Bortezomib Added to the Standard Mobilization Regimen of G-CSF and High-Dose Cyclophosphamide Is a Safe and Effective Combination for a High Yield Stem Cell Collection While Promoting Further Tumor Mass Reduction in Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2953-2953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Stern ◽  
Brian Di Carlo ◽  
Michael W. Schuster ◽  
Tsiporah B. Shore ◽  
John G. Harpel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Standard stem cell mobilization regimens for multiple myeloma patients include G-CSF alone or in combination with high dose cyclophosphamide. Given the known in vitro and in vivo synergy between alkylating agents and proteosome inhibitors, we sought to optimize the potential for concurrent cytoreduction by adding bortezomib to the mobilization regimen. Five evaluable patients, whose prior therapy consisted of six cycles of a 21-day treatment with bortezomib/dexamethasone +/− pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, were mobilized. They received IV push bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in combination with high-dose cyclophosphamide at 3mg/m2 and MESNA on day 8. G-CSF was given for 10 consecutive days starting on day 9. One patient began this regimen in nCR, two were in PR, and two were in CR by urine and serum immunofixation and bone marrow evaluation. Stem cells were easily harvested from each of the five patients. The number of CD34+ cells collected far exceeded the amount normally mobilized with cyclophosphamide and/or G-CSF alone, with four out of 5 patients collected in a single day. The two patients who began the mobilization cycle in PR continued to respond positively. Their protein levels dropped an additional 8.9 and 14.6 percent respectively during the last cycle. The patient who began mobilization in nCR achieved a CR by the end of treatment. Some expected toxicities associated with high dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF occurred. All patients experienced grade 3 and 4 cytopenias, however, they recovered and were able to continue on to transplant. Serious adverse events of grade 3 chest pain (non-cardiac), grade 4 pneumonia, and grade 4 febrile neutropenia also occurred. Bortezomib in addition to high dose cyclophosphamide followed by G-CSF is a novel, well-tolerated and efficacious combination for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. This regimen not only yields a high number of stem cells within a short collection time, but may further cytoreduce disease as well. Stem Cell Collection Patients Days Required for Collection CD34+ Stem Cells (million/kg) 1 1 21.2 2 1 47.4 3 1 22 4 1 17.9 5 4 40.6

Stem Cell Mobilization after Various Induction Regimens in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5433-5433
Author(s):  
Jakub Radocha ◽  
Vladimir Maisnar ◽  
Miriam Lanska ◽  
Jiri Hanousek ◽  
Katerina Machalkova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Stem cell mobilization after various induction regimens in patients with multiple myeloma Introduction: Rapid development of novel therapies for multiple myeloma has led to a significant improvement in response to the treatment. Stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation is a source of considerable costs of transplant procedure. Whether modern induction regimens affect outcome of stem cell mobilization has not been extensively studied. Aim: The goal of this study was to compare efficacy of stem cell mobilization after different induction regimens in patients with multiple myeloma. The primary goal was to compare CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone), CVD (cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone) and VTD (bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone) and regimens in terms of succesful stem cell collection. Methods: All patients with multiple myeloma who have been planned for stem cell collection and were treated with one of the above mentioned regimens were included in this retrospective analysis. The demographic data, amount of stem cells collected, number of days needed to reach the target collection were recorded. All patients received high dose cyclophosphamide 2,5 g/m2 prior to stem cell collection and were primed with G-CSF twice daily from day 5. The collection was started at day 10. Collection goal was 8x106/kg CD34+ cells. Results: 15 patients received CTD, 25 patients CVD and 16 patients VTD regimen before stem cell collection. Groups were comparable according to age, gender and myeloma stages. Mean collected cells at the end of collection were 9.2 (SD 2.8) for CTD, 12.3 (SD 5.6) for CVD and 10.1 (SD 2.1) for VTD (p=0.066). Mean daily harvest was 3.4, 8.0 and 7.6 x106/kg respectively (p=0.01). Mean days needed to reach desired harvest were 3, 2.25 and 1.6 days (p=0.001). No collection failure was observed. Conclusion: The best collection results were seen in patients after induction with CVD or VTD regimen. VTD regimen also required the least days for collection and seems to be most beneficial for cost of collection. CTD regimen shows the least efficacy in stem cell collection before autologous transplantation. All patients managed to harvest for at least one stem cell transplant. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Plerixafor and G-CSF Versus Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF for Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2146-2146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aziz Nazha ◽  
Rachel Cook ◽  
Dan T. Vogl ◽  
Patricia A. Mangan ◽  
Kimberly Hummel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Incomplete Data ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Abstract 2146 Poster Board II-123 Introduction: High dose melphalan and autologus stem cell transplant remains an effective treatment for patients with either early or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Collection of sufficient numbers of stem cells for more than one transplant is optimal. G-CSF with chemotherapy, particularly cyclophosphamide (CY/G-CSF), has been a widely used and effective regimen for stem cell collection in MM. Plerixafor, a CXCR4 antagonist, when combined with G-CSF has been shown in a large randomized clinical trial to be superior to G-CSF alone. A comparison of plerixifor/G-CSF to CY/G-CSF is presented here. Materials and Methods: We performed a single institution retrospective analysis of 365 patients with MM who underwent stem cell mobilization and harvest at the University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center from January 2002 to December 2007. All patients were harvested early in the course of their disease. 76 patients were excluded from this analysis (23 had incomplete data on induction regimen, 19 had incomplete data on stem cell collection, 16 had incomplete data on mobilization regimen, 10 underwent allogeneic transplants, 2 had bone marrow rather than peripheral blood harvests, 2 had stem cells collected at an outside institution, 2 had chemotherapy mobilization other than CY and 2 had medical complications prior to harvest and after mobilization). Therefore, 289 patients were included in the analysis; 16 received plerixafor/G-CSF, 198 received CY/G-CSF, and 75 received G-CSF alone. Results: The median number of collected stem cells was 7.95 × 106 CD34+/kg in plerixafor/G-CSF group, 7.7 × 106 CD34+/kg in Cy/G-CSF group and 4.5 × 106 CD34+/kg in G-CSF alone group. The median number of apheresis days was 2 days, 2 days and 4 days respectively. The percentage of the patients who collected ≥ 6 × 106 CD34+/kg in < 3 apheresis was 63% (10/16), 62% (123/198) and 19% (14/75) respectively. The percentage of the patients who collected ≥ 6 × 106CD34+/kg <5 apheresis was 81% (13/16), 69% (136/198) and 23% (17/75) respectively. The mean CD34+/kg collected erither after CY/G-CSF or plerixafor/G-CSF was higher than G-CSF alone (p<0.0001 for each analysis). Conclusion: This analysis suggests that plerixafor/G-CSF and CY/G-CSF mobilization result in similar and adequate stem cell harvest numbers for autologous stem cell transplantation for MM. Both approaches are superior to G-CSF alone. The choice of plerixafor/G-CSF vs CY/G-CSF for stem cell mobilization will therefore depend on further analysis of the relative costs, toxicities and long term outcome of these regimens. Disclosures: Stadtmauer: genzyme: Consultancy.

Combination High-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Bortezomib Is Safe and Effective for Stem Cell Harvesting in Chemotherapy Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5459-5459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Katzman ◽  
Theresa George ◽  
Heather Doell ◽  
Patricia Danyluk ◽  
Sheri Briggs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Harvesting ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cell Harvest

Abstract Introduction: High-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation is the accepted therapy for most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) following steroid-based induction therapy. In a significant proportion of patients, however, the disease is refractory to standard induction. The use of dose-intense combination chemotherapy, such as D-PACE (dexamethasone, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and cisplatin), may affect the ability to harvest an adequate number of hematopoeitic stem cells prior to transplantation. In addition, in those patients not achieving adequate cytoreduction despite combination chemotherapy, there is a theoretical risk of stem cell product contamination by malignant plasma cells. Bortezomib is a therapeutic agent with a novel mechanism of action, which in preliminary studies appears to be synergistic to alkylating agents and does not appear to affect stem cell yield. We piloted the addition of bortezomib to high-dose cyclophosphamide during stem cell harvesting in a series of patients failing to achieve an adequate response to D-PACE salvage. Patients and Methods: Between 2002 and 2006, fifteen MM patients refractory to standard dexamethasone-based induction therapy received ≥ 2 cycles of D-PACE prior to proceeding to autologous stem cell harvest and transplantation. 7/15 patients achieved adequate cytoreduction and proceeded to high-dose cyclophosphamide (3 g/m2) and filgrastim plus ancestim stimulation for stem cell mobilization. However, 8 patients in this cohort did not achieve adequate disease cytoreduction following D-PACE. Therefore, bortezomib was added to the mobilization regimen on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, in addition to high-dose cyclophosphamide given on day 11. Identical growth factor stimulation was provided. Response assessment included days to stem cell harvest, number of CD34 cells harvested, plasma cells in the product, disease response, and hematologic parameters. Results: Pre-treatment toxicities from D-PACE were similar in both groups. The addition of bortezomib to cyclophosphamide during stem cell mobilization did not lead to increased symptomatic toxicity. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 5/8 patients receiving combination bortezomib/cyclophosphamide. No episodes of significant bleeding, peripheral neuropathy, or skin rash were noted. The average CD34-positive stem cell harvest in both groups was >5.0 × 106/kg. Time to stem cell harvesting was not significantly different between the groups. Flow cytometric examination of the harvested product from the bortezomib/cyclophosphamide group consistently demonstrated <2% cells bearing plasma cell markers. One patient in each group failed to mobilize sufficient stem cells. Bone marrow plasmacyte counts following combination therapy and harvesting decreased in all assessed patients. Time to engraftment was similar in both groups. Post-transplant disease control and survival remains to be assessed, as some patients in the combination group have only recently undergone transplantation. Conclusion: The addition of bortezomib to high-dose cyclophosphamide during stem cell mobilization does not increase toxicity or decrease stem cell harvest yield or quality, and appears to achieve adequate disease reduction in patients otherwise refractory to combination chemotherapy. This may result in improved relapse-free survival in patients with refractory MM.

Cyclophosphamide Overcomes the Suppressive Effect of LenalidomideTherapy on Stem Cell Collection in Preparation for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3024-3024
Author(s):  
Tomer Mark ◽  
David Jayabalan ◽  
Roger N. Pearse ◽  
Jessica Stern ◽  
Jessica Furst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Multiple Myeloma (MM) therapy has evolved over recent years to include powerful new therapeutic agents. The goal for most patients with MM, however, still remains high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantations as this procedure has been proven to have a therapeutic benefit. Therefore, the selection of an induction therapy must take into consideration the potential impact on the ability to collect enough stem cells for future transplantation. Recent studies have discussed difficulty in collecting stem cells in patients receiving lenalidomide-based induction therapy using filgastrim (G-CSF) in preparation for autologous stem cell transplantation in MM. It also has been recommended that the duration of lenalidomide induction therapy be limited to 4–6 cycles, since longer treatment time can hinder collection yields. We sought to determine if the addition of cyclophosphamide (CTX) to G-CSF as a mobilization regimen could rescue the ability to collect adequate stem cells for at least two autologous stem cell transplants for patients who had induction therapy with the BiRD (Biaxin® [clarithromycin]/Revlimid® [lenalidomide]/dexamethasone) regimen. BiRD therapy is as follows for each 28-day cycle: Clarithromycin 500mg po BID for days 1–28, Lenalidomide 25mg po daily for days 1–21, and Dexamethasone 40mg po weekly on days 1, 8, 15, and 21. All patients had either Stage II or III MM by Salmon-Durie criteria and were treatment naïve. Patients were advised to undergo stem cell collection after either maximum disease response or disease plateau had been achieved. Prior to stem cell mobilization, BiRD therapy was held for a minimum of 14 days. Stem cell collection was performed after either G-CSF alone at a dose 10 mcg/kg/day for 5–10 consecutive days until a total of 10 × 106/kg CD34+ stem cells had been collected or with the addition of cyclophosphamide (CTX) at a dose of 3g/m2 once prior to the initiation of G-CSF therapy. A total of 28 patients underwent stem cell collection. Stem cell mobilization was attempted with G-CSF alone in 9 instances and with CTX+G-CSF in 20 instances (1 patient underwent mobilization with both G-CSF alone and CTX+G-CSF). In comparison to the G-CSF monotherapy, CTX+G-CSF yielded a significantly greater stem cell collection (mean CD34+ cells collected: 3.78 × 106/kg vs. 32.33 × 106/kg, P < 0.0001). Only 33% of patients who attempted stem cell mobilization with G-CSF alone obtained sufficient CD34+ cell yield vs. 100% of the patients mobilized with CTX+G-CSF (P < 0.0001). The extent of BiRD therapy prior to stem cell mobilization ranged from 2–27 cycles. The number of cycles of BiRD did not significantly impact the success rate of stem cell collection (P = 0.14). In conclusion, the patients mobilized with CTX+G-CSF had a higher number of CD34+ cells collected and were all able collect enough stem cells for two autologous transplants. There was no association with the duration of BiRD therapy and successful CD34+ cell collection. We therefore recommend continuing lenalidomide-based induction therapy until desired tumor reduction goal is achieved and using the CTX in addition to G-CSF to ensure successful stem cell harvest prior to autologous transplantation.

scholarly journals Delayed Neutrophil Engraftment in Patients Receiving Daratumumab As Part of Their First Induction Regimen for Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4505-4505
Author(s):  
Abdullah S. Al Saleh ◽  
M Hasib Sidiqi ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Eli Muchtar ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Stem Cell Collection ◽  
Neutrophil Engraftment

Introduction: Daratumumab is a human immunoglobulin (IgG-κ) that targets CD38 abundantly expressed on plasma cells. Data is emerging to show its efficacy as part of induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Hematopoietic stem cells have been shown to express CD38 on the cell surface and therefore during mobilization, there is a theoretical risk of circulating daratumumab binding to and having downstream effects on these cells. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of MM patients treated with daratumumab prior to stem cell collection and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) to identify any effects daratumumab therapy may have on the efficacy of the stem cells in bone marrow recovery. The study was conducted at Mayo Clinic Rochester from February 2018 to May 2019. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was the preferred agent used for stem cell mobilization and plerixafor was added in a demand-adapted fashion. All patients received melphalan infused at day -1 before their ASCT and the decision about dosing (200mg/m2 vs 140mg/m2) was at the physicians' discretion. Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first date of three consecutive neutrophil counts >0.5 x 10^9/L and platelet engraftment was defined as the first date of three consecutive platelet counts >50 x 10^9/L in the absence of platelet transfusion in the preceding 7 days. Results: We identified 12 patients who received daratumumab as part of their first induction regimen (daratumumab cohort) and compared them to 129 patients who did not receive daratumumab prior to stem cell mobilization and transplant during the study period (no daratumumab cohort). Of the daratumumab cohort, 11 patients received daratumumab, ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone and one received daratumumab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone. No differences were noted in terms of melphalan dose or the number of CD34+ stem cell infused. The median time from the last dose of daratumumab to stem cell collection was 3.9 weeks. In patients receiving daratumumab, the median time for neutrophil engraftment was three days longer compared with those who did not receive daratumumab (median of 19 days vs. 16 days, P=0.017) (Figure 1, A). Median platelet engraftment was delayed by one day, although this was not statistically significant (median of 18 days vs. 17 days, p=0.12) (Figure 1, B). A total of 6 patients (50%) from the daratumumab cohort and 52 (40%) from the no daratumumab cohort required hospital admission. Of these admissions, there was no difference between the two groups in rates of admission for fever (50% in the daratumumab group vs. 42% in the no daratumumab group, P=0.7). Conclusion: Our case series provides the first report of daratumumab delaying engraftment post transplant in myeloma patients receiving it prior to stem cell collection. A better characterization of this phenomenon is important given the increasing use of daratumumab as front line therapy prior to ASCT in patients with myeloma. Disclosures Gertz: Prothena: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Spectrum: Honoraria, Research Funding; Alnylam: Honoraria; Ionis: Honoraria. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Kapoor:Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Dispenzieri:Alnylam: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Akcea: Consultancy. Dingli:alexion: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding.

Fractionated High-Dose Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF: An Extremely Effective Chemo-Mobilization Modality In Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4521-4521
Author(s):  
Ahmad Antar ◽  
Zaher K. Otrock ◽  
Nadim El Majzoub ◽  
Nabila Kreidieh ◽  
Muhammad Muhammad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Background The optimal stem cell mobilization regimen for multiple myeloma (MM) is undefined. Most centers use either granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone (steady state strategy) or cyclophosphamide (CY) followed by G-CSF (chemo-mobilizing strategy). However, the impact of CY dose on stem cell yield and subsequent engraftment, and toxicity is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed our experience using fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF as our preferred chemo-mobilization strategy in MM patients (pts) and its impact on the mobilization outcomes, engraftment and the observed toxicity. Methods Between 01/2000 and 12/2012, 220 chemo-mobilization attempts were undertaken. Among these, 62 pts (M=37, F=25) had MM (1st-line=54, relapsed=8) and all received high-dose CY and G-CSF. Median age was 56 (37-75) yrs. ISS stage was I (n=34), II (n=16), and III (n=12). Pre-transplant induction consisted of VAD or VAD-like chemotherapy (n=26), bortezomib(bor)/dexamethasone (dex) (n=15), thalidomide (thal) /dex (n=10), bor/thal/dex (n=10), and 1 received bor/lenalidomide/dex. Fifty-six received fractionated high-dose CY (5g/m2 divided in 5 doses of 1g/m2 q 3 hrs) whereas 6 received CY 50 mg/kg for 2 doses. G-CSF was given at a fixed dose of 300 µg SQ q 12 hrs. Results All 62 (100%) pts achieved a circulating CD34 count ≥20/µl which is the cut-off level at our center to proceed with apheresis. The median peak peripheral blood CD34+ cell count was 111.5 (21-575) cells/μL. Success rate of stem-cell mobilization defined as collection of more than 2x106 CD34+ cells/kg was 100%. Median stem cell collection yield was 15.9x106 CD34+ cells/kg. Moreover, 61 (98.4%) pts and 46 (74%) pts collected >5x106 and >10x106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively. Only 4 (6.4%) pts required 2 apheresis sessions. Conversely, 40 (64.5%) pts required hospitalization for febrile neutropenia (n=38) or transfusion support (n=2) for a median of 4 (1-8) days. No one required intensive level of care and all recovered. Also, 17 (27.4%) pts required blood transfusions and 16 (25.8%) required platelets transfusion. Autografting was successfully performed in all pts using high-dose melphalan with a median time from mobilization to the first transplant of 31 (16-156) days and median infused CD34+ cells of 7x106/kg (3.1-15.3). All pts achieved successful hematologic engraftment with a median time for neutrophil engraftment (ANC ≥500/µL) of 11 days and platelet engraftment (platelet ≥20000/microliter) of 12 days. Conclusion Fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF is a highly effective chemo-mobilization strategy in MM in terms of successful rate of mobilization (100%), efficiency of stem cell collection (high yield), and timely hematologic engraftment (100%). However, the relatively high-rate of hospitalizations for febrile neutropenia requires an assessment of its cost-efficiency as compared to new mobilization strategies using G-CSF and preemptive plerixafor. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The Combination of 2-CDA and Rituximab in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): A Prospective Multicenter Phase II Trial (SAKK 34/02).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2057-2057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Leupin ◽  
Jan C. Schuller ◽  
Max Solenthaler ◽  
Andre Tichelli ◽  
Alois Gratwohl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Partial Remission ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: This trial aimed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of an induction immunochemotherapy consisting of rituximab and cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine, 2-CDA) in patients (pts) suffering from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Methods: Inclusion criteria were CLL at first diagnosis or after one treatment with alkylating agents. The regimen consisted of four remission induction cycles. In cycle 1, 2-CDA (0.1 mg/kg/day) was administered for 5 days. In cycles 2-4, Rituximab (375 mg/m^2) was given on day 1 followed by 2-CDA (0.1 mg/kg body weight), in intervals of 28 days. Responding pts (complete remission (CR), very good partial remission (VGPR) or nodular partial remission (NPR)) underwent stem cell mobilization chemotherapy with Cyclophosphamide (4g/m^2 on day 2) G-CSF (10 microgram/kg s.c. daily, from day 4 on), and Rituximab (375 mg/m^2) on day 1 and 8 as in vivo purging. If no CR, VGPR or NPR was achieved, up to 4 cycles CHOP were administered. Primary endpoint was CR, secondary endpoints were VGPR, NPR and toxicity after induction and feasibility of stem cell mobilization. For response evaluation, staging procedures included clinical examination as well as bone marrow biopsies and CT-scans. A total of 41 pts was planned using Simon’s two-stage design with 5% significance and 80% power for the null hypothesis of CR rate &lt; 25% and the alternative hypothesis of CR rate &gt; 45%. Results: 42 pts were included, median age 53.8 y (range 38 – 65), WHO performance status 0 in 33 pts and 1 in 9 pts, stage Binet B in 20 pts, Binet C in 8 pts and progressive A in 14 pts. 2 pts were not evaluable for response. 9 pts reached CR (22.5%, 95% CI: 11–38%). Overall response rate including 15 VGPR and 2 NPR was 65% (CI: 48–79%). Of the 14 non-responders, 8 underwent CHOP treatment of which 2 achieved VGPR. 20 patients underwent mobilization and 8 pts refused further protocol treatment. 14 pts had leucapheresis. Stem cell harvest was feasible in 7 pts, all with &#8805; 2×10^6 cells/kg. Fever and infection were reported respectively in 13 and 9 pts. Infusion related adverse events of Rituximab were moderate and occurred mainly after the first infusion. 42 of 158 cycles (27%) were associated with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 6 of 158 cycles (4%) with grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: Although the expected CR rate was not achieved, a combination of Rituximab and 2-CDA is an effective and well tolerated treatment.

A Comparison of Chemotherapy + G-CSF Versus Plerixafor (Mozobil®) + G-CSF for Stem Cell Mobilization In Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Lenalidomide

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2258-2258
Author(s):  
Tomer M Mark ◽  
Adriana C Rossi ◽  
Roger N Pearse ◽  
Morton Coleman ◽  
David Bernstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Yield ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Abstract 2258 Background: Prior use of lenalidomide beyond 6 cycles of therapy in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to negatively impact stem cell yield, but this phenomenon can be overcome with the addition of high-dose cyclophosphamide to standard G-CSF mobilization. We hypothesized that the use of plerixafor (Mozobil®) would compare similarly to chemotherapy in rescuing the ability to collect stem cells in lenalidomide-treated myeloma. Methods: We performed a retrospective study comparing the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization (PG) to chemotherapy + G-CSF (CG) (either high-dose cyclophosphamide at 3g/m2 or DCEP [4-day infusional dexamethasone/ cyclophosphamide/ etoposide/cisplatin]) in 49 consecutive stem cell collection attempts in patients with MM exposed to prior lenalidomide. The primary endpoint was the ability to collect sufficient stem cells for at least two transplants (minimum 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg), comparing results in terms of total exposure to lenalidomide and time elapsed from lenalidomide exposure until the mobilization attempt. The secondary endpoint was number of apheresis days required to meet collection goal. Resilts: Twenty-four patients underwent PG mobilization and twenty-five with CG (21 with G-CSF + cyclophosphamide, 4 with G-CSF+DCEP). The two groups did not differ in terms of total amount of lenalidomide exposure: median number of lenalidomide cycles for patients mobilized with PG was 6.5 (range 1.2–86.6), vs. 6 (range 2–21.6), for patients mobilized with CG (P = 0.663). The median time between mobilization and last lenalidomide dose was also similar between the two groups: 57.5 (range 12–462) days for PG vs. 154 (range 27–805) days for CG (P = 0.101). There was an equivalent rate of successful collection of 100% for PG and 96% for CG, P = 0.322. One patient failed collection in the CG group due to emergent hospitalization for septic shock during a period of neutropenia; no patient collected with PG had a serious adverse event that interrupted the collection process. Stem cell yield did not differ between the two arms (13.9 vs. 18.8 × 106 million CD34+ cells/kg for PG vs. CG respectively, P = 0.083). Average time to collection goal was also equal, with a median of time of 1 day required in both groups, (range 1–2 days for PG, 1–5 days for CG, P = 0.073). There was no relationship between amount of lenalidomide exposure and stem cell yield with either PG (P = 0.243) or CG (P = 0.867). Conclusion: A plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization schedule is equivalent in efficacy to chemotherapy + G-CSF in obtaining adequate numbers of stem cells for two autologous stem cell transplants in patients with MM exposed to lenalidomide; however, PG may be a less toxic approach than chemomobilization. Number of lenalidomide cycles has no impact on chances of stem cell collection success using either method. Disclosures: Mark: Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau; Millenium Corp: Speakers Bureau. Zafar: Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document