Phase 1 Clinical Study of Atacicept in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2722-2722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Ansell ◽  
Thomas E. Witzig ◽  
Anne Novak ◽  
David James ◽  
Luis Porrata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

Abstract Background: Atacicept (TACI-Ig) is a recombinant fusion protein that inhibits BLyS (B lymphocyte stimulator) and APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand), cytokines that are involved in B-cell homeostasis and immunoglobulin (Ig) expression and are overexpressed in B-cell malignancies. In vitro, atacicept decreases the survival of lymphoma cells and in vivo, atacicept decreases serum immunoglobulin levels. Based on its effects on B cells, atacicept may offer a novel treatment for B-cell malignancies. Methods: A Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study of atacicept in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma was performed. Atacicept was administered subcutaneously for 5 weeks in single weekly doses of 2, 4, 7, or 10 mg/kg to sequential patient cohorts. After 8 weeks, patients with responding or stable disease were eligible for treatment on an extension study at the dose previously received for up to 24 weeks or until disease progression. The primary study objective was evaluation of overall safety and the maximum tolerated dose. Pharmacokinetics and biomarkers were also investigated. Results: As of July 2006, 15 patients with relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (7), follicular lymphoma (4), small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (2), and mantle-cell lymphoma (2) received 2, 4, or 7 mg/kg atacicept (4 patients per dose cohort) or 10 mg/kg atacicept (3 patients). All patients were heavily pretreated (median number of previous treatments was 5, range 1–10) and 4 patients had previously received a stem cell transplant. All patients completed study treatment (5 doses), except 2 who withdrew due to disease progression after receiving 2 and 4 doses. Atacicept was well tolerated at all doses. The most common adverse events (AEs) that occurred in ≥20% of patients were fatigue (47%) and injection site bruising (20%). Three AEs with ≥ grade 3 severity were reported for 1 patient including pain in jaw, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and sepsis; all were considered unrelated to atacicept. Four SAEs considered unrelated to atacicept were reported for 2 patients who withdrew due to disease progression. Pharmacokinetic results were nonlinear and consistent with observations in other indications. Five weekly doses produced low to moderate accumulation of free total atacicept and atacicept/BLyS complex in serum. IgA, IgG, and IgM concentrations decreased in a dose-related pattern with a mean decrease of 15–40% from baseline after 4 weeks of atacicept. Peripheral B-cell numbers were variable and were difficult to evaluate due to low B-cell values at baseline in the majority of patients. At the 8-week evaluation, no objective responses were observed. Two patients had stable disease (1 with mantle cell lymphoma and 1 with follicular lymphoma) at 8 weeks, entered the extension study, and received additional doses of atacicept with no safety or tolerability concerns. Both patients however later discontinued treatment due to disease progression. Conclusion: Atacicept at doses of up to 10 mg/kg was well tolerated and demonstrated biological activity by decreasing Ig concentrations in this heavily pretreated cohort of patients with refractory B-cell lymphoma, although tumor responses were not observed.

Safety and Efficacy of Bendamustine with or without Rituximab for the Treatment of Heavily Pretreated CLL and Lymphoma Patients. A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1662-1662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Rigacci ◽  
Benedetta Puccini ◽  
Enrico Orciuolo ◽  
Alfonso D'Arco ◽  
Sergio Storti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Abstract 1662 Poster Board I-688 Introduction Bendamustine is an alkylating agent with a nitrogen mustard group and a purine like benzimidazol group. Recently this drug was introduced in Italy. We analized all pts treated in sixteen haematological Italian centers with Bendamustine alone or in combination with anti-CD20 antibody. Patients and methods On an intention to treat basis pts who have received at least one complete cycle were evaluable for response and toxicity. The treatments consisted of: Bendamustine 60-90 mg/m2 days 1,2 alone or in combination with Rituximab 375 mg/m2 day 0, every 21 or 28 days. 173 pts were analized, median age was 67 (range 31-87), 114 were male, 63 chronic lymphatic leukaemia 41 indolent non-follicular lymphoma, 26 diffuse large B cell lymphoma, 26 follicular lymphoma, 15 mantle cell lymphoma, 2 Peripheral T cell lymphoma. Pts were heavily pretreated, the median number of previous treatments was 3,5 (range 1-8), 121 pts have experienced more than three chemotherapy schemes. One hundred and twenty-seven pts were previously treated with Rituximab and 24 performed an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The Bendamustine pre-treatment condition was: 70 relapsed pts, 40 with refractory disease and 63 with a progressive disease after partial response. The median number of Bendamustine cycles was 4.3 (range 1-11). Results All patients were evaluable for response: 48 pts (28%) obtained a complete remission, 78 (45%) a partial response or stable disease with an overall response rate of 73% and 47 were non responders. According to histotype we observed that 10/15 pts (67%) with mantle cell lymphoma obtained a response (6 CR;4 PR), 37/41 (9 CR; 28 PR) indolent non follicular lymphoma and 25/26 (96%) follicular lymphoma obtained a response (12 CR;13 PR), 46/63 CLL obtained a response and 8/26 (31%) DLBCL obtained a response to therapy (4 CR;4 PR), none of the two T lymphoma pts responded to therapy. With a median period of observation of 12 months (1-46) 121 (70%) pts are alive and 83 pts are in complete remission or with stable disease without any other treatment. The overall survival was 82%, 72%, 68% and 27% respectively for indolent, CLL, mantle cell and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The progression free survival was 31%, 27%, 15% and 10% respectively for indolent, CLL, mantle cell and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Fifthy-two pts died, 47 for progressive disease, 11 due to infection and sepsis (6%) and 2 due to other causes not related with therapy or disease. In this group of heavily pretreated pts 760 cycles were performed. The extrahematological toxicity was mild the most important problem were infections (Herpes Zooster, pneumonia, enteritis) reported in 16 pts, hepatic in 4 and cardiologic in 2 pts. The hematological toxicity was trombocytopenia grade 3-4 in 20 pts (12%), neutropenia grade 3-4 in 40 pts (23%) and anemia grade 3-4 in 19 pts (11%). Discussion In conclusion this retrospective study shows that treatment with Bendamustine alone or in combination with Rituximab is a safe and efficacy regimen in a subset of pluriresistent patients. This data shows also that the best results could be obtained in indolent lymphoma and CLL incouraging data in mantle cell lymphoma are reported. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Ongoing phase 1/2 study of INCB050465 for relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies (CITADEL-101).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7530-7530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rod Ramchandren ◽  
Tycel Jovelle Phillips ◽  
Michael Wertheim ◽  
Martin Gutierrez ◽  
William Jeffery Edenfield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Ongoing Phase

7530 Background: INCB050465 is a selective PI3Kδ inhibitor with no preclinical hepatotoxicity at clinically relevant doses. We report emerging safety and efficacy data from a phase 1/2 study of INCB050465 in patients (pts) with r/r B-cell malignancies (NCT02018861). Methods: The protocol was initiated with a single patient cohort, treated with INCB050465 5 mg QD PO. Subsequent cohorts used a 3+3 design and evaluated doses of 10–45 mg QD. Based on PK/PD, the 20 and 30 mg QD cohorts were expanded. Responses were assessed Q9W by the Lugano Classification or International Working Group on Chronic Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL) criteria. Results: As of the data cutoff (Nov 1, 2016), 52 pts were treated (median age, 65 y [range, 30–88]; baseline tumors: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], n=14; follicular lymphoma [FL], n=10; Hodgkin lymphoma [HL], n=9; marginal zone lymphoma [MZL], n=8; CLL, n=6; mantle cell lymphoma [MCL], n=5; 62% had >3 prior systemic regimens). Median duration of therapy was 3.3 mo (range, 0.6–13.4); no DLTs were identified. 67% of pts discontinued therapy (disease progression, 31%; AEs, 25%); 33% had dose interruption; 4% had reduction. Most common nonhematologic AEs (all grade [Gr]; Gr ≥3): nausea (38%; 0%), diarrhea (31%; 6%), vomiting (25%; 0%); Gr ≥3 hematologic AEs: neutropenia (21%), lymphopenia (17%), thrombocytopenia (10%), anemia (4%). 40% of pts had serious AEs, most frequently colitis, diarrhea, hypotension (all n=3). 1 pt had Gr 3 pneumonitis; none had Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) or Gr ≥2 elevated transaminase. Objective responses (ORs) occurred at all doses (Table), except 5 mg QD; 90% were observed at first assessment. Conclusions: INCB050465 demonstrated manageable toxicities with no clinically meaningful transaminitis/PJP. OR rates were generally high, with 90% observed at first assessment. Different dosing regimens/schedules, long-term safety, and disease-specific cohorts are being evaluated. Clinical trial information: NCT02018861. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Parsaclisib, a potent and highly selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (16) ◽  
pp. 1742-1752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Radhakrishnan Ramchandren ◽  
Abdulraheem Yacoub ◽  
Michael S. Wertheim ◽  
William J. Edenfield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract This phase 1/2 study assessed parsaclisib (INCB050465), a next-generation, potent, and highly selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ (PI3Kδ) inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies, alone or in combination with a Janus kinase 1 inhibitor (itacitinib) or chemotherapy (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide). Seventy-two patients received parsaclisib monotherapy (5-45 mg once daily). Expansion doses were 20 and 30 mg once daily; intermittent dosing at 20 mg (once daily for 9 weeks, then once weekly) was explored. No dose-limiting toxicities were identified, and maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Most common nonhematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea/colitis (36%), nausea (36%), fatigue (31%), and rash (31%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 19% of patients. Serious TEAEs (>2 patients) were diarrhea/colitis (n = 9), pyrexia (n = 4), hypotension (n = 3), and sepsis (n = 3). Aspartate and alanine transaminase elevations occurring before treatment discontinuation were grade 1, except 1 grade 3 event each, secondary to sepsis. Two patients experienced 3 fatal parsaclisib-unrelated TEAEs (respiratory failure; respiratory failure and sepsis). In non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), objective response rates to monotherapy were 71% in follicular lymphoma, 78% in marginal zone lymphoma, 67% in mantle cell lymphoma, and 30% in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; 93% of responses occurred at first assessment (∼9 weeks). Parsaclisib has demonstrated antitumor activity in relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL with the potential for improved long-term patient outcomes. Phase 2 studies in relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL subtypes are ongoing. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02018861.

scholarly journals Safety and Anti-Tumor Activity Study of Loncastuximab Tesirine and Durvalumab in Diffuse Large B-Cell, Mantle Cell, or Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2807-2807
Author(s):  
Craig H. Moskowitz ◽  
Mariana Bastos-Oreiro ◽  
David Ungar ◽  
Ilva Dautaj ◽  
Matko Kalac
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity ◽  
Large B Cell

Introduction: Loncastuximab tesirine (Lonca) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) comprising a humanized anti-CD19 antibody (Ab) conjugated to a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer toxin. In a Phase 1, first-in-human ADCT-402-101 clinical study, Lonca demonstrated single-agent anti-tumor activity with manageable toxicity in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). Durvalumab is a human monoclonal Ab of the immunoglobulin G-1 kappa subclass that blocks the interaction of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) with PD-1 on T-cells and with CD80 (B7.1) on other immune cells. Blockade of PD-L1/PD-1 and PD-L1/CD80 interactions releases the inhibition of immune responses, including those that may result in tumor elimination. Preclinical data, as well as early results from clinical trials combining ADCs and checkpoint inhibitors, show potentially increased effectiveness of these therapeutics when used in combination and provide the rationale for the current trial. Study Design and Methods: This is a Phase 1b, open-label, dose escalation (Part 1) and expansion (Part 2) trial of Lonca combined with durvalumab in patients with R/R DLBCL, MCL, or FL (NCT03685344). The key inclusion and exclusion criteria for the ADCT-402-104 study are reported in Table 1, and the dosing schema is presented in Figure 1. This trial will evaluate the safety and tolerability, preliminary anti-tumor activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of Lonca combined with durvalumab. Patients will receive Lonca once every 3 weeks for 2 doses in total, and durvalumab every 4 weeks for up to 1 year. Patients with only partial response or stable disease at the second disease evaluation may receive 2 additional doses of Lonca given once every 3 weeks. During Part 1, the dose of Lonca will be escalated using a classic 3+3 design with a fixed dose of durvalumab. Part 2 will consist of up to 3 expansion cohorts, one for each of the DLBCL, MCL, and FL populations. All patients in Part 2 will receive the dose of Lonca determined in Part 1, with a fixed dose of durvalumab. The trial opened in February 2019 and recruitment is ongoing. Study sponsored by ADC Therapeutics SA with the support of MedImmune Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals PLC, which supplies durvalumab (http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03685344). Disclosures Moskowitz: ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ungar:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Other: Stock options. equity interest. Dautaj:ADC Therapeutics: Employment, Other: Stock options.

Zilovertamab Vedotin Targeting of ROR1 as Therapy for Lymphoid Cancers

NEJM Evidence ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Wang ◽  
Jacqueline C. Barrientos ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Matthew Mei ◽  
Paul M. Barr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Large B Cell ◽  
Antibody Drug ◽  
Drug Complex

In a phase 1 trial involving patients with refractory lymphoid cancer, an antibody-drug complex directed against ROR1 had no unexpected toxicities. About half of the patients with mantle cell lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma had clinically meaningful responses.

Safety and Efficacy of Bendamustine with or without Rituximab in the Treatment of Heavily Pretreated Patients with Haematological Malignancies: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4945-4945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Rigacci ◽  
Benedetta Puccini ◽  
Alberto Bosi ◽  
Sergio Cortelazzo ◽  
Sergio Storti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Bendamustine is an purine analog alkylating agent with marked efficacy in haematological malignancies either when given as monotherapy or in combination with rituximab. The efficacy and safety of this drug was investigated in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with hematological malignancies. A total of 44 patients (median age 63 years ranging from 22–87) from 6 Italian centers treated with bendamustine alone or in combination with rituximab were analyzed in this retrospective study. The diagnoses were multiple myeloma (n=2), chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=19), diffuse large B cell lymphoma (n=7), follicular lymphoma (n=8), mantle cell lymphoma (n=4), marginal zone lymphoma (n=2), Hodgkin’s disease (n=1) and peripheral T cell lymphoma (n=1). All pts received bendamustine 60–90 mg/m2 at day 1+2, alone or in combination with rituximab 375 mg/m2 (n=35) at day 1 of each cycle given every 21 or 28 days. The pts were heavily pretreated with a median of 3 previous treatments (range 1–8); 37 pts had previously received rituximab and 9 pts had undergone autologous transplantation. Prior to receiving bendamustine, 14 pts had relapsed disease, 7 had refractory disease and 23 were progressing during therapy. The median number of bendamustine cycles was 3 (range 1–8); 11 pts were still on treatment at the time of this analysis. Patients who completed therapy with at least 1 cycle of chemotherapy were evaluated for response and toxicity; pts in continuous therapy were evaluated for toxicity only. Of 33 pts evaluable for response 7 pts achieved a CR (21%) and 14 a PR (42%) resulting in an ORR of 64%. The remaining 12 pts were non-responders. No differences in the results were observed between groups with different bendamustine doses or scheduling. The best results were obtained in 10 evaluable pts with indolent lymphoma (4 CR, 6 PR) and in 9 pts with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (1 CR, 6 PR). Two evaluable pts with mantle cell lymphoma obtained a response (1 CR, 1 PR). By contrast, only 1 pt with diffuse large B cell lymphoma of 6 patients evaluable for response obtained a CR: the other 5 were non-responders. No pt with myeloma, Hodgkin’s disease or T cell lymphoma achieved a response. After a median follow-up of 4 months, 80% of pts were alive. During 150 treatment cycles, 2 pts experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia and 1 experienced grade 4 neutropenia; non-hematological toxicity was mild. In conclusion, this retrospective analysis shows that treatment with bendamustine, alone or in combination with rituximab, is a safe and effective regimen in heavily pretreated pts. The best results were obtained in indolent lymphoma: the data in mantle cell lymphoma were also encouraging. No lack of efficacy can be inferred in pts with diffuse large B cell lymphoma, due to the refractory nature of their disease and the advanced age of this particular group (median age 76 years ranging from 67–87).

Forodesine (Immucillin H, BCX-1777) Shows Activity on Mantle Cell Lymphoma Primary Cells

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4997-4997
Author(s):  
Andrea Rinaldi ◽  
Emilia Ceresa ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Gianluca Gaidano ◽  
Shanta Bantia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Annexin V ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
New Therapeutic Approaches ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) represents a subtype of B-cell lymphoma associated with a very unfavourable clinical outcome. Currently no therapy can be considered as standard, and new therapeutic approaches are needed. Forodesine is a potent inhibitor of purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP), whose major role is to catalyze the cleavage of inosine, deoxyinosine guanosine, and deoxyguanosine (dGuo) to their corresponding base and sugar 1-phosphate by phosphorolysis. In the presence of deoxycytidine kinase, PNP inhibition leads to an increase in the concentration of dGuo triphosphate (dGTP), followed by inhibition of DNA synthesis and cell death by apoptosis. When combined with dGuo, forodesine has been shown to have in vitro cytotoxic activity on T-cell (T-ALL, T-PLL) and on B-cell malignancies (CLL, B-ALL), and Phase I/II trials are on going in CLL and CTCL patients. Here, we report the first data on in vitro activity of forodesine in MCL. Primary MCL cells, derived from six patients, were exposed to forodesine (0, 2, 20 μM) in combination with dGuo (0, 10, 20 μM), for 48 hrs. Cells were cultured in X-VIVO 10 medium (Cambrex) with 10% FBS. Cell viability was assessed by flow cytometry with the Annexin V - propidium iodide assay. Four patient samples (67%) showed an increase in the number of Annexin V positive cells ranging from 1.9 to 5.3 times compared to untreated cells. The effect was larger for 20 μM forodesine compared with 2 μM. There was no effect of dGuo alone and only a minimal effect of increasing dGuo concentration from 10 μM to 20 μM. Cell lines did not appear to be ideal models to evaluate the efficacy of forodesine in vitro. Three established MCL cell lines (Granta-519, Rec, JeKo1) were treated with escalating doses of forodesine, but the results were not reproducible, while the same cells showed expected IC50 values between 25–30 μM when exposed to bendamustine for 72 hrs. In conclusion, the in vitro data reported here with 4/6 MCL patients primary samples sensitive to forodesine and the results from various groups on other T- and B-cell malignancies suggest that clinical trials of forodesine in MCL may be warranted.

Ofatumumab Monotherapy for Treatment of Patients with Relapsed/Progressive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results From a Multicenter Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3955-3955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
André Bosly ◽  
Ka Lung Wu ◽  
Gregor Verhoef ◽  
Van Eygen Koen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Abstract 3955 Background: Patients (pts) with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or relapsing after ASCT have a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. New treatment options are needed for these pts. Ofatumumab is a human monoclonal antibody that targets a membrane-proximal epitope comprising both the large loop and small loop of CD20, and has shown effective lysis of chemotherapy-refractory DLBCL cells in vitro (Teeling et al. Blood 2004; Cillessen et al. Blood 2007; abstract 2346). We report the first results from an open-label, single-arm, international Phase II trial that evaluated ofatumumab monotherapy in relapsed or progressive DLBCL. Methods: Pts (age ≥18 years) with relapsed or progressive CD20+ DLBCL ineligible for ASCT or with relapsed or progressive disease after ASCT were enrolled between December 2007 and August 2009 (N=81). Relapsed or progressive disease was defined as relapse after a complete remission (CR) or disease progression after partial remission (PR). Pts received 8 weekly infusions of ofatumumab (dose 1, 300 mg; doses 2–8, 1000 mg). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) evaluated during the 6 months from the start of treatment, as assessed by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee according to the revised response criteria (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol 2007). Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Baseline characteristics are shown in the Table. Pts were heavily pretreated (median 3 prior systemic therapies), and 32% of pts did not respond to their last prior therapy. Nearly all pts (96%) had received prior rituximab-containing treatment; 54% had received 2 or more courses of prior rituximab therapy (Table). Overall, 58% of pts completed all 8 infusions of ofatumumab, 65% received at least 6 infusions, and 81% received at least 4 infusions. The primary reason for treatment discontinuation was disease progression. The ORR (95% CI) was 11% (4–18%), including 3 CRs (4%) and 6 PRs (7%). Of these 9 responding pts, 8 had responded to their last systemic therapy. The median duration of response (95% CI) was 6.9 months (5.3–6.9) and median PFS (95% CI) was 2.5 months (2.3–2.9). Infusion-related events occurred in 59% of pts, primarily occurred during infusion 1 (40% of pts) and infusion 2 (22%), and subsided during subsequent infusions; these events were predominantly grade 1–2 in severity (96% of pts). The most common (>10% of pts) adverse events (AEs; any grade) were diarrhea (17%), fatigue (15%), peripheral edema (15%), neutropenia (14%), abdominal pain (12%), constipation (12%), nausea (12%), pyrexia (11%), anemia (11%) and leukopenia (11%). Of these, ≥ grade 3 events included neutropenia (10%), leukopenia (6%), anemia (5%) and fatigue (1%). Grade 3 or greater thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia were reported in 6% and 4% of pts, respectively. The most common infectious events were upper respiratory tract infections (7% of pts), all of which were grade 1–2 events. In total, 13 pts died during the study; 3 pts died during the treatment period and 10 pts died during post-treatment follow up (until 24 months from study start). Deaths were due to disease progression (n=10), sepsis (n=1), circulatory collapse (no further details; n=1) and multi-organ failure (n=1). Conclusions: Single-agent ofatumumab was well tolerated with an ORR of 11% in heavily pretreated pts with relapsed or progressive DLBCL, nearly all of whom had received prior rituximab therapy. Response to last systemic treatment appeared to influence response to ofatumumab in this pt population. Further studies of ofatumumab in combination with chemotherapy in relapsed DLBCL are currently underway. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Ofatumumab is an investigational anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, currently under development for the treatment of B-cell malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia and follicular lymphoma) as well as autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis). Davies:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Padmanabhan:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gupta:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Lin:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Employment. Davis:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Losic:Genmab A/S: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lisby:Genmab A/S: Employment. Radford:GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership; Genmab: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Protein Profiling of B-Cell Lymphomas Using Tissue Biopsies: A Potential Tool for Small Samples in Pathology

2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-38
Author(s):  
Corine Jansen ◽  
Konnie M. Hebeda ◽  
Marianne Linkels ◽  
Johanna M. M. Grefte ◽  
John M. M. Raemaekers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Protein Profiling ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Large B Cell

Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma comprises many related but distinct diseases and diagnosis and classification is complex. Protein profiling of lymphoma biopsies may be of potential value for use in this lymphoma classification and the discovery of novel markers. In this study, we have optimized a method for SELDI-TOF MS based protein profiling of frozen tissue sections, without dissection of tumour cells. First we have compared chip surfaces and lysis buffers. Also, we have determined the minimal input using laser dissection microscopy. Subsequently, we have analyzed and compared protein profiles of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=8), follicular lymphoma (n=8) and mantle cell lymphoma (n=8). Benign, reactive lymph nodes (n=14) were used as a reference group.CM10 chip surface in combination with urea lysis buffer and an input of approximately 50,000 lymphocytes allowed the detection of many differential peaks. Identification of the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cases was reliably made in the supervised classification. Unsupervised clustering showed segregation into a benign/indolent cluster predominantly formed by benign, reactive lymph nodes and follicular lymphoma cases and into a more aggressive cluster formed by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma cases. In conclusion, our protocol enables protein profiling of protein lysates derived from small histological samples and the subsequent detection of many differentially expressed proteins, without the need of tumour cell dissection. These results support further evaluation of protein profiling of small lymphoma biopsies as an additional tool in pathology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document