Self-Managed Long-Term Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Compared with Usual-Care Anticoagulation for Patients with Proximal Venous Thrombosis: Harm Associated with Bleeding!.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 901-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell D. Hull ◽  
Graham F. Pineo ◽  
Rollin F. Brant ◽  

Abstract Context: A substantial clinical need exists for an alternate to vitamin-K-antagonists for treating deep-vein thrombosis in many patients. Long-term low-molecular-weight heparin, body-weight adjusted, avoids anticoagulant monitoring and may be associated with less harm due to bleeding. Objective: Considerable evidence suggests that reporting of harms-related data* from randomized clinical trials needs improvement. In accordance with CONSORT* we present a harm analysis regarding hemorrhagic complications. Design: Randomized clinical trial using objective outcome measures. Setting: 30 centres across Canada. Participants: Acute symptomatic proximal-vein thrombosis patients. Intervention: Therapeutic tinzaparin subcutaneously once-daily, or usual-care intravenous unfractionated heparin/vitamin-K-antagonists for 3 months. Main Outcome Measures: Benefit was assessed by assessing the frequency of symptomatic objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism and harm by objectively documented hemorrhagic complications. Results: A broad-spectrum of patients was randomized. Of 737 patients, 18 of 369 receiving tinzaparin (4.9 percent) suffered recurrent venous thromboembolism at three months compared with 21 of 368 (5.7 percent) receiving usual-care; (absolute difference, −0.9 percent, 95 percent confidence interval −4.1 to 2.4). Hemorrhagic complications occurred less frequently in the low-molecular-weight heparin group; 48 of 369 patients, (13.0 percent) versus usual-care 73 of 368, (19.8 percent), (absolute difference −6.8 percent; p=0.011; risk ratio = 0.66). The prevalence of major bleeding according to the duration of study treatment favored low-molecular-weight heparin therapy. Major bleeding persisted throughout study treatment for patients in the usual-care group receiving warfarin but ceased early by day 23 in the low-molecular-weight heparin group (p=0.034). Twenty-five patients (6.8 percent) in the low-molecular-weight heparin group and 24 patients (6.5 percent) receiving usual-care died (absolute difference 0.3 percent, 95 percent confidence interval −3.4 to 3.9). Conclusion: Our findings are clinically relevant and important, offering the clinician an alternate therapy to vitamin-K-antagonist therapy which does not require anticoagulant monitoring in a wide range of patients with proximal venous thrombosis. Self-management with once-daily subcutaneous tinzaparin was at least as effective as usual-care and vitamin-K-antagonist therapy and offers a safety advantage with less harm due to bleeding.

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Priyanka ◽  
J. T. Kupec ◽  
M. Krafft ◽  
N. A. Shah ◽  
G. J. Reynolds

Background. Newer oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are being utilized increasingly for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). NOAC use is the standard of care for stroke prophylaxis in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and treatment of acute VTE involving extremities and pulmonary embolism. In contrast, most guidelines in the literature support the treatment of acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Literature evaluating NOAC use in the treatment of acute portal vein thrombosis is sparse. This review focuses on the safety and efficacy of the use of NOACs in the treatment of acute PVT in patients, with or without concomitant cirrhosis, based on the most recent data available in the current literature. Methods. A systematic review was conducted through a series of advanced searches in the following medical databases: PubMed, BioMed Central, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. Keywords utilized were as follows: NOAC, DOAC (direct oral anticoagulants), portal vein thrombosis, rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban. Articles related to newer anticoagulant use in patients with portal vein thrombosis were included. Results. The adverse events, including bleeding events (major and minor) and the failure of anticoagulation (propagation of thrombus or recurrence of PVT), are similar between the NOACs and traditional anticoagulants for the treatment of acute PVT, irrespective of the presence of cirrhosis. Conclusions. Newer oral anticoagulants are safe and efficacious alternatives to traditional anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin and vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of acute portal vein thrombosis with or without cirrhosis.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4142-4142
Author(s):  
Russell D. Hull ◽  
Graham F. Pineo ◽  
Rollin F. Brant ◽  

Abstract Context: A substantial clinical need exists for an alternate to vitamin-K-antagonists for treating deep-vein thrombosis in many patients. Long-term low-molecular-weight heparin, body-weight adjusted, avoids anticoagulant monitoring and may be associated with less harm due to thrombocytopenia. Objective: Considerable evidence suggests that reporting of harms-related data* from randomized clinical trials needs improvement. In accordance with CONSORT* we present a harm analysis regarding thrombocytopenia. Design: Randomized clinical trial using objective outcome measures. Setting: 30 centres across Canada. Participants: Acute symptomatic proximal-vein thrombosis patients. Intervention: Therapeutic tinzaparin subcutaneously once-daily, or intravenous unfractionated heparin/oral vitamin-K-antagonist therapy for 3 months. Main Outcome Measures: Benefit was assessed by assessing the frequency of symptomatic objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism and harm by objectively documented hemorrhagic complications and the outcome of thrombocytopenia. Results: Benefit and bleeding harm are reported elsewhere. Long-term low-molecular-weight heparin treatment was at least as effective but associated with less harm due to bleeding than usual care. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 21 of 369 (5.7%) patients receiving tinzaparin versus 9 of 368 (2.4%) patients receiving usual care (absolute difference 3.3). Six of 9 patients with thrombocytopenia receiving usual care died (66.7 percent, 95 percent confidence interval 29.9 to 92.5) versus 4 of 21 with thrombocytopenia receiving low-molecular-weight heparin (19 percent, 95 percent confidence interval 5.4 to 41.9 percent) (absolute difference 47.6 percent, 95 percent confidence interval 82.7 to 12.5 percent, p=0.03). Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred infrequently in patients with thrombocytopenia. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that harm associated with thrombocytopenia in patients receiving intravenous unfractionated heparin versus low-molecular-weight heparin favors low-molecular-weight heparin use. Further evaluation in rigorous trials is required.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flávia Dias Xavier ◽  
Paulo Marcelo Gehm Hoff ◽  
Maria Ignez Braghiroli ◽  
Ana Carolina Carvalho Rocha Paterlini ◽  
Karla Teixeira Souza ◽  
...  

Background Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are common and potentially fatal complications in cancer patients, and they are responsible for the second most common cause of death. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is the gold-standard treatment, but the costs involved limit its use, especially in developing countries. Recently, the oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban, which directly inhibits factor Xa, was approved for VTE treatment. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis from January 2009 to February 2014 with patients who had cancer and VTE who were receiving rivaroxaban. We compared the efficacy, safety, and cost of rivaroxaban and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) alone or followed by vitamin K antagonists. Results Forty-one patients were identified, with a median age of 62.5 years. The most frequent tumor histology was adenocarcinoma (78%), which was most often found in the colon (26.8%). Most participants had advanced disease and an implanted central venous catheter. Patients’ VTE risk-assessment scores were low (12.5%), intermediate (50%), and high (35.5%). Pulmonary thromboembolism was reported in 41.4% of patients, but inferior limb thrombosis was reported only in 14.6%; 43.9% of patients received enoxaparin before starting rivaroxaban. Rivaroxaban was used for a median time of 5.5 months. Nonmajor bleeding was reported in 12.2% of patients, and rethrombosis was reported in 12.2%. In our study, rivaroxaban was as safe and effective as enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonists ( P = .54 and P = .25, respectively) or LMWH ( P = .46 and P = .29, respectively). Conclusion Although our study was a retrospective analysis, our results suggest that in this cohort of oncologic patients, rivaroxaban was safe and effective. Its oral route and lower cost make it an attractive alternative to LMWH, improving management of patients with cancer in low-income countries. Additional studies are necessary to confirm our data.


2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (07) ◽  
pp. 42-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grigoris T. Gerotziafas ◽  
Charlotte Dupont ◽  
Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽  
Mohamed Hatmi ◽  
Meyer M. Samama ◽  
...  

SummaryVitamin K antagonists (VKA) treatment starts with co-administration of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). The anticoagulation induced by the two drugs is still not well determined. In the present study we used thrombin generation assay to evaluate the hypo-coagulation induced by treatment with VKA and by the combination of VKA with LMWH. Tissue factor triggered thrombin generation in platelet-poor plasma was assessed in samples from 15 healthy volunteers, 97 samples from patients treated with VKA and 41 samples from patients receiving enoxaparin and VKA. Patients were classified according to international normalised ratio (INR) level (<2, 2–3 and >3).In plasma samples from patients treated with VKA having INR 2–3 the inhibition of thrombin generation reached 50% compared to controls. In samples with INR>3 this inhibition was 80%. In samples from patients receiving both LMWH and VKA, thrombin generation was significantly decreased compared to the controls and VKA group. In samples with an INR 2–3 obtained from patients treated with LMWH and VKA, the inhibition of thrombin generation was similar to that observed in samples with an INR>3 obtained from VKA treated patients. Thrombin generation assay is sensitive to detect the global the anticoagulant effect produced by the association of LMWH and VKA. For equal INR dual anticoagulant treatment induces significantly more profound inhibition of thrombin generation compared to treatment with VKA alone. The clinical relevance of this observation merits to be studied in prospective studies in patients with defined indications of anticoagulant therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document