scholarly journals Final Results of a Phase 1 Study of AntiCD19 CAR-T Cells with TNFRSF19 Transmembrane Domain

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3833-3833
Author(s):  
Paolo F. Caimi ◽  
Armin Ghobadi ◽  
Jane Reese ◽  
Benjamin Tomlinson ◽  
Folashade Otegbeye ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: AntiCD19 CAR-T cells are effective against chemorefractory B cell lymphoma. Patients (pts) with rapidly progressive disease and urgent need for therapy have very poor prognosis and may not be able to receive CAR-T cells in time. Decreasing the apheresis to infusion time can make CAR-T cells rapidly available. We conducted a dual-center phase I trial using on-site manufacture of CAR-T cells for treatment of relapsed and refractory (r/r) B cell lymphoma. Methods: Adult pts with r/r CD19+ B cell lymphomas who failed ≥ 2 lines of therapy were enrolled. Autologous T cells were transduced with a lentiviral vector (Lentigen Technology, Inc, LTG1563) encoding an antiCD19 binding motif, CD8 linker, TNFRS19 transmembrane region, and 4-lBB/CD3z intracellular signaling domains. GMP-compliant manufacture was done using CliniMACS Prodigy in a 12-day culture, subsequently shortened to 8 days. Dose escalation was done using 3+3 design. Lymphodepletion included cyclophosphamide (60mg/kg x 1) and fludarabine (25mg/m2/d x 3). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded using the Lee and CARTOX criteria, respectively. CAR-T persistence was measured with qPCR and flow cytometry. Plasma cytokine concentrations were measured using electrochemiluminescence (MesoScale Diagnostics, Inc). Results: Thirty-one pts were enrolled and treated. Baseline patient and disease characteristics are listed in table 1. Twenty-nine (94%) pts were refractory to the prior line of therapy and 21 (68%) had symptomatic disease at the time of lymphocyte collection. CAR-T cell product manufacture was successful in all pts. Median transduction rate was 45% [range 15-66], median culture expansion was 36-fold [range 3-79]. CAR-T cell doses were 0.5 x 10 6/kg (n = 4), 1 x 10 6/kg (n = 16), and 2 x 10 6/kg (n = 11). Median time from apheresis to lymphodepletion was 7 days (range 2 - 15) and median time from apheresis to CAR-T cell infusion time was 13 days (range 9 - 20). Twenty-eight pts were infused fresh product. Seventeen pts (55%) experienced CRS. Grade 1-2 CRS was observed in 15 pts (48%), grade ≥ 3 was observed in 3 pts (10%). One patient had grade 4 CRS that was later complicated by hemophagocytic syndrome and died on day 21; a second patient had grade 5 CRS in the context of bulky disease and died on day 8. Ten pts (32%) had ICANS and 4 pts had grade 3-4 ICANS. Treatment for CRS / ICANS included tocilizumab (n = 12), siltuximab (n = 4), anakinra (n = 3) and corticosteroids (n = 10). The most common all grade non - hematologic toxicity was fatigue, observed in 19 pts, all grade 1. Hematologic toxicity was common, with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia observed in all subjects. Twenty-five (81%) presented disease response and twenty-two pts (71%) achieved complete response (CR). There were no statistically significant differences in the overall and complete response rates between dose levels. After a median follow up of 18 months (range 1 - 32), 5 pts relapsed, and 7 pts have died. Causes of death include progressive disease (n=5), CRS (n=1) and CRS/HLH (n=1). Two-year estimates of PFS and OS for the whole cohort were 67% (95%CI 52-88%) and 75% (95%CI 60-93%)(fig1), respectively. Two-year estimates for patients achieving disease response (CR or PR) were 82% (95%CI 67-99%) and 90% (95%CI 78-100%), respectively. The median duration of response has not been reached (95% CI 74-100). Among pts achieving CR, 94% (95% CI 61-100%) had sustained remission at 12 months. Median time to peak CAR-T expansion, measured by PCR, was 14 days (IQR 14-19), without differences between dose levels, culture duration or fresh vs. cryopreserved infusion. All evaluable subjects had persistent CAR-Ts on PCR measurements done on days 30, 60 and 90. CAR-T cell dose did not have an impact in the time to peak in vivo CAR-T cell expansion or in the rate of CAR-T cell persistence (fig 2). Cytokine measurements have been conducted in 19 pts, with area under the curve (AUC) analyses showing pts with CRS had higher plasma concentrations of multiple cytokines (fig 3). Patients achieving CR had higher plasma concentrations of MIP3B. Conclusions: Second generation antiCD19 CAR-T cells with TNFRS19 transmembrane domain have potent clinical activity. On-site manufacture was successful in all pts. This strategy, in combination with fresh product infusion, can make CAR-T cell therapy rapidly available for pts with high-risk r/r B cell lymphoma. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Caimi: Amgen Therapeutics.: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; XaTek: Patents & Royalties: Royalties from patents (wife); Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; ADC Theraputics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy. Ghobadi: Wugen: Consultancy; Atara: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Schneider: Lentigen Technology: Current Employment. Boughan: Beigene: Speakers Bureau. Metheny: Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacosmos: Honoraria. Krueger: Lentigen: Current Employment. Kadan: Lentigen: Current Employment. Orentas: Lentigen: Patents & Royalties. Dropulic: Lentigen: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Patents & Royalties. de Lima: Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: AntiCD19 CAR-T cells with TNFRSF19 transmembrane domain for treatment of relapsed and refractory B cell lymphomas.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1680-1680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre V. Hirayama ◽  
Jordan Gauthier ◽  
Kevin A. Hay ◽  
Alyssa Sheih ◽  
Sindhu Cherian ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Autologous T cells engineered to express a CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) have shown high overall response rates (ORR) in otherwise treatment-refractory CD19+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); however, not all patients (pts) achieve complete remission (CR). PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and/or other tissues could impair the function of PD-1+ CAR-T cells and the efficacy of CD19 CAR-T cell immunotherapy. PD-1 pathway blockade may enhance the function and antitumor activity of CD19 CAR-T cells. Here we report preliminary data from a phase 1 dose-finding study (NCT02706405) of the safety and feasibility of combination therapy with JCAR014 CD19-specific 4-1BB-costimulated CAR-T cells and escalating doses of durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, in adults with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell NHL. Methods Pts are treated in one of two groups. All pts receive lymphodepletion chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine followed by infusion of JCAR014. Pts in group 1 receive the first infusion of durvalumab (225 mg, 750 mg, or 1500 mg) 21-28 days after treatment with JCAR014. Pts in group 2 receive the first dose of durvalumab (7.5 mg, 22.5 mg, 75 mg, 225 mg, 750 mg, or 1500 mg) 1 day prior to JCAR014 infusion. Up to 10 doses of durvalumab are administered after JCAR014 at the highest identified safe dose at 4-week intervals until toxicity or disease progression. We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the combination therapy and the pharmacokinetic profile of JCAR014 after infusion. Adverse events were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03, with the exception of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which was graded according to consensus criteria (Lee, Blood 2014). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed approximately 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 months after JCAR014 infusion and the best anti-tumor response was reported according to the Lugano criteria (Cheson, JCO 2014). Results Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Fifteen pts have been treated, including 6 in group 1 who received post-JCAR014 durvalumab doses of 225 mg (n = 3) and 750 mg (n = 3), and 9 in group 2 who received pre-JCAR014 durvalumab doses of 7.5 mg (n = 1), 22.5 mg (n = 1), 75 mg (n = 3), or 225 mg (n = 4). Durvalumab dose escalation is ongoing. JCAR014 manufacturing was successful for all pts. All pts received 2 x 106 JCAR014 CAR-T cells/kg, except the first 2 pts treated on the study who received 7 x 105 CAR-T cells/kg. Of the 13 pts who received JCAR014 at 2 x 106 CAR-T cells/kg, 5 pts (38%) developed CRS (2 grade 1, 2 grade 2, and 1 grade 4) and one (8%) developed grade 1 neurotoxicity. CRS and/or neurotoxicity occurred within 4 weeks of JCAR014 infusion, and were not observed when durvalumab was administered after JCAR014. With the exception of B cell aplasia, no autoimmune adverse events were observed. Twelve of 13 pts who received 2 x 106 CAR-T cells/kg were evaluable for response. One patient, who had grade 4 CRS and biopsy evidence of extensive CAR-T cell infiltration into persistent sites of disease, elected to receive hospice care and died on day 32 after JCAR014 infusion without full response evaluation. The overall response rate was 50% (5 CR, 42%; 1 PR, 8%). Of the 5 pts who achieved CR, 3 were in CR at the first restaging after JCAR014 and 2 subsequently converted to CR after the first post-JCAR014 durvalumab infusion. Only one patient who achieved CR has relapsed (median follow-up 10.6 months, range 3.7-11.8). Continued stable disease or evidence of regression was seen in 4 of 6 (67%) initially non-responding pts who continued durvalumab therapy (median 5 doses, range 1-6). CAR-T cell counts expanded in the peripheral blood within 14 days of JCAR014 infusion in all pts. Higher peak and day 28 CAR-T cell copy numbers in blood by qPCR were observed in responding pts. CAR-T cells were detected for a median of 5.1 months (range, 1.7 to 9.1 months) in responding pts. In vivo re-accumulation of CAR-T cells after the first post-JCAR014 durvalumab dose was observed in the blood of two patients in group 2. Conclusion The combination of JCAR014 with durvalumab for the treatment of adult pts with aggressive B-cell NHL appears safe; however, dose escalation is ongoing. Complete responses were observed both at initial restaging after JCAR014 infusion, and also subsequently in pts continuing durvalumab therapy after initially failing to achieve CR. Disclosures Hirayama: DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Hay:DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Till:Mustang Bio: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kiem:Homology Medicine: Consultancy; Magenta: Consultancy; Rocket Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Shadman:Verastem: Consultancy; Beigene: Research Funding; Mustang Biopharma: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Cassaday:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Spouse Employment, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Acharya:Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Teva: Honoraria. Riddell:Cell Medica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; NOHLA: Consultancy. Maloney:Roche/Genentech: Honoraria; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen Scientific Affairs: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Turtle:Precision Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Nektar Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eureka Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics / Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Caribou Biosciences: Consultancy; Aptevo: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 678-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Hsuan Chen ◽  
Mikel Lipschitz ◽  
Kyle Wright ◽  
Philippe Armand ◽  
Caron A. Jacobson ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Axicabtagene ciloleucel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy that shows efficacy in patients with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and transformed follicular lymphoma after failure of conventional therapy. However, the exact mechanism of anti-tumor immunity is poorly understood, in part due to the dearth of data on the events in the tumor micro-environment (TME) that occur upon exposure to CAR-T cells. We sought to quantify and characterize both CAR-T cells and non-CAR T cells within the TME of DLBCL using tissue biopsy samples collected in the ZUMA-1 multicenter trial of CAR-T cell therapy for patients with refractory DLBCL. METHODS: Tumor samples obtained from patients 5-30 days (median 10 days) after CAR-T infusion ("CAR-treated", n=14) and randomly-selected untreated ("untreated ", n=15) archival DLBCL tissue samples were analyzed by multiplex immunofluorescence using formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue sections, with successive labeling by the primary antibodies KIP-1 and/or KIP-3 (recognizing separate CD19 CAR epitopes), PAX5, PD-1, CD4, and CD8, followed by secondary amplification and tyramide-conjugated fluorophores. For each case, at least 3 representative 20x fields of view were selected and imaged using a multispectral imaging platform. Two specific image analysis algorithms were designed to accurately identify CD4 and CD8 T cells and PAX5+ DLBCL cells simultaneously, then to threshold PD-1 and KIP-1/-3 by relative fluorescent units (RFU) in each phenotype. RESULTS: We identified CAR T-cells within the fixed biopsy samples of CAR-treated DLBCLs by immunostaining with CAR T-cell specific antibody KIP-1; at the timepoints analyzed, CAR T-cells comprised only a small minority of total T- cells (<2%) and included CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. Immunostaining with a second antibody, KIP-3, validated the presence of CAR T-cells in these cases and confirmed the KIP-1 results. Expression of the T cell activation marker PD-1 was detected among majority of KIP-1+ cells. Further analysis that included KIP1-negative cells revealed that the percentage of CD8+ cells co-expressing PD-1 across all CD8+ cells was higher in the CAR-treated DLBCLs compared to the untreated DLBCLs (mean 50.1% vs 17.5%, p<0.0001 with unpaired t test ), indicating CD8 T cell activation within the tumor environment. In contrast, PD-1 positivity across CD4+ T cells were equivalent between the two groups (mean 21.8% vs 21.6%, ns with unpaired t test). The percentages of total, CD4+, and CD8+ T-cell populations in the TME were similar between the CAR-treated DLBCL and untreated biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: CD4+ and CD8+ CAR-T cells can be detected in CAR-treated DLBCL patient tissue biopsies by multiplex immunofluorescence. At the time points analyzed to date, CAR-T cells comprise only a small percentage of all T-cells (<2%) within the TME. However, the presence of gene marked T cells with downregulated CAR protein expression is also possible. The activation marker PD-1 is preferentially expressed by KIP-1-negative CD8+ T cells compared to CD4+ T cells in CAR-T treated DLBCLs relative to untreated DLBCLs. These data implicate preferential activation of CD8+ non-CAR "by-stander" T-cells in the post CAR-T TME, and the possible benefit of combining PD-1 blockade with CAR-T therapy in DLBCL. *PH.C and M.L share equal contribution. Disclosures Armand: Otsuka: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Infinity: Consultancy; Adaptive: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tensha: Research Funding. Roberts:KITE: Employment. Rossi:KITE: Employment. Bot:KITE: Employment. Go:KITE: Employment. Rodig:Merck: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; KITE: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
Julio C. Chavez ◽  
Frederick L. Locke ◽  
Ellen Napier ◽  
Carl Simon ◽  
Andrew Lewandowski ◽  
...  

Background: Tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, has demonstrated durable responses and a manageable safety profile in adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). It has previously been suggested that prior therapy with ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, may improve tisa-cel manufacturing, in vivo cellular kinetics, and antitumor efficacy (Fraietta et al. Blood. 2016). Moreover, since BTK signaling is involved in direct pro-inflammatory polarization of macrophages, as well as indirectly by T cells, it is hypothesized that ibrutinib may mitigate CAR-T cell-related toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological events (NE). We report the initial results from a Phase Ib, multicenter, open-label trial evaluating the safety and tolerability of tisa-cel in combination with ibrutinib in adult pts with r/r DLBCL. Methods: Adult pts with r/r DLBCL who received &gt;2 prior lines of systemic therapy, including pts who progressed after or were ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant, were enrolled. The study design has 2 nonrandomized arms. In Arm 1, pts received ibrutinib 560 mg/d for ~4 weeks prior to leukapheresis; in Arm 2, pts were exposed to ibrutinib after leukapheresis. In both arms, ibrutinib was continued throughout lymphodepleting chemotherapy, tisa-cel infusion, and post infusion for up to 24 months. Lymphodepleting chemotherapy, ending at least 2 days before tisa-cel infusion, was either fludarabine (25 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2) daily for 3 days or bendamustine (90 mg/m2) daily for 2 days. Pts received a single infusion of tisa-cel (target dose: 0.6-6.0×108 viable CAR+ T cells). Primary endpoints are incidence and severity of adverse events and ibrutinib dose interruptions/modifications. Secondary endpoints include best overall response (BOR) by Lugano criteria and cellular kinetics of tisa-cel. Results: As of June 9, 2020, 10 pts have been treated and observed through at least the Day 28 assessment: 4 in Arm 1 and 6 in Arm 2. Median age was 59 (range, 32-67) in Arm 1 and 64 (range, 58-76) in Arm 2. Median number of prior therapies was 3.5 (range, 2-5) in Arm 1 and 2 (range, 2-3) in Arm 2. Three of 10 pts (Arm 1, n=1; Arm 2, n=2) had an activated B-cell-like subtype of DLBCL. Six of 10 pts (Arm 1, n=1; Arm 2, n=5) had grade 1 CRS (by Lee scale) and 1 pt had NE (Arm 2, grade 1 by ASTCT criteria; Table). One pt in Arm 2 had grade 3 neutropenia lasting &gt;28 days post tisa-cel infusion. No other pts had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia lasting &gt;28 days. No major bleeding events were observed. Ibrutinib-related bradycardia and atrial fibrillation (both grade 2) were each observed in 1 pt in Arm 1; supraventricular tachycardia (grade 1) related to tisa-cel was observed in 1 pt in Arm 2. No pt required tocilizumab or ICU admission. As of data cutoff, BOR in Arm 1 was complete response (CR) in 2 pts and partial response (PR) in 2 pts, with no relapses. BOR in Arm 2 was CR in 2 pts, PR in 1 pt, and progressive disease in 3 pts (Table). CAR-T cell expansion in vivo by qPCR was in line with data from the pivotal JULIET trial, except for 1 pt in Arm 2 whose transgene levels were below the limit of quantification at all points in time and who progressed at Day 28. Median viability of the leukapheresis material was 96.80% (range, 88.8-97.3) in Arm 1 and 90.95% (range, 88.1-94.7) in Arm 2. A naïve/stem cell-like central memory phenotype (CD45RA+/CCR7+) was observed in 24.05% (median; range, 15.9-37.0) of CD8+ T cells in the leukapheresis material for Arm 1 and in 8.12% (median; range, 1.3-20.4) for Arm 2 (Fig.1A). Fig.1B shows total CAR+ manufactured cells in each arm. The median dose of the final product was 3.9×108 CAR+ T cells in Arm 1 (range, 3.4-4.6×108 CAR+ T cells; median viability 92.25%) and 1.7×108 CAR+ T cells in Arm 2 (range, 1.2-3.0×108 CAR+ T cells; median viability 85.8%; Fig.1C). IFNγ secretion of tisa-cel in vitro in response to CD19+ target cells was similar between the 2 arms, whereas median normalized IL-2 responses were 23.1 fg/CAR+ cell in Arm 1 (range, 16.7-43.8) and 1.1 fg/CAR+ cell in Arm 2 (range, 0-17.3). Conclusions: These results support the feasibility of administering ibrutinib to pts with DLBCL throughout tisa-cel therapy. When given before apheresis, ibrutinib may improve CAR-T cell manufacturing, although further studies are needed to confirm this finding. Disclosures Chavez: AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy; Epizyme: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Locke:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Calibr: Consultancy; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; GammaDelta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Cellular Biomedicine Group: Other: Consultancy with grant options; Allogene: Consultancy; Wugen: Consultancy. Simon:Novartis: Current Employment. Lewandowski:Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research: Current Employment. Awasthi:Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research: Current Employment. Engels:Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research: Current Employment. Georgala:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Current Employment. Bondanza:Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research: Current Employment. Schuster:AlloGene, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Juno/Celgene, Loxo Oncology, Nordic Nanovector, Novartis, Tessa Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis, Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3228-3228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Graham ◽  
Agnieszka Jozwik ◽  
Ruby Quartey-Papafio ◽  
Nikolaos Ioannou ◽  
Ana M Metelo ◽  
...  

Despite the success of autologous anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy in B-Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) and Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), treatment failures occur. One contributing factor may be the intrinsic T cell fitness of the CAR T cell product that is influenced by the underlying malignancy and prior treatments. With the advent of gene editing, 'off the shelf' non-HLA matched healthy donor (HD) CAR T cells are under investigation for the treatment of patients (pts) in clinical trials. UCART19 (S68587) is a first-in-class allogeneic CAR T cell product expressing a second generation anti-CD19 CAR with TALEN®-mediated gene knockouts of T cell receptor alpha chain (TRAC) and CD52 to prevent graft versus host disease and to render them resistant to anti-CD52 antibody used for lymphodepletion. Preliminary clinical trial data on the use of UCART19 in B-ALL was previously reported at ASH (Benjamin et al, 2018). The phenotypic and functional characteristics of CAR T cell products manufactured from B-ALL, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL) and DLBCL pts were compared to young adult healthy donor (HD) CAR T cell products. In addition, potential effects related to knocking out TRAC in HD TCR-CAR T cells were examined. Thawed PBMCs from B-ALL, CLL, DLBCL pts and HDs underwent T cell enrichment, activation with anti-CD3/CD28 beads and IL-2, followed by transduction with anti-CD19 4-1BB CD3ζ lentiviral CAR construct and expansion. HD TCR- CAR T cells were manufactured by electroporation of HD CAR T cells with mRNA coding for TRAC TALEN® and residual TCRαβ+cells were removed by magnetic bead selection. CAR expression levels, T cell subsets, and exhaustion markers were examined by flow cytometry. Expression of activation markers CD25 and CD69 was measured in response to co-culture with the CD19+cell line NALM-6. Cytotoxicity against NALM-6 and Raji was assessed and antigen-mediated proliferation measured over 14 days. HD CAR T cells (n=11) expanded significantly more during manufacture than CAR T cells derived from B-ALL (n=9), CLL (n=8) or DLBCL (n=8) pts. As expected, the electroporation step resulted in a transient decrease in viability which recovered over time in culture (n=10). Median CAR expression level was higher on CLL CAR T cell products compared to those from B-ALL pts and HDs, thought to be due to a higher CD4:CD8 ratio in some CLL products. As a consequence of TCR knockout, CD3 expression was lost on HD TCR- CAR T cells (n=10), apart from a small population of γδ CAR T cells. CLL and DLBCL CD8+CAR+cells expressed higher levels of PD1 than HD CD8+CAR+cells. DLBCL CD4+CAR+cells also expressed significantly higher levels of PD1 than HD or HD TCR-CD4+CAR+T cells. CAR+CD8+CD27+PD1- T cells have been previously described as a functionally important population that correlated with clinical outcome in pts who received CLL CAR T cells (Fraietta et al, 2018). We found HD (n=13) and HD TCR- (n=10) CAR T cells had significantly more CD8+CD27+PD1- CAR T cells compared to those derived from CLL (n=8) and DLBCL (n=6) pts, but similar levels to B-ALL pts (n=10). In the absence of CD19 antigen, DLBCL CAR+CD8+ T cells (n=6) had greater expression of CD25 and CD69. However, in response to stimulation with CD19+ NALM-6 cells, HD (n=12), HD TCR- (n=10) and B-ALL (n=10) CAR T cells had higher fold increase in CD69+ cells compared to DLBCL (n=6) CAR T cells. On paired analysis (n=6), no difference was seen in activation in response to CD19 antigen on HD compared to HD TCR- CAR T cells. All CAR T cell products demonstrated comparable cytotoxicity against NALM-6 and Raji cell lines in short term in vitro assays. However, long-term cytotoxicity will be evaluated in a murine model. We performed a detailed comparison of the phenotypic and functional characteristics of CAR T cells derived from pts with B-cell malignancies and HDs. DLBCL CAR T cells showed lower antigen specific activation but higher baseline activation which could lead to more differentiated exhausted T cells. CAR T cells derived from HDs show a higher proportion of the therapeutically relevant CAR+CD8+CD27+PD1- cells compared to patients with mature B cell malignancies (CLL and DLBCL), which is maintained after TRAC knockout. This suggests allogeneic CAR T cells, such as UCART19, may provide a more effective product for pts with T cell dysfunction. Disclosures Graham: Gillead: Other: Funding to attend educational meeting; Servier: Research Funding. Jozwik:Servier: Research Funding. Metelo:Pfizer: Research Funding; Allogene: Research Funding. Almena-Carrasco:Servier: Employment. Peranzoni:Servier: Employment. Ramsay:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Roche Glycart AG: Research Funding. Dupouy:Servier: Employment. Farzaneh:Autolus Ltd: Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Patten:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Benjamin:Amgen: Honoraria; Allogene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Servier: Research Funding; Eusapharm: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 19-20
Author(s):  
Sanaz Ghafouri ◽  
Christopher Walthers ◽  
Mobina Roshandell ◽  
Brenda Ji ◽  
Jacqueline Trent ◽  
...  

Background: Single-input anti-CD19 CAR T-cells have demonstrated clinical efficacy for relapsed or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Despite excellent response rates, over 50% of CD19 CAR T-cell recipients relapse. Preclinical data show engineering of bispecific anti-CD19/CD20 CAR T-cells via lentiviral transduction effectively targets tumor cells and overcomes antigen escape (Zah E et al., Cancer Immunol Res, 2016). Based on these promising preclinical results and the limitations of single-input anti-CD19 CARs, we investigated the bispecific anti-CD19/CD20 CAR naïve/memory T-cells in a phase I dose-escalation clinical trial for patients with R/R NHL/CLL (NCT04007029). Methods: This trial includes patients who have measurable disease after 2 lines of therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), and after 3 lines of therapy for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), CLL and small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL). Eligible participants received lymphodepleting chemotherapy with fludarabine 30 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 for three days, followed by anti-CD19/CD20 CAR T-cell infusion. The CAR T-cell infusion will be given with standard "3+3" dose escalation to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), with a dose range of 5 x 107 to 6 x 108 CAR-positive cells per patient. Results: To date, three patients received treatment on cohort 1 with 5 x 107 CD19/CD20 CAR T-cells for R/R MCL, FL and PMBCL, with an average age of 49.3 (range, 29-60) and a mean of 3.7 prior regimens (range, 3-4). All 3 patients' lymphomas were CD19+/CD20+ on tissue biopsy prior to CAR infusion and all 3 received bridging chemotherapy. The infusion was well tolerated and no major infusion reactions occurred. Peak expansion was noted on day 14. No dose limiting toxicities were identified. The maximum grade CRS was 1 and there was no ICANS. At the 6.0-month cutoff date, 2 of the 3 patients remain in ongoing complete remission. Unfortunately, one patient developed progressive disease 0.5 months after CAR infusion, yet remains alive after treatment with immunotherapy. Both of the responders continue to demonstrate ongoing CAR T-cell persistence and B-cell aplasia by 3.0 and 6.0-month follow up, respectively. Conclusions: Here we demonstrate impressive responses in 2 of 3 patients at the 5 x 107 CD19/CD20 CAR T-cell dosages. Bispecific CD19/CD20 CAR T-cell therapy appears to be safe and effective in patients with R/R NHL and CLL and obviates the challenges with the single antigen directed CARs by decreasing risk of target antigen loss and expression downregulation. A longer follow up period is required to determine the impact of modifying naïve/memory T cells and the durability of response. The trial continues to enroll patients and additional clinical and translational data are being collected on the initial patient cohort. Disclosures Timmerman: Corvus: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Marker Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bluebird Bio: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Immune Design: Honoraria; Celldex Therapeutics: Consultancy; Valor: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; BMS: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Genmab: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Chen:Kalthera Therapeutics: Other: Co-founder; Notch Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gritstone Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Larson:BMS, Bioline, Celgene, Juno, Janssen: Research Funding; TORL Biotherapeutics: Current equity holder in private company.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 776-776
Author(s):  
Claire Roddie ◽  
Maeve A O'Reilly ◽  
Maria A V Marzolini ◽  
Leigh Wood ◽  
Juliana Dias Alves Pinto ◽  
...  

Introduction: 2nd generation CD19 CAR T cells show unprecedented efficacy in B-ALL, but several challenges remain: (1) scaling manufacture to meet patient need and (2) feasibility of generating products from lymphopenic patients post allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT). To overcome these issues we propose: (1) use of the CliniMACS Prodigy (Miltenyi Biotec), a semi-automated cGMP platform that simplifies CAR T cell manufacture and (2) the use of matched donor T cells to overcome the challenge posed by patient lymphopenia, albeit this may come with a heightened risk of graft versus host disease (GvHD). CARD (NCT02893189) is a Phase I study of matched donor derived CD19 CAR T cells generated on the CliniMACS Prodigy in 14 adult patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B ALL following allo-SCT. We additionally explore the requirement for lymphodepletion (LD) in the allogeneic CAR T cell setting and report on the incidence of GvHD with this therapy. Methods: Manufacturing: CARD utilises non-mobilised matched donor leucapheresate to manufacture 2nd generation CD19CAR T cells using a closed CliniMACS® Prodigy/ TransACTTM process. Study design: Eligible subjects are aged 16-70y with r/r B ALL following allo SCT. Study endpoints include feasibility of CD19CAR T cell manufacture from allo-SCT donors on the CliniMACS Prodigy and assessments of engraftment and safety including GvHD. To assess the requirement for LD prior to CD19CAR T cells in lymphopenic post-allo-SCT patients, the study is split into Cohort 1 (no LD) and Cohort 2 (fludarabine (30 mg/m2 x3) and cyclophosphamide (300mg/m2 x3)). To mitigate for the potential GvHD risk, cell dosing on study mirrors conventional donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) schedules and is based on total CD3+ (not CAR T) cell numbers: Dose 1=1x106/kg CD3+ T cells; Dose 2= 3x106/kg CD3+ T cells; Dose 3= 1x107/kg CD3+ T cells. Results: As of 26 July 2019, 17 matched allo SCT donors were leukapheresed and 16 products were successfully manufactured and QP released. Patient demographics are as follows: (1) median patient age was 43y (range 19-64y); (2) 4/17 had prior blinatumomab and 5/17 prior inotuzumab ozogamicin; (3) 7/17 had myeloablative allo SCT and 10/17 reduced intensity allo SCT of which 6/17 were sibling donors and 12/17 were matched unrelated donors. No patients with haploidentical transplant were enrolled. To date, 12/16 patients have received at least 1 dose of CD19CAR T cells: 7/16 on Cohort 1 and 5/16 on Cohort 2 (2/16 are pending infusion on Cohort 2 and 2/16 died of fungal infection prior to infusion). Median follow-up for all 12 patients is 22.9 months (IQR 2.9-25.9; range 0.7 - 25.9). At the time of CAR T cell infusion, 7/12 patients were in morphological relapse with &gt;5% leukemic blasts. Despite this, CD19CAR T cells were administered safely: only 2/12 patients experienced Grade 3 CRS (UPenn criteria), both in Cohort 1, which fully resolved with Tocilizumab and corticosteroids. No patients experienced ≥Grade 3 neurotoxicity and importantly, no patients experienced clinically significant GvHD. In Cohort 1 (7 patients), median peak CAR expansion by flow was 87 CD19CAR/uL blood whereas in Cohort 2 (5 patients to date), median peak CAR expansion was 1309 CD19CAR/uL blood. This difference is likely to reflect the use of LD in Cohort 2. CAR T cell persistence by qPCR in Cohort 1 is short, with demonstrable CAR in only 2/7 treated patients at Month 2. Data for Cohort 2 is immature, but this will also be reported at the meeting in addition to potential mechanisms underlying the short persistence observed in Cohort 1. Of the 10 response evaluable patients (2/12 pending marrow assessment), 9/10 (90%) achieved flow/molecular MRD negative CR at 6 weeks. 2/9 responders experienced CD19 negative relapse (one at M3, one at M5) and 3/9 responders experienced CD19+ relapse (one at M3, one at M9, one at M12). 4/10 (40%) response evaluable patients remain on study and continue in flow/molecular MRD negative remission at a median follow up of 11.9 months (range 2.9-25.9). Conclusions: Donor-derived matched allogeneic CD19 CAR T cells are straightforward to manufacture using the CliniMACS Prodigy and deliver excellent early remission rates, with 90% MRD negative CR observed at Week 6 in the absence of severe CAR associated toxicity or GvHD. Peak CAR expansion appears to be compromised by the absence of LD and this may lead to a higher relapse rate. Updated results from Cohorts 1 and 2 will be presented. Disclosures Roddie: Novartis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. O'Reilly:Kite Gilead: Honoraria. Farzaneh:Autolus Ltd: Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Qasim:Autolus: Equity Ownership; Orchard Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; UCLB: Other: revenue share eligibility; Servier: Research Funding; Bellicum: Research Funding; CellMedica: Research Funding. Linch:Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pule:Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Peggs:Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 196-196
Author(s):  
Bishwas Shrestha ◽  
Kelly Walton ◽  
Jordan Reff ◽  
Elizabeth M. Sagatys ◽  
Nhan Tu ◽  
...  

Distinct from pharmacologic immunosuppression, we designed a programmed cytolytic effector T cell that prevents graft versus host disease (GVHD). CD83 is expressed on allo-activated conventional T cells (Tconv) and pro-inflammatory dendritic cells (DCs), which are implicated in GVHD pathogenesis. Therefore we developed a novel human CD83 targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell for GVHD prophylaxis. Here we demonstrate that human CD83 CAR T cells eradicate cell mediators of GVHD, significantly increase the ratio of regulatory T cells (Treg) to allo-activated Tconv, and provide lasting protection from xenogeneic GVHD. Further, we show human, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) expresses CD83 and can be targeted by CD83 CAR T cells. A 2nd generation CD83 CAR was generated with CD3ζ and 41BB costimulatory domain that was retrovirally transduced in human T cells to generate CD83 CAR T cells. The CD83 CAR construct exhibited a high degree of transduction efficiency of about 60%. The CD83 CAR T cells demonstrated robust IFN-γ and IL-2 production, killing, and proliferation when cultured with CD83+ target cells. To test whether human CD83 CAR T cells reduce alloreactivity in vitro, we investigated their suppressive function in allogeneic mixed leukocyte reactions (alloMLR). CD83 CAR T cells were added to 5-day alloMLRs consisting of autologous T cells and allogeneic monocyte-derived DCs at ratios ranging from 3:1 to 1:10. The CD83 CAR T cells potently reduced alloreactive T cell proliferation compared to mock transduced and CD19 CAR T cells. We identified that CD83 is differentially expressed on alloreactive Tconv, compared to Tregs. Moreover, the CD83 CAR T cell efficiently depletes CD83+ Tconv and proinflammatory DCs with 48 hours of engagement. To test the efficacy of human CD83 CAR T cells in vivo, we used an established xenogeneic GVHD model, where mice were inoculated with human PBMCs (25x106) and autologous CD83 CAR (1-10x106) or mock transduced T cells. The CD83 CAR T cells were well tolerated by the mice, and significantly improved survival compared to mock transduced T cells (Figure 1A). Mice treated with CD83 CAR T cells exhibited negligible GVHD target organ damage at day +21 (Figure 1B). Mice inoculated with CD83 CAR T cells demonstrated significantly fewer CD1c+, CD83+ DCs (1.7x106 v 6.2x105, P=0.002), CD4+, CD83+ T cells (4.8x103 v 5.8x102, P=0.005), and pathogenic Th1 cells (3.1x105 v 1.1x102, P=0.005) at day +21, compared to mice treated with mock transduced T cells. Moreover, the ratio of Treg to alloreactive Tconv (CD25+ non-Treg) was significantly increased among mice treated with CD83 CAR T cells (78 v 346, P=0.02), compared to mice injected with mock transduced T cells. Further, CD83 appears to be a promising candidate to target myeloid malignancies. We observed CD83 expression on malignant myeloid K562, Thp-1, U937, and MOLM-13 cells. Moreover, the CD83 CAR T cells effectively killed AML cell lines. Many AML antigens are expressed on progenitor stem cells. Thus, we evaluated for stem cell killing in human colony forming unit (CFU) assays, which demonstrated negligible on-target, off-tumor toxicity. Therefore, the human CD83 CAR T cell is an innovative cell-based approach to prevent GVHD, while providing direct anti-tumor activity against myeloid malignancies. Figure Disclosures Blazar: Kamon Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Five Prime Therapeutics Inc: Co-Founder, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BlueRock Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie Inc: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Childrens' Cancer Research Fund: Research Funding; KidsFirst Fund: Research Funding; Tmunity: Other: Co-Founder; Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.: Research Funding; RXi Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics and BlueRock Therapeuetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Davila:Atara: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Bellicum: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Anixa: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4810-4810
Author(s):  
Mark B. Geyer ◽  
Briana Cadzin ◽  
Elizabeth Halton ◽  
Peter Kane ◽  
Brigitte Senechal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Autologous CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T-cell therapy leads to complete responses (CR) in patients (pts) with (w/) relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL, &gt;80% CR rate) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, ~40-55% CR rate). However, following fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (Flu/Cy) conditioning and CAR T-cell therapy w/ a CD28 costimulatory domain (e.g. 19-28z CAR T-cells), rates of grade ≥3 ICANS and grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in pts w/ R/R DLBCL and morphologic R/R B-ALL exceed 30%. CRS and ICANS are associated w/ considerable morbidity, including increased length of hospitalization, and may be fatal. Host monocytes appear to be the major reservoir of cytokines driving CRS and ICANS post-CAR T-cell therapy (Giavradis et al. and Norelli et al., Nature Medicine, 2018). Circulating monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) may also blunt efficacy of 19-28z CAR T-cells in R/R DLBCL (Jain et al., Blood, 2021). The CD45-targeted antibody radioconjugate (ARC) 131-I apamistamab is being investigated at myeloablative doses as conditioning prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation in pts w/ R/R acute myeloid leukemia. However, even at low doses (4-20 mCi), transient lymphocyte and blast reduction are observed. Preclinical studies in C57BL/6 mice demonstrate low-dose anti CD45 radioimmunotherapy (100 microCi) transiently depletes &gt;90% lymphocytes, including CD4/CD8 T-cells, B-cells, NK cells, and T-regs, as well as splenocytes and MDSCs, w/ negligible effect on bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic stem cells (Dawicki et al., Oncotarget, 2020). We hypothesized a higher, yet nonmyeloablative dose of 131-I apamistamab may achieve more sustained, but reversible depletion of lymphocytes and other CD45 + immune cells, including monocytes thought to drive CRS/ICANS. We additionally hypothesized this approach (vs Flu/Cy) prior to CAR T-cell therapy would promote CAR T-cell expansion while reducing CSF levels of monocyte-derived cytokines (e.g. IL-1, IL-6, and IL-10), thus lowering the risk of severe ICANS (Fig 1A). Study design and methods: We are conducting a single-institution pilot study of 131-I apamistamab in lieu of Flu/Cy prior to 19-28z CAR T-cells in adults w/ R/R BALL or DLBCL (NCT04512716; Iomab-ACT); accrual is ongoing. Pts are eligible for leukapheresis if they are ≥18 years-old w/ R/R DLBCL (de novo or transformed) following ≥2 chemoimmunotherapy regimens w/ ≥1 FDG-avid measurable lesion or B-ALL following ≥1 line of multi-agent chemotherapy (R/R following induction/consolidation; prior 2 nd/3 rd gen TKI required for pts w/ Ph+ ALL) w/ ≥5% BM involvement and/or FDG-avid extramedullary disease, ECOG performance status 0-2, and w/ appropriate organ function. Active or prior CNS disease is not exclusionary. Pts previously treated w/ CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy are eligible as long as CD19 expression is retained. See Fig 1B/C: Post-leukapheresis, 19-28z CAR T-cells are manufactured as previously described (Park et al., NEJM, 2018). Bridging therapy is permitted at investigator discretion. Thyroid blocking is started ≥48h pre-ARC. 131-I apamistamab 75 mCi is administered 5-7 days pre-CAR T-cell infusion to achieve total absorbed marrow dose ~200 cGy w/ remaining absorbed dose &lt;25 cGy at time of T-cell infusion. 19-28z CAR T-cells are administered as a single infusion (1x10 6/kg, B-ALL pts; 2x10 6/kg, DLBCL pts). The primary objective is to determine safety/tolerability of 131-I apamistamab 75 mCi given prior to 19-28z CAR T-cells in pts w/ R/R B-ALL/DLBCL. Secondary objectives include determining incidence/severity of ICANS and CRS, anti-tumor efficacy, and 19-28z CAR T-cell expansion/persistence. Key exploratory objectives include describing the cellular microenvironment following ARC and 19-28z CAR T-cell infusion using spectral cytometry, as well as cytokine levels in peripheral blood and CRS. The trial utilizes a 3+3 design in a single cohort. If dose-limiting toxicity (severe infusion-related reactions, treatment-resistant severe CRS/ICANS, persistent regimen-related cytopenias, among others defined in protocol) is seen in 0-1 of the first 3 pts treated, then up to 6 total (up to 3 additional) pts will be treated. We have designed this study to provide preliminary data to support further investigation of CD45-targeted ARCs prior to adoptive cellular therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Geyer: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Geoghegan: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Reddy: Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Berger: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Ludwig: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Pandit-Taskar: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Clarity Pharma: Research Funding; Illumina: Consultancy, Honoraria; ImaginAb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ymabs: Research Funding; Progenics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Medimmune/Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding. Sauter: Genmab: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: 131-I apamistamab and 19-28z CAR T-cells are investigational agents in treatment of ALL and DLBCL


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2800-2800
Author(s):  
Michael Olson ◽  
Tim Luetkens ◽  
Fiorella Iglesias ◽  
Sabarinath Radhakrishnan ◽  
Jennie Y. Law ◽  
...  

Abstract B cell lymphoma is the most common hematologic malignancy in the United States. Although treatment options have greatly improved in the past several decades, outcomes for patients with relapsed B cell lymphoma remain poor. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have recently entered the clinic with promise to address the gap in effective therapies for patients relapsed B cell lymphoma. However, antigen loss and poor CAR T cell persistence has been shown to drive resistance to the widely approved CD19-targeted CAR in some patients, demonstrating the need for additional therapies. Here, we demonstrate CD229-targeted CAR T cell therapy as a promising option for the treatment of relapsed B cell lymphoma, addressing an important group of patients with typically poor outcomes. CD229 is an immune-modulating receptor expressed on the surface of B cells that we recently found to be highly expressed in the plasma cell neoplasm multiple myeloma (Radhakrishnan et al. 2020). We utilized semi-quantitative PCR and flow cytometry to assess whether CD229 is also expressed on malignant B cells earlier in development as found in B cell lymphoma. Expression analysis revealed the presence of CD229 in a panel of 11 B cell lymphoma cell lines and 45 primary B cell lymphoma samples comprising several subsets of disease including aggressive B cell lymphomas such as diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and Burkitt lymphoma as well as indolent subtypes of B cell lymphoma including chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL) and follicular lymphoma. Of note, CD229 was found to be overexpressed on primary B cell lymphoma cells when compared to autologous normal B cells. Given the high levels of CD229 expression throughout all B cell lymphoma subtypes analyzed, we generated CD229 CAR T cells in order to determine whether CAR T cell therapy is an effective way to target CD229 expressing B cell lymphoma cells. CD229 CAR T cells exhibited robust cytotoxicity when cocultured with B cell lymphoma cell lines and primary samples characterized by significant production of TH1 cytokines IL-2, TNF and IFNγ and rapid loss of B cell lymphoma cell viability when compared to control CAR T cells lacking an antigen binding scFv domain (∆scFv CAR T cells). In vivo analysis revealed effective tumor control in NSG mice carrying B cell lymphoma cell lines JeKo-1 (MCL) and DB (DLBCL) when treated with CD229 CAR T cells versus ∆scFv CAR T cells. Finally, we sought to determine the efficacy of CD229 CAR T cells in the context of CD19 CAR T cell therapy relapse. Here, a 71-year-old patient with CLL had an initial response when treated with CD19 CAR T cells but quickly relapsed only 2 months after treatment. Malignant cells from the CLL patient retained CD229 expression as identified by flow cytometry and an ex vivo coculture with CD229 CAR T cells revealed robust killing of CLL cells by CD229 CAR T cells. Transfer of antigen from target cell to CAR T cell by trogocytosis was recently suggested to drive relapse following CAR T cell therapy by decreasing antigen on tumor cells and promoting CAR T cell fratricide (Hamieh et al. 2019). We cocultured CD19 and CD229 CAR T cells with primary CLL cells and assessed CD19 and CD229 expression as well as CAR T cell viability by flow cytometry. In contrast with CD19 CAR T cells, CD229 CARs did not strip their target antigen from the surface of CLL cells. The transfer of CD19 from CLL cells to CD19 CAR T cells resulted in poor CAR T cell viability while CD229 CAR T cell viability remained high following coculture. In summary, we demonstrate that CD229 is a promising therapeutic target in B cell lymphoma due to its high levels of expression throughout many subtypes of disease. CD229 CAR T cells effectively kill B cell lymphoma cells in vitro and control growth of aggressive B cell lymphomas in vivo. Finally, CD229 CAR T cells are effective against primary CLL cells from patients that have relapsed from CD19 CAR T cell therapy and do no exhibit antigen loss by trogocytosis. Taken together, these data suggest that CD229 CAR T cell therapy may be a promising option to address the poor outcomes for patients with relapsed B cell lymphoma. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (19) ◽  
pp. 3789-3793
Author(s):  
Susanne Jung ◽  
Jochen Greiner ◽  
Stephanie von Harsdorf ◽  
Pavle Popovic ◽  
Roland Moll ◽  
...  

Abstract Treatment with CD19-directed (CAR) T cells has evolved as a standard of care for multiply relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL). A common side effect of this treatment is the immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Severe ICANS can occur in up to 30% to 40% of patients treated with axicabtagene-ciloleucel (axi-cel), usually within the first 4 weeks after administration of the dose and usually responding well to steroids. We describe a case of progressive central neurotoxicity occurring 9 months after axi-cel infusion in a patient with r/r LBCL who had undergone a prior allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Despite extensive systemic and intrathecal immunosuppression, neurological deterioration was inexorable and eventually fatal within 5 months. High CAR T-cell DNA copy numbers and elevated levels of interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-6 were found in the cerebral spinal fluid as clinical symptoms emerged, and CAR T-cell brain infiltration was observed on autopsy, suggesting that CAR T cells played a major pathogenetic role. This case of unexpected, devastating, late neurotoxicity warrants intensified investigation of neurological off-target effects of CD19-directed CAR T cells and highlights the need for continuous monitoring for late toxicities in this vulnerable patient population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document