Clinical Outcomes of Off-Label Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII (rFVIIa) at Teaching Hospitals Affiliated with a Medical School.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4033-4033
Author(s):  
Yijun Cheng ◽  
Melissa S. Baxter ◽  
Walter S. Schroeder ◽  
Zale P. Bernstein

Abstract BACKGROUND: Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), NovoSeven®, is currently licensed in the United States for treatment of bleeding in hemophilia patients with acquired coagulation factor inhibitors. The off-label uses of this medication have expanded dramatically in past few years. Here we report our experience with the off-label use of rFVIIa at University at Buffalo affiliated teaching hospitals which include a level III trauma and major cardiothoracic centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical, laboratory, and radiographic data of a consecutive series of 43 patients who received off-label rFVIIa between December 2001 and September 2005. RESULTS: The indications for off-label rFVIIa use included CNS bleeding (17 patients), cardiothoracic and vascular surgery (9 patients), trauma (7 patients), GI bleeding (4 patients), coagulopathy (2 patients) and prophylaxis for surgery (4 patients). The dosage ranged from 32 to 150 mcg/kg with most patients receiving 90 mcg/kg. While a majority of patients received a single dose of rFVIIa (29 patients), one received a total of 22 doses. Overall 21 patients (49%) were alive at discharge. Those patients who received rFVIIa to stop severe bleeding from trauma or surgery appeared to have the worst outcome. The patient who received 22 doses of rFVIIa appeared to derive some clinical benefit after his initial doses, but became non-responsive to additional therapies. Successful hemostasis with rFVIIa was achieved in 100% of patients with preoperative prophylactic use. There were no thromboembolic events attributed to rFVIIa treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of off-label use of rFVIIa appears to correlate with clinical indications, with prophylactic use having greatest benefit and surgical hemorrhage, the worst. Our findings were used to revise guidelines to allow for more efficacious use of off-label rFVIIa.

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2177-2177
Author(s):  
Shveta Gupta ◽  
Joseph R. Stanek ◽  
Sarah H. O'Brien

Background: Recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a hemostatic agent in 1999 for the treatment of patients with hemophilia and inhibitory antibodies against either factor VIII or IX and subsequently approved for use in patients with congenital factor VII deficiency and Glanzmann Thrombasthenia refractory to platelet transfusions in 2005 and 2014 respectively. These are rare disorders and the use of rFVIIa in these conditions has been found to be effective and safe. Despite this very narrow indication for usage, rFVIIa is being used for a diverse range of off-label indications. Along with uncertainty regarding clinical efficacy, available data suggests that the risk of thromboembolic events is increased when rFVIIa is used in off-label settings. Studies on the off-label use of rFVIIa in children are limited to a few large case series. In a retrospective multicenter cohort study utilizing the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) administrative database, Witmer et al demonstrated a 10-fold increase in the annual rate of off-label admissions from 2000 to 2007. The mortality rate in the off-label group was 34% and thrombotic events occurred in 11% of the off-label admissions. We conducted a follow up study to characterize the evolution of the off-label use of rFVIIa in children. Objective: To describe current trends of off-label utilization and adverse effects of rFVIIa in children. Study design: A retrospective multicenter cohort study utilizing the PHIS administrative database was conducted. The PHIS dataset includes 51 children's hospitals in the United States and is representative of tertiary care centers in the nation. In patients, 18 years of age or younger who received rFVIIa between 2012-2018 were included. A label admission was defined as an admission with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 and ICD-10) diagnostic code for hemophilia, Factor VII deficiency or Glanzmann thrombaesthenia; admissions without these codes were classified as off-label. Data were analyzed descriptively. Results: There were 7,738 number of admissions, representing 6,493 unique individual subjects. A total of 78.3 % of the admissions were off-label. The rate of off-label use was stable at approximately 80% of the admissions from 2012-18. The most frequent admitting services for the off-label admissions included cardiology (29.8%), cardiovascular/thoracic surgery (15.7%), critical care (15.0%), neonatal-perinatal medicine (8.7%), and hematology/oncology (6.1%). Over half (54.6%) of off-label administration occurred in children younger than 1 year old. Among the off-label admissions 57 % were male and the median days of use of rFVIIa was 1 day. The mortality rate in the off-label group was 22.3 %. Thrombotic events occurred in 11.4% of the off-label admissions. Among the off-label admissions with thrombotic events, the most common admitting services were cardiology (35.0%) and critical care (21.2%). Conclusion: We have demonstrated that on a per admission basis the predominant use of rFVIIa is off-label. Thrombotic events are common. Although the mortality rate in the pediatric patients who received off-label rFVIIa is high; its lower when compared with the previous review. This may likely reflect, in part, the severity of illness in this patient group. In the absence of clearly supportive data demonstrating safety and efficacy, restraint should be exercised with careful consideration of risk versus benefit for use of rFVIIa in off-label settings. Disclosures Gupta: Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Takeda-Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. O'Brien:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a hemostatic agent in 1999 for the treatment of patients with hemophilia and inhibitory antibodies against either factor VIII or IX and subsequently approved for use in patients with congenital factor VII deficiency and Glanzmann Thrombasthenia refractory to platelet transfusions in 2005 and 2014 respectively. These are rare disorders and the use of rFVIIa in these conditions has been found to be effective and safe. Despite this very narrow indication for usage, rFVIIa is being used for a diverse range of off-label indications.


2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. C. Alexander ◽  
S. A. Gallagher ◽  
A. Mascola ◽  
R. M. Moloney ◽  
R. S. Stafford

SpringerPlus ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Hamel ◽  
Douglas S McNair ◽  
Nicholas J Birkett ◽  
Donald R Mattison ◽  
Anthony Krantis ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-183
Author(s):  
Zaida Rahman ◽  
Asadul Mazid Helali

Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) is the agent most commonly used for treatment of eclampsia and prevention of eclampsia in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. Another commonly practiced offlabel use of this drug is in preventing preterm labor in pregnant women where the duration of the treatment might be more than one week. It is usually given either by intramuscular or intravenous route. After administration, about 40% of plasma magnesium is bound with protein. The unbound magnesium ion diffuses into the extravascular extracellular space and then diffuses into bone. It also crosses the placenta and fetal membranes and then diffuses into the fetus and amniotic fluid. Magnesium is almost exclusively excreted in the urine; 90% of the dose is excreted during the first 24 hours after an intravenous infusion of MgSO4. The clinical effect and toxicity of MgSO4 can be linked to its concentration in plasma. A concentration of 1.8–3.0 mmol/L has been suggested for treatment of eclampsia. The actual magnesium dose and concentration needed for prophylaxis have never been estimated. Maternal toxicity is rare when MgSO4 is carefully administered and monitored. Deep tendon reflexes, respiratory rate, urine output and serum concentrations are the most common variables for monitoring the toxic effect. Currently the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is advising health care professionals against using MgSO4 injection for more than 5–7 days to stop preterm labor in pregnant women (off-label use). Administration of MgSO4 injection to pregnant women for more than 5–7 days may lead to low calcium levels and bone problems in the fetus, including osteopenia and fractures. The harmful effect in the fetus with the shortest duration is not established. In light of this new safety information, the drug label for MgSO4 injection, USP 50% has also been changed, including changing the pregnancy category to D from A and denoting the effect as “New teratogenic effects”. Similarly, the manufacturers of other MgSO4 injection products have made similar changes to their drug labels. In this review, the currently available knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of MgSO4 and its clinical usage for women with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, its off-label use and safety concern regarding the warning announced by the FDA will be outlined. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jemc.v4i3.20957 J Enam Med Col 2014; 4(3): 177-183


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 474-481
Author(s):  
Mary Carmack ◽  
Charles Berde ◽  
Michael C. Monuteaux ◽  
Shannon Manzi ◽  
Florence T. Bourgeois

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18016-e18016
Author(s):  
Yan Xing ◽  
Ying Xu ◽  
Funda Meric-Bernstam ◽  
Jenny Chee Ning Chang ◽  
Ya-Chen T. Shih

e18016 Background: The use of targeted oral cancer medications has increased significantly since 2001. Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor was first approved for cancer treatment by FDA as second line for patients with advanced renal cancer. Subsequently it has been approved for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) in 2011 and breast cancer in 2012 respectively. Off-label use is common in oncology practice. The objective of this study is to assess prescription trends, especially off-label use of everolimus, among non-elderly cancer patients with private insurance in the United States from 2009 to 2014. Methods: Data from the MarketScan database were analyzed. Between 2009 to 2014, 4,728 cancer patients with at least one everolimus prescription were included in the analyses. The diagnosis which incurred the most recently to the initial everolimus use in each calendar year was recorded. Off-label use was defined as using everolimus by all of the cancer types except of renal cancer in 2009-2014, NET in 2011-2014 and breast cancer in 2012-2014. Results: The number of patients received everolimus has increased significantly from 243 in 2009 to 1,194 in 2014. The most common diagnoses associated with everolimus use were breast cancer (42%), followed by renal cancer (24%), and NET (7%). Off-label use of everolimus increased from 29% in 2009 to 47% in 2011 then decreased to 23% in 2014. The 3 most common diagnoses associated with off-label use of everolimus were secondary malignancies (30.7%), breast cancer (10.4%) and liver cancer (5%) in 2009-2011, compared to secondary malignancies (47.3%), brain cancer (4.2%) and lung cancer (3.9%) in 2012-2014. The off-label use in female has decreased significantly from 32% in 2009 to 19% in 2014 (p = 0.03). There was no statistical difference in off-label use of everolimus by geographic region. Conclusions: Analyses of MarketScan data suggest off-label use of everolimus is common among US cancer patients, especially in lung, liver and brain cancer and secondary malignancies after the approved indication was expanded to breast cancer in 2012. Further research of the factors associated with off-label use of everolimus and its economic implication is needed.


2021 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00918
Author(s):  
Soledad Jorge ◽  
Barbara A. Goff ◽  
Heidi J. Gray ◽  
Daniel A. Enquobahrie ◽  
Kemi M. Doll

PURPOSE: To quantify early dissemination patterns, factors influencing use, and costs of bevacizumab (BEV) for the treatment of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer (OC) in the United States before its regulatory approval for this indication (off-label use). METHODS: We identified women 18-65 years of age with newly diagnosed OC treated with surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy from 2008 to 2016 through the MarketScan database (N = 8,109). The proportion of women receiving BEV over time was calculated, multivariate logistic regression used to determine factors associated with BEV use, and total costs per cycle of chemotherapy with and without BEV abstracted. RESULTS: BEV utilization rose 1.8-fold during the study period, from 4.1% (2008) to 7.4 % (2016). BEV was used with non–platinum/taxane regimens over a third of the time (37.2%). Physician specialty (medical oncology v gyn oncology) and geography (southeast region) were significantly associated with higher rates of use. Clinical factors associated with BEV use were metastatic disease and presence of ascites. The median cost of one cycle of platinum/taxane chemotherapy plus BEV was $10,897 in US dollars (USD) (interquartile range $7,573-$18,133 USD), compared with $1,629 USD (interquartile range, $683.0-$4,461 USD) for platinum/taxane alone. CONCLUSION: Off-label use of BEV for newly diagnosed OC was rare (< 10%), but doubled following presentation of phase II and III data at international meetings. Both clinical (ascites, metastatic disease, and age) and nonclinical (specialty and region) factors were associated with BEV use, and its use was accompanied by a six-fold increase in the cost of one cycle of treatment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel A. Lardizabal ◽  
Conrad J. Macon ◽  
Brian P. O'Neill ◽  
Vikas Singh ◽  
Claudia A. Martinez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document