, P=0.36) or Sokal score (1.04 vs 0.94, P=0.33) that may otherwise account for these results. The outcome was also determined for all patients dependent on the BCR-ABL levels at various assessment timepoints. Patients with a BCR-ABL level of <10% (IS) at 6 months (n=92) had an EFS of 78% at 60 months, while all of those with a level >10% (IS) (n=8) had an event (P<0.001). Patients with a level of ≤1% (IS) at 12 months (equivalent to CCR) (n=81) had an EFS of 75% compared with 25% (n=13) for those with levels >1% (IS) (P<0.001). At 18 months, a level ≤0.1% (IS) (n=58) conferred an EFS of 88%, while those who had failed to attain this depth of response (n=30) had an EFS of 60%. There was a significant difference in EFS between those who had achieved an MMR at 18 months and those who had achieved a CCR, but no MMR (88% vs 67%, P=0.03). In conclusion, our data suggest that patients maintaining a dose of ≥600mg in the first 12 months of imatinib therapy are more likely to achieve CCR and MMR, and superior EFS compared to those with a lower dose. This study also confirms that achieving an MMR by 18 months is associated with improved EFS. This emphasises the value of achieving a molecular response early in the treatment course, as well as adding weight to the evidence supporting the role of molecular monitoring in CML. Disclosures Branford: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. White:Novartis and Britol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Seymour:Bayer Schering: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel grants; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel Grants. Catalano:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel grants. Mills:Celgene Pty Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Early Switch to Nilotinib Does Not Overcome the Adverse Outcome for CML Patients Failing to Achieve Early Molecular Response On Imatinib, Despite Excellent Overall Outcomes in the TIDEL II Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3771.3771 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3771-3771 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

David T Yeung ◽

Michael Philip Osborn ◽

Deborah L White ◽

Susan Branford ◽

Michael Kornhauser ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Blast Crisis ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Time Dependent ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Trough Levels

Abstract Abstract 3771 Background: We have previously reported promising results from the TIDEL-II trial, using imatinib (IM) treatment upfront in patients (pts) newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome positive Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP), and switching selected pts to nilotinib (NIL) on the basis of failure to achieve time-dependent molecular response (MR). This strategy showed excellent rates of major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABL ≤0.1% IS) at 12 months (mos) and transformation free survival. Aim: To optimise molecular outcome and survival in treatment naïve CML-CP pts by selective dose escalation of IM for pts with low trough levels and early switching to NIL for pts with poor MR. Methods: TIDEL-II enrolled 210 CML-CP pts across 23 Australasian centres in 2 equal and sequential cohorts. All pts started treatment with IM 600mg/d and dose escalated to IM 800mg/d if IM trough levels were <1000ng/mL. A series of time-dependent MR targets were set: BCR-ABL ≤10%, ≤1% and ≤0.1% (IS) at 3, 6 and 12 mos. Cohort 1 (C1) pts failing to meet these targets dose escalated to IM 800 mg/d. Pts who failed to improve molecular response, or were already on IM 800mg/d, switched to NIL 400mg BID. Pts in cohort 2 (C2) who failed these targets switched to NIL directly. Pts with grade III/IV or persistent grade II toxicity were also allowed to switch from IM to NIL. Results: Median follow up (f/u) for C1 and C2 pts were 42 & 24 mos respectively, and 31 mos for all pts (15–56 mos) – see table 1. The primary end-point, confirmed MMR at 12 mos, was achieved by 64%, with no difference between C1 and C2. This climbed to 75% at 24 mos. At 12 & 24 mos, the proportion of pts with confirmed MR4.5 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.0032% IS) was 18% and 29% respectively. Six pts progressed to blast crisis (BC) : 4 in their 1st year of treatment, and 1 each in the 2nd and 3rd yrs, resulting in 2 deaths. Four other deaths were recorded, caused by stroke (1), pneumonia (1) and cardiac disease (2); 2 pts had NIL treatment before death. Eighteen mutations had been identified in 11 pts, including 4 pts with the highly resistant mutations T315I or E255K either singly or in combination with others. These were identified in the context of BC (3), loss of MMR (2), lack of MMR by 12 mos (4), and lack of CCR by 6 mos (2). One other pt lost MMR in the absence of a mutation and regained MMR with switching to NIL. Thirty-one pts in C1 switched to NIL: 19 for intolerance and 12 for failure to achieve targets after a trial of IM 800mg/d. Of the latter, with median f/u of 26 mos on NIL, 5/12 reached MMR subsequently. In C2, 44 patients switched to NIL, 12 for intolerance and 32 for failing targets: of the latter, 9 reached MMR with median f/u of 14 mos. In contrast, in the 31 (C1+C2) pts switching for IM-intolerance, all but 2 reached MMR (including 12 patients already in MMR at time of switch). Of the 25 pts with BCR-ABL ≥ 10% at 3mos, 3 pts progressed to BC (1 at 3.5mos), 6 more withdrew from study. Of the remainder, four pts achieved MMR, 9 more achieved BCR-ABL<1% but without MMR. None of these 25 pts have achieved MR4.5. (Table 2). Conclusion: Overall, the TIDEL-II strategy compares well with other upfront studies of CML-CP pts with regard to MR, as well as risk of death and progression to BC. A small proportion of pts experience further falls in BCR-ABL when switching from IM to NIL for failure to achieve deep MR. In the 12% of pts who fail to achieve BCR-ABL ≤10% at 3 mos, there is greater risk of BC and so far no deep MR are seen, despite intensification in kinase inhibition instituted at as early as 3 mos. Alternative approaches are needed both to identify these pts early and protect them from disease transformation. Disclosures: Yeung: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. White:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Branford:Novartis : Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad : Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cepheid : Consultancy. Slader:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Hiwase:CSL Ltd: Research Funding. Schwarer:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ross:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Grigg:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hughes:Novartis Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Treatment-Free Remission in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase According to Reasons for Switching from Imatinib to Nilotinib: Subgroup Analysis from ENESTop

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.792.792 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 792-792 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Timothy P. Hughes ◽

Carla Maria Boquimpani ◽

Naoto Takahashi ◽

Noam Benyamini ◽

Nelma Cristina D Clementino ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Loss Of Response ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Treatment Free Remission

Abstract Background: ENESTop, an ongoing, single-arm, phase 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01698905), is the first trial specifically evaluating treatment-free remission (TFR; ie, stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI] treatment without a loss of response) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) who achieved a sustained deep molecular response after switching from imatinib (IM) to nilotinib (NIL). Of 126 patients in ENESTop who were eligible to stop NIL, 57.9% (95% CI, 48.8%-66.7%) maintained TFR at 48 weeks. Here we present results from a subgroup analysis based on reasons for switching from IM to NIL, categorized as intolerance, resistance, and physician preference. Methods:Eligible patients were adults with CML-CP who received ≥ 3 years of total TKI therapy (> 4 weeks of IM, followed by ≥ 2 years of NIL) and achieved a sustained MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.0032% on the International Scale [BCR-ABL1IS]) on NIL therapy; patients with a documented MR4.5 at the time of switch from IM to NIL were not eligible. Enrolled patients continued NIL treatment in a 1-year consolidation phase, and those without confirmed loss of MR4.5 (ie, consecutive BCR-ABL1IS > 0.0032%) were eligible to stop NIL in the TFR phase. Patients with loss of major molecular response (MMR; ie, BCR-ABL1IS > 0.1%) or confirmed loss of MR4 (ie, consecutive BCR-ABL1IS > 0.01%) during the TFR phase reinitiated NIL treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained TFR (ie, no loss of MMR, confirmed loss of MR4, or treatment reinitiation) at 48 weeks after stopping NIL. In this post hoc analysis, rates of TFR at 48 weeks after stopping NIL and a Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis of treatment-free survival (TFS; defined as the time from the start of TFR to the earliest occurrence of any of the following: loss of MMR, confirmed loss of MR4, reinitiation of NIL due to any cause, progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis, death due to any cause) were evaluated in subgroups of patients who switched from IM to NIL due to intolerance, resistance, or physician preference. These categories were determined by grouping the reasons for switching from IM to NIL, as reported by the investigators, based on relatedness to safety (intolerance), loss of response/treatment failure (resistance), and the physician's clinical judgment (physician preference); individual reasons included within each category are presented in the Figure. Results:A total of 125 patients who entered the TFR phase were included in this analysis; 1 patient who was found to have had atypical transcripts was excluded. Among these 125 patients, the reasons for switching to NIL were categorized as intolerance in 51 patients (40.8%), resistance in 30 patients (24.0%), and physician preference in 44 patients (35.2%). The proportion of patients who maintained TFR at 48 weeks after stopping NIL was generally similar across the 3 subgroups: 30 of 51 (58.8%; 95% CI, 44.2%-72.4%) in the intolerance subgroup, 16 of 30 (53.3%; 95% CI, 34.3%-71.7%) in the resistance subgroup, and 27 of 44 (61.4%; 95% CI, 45.5%-75.6%) in the physician preference subgroup. KM analysis of TFS showed that in all 3 subgroups, the majority of TFS events occurred within the first 24 weeks after stopping NIL (Figure). There were no notable differences in the kinetics of TFS events among subgroups. The KM-estimated median duration of TFS was not reached by the data cutoff date in all 3 subgroups. Conclusion: Primary analysis from ENESTop showed that among patients with CML-CP who achieved a sustained MR4.5after switching from IM to NIL, 57.9% of those who stopped NIL maintained TFR at 48 weeks. In the present analysis, TFR was maintained at 48 weeks after stopping NIL by > 50% of patients in the intolerance, resistance, and physician preference subgroups, with generally similar results across subgroups. These findings suggest that the rate of successful TFR following second-line NIL does not differ based on the reasons for switching from IM to NIL. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Hughes: Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG): Other: Chair of the CML/MPN Disease Group. Boquimpani:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Takahashi:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Shuvaev:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis pharma: Honoraria. Ailawadhi:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Lipton:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Turkina:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Moiraghi:BMS: Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Speakers Bureau. Nicolini:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sacha:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Adamed: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kim:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fellague-Chebra:Novartis: Employment. Acharya:Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.: Employment. Krunic:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jin:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mahon:BMS: Honoraria; PFIZER: Honoraria; NOVARTIS PHARMA: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Second Treatment Free Remission after Combination Therapy with Ruxolitinib Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147954 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2555-2555

Author(s):

Kendra Sweet ◽

Ehab L. Atallah ◽

Jerry P. Radich ◽

Mei-Jie Zhang ◽

Eva Sahakian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment Free Remission ◽

One Year

Abstract Background: Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is feasible in a subset of CML patients who have maintained a deep molecular response for at least two years. Numerous discontinuation trials have been performed and consistently show approximately 50% of patients relapse after stopping TKIs. A recent study examining rates of treatment free remission (TFR) after a second attempt at stopping TKIs found, with a median follow up time of 38.3 months, 64.3% of patients had a molecular relapse (defined as a loss of major molecular response (MMR)). At 12, 24 and 36 months, TFR rates were 48%, 42% and 35%, respectively. These data suggest some patients with a history of molecular relapse upon TKI cessation could successfully stop treatment on a subsequent attempt, yet the majority will relapse a second time. 'Complete eradication' of CML remains elusive in most patients likely as a result of minimal residual disease (MRD), which is the result of BCR-ABL independent drug resistance. More specifically, CML cells that reside in sanctuary sites such as the bone marrow adhere to fibronectin and demonstrate cell adhesion mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR). The bone marrow microenvironment contains many cytokines and growth factors capable of inducing STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation via the JAK-STAT pathway leading to protection against TKI-induced cell death. Inhibiting JAK2 and TYK2 leads to complete inhibition of pSTAT3-Y705, thereby implicating the role of activation of JAK2 and TYK2 in STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation and resistance towards BCR-ABL TKI-induced cell death. A phase I clinical trial combined ruxolitinib, which inhibits JAK2 and TYK2, plus nilotinib in chronic phase (CP) CML patients and found that ruxolitinib 15mg PO BID was safe and well tolerated with 4/10 patients achieving undetectable BCR-ABL1 transcripts by PCR. Study Design and Methods: This single arm phase II study (NCT03610971) will enroll 41 subjects from the H Jean Khoury Cure CML Consortium. Eligible subjects must have a confirmed diagnosis of CP-CML and have previously attempted to discontinue TKI therapy per NCCN guidelines and had molecular recurrence, defined as loss of MMR, and were restarted on TKI. This trial combines ruxolitinib 15mg BID plus BCR-ABL TKI (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib or bosutinib) for 12 28-day cycles in the combination treatment phase (CTP). RQ-PCR to measure BCR-ABL transcripts will be checked at screening and every three months during the CTP. In the event that a subject experiences intolerance to a TKI, has confirmed loss of MMR, or loss of MR4.5 (>0.0032% IS) on two central PCR results, or discontinues ruxolitinib, the subject will be removed from CTP and enter into long term follow-up (LTFU). CTP phase will be followed by further RQ-PCR screening for the concurrent TFR phase. At this time ruxolitinib will be discontinued and any subject who has met the criteria for the TFR phase will be enrolled. During the TFR phase, subjects will discontinue their TKI and be monitored off treatment with RQ-PCR checked monthly for the first year, every six weeks for year two, and every 12 weeks during year three. Upon molecular recurrence, defined as loss of MMR, TKIs will be restarted. The primary endpoint is the 12-month TFR rate subsequent to completion of 12 cycles of combination therapy; however, subjects will remain in the TFR phase for three years. Therefore, the total duration of the trial will be approximately five years (one year on CTP + three years in the TFR phase + one-year LTFU). Study statistical design was calculated to yield a one-sided type I error rate of 0.025 and power of 65% when the true one-year relapse rate is 35%. This study will additionally assess patient-reported outcomes in conjunction with RQ-PCR testing. PROMIS and other measures will be self-administered through REDCap. Correlative studies will include comparing changes in pSTAT3 in K562 and KU812 cell lines using plasma from CML patients being treated with TKIs plus ruxolitinib, using the plasma inhibitory assay technique. Changes in pSTAT3 and pSTAT5 will be correlated with clinical response and rate of TFR. Additional correlatives include multiparameter flow-based assessment of the T-cell compartment (activity/polarization) as well as natural killer cell fractions in CML patients at various time points (TKIs alone, TKIs plus ruxolitinib and during TFR). Thus far, 14 patients have been enrolled. Disclosures Sweet: Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Atallah: Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Radich: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thompson: Novartis/ Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Mauro: Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharma / SPARC: Research Funding. Pinilla Ibarz: AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, TG Therapeutics, Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Advisory; Sellas: Other: ), patents/royalties/other intellectual property; MEI, Sunesis: Research Funding; AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Takeda: Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Ruxolitinib is being used off-label in chronic myeloid leukemia

Download Full-text

The TKI-Free Duration after a First Discontinuation Attempt That Failed in CP CML Patients Is a Predictive Factor of TKI-Free Remission after a Second Attempt

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123719 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 28-28 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Laurence Legros ◽

Franck E Nicolini ◽

Gabriel Etienne ◽

Philippe Rousselot ◽

Delphine Rea ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Blast Crisis ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Tki Discontinuation

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are able to induce, in some chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in chronic phase (CP), long-term molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) and several studies have now demonstrated that TKIs could be safely discontinued in those patients with a Treatment-Free Remission (TFR) rate reaching ~50%. The French CML group had recently demonstrated that a failure of the first TKI discontinuation attempt does not preclude a 2nd successful attempt (RE-STIM study, Legros et al. Cancer 2017). Methods: The RE-STIM study is a national observational multicentre study collecting all cases of 2nd TKI discontinuation attempt of regardless the type, the duration of TKI, the duration of MR4.5 and the reason of discontinuation. CP-CML Patients in failure of a 1st attempt, had to recover a 2nd sustained MR4.5 on TKI to be eligible for this new analysis of the enlarged database (n=106). Loss of MMR loss was the trigger for therapy re-introduction. Results: At the time of analysis (1st June 2019), 106 patients (median age: 55 years (range: 25-81 years)) were included with 41 months (2-131) of follow-up after 2nd discontinuation. Fifty males and 56 females were enrolled. The Sokal risk score was low in 45%, intermediate in 26.5%, high in 20% and unknown in 8.5% of patients. The majority of patients (95%) were treated with imatinib as first-line, and the others with a 2nd generation TKI. The median total time on TKI prior to a 2nd discontinuation was 104 months (range: 38-235) and the median duration of a 2nd MR4.5 prior to a 2nd discontinuation was 68 months (range: 20-176). After a 1st discontinuation attempt, the reason for TKI re-challenge was in majority a loss of MMR (66%), a loss of MR4.5 in 33% of patients (missing data in 1%). The TFR rates after a 2nd discontinuation attempt were 44.3% [95% CI 35.48-55.41] at 24 months, 38.5% [95% CI 29.65- 50.09] at 36 months and 33.2% [95% CI 24.31- 45.39] at 48 months. In univariate analysis, we failed to find any association between TFR and: age, gender, Sokal score, prior exposure to IFN, TKI in combination versus monotherapy, TKI type, TKI treatment duration and uMR4.5 duration before the 1st and 2nd discontinuation attempts, and type of molecular relapse after the 1st discontinuation attempt (MR4.5 versus MMR loss). However, the speed of molecular relapse after the 1st TKI discontinuation remains a factor significantly associated with outcome. In patients who remained in uMR4.5 at 3 months after the 1st discontinuation, the TFR rate at 48 months was 53% [95% CI: 35.32-79.31] and 26% [95% CI: 16.88-40.28] for others. Another factor significantly associated with outcome is the TKI-free duration after the 1st attempt (Figure). The TFR rate at 48 months was 45 % [95% CI: 28.64- 69.62] in patients who remained without treatment more than 6 months after their 1st attempt and 27% [95% CI: 17.57- 41.34] for others. All patients are alive at last follow-up except 2 who died from CML-unrelated reasons. One patient developed a sudden blast crisis at 4 years from 2nd discontinuation. The last previous molecular biology 3 months before transformation was MR4. In patients in TKI re-challenge (n=63), median TKI-free duration was 6 months (2-64), 55% of patients regained their MMR within 3 months (0-35) and 41% regained MR4.5 within 5 months (2-53). Conclusions: This larger cohort confirms that TKIs could safely and successfully be discontinued a 2nd time in CP CML patients despite a 1st failure. The speed of molecular relapse after the 1st TKI discontinuation and TKI-free duration remain major factors significantly associated with TFR outcome. Figure: TFR according TKI-free duration after the 1st attempt of discontinuation Figure Disclosures Legros: Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Nicolini:Sun Pharma Ltd: Consultancy; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Etienne:BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rousselot:Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Rea:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria. Guerci:INCYTE: Consultancy, Honoraria. Huguet:Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Coiteux:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mahon:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Imatinib Dose Interruption in Responding CML Patients Is Associated with Characteristic BCR-ABL Kinetics, Which Could Help to Differentiate Non-Adherence From Drug Resistance

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.113.113 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 113-113 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Susan Branford ◽

David T. Yeung ◽

Jodi Prime ◽

David Ross ◽

Timothy P. Hughes

Keyword(s):

Drug Resistance ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Blast Crisis ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Leukemic Cells ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Measurement Interval ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Loss Of Response

Abstract Abstract 113 Introduction. Adherence to therapy is known to be a critical factor for achieving an optimal imatinib (IM) response, and non-adherence is likely to be a cause of loss of response. In the absence of a biological marker of resistance, such as BCR-ABL mutations or blast crisis (BC), it is difficult to determine whether loss of response is associated with non-adherence or drug resistance. Prior studies found that the rate of a BCR-ABL rise provided biological insight into the disease phase at relapse (Blood 1996 87 4473; Blood 2004 104 2926). A more rapid rate of rise occurred in patients (pts) who relapsed into advanced phases compared to those who relapsed into chronic phase (CP), as assessed by the number of days over which BCR-ABL doubled (doubling-time, DT). We compared the DTs of pts with progression to BC and those who acquired a BCR-ABL mutation and maintained CP to the DTs of responding pts with documented IM discontinuation/interruption. The aim was to determine whether IM interruption was associated with characteristic BCR-ABL kinetics and loss of response, and whether the DT could help to differentiate drug resistance from non-adherence. Method. The molecular data was examined for 179 CP pts who achieved a major cytogenetic response and met these inclusion criteria: relapsed directly into BC at the time of a significant BCR-ABL rise; or a mutation was detected and CP was maintained at the time of a rise; or discontinued IM while in a sustained complete molecular response (CMR) as part of a discontinuation study; and/or IM dose was documented for BCR-ABL measurement intervals. IM dose interruption was defined as zero IM for ≥10% of days of a BCR-ABL measurement interval. Results. Twelve pts relapsed directly into BC and their BCR-ABL DT was short (median 9.0 days (d), range (r) 6.1–17.6); 8 had mutations and there was no DT difference for these pts. In contrast, 28 pts who maintained CP after mutation detection had a longer DT: median 45 d (r 17–140), P<.0001 (Figure). These pts met one or more criteria for IM failure (only 1 subsequently progressed to BC on IM after 8 months). While in CMR, 36 pts discontinued IM and 17 had a significant BCR-ABL rise and molecular relapse. The DT (median 9.0 d, r 6.9–27) was similar to the BC pts, P=.52. The short DT of pts who discontinued IM is consistent with the rate at which terminally differentiated leukemic cells arise from leukemic progenitors in the absence of IM (Nature 2005 435 1267, 8 d DT). The similarly short DT of BC pts suggests complete lack of BCR-ABL inhibition by IM, whereas relapse into CP with mutations was characterized by slow BCR-ABL kinetics, presumably due to maintenance of partial BCR-ABL inhibition by IM. We determined whether temporary IM dose interruption in responding pts also resulted in a BCR-ABL rise and characteristic DTs. IM interruption occurred in 42 pts (46 interruptions) for: intolerance 32; non-adherence 8; second malignancy/surgery 3; other 3. The IM interruptions were divided into 2 groups according to the days of zero IM: 100% of BCR-ABL measurement interval days (complete lack of BCR-ABL inhibition); or 10 to <100% of days (partial BCR-ABL inhibition). Twelve pts had 100% IM interruption and all had a rapid BCR-ABL rise and short DTs (median 9.4 d, r 4.2–17.6), consistent with the kinetic pattern of BC and discontinued in CMR pts, P=.78. Loss of response occurred in 11/12. Thirty pts had 34 measurement intervals of zero IM for 10 to <100% of days (median 33%, r 10–89). A BCR-ABL rise occurred in 27/34 interruptions and the DT (median 26 d, r 11.6–87) was significantly longer than BC, discontinued in CMR and 100% interruption pts, P<.0001. BCR-ABL remained stable in 5/34 interruptions and a reduction occurred in 2. Loss of response occurred in 18/34 interruptions. Of all 46 measurement intervals with an IM interruption (complete or partial), a significant BCR-ABL rise occurred in 39 (85%) and loss of response in 29 (63%), including 7/8 interruptions due to non-adherence. No pt progressed during the interruption. Twenty-one pts with a mutation and/or BC relapse had dose data available: none had an IM interruption during the relevant measurement interval. Conclusion. IM interruption is associated with a BCR-ABL rise. Intermittent IM dosing may be associated with a longer DT, similar to that seen with the emergence of mutations in CP. A short BCR-ABL DT is typical of complete loss of BCR-ABL inhibition and, for a patient still in CP, should raise the suspicion of non-adherence. Disclosures: Branford: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Yeung:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myer Squibb: Research Funding. Ross:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hughes:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Impact of Age on Efficacy and Toxicity of Nilotinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): ENEST1st Sub-Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.479.479 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 479-479

Author(s):

Francis J. Giles ◽

Delphine Rea ◽

Michele Baccarani ◽

Nicholas C.P. Cross ◽

Juan Luis Steegmann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Blast Crisis ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Risk Scores ◽

Drug Discontinuation ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Sokal Score

Abstract Background: The incidence of CML increases with age and also the disease characteristics vary with age. However, whether age has any impact on molecular response (MR) with TKIs or not has not been clearly established. Objective: To assess the effect of age on MR and adverse events (AEs) with nilotinib (NIL) in patients (pts) with CML in the ENEST1st (NCT01061177) phase 3b trial. Patients and Methods: ENEST1st is an open-label study of NIL 300 mg BID in adults with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Treated pts with typical transcripts and ≤ 3 months of prior imatinib (IM) therapy were included in the sub-analysis and were stratified according to age (> 65 years and ≤ 65 years). Primary endpoint was rate of MR4 (defined as BCR-ABL ≤ 0.01% on the International Scale [BCR-ABLIS ] or undetectable BCR-ABL in cDNA with ≥ 10,000 ABL transcripts) at 18 months. Results: Of the 1089 pts (median age, 53 years; range, 18 - 91 years) enrolled into the study, 1052 had b2a2 and/or b3a2 BCR-ABL transcripts and were treated with IM for ≤ 3 months. Sokal risk scores were low, intermediate, and high in 34.9%, 37.5%, and 18.1% of pts, respectively (9.5% missing). The rate of MR4 at 18 months in all treated pts with typical transcripts and ≤ 3 months of prior IM (n = 1052) was 38.4% (95% CI, 35.5% - 41.3%). The cumulative rates of MR at 24 months are shown in the figure. At 12 months the rates of MR4 and MR4.5 were 30.8% and 15.3% respectively. Among pts who were in MR4 and MR4.5 at 12 months, 60.8% and 33.9% pts were able to maintain continuous MR4 and MR4.5 until Month 24, with no documented loss of MR4 and MR4.5 between 12 and 24 months, respectively. Among all pts treated (n=1089), six pts (0.6%) progressed to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC) on study; 13 pts (1.2%) died by 24 months, including one due to CML progression (16 month after study drug discontinuation). The most common AEs of any cause were rash (21.4%), pruritus (16.5%), and headache (15.2%). Subgroup-analysis by age: As per the WHO guidelines, pts > 65 years are defined as older. Accordingly, for this sub-analysis, pts with typical transcripts and treated with IM for ≤ 3 months (n = 1052) were stratified into two subgroups: 851 pts (80.9%) were ≤ 65 years of age and 201 pts (19.1%) were > 65 years old at the time of enrollment. The median age at enrollment was 71 (range 66 - 91) and 48 (range 18 - 65) years in the old and young group, respectively. Among old pts, Sokal risk scores were low, intermediate, and high in 4.5%, 61.2%, and 23.4% of pts, respectively (10.9% missing). Among young pts, Sokal risk scores were low, intermediate, and high in 42.1%, 32.0%, and 16.9% of pts, respectively (9.0% missing). Cumulative incidence of MR4 by 18 months was 48.8% (95% CI, 45.4% - 52.1%) among younger pts and 48.3% (95% CI, 41.4% - 55.2%) in older pts. Rate of MR4 by 18 months among younger pts with low, intermediate, and high Sokal score was 53.6%, 45.2%, and 35.4%, respectively. Rate of MR4 by 18 months among older pts with low, intermediate, and high Sokal score was 44.4%, 49.6%, and 44.7%, respectively. The incidence rate of MR4.5 by 18 months in younger pts and older pts was 32.5% and 28.4%, respectively. Most common AEs experienced by younger patients were rash (23%), headache (17%), pruritus (16%), and fatigue (14%). In older population, the list of most common AEs includes pruritus (19%), nausea (18%), and rash (14%) (Table). Conclusions: In this study, frontline NIL yielded equivalent rates of molecular responses in older and younger pts with a similar safety profile. Table. Adverse Event Patients ≤65 years (n = 851)% Patients >65 years (n = 201)% Rash 23.2 13.8 Headache 17.1 7.6 Pruritus 16.0 18.6 Fatigue 14.0 13.3 Thrombocytopenia 11.0 7.6 Nasopharyngitis 10.8 8.6 Alopecia 10.8 9.5 Nausea 9.8 17.6 Diarrhea 8.0 11.4 Asthenia 8.4 11.0 Anemia 5.1 10.5 Abdominal pain 6.9 10.5 Dry skin 8.2 10.0 Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Giles: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Rea:Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria. Baccarani:NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Cross:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Qiagen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Steegmann:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Griskevicius:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Coriu:PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ossenkoppele:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mahon:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Müller:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hellmann:BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Porkka:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Brümmendorf:Novartis: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Gastl:AOP Orphan: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Tubazio:Novartis: Employment. Pellegrino:Novartis: Employment. Dezzani:Novartis: Employment. Rosti:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hochhaus:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Treatment Free Remission in Patients with Chronic Phase CML: A Single Center Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152787 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3612-3612

Author(s):

Quinto J Gesiotto ◽

Akriti G Jain ◽

Somedeb Ball ◽

Lisa Nodzon ◽

Amanda Rodriguez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Published Data ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment Free Remission ◽

Tki Discontinuation

Abstract Introduction: Treatment-free remission (TFR) is an emerging treatment goal in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). The NCCN guidelines suggest patients must meet the following criteria in order to be eligible for an attempt at TKI discontinuation: use of a TKI for at least 3 years with no history of TKI resistance who have maintained a deep molecular response (MR4 - BCR-ABL IS ≤0.01%) for at least 2 years. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of long-term TFR in CP-CML patients who discontinue TKI therapy at our institution. Methods: We retrospectively identified all CP-CML patients who had discontinued TKIs after meeting TKI discontinuation criteria at Moffitt Cancer Center. Patient charts were reviewed to collect data on demographics, disease characteristics, and outcomes. TFR was calculated from date of TKI discontinuation to date of molecular recurrence (defined as loss of MMR (BCR-ABL IS ≥0.1%) or date of last follow up). Statistical analysis was performed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Results: A total of 102 patients met TKI discontinuation criteria and stopped treatment to attempt TFR. The median age at diagnosis was 53.5 years (19-83 years). The median age at TKI discontinuation was 61 years (28-92 years). Fifty (49.5%) patients were male. Four patients (3.9%) had previously received interferon α. At a median follow up of 29 months, the TFR rate was 56.8%, with molecular recurrence occurring in 44 patients. 93 patients had a follow up of at least 6 months. Of the 44 patients with molecular recurrence, 37 (84%) recurred within 6 months and 41 (93%) within 12 months of TKI cessation. The rate of TFR at 12 months and 24 months was 58% (95% CI: 48-68%) and 53% (95% CI: 43-64%), respectively [Figure 1]. Baseline characteristics along with univariate analysis of the 102 patients included in the study are shown in Table 1. Age, BMI at discontinuation, gender, Sokol risk index, last TKI prior to discontinuation, lines of therapy, or duration on TKI prior to discontinuation did not significantly affect rates of TFR. Patients with sustained MR4.5 (BCR-ABL IS <0.0032%) for 2 years prior to discontinuation showed a trend toward higher probability of TFR at 12 months compared to those in MR4 (62% vs 49%; p=0.055). Median time to regain MMR after restarting treatment in patients with molecular recurrence was 90 days (range 28-443 days). 32 patients (31%) developed TKI withdrawal syndrome with symptoms including headache, arthralgia, myalgia and fatigue. Conclusions: At our center, 102 CP-CML patients qualified for TKI cessation. The rate of TFR at 12 months was 58% which is consistent with published data from numerous TKI discontinuation clinical trials. We were unable to identify any factors that were predictive of successful TFR, however those patients with a deeper molecular response (MR 4.5) at the time of TKI cessation trended towards higher rates of TFR at 12 months, suggesting that the depth of response is important for achieving prolonged TFR. Identifying methods to further deepen molecular response in CP-CML patients may ultimately lead to higher rates of TFR in the future. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nodzon: Takeda: Consultancy. Komrokji: Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Taiho Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy; PharmaEssentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMSCelgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Geron: Consultancy. Sallman: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta: Consultancy; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Intellia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Padron: Blueprint: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Stemline: Honoraria; Taiho: Honoraria; Kura: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Kuykendall: BluePrint Medicines: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CTI Biopharma: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Protagonist: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prelude: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; PharmaEssentia: Honoraria. Lancet: Jazz: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Millenium Pharma/Takeda: Consultancy; ElevateBio Management: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy; BerGenBio: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. Pinilla Ibarz: Sellas: Other: ), patents/royalties/other intellectual property; AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Takeda: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, TG Therapeutics, Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Advisory; MEI, Sunesis: Research Funding. Sweet: Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Response and Outcomes to Nilotinib at 24 Months in Imatinib-Resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and Accelerated Phase (CML-AP) with and without BCR-ABL Mutations.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1130.1130 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1130-1130 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jerald P. Radich ◽

Giovanni Martinelli ◽

Andreas Hochhaus ◽

Enrico Gottardi ◽

Simona Soverini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Imatinib Resistant

Abstract Abstract 1130 Poster Board I-152 Background Nilotinib is a selective and potent BCR-ABL inhibitor, with in vitro activity against most BCR-ABL mutants (excluding T315I) indicated for the treatment of patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) CML in CPor AP resistant or -intolerant to prior therapy, including imatinib. In a previous analysis of nilotinib in patients with BCR-ABL mutations, mutations occurring at three specific amino acid residues (E255K/V, Y253H, and F359C/V) were shown to be associated with less favorable response to nilotinib. The current analysis is based on mature data with a minimum follow-up of 24-months for all patients. Outcomes of patients at 24 months were analyzed by mutation type. Methods Imatinib-resistant CML-CP (n = 200) and CML-AP (n = 93) patients were subdivided into the following mutational subsets: no mutation, sensitive mutations (including mutations with unknown in vitro IC50). or E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations at baseline. Patients with mutations of unknown in vitro sensitivity were classified as sensitive in this analysis based on a previous finding that patients with these mutations responded similarly to nilotinib as patients with sensitive mutation. Patients with baseline T315I mutations were excluded from this analysis. Patient groups were analyzed for kinetics and durability of cytogenetic and molecular response to nilotinib, as well as event-free survival (EFS), defined as loss of hematologic or cytogenetic response, progression to AP/BC, discontinuation due to disease progression, or death, and overall survival (OS). Results In CML-CP and -AP patients with no mutation, sensitive mutations, or E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations, hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses are provided in the Table. Overall, patients with no mutations responded similarly to patients with sensitive mutations, whereas patients with E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations had less favorable responses. This correlation was observed in both CML-CP and CML-AP patients, respectively. Median time to CCyR was 3.3 months (range, 1.0–26.7) for CML-CP patients with no mutations, and 5.6 months (range, 0.9–22.1) for patients with sensitive mutations. At 24 months, CCyR was maintained in 74% of CML-CP patients with no mutation and in 84% of patients with sensitive mutations. One patient with CML-CP and an E255K mutation achieved CCyR at 25 months and maintained until last assessment at 30 months. Median time to MMR was similar at 5.6 months (range, 0.9–25.8) for CML-CP patients with no mutations and 5.6 months (range, 2.7–22.1) for patients with sensitive mutations. No patient with a less sensitive mutation achieved MMR. Median EFS and 24-month estimated OS rate are provided in the Table. Conclusions Imatinib-resistant CML-CP and CML-AP patients treated with nilotinib therapy with BCR-ABL mutations (excluding E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V) achieved rapid and durable cytogenetic responses, and estimated EFS and OS at 24 months similar to that of patients with no mutations, respectively. Patients with E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations had lower and less-durable responses and shorter EFS than patients with sensitive mutations. Alternative therapies may be considered for patients with these uncommon mutations (E255K/V, Y253H, and F359C/V). Disclosures Radich: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Research Funding. Branford:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shou:Novartis: Employment. Haque:Novartis: Employment. Woodman:Novartis: Employment. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kim:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Impact of Additional Cytogenetic Alterations At Diagnosis on Prognosis of CML: Long-Term Observation From 1151 Patients of the Randomized CML Study IV

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.782.782 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 782-782

Author(s):

Alice Fabarius ◽

Armin Leitner ◽

Andreas Hochhaus ◽

Martin C Müller ◽

Claudia Haferlach ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Y Chromosome ◽

Research Funding ◽

Blast Crisis ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Major Route ◽

The Impact

Abstract Abstract 782 Introduction: Current evidence indicates that acquired genetic instability in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) as a consequence of the t(9;22)(q34;q11) and the resulting BCR-ABL fusion causes the continuous acquisition of additional chromosomal aberrations (ACA) and mutations and thereby progression to accelerated phase and blast crisis (BC). Around 10 –12% of patients in chronic phase (CP) CML have ACA already at diagnosis. During the course of the disease this number rises to 80% in BC. Acquisition of ACA during treatment is considered as a poor prognostic indicator, whereas the impact of ACA at diagnosis is controversial. Patients and methods: Clinical and cytogenetic data of 1151 out of 1311 patients with Philadelphia and BCR-ABL positive CP CML randomized until 2009 to the German CML-Study IV were investigated in a prospective study. There were 459 females (40%) and 692 males (60%). Median age was 53 years (range, 16–88). All patients were treated with imatinib alone or in combination with interferon alpha or araC. The impact of ACA at diagnosis on time to complete cytogenetic and major molecular remission (CCR, MMR) and progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS) was investigated. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to entering the study. Results: At diagnosis 1003/1151 patients (87%) had the standard t(9;22)(q34;q11) only and 69 patients (6.0%) had a variant t(v;22). In 60 of 69 patients with t(v;22), only one further chromosome was involved in the translocation, in 7 patients two, and in 2 patients three further chromosomes were involved. Seventy-nine patients (6.9%) had ACA. Of these, 38 patients (3.3%) lacked the Y chromosome (-Y) and 41 patients (3.6%) had ACA except -Y. Sixteen of the 41 patients had major-route ACA (+8, i(17)(q10), +der(22)t(9;22)(q34;q11), ider(22)(q10)t(9;22)(q34;q11)) and 25 minor-route ACA [e.g. t(3;12), t(4;6), t(2;16), t(1;21)]. In patients with major-route ACA, trisomy 8 was the most frequent additional alteration (n=9). +der(22)t(9;22)(q34;q11) was observed in six patients, isochromosome (17)(q10) in five patients and ider(22)(q10)t(9;22)(q34;11) in three patients. After a median observation time of 5.3 years for patients with t(9;22), t(v;22), -Y, minor- and major-route ACA median times to CCR were 1.01, 0.95, 0.98, 1.49 and 1.51 years, to MMR 1.40, 1.58, 1.65, 2.49 and > 7 years, 5-year PFS 90%, 81%, 88%, 96% and 50% and 5-year OS 92%, 87%, 91%, 96% and 53%, respectively. In patients with major-route ACA times to CCR and MMR were longer. PFS and OS were shorter (p<0.001) than with standard t(9;22)(q34;q11). Loss of Y chromosome had no influence on time to CCR or MMR, PFS and OS. Conclusion: We conclude that the prognostic impact of additional cytogenetic findings at diagnosis of CML is heterogeneous and consideration of their types may be important. Major-route ACA identify a small group of patients with significantly poorer prognosis as compared to all other patients requiring early and more intensive intervention such as stem cell transplantation. Disclosures: Hochhaus: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Haferlach:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kneba:Hoffmann La Roche: Honoraria.

Download Full-text