scholarly journals Age-related Diseases of Inflammation in Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lachelle Dawn Weeks ◽  
Catherine R Marinac ◽  
Robert A Redd ◽  
Gregory A Abel ◽  
Amy Erica Lin ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 879-884
Author(s):  
Anne Laure Roupie ◽  
Alexis Guedon ◽  
Benjamin Terrier ◽  
Constance Lahuna ◽  
Vincent Jachiet ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 566-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Locatelli ◽  
C Niemeyer ◽  
E Angelucci ◽  
C Bender-Götze ◽  
S Burdach ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To evaluate the role of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in children with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-three children with CMML given BMT and reported to the European Working Group on Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Childhood (EWOG-MDS) data base were evaluated. In 25 cases, the donor was a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical or a one-antigen-disparate relative, in four cases a mismatched family donor, and in 14 a matched unrelated donor (MUD). Conditioning regimens consisted of total-body irradiation (TBI) and chemotherapy in 22 patients, whereas busulfan (Bu) with other cytotoxic drugs was used in the remaining patients. RESULTS Six of 43 patients (14%), five of whom received transplants from alternative donors, failed to engraft. There was a significant difference in the incidences of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) between children transplanted from compatible/one-antigen-mismatched relatives and from alternative donors (23% and 87%, respectively; P < .005). Probabilities of transplant-related mortality for children given BMT from HLA-identical/one-antigen-disparate relatives or from MUD/ mismatched relatives were 9% and 46%, respectively. The probability of relapse for the entire group was 58%, whereas the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate was 31%. The EFS rate for children given BMT from an HLA-identical sibling or one-antigen-disparate relative was 38%. In this latter group, patients who received Bu had a better EFS compared with those given TBI (62% v 11%, P < .01). CONCLUSION Children with CMML and an HLA-compatible relative should be transplanted as early as possible. Improvement of donor selection, GVHD prophylaxis, and supportive care are needed to ameliorate results of BMT from alternative donors.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2381-2381
Author(s):  
Teresa Field ◽  
Janelle Perkins ◽  
Taiga Nishihori ◽  
Joseph Pidala ◽  
Hugo F. Fernandez ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2381 Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only curative treatment strategy for patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML). Recent reduction of the transplant related toxicity has permitted the expansion of empiric age limitations for HCT up to 75 years. There has been limited comparative data on HCT focusing on donor availability in patients with MDS/CMML. Between January 2004 and September 2009, a total of 255 new patients (NP) with a diagnosis of MDS or CMML were evaluated for HCT at Moffitt Cancer Center. This report describes the outcomes of these patients with emphasis on donor availability. Donor Search Results: Of the 255 NP, 58 did not undergo a donor search. Reasons for not proceeding were as follows: Medicare declined coverage due to age >65 (18), waiting as have low risk disease (15), patient declined (6), patient seen as second opinion only (7) and patient was not eligible for HCT (12). These patients were not included in the survival analysis. Of the 197 patients who had a donor search initiated, a sibling (SIB) matched unrelated (MUD) or single HLA antigen/allele mismatch (mMUD) unrelated adult donor was found in 173 patients. A suitable adult donor was not identified in the remaining 24 patients. To mitigate bias due to factors giving a survival advantage to patients who were stable enough to survive the donor and proceed to HCT, the survival analysis included only those patients alive 90 days after the donor search was initiated. We have been able to identify donors within this time frame for 99% of the patients who ever found one, although time to transplant is longer. At the 90 days landmark, there were 164 patient in the Donor cohort, and 19 patients in the No Donor cohort. Donor Cohort: The median age was 56.6 yrs (18.5 – 73.5). Ninety-seven patients (59%) were older than 55 yrs and 26 (16%) were above 65 yrs. At the time of the transplant consult, IPSS risk was Low (10), Int-1 (44), Int-2 (48), High (25), AML (21), CMML (13), or not evaluable (NE) (3). Donors included SIB (60), MUD (75) and mMUD (29). Median follow-up of surviving patients is 27.7months (7.2 – 70.7). No Donor Cohort: Median age was 57.4 yrs (32.6 – 68.1) with 12 patients (63%) older than 55 yrs and 3 (16%) patients older than 65 years of age. IPSS at initiation of the donor search was Int-1 (5), Int-2 (6), High (5), AML (1) and CMML (2). Median follow-up is 9.2 months (1.4 – 61.5). Of the 19 patients with no donor, 3 patients received an umbilical cord blood HCT elsewhere and were analyzed by intent to treat. Outcomes: Patients with a donor had significantly improved overall survival from time of donor search vs. patients with no donor (P=0.007) with 2 year OS of 48% vs. 23%, respectively. Median survival for the donor group was 22.2 months [95% CI 14.7 – 35.7] vs. 10.1 months for those without a donor [95% CI 2.3 – 14.7]. Transplant: Of the 164 patients with a donor, 121 (74%) patients received the planned allogenic transplants. The 2-year overall survival (OS) after transplantation is similar for SIB (51%), MUD (39%) or mMUD (68%) transplant recipients (P=0.4), and also similar by age below or above 55 years (P=0.7). These data demonstrate that most patients with MDS or CMML can have a suitable donor identified and proceed to HCT. Overall survival is significantly improved for those patients who have a suitable sibling or unrelated donor. Disclosures: Lancet: Eisai: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria. Alsina: Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. List: Celgene: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document