Hospital in the Home Delivery of Supportive Care for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: A Novel Single Centre Patient Focused Approach

Abstract Introduction: High dose therapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) has traditionally been performed as an inpatient procedure. However, with improvements in care and patient selection it is possible to safely deliver conditioning chemotherapy and supportive care in an Daytherapy setting (Kodad SG et al., 2019). While deemed an "outpatient procedure" this method is often delivered on large day units which requires the patient to attend daily, often only spending overnight at home. To reduce these daily visits the Clinical Haematology Department of Peter MacCallum and Royal Melbourne Hospital (CHD) in collaboration with the Hospital in the Home department (HIHD) at Royal Melbourne Hospital developed an innovative program to safely deliver supportive care for Myeloma Patients undergoing ASCT at home (HIH-ASCT). The HIHD is an acute inpatient unit that exists as a "virtual" inpatient ward. Patients are reviewed daily by a HIHD Doctor with twice daily visits by a HIHD Nurse for administration of supportive care measures (e.g. intravenous electrolyte and fluid replacement) in the comfort of their home. Here we report on the safety outcomes of our HIH-ASCT program, specifically patient complications and outcomes. Methods: A retrospective case note audit identified 54 consecutive HIH-ASCT patients who received HIH-ASCT for Myeloma between 2018 and 2021 under HIHD. Patients were eligible for our HIH-ASCT program if they had Myeloma requiring ASCT; an ECOG ≤1; had not been admitted to ICU previously; lived within 30 minutes drive of the hospital; had a safe home environment (for both the patient and visiting staff) and a carer who could stay with them throughout their HIH-ASCT. While undertaking HIH-ASCT patients did not receive prophylactic antibiotics and they were not routinely given GCSF to minimise the risk of engraftment fevers. Results: Of those treated as HIH-ASCT patients the median age was 60 years (range 33-72). 39% patients were female (n=21) and 61% male (n=33). Underlying disease groups included IgA (n=8; 15%), IgG (n=35; 64%), IgM (n=1; 2%), Light Chain (n=9; 17%) and Oligosecretory (n=1; 2%). 43% had High-risk Cytogenetics. ASCT-1 (n=48; 88%), ASCT-2 (n=5; 9%) and one patient underwent a ASCT-Tandem (both under HIHD). Conditioning regimes included Melphalan200 (n=37; 68%), Velcade-Melphan200 (n=13; 23%) and Carfilzomib-Melphalan200 (n=5; 9%). The average stem dose was 3.80 x10 6/kg (range 2.14-8.4). Median time to Neutrophil engraftment was 12 days (range = 10-21) and Platelet engraftment 12 days (range = 8-18). The total number of bed days saved through the HIH-ASCT program was 466, with a median length of stay (LOS) under the HIHD team of 9 days (Range = 3-14). In addition, 3 patients were not readmitted to the hospital (6%) and were discharged directly from the HIHD team. The most common reason for readmission was fever (n=43; 80%), of which only 11 were culture positive, and diarrhoea (n=44; 81%). Only 1 patient required intensive care support. There were no deaths. The median LOS as an inpatient once readmitted was 6 days (range = 2-27). In regards to cost savings, an acute inpatient bed under the CHD is approximately $1300 USD versus $900 USD per day for a HIHD bed. This equated to a potential cost saving for the CHD of approximately $186000 USD. Conclusion: The delivery of supportive care for patients undergoing HIH-ASCT in is both safe and effective with comparable outcomes for what would be expected for an inpatient cohort. It resulted in a median of 9 bed days saved per patient (total number of bed days saved = 466). This is important as it allowed our department to increase bed capacity across the unit without the associated costs of building a new ward. In addition, during our COVID-19 outbreaks the HIH-ASCT program has allowed us to continue to deliver optimal patient care, while minimising the infection risk for our patients. More recently we have introduced remote monitoring (e.g. temperature, heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturations) with video reviews with the aim of increasing the capacity of our HIHD and further improving the HIH-ASCT experience for our patients. Disclosures Routledge: Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria. Harrison: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Eusa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/ Juno/ BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Terumo BCT: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Haemalogix: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ritchie: CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; CSL: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Immunoparesis Recovery As Predictor Marker of Progression after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4356.4356 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4356-4356 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Veronica Gonzalez De La Calle ◽

Eduardo Sobejano ◽

Julio Davila ◽

Enrique M Ocio ◽

Noemi Puig ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Lymphocyte ◽

Disease Stage ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract BACKGROUND High dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care, especially in Europe, for young and eligible multiple myeloma patients (usually younger than 65 years old). Immunoparesis is defined as a reduction (below the lower normal limit) in the levels of 1 or 2 uninvolved immunoglobulins (Ig) and it is related to a reversible suppression of B lymphocytes that correlates inversely with disease stage. B Lymphocyte reconstitution begins at 3 months after ASCT, with maximum B lymphocyte levels at 1 year after ASCT. AIMS The goal of the present study was to investigate the role of the immunoparesis recovery after ASCT as predictor of relapse or progression in multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS We reviewed medical records of MM patients who underwent to ASCT at University Hospital of Salamanca between 1992 and 2013. The primary endpoint was time to relapse or progression from ASCT. Ig (Ig G, Ig A e Ig M) were collected at the time of diagnosis, before ASCT, every 3 months during the first year after ASCT, and every year up to 5 years after ASCT among eligible patients until the relapse or disease progression. RESULTS 106 multiple myeloma patients who underwent ASCT were included in the analysis. Conventional chemotherapy was administered as induction regimen in 69 patients (65%), whereas novel agents were used in 37 patients (35%). Most patients had immunoparesis at diagnosis (91%) and at the moment of ASCT as well (94%). After a median follow-up of 62 months, median time to progression or relapse (TTP) from ASCT was 31 months (95 % CI: 24.1 - 37.1 months). MM patients with immunoparesis 1 year after ASCT had a significantly shorter median TTP as compared with patients without immunoparesis (33.5 months vs 94.2 months; HR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.13-4.05; p=0.019). In the group of patients with reduction of both Igs, median TTP was slightly inferior than in the group with reduction of only one of them(33.5 vs 36.4 months, p=0.03). Presence of ISS 3, high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis, less than partial response achieved before and three months after ASCT were also identified as predictors of progression. Multivariate analysis selected immunoparesis 1 year after ASCT as an independent variable for relapse or progression (HR: 5.97, 95% CI: 1.63-21.88; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS The lack of immunoparesis recovery at 1 year after ASCT in MM patients is associated with significantly higher risk of relapse or progression and this group of patients could potentially benefit of continuous treatment after ASCT to enhance the immune recovery. Disclosures Ocio: Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Puig:The Binding Site: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Mateos:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Upfront Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Elderly Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1989.1989 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1989-1989

Author(s):

Laurent Garderet ◽

Cyrille Touzeau ◽

Anne-Marie Stoppa ◽

Denis Caillot ◽

Lionel Karlin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Median Time ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Previous trials have shown that autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is superior to conventional chemotherapy in terms of remission rate and PFS in younger MM patients. Concerns about toxicity and potential efficacy of ASCT in older MM patients lead most centers to limit ASCT indications to patients aged <65 years. However, at the era of novel induction regimens, and because of better patient selection and supportive care, ASCT may prove to be a valid treatment option even in older MM patients. Therefore, some investigators are questioning the widely used 65 years age limit. Patients and Methods: We prospectively analyzed the outcomes of 56 consecutive MM patients who had received ASCT between September 2012 and September 2014 in 6 institutions in France (protocol ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01671826). Patients were newly diagnosed MM. For induction therapy, all patients received a bortezomib-based induction regimen (VD, VTD, VCD, or VRD, 4 to 6 cycles) according to center's local guidelines. Mobilization was performed with G-CSF or G-CSF+cyclophosphamide and plerixafor whenever needed. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of either 140 mg/m2 or 200 mg/m2 Melphalan. A short two months consolidation phase post ASCT was allowed (lenalidomide-dexamethasone, VD, VTD, VCD or VRD). No maintenance treatment was given. Response, disease progression and relapse were defined according to the IMWG uniform response criteria. All patients signed an informed consent form according to the EBMT guidelines. Results: At time of diagnosis, median age was 67 (range, 64-74) years with 23% of patients being >70 years. There were 30 males and 26 females. The immunoglobulin subtype was IgG (n=29), IgA (n=15), light chain (n=10), other (n=2). The Salmon and Durie stage was III in 89% of cases (n=47), and the ISS score was I (n=18; 35%), II (n=19; 37%), III (n=14; 27%). Patients had high risk cytogenetics features (t(4;14) and/or del17p) in 9 cases (16%). 10% of patients had a serum creatinine level >176 micromol/L. None of the patients underwent hemodialysis. The Sorror comorbidity score was 0 (34), 1 (6), 2 (2), 3 (6), 6 (1), unknown (7). The median age at time of ASCT was 68 years, and the median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 5 months. In an intention to treat analysis, out of 56 patients, 6 patients could not proceed to ASCT because of an early infectious death (n=1), serious comorbidity (n=2), disease refractoriness to induction (n=1), and failure to collect an adequate PBSC graft (n=2). A median of 5.31x106/Kg CD34+ cells could be collected. Disease status at time of ASCT was: CR (n=12; 24%), VGPR (n=19; 38%), PR (n=17; 34%), and SD/non-responding (n=2; 4%). The conditioning regimen consisted of 140mg/m² melphalan in 18 cases (36%) and 200mg/m2 in 32 patients (64%). Moreover, 4 patients (8%) received a tandem ASCT. The median time for neutrophils and platelets engraftment was 12 days. The day-100 post ASCT non-relapse mortality was 0% and the 2-year NRM was 4.2% (95% CI:[0.3-18.3]). The overall response rate at day 100 was 96% (CR: 34%, VGPR: 47%, PR: 15%, SD/non-responsive: 4%). At 3 months post ASCT, 82% patients were able to receive the planned post ASCT consolidation treatment. After a median follow-up of 12 months, the estimated progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 2 years were 76% (95%CI: [61.6-94.1]) and 88% (95%CI: [76.7-100]), respectively. The incidences of infectious complications post ASCT, and response rates were comparable between the two melphalan dose levels (p=0.28). However, in the univariate analysis, the 200 mg/m2 melphalan conditioning group showed a better OS rate compared to the 140 mg/m2 group (1-year OS: 100% vs. 67%; p=0.012). Conclusion: These prospective multicenter results indicate that ASCT is a safe and effective treatment modality for elderly, but fit MM patients at the era of novel induction agents. Of note, patients above age 70 did not experience a worse prognosis. Thus, age per se should not be used as an exclusion criterion for ASCT. Longer follow-up data will be presented, but these results already set the frame for a randomized comparison to the non-transplant approaches in this patients' subgroup. Disclosures Garderet: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Touzeau:AbbVie: Research Funding. Stoppa:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Karlin:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Dialysis-Dependent Myeloma Patients - the Diadem Study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127238 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4574-4574

Author(s):

Anna Waszczuk-Gajda ◽

Junfeng Wang ◽

Liesbeth C. de Wreede ◽

Tiarlan Sirait ◽

Zubeyde Nur Ozkurt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Safety And Efficacy

Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) patients with renal impairment (RI), especially dialysis-dependent (DD) RI, have poorer outcomes than MM patients with normal renal function. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a treatment option, but there is concern at a perceived higher risk of complications which may be limiting consideration of the use of ASCT in this population. The evidence is inconsistent among studies and interpretation is complicated by heterogeneous datasets, some dating to before the availability of novel agents. Finally, the reversibility of RI following ASCT is an important prognostic factor for both survival and quality of life. Aim To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ASCT in MM patients with DD RI transplanted in EBMT centres between 1997 and 2017. Methods Baseline characteristics at diagnosis, patient treatment regimens and clinical outcomes were collected using standardised report forms. OS was defined as the period between the date of ASCT and the date of death or the date of last observation. PFS was defined as the period between the date of ASCT and date of progression/relapse or death of any causes or the date of the last observation. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was applied to assess risk factors for progression and death. Survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. P<0.05 was judged as statistically significant. Results A total of 109,959 adult MM patients are registered in the EBMT database as having undergone ASCT between 1997 and 2017. We further analysed 118 DD MM patients who had a first ASCT during this period. The median (range) age was 57 (27-71) years. Seventy (59%) patients were males. Forty nine patients (49/94 patients, 52%) had Karnofsky score ≥90. One hundred and ten patients were treated with hemodialysis and eight with peritoneal dialysis. A total of 68 (58%) patients had Light Chain MM, 43 kappa and 25 Lambda. In first-line induction therapy, 47/76 (62%) patients received bortezomib-based regimens. Forty-four (37%) patients achieved at least VGPR pre-ASCT. The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 0.7 years (0.3-4.9). Melphalan doses were as follows: 140 mg/m2 (n=55, 67%), 70-100 mg/m2 (n=15, 18%), and >140 mg/m2 (n=12, 15%). The times to Neutrophil (>0.5) and Platelet (>20) engraftment were 12 (10-37) and 14 (4-128) days, respectively. The 30-day and 100-day transplant-related mortality (TRM) rates were 0.0% and 0.9%, respectively. ASCT was associated with a significant deepening of response (at least VGPR pre- vs post-ASCT: 36/93 (39%) vs 48/93 (52%), p < 0.001). The median PFS was 37 months (95% CI: 24-43) and 5-year PFS was 31% (95% CI: 20-41). The median OS was 102 months (95% CI: 67-129). Five-year OS post-ASCT was 62% (52-72) and 10-year OS 36% (17-55). Thirty-one (26%) DD MM patients achieved dialysis independence. There were no differences in PFS or OS when comparing the 1997-2007 and 2008-2017 cohorts: 5-year PFS - 28% (6-49) vs 31% (19-43) (p=0.7) and 5-year OS - 61% (38-84) vs 63% (51-74) (p=0.9), respectively. On univariate analysis of factors affecting PFS, achievement of an Overall Response Rate (ORR) (CR+VGPR+PR vs. Other) pre-ASCT was associated with a lower risk (HR 0.467, p=0.032) and older age (>55 years) with a higher risk (HR 1.786, p=0.035) of post-ASCT progression. Age higher than 55 (HR 2.033, 95%CI: 0.992 - 4.166, p=0.053) increased and achievement of at least VGPR pre-transplant (HR 0.494, 95%CI: 0.224 - 1.091, p=0.081, on the verge of statistical significance) decreased the risk of death. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, the DIADEM study is the largest analysis of ASCT in DD MM pts to date. This cohort of 118 unselected patients had an OS comparable to patients without RI. This may reflect patient selection based on younger age, Karnofsky scores and pre-ASCT response. The low TRM and excellent outcomes support consideration of the use of ASCT in pts with DD RI. Notably, more than a quarter of patients became dialysis independent, an outcome likely to confer an improved Quality-of-Life.. These results can also inform the debate around the role of renal transplantation in younger DD MM patients who do not achieve dialysis independence. Disclosures Snowden: IDMC: Honoraria; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Dreger:MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Sponsoring of Symposia; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Riemser, Roche: Consultancy; AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis, Riemser, Roche: Speakers Bureau; Neovii, Riemser: Research Funding. Illés:Takeda, Seattle: Research Funding; Janssen, Celgene, Novartis, Takeda, Roche, Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Basak:Teva: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Gyan:Pfizer: Honoraria. Hayden:Alnylam: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Beksac:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen&Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Schönland:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medac: Other: Travel Grant; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Evaluating the PET Parameters SUVmax and TMTV in the Setting of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for DLBCL

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-135920 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 38-38

Author(s):

Rachel Brown ◽

Alessandro Lambertini ◽

Michael S Hofman ◽

Mathias Bressel ◽

Michael P Macmanus ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Relative Change

Introduction Where tolerated,high dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Disease recurrence post-ASCT however is common and carries an extremely poor prognosis, highlighting the need for improved pre-transplant prognostic stratification. This study investigates the prognostic utility of the PET parameters total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV) and standardised uptake value (SUV)max in the peri-transplant setting. Methods 125 patients underwent ASCT for relapsed or refractory DLBCL between 1/1/2002 and 31/1/2017 at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre. All patients received multi-agent salvage immuno-chemotherapy before proceeding to ASCT. 58 patients were treated with peri-transplant radiotherapy, with indications including incomplete response post-salvage therapy, and bulky and/or localised disease. 122 patients had their treatment response assessed with PET. TMTV and SUVmax were measured at time of primary disease relapse/progression prior to salvage immuno-chemotherapy (pre-salvage PET) and post-salvage immuno-chemotherapy prior to ASCT (pre-ASCT PET). 93 patients had pre-salvage and pre-ASCT PETs available for TMTV and SUVmax measurement. Results Median follow up was 5.6 years. The 5-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 52% (95% CI: 42-60) and 65% (95% CI: 56-73). In patients demonstrating complete metabolic response (CMR) and non-CMR on pre-ASCT PET the 5-year PFS was 58% (95% CI: 44-70) and 44% (95% CI: 29-57) respectively. The 5-year OS with CMR and non-CMR on pre-ASCT PET was 73% (95% CI: 59-83) and 54% (95% CI: 39-67). TMTV and SUVmax were investigated as potential prognostic factors in the peri-transplant setting. In this patient group, pre-salvage TMTV and SUVmax were not found to be of prognostic significance. Pre-salvage TMTV and SUVmax PFS hazard ratios (HR)s were 1.06 per 100ml (95% CI:0.96-1.17; p = 0.27) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.03; p = 0.78) respectively, and OS HRs were 1.10 per 100ml (95% CI: 0.86-1.18; p = 0.07) and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.96-1.04 p = 0.24). In contrast, pre-ASCT TMTV was a significant negative prognostic factor for both PFS (HR = 1.22 per 100ml; 95%CI: 1.10-1.37; p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.96 per 100ml; 95% CI: 1.38-2.79; p < 0.001). Pre-ASCT SUVmax similarly demonstrated a negative association with PFS (HR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04-1.10; p < 0.001) and OS (HR of 1.08 ; 95% CI: 1.04-1.11; p < 0.001). In addition to the TMTV and SUVmax absolute values, the relative change from pre-salvage to pre-ASCT PET was investigated for prognostic value. No significant association with PFS or OS was demonstrated for the relative change of either parameter. The relative change in TMTV had a HRs of 1.21 (95% CI: 0.54- 2.72; p = 0.65) and 1.15 (95% CI: 0.45-2.93; p = 0.77) for PFS and OS respectively, and relative change in SUVmax had a HRs of 1.30 (95% CI: 0.68- 2.50; p = 0.43) and 1.20 (CI 95% 0.57-2.54; p = 0.64) for PFS and OS. Conclusion As prognostic tools, pre-ASCT TMTV and SUVmax were both predictors for PFS and OS. In contrast, pre-salvage TMTV and SUVmax did not demonstrate an association with PFS or OS, reinforcing the prognostic significance of the pre-ASCT PET scan. The relative change in SUVmax and TMTV were similarly not associated with PFS and OS. These findings indicate that in the context of TMTV and SUVmax measurement, residual disease on pre-ASCT PET may be of greater predictive value than degree of response to salvage immuno-chemotherapy. While TMTV and SUVmax have primarily been studied in the context of first-line therapy for DLBCL, these results suggest a promising prognostic role for these PET parameters in the peri-transplant setting. Disclosures Seymour: AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy; Nurix: Honoraria; Mei Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dickinson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Trial of Venetoclax in Combination with BEAM Conditioning Chemotherapy (V-BEAM) with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124602 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5705-5705

Author(s):

Allison M. Winter ◽

Kirsten M Boughan ◽

Jack Khouri ◽

Paolo Caimi ◽

Faiz Anwer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Level 2

Background: High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard treatment both as consolidation after induction chemotherapy and as second-line therapy depending on the histologic subtype of NHL. BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) is a commonly used conditioning regimen for NHL but often fails to produce durable remission, likely due to inherent chemoresistance. Many B-cell NHL subtypes including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and double-hit lymphoma are resistant to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis by overexpression of Bcl-2. Venetoclax is an orally administered selective Bcl-2 inhibitor with significant single agent activity in CLL and mantle cell lymphoma. In addition, the efficacy of venetoclax is potentiated by combination with rituximab [Seymour 2018, Kater 2018] and multiple lines of preclinical data show synergistic efficacy with a range of both novel and conventional antineoplastic agents [Johnson-Farley 2015, Li 2015]. Study Design and Methods: This is a single arm, open-label, dose-escalation phase I trial to evaluate the safety of venetoclax in combination with BEAM (V-BEAM) conditioning chemotherapy. Key inclusion criteria include patients with pathologically confirmed NHL, regardless of specific histology, who have received one prior systemic therapy and are eligible for and proceeding with HDCT followed by ASCT. The trial employs a standard 3+3 cohort-based dose escalation design of venetoclax (800 mg daily days -7 through -6 on dose level 1, 800 mg daily days -7 through -5 on dose level 2, 800 mg daily days -7 through -4 on dose level 3, 800 mg daily days -7 through -3 on dose level 4, and 800 mg daily days -7 through -2 on dose level 5) with standard doses of BEAM followed by ASCT. The primary objectives are to assess safety, describe dose-limiting toxicities, engraftment of stem cells and to identify the recommended phase II dose. Secondary objectives include evaluation of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to historical controls treated with BEAM as part of ASCT. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment will be estimated with cumulative incidence and compared to controls with Gray test. OS and PFS will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier and compared to controls with the log-rank test. As of 8/1/2019, the first dosing cohort of 3 patients have been enrolled and successfully completed study treatment. There are 3 patients in screening to be enrolled in dose level 2. Additional accrual will be presented at the time of the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03713580. Disclosures Anwer: Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; In-Cyte: Speakers Bureau. Gerds:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Imago Biosciences: Research Funding. Majhail:Nkarta: Consultancy; Atara Bio: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Anthem, Inc.: Consultancy. Hill:TG therapeutics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celegene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Our trial in progress is investigating the use of venetoclax in combination with BEAM conditioning chemotherapy prior to autologous stem cell transplantation. Venetoclax is not currently approved in this setting.

Download Full-text

Clinical Significance of Clonal Hematopoiesis in the Setting of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150102 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 655-655

Author(s):

Sharon Ben Barouch ◽

Tracy Lackraj ◽

Jessie Medeiros ◽

Mehran Bakhtiari ◽

Jesse Joynt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Increased Risk

Abstract Introduction : Peripheral blood samples of healthy individuals may harbour detectable mutations in genes recurrently mutated in myeloid malignancies, a situation referred to as clonal hematopoiesis (CH). Risk factors for CH include increasing age as well as previous exposure to cytotoxic therapy. CH has been associated with an increased risk of overall mortality, including in the setting of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Gibson et al, JCO, 2017). The excess mortality is largely driven by cardio-vascular disease, but may also be additionally attributable to an increased risk of myeloid malignancies that arise through the selection of CH subclones. Herein, we aimed to investigate the prognostic implications of CH after ASCT in an independent and diversified, large cohort of lymphoma patients using ultra-deep, highly sensitive error-correction sequencing. Methods : DNA was obtained from 420 residual apheresis products obtained from patients who had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation for lymphoma at the Princess Margaret Cancer Center between 2002 and 2018. Target DNA sequences corresponding to regions recurrently mutated in myeloid neoplasms (affecting n = 36 genes) were captured using single molecule molecular inversion probes (smMIPs) that incorporate molecular tagging. Single nucleotide variants and short insertions and deletions were identified using SmMIP-tools (Medeiros et al, bioRxiv, 2021), which implements a series of steps including probabilistic modeling of allele-specific error rates and generation of consensus sequences to suppress next-generation sequencing-associated errors. Given the high sensitivity and precision of our method, we did not prespecify a variant allele fraction cut-off. Results : All patients had relapsed/refractory lymphoma, except for 98 (23.3%) mantle cell lymphoma patients and one patient with extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma where ASCT was part of frontline management. The most common conditioning regimens were high-dose melphalan and etoposide (77.5%) and high-dose melphalan and Ara-C (16.4%). We identified 275 high-confidence mutations in 181 out of 420 patients (43.1%), with 64 of these 181 patient samples (35.4%) having more than one mutation. The median age was higher in patients with CH than in patients without (55 years vs. 51, P = 0.002). The most frequently mutated gene were PPM1D (11.9%), followed by TET2 (11.4%), DNMT3A (8.8%), ASXL1 (5.2%) and TP53 (4.5%). The lymphoma subtype with the highest prevalence of CH was T-cell lymphoma (CH found in 72.2% of cases), followed by transformed indolent lymphoma (51.4%), mantle cell lymphoma (47.5%), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (40.4%) and Hodgkin lymphoma (33.3%). While there was no difference in the number of CD34+ cells infused for patients with and without CH, the median time to neutrophil engraftment and the median time to platelet engraftment were significantly longer in patients with CH (11 days vs. 10 days, P = 0.025; and 14 days vs. 13 days, P < 0.001, respectively). The median follow-up of living patients was 4.2 years. Patients with CH had inferior 5-year OS from the time of first relapse (38.9% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.037) and from the time of ASCT (51.2% vs. 59.1%, P = 0.017, see figure). Five-year OS from ASCT was 47.5% vs. 53.7% in patients with 1 mutation and > 1 mutation, respectively, compared to 59.1% in patients without CH (P = 0.005). The presence of CH did not have an impact on the risk of post-ASCT relapse. In multivariate Cox regression analysis in which CH and age (as a continuous variable) were included, CH remained significantly associated with adverse OS post-ASCT (HR 1.39, 95% 1.02-1.91, P = 0.038). Only seven patients out of 420 (1.7%) developed a therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (TMN). The cumulative incidence of TMN was not significantly increased in patients with CH (10-year cumulative incidence 3.3% vs. 3.0% in those without CH, P = 0.433). Conclusions : Our results show that CH was associated with delayed neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Moreover, CH conferred an increased risk of death after ASCT that was not explained by lymphoma relapse. The risk of TMN was low in our cohort and CH was not a risk factor for TMN, an observation that is distinct from prior observations (e.g. Gibson et al, JCO, 2017 and Husby et al, Leukemia, 2020). Our results raise the possibility that the risk of TMN may be modulated by factors other than CH. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Minden: Astellas: Consultancy. Kuruvilla: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Antengene: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Pfizer: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Medison Ventures: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Crump: Roche: Research Funding; Epizyme: Research Funding; Kyte/Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Prica: Kite Gilead: Honoraria; Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria. Chen: Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astrazeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy. Kridel: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-116496 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2149-2149

Author(s):

Romil Patel ◽

Neeraj Y Saini ◽

Ankur Varma ◽

Omar Hasan ◽

Qaiser Bashir ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Remission ◽

Relapsed Disease

Abstract Introduction: The role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in the management of patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM), a rare, indolent lymphoma, has not been established. We had previously published our experience with auto-HCT in a small cohort of WM patients1. Here, we present an updated analysis of auto-HCT with a larger cohort of WM patients. Methods and study population: The study cohort was comprised of 29 patients who underwent high-dose chemotherapy and auto-HCT at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create survival curves. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration from date of transplant to death or last date of follow-up in living patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the duration from date of transplant to either progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first. Results: Median age at auto-HCT was 60 (range, 43-75 years). Eight patients (28%) had concurrent light chain amyloidosis (AL). Of the five patients who had MYD88 testing completed, 3 were positive for the MYD88 mutation. Additionally, of these 3 patients, 2 were also positive for CXCR4 mutation. Patients received a median of 2 lines (range 1-6) of therapy prior to auto-HCT; 3(10%) patients had primary refractory disease, 8(28%) were in first remission, and 18 (62%) had relapsed disease. Median time from transplant to last follow-up for the surviving patients was 5.3 years. Preparative regimens received by the patients were: Melphalan (n=20), BEAM-R (n=2), Busulfan/Melphalan (n=1), Cyclophosphomaide/Etoposide/total body irradiation (n=1), Thiotepa/Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (n=1), and Carmustine/Thiotepa (n=1). Three patients further went on to receive allogeneic transplant either after relapse from auto-HCT or due to disease transformation to aggressive lymphoma. Twenty-eight patients achieved engraftment with a median time to neutrophil engraftment of 11 days (range, 10-15 days). One patient suffered primary graft failure due to progression of disease and died 84 days after transplant. Non-relapse mortality was 3.4% at 1 year. All patients were eligible for response evaluation. The median OS from diagnosis was 12.2 years. Overall response rate was 96%: complete response (n=8, 27.6%), very good partial response (n=5, 17.3%), partial response (n=15, 51.7%), and progressive disease (n=1, 3.4%). PFS and OS at 5 years were 43.3% and 62.9%, respectively. Median PFS and OS from auto-HCT were 4.1 and 7.3 years (Fig. 1A). The median OS from auto-HCT in first remission + primary refractory and relapsed disease was 8.2 years and 4.1 years, respectively.16 patients were alive at the time of censoring while 13 patients had died. Causes of death include relapsed disease (n=6), secondary malignancy (n=2), infection (n=1), chronic graft-versus-host disease (n=1), and unknown (n=3). 8 patients (28%) were positive for concurrent AL amyloidosis. The sites of amyloid involvement were kidneys (n=2), lungs (n=1), bone marrow (n=1), heart(n=1), lymph nodes(n=1), gastrointestinal tract (n=1) and subcutaneous fat aspirate(n=5). The median overall survival for patients with amyloid involvement (n=8) was 12 years. On univariate analyses, the number of chemotherapy regimens prior to transplant (≤ 2 vs >2 lines) was the strongest predictor of overall survival (p=0.03, HR 0.3, CI: 0.09-0.9, log-rank) and PFS (p=0.001, HR 0.24, CI: 0.07-0.85, log-rank). The median PFS in patients with ≤ 2 lines and > 2 lines of therapy was 71 months versus 19 months, respectively (Fig. 1B). Conclusion: Auto-HCT is safe and feasible in selected patients with WM, with a high response rate and durable remission even in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. References: Krina Patel et.al. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. Blood 2012 120:4533; Disclosures Thomas: Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb Inc.: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Array Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Research Funding. Lee:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai Biopharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Orlowski:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; BioTheryX: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Champlin:Otsuka: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Patel:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Stem Cell Transplantation Can Provide Durable Disease Control in Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasia (BPDC): A Retrospective Study From the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3077.3077 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3077-3077

Author(s):

Sascha Dietrich ◽

Damien Roos-Weil ◽

Ariane Boumendil ◽

Emanuelle Polge ◽

Jian-Jian Luan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 3077 Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDC), formerly known as blastic NK cell lymphoma, is a rare hematopoietic malignancy preferentially involving the skin, bone marrow and lymph nodes. The overall prognosis of BPDC is dismal. Most patients show an initial response to acute leukemia-like chemotherapy, but relapses with subsequent drug resistance occur in virtually all patients resulting in a median overall survival of only 9–13 months. However, anecdotal long-term remissions have been reported in young patients who received early myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). We therefore performed a retrospective analysis of patients identified in the EBMT registry in order to evaluate the outcome of autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) or alloSCT for BPDC. Eligible were all patients who had been registered with a diagnosis of BPDC or Blastic NK cell lymphoma and had received autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) or alloSCT in 2000–2009. Centres were contacted to provide a written histopathology and immunophenotyping report and information about treatment and follow-up details. Patients who did not have a diagnostic score ≥ 2 as proposed by Garnache-Ottou et al. (BJH 2009) were excluded. RESULTS: Overall, 139 patients could be identified in the database who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (alloSCT 100, autoSCT 39). Of 74 patients for whom the requested additional information could be obtained, central review confirmed the diagnosis of BPDC in 39 patients (34 alloSCT, 5 autoSCT). The 34 patients who had undergone alloSCT had a median age of 41 years (range: 10–70 years), were transplanted from a related (n=11) or unrelated donor (n=23); received peripheral blood stem cells (n=9), bone marrow stem cells (n=19) or cord blood (n=6); and had been treated with a reduced intensity conditioning regimen (RIC, n=9) or myeloablative conditioning (MAC, n=25). Nineteen of 34 patients were transplanted in CR1. After a median follow up time of 28 months (range: 4–77+ months), 11 patients relapsed (median time to relapse: 8 months, range: 2–27 months) of whom 8 died due to disease progression. 9 patients died in the absence of relapse. No relapse occurred later than 27 months after transplant. Median disease free survival (DFS) was 15 months (range: 4–77+ months) and median overall survival (OS) was 22 months (range: 8–77+ months; Figure 1a). However, long-term remissions of up to 77 months after alloSCT could be observed. Patients allografted in CR1 tended to have a superior DFS (p=0.119) and OS (p=0.057; Figure 1b). MAC was associated with a better OS (p=0.001) which was attributable to the significantly higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate of patients after RIC (p=0.014), who had been significantly older (age RIC: 56 years, age MAC: 36 years, p=0.0014). The relapse rate was not different in patients after RIC and MAC, respectively. However, there was no survivor after RIC. Median age in the autoSCT group was 47 years (range: 14–62 years). Three of 5 patients were transplanted in CR1 of whom 1 patient relapsed after 8 months, 1 patient experienced treatment related mortality and 1 patient remained in CR for 28 months. The 2 remaining patients had more advanced disease at autoSCT and relapsed 4 and 8 months thereafter. CONCLUSION: AlloSCT is effective in BPDC and might provide curative potential in this otherwise incurable disease, especially when performed in CR1. However, it remains to be shown by prospective studies if the potential benefit of alloSCT in BPDC is largely due to conditioning intensity, or if there is a relevant contribution of graft-versus-leukemia activity. Disclosures: Tilly: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

The Effect of JAK 1/2 Inhibitors on Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112769 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5784-5784

Author(s):

Guido Lancman ◽

Kathleen Miller ◽

Shuli Li ◽

Vincent T. Ho ◽

Amir T. Fathi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Donor Type

Abstract Introduction: Ruxolitinib was the first JAK 1/2 inhibitor (JAKi) approved for myelofibrosis (MF), with several other JAKi in development. Ruxolitinib was approved on the basis of reducing splenomegaly and improving constitutional symptoms, but its effect on subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is not well understood. Retrospective studies to date have reported mixed outcomes after SCT for MF patients with previous exposure to JAKi. In this multicenter retrospective study, we report on outcomes of patients with MF treated with SCT at our institutions. Methods: We analyzed outcomes for 184 consecutive patients at three institutions who underwent SCT for primary or secondary MF. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS), all measured from the time of SCT. Cox proportional hazard regressions were fit to estimate the association between the use of JAK 1/2 inhibitors prior to SCT and OS, PFS, and GRFS, adjusting for donor type and DIPSS-plus status. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 72 patients received a JAKi prior to SCT, while 112 did not. Patients in these two groups were well-matched with respect to age, sex, DIPSS plus score, conditioning, and donor type (Table 1). Median follow-up was 31.2 months (range: 0.8-146.3 months). In univariate analysis, there was no difference in OS (JAKi: 4-yr OS 56.7% [95% CI 40.9-69.8%] vs. no JAKi: 43.6% [95% CI 32.9-53.9%], p=0.49), PFS (JAKi: 4 yr PFS 54.1% [95% CI 40.8-65.7%] vs. no JAKi: 43.9% [95% CI 33.4-53.9%], p=0.77), or GRFS (JAKi: 8-month GRFS 56.6% [95% CI 44.1-67.4%] vs. no JAKi: 50.4% [95% CI 40.4-59.5%], p=0.62) in the overall population; there was similarly no difference when comparing only intermediate-risk or only high-risk patients. In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in these outcomes for patients based on previous JAKi exposure when accounting for DIPSS plus score and donor type (related vs unrelated). Rates of acute GVHD were similar between the two groups (JAKi: 53.5% vs. no JAKi: 55.0%, p=0.88), including grade 3 or 4 acute GVHD (JAKi: 16.9% vs no JAKi: 19.8%, p=0.70). Conclusions: Our data suggest that there is no statistically significant difference in OS, PFS, GRFS, or rates of acute GVHD after SCT for MF patients based on previous JAKi treatment. This was true overall and after adjusting for DIPSS plus risk score or donor type. Given the retrospective design of our study, we were not able to assess prior response to JAKi or splenomegaly at SCT, which may influence outcomes. Given mixed results in the literature to date, we eagerly await the results of ongoing phase 2 trials of JAKi prior to SCT for MF. Disclosures Ho: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Fathi:Astellas: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Chen:Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy; REGiMMUNE: Consultancy. Hoffman:Formation Biologics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Merus: Research Funding; Summer Road: Research Funding. Mascarenhas:Novartis: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Feasibility and Outcomes of T-Cell Depleted Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory AML and High Risk MDS

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126211 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3324-3324

Author(s):

Satyajit Kosuri ◽

Sang Mee Lee ◽

Hongtao Liu ◽

Mylove Mortel ◽

Lucy A Godley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

T Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees

Background: Survival in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is dismal. Treatment options are limited; however, a proportion of these individuals can be rescued by allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Historically, allo-SCT, especially for R/R myeloid diseases, has used myeloablative regimens and no T-cell depletion (TCD) to maximize graft-versus-leukemia effect, often restricting this approach to younger and fit pts with matched donors. The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes of in vivo T-cell depleted stem cell transplantation (TCD-SCT) in a high-risk AML and MDS population. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 141 patients with R/R AML (n=108)/high risk MDS (RAEB or CMML, n=33) who received TCD-SCT at our center from 2002-2015. Median age was 55 years (18-71) with 37 (26%) pts older than 60. Patients underwent in vivo TCD with alemtuzumab or ATG and 117 (88%) received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). Alemtuzumab was generally given as 100 mg total divided over 5 days whereas rabbit ATG dosing included days -1, - 3, -5 (+/- on day -7). Alemtuzumab usually partnered with matched related (n=65; 46%) or unrelated (n=53; 38%) peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts whereas ATG mostly was a component of umbilical cord grafts combined with a CD34 selected haploidentical donor (haplo-cord) (n=23; 16%). Prognostic factors such as age, HCT-CI, CIBMTR score (Duval 2010), revised disease risk index (R-DRI), donor type and pre-transplant disease status were analyzed. Multivariate cox regression models were considered from forward selection for factors with a p value <0.1 in univariate analysis. Results: Table 1 summarizes baseline characteristics. Among the 141 R/R AML or high risk MDS pts, AML predominated (77%). Sixty six (47%) pts had primary induction failure (PIF), 42 (37%) had relapse and 33 (23%) had high risk MDS. Eighty three pts (59%) had peripheral blasts at time of TCD-SCT. Cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse for all pts was 53% and non-relapse mortality was 28% at 2 yrs. Two and 5 yr PFS rates for the group were 19% and 11%, respectively. Two and 5 yr OS rates for the group were 30% and 18%, respectively. Figure 1 shows OS by disease type. Day 100 mortality was 18%. Twenty one percent developed Grade 2-4 acute GVHD (aGVHD) (6% Grade 3-4), and only 5% developed chronic GVHD (cGVHD) requiring therapy. Figure 2 shows CI of cGVHD amongst disease types. Differences in 2yr survival outcomes were not significant among prognostic factors. Specifically, age 60+ vs younger was not prognostic (PFS 24% vs 17% p=0.4, OS 29% vs 29% p=0.7). Likewise, haplo-cord did not differ relative to matched donors in outcomes (PFS 18% vs 26% p=0.2, OS 35% vs 29% p=0.5). Conclusions: Although novel therapeutic approaches are emerging for R/R AML and high risk MDS, allo-SCT remains an established option for long-term disease control. In our analysis, outcomes after in vivo TCD-SCT in R/R AML and high-risk MDS pts treated with RIC mirror published historical results (Duval 2010, Schlenk 2010) but with low rates of cGVHD. The lack of significant difference in survival outcomes amongst age groups and donor sources suggests RIC with in vivo TCD can also be utilized as a platform in older individuals and those with alternative donors. With high relapse rates in this population, better pre-transplant disease reduction, minimal residual disease monitoring and post-transplant maintenance will be critical to increase long-term cures. Disclosures Liu: Agios: Honoraria; Arog: Other: PI of clinical trial; BMS: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: PI of clinical trial. Larson:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Contracts for clinical trials; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Odenike:Oncotherapy: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; CTI/Baxalta: Research Funding. Stock:Kite, a Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Honoraria. Kline:Merck: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Riedell:Bayer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Van Besien:Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Bishop:Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Artz:Miltenyi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text