Treatment of Severe Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2249-2249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor B Resnick ◽  
Polina Stepensky ◽  
Michael Y. Shapira ◽  
Claudine Barkatz ◽  
Gregory Elkin ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2249 Poster Board II-226 BACKGROUND. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is being used to treat a range malignant and nonmalignant conditions. However, it often causes potentially lethal Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD). Several studies revealed that mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) from human bone marrow can down regulate GVHD after HSCT. METHODS. MSCs were obtained from BM, expanded and characterized by their morphology, immunophenotype, immunosuppressive potential for autologous, partially and fully mismatched lymphocytes. Twenty five patients (pts) got 39 (range, 1 to 4) MSCs infusions for 27 episodes of acute GVHD, which was defined as steroid resistant grade IV aGVHD in all but one patient. RESULTS. GvHD characteristics. Acute GVHD started from day +6 to d +46 from HSCT (median d+18) excluding single pt in whom it occurred on d+150. In 2 pts disease manifested in a hyper acute form before the engraftment (on d+6 and d+8, respectively). In all but one pt GI GVHD was defined as grade IV with full clinical picture of it. Skin GVHD accompanied GI symptoms in 17 pts and 13 was > grade II, in 4 grade IV. Liver symptoms presented in 13 pts, one pt was determinate as VOD. In 3 pts liver involvement was defined as grade IV. In all 24 of 25 pts had GVHD grade IV 4 and one grade III. Previous conventional anti GVHD therapies included: MP in all pts, MTX, various calcineurin inhibitors, MMF, ECP, serotherapy. Only 3 pts showed temporary limited partial response. Treatment with MSCs. The 1st infusion with MSC was given on day +32.5 (range, 8 to 74); d+50 (range, +28 to +180) post diagnosis of aGVHD and HSCT HSCT, respectively. In 22 evaluable pts we treated 24 separate episodes of GVHD: 22 first episodes and in 2 pts relapse of GVHD. In 24 of 39 cases treatment was performed with frozen MSC and in 15 with fresh cultured cells. In 37/39 cases passages 1 to 3 were used. Median number of infused cells was 1 (range, 0.3 to 3.1) x10 6 per kg of pt body weight in each treatment. Initial response was seen in 17/24 episodes of aGVHD (70.8%), in 8 partial (PR) and in 9 complete (CR). Two pts experienced GVHD relapse after achieving CR and very good PR: one case was treated successfully while another was resistant to MSCs. The latest pt with grade IV aggressive liver GVHD received MSCs injections intra hepatic arteries under radiological control following IRB approval with no anti GVHD effect. The procedure was uneventful with no evidence of microembolisation, no changes of blood flow or deterioration of liver tests (cytolysis). We observed a trend for better effect with higher MSC cell dose: total and per first infusion MSCs dose (1.93±1.28 vs. 1.23±0.50, p=0.078; 1.28±0.79 vs. 0.88±0.28, p=0.086). In all cases effect was seen after the first procedure. No difference was noted in the anti GVHD activity between fresh vs. frozen MSCs. There were no immediate or late toxicity or side effects. Overall survival. 14/25 patients are alive up to 20 months follow up. 8/11 pts, died from GVHD (4 within 1-10 d from MSCs infusion), and 3 from other unrelated causes including TTP-1, DAH-1 and disease progression-1. CONCLUSION. Treatment with MSCs seems to be a new novel type of therapy for steroids resistant GVHD with promising preliminary results and low toxicity. Obviously multicenter 2 arm randomized study is in need to confirm these encouraging. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kilian Kelly ◽  
John E. J. Rasko

Graft versus host disease (GvHD) is a life-threating complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which is initially treated with high dose corticosteroids. Approximately 50% of acute GvHD cases are resistant to steroid treatment, and two-year mortality rates in those steroid-resistant patients exceed 80%. Chronic GvHD necessitates prolonged corticosteroid use, which is typically associated with limited efficacy and troublesome adverse effects. No agent has yet been established as an optimal second line therapy for either acute or chronic GvHD, but mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have shown substantial promise. MSCs promote an immunosuppressive and immunoregulatory environment via multifactorial mechanisms, including: secretion of proteins/peptides/hormones; transfer of mitochondria; and transfer of exosomes or microvesicles containing RNA and other molecules. A large number of clinical studies have investigated MSCs from various sources as a treatment for acute and/or chronic GvHD. MSCs are generally safe and well tolerated, and most clinical studies have generated encouraging efficacy results, but response rates have varied. Confounding factors include variability in MSC donor types, production methodology and dose regimens, as well as variations in study design. It is well-established that extensive culture expansion of primary donor-derived MSCs leads to marked changes in functionality, and that there is a high level of inter-donor variability in MSC properties. However, recent manufacturing innovations may be capable of overcoming these problems. Further adequately powered prospective studies are required to confirm efficacy and establish the place of MSC therapy in the treatment of this condition.


JBMTCT ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-66
Author(s):  
Vaneuza A. M. Funke ◽  
Maria Claudia Rodrigues Moreira ◽  
Afonso Celso Vigorito

Graft versus host disease is one of the main complications of Hematopoietic stem cell, in­volving about 50% to 80% of the patients. Acute GVHD clinical manifestations and therapy is discussed, as well as new NIH criteria for the diagnosis and classification of chronic GVHD. Therapy for both refractory chronic and acute GVHD is an important field of discussion once there is no superiority for the majority of the agents after primary therapy has failed. Hence, this review is meant to be a useful tool of consultation for clinicians who are dealing with this complex complication.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1993-1993
Author(s):  
Florent Malard ◽  
Faezeh Legrand ◽  
Jérôme Cornillon ◽  
Amandine Le Bourgeois ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Mear ◽  
...  

Introduction Intestinal Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD), following allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT), comes with a high mortality rate and a reduced life-expectancy. In this context, failure to respond to steroid therapy is associated with an absence of further therapeutic options, thereby representing an unmet medical need. A marked reduction in gut microbiota diversity leading to loss of functions was strongly associated with reduced overall survival in GvHD, while a high gut microbiota diversity appears to be protective. Aiming at restoring microbiome functions, Fecal Microbiota Transfer proved to be a promising treatment modality in this challenging clinical situation, with recent studies reporting favorable results in steroid refractory-acute GVHD (SR-aGvHD) patients. Here we report on the use of "MaaT013", a standardized, pooled-donor, high-richness microbiota biotherapeutic, used to treat 8 patients with intestinal-predominant aGvHD. Patients and methods Eight allo-HSCT recipients with steroid-dependent or steroid-refractory gastrointestinal GvHD (classical aGVHD n=3, late-onset aGVHD n=2; aGvHD with overlap syndrome n=3) were treated with the MaaT013 biotherapeutic as part of a compassionate use program. These patients had previously received and failed 1 to 5 lines (median 2.5) of GvHD systemic treatments. MaaT013 microbiota biotherapeutics were provided as a pharmaceutical preparation to hospitals by the developer, "MaaT Pharma". Each patient received 1 to 3 doses (median: 3; total doses administered: 21) of MaaT013, a 150 mL bag, by enema (n=7) or nasogastric tube (n=1). GvHD response was evaluated 7 days after each administration and 28 days after the first dose. Prepared under Good Manufacturing Practices, MaaT013 biotherapeutics are characterized by a highly consistent richness of 455 +/- 3% Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and an Inverse Simpson index greater than 20. Batch release specifications are based on potency (viability), identity (diversity), and purity (microbiological safety testing following regulatory guidelines and proportion of proinflammatory species), ensuring the desired consistency between batches. Results We observed 6/8 positive responses at D28 after first dosing, including 3 Complete Responses (CR), one Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), and 2 Partial Responses (PR). Considering the best GI response achieved, all (8/8) patients experienced at least a PR, with 3 CRs, 2 VGPRs and 3 PRs. The 3 patients with CR were still alive at last follow-up (60 to 192 days after last dosing; median: 115 days) and were able to taper and stop steroids and immunosuppressants without relapse of GI symptoms. Of note, among these 3 patients, mild mouth chronic GvHD symptoms persisted in one patient, and relapse of hematologic malignancy was observed in another patient. Among the 8 treated patients, 5 were still alive at last follow-up (60 to 232 days after last dosing; median: 125 days). The safety of the MaaT013 microbiota biotherapeutic was satisfactory in all patients. One patient developed a possibly related sepsis one day after the third MaaT013 administration. In the latter case, no pathogen was identified in blood cultures, and the patient recovered after a course of antibiotics. Conclusions We herein report for the first time the treatment of 8 patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-refractory intestinal aGvHD using a full ecosystem, standardized, pooled-donor, high-richness biotherapeutic. Overall, 3/8 patients attained a complete response following treatment with the off-the-shelf MaaT013 product, shown to be safe and effective in these immunocompromised patients with severe conditions, warranting further exploration of the full ecosystem microbiota restoration approach. Disclosures Malard: Sanofi: Honoraria; JAZZ pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Therakos/Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Keocyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Plantamura:MaaT Pharma: Employment. Carter:MaaT Pharma: Employment. Chevallier:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. Blaise:Pierre Fabre medicaments: Honoraria; Molmed: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Mohty:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding.


Cytotherapy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. S224
Author(s):  
J Keto ◽  
T Kaartinen ◽  
U Salmenniemi ◽  
J Partanen ◽  
A Hänninen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1203-1205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Silla ◽  
Vanessa Valim ◽  
Bruna Amorin ◽  
Ana Paula Alegretti ◽  
Fernanda dos Santos de Oliveira ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document