Clinical Significance of Clonal Hematopoiesis in the Setting of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma

Abstract Introduction : Peripheral blood samples of healthy individuals may harbour detectable mutations in genes recurrently mutated in myeloid malignancies, a situation referred to as clonal hematopoiesis (CH). Risk factors for CH include increasing age as well as previous exposure to cytotoxic therapy. CH has been associated with an increased risk of overall mortality, including in the setting of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Gibson et al, JCO, 2017). The excess mortality is largely driven by cardio-vascular disease, but may also be additionally attributable to an increased risk of myeloid malignancies that arise through the selection of CH subclones. Herein, we aimed to investigate the prognostic implications of CH after ASCT in an independent and diversified, large cohort of lymphoma patients using ultra-deep, highly sensitive error-correction sequencing. Methods : DNA was obtained from 420 residual apheresis products obtained from patients who had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation for lymphoma at the Princess Margaret Cancer Center between 2002 and 2018. Target DNA sequences corresponding to regions recurrently mutated in myeloid neoplasms (affecting n = 36 genes) were captured using single molecule molecular inversion probes (smMIPs) that incorporate molecular tagging. Single nucleotide variants and short insertions and deletions were identified using SmMIP-tools (Medeiros et al, bioRxiv, 2021), which implements a series of steps including probabilistic modeling of allele-specific error rates and generation of consensus sequences to suppress next-generation sequencing-associated errors. Given the high sensitivity and precision of our method, we did not prespecify a variant allele fraction cut-off. Results : All patients had relapsed/refractory lymphoma, except for 98 (23.3%) mantle cell lymphoma patients and one patient with extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma where ASCT was part of frontline management. The most common conditioning regimens were high-dose melphalan and etoposide (77.5%) and high-dose melphalan and Ara-C (16.4%). We identified 275 high-confidence mutations in 181 out of 420 patients (43.1%), with 64 of these 181 patient samples (35.4%) having more than one mutation. The median age was higher in patients with CH than in patients without (55 years vs. 51, P = 0.002). The most frequently mutated gene were PPM1D (11.9%), followed by TET2 (11.4%), DNMT3A (8.8%), ASXL1 (5.2%) and TP53 (4.5%). The lymphoma subtype with the highest prevalence of CH was T-cell lymphoma (CH found in 72.2% of cases), followed by transformed indolent lymphoma (51.4%), mantle cell lymphoma (47.5%), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (40.4%) and Hodgkin lymphoma (33.3%). While there was no difference in the number of CD34+ cells infused for patients with and without CH, the median time to neutrophil engraftment and the median time to platelet engraftment were significantly longer in patients with CH (11 days vs. 10 days, P = 0.025; and 14 days vs. 13 days, P < 0.001, respectively). The median follow-up of living patients was 4.2 years. Patients with CH had inferior 5-year OS from the time of first relapse (38.9% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.037) and from the time of ASCT (51.2% vs. 59.1%, P = 0.017, see figure). Five-year OS from ASCT was 47.5% vs. 53.7% in patients with 1 mutation and > 1 mutation, respectively, compared to 59.1% in patients without CH (P = 0.005). The presence of CH did not have an impact on the risk of post-ASCT relapse. In multivariate Cox regression analysis in which CH and age (as a continuous variable) were included, CH remained significantly associated with adverse OS post-ASCT (HR 1.39, 95% 1.02-1.91, P = 0.038). Only seven patients out of 420 (1.7%) developed a therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (TMN). The cumulative incidence of TMN was not significantly increased in patients with CH (10-year cumulative incidence 3.3% vs. 3.0% in those without CH, P = 0.433). Conclusions : Our results show that CH was associated with delayed neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Moreover, CH conferred an increased risk of death after ASCT that was not explained by lymphoma relapse. The risk of TMN was low in our cohort and CH was not a risk factor for TMN, an observation that is distinct from prior observations (e.g. Gibson et al, JCO, 2017 and Husby et al, Leukemia, 2020). Our results raise the possibility that the risk of TMN may be modulated by factors other than CH. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Minden: Astellas: Consultancy. Kuruvilla: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Antengene: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Pfizer: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Medison Ventures: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Crump: Roche: Research Funding; Epizyme: Research Funding; Kyte/Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Prica: Kite Gilead: Honoraria; Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria. Chen: Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astrazeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy. Kridel: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Trial of Venetoclax in Combination with BEAM Conditioning Chemotherapy (V-BEAM) with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124602 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5705-5705

Author(s):

Allison M. Winter ◽

Kirsten M Boughan ◽

Jack Khouri ◽

Paolo Caimi ◽

Faiz Anwer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Level 2

Background: High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard treatment both as consolidation after induction chemotherapy and as second-line therapy depending on the histologic subtype of NHL. BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) is a commonly used conditioning regimen for NHL but often fails to produce durable remission, likely due to inherent chemoresistance. Many B-cell NHL subtypes including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and double-hit lymphoma are resistant to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis by overexpression of Bcl-2. Venetoclax is an orally administered selective Bcl-2 inhibitor with significant single agent activity in CLL and mantle cell lymphoma. In addition, the efficacy of venetoclax is potentiated by combination with rituximab [Seymour 2018, Kater 2018] and multiple lines of preclinical data show synergistic efficacy with a range of both novel and conventional antineoplastic agents [Johnson-Farley 2015, Li 2015]. Study Design and Methods: This is a single arm, open-label, dose-escalation phase I trial to evaluate the safety of venetoclax in combination with BEAM (V-BEAM) conditioning chemotherapy. Key inclusion criteria include patients with pathologically confirmed NHL, regardless of specific histology, who have received one prior systemic therapy and are eligible for and proceeding with HDCT followed by ASCT. The trial employs a standard 3+3 cohort-based dose escalation design of venetoclax (800 mg daily days -7 through -6 on dose level 1, 800 mg daily days -7 through -5 on dose level 2, 800 mg daily days -7 through -4 on dose level 3, 800 mg daily days -7 through -3 on dose level 4, and 800 mg daily days -7 through -2 on dose level 5) with standard doses of BEAM followed by ASCT. The primary objectives are to assess safety, describe dose-limiting toxicities, engraftment of stem cells and to identify the recommended phase II dose. Secondary objectives include evaluation of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to historical controls treated with BEAM as part of ASCT. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment will be estimated with cumulative incidence and compared to controls with Gray test. OS and PFS will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier and compared to controls with the log-rank test. As of 8/1/2019, the first dosing cohort of 3 patients have been enrolled and successfully completed study treatment. There are 3 patients in screening to be enrolled in dose level 2. Additional accrual will be presented at the time of the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03713580. Disclosures Anwer: Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; In-Cyte: Speakers Bureau. Gerds:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Imago Biosciences: Research Funding. Majhail:Nkarta: Consultancy; Atara Bio: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Anthem, Inc.: Consultancy. Hill:TG therapeutics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celegene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Our trial in progress is investigating the use of venetoclax in combination with BEAM conditioning chemotherapy prior to autologous stem cell transplantation. Venetoclax is not currently approved in this setting.

Download Full-text

Impact of Daratumumab-Containing Induction on Stem Cell Mobilization and Collection, Engraftment and Hospitalization Parameters Among Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149499 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3886-3886

Author(s):

Evangelos Eleutherakis Papaiakovou ◽

Evangelos Terpos ◽

Nikolaos Kanellias ◽

Magdalini Migkou ◽

Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treated Group ◽

High Dose ◽

On Demand ◽

Increased Risk

Abstract Introduction: Advances in induction regimens have significantly improved depth of response and duration of remission in multiple myeloma (MM) patients who are eligible for high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Proteasome inhibitor-based induction regimens are standard as part of induction and it has been shown not to have any detrimental effect on stem cell (SC) collection and engraftment. Daratumumab (DARA) is an IgG1k monoclonal antibody directed against CD38 with potent antimyeloma activity. Based on the results of prospective studies DARA is now approved as part of induction therapy. Available data indicate a potential impact of DARA on SC collection but there is limited data on engraftment, duration of hospitalization and infection risk. In this retrospective analysis we evaluated the effect of DARA-based induction on ASCT parameters. Methods: The analysis included consecutive newly diagnosed MM patients that received ASCT between 2016 and 2020, as part of their upfront treatment regimen in our institution (Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Athens, Greece). Per institutional protocol, after 4-6 cycles of induction, pts received low dose cyclophosphamide (2.5 g/m2) followed by G-CSF (10 mcg/Kg/day) to mobilize and collect SCs. Plerixafor was administered on-demand in case of poor mobilization and insufficient first day collection. Large volume leukapheresis was performed in pts with low CD34+ counts in order to increase CD34+ yield. Pts received G-CSF 480 μcg once daily from day +4 after SC reinfusion to ANC >1500/mm3. All pts received antiviral and antifungal but no anti-bacterial prophylaxis. Results: 200 eligible pts were included in the analysis; 40 (20%) pts received DARA as part of PI-based upfront treatment and 160 (80%) pts received PI-based upfront treatment without DARA. Baseline demographics (age, gender, performance status) and disease characteristics (ISS and R-ISS stage, cytopenias, eGFR, lytic bone disease etc) were not different between the two groups. Response after induction was also similar (CR+VGPR rate was 93% vs 95% for non-DARA and DARA-containing regimens respectively). Use of DARA at induction was associated with lower total mean number of collected CD 34+ SCs (10.48 x 10^6/kg vs 16.58 x 10^6/kg, p<0.0001), or SC collection on day 1 (7.99 x 10^6/kg vs 16.27 x 10^6/kg, p<0.0001). Fewer pts in the DARA-treated group achieved the planned yield of at least 5 X 10^6 CD34+/kg, compared to DARA-untreated group (87.5 % vs 96.2%, p=0.047). DARA-treated pts required more often additional SC mobilization with on demand administration of plerixafor (42.5% vs 7.6%, p<0.0001). In order to compensate for a poorer mobilization and lower quality graft (CD34% 0.66% vs 1.26% in apheresis product, p<0.0001) DARA-treated group underwent more often >1 day of SC collection (37.5% vs 6.3%, P <0.0001), resulting in longer duration of collections (689 vs 452 min, p<0.0001) and larger total apheresis volumes (723 vs 557 ml, p<0.0001). However, 97% and 98% of pts in the two groups respectively were able to move to at least a single ASCT. Following ASCT, DARA-treated pts had a slightly delayed hematopoietic recovery (11 vs 10 days to PMN>500/mm3, p<0.001 and 12 vs 11 days for PLT counts> 25x10^9/mm3, p<0.001) and required more transfusions (2 vs 1 for RBCs, p=0.031 and 4 vs 2 for platelets, p<0.001). Rates of neutropenic fever were higher (80% vs 67%, p=0.182), required antibiotics for longer duration (10 vs 8 days, p=0.042) and more often 2 or more lines of antibiotic therapy (53% vs 39%, p=0.003), experienced more often septic shock (12.5% vs 1.3%, p=0.003) and as a results DARA-treated pts had a slightly prolonged hospitalization (21 vs 19 days, p=0.02). However, D100 mortality was not statistically different (<2% in both groups). Conclusion: DARA-containing induction before ASCT is associated with poorer mobilization and frequent need for use of plerixafor. However, similar percentage of patients can move to at least a single ASCT. The use of DARA-containing induction was also associated with slightly increased risk of infectious complications, antibiotics use and blood product transfusions but no increase in the risk of D100 mortality. These data point to the need for certain modifications to ASCT protocol for patients treated with DARA-containing regimens at induction, such as preemptive use of plerixafor, and perhaps prophylactic antibiotics. Disclosures Terpos: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gavriatopoulou: Takeda: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Dimopoulos: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; BeiGene: Honoraria. Kastritis: Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Clinical, Metabolic and Molecular Responses After 4 Courses of R-DHAP and After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients Included in the LyMa Trial, a Lysa Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.152.152 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 152-152 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Steven Le Gouill ◽

Mary Callanan ◽

Elizabeth Macintyre ◽

marie-Hélène delfau-Larue ◽

Caroline bodet-Milin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Response Rates ◽

High Dose ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mantle Cell

Abstract Abstract 152 Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare B-cell malignancy characterized by the t(11;14) translocation. The European MCL network has demonstrated that a sequential R-CHOP/R-DHAP chemotherapy regimen prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) provides better disease control than R-CHOP (Hermine et al, ASH 2010, abstract 110) and that molecular minimal residual disease (MRD) measured by IGH real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) before and after ASCT is an important prognostic factor to predict progression-free survival (PFS) (Pott et al. Blood. 2010;115(16):3215–23). Indeed, the use of high-dose aracytine upfront before ASCT is now recommended and molecular remission appears to be a major objective for future clinical trials in MCL. It therefore appeared interesting to appreciate response rates combining standard evaluation (Cheson 1999), FDG-PET imaging (Cheson 2007) and PCR techniques after rituximab plus upfront high-dose aracytine (R-DHAP) followed by ASCT. Response rates after 4 courses of R-DHAP were one of the objectives of the LyMa trial (NCT00921414). This trial is a randomized, open-label, phase III study that evaluates the efficacy of rituximab maintenance therapy in MCL patients aged between 18 and 66 years old, undergoing first-line treatment with 4xR-DHAP and exhibiting a response after ASCT (R-BEAM). Patients who do not reach a sufficient partial remission after R-DHAP are planned to receive 4 additional courses of R-CHOP before ASCT. The LyMa trial started in September 2008 and was designed to enroll 299 patients over a 4 years period. To date (August 2012), 295 patients have been included. Herein, we report response rates according to the combination of Cheson 1999 and 2007 criteria plus molecular response rates after 4xR-DHAP and after ASCT for the first 200 enrolled patients (last inclusion in August 2011). Results: One patient withdrew consent and the analysis is therefore on 199 patients. The cohort's median age is 57.2 years (range 29.7–65.7) and 41 patients are female (20%). At diagnosis, simplified MIPI was low in 104 cases (52%), intermediate in 55 (28%) and high in 40 (20%).Twenty-five patients (12.5%) presented with a blastoid variant. The panel of pathologist experts confirmed the diagnosis in all reviewed cases. Among the 199 evaluable patients, 182 (91%) received 4 courses of R-DHAP and 12 patients (all in PR according to Cheson 99 criteria) received 4 additional courses of R-CHOP because of insufficient clinical response after R-DHAP. Among these 12 patients, 5 reached CR/CRu after R-CHOP. Ultimately, 164 patients (82%) proceeded to ASCT (158 after R-DHAP and 6 after RDHAP/R-CHOP) and 154 (77.4%) have been randomized between rituximab maintenance or no maintenance. In an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and according to Cheson 1999 criteria, 152 patients (76.3%) reached CR (n=74) or CRu (n=78) after 4 courses of R-DHAP while 25 patients reached PR and 8 presented with SD/Prog. According to Cheson 2007 criteria (n= 170; PET not done in 17 cases and data missing in 12 cases), 129 patients reached CR while 41 patients remained FDG-TEP positive. Response rates according to Cheson 1999 and 2007 criteria for transplanted patients (n=164) were CR (n=109)/CRu (n=45) in 94% and CR in 84.5% (129 patients underwent FDG-PET after ASCT), respectively. Regarding MRD, diagnosis samples were available for 186/199 patients. Forty-one diagnosis samples have not yet been analyzed and 14 proved to be not informative. To date, the molecular response on peripheral blood (PB) after 4 courses of R-DHAP has been assessed in 103 cases and found negative in 80 cases and positive in 22 cases (not evaluable in one case). MRD on bone marrow (BM) after 4 courses of R-DHAP has been measured in 97 cases and found negative in 59 and positive in 36 (not evaluable in one case). After ASCT, PB and BM MRD were found negative in 91 patients (95 samples have been analyzed to date) and 67 (87 samples analyzed), respectively. Thus, in the LyMa trial,CR/CRu rates after only 4 courses of RDHAP, according to Cheson 1999 and 2007 criteria, are very high confirming the major anti-tumoral impact of high-dose aracytine upfront in MCL. In addition, these encouraging results seem to be confirmed at the molecular level strengthening the interest of an MRD-guided management of MCL patients. Results will be updated at the time of the meeting and patients' outcome according to disease status will be presented. Disclosures: Ribrag: Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Immunoparesis Recovery As Predictor Marker of Progression after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4356.4356 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4356-4356 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Veronica Gonzalez De La Calle ◽

Eduardo Sobejano ◽

Julio Davila ◽

Enrique M Ocio ◽

Noemi Puig ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Lymphocyte ◽

Disease Stage ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract BACKGROUND High dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care, especially in Europe, for young and eligible multiple myeloma patients (usually younger than 65 years old). Immunoparesis is defined as a reduction (below the lower normal limit) in the levels of 1 or 2 uninvolved immunoglobulins (Ig) and it is related to a reversible suppression of B lymphocytes that correlates inversely with disease stage. B Lymphocyte reconstitution begins at 3 months after ASCT, with maximum B lymphocyte levels at 1 year after ASCT. AIMS The goal of the present study was to investigate the role of the immunoparesis recovery after ASCT as predictor of relapse or progression in multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS We reviewed medical records of MM patients who underwent to ASCT at University Hospital of Salamanca between 1992 and 2013. The primary endpoint was time to relapse or progression from ASCT. Ig (Ig G, Ig A e Ig M) were collected at the time of diagnosis, before ASCT, every 3 months during the first year after ASCT, and every year up to 5 years after ASCT among eligible patients until the relapse or disease progression. RESULTS 106 multiple myeloma patients who underwent ASCT were included in the analysis. Conventional chemotherapy was administered as induction regimen in 69 patients (65%), whereas novel agents were used in 37 patients (35%). Most patients had immunoparesis at diagnosis (91%) and at the moment of ASCT as well (94%). After a median follow-up of 62 months, median time to progression or relapse (TTP) from ASCT was 31 months (95 % CI: 24.1 - 37.1 months). MM patients with immunoparesis 1 year after ASCT had a significantly shorter median TTP as compared with patients without immunoparesis (33.5 months vs 94.2 months; HR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.13-4.05; p=0.019). In the group of patients with reduction of both Igs, median TTP was slightly inferior than in the group with reduction of only one of them(33.5 vs 36.4 months, p=0.03). Presence of ISS 3, high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis, less than partial response achieved before and three months after ASCT were also identified as predictors of progression. Multivariate analysis selected immunoparesis 1 year after ASCT as an independent variable for relapse or progression (HR: 5.97, 95% CI: 1.63-21.88; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS The lack of immunoparesis recovery at 1 year after ASCT in MM patients is associated with significantly higher risk of relapse or progression and this group of patients could potentially benefit of continuous treatment after ASCT to enhance the immune recovery. Disclosures Ocio: Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Puig:The Binding Site: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Mateos:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Upfront Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Elderly Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1989.1989 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1989-1989

Author(s):

Laurent Garderet ◽

Cyrille Touzeau ◽

Anne-Marie Stoppa ◽

Denis Caillot ◽

Lionel Karlin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Median Time ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Previous trials have shown that autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is superior to conventional chemotherapy in terms of remission rate and PFS in younger MM patients. Concerns about toxicity and potential efficacy of ASCT in older MM patients lead most centers to limit ASCT indications to patients aged <65 years. However, at the era of novel induction regimens, and because of better patient selection and supportive care, ASCT may prove to be a valid treatment option even in older MM patients. Therefore, some investigators are questioning the widely used 65 years age limit. Patients and Methods: We prospectively analyzed the outcomes of 56 consecutive MM patients who had received ASCT between September 2012 and September 2014 in 6 institutions in France (protocol ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01671826). Patients were newly diagnosed MM. For induction therapy, all patients received a bortezomib-based induction regimen (VD, VTD, VCD, or VRD, 4 to 6 cycles) according to center's local guidelines. Mobilization was performed with G-CSF or G-CSF+cyclophosphamide and plerixafor whenever needed. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of either 140 mg/m2 or 200 mg/m2 Melphalan. A short two months consolidation phase post ASCT was allowed (lenalidomide-dexamethasone, VD, VTD, VCD or VRD). No maintenance treatment was given. Response, disease progression and relapse were defined according to the IMWG uniform response criteria. All patients signed an informed consent form according to the EBMT guidelines. Results: At time of diagnosis, median age was 67 (range, 64-74) years with 23% of patients being >70 years. There were 30 males and 26 females. The immunoglobulin subtype was IgG (n=29), IgA (n=15), light chain (n=10), other (n=2). The Salmon and Durie stage was III in 89% of cases (n=47), and the ISS score was I (n=18; 35%), II (n=19; 37%), III (n=14; 27%). Patients had high risk cytogenetics features (t(4;14) and/or del17p) in 9 cases (16%). 10% of patients had a serum creatinine level >176 micromol/L. None of the patients underwent hemodialysis. The Sorror comorbidity score was 0 (34), 1 (6), 2 (2), 3 (6), 6 (1), unknown (7). The median age at time of ASCT was 68 years, and the median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 5 months. In an intention to treat analysis, out of 56 patients, 6 patients could not proceed to ASCT because of an early infectious death (n=1), serious comorbidity (n=2), disease refractoriness to induction (n=1), and failure to collect an adequate PBSC graft (n=2). A median of 5.31x106/Kg CD34+ cells could be collected. Disease status at time of ASCT was: CR (n=12; 24%), VGPR (n=19; 38%), PR (n=17; 34%), and SD/non-responding (n=2; 4%). The conditioning regimen consisted of 140mg/m² melphalan in 18 cases (36%) and 200mg/m2 in 32 patients (64%). Moreover, 4 patients (8%) received a tandem ASCT. The median time for neutrophils and platelets engraftment was 12 days. The day-100 post ASCT non-relapse mortality was 0% and the 2-year NRM was 4.2% (95% CI:[0.3-18.3]). The overall response rate at day 100 was 96% (CR: 34%, VGPR: 47%, PR: 15%, SD/non-responsive: 4%). At 3 months post ASCT, 82% patients were able to receive the planned post ASCT consolidation treatment. After a median follow-up of 12 months, the estimated progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 2 years were 76% (95%CI: [61.6-94.1]) and 88% (95%CI: [76.7-100]), respectively. The incidences of infectious complications post ASCT, and response rates were comparable between the two melphalan dose levels (p=0.28). However, in the univariate analysis, the 200 mg/m2 melphalan conditioning group showed a better OS rate compared to the 140 mg/m2 group (1-year OS: 100% vs. 67%; p=0.012). Conclusion: These prospective multicenter results indicate that ASCT is a safe and effective treatment modality for elderly, but fit MM patients at the era of novel induction agents. Of note, patients above age 70 did not experience a worse prognosis. Thus, age per se should not be used as an exclusion criterion for ASCT. Longer follow-up data will be presented, but these results already set the frame for a randomized comparison to the non-transplant approaches in this patients' subgroup. Disclosures Garderet: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Touzeau:AbbVie: Research Funding. Stoppa:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Karlin:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Dialysis-Dependent Myeloma Patients - the Diadem Study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127238 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4574-4574

Author(s):

Anna Waszczuk-Gajda ◽

Junfeng Wang ◽

Liesbeth C. de Wreede ◽

Tiarlan Sirait ◽

Zubeyde Nur Ozkurt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Safety And Efficacy

Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) patients with renal impairment (RI), especially dialysis-dependent (DD) RI, have poorer outcomes than MM patients with normal renal function. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a treatment option, but there is concern at a perceived higher risk of complications which may be limiting consideration of the use of ASCT in this population. The evidence is inconsistent among studies and interpretation is complicated by heterogeneous datasets, some dating to before the availability of novel agents. Finally, the reversibility of RI following ASCT is an important prognostic factor for both survival and quality of life. Aim To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ASCT in MM patients with DD RI transplanted in EBMT centres between 1997 and 2017. Methods Baseline characteristics at diagnosis, patient treatment regimens and clinical outcomes were collected using standardised report forms. OS was defined as the period between the date of ASCT and the date of death or the date of last observation. PFS was defined as the period between the date of ASCT and date of progression/relapse or death of any causes or the date of the last observation. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was applied to assess risk factors for progression and death. Survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. P<0.05 was judged as statistically significant. Results A total of 109,959 adult MM patients are registered in the EBMT database as having undergone ASCT between 1997 and 2017. We further analysed 118 DD MM patients who had a first ASCT during this period. The median (range) age was 57 (27-71) years. Seventy (59%) patients were males. Forty nine patients (49/94 patients, 52%) had Karnofsky score ≥90. One hundred and ten patients were treated with hemodialysis and eight with peritoneal dialysis. A total of 68 (58%) patients had Light Chain MM, 43 kappa and 25 Lambda. In first-line induction therapy, 47/76 (62%) patients received bortezomib-based regimens. Forty-four (37%) patients achieved at least VGPR pre-ASCT. The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 0.7 years (0.3-4.9). Melphalan doses were as follows: 140 mg/m2 (n=55, 67%), 70-100 mg/m2 (n=15, 18%), and >140 mg/m2 (n=12, 15%). The times to Neutrophil (>0.5) and Platelet (>20) engraftment were 12 (10-37) and 14 (4-128) days, respectively. The 30-day and 100-day transplant-related mortality (TRM) rates were 0.0% and 0.9%, respectively. ASCT was associated with a significant deepening of response (at least VGPR pre- vs post-ASCT: 36/93 (39%) vs 48/93 (52%), p < 0.001). The median PFS was 37 months (95% CI: 24-43) and 5-year PFS was 31% (95% CI: 20-41). The median OS was 102 months (95% CI: 67-129). Five-year OS post-ASCT was 62% (52-72) and 10-year OS 36% (17-55). Thirty-one (26%) DD MM patients achieved dialysis independence. There were no differences in PFS or OS when comparing the 1997-2007 and 2008-2017 cohorts: 5-year PFS - 28% (6-49) vs 31% (19-43) (p=0.7) and 5-year OS - 61% (38-84) vs 63% (51-74) (p=0.9), respectively. On univariate analysis of factors affecting PFS, achievement of an Overall Response Rate (ORR) (CR+VGPR+PR vs. Other) pre-ASCT was associated with a lower risk (HR 0.467, p=0.032) and older age (>55 years) with a higher risk (HR 1.786, p=0.035) of post-ASCT progression. Age higher than 55 (HR 2.033, 95%CI: 0.992 - 4.166, p=0.053) increased and achievement of at least VGPR pre-transplant (HR 0.494, 95%CI: 0.224 - 1.091, p=0.081, on the verge of statistical significance) decreased the risk of death. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, the DIADEM study is the largest analysis of ASCT in DD MM pts to date. This cohort of 118 unselected patients had an OS comparable to patients without RI. This may reflect patient selection based on younger age, Karnofsky scores and pre-ASCT response. The low TRM and excellent outcomes support consideration of the use of ASCT in pts with DD RI. Notably, more than a quarter of patients became dialysis independent, an outcome likely to confer an improved Quality-of-Life.. These results can also inform the debate around the role of renal transplantation in younger DD MM patients who do not achieve dialysis independence. Disclosures Snowden: IDMC: Honoraria; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Dreger:MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Sponsoring of Symposia; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Riemser, Roche: Consultancy; AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis, Riemser, Roche: Speakers Bureau; Neovii, Riemser: Research Funding. Illés:Takeda, Seattle: Research Funding; Janssen, Celgene, Novartis, Takeda, Roche, Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Basak:Teva: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Gyan:Pfizer: Honoraria. Hayden:Alnylam: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Beksac:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen&Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Schönland:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medac: Other: Travel Grant; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Modified High-Dose Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (mHDM/SCT) In the Treatment of AL Amyloidosis (AL) and/or High-Risk Myeloma (hM): Analysis of SWOG Trial S0115

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2004.2004 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2004-2004

Author(s):

Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽

Antje Hoering ◽

David C Seldin ◽

Kathleen T Finn ◽

Salli A Fennessey ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

High Dose ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Abstract 2004 Treatment of AL amyloidosis (AL) and myeloma (M) with high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM/SCT) is effective in inducing hematologic remissions and improving survival. However, the benefit of HDM/SCT in AL and host-based high-risk myeloma (hM) has not been explored in a multi-center study. We designed a trial of two cycles of modified high dose melphalan at 100 mg/m2 and autologous stem cell transplantation (mHDM/SCT) through SWOG 0115 (ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier: NCT00064337). The primary objective was to evaluate overall survival and additional objectives were to determine hematologic responses and tolerability of two cycles of mHDM/SCT in AL and hM in a multicenter study. Eligibility for patients with AL required evidence of tissue diagnosis of amyloidosis, underlying associated plasma cell dyscrasia, and adequate measures of performance status (Zubrod 0–2) and cardiopulmonary function (LVEF >45%, DLCO >50%). Eligibility for hM patients required age >70 years and/or serum creatinine of >2 mg/dL or calculated creatinine clearance of <50 mL/kg/min. Peripheral blood stem cells were collected following G-CSF alone with minimum yield of 7.0×106 CD34+ cells/kg required for participation in the trial. From 1/2004 to 11/2010, 70 eligible patients with AL (61 with AL and 9 with myeloma associated AL) and 27 with hM were enrolled at 17 centers in the US. The median age was 64 years (range; 33–79) and M:F ratio was 1.6:1. The median number of organs involved was 2 (range, 1–8). There were 22 patients (31%) with cardiac involvement. The median serum creatinine level was 1.7 mg/dL (range, 0.6–10.0) for patients with hM. There are 68 patients with AL and 25 patients with hM eligible for survival and 67 patients with AL and 25 patients with hM eligible for adverse event analysis at this time. The treatment-related mortality (TRM), defined as deaths within 100 days of registration (even without protocol-directed treatment) was 9% (n=9/97). TRM was 10% (n=7/70) for AL and 7% (n=2/27) for hM. TRM was 14% (n=3/22) for patients with AL and cardiac involvement. Grade 3 and higher non-hematologic adverse events by CTCAEv3.0 were experienced by 75% (n=50/67) of AL patients and 80% (n=20/25) of hM patients. The median overall survival is 68 months for AL with a median follow up for surviving patients of 40.6 months (range; 1.2–79). The median survival for hM patients has not been reached yet with a median follow-up of 34 months. The 5-year survival is 55% for AL and 54% for hM patients; and the median progression-free-survival is 43 months for AL and 31 months for hM. Hematologic responses, defined by the standard consensus criteria, were achieved by 39% (n=11/28) evaluable patients for AL and 57% (n=4/7) for hM following SCT. Clinical and organ responses were also evident at 1 year following HDM/SCT. Thirty % (n=3/10) patients with AL experienced cardiac response. In conclusion, this experience demonstrates that with careful selection of patients, mHDM for SCT in patients with AL amyloidosis and hM, even in the setting of a multicenter study, can lead to prolonged overall survival with acceptable TRM and morbidity. Disclosures: Holmberg: Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium-Takeda: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Evaluating the PET Parameters SUVmax and TMTV in the Setting of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for DLBCL

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-135920 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 38-38

Author(s):

Rachel Brown ◽

Alessandro Lambertini ◽

Michael S Hofman ◽

Mathias Bressel ◽

Michael P Macmanus ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Relative Change

Introduction Where tolerated,high dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Disease recurrence post-ASCT however is common and carries an extremely poor prognosis, highlighting the need for improved pre-transplant prognostic stratification. This study investigates the prognostic utility of the PET parameters total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV) and standardised uptake value (SUV)max in the peri-transplant setting. Methods 125 patients underwent ASCT for relapsed or refractory DLBCL between 1/1/2002 and 31/1/2017 at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre. All patients received multi-agent salvage immuno-chemotherapy before proceeding to ASCT. 58 patients were treated with peri-transplant radiotherapy, with indications including incomplete response post-salvage therapy, and bulky and/or localised disease. 122 patients had their treatment response assessed with PET. TMTV and SUVmax were measured at time of primary disease relapse/progression prior to salvage immuno-chemotherapy (pre-salvage PET) and post-salvage immuno-chemotherapy prior to ASCT (pre-ASCT PET). 93 patients had pre-salvage and pre-ASCT PETs available for TMTV and SUVmax measurement. Results Median follow up was 5.6 years. The 5-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 52% (95% CI: 42-60) and 65% (95% CI: 56-73). In patients demonstrating complete metabolic response (CMR) and non-CMR on pre-ASCT PET the 5-year PFS was 58% (95% CI: 44-70) and 44% (95% CI: 29-57) respectively. The 5-year OS with CMR and non-CMR on pre-ASCT PET was 73% (95% CI: 59-83) and 54% (95% CI: 39-67). TMTV and SUVmax were investigated as potential prognostic factors in the peri-transplant setting. In this patient group, pre-salvage TMTV and SUVmax were not found to be of prognostic significance. Pre-salvage TMTV and SUVmax PFS hazard ratios (HR)s were 1.06 per 100ml (95% CI:0.96-1.17; p = 0.27) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.03; p = 0.78) respectively, and OS HRs were 1.10 per 100ml (95% CI: 0.86-1.18; p = 0.07) and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.96-1.04 p = 0.24). In contrast, pre-ASCT TMTV was a significant negative prognostic factor for both PFS (HR = 1.22 per 100ml; 95%CI: 1.10-1.37; p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.96 per 100ml; 95% CI: 1.38-2.79; p < 0.001). Pre-ASCT SUVmax similarly demonstrated a negative association with PFS (HR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04-1.10; p < 0.001) and OS (HR of 1.08 ; 95% CI: 1.04-1.11; p < 0.001). In addition to the TMTV and SUVmax absolute values, the relative change from pre-salvage to pre-ASCT PET was investigated for prognostic value. No significant association with PFS or OS was demonstrated for the relative change of either parameter. The relative change in TMTV had a HRs of 1.21 (95% CI: 0.54- 2.72; p = 0.65) and 1.15 (95% CI: 0.45-2.93; p = 0.77) for PFS and OS respectively, and relative change in SUVmax had a HRs of 1.30 (95% CI: 0.68- 2.50; p = 0.43) and 1.20 (CI 95% 0.57-2.54; p = 0.64) for PFS and OS. Conclusion As prognostic tools, pre-ASCT TMTV and SUVmax were both predictors for PFS and OS. In contrast, pre-salvage TMTV and SUVmax did not demonstrate an association with PFS or OS, reinforcing the prognostic significance of the pre-ASCT PET scan. The relative change in SUVmax and TMTV were similarly not associated with PFS and OS. These findings indicate that in the context of TMTV and SUVmax measurement, residual disease on pre-ASCT PET may be of greater predictive value than degree of response to salvage immuno-chemotherapy. While TMTV and SUVmax have primarily been studied in the context of first-line therapy for DLBCL, these results suggest a promising prognostic role for these PET parameters in the peri-transplant setting. Disclosures Seymour: AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy; Nurix: Honoraria; Mei Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dickinson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Intensified Cytarabine Dose during Consolidation Therapy in AML Patients Under 65 Years Is Not Associated with Survival Benefit

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146606 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1242-1242

Author(s):

Maher Hanoun ◽

Leo Ruhnke ◽

Michael Kramer ◽

Kerstin Schäfer-Eckhard ◽

Björn Steffen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Disease Characteristics ◽

First Remission

Abstract Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by a high relapse rate, indicating insufficient clearance of leukemia-initiating cells. Depending on genetic risk stratification, consolidating chemotherapy proves to significantly reduce the risk of relapse. In particular, in younger AML patients higher dosage of cytarabine appears to improve long-term outcome, while there is no apparent benefit of multiagent combination, compared to cytarabine monotherapy. However, to this end the optimal dosage of single agent cytarabine in consolidation therapy after 7+3 remission induction remains elusive. Methods: Here, we retrospectively assessed the impact of different dosages of cytarabine consolidation on outcome in a large real-world data set from the German Study Alliance Leukemia-Acute Myeloid Leukemia (SAL-AML) registry. Patients below 65 years of age, registered between April 2005 and September 2020 with non-acute promyelocytic leukemia, who attained complete remission after intensive induction and received at least one consolidation cycle with intermediate (IDAC) or high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) were selected. To account for differences in patient and disease characteristics between both groups, the average treatment effect was estimated by propensity score weighting. Results: 642 patients received HiDAC consolidation with a median dosage of 5794.88 (IQR, 4745.48-5971.56) mg/m 2/d with a median number of 3 cycles (IQR, 2-3), whereas 178 patients received IDAC consolidation with 1946.16 (IQR, 1869.51-2469.15) mg/m 2/d with a median of 2 cycles (IQR, 1-3). IDAC-treated patients showed in average a higher age (median (IQR) 58.5 (49-62) years vs. 50 (41-56) years) and more comorbidities with 43.8% having an HCT-CI score of 2-4, compared to 22.3% among HiDAC-treated patients. Alongside, significantly more secondary (5.1% vs. 3.1%) and therapy-related (12.4% vs. 4.1%) AML as well as more adverse (14.5% vs. 6.5%) and less favorable (40.6% vs. 56%) genetic risk features according to ELN 2017 risk classification were found among IDAC-treated patients. After propensity score weighting for differences in patient and disease characteristics, overall survival after 5 years was comparable between HiDAC-treated (71.1 %) and IDAC-treated (67.7%) patients. Moreover, no significant differences in relapse-free survival were observed after 5 years (47.4 vs. 45.2%). Notably, more patients treated with IDAC received allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission (37.6 vs. 19.8%) while significantly more HiDAC-treated patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation in relapse (30.8 vs. 20.2%). Censoring for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission revealed no significant survival difference with regard to cytarabine dosage. Considering only ELN favorable risk AML patients, there was no difference in 5-years overall (80.5% vs. 83.9%) nor relapse-free (57.7% vs. 56.8%) survival. Of note, significantly more patients treated with HiDAC suffered from ≥3 CTCAE infectious complications (56.7 vs. 44.1%), which was more striking in patients above 50 years of age. The rate of other ≥3 CTCAE non-hematological toxicities and secondary malignancies was comparable in both treatment groups. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis suggests no significant benefit of high dose cytarabine compared to intermediate dosages in consolidation for AML patients under 65 years of age, independent of ELN risk group. Disclosures Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Schliemann: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Haenel: Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Brummendorf: Takepart Media: Honoraria; Repeat Diagnostics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers: Research Funding. Fransecky: Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Medac: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Einsele: Janssen, Celgene/BMS, Amgen, GSK, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Held: MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Acortech Biopharma: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Platzbecker: Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Baldus: Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria. Mueller-Tidow: Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Hospital in the Home Delivery of Supportive Care for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: A Novel Single Centre Patient Focused Approach

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-154290 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1834-1834

Author(s):

David Routledge ◽

Simon J Harrison ◽

Trish Joyce ◽

Seok Lim ◽

Michael Montalto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Supportive Care ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Royal Melbourne Hospital ◽

Bed Days

Abstract Introduction: High dose therapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) has traditionally been performed as an inpatient procedure. However, with improvements in care and patient selection it is possible to safely deliver conditioning chemotherapy and supportive care in an Daytherapy setting (Kodad SG et al., 2019). While deemed an "outpatient procedure" this method is often delivered on large day units which requires the patient to attend daily, often only spending overnight at home. To reduce these daily visits the Clinical Haematology Department of Peter MacCallum and Royal Melbourne Hospital (CHD) in collaboration with the Hospital in the Home department (HIHD) at Royal Melbourne Hospital developed an innovative program to safely deliver supportive care for Myeloma Patients undergoing ASCT at home (HIH-ASCT). The HIHD is an acute inpatient unit that exists as a "virtual" inpatient ward. Patients are reviewed daily by a HIHD Doctor with twice daily visits by a HIHD Nurse for administration of supportive care measures (e.g. intravenous electrolyte and fluid replacement) in the comfort of their home. Here we report on the safety outcomes of our HIH-ASCT program, specifically patient complications and outcomes. Methods: A retrospective case note audit identified 54 consecutive HIH-ASCT patients who received HIH-ASCT for Myeloma between 2018 and 2021 under HIHD. Patients were eligible for our HIH-ASCT program if they had Myeloma requiring ASCT; an ECOG ≤1; had not been admitted to ICU previously; lived within 30 minutes drive of the hospital; had a safe home environment (for both the patient and visiting staff) and a carer who could stay with them throughout their HIH-ASCT. While undertaking HIH-ASCT patients did not receive prophylactic antibiotics and they were not routinely given GCSF to minimise the risk of engraftment fevers. Results: Of those treated as HIH-ASCT patients the median age was 60 years (range 33-72). 39% patients were female (n=21) and 61% male (n=33). Underlying disease groups included IgA (n=8; 15%), IgG (n=35; 64%), IgM (n=1; 2%), Light Chain (n=9; 17%) and Oligosecretory (n=1; 2%). 43% had High-risk Cytogenetics. ASCT-1 (n=48; 88%), ASCT-2 (n=5; 9%) and one patient underwent a ASCT-Tandem (both under HIHD). Conditioning regimes included Melphalan200 (n=37; 68%), Velcade-Melphan200 (n=13; 23%) and Carfilzomib-Melphalan200 (n=5; 9%). The average stem dose was 3.80 x10 6/kg (range 2.14-8.4). Median time to Neutrophil engraftment was 12 days (range = 10-21) and Platelet engraftment 12 days (range = 8-18). The total number of bed days saved through the HIH-ASCT program was 466, with a median length of stay (LOS) under the HIHD team of 9 days (Range = 3-14). In addition, 3 patients were not readmitted to the hospital (6%) and were discharged directly from the HIHD team. The most common reason for readmission was fever (n=43; 80%), of which only 11 were culture positive, and diarrhoea (n=44; 81%). Only 1 patient required intensive care support. There were no deaths. The median LOS as an inpatient once readmitted was 6 days (range = 2-27). In regards to cost savings, an acute inpatient bed under the CHD is approximately $1300 USD versus $900 USD per day for a HIHD bed. This equated to a potential cost saving for the CHD of approximately $186000 USD. Conclusion: The delivery of supportive care for patients undergoing HIH-ASCT in is both safe and effective with comparable outcomes for what would be expected for an inpatient cohort. It resulted in a median of 9 bed days saved per patient (total number of bed days saved = 466). This is important as it allowed our department to increase bed capacity across the unit without the associated costs of building a new ward. In addition, during our COVID-19 outbreaks the HIH-ASCT program has allowed us to continue to deliver optimal patient care, while minimising the infection risk for our patients. More recently we have introduced remote monitoring (e.g. temperature, heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturations) with video reviews with the aim of increasing the capacity of our HIHD and further improving the HIH-ASCT experience for our patients. Disclosures Routledge: Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria. Harrison: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Eusa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/ Juno/ BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Terumo BCT: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Haemalogix: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ritchie: CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; CSL: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding.

Download Full-text