Tinzaparin Is Effective and Safe for the Treatment and Extended Secondary Prophylaxis In Cancer Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1104-1104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott T Tagawa ◽  
Ilene c Weitz ◽  
Casey L. O'Connell ◽  
Leanne Rochanda ◽  
Mckenna Archer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Pharmaceutical Research ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Major Bleeding Events

Abstract Abstract 1104 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major complication in cancer patients. The traditional treatment algorithm for VTE of UF or LMW heparin followed warfarin is associated with a higher risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding in cancer patients. A recent randomized trial has demonstrated that initial treatment and secondary prophylaxis with LMWH is associated with a lower VTE recurrence when compared to secondary prophylaxis with warfarin. We initiated a single arm Phase 2 IRB approved study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once daily tinzaparin for the initial treatment and extended prophylaxis (6 months) of VTE in cancer patients. Included in this study was a prospective analysis of plasma biomarkers to assess whether any biomarkers could predict treatment failure or be predictive of patient survival. Methods: Patients (pts)with objectively confirmed symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) or unexpected PE detected on staging CT scans by the criteria of OConnell et al. (JCO 24:4928, 2006) were eligible for this study, if they had an ECOG score <2 and an estimated 6 month survival. After informed consent, treatment was initiated with tinzaparin 175 U/Kg for 6 months. Planned enrollment was 100 pts. Pts who completed the 6 month study could continue on treatment for an additional 6 months if clinically appropriate. All pts who received at least one injection of tinzaparin were evaluable for efficacy and safety. Study endpoints were objectively confirmed DVT, PE or major bleeding events. Serial blood samples were obtained prior to treatment, at 1 wk, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. Biomarkers to be studied included D-dimer (D-D), Thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), interleukin 6 and 8 (Il-6, Il-8) and plasma tissue factor. Only pts in whom the pretreatment, I week and 1 month blood samples were collected were included in the biomarker analysis. Results: At time of this submission 91 pts were treated on study. Of 91 pts enrolled 39 (42.9%) have completed the 6 months and 5 (5.5%) remain on active treatment. Eight (8.8%) pts withdrew from study for hospice care and one pt was withdrawn due to poor compliance. Forty-two (46%) pts died before 6 months. Ten (11%) pts continued on treatment after 6 months and one pt transitioned to warfarin treatment. Treatment endpoints included 8 (8.8%) pts with recurrent VTE (5 DVT, 3 PE); 2 occurred within the first 4 wks on treatment and the 6 events before month 3. No recurrent VTE occurred after 12wks. Three pts (3%) had major bleeding events. There were no fatal thrombotic or bleeding events. All deaths were considered due to progressive cancer, although the possible fatal VTE in pts who died at home or in hospice could not be excluded. There were 76 (83.5%) pts were evaluable for the biomarker study. Biomarker data failed to show a correlation between the level of D-D, TAT or Il-6 and patient survival from the time of their thrombotic event. However, in pts who developed recurrent VTE after 1 month, the D-D level at month 1 was higher than the pretreatment in 4/6 (66.7%) patients compared to 8/70 (11.4%) pts with no recurrence in whom month 1 samples were obtained. Conclusion: In this prospective study of tinzaparin for initial treatment and secondary prophylaxis of cancer-associated VTE, treatment appeared both safe and efficacious. Our recurrent VTE event rate of 8.8% compares favorably with the 8% recurrent VTE reported in the pts treated with dalteparin. The 3% of patients who had major bleeding events also compares favorably with the CLOT trial. Survival was difficult to predict at the time of enrollment since 46% failed to survive the 6 months. Biomarker data failed to predict survival, but patients who recurred after the first month were more likely to have month 1 D-D levels greater than pretreatment. The reason for the failure of tinzaparin treatment to effectively suppress thrombin generation in these patients remains unexplained. Disclosures: Tagawa: Leo Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Liebman:Leo Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Extended Anticoagulant Therapy Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Venous Thromboembolism

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 178-178
Author(s):  
Haesuk Park ◽  
Hye-Rim Kang ◽  
Pei-Lin Huang ◽  
Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic ◽  
Eric A Dietrich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Program ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Extended Treatment ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Program Research

Abstract Introduction: Approximately 30% of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) experience a recurrence within 10 years of the initial event with their recurrence risk peaking during the first 6-12 months. Two large randomized clinical trials AMPLIFY-EXT and PADIS-PE reported that extended treatment with apixaban and warfarin beyond 6 months of initial treatment reduced recurrent VTE without increasing the rate of major bleeding compared to placebo, respectively. Little is known about real-world effectiveness and safety of extended oral anticoagulation beyond 6 months of initial treatment for Medicare beneficiaries with VTE, despite the fact that VTE disproportionately affects the elderly. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of extended use of apixaban and warfarin beyond 6 months of initial treatment for prevention of recurrent VTE and adverse major bleeding events among Medicare beneficiaries with newly diagnosed VTE. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using 2014-2018 Medicare data (5% samples in 2014-2016 and 15% samples of Medicare beneficiaries in 2017-2018) was conducted for patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism ascertained from inpatient claims. Patients were included if they initiated anticoagulants within 30 days of their first VTE diagnosis, completed 6 months of therapy defined as ≥83% proportion days covered with oral anticoagulants during the initial 6-month period, and received extended treatment with either apixaban or warfarin or no extended therapy. We compared the risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding between apixaban, warfarin, and no treatment groups. To adjust for differences in baseline characteristics and clinical factors (e.g., HAS-BLED score, active cancer, and provoked VTE) between groups, we used the stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method. Follow-up continued until the occurrence of the first event, switch to the comparator, disenrollment, death, or end of the study period. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling with IPTW was used to obtain adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results: The study cohort (mean age=74 ±12 years, 40% male, 76% White) consisted of 2,315 users of extended apixaban treatment (83% with 5 mg twice a day and 17% with 2.5 mg twice a day; mean duration=6.2 months), 2,757 users of extended warfarin treatment (mean duration=8.2 months), and 2,328 patients with no extended treatment following completion of an initial 6 months of anticoagulant treatment. The incidence rates of recurrent VTE were 0.42, 1.73, and 1.72 per 100 person-years, and those of major bleeding were 2.28, 3.62, and 1.43 per 100 person-years in the apixaban, warfarin, and no treatment groups, respectively (Table 1). Compared to no extended treatment, the use of apixaban was associated with an 80% decreased risk of recurrent VTE (aHR=0.19, 95%CI=0.06-0.55) without increasing the risk of major bleeding (aHR=1.19, 95%CI=0.65-2.19); the use of warfarin did not lower the risk of recurrent VTE (aHR=0.75, 95%CI=0.42-1.37) but increased the risk of major bleeding (aHR=1.92, 95%CI=1.13-3.25). Compared to the use of warfarin, the use of apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of recurrent VTE (aHR=0.26, 95% CI=0.09-0.76) and no difference in major bleeding risk (aHR=0.61, 95%CI=0.36-1.06). These findings remained consistent in subgroup (e.g., patients with provoked vs. unprovoked VTE, patients with active cancer vs. those without, and patients with chronic kidney diseases vs. those without) and sensitivity analyses (e.g., ≥92% proportion days covered with oral anticoagulants during the initial 6-month period). Conclusions: Compared to no extended therapy, extended anticoagulation with apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent VTE without increasing the risk of major bleeding, whereas warfarin did not lower risk of recurrent VTE but increased the risk of major bleeding among Medicare beneficiaries with VTE. In the head-to-head comparison, the use of apixaban was more effective than warfarin in preventing recurrent VTE, without increasing the risk of major bleeding events. Our findings suggest that apixaban is an effective and safer option for extended treatment of VTE when compared to warfarin or no treatment among Medicare beneficiaries with VTE. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Park: BMS/Pfizer Alliance American Thrombosis Investigator Initiated Research Program: Research Funding. Kang: BMS/Pfizer Alliance American Thrombosis InvestigatorInitiated Research Program: Research Funding. Huang: BMS/Pfizer Alliance American Thrombosis Investigator Initiated Research Program: Research Funding. Lo-Ciganic: MERCK: Research Funding; BMS/Pfizer Alliance American Thrombosis Investigator Initiated Research Program: Research Funding. Dietrich: BMS/Pfizer Alliance American Thrombosis Investigator Initiated Research Program: Research Funding. Murphy: North American Thrombosis Foundation: Honoraria. DeRemer: BMS/Pfizer Alliance American Thrombosis Investigator Initiated Research Program: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; BMS advisory board attendee: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Safety of Anticoagulant Therapies for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1178-1178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Streiff ◽  
Dejan Milentijevic ◽  
Keith McCrae ◽  
Daniel Yannicelli ◽  
Jonathan Fortier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Control Cohort ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Major Bleeding Events

Abstract Introduction: Anticoagulation is effective for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients, but it is also associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Previous clinical trials (e.g., CLOT and CATCH) of LMWH and warfarin for the treatment of VTE in cancer patients reported major bleeding in 3% to 6% of treated patients. The objective of this observational study was to compare the risk of major bleeding in cancer patients treated with anticoagulants for VTE in a real world setting. Methods: Medical and pharmacy claims from the Humana Database from 1/1/2013 to 05/31/2015 were analyzed. Newly diagnosed cancer patients with a first VTE diagnosis occurring after their first cancer diagnosis, and with ≥1 dispensing of an anticoagulant within 7 days after their VTE diagnosis, were selected. Based on the first anticoagulant received, patients were classified into one of the following cohorts: LMWH, warfarin, and rivaroxaban (other agents not included due to low utilization). Inverse probability of treatment weights based on propensity score were used to adjust for differences between treatment cohorts for the following comparisons: LMWH vs. rivaroxaban, LMWH vs. warfarin, and rivaroxaban vs. warfarin. Patients were followed up until the earliest event, either treatment non-persistence (gap > 60 days between the end of the days of supply of a dispensing and the start date of the next dispensing), or end of data availability. Major bleeding events were identified using validated criteria (Cunningham et al., 2011). Kaplan-Meier rates at 3 and 6 months and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the risk of bleeding between different treatment cohorts. To better understand the risk of major bleeding in cancer patients unrelated to anticoagulation, a cohort of patients with cancer who did not have VTE and did not receive an anticoagulant was added as a control cohort. Results: A total of 2,428 patients (LMWH: n=660; warfarin: n=1,061; rivaroxaban: n=707) were included. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced among treatment cohorts. Median duration of therapy with LMWH was shorter than rivaroxaban (1.0 vs. 3.0 months, p<.0001) and warfarin (1.0 vs. 3.5 months, p<.0001). Rates of major bleeding for LMWH and rivaroxaban were 8.3% and 8.2%, respectively at 6 months with a hazard ratio (HRs [95% CI]) of 1.03 (0.64-1.65; Figure 1A). In the comparison between LMWH and warfarin cohorts, major bleeding rates were 8.5% and 8.6%, respectively at 6 months with hazard ratio (HRs [95% CI]) of 1.04 (0.69-1.57; Figure 1B). The risk of major bleeding was also similar for rivaroxaban and warfarin cohorts, 9.0% and 8.7%, respectively at 6 months with a hazard ratio (HR [95% CI]) of 1.01 (0.71-1.43; Figure 1C). For the control cohort of cancer patients without VTE and not receiving anticoagulation median follow-up was 5.6 months. Rates of major bleeding events for the control cohort were 2.6% and 4.2 % at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Conclusion: This real world study of cancer patients treated for VTE found that the risk of major bleeding was similar for the 3 most widely prescribed anticoagulants in current clinical practice: LMWH, warfarin, and rivaroxaban. The observed rates of major bleeding were generally higher than what has been reported for LMWH and warfarin in the CLOT and CATCH trials. Patient characteristics such as older age (average age 73 years) could have contributed to the higher major bleeding rate seen in this study compared to the CLOT and CATCH trials, respectively. Figure 1 Rates of Major Bleeding Events LMWH vs. rivaroxaban cohorts Figure 1. Rates of Major Bleeding Events. / LMWH vs. rivaroxaban cohorts Figure 2 LMWH vs. warfarin cohorts Figure 2. LMWH vs. warfarin cohorts Figure 3 rivaroxaban vs. warfarin cohorts Figure 3. rivaroxaban vs. warfarin cohorts Disclosures Streiff: Portola: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding. Milentijevic:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Employment, Equity Ownership. McCrae:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yannicelli:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fortier:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Nelson:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Employment, Equity Ownership. Laliberté:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Crivera:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lefebvre:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Schein:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Own in excess of $10,000 of J&J stock. Khorana:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Halozyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Leo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Case Fatality Rate of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism and Major Bleeding Events Among Patients Treated for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2528-2528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alym Abdulla ◽  
Wendy Davis ◽  
Namali Ratnaweera ◽  
Brooke Scott ◽  
Agnes Yuet Ying Lee
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Case Fatality Rate ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Major Bleeding Events

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Despite therapeutic anticoagulation, the risks of recurrent VTE and major bleeding are approximately 10% and 5%, respectively, during the first 6 months of treatment. Overall mortality ranges from 25% to 40%, depending on the study population. Knowing the case fatality rates of these outcomes is also important for weighing the relative risks and benefits of anticoagulation in patients with cancer-associated VTE but these rates have not been reported previously. Objective To determine the incidence of recurrent VTE and major bleeding events and to calculate the case fatality rates of these outcomes in patients undergoing anticoagulation for cancer-associated VTE. Methods An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1980 to May 2018 was performed. English language publications (observational studies and randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) that reported on patients with active cancer and VTE who received anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), vitamin K antagonist (VKA), or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for at least 3 months were retrieved for review. In addition, a hand search of references of review articles was done to complement the electronic literature search. Studies that provided information on recurrent VTE, major bleeding events, mortality, and causes of death were included in analyses. Retrospective studies and prospective cohorts with fewer than 50 patients were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened for study eligibility and extracted data onto standardized forms. Study outcomes were recurrent VTE, major bleeding and death. Pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated according to anticoagulant treatment and study design. Results The search identified 7327 studies of which 29 studies (15 prospective cohort studies and 14 randomized controlled trials) were included. Data from 8000 cancer patients followed for a total of 4786 patient-years (range 3 to 36 months) were summarized. The rate of recurrent VTE and fatal recurrent VTE were 15.7% (95% CI, 14.4% to 17.1%) and 2.5% (95% CI, 2.0% to 3.0%) per patient-year of follow-up, respectively, with a case fatality rate of 15.8% (95% CI, 12.7% to 18.8%). A sub-analysis revealed case fatality rates for recurrent VTE to be 16.3% (95% CI, 12.2% to 20.4%) for LMWH, 20.4% (95% CI, 14.0% to 26.8%) for VKA, and 10.8% (95% CI, 3.2% to 18.3%) for DOAC therapies. The rate of major bleeding and fatal major bleeding events were 6.4% (95% CI, 5.5% to 7.3%) and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.8% to 1.6%) per patient-year of follow-up, respectively, with a case fatality rate of 12.3% (95% CI, 8.7% to 15.9%). A sub-analysis revealed case fatality rates for major bleeding events to be 14.9% (95% CI, 9.6% to 20.2%), 27.9% (95% CI, 14.5% to 41.3%), and 1.9% (95% CI, 0% to 5.5%) for LMWH, VKA, and DOAC therapies, respectively. Among RCTs, case fatality for recurrent VTE was 17.3% (95% CI, 13.5% to 21.2%) and for major bleeding was 10.8% (95% CI, 3.2% to 18.3%). Among prospective cohort studies, respective case fatality rates were 12.8% (95% CI, 8.0% to 17.5%) and 15.3% (95% CI, 8.6% to 22.0%). Studies were heterogeneous in the duration of follow up and their reporting of the causes of death and definition of fatal PE. Conclusion The incidences of recurrent VTE and major bleed events are high in patients with cancer-associated VTE on anticoagulant therapy. Case fatality from recurrent thrombosis is higher than the case fatality from major bleeding. Differences among various anticoagulants likely reflect patient selection bias and heterogeneity of studies. Disclosures Lee: BMS: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Apixaban Thromboprophylaxis in Ambulatory Cancer Patients By Renal Function: A Subgroup Analysis of the Avert Trial

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3229-3229
Author(s):  
Tzu-Fei Wang ◽  
Ranjeeta Mallick ◽  
Marc Carrier ◽  
Philip S. Wells
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Major Bleeding Events ◽  
Overall Mortality

Abstract Background Patients with cancer have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and associated morbidity and mortality. Renal dysfunction is more common in patients with cancer, leading to heightened risks of bleeding and thrombotic complications. In the AVERT trial, thromboprophylaxis with apixaban resulted in a significantly lower rate of VTE and higher rate of major bleeding compared to placebo among intermediate-to-high-risk ambulatory cancer patients starting chemotherapy. As apixaban depends on some degree of renal clearance, there may be concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of apixaban thromboprophylaxis in patients with renal insufficiency. In this post-hoc analysis of AVERT, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of apixaban thromboprophylaxis according to renal function at randomization. Methods Eligible patients were randomized to apixaban (2.5mg twice daily) or placebo. First dose of study drug was given within 24 hours of the first chemotherapy administration with the intended treatment period of 180 days. For this subgroup analysis, the efficacy and safety of apixaban thromboprophylaxis was evaluated accordingly to renal function (calculated creatinine clearance [CrCl] by Cockcroft-Gault Equation) at randomization. Patients with CrCl &lt; 30 mL/min were excluded from the trial. The primary efficacy outcome was objectively confirmed major VTE (proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) within 180 days (±3 days) following randomization. The primary efficacy outcome was evaluated by modified intention-to-treat analysis, which included all patients who had undergone randomization and received at least one dose of study medication on or before day 180 (±3 days). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. The primary safety outcome was evaluated by on-treatment analysis, when events were counted only if they occurred on study drugs or up to two days after discontinuation of the study drugs. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant non-major bleeding and overall mortality. Results A total of 574 patients underwent randomization, with 563 patients included in the original primary efficacy and safety analysis (288 apixaban and 275 placebo). Upon randomization, 66 (11.5%) patients had CrCl &lt; 60 mL/min and 508 (88.5%) patients had CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min. Patients with CrCl &lt; 60 mL/min were significantly older, more female, had lower weight and fewer with body mass index (BMI) &gt; 35 kg/m 2 and poorer ECOG performance status (Table 1). In patients with CrCl &lt; 60 mL/min, VTE occurred in no patient on apixaban compared to 1 on placebo, and major bleeding episode occurred in 1 on apixaban and 0 on placebo. In patients with CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min, VTE occurred in 13 out of 257 (5.1%) in the apixaban group and 28 out of 242 (11.6%) in the placebo group [HR 0.41 (95% CI 0.26-0.64), p=0.0001] (Table 2). There were no significant differences between apixaban and placebo groups in major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events. Overall mortality was significantly lower in the apixaban group (HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.13-0.45], p&lt;0.0001) in patients with CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min. Conclusions In the AVERT trial, patients with CrCl &lt; 60 mL/min were significantly older, more likely to be female, with lower weight or BMI and poorer ECOG performance status. There were very few VTE or major bleeding events in patients with CrCl &lt; 60 mL/min. In patients with CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min, apixaban thromboprophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower rate of VTE and overall mortality compared to placebo, with no significant differences in the rates of major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo Pharma: Research Funding. Carrier: Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria. Wells: Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; BMS/Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: apixaban for primary thromboporphylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

A Randomized Trial of Long-Term Tinzaparin, a Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH), Versus Warfarin for Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Cancer Patients - the CATCH Study

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. LBA-2-LBA-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes Y.Y. Lee ◽  
Pieter W. Kamphuisen ◽  
Guy Meyer ◽  
Rupert Bauersachs ◽  
Mette S. Janas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Advisory Boards ◽  
Recurrent Vte

Abstract Background Patients with cancer and VTE have a substantial risk of recurrent VTE. LMWH reduces the risk of symptomatic, recurrent VTE compared with warfarin and is recommended as the preferred anticoagulant by consensus guidelines. However, the evidence is based largely on a single, open-label randomized trial (CLOT; Lee et al NEJM 2003). Warfarin is still often used for the treatment of VTE in cancer patients worldwide. Methods The primary objective of this randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase III trial (CATCH; NCT01130025) was to assess the efficacy of tinzaparin in preventing recurrent VTE in patients with active cancer and acute, symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE). Patients were randomized (stratified by geographic region, tumor characteristic [distant metastasis, no distant metastasis, hematological malignancy] and history of VTE) to receive tinzaparin 175 IU/kg once daily for 6 months or initial tinzaparin 175 IU/kg once daily for 5–10 days overlapped and followed by dose-adjusted warfarin (target INR 2.0–3.0) for 6 months. The primary efficacy outcome was time to recurrent VTE verified by objective, standard imaging and blinded central adjudication; this was a composite primary endpoint that included symptomatic DVT and/or PE, incidental proximal DVT and/or PE and fatal PE. The primary safety endpoint was incidence of major bleeding. All patients were followed up to 6 months or death, whichever came sooner. Blinded central adjudication was also performed for all bleeding events and causes of death. A proportional hazards model for competing risks was applied to all randomized patients, treating all non-VTE-related deaths as competing events. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board reviewed safety data at regular intervals. Results Nine hundred patients were included from 165 sites in 32 countries across 5 continents. Of these, 449 were randomized to tinzaparin and 451 to warfarin. Mean age was 59 years (range 18–89); 59% female. A total of 77% of patients had a baseline ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–1 and 23% had a PS of 2. The most common primary tumor sites were gynecologic (23%), colorectal (13%), lung (12%), breast (9%); 10% had hematological malignancies. At the time of randomization, metastatic disease was present in 55% of patients and 44% had received prior cancer treatment (chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiation). Time-in-therapeutic range was 47% in the warfarin arm, with 27% above and 26% below the range. Over the 6-month trial period, 31 patients (6.9%) in the tinzaparin arm experienced recurrent VTE compared with 45 (10%) in the warfarin arm (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65 [95% CI 0.41–1.03; P=0.07]) (see figure). There were 2 patients with incidental VTE, both were in the warfarin arm. Symptomatic non-fatal DVT occurred in 12 patients (2.7%) in the tinzaparin arm and 24 (5.3%) in the warfarin arm (HR 0.48 [95% CI 0.24–0.96]; P=0.04). Symptomatic non-fatal PE occurred in 3 patients in the tinzaparin arm and 2 in the warfarin arm; fatal PE occurred in 17 (3.8%) patients in each arm (HR 0.96 [95% CI 0.49–1.88]; P=0.90). There was no difference in the incidence of major bleeding events (n=13 [2.9%] in the tinzaparin arm and 12 [2.7%] in the warfarin arm), but significantly fewer patients experienced clinically relevant non-major bleeding with tinzaparin than warfarin (50 [11%] and 73 [16%] patients, respectively; P=0.03). No difference in mortality was seen with 6-month survival rates of 59% and 60%, respectively. Conclusions In cancer patients with symptomatic VTE, tinzaparin lowered the risk of recurrent VTE compared with warfarin, with a significant reduction in symptomatic DVT and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. No difference in major bleeding or overall mortality was observed. Figure. Cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE in the tinzaparin and warfarin groups. Figure. Cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE in the tinzaparin and warfarin groups. Disclosures Lee: Bayer: Advisory Boards Other, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other; Eisai: Research Funding; LEO Pharma: Advisory Boards Other; Pfizer: Advisory Boards Other, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other; Avivia: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other. Kamphuisen:LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Meyer:Bayer: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; LEO Pharma: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding. Janas:LEO Pharma: Employment. Jarner:LEO Pharma: Employment. Khorana:LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Major Bleeding with Ibrutinib: More Than Expected

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3229-3229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul R Kunk ◽  
Joesph Mock ◽  
Michael E. Devitt ◽  
Surabhi Palkimas ◽  
Jeremy Sen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
University Of Virginia ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Major Bleeding Events

Abstract Introduction: Ibrutinib is a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has significant activity in treating lymphoma. While approved for patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), its activity in other lymphomas and solid tumors is under investigation and its use is increasing dramatically. Overall it is well tolerated compared to chemotherapy, but bleeding has emerged as a common adverse event with rates as high as 50% and major bleeding around 3% (Jones, abstract #1990, 2014 ASH Annual Meeting). As the use of ibrutinib increases outside of a clinical trial setting, the rate of major bleeding is likely to rise. Methods: To better understand the risk of bleeding in ibrutinib treated patients, we reviewed all patients at the University of Virginia and satellite clinics who were treated with ibrutinib between January 2012 and May 2016. Patients were required to be treated for at least 1 month with documented follow up for assessment of adverse events. Medical charts were reviewed for age, gender, ibrutinib indication and dose, length of treatment, concurrent medications, blood tests and bleeding events. All forms of anti-platelets and anticoagulants drugs, as well as medications interacting with cytochrome P450 3A4 (3A4), which metabolizes ibrutinib, were recorded. All bleeding events were recorded and graded according the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, v4.0. Major bleeding events were reviewed by all investigators. Results: Eighty-nine patients were identified. Eighteen patients were excluded for insufficient follow up leaving 71 patients for analysis. Median age was 73 years old (44-92) with 74% male. The most common indications for treatment were CLL (65%) and MCL (27%). Most patients were treated with either 420mg (64%) or 560mg (21%). Median length of time on ibrutinib was 412 days, most with ongoing use at time of data collection. Seventy percent of patients were also treated with an anti-platelet medication, mostly aspirin for CAD with several patients on multiple anti-platelet medications. Seventeen percent were treated with an anti-coagulant, mostly apixaban for atrial fibrillation. Thirteen percent of patients (9/71) were treated with combined anti-platelet and anti-coagulant medications. Ten percent of patients were treated with a medication that has a moderate or strong interaction with 3A4. Bleeding of any grade occurred in 56% of patients, mostly bruising and epistaxis. Major bleeding, defined as grade 3 or higher, occurred in 18% of patients. Three patients developed major bleeding after an invasive procedure without ibrutinib being held. One patient died as a result of peri-procedural bleeding. Of the 9 patients treated with combined anti-platelet and anti-coagulant therapy, 78% suffered a major bleeding event. Of the ten patients on ibrutinib alone, without concurrent use of an anti-platelet, anti-coagulant or 3A4 drug interaction, no major bleeding events occurred. Conclusion: In this study examining real world use of ibrutinib, the rates of major bleeding are higher than previously reported. Most patients who suffered major bleeding were also treated with an anti-coagulant and/or anti-platelet medication. As the use of ibrutinib increases outside of clinical trials, a careful review of medications should be performed in addition to adherence to perioperative drug withholding guidelines. Patients requiring anti-coagulant and/or anti-platelet medications while on ibrutinib need careful consideration of the risks and benefits given the higher incidence of bleeding in this population. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Portell: AbbVie: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding. Williams:Janssen and Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; University of Virginia: Employment.

Major Bleeding Complications Among Patients Treated with Ibrutinib and Concomitant Antiplatelet, Anticoagulant, or Supplemental Therapy

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4387-4387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Pavlik ◽  
Hallie Barr ◽  
Emily Dotson ◽  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Kristie A. Blum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Major Bleeding Events

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib, an orally bioavailable small molecular inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), is an approved therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and Waldenstrӧm's macroglobulinemia (WM). Beyond B lymphocytes, BTK signaling is important for collagen-mediated platelet activation, and BTK inhibition has been associated with primary hemostatic bleeding events (Levade et al Blood 2014). Although serious bleeding events have been uncommon (1-5%) in clinical trial populations, there is limited data describing the potential for increased serious bleeding incidence when ibrutinib is co-administered with other agents affecting the clotting cascade or platelet function. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of major bleeding in patients receiving ibrutinib concomitantly with antiplatelet agents (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, ADP inhibitors), anticoagulants (heparins, warfarin, novel oral anticoagulants), or supplements with potential anticoagulant activity (vitamin E and fish oil). Major bleeding events were identified using criteria developed by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (Schulman et al J Thromb Haemost 2005). Patients 18-89 years of age and treated with ibrutinib for CLL, MCL, or WM between March 1, 2010 and March 1, 2015 were included. The primary endpoint of this study was the incidence of major bleeding events, but we also sought to identify risk factors associated with the development of major bleeding, focusing on potential drug interactions. Based on the historic prevalence of major bleeding in ibrutinib clinical studies, we calculated that at least 20 major bleeding events would need to be identified in order to perform blinded multinomial regression on the collected data of an estimated 400 patients. Results: 437 eligible patients were included in the analysis. Patients were overwhelmingly male (71.4%) and white (94.8%), with a mean age of 67.1 years (range: 29-89). 53.1% received ibrutinib as participants of a clinical trial, and the remainder received standard-of-care ibrutinib treatment. The table (upper panel) summarizes use of concomitant antihemostatic agents by presence or absence of major bleeding events. Characteristics of the major bleeding events are further detailed in the lower panel. The most commonly observed concomitant antihemostatic medication was aspirin, with 147 patients (33.6%) being exposed to aspirin within the study period. Fourteen instances of major bleeding were observed, corresponding to an overall incidence of 3.2%. These major bleeding events all occurred in CLL patients receiving ibrutinib at the standard dose of 420 mg daily. Two patients had platelet counts less than 50 k/µL at time of the bleeding event. One-half of the major bleeding events were observed in the absence of an antihemostatic medication, and 2 of the observed major bleeding events resulted in death (1 received concomitant warfarin). Fourteen patients (3.3%) in the group without major bleeding were on anticoagulation, 4 being warfarin. The most common sites of major bleeding were gastrointestinal (50%), intracranial (14.3%) and thoracic (14.3%). While most patients developing major bleeding permanently discontinued ibrutinib (57.1%), approximately one third of the patients who developed major bleeding subsequently resumed ibrutinib following resolution of the bleeding event. Subsequently, these patients did not experience a recurrent major bleeding event. The rate of major bleeding did not meet power to detect statistical differences in bleeding events when comparing concomitant therapy, Conclusions: Our observed incidence of major bleeding is consistent with previous controlled clinical trials, suggesting similar safety profile when ibrutinib is used outside of a controlled setting. Major bleeding events were uncommon despite the frequent co-administration of antiplatelet agents. However, because we modified practice early to avoid therapeutic anticoagulation during ibrutinib therapy whenever possible, the number of patients receiving such drugs in combination was small and precludes inferences regarding safety. Table Table. Disclosures Blum: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Awan:Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis Oncology: Consultancy. Woyach:Acerta: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding. Christian:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Jones:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

A Pilot Study in Cancer Patients with Central Venous Catheter Associated Deep Vein Thrombosis in Upper Extremity Treated with Rivaroxaban (Catheter 2)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 878-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwynivere A Davies ◽  
Alejandro Lazo-Langner ◽  
Esteban Gandara ◽  
Vicky Tagalakis ◽  
Martha L Louzada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Catheter Survival ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Introduction Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) represents up to 10% of cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and is frequently associated with central venous catheter (CVC) placement in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. UEDVT may be treated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) either as monotherapy or subsequently transitioned to warfarin as we have previously shown (Kovacs 2007). Whereas for non-cancer VTE rivaroxaban is at least as efficacious and safe as warfarin, the latter is problematic in cancer patients and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) such as rivaroxaban have not been studied to date in this setting. In this study weevaluated thesafety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in the treatment of UEDVT secondary to CVC in patients with cancer. Methods We conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study at 3 centres in Canada between December 2012 and January 2016. We enrolled patients ≥18 years of age with active malignancy and symptomatic proximal UEDVT (axillary or more proximal) with or without pulmonary embolism (PE), associated with a CVC. Exclusion criteria included dialysis catheters, active bleeding, platelet count <75 x 109/L, creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, other anticoagulants, PE with hemodynamic instability, inability to infuse through the catheter after a trial of intraluminal thrombolytic therapy (tissue plasminogen activator,tPa), patients with acute leukemia, patients with multiple myeloma awaiting bone marrow transplant within 3 months, thrombosis involving the brachial,basilic or cephalic veins only, treatment for >7 days with other anticoagulant, need for dual antiplatelet therapy (recent stent), or concomitant use of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4 inhibitors. Primary objective was an estimate of the proportion of catheter survival at 3 months, defined as infusion failure that does not respond to 2 mg oftPa. Secondary objectives included recurrence of DVT, PE, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and death. All events were independently adjudicated. Patients were treated with rivaroxaban at a dose of 15 mgpo bid for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mgpo daily for 9 more weeks (minimum 12 weeks).tPa (oralteplase) for management of blocked lines was allowed. Patients were followed clinically for 12 weeks to assess for clinical events including recurrent DVT and/or PE, major bleeding and CRNMB, and by phone at 6 months. Results We included 70 patients (47[67%] women) with a mean age of 54.1 years. DVTs were diagnosed by ultrasound in 68 (97%) patients, and most commonly involved the subclavian (n=55, 79%) and axillary (n=49, 70%) veins, followed by the internal jugular, brachial, brachiocephalic and external jugular veins. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) were most common (n=54, 77%), followed by port-a-cathlines (n=16, 23%). Types of active malignancy included breast (n=29, 41%), colon (n=8, 11%), colorectal (n=5, 7%), rectal (n=3, 4%), prostate (n=1, 1%), and other (n=24, 34%). Catheter survival was 58.6% (95% CI 46.9 to 69.4) at 12 weeks and no catheters were removed due to thrombosis. Patients had their CVCs removed prior to the end of the study due to end of therapeutic need (n=20), infection (n=2), bleeding (n=2), kinking (n=2), patient preference (n=2), and death (n=1). The 3-month incidence rate of recurrent VTE was 1.43% (95% CI 0.25 to 7.66). There was 1 episode of recurrent VTE presenting as a fatal PE at 6 weeks. It was not known if the patient had a concurrent leg DVT at the time of the PE. There were no other deaths from any cause during the study. There were 11 bleeding events in 9 patients (12.85%, 95%CI 6.9 to 22.7), 6 major and 5 CRNMB (Figure 1). All bleeding events happened during the first 39 days of treatment. 7 patients discontinued anticoagulation during the study due to death (n=1), patient or clinician preference (n=5) and dermatological adverse reaction (n=1). Discussion In this study rivaroxaban showed promise in treating CVC-associated UEDVT in cancer patients, resulting in preserved CVC function. However, the bleeding rates and the occurrence of 1 death due to pulmonary embolism is concerning since we cannot exclude a causative role for the known UEDVT. Further studies are still required prior to recommending rivaroxaban in this setting. Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier curve for cumulative bleeding risk. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curve for cumulative bleeding risk. Disclosures Lazo-Langner: Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Tagalakis:Bayer: Honoraria. Louzada:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kovacs:Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Pharma: Research Funding; LEO Pharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors in 795 Morbidly Obese Patients

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 423-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarita Kushnir ◽  
Yun Choi ◽  
Ruth Eisenberg ◽  
Devika Rao ◽  
Seda Tolu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitors ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Prescription Date ◽  
Recurrent Vte

Abstract Background: Studies of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) have shown comparable therapeutic efficacy and similar or lower bleeding risk for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to warfarin. Because the representation of morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥40 kg/m2) in pivotal clinical trials has been minimal, efficacy and safety of DOACs in this population are unclear. Our goal was to investigate whether direct oral factor Xa inhibitors, apixaban and rivaroxaban, are as effective and safe as warfarin in morbidly obese (BMI ≥40) patients. Methods: Using our institutional database, we identified all adult patients at Montefiore Medical Center with BMI ≥40 who were started on anticoagulation with apixaban, rivaroxaban or warfarin, for either AF or VTE, between March 1, 2013 and March 1, 2017. We reviewed charts to obtain detailed information on patient demographics and to document clinical outcomes of recurrent VTE, ischemic stroke (CVA) and bleeding from the first prescription date to the earliest of a thrombotic event, discontinuation of medication, death, or June 30, 2017. VTE and CVA episodes were confirmed by imaging (compression sonography, CT scans, ventilation/perfusion scans, MRIs). Bleeding events were classified according to criteria from the Control of Anticoagulation Subcommittee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Analyses were stratified by anticoagulation indication. Chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact tests were used to assess statistical significance of the differences in VTE, CVA and bleeding rates between anticoagulant cohorts. Differences in times from first prescription date to VTE, CVA and bleeding were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves, Log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models. Data were adjusted for age, CHA2DS2-VASc, and Charlson scores. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with BMI ≥50 kg/m2. Results: Data on 795 patients were collected. In 366 patients with a history of VTE, the rates of recurrent VTE were low and comparable among the apixaban, rivaroxaban and warfarin cohorts [1/47 (2.1%), 3/152 (2%), and 2/167 (1.2%), respectively, p=0.74]. In the subgroup of individuals with BMI ≥50 kg/m2 (n=92), none of the 40 DOAC patients had recurrent VTE. The rates of clinically relevant bleeding, including major bleeding, among VTE patients, were comparable between the three cohorts. Among the 429 patients with AF, stroke rates were also low and similar among anticoagulant cohorts [1/103 (1%) for apixaban, 4/174 (2.3%) for rivaroxaban, and 2/152 (1.3%) for warfarin, p=0.71]. CVAs were similarly rare in patients with BMI ≥50 (1/19 patients on apixaban, 0/37 on rivaroxaban and 1/44 patients on warfarin). In the AF sample, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of bleeding, including major bleeding, among the 3 cohorts. In an analysis with combined DOAC cohort (apixaban + rivaroxaban vs. warfarin), the recurrent VTE and stroke rates were still low and comparable. There were more major bleeding events in AF patients on warfarin than the combined DOAC cohort (7.9% vs. 2.9%, p=0.02), a finding that became non-significant when adjusted for age, CHA2DS2-VASc, and Charlson scores (p=0.06). The rates of bleeding, including major bleeding, were comparable among the three anticoagulants in both VTE and AF patients with BMI ≥50. Conclusions: Our study is the largest study examining morbidly obese patients on DOACS and provides further evidence of comparable efficacy and safety of the direct oral anti-Xa inhibitors, compared to warfarin, in morbidly obese patients with AF and VTE. Disclosures Kushnir: Janssen: Research Funding. Billett:Bayer: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism and Bleeding in Patients with Cancer Associated Thrombosis

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 18-18
Author(s):  
Doaa Attia ◽  
Xuefei Jia ◽  
Mailey L Wilks ◽  
Barbara Tripp ◽  
Christopher D'Andrea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Cancer Associated Thrombosis

Background: The treatment paradigm for cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) has evolved over recent years from using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Some randomized trials suggest decreased rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in CAT patients treated with DOACs compared to LMWH but also reported increased rates of bleeding. The Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center has been treating cancer thrombosis in a centralized CAT clinic since 2014. Here we report our rates of bleeding and recurrent VTE in cancer patients treated with anticoagulation. Methods: We prospectively followed cancer patients referred to our clinic from 8/2014-10/2019. A total of 1548 patients were referred to the clinic, of whom 462 were diagnosed with an acute VTE. VTE events, including deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and visceral thrombosis, were noted. The comparison of bleeding rates (defined using ISTH criteria for major and clinically relevant non major bleeding, CRNMB) among treatment groups (LMWH vs DOACs) was examined using chi-square test. Rate of recurrent VTE was analyzed using a competing model in which death was treated as a competing risk. Results: The study population comprised 462 patients with acute VTE with a mean age of 62.67±12.23 and 51.8 % males. Of these, 234 (52.9%) received LMWH, 161(36.4%) received DOACs, and 47 (10.6%) received other agents including warfarin for initial anticoagulation. Overall, the 6-month, 1 year, and 2-year VTE recurrence rate was 5.9%, 6.6%, 7.9%, respectively. Recurrent VTE rates were similar for LMWHs, DOACs and other agents (P&gt;0.05). Of 368 patients for whom follow-up data was available, 74 (16.7%) had bleeding event , of which 25 (33.8%) had major bleeding and 49 (66.4%) had CRNMB at 6 month follow-up with no difference across three treatment groups (p=0.56). Conclusion: In this real-world practice setting, rates of recurrent VTE and bleeding were similar for DOACs and LMWH suggesting that with careful patient selection the concern for higher bleeding with DOACs in cancer patients can be safely overcome. Disclosures McCrae: Momenta Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Rigel: Consultancy; Dova: Consultancy. Khorana:Merck: Research Funding; Medscape: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Pharmacyte: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Array: Other: Research funding (to institution); Janssen: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Leap: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document