Thalidomide-Dexamethasone as Induction Therapy Prior to Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma and Renal Failure.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4934-4934
Author(s):  
Patrizia Tosi ◽  
Elena Zamagni ◽  
Paola Tacchetti ◽  
Michela Ceccolini ◽  
Giulia Perrone ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4934 Multiple myeloma (MM) patients presenting with renal feature at disease onset should not be excluded from high-dose therapy programs; seeking novel effective and non-nephrotoxic induction regimens is thus mandatory in order to maximize the reduction of tumor burden prior to transplant. From May 2002 to February 2008, 31 newly diagnosed MM patients (18 male, 13 female, median age 60 years) with symptomatic MM and renal failure, defined as creatinine clearance '50ml/min, were enrolled in a clinical trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy and the feasibility of a thalidomide-based regimen as induction therapy in preparation to autologous stem cell transplantation. Sixteen patients had a more severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance '30ml/min) and 7 of them were in chronic hemodyalisis. After informed consent, patients received four months of combined oral thalidomide (thal) (100mg/day for two weeks and 200mg/day thereafter) and dexamethasone (dex) (40mg/day on day 1-4, 9-11, 17-20/28 days on odd cycles and on day 1-4 on even cycles); peripheral blood stem cell collection was thus to be performed after priming with high-dose cyclophosphamide + G-CSF or G-CSF alone; a single or double autologous stem cell transplantation was then to follow, upon preparation with high-dose melphalan. After induction, a PR or better was obtained in 23 patients (74%), with 8 patients (26%) achieving a VGPR or better. No difference in response rate was observed in patients with a baseline creatinine clearance ≥30ml/min (86%) or < 30ml/min (62%). An improvement in renal function was more frequently observed in patients achieving ≥ PR (82% vs. 37% in patients obtaining < PR, p =0.04). Twenty-six patients underwent peripheral blood stem cell mobilization; in 17 of them (65%) the procedure was successful resulting in the collection of > 4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Fifteen patients received a double autologous stem cell transplantation while a single transplant was performed in four patients. Overall, median event-free survival was 30 months, and median survival has not been reached, upon 32 months median follow-up. Toxicity profile of thal-dex was comparable to that observed in patients with a normal renal function. In conclusion, our data show that thal-dex can be safely administered in patients with newly diagnosed MM and renal failure. given the relationship between recovery of renal function and response to induction treatment, more intensive thal + bortezomib-including regimens could be potentially useful in order to rescue a higher number of patients. Disclosures Off Label Use: Thalidomide plus dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 952-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
Hye Jin Kim ◽  
Dong Soon Lee ◽  
Hyeon Seok Eom ◽  
Jun Ho Jang ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Effective reduction of myeloma before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) prolongs survival in multiple myeloma patients. Recently, incorporation of novel agents resulted in improved response rate and reduced side effect in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Method: Patients are planned to receive 2 cycles of VAD (vincristine 0.4mg D1-4, adriamycin 9mg/m2 D1-4, dexamethasone 40mg D1-4, 9–12 every 3 weeks), and VTD (bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 D1, 4, 8, 11, thalidomide 100mg daily, dexamethasone 40mg D1-4, 9–12 every 3 weeks). High dose melphalan (200mg/m2) is used as a conditioning regimen for ASCT. Bortezomib (1.3mg/m2) as a maintenance treatment is administered weekly x 4 times every 6 weeks for 4 cycles after ASCT. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria, with additional category of nCR. Adverse events were graded by the NCI-CTCAE, Version 3.0. Result: At this interim analysis, 60 patients have been entered into the ongoing trial, and efficacy could be assessed in 53 patients. After 2 cycles of VAD, response rate was 70%. After VTD, two patients showed further improvement with additional CR, and an overall response was 97% with 14% CR. Especially, patients with poor prognostic cytogenetics (n=6) all responded after VTD. So far, autologous stem cells were successfully collected in all 28 patients with a median CD34+ count of 7.8 x 106/kg (range, 2.17–44.7 x 106/kg). In 24 patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation, five patients gained additional CR. There was no progression in patients completed bortezomib maintenance (n=9, CR 77%). The median follow-up duration was 6 months, median time to response was 1.4 months, and median overall survival was not reached. Grade 3,4 hematologic toxicity was more frequently observed after VAD than VTD (anemia 15.8%, 4.6%, neutropenia 7.9%, 3.5%), and incidence of grade 2,3 peripheral neuropathy was low (VAD 3.5%, VTD 7%). Conclusion: Sequential VAD and VTD induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma was highly effective, even in patients with poor prognostic cytogenetics, and did not prejudice stem cell collection. VTD could have contributed to increased RR and minimized side effects. An updated results will be presented at the ASH meeting. *Protocol Number: KMM51-NCT00378755.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3559-3559
Author(s):  
Florian Faußner ◽  
Markus Pfirrmann ◽  
Wolfram Dempke

Abstract Abstract 3559 Introduction. Myeloablative high dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by single autologous stem cell transplantation is currently the standard treatment for patients younger than 65 years in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HDT with standard dose therapy (SDT) have shown some benefit in overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), whereas other RCTs did not confirm this finding. Koreth et al. (2007) performed a metaanalysis summarizing the existing data of the RCTs including 2,411 patients. These authors found a significant superiority for HDT in PFS but not in OS. Since a number of new studies have been published recently, we attempted to re-analyze the current data in terms of the endpoints OS and PFS. Methods. We searched PubMed, Embase, abstracts of former ASH meetings and ClinicalTrials.gov as well as bibliographies of included trials and recent reviews from september 2009 until may, 20th 2010. Amongst the 3,484 results in this search we identified 10 RCTs comparing HDT with SDT on an intent-to-treat-basis. Treatment characeristics and outcomes of OS and PFS were calculated using R. Furthermore, we tested for statistical heterogenity, publication bias and performed subgroup analyses. Results. 9 RCTs including 2,600 patients were fully analyzed. Patients undergoing HDT with stem cell transplantation did have significant PFS benefit (Hazard Ratio 0.73; 95% conficence intervall 0.56–0.95; P=0.02) but not OS benefit (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.74–1.10; P=0.32) compared to patients undergoing SDT. Additional data from ongoing clinical trials are expected, thus updated results at the meeting including 10 RCTs with about 3,400 patients will be presented. Conclusion. Although there is only a trend to OS benefit with HDT, it is currently still the first line treatment. Additional data from ongoing clinical trials and new studies using novel agents like thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib are egerly warrented to finally evaluate the role of HDT in the treatment management of patients with newly diagnosed MM. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Jeevan Kumar ◽  
Sachin Minhas ◽  
Kamini Khillan ◽  
Manorama Bhargava ◽  
Shyam Aggarwal

Background: The use of novel agents for induction prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has considerably improved the complete response (CR) rate in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. There are very few studies from the developing countries on the use of novel agents followed by ASCT.Aims and Objectives: The current study was aimed for retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and response rates of induction with bortezomib (Velcade) plus dexamethasone (VD regimen) followed by ASCT in Indian patients.Materials and Methods: Ten patients with newly diagnosed, symptomatic MM who had received four cycles of VD induction before stem cell collection were evaluated. High dose melphalan was given for conditioning followed by stem cell transfusion. Thalidomide or lenalidomide was used as post-transplantation maintenance treatment.Results: Post VD induction, the overall response rate (ORR) was 90% including 20% CR, 40% very good partial response (VGPR), and 30% partial response (PR). Post ASCT, the ORR was 100%, including 80% CR and 20% VGPR. The 5-year overall survival and progression free survival rates were 65.6% and 57.1%, respectively.Conclusions: The VD induction regimen was effective and well tolerated in this retrospective analysis of Indian patients with newly diagnosed MM. It significantly improved the post-induction and post-transplant response rates without affecting stem cell collection.Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.7(4) 2016 44-48 


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Hongfei Zhong ◽  
Xiaojie Xie ◽  
Gaosi Xu

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard treatment for multiple myeloma (MM), but the clinical response and renal curative effect in MM patients with renal failure (RF) remain controversial. The myeloma kidney disease has different types, and most are due to the direct toxic effects of light chain. Although ASCT can effectively clear the light chain, the data of renal function improvement are still limited. We reviewed the published literatures, focusing on the prospective studies, the retrospective analysis studies, and the case reports. RF patients who received ASCT displayed a low survival rate (OS: HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.020 to 3.720; I2=64.9%, P=0.014) and a shorter EFS/PFS (EFS/PFS: HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.090 to 2.140; I2=0%, P=0.669). However, ASCT was feasible and could have the similar clinical response outcomes compared with the normal renal function (CR: OR 1.013, 95% CI 0.569 to 1.804; I2=48.5%, P=0.101; PR: OR 1.013, 95% CI 0.342 to 1.226; I2=46.3%, P=0.144). Moreover, MM with RF after ASCT had a good improvement of renal function and melphalan is still an important factor affecting the treatment of ASCT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document