Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Deferasirox (Exjade®) In Transfused Patients with Sickle Cell Disease Treated for up to 5 Years

Abstract Abstract 845 Background: Transfusion therapy can effectively treat many complications associated with sickle cell disease (SCD), but iron overload will develop without iron chelation therapy. Despite long-term transfusion requirements, long-term data for iron chelation in SCD are limited. The oral iron chelator, deferasirox, effectively reduced iron burden in SCD patients aged ≥2 years during 1 year of treatment (Vichinsky et al. Br J Haematol 2007). This 5-year follow-up is the first report of long-term deferasirox treatment in SCD patients. Methods: Eligible patients that completed the 1-year core study (randomized to deferasirox [deferasirox cohort] or deferoxamine [crossover cohort]) entered the 4- year extension. All received deferasirox while continuing their regular transfusion regimen. Deferasirox dose in the extension was initially based on serum ferritin (SF) trends in the core study (deferasirox cohort) or transfusion requirements (crossover cohort). Dose adjustments were based on monthly SF and safety assessments (investigator-reported adverse events [AEs] and centrally processed lab parameters). Growth and sexual development (Tanner staging) were assessed annually. Results: Of the patients in the deferasirox (n=132) and crossover (n=53) cohorts that received ’1 deferasirox dose during the core or extension, 43 (33%) and 19 (36%) patients, respectively, completed the extension. Reasons for discontinuation included withdrawal of consent (n=44, 23.8%), loss to follow-up (n=17, 9.2%) and AEs (n=14, 7.6%). Three deaths occurred, all in the extension (intraventricular hemorrhage, n=2; intracranial bleed post liver transplantation, n=1); none considered by investigators to be deferasirox-related. Mean dose during the study was 18.7 ± 6.5 and 21.2 ± 5.3 mg/kg/day in the deferasirox and crossover cohorts, respectively. Investigator-assessed drug-related AEs (≥5% overall) included nausea (14.6%), diarrhea (10.8%), increased blood creatinine (5.9%) and vomiting (5.4%). Generally, these AEs were manageable and transient, and decreased in frequency over time. Serious AEs were reported in 70.8% of patients overall and were mostly related to the underlying disease. Serious investigator-assessed drug-related AEs were reported in 8 patients (6.1%) in the deferasirox cohort and 1 patient (1.9%) in the crossover cohort. In the deferasirox and crossover cohorts respectively, 9 (6.8%) patients and 1 (1.9%) patient had 2 consecutive serum creatinine level increases >33% above baseline and >upper limit of normal (ULN). Median creatinine clearance remained stable within normal range throughout the study. One patient from each cohort had alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >10 × ULN on 2 consecutive visits; both had ALT values ≤ULN at the start of deferasirox treatment. In 37 patients with data available before and after dose increases to ≥30 mg/kg/day, no clinically relevant differences were observed in AE profile or laboratory parameters before and after dose increase. Deferasirox had no adverse effect on pediatric growth and adolescent sexual development. Overall, median SF levels in patients who received deferasirox treatment for ≥4 years decreased significantly from 3410 to 3108 ng/mL at end of study (median absolute change, –591 ng/mL, P=0.027; n=67). Decreases in SF were more pronounced when mean deferasirox dose increased to >20 mg/kg/day (Figure 1). In the deferasirox cohort, the median absolute change in SF levels from start of deferasirox to end-of-study was greater in patients aged ≥16 than 2–<16 years (–476 vs –156 ng/mL) reflecting low 1st-year deferasirox doses and conservative dose escalation in pediatric patients. Conclusions: This is the first study to report that deferasirox can significantly decrease SF levels over the long-term in SCD patients without evidence of renal toxicity. Treatment for up to 5 years was associated with a clinically manageable safety profile, without progressive decreases in median creatinine clearance, which remained within normal range. The modest, but statistically significant, decrease in SF is most likely due to under-dosing in the first 2 years and variability in SF related to disease factors. Patients titrated to an appropriate dose had a clinically relevant decrease in SF, highlighting the need to adjust dose, usually to >20 mg/kg/day, to achieve negative iron balance. Disclosures: Vichinsky: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Apotex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Hemaquest: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bernaudin:Novartis: Investigator for SCD deferasirox (Exjade). Forni:Novartis: Research Funding. Gardner:Novartis: Research Funding. Hassell:Novartis: Research Funding. Heeney:Novartis: Research Funding. Kutlar:Novartis: Research Funding. Lane:Novartis: Research Funding. Mathias:Novartis: Research Funding. Porter:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Tebbi:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Wilson:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Griffel:Novartis: Employment. Deng:Novartis: Employment. Giannone:Novartis: Employment. Coates:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Sickle-Cell Disease Patients' Attitudes Towards Their Treatment with Hydroxycarbamide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125673 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1013-1013

Author(s):

Frédéric Galactéros ◽

Ersi Voskaridou ◽

Anoosha Habibi ◽

Giovanna Cannas ◽

Laure Joseph ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sickle Cell Disease ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Sickle Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Fetal Hemoglobin ◽

Treatment Discontinuation ◽

Cell Disease ◽

Advisory Committees

Hydroxyurea (HU) is approved in the EU and USA for prevention of vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) including acute chest syndromes (ACS) in patients over 2 years with sickle-cell disease (SCD). The major benefits of HU in SCD are directly related to its abilities to increase HbF, decrease sickling of red blood cells and hemolysis, leading to reduction of vaso-occlusive episodes, need for blood transfusions and consequently reduction of morbidity and mortality. Adherence to the treatment is paramount for effectiveness, but in spite of proven benefits, barriers to adherence persist.[1] ESCORT-HU study (European Sickle Cell Disease COhoRT - HydroxyUrea), is a multicentric, prospective, non-interventional European study designed to evaluate the safety profile of HU in real life. Patients were enrolled from January 2009 to June 2017 with a follow-up of up to 10 years. All interruptions and resumptions of HU treatment exceeding 15 days were recorded in this study. We hereby present the analysis of the group of patients who self-discontinued HU at least once during the study before informing their caregiver, with a view to identify potential barriers to long-term adherence. In total, 1906 patients were enrolled in ESCORT-HU from 63 centers in France, Germany, Greece and Italy. Of these, 619 patients (32%) stopped HU for over 15 days at least once, and around a third (11% of all patients) were due to patient's will. The mean duration of HU treatment before the first discontinuation was 4.8 ± 5.1 years. Data are summarized in table 1. Compared to the rest of the cohort, the 'treatment discontinuation' group had similar distribution by gender and indication for HU prescription, but a higher proportion of adults stopped HU more than 15 days. It is notable that the proportion of patients with SC genotype was higher in the 'treatment discontinuation' group (4.5% vs 1.7%). The patients in the 'treatment discontinuation' group had more frequent SCD symptoms before enrolment in the study (table 2). Hematological and clinical improvement compared to the baseline was observed in both groups. However, average mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) and Fetal Hemoglobin percentage (HbF%) were lower and mean percentages of patients with SCD symptoms were higher over the three years of follow-up in the 'treatment discontinuation' group, suggesting that HU daily dose was insufficient (table 2). Sixty patients have no treatment resumption date reported which suggest a permanent interruption of their treatment. Among them 32% preferred to switch to another HU medicinal product and 13% have safety issue (table 3). Understanding and managing self-discontinuation of HU before taking medical advice is challenging for the physician. It is tempting to speculate that it may be due, at least in part, to lack of effectiveness potentially due to an underdosage of the treatment. Resistance to the treatment may also be suggested based on past literature data revealing a great variability in the response (determined by HbF%) to HU therapy. There is evidence that genetic modifiers affect individual response to HU.[2],[3] Finally, weariness from long-term use may also explain the patient's wish to discontinue HU. But treatment at optimal effective should be the primary goal of caregivers. [1]Smaldone A., Manwani D., Green NS, Greater number of perceived barriers to hydroxyurea associated with poorer health-related quality of life in youth with sickle cell disease, Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 [2] Steinberg MH, Voskaridou E, Kutlar A, Loukopoulos D, Koshy M, et al. (2003). Concordant fetal hemoglobin response to hydroxyurea in siblings with sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol 72: 121-126 [3] Ware RE, Despotovic JM, Mortier NA, Flanagan JM, He J, et al. (2011) Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics of hydroxyurea treatment for children with sickle cell anemia. Blood 118: 4985-4991 Disclosures Galactéros: Addmedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Voskaridou:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Protagonist: Research Funding; Genesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acceleron: Consultancy, Research Funding; Addmedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cannas:Addmedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Nonmyeloablative Transplant for Sickle Cell Disease Does Not Lead to Kidney Dysfunction Post-HSCT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153230 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 984-984

Author(s):

Emily Limerick ◽

Santosh L. Saraf ◽

Neal Jeffries ◽

Farah O'Boyle ◽

Clarissa Diamantidis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Function ◽

Kidney Disease ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Disease ◽

Normal Range ◽

Kidney Dysfunction ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Matched Sibling

Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative therapy for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Though HSCT can reverse the SCD phenotype, both acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been associated with HSCT. SCD alters renal function thus the impact of HSCT on renal function in SCD patients is a critical area of exploration. Here, we report the effect of HSCT on renal function in people with SCD. This study analyzes data from 195 patients who received HLA-matched sibling or haploidentical HSCT for SCD at Imperial College London (ICL), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). The former is a pediatric cohort and all sites employed a nonmyeloablative conditioning. Patients' renal function was assessed at baseline and annually thereafter for up to 3-years. We examined the prevalence of CKD before and after HSCT, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) trends after HSCT, and the incidence of AKI within 100 days of HSCT. We defined and staged AKI according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria; we calculated eGFR with the CKD- epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation for adults and Bedside Schwartz for children. The median eGFR declined annually but remained within the normal range throughout the follow-up period: the baseline median eGFR was 138 ml/min/1.73m 2 and declined by 7 in the first year of follow-up and by additional decreases of 5 and 3.6 ml/min/1.73m 2 in subsequent years (p-values of 0.07, 0.0002, and 0.0002 for years 1, 2, and 3 for comparison to baseline from regression model of eGFR). No differences in eGFR were seen for covariates in the model: haploidentical vs. matched sibling, engraftment status, gender, or site. The downward eGFR trend may represent an improvement in renal function toward normal as hyperfiltration (eGFR ≥150 ml/min/1.73m 2) was present in 28% of patients at baseline and steadily declined to 7% by 3 years post-HSCT. There was a corresponding increase in patients with normal eGFR (60-149 ml/min/1.73m 2) from 59% at baseline to 88% at 3 years post-HSCT. Among the ICL and NIH cohorts (UIC excluded due to use of a different AKI determination strategy), 58% of patients developed AKI in the early post-HSCT period. 67% of AKI cases were mild, stage 1; 25% were moderate, stage 2; and 8% were severe, stage 3 AKI. This study demonstrates that HSCT in patients with SCD is associated with a transient increase in UACR but not associated with a significant increase in CKD prevalence by 3-years post-HSCT. The stability of UACR compared to baseline by the 3-year time point suggests that even more mild renal damage may stabilize after HSCT. While there is a substantial decline in eGFR from baseline to each annual follow-up, the proportion of patients whose eGFR was in the normal range increased as the prevalence of hyperfiltration decreased. Finally, while AKI occurred in more than half the patients in our cohort, the preponderance developed only mild AKI. Therefore, our data indicate that nonmyeloablative HSCT for SCD does not lead to significant kidney dysfunction post-HSCT. Disclosures Saraf: Pfizer: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Diamantidis: United Health Group: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Clinical and Biological Characteristics and Outcomes of Richter Transformation : A French Multicenter Study from the Filo Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128053 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4112-4112

Author(s):

Charline Moulin ◽

Romain Morizot ◽

Thomas Remen ◽

Hélène Augé ◽

Florian Bouclet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Long Term Survivors ◽

First Line Treatment

Introduction: About 2 to 10% of patients (pts) diagnosed with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, so-called Richter transformation (RT)) over long-term follow-up. The outcomes of pts with RT are variable and poorly understood and there is no consensus on the best therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, outcomes and factors predictive of survival in a large series of RT from the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO). Methods: Biopsy-confirmed RT (limited to DLBCL and excluding Hodgkin lymphoma) diagnosed from 2001 to 2018 were identified from eight FILO centers. Clinical and biological characteristics of CLL and RT at diagnosis, including cytogenetics, clonal relation with the pre-existing CLL, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status, cell of origin (COO) analyzed by immunohistochemistry and RT score (Tsimberidou AM et al, J Clin Oncol, 2006) were analyzed as well as treatment and outcomes. Overall survivals (OS) were defined as time from CLL and RT diagnosis to death from any cause and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4. Results: A total of 70 CLL pts who developed RT were identified. The median age at CLL diagnosis was 62 years old (range 35-82), and 50 (71.4 %) were male. The median time to transformation was 5.5 years (range 0 to 22 years), with 12 simultaneous diagnosis of CLL and RT. Prior to RT, 20 (29%) pts had not been treated for CLL, 50 received one (n=21) or more (n= 29) line of treatment ; 6 pts had received a novel agent (ibrutinib, idelalisib or venetoclax). The median age at RT diagnosis was 68 years old (range 42-88). All biopsies were centrally reviewed; 38/58 pts (66%) had elevated LDH (>1.5N) ; 35/65 pts (54 %) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm); 10/54 (18.5%) pts had del(17p) or TP53 mutation ; 9/42 pts (21%) had a complex karyotype (at least 3 abnormalities). The CLL and RT were clonally related in 27/27 (100%) tested pts. COO by Hans algorithm was non germinal center B cell-like (GCB) in 26/28 pts (93%). EBV was positive or detected in 5/40 (12.5%) pts. The median of Ki67 positivity was 70% (range 30% to 100%). The RT score (based at RT diagnosis on ECOG performance status 2-4, LDH >1.5 x normal, platelets<100 x 109/L, tumor size >5 cm and >1 prior therapy for CLL) was : low risk in 17 pts (31%), low-intermediate risk in 10 pts (19%), high-intermediate risk in 14 pts (25%) and high risk in 14 pts (25%). The most common first-line treatment of RT was immunochemotherapy (n=57, 87%) including R-CHOP-like regimen (n=48, 73%). Autologous or allogeneic transplantation was performed for 7 pts (11%). Response to first-line treatment was complete or partial response in 26 pts (40%), and stable disease or progression in 39 pts (60%). After a median follow-up of 8 years, 51/64 pts (80%) have died. The main causes of death were progressive DLBCL (n=36, 71%), infection (n=8, 16%) or progressive CLL (n=2, 4%). The median OS of the cohort from CLL and RT diagnosis (Figure 1) were 7.8 years and 9.5 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with TP53 disruption at CLL stage, low platelets count, elevated LDH, elevated beta2-microglobulin, high ECOG score, high RT score, EBV positivity and absence of response to first-line RT treatment had worse OS. The ECOG score, platelets count and TP53 disruption remain significant in multivariate Cox-regression. Last, we compared the clinical and biological parameters of two Richter groups defined as: (i) short-term survivors (<12 months, n = 34) and (ii) long-term survivors (>48 months, n = 18). Long survival was significantly associated with elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to RT first-line treatment. Discussion: The clinical outcomes of RT patients is poor and novel treatment options are needed. However, a group of long-term survivors was identified, characterized by elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to immunochemotherapy. Disclosures Leblond: Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Thieblemont:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Kyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cymbalista:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Guièze:Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Broseus:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Feugier:gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Conventional Immunochemotherapy (R-CHOEP) Vs High-Dose Immunochemotherapy (R-MegaCHOEP) in Younger Patients with High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: 10-Year Long-Term Follow-up of a German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA) Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123637 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1589-1589

Author(s):

Fabian Frontzek ◽

Marita Ziepert ◽

Maike Nickelsen ◽

Bettina Altmann ◽

Bertram Glass ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Scientific Advisory Board ◽

Scientific Advisory

Introduction: The R-MegaCHOEP trial showed that dose-escalation of conventional chemotherapy necessitating autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) does not confer a survival benefit for younger patients (pts) with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the Rituximab era (Schmitz et al., Lancet Oncology 2012; 13, 1250-1259). To describe efficacy and toxicity over time and document the long-term risks of relapse and secondary malignancy we present the 10-year follow-up of this study. Methods: In the randomized, prospective phase 3 trial R-MegaCHOEP younger pts aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk (aaIPI 2-3) aggressive B-cell lymphoma were assigned to 8 cycles of CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubcine, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone) or 4 cycles of dose-escalated high-dose therapy (HDT) necessitating repetitive ASCT both combined with Rituximab. Both arms were stratified according to aaIPI, bulky disease, and center. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). All analyses were calculated for the intention-to-treat population. This follow-up report includes molecular data based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC (IHC: 31/92 positive [40-100%], FISH: 14/103 positive), BCL2 (IHC: 65/89 positive [50-100%], FISH: 23/111 positive) and BCL6 (IHC: 52/86 positive [30-100%], FISH: 34/110 positive) and data on cell of origin (COO) classification according to the Lymph2CX assay (GCB: 53/88; ABC: 24/88; unclassified: 11/88). Results: 130 pts had been assigned to R-CHOEP and 132 to R-MegaCHOEP. DLBCL was the most common lymphoma subtype (~80%). 73% of pts scored an aaIPI of 2 and 27% an aaIPI of 3. 60% of pts had an initial lymphoma bulk and in 40% more than 1 extranodal site was involved. After a median observation time of 111 months, EFS at 10 years was 57% (95% CI 47-67%) in the R-CHOEP vs. 51% in the R-MegaCHOEP arm (42-61%) (hazard ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8, p=0.228), overall survival (OS) after 10 years was 72% (63-81%) vs. 66% (57-76%) respectively (p=0.249). With regard to molecular characterization, we were unable to detect a significant benefit for HDT/ASCT in any subgroup analyzed. In total, 16% of pts (30 pts) relapsed after having achieved a complete remission (CR). 23% of all relapses (7 pts) showed an indolent histology (follicular lymphoma grade 1-3a) and 6 of these pts survived long-term. In contrast, of 23 pts (77%) relapsing with aggressive DLBCL or unknown histology 18 pts died due to lymphoma or related therapy. The majority of relapses occurred during the first 3 years after randomization (median time: 22 months) while after 5 years we detected relapses only in 5 pts (3% of all 190 pts prior CR). 11% of pts were initially progressive (28 pts) among whom 71% (20 pts) died rapidly due to lymphoma. Interestingly, the remaining 29% (8 pts) showed a long-term survival after salvage therapy (+/- ASCT); only 1 pt received allogeneic transplantation. The frequency of secondary malignancies was very similar in both treatment arms (9% vs. 8%) despite the very high dose of etoposide (total 4g/m2)in the R-MegaCHOEP arm. We observed 2 cases of AML and 1 case of MDS per arm. In total 70 pts (28%) have died: 30 pts due to lymphoma (12%), 22 pts therapy-related (11 pts due to salvage therapy) (9%), 8 pts of secondary neoplasia (3%), 5 pts due to concomitant disease (2%) and 5 pts for unknown reasons. Conclusions: This 10-year long-term follow-up of the R-MegaCHOEP trial confirms the very encouraging outcome of young high-risk pts following conventional chemotherapy with R-CHOEP. High-dose therapy did not improve outcome in any subgroup analysis including molecular high-risk groups. Relapse rate was generally low. Pts with aggressive relapse showed a very poor long-term outcome while pts with indolent histology at relapse survived long-term. Secondary malignancies occurred; however, they were rare with no excess leukemias/MDS following treatment with very high doses of etoposide and other cytotoxic agents. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Figure Disclosures Nickelsen: Roche Pharma AG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Roche: Honoraria. Truemper:Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Held:Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Dreyling:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: scientific advisory board; Sandoz: Other: scientific advisory board; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Other: scientific advisory board. Viardot:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenwald:MorphoSys: Consultancy. Lenz:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Employment, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Schmitz:Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Equity Ownership; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

ABVD Versus Escalated Beacopp in Advanced Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results from a Retrospective, Multicenter European Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128198 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1565-1565 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Patrizia Mondello ◽

Irene Dogliotti ◽

Jan-Paul Bohn ◽

Federica Cavallo ◽

Simone Ferrero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

High Risk Patients ◽

Risk Patients

Purpose: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable disease even in advanced-stage, with >90% of long-term survivors. Currently, the standard of care is ABVD (doxorubicin, etoposide, vinblastine and dacarbazine), as it is less toxic and as effective as other more intensive chemotherapy regimens. Alternatively, BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone) has been proposed as front-line intensified regimen with a better initial disease control and prolonged time to relapse when compared to ABVD. However, this advantage is associated with higher rates of severe hematologic toxicity, treatment-related deaths, secondary neoplasms and infertility. To date, the debate regarding which regimen should be preferred as first line for advanced-stage HL is still ongoing. To shed some light on this open question we compared efficacy and safety of both regimens in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: From October 2009 to October 2018, patients with HL stage III-IV treated with either ABVD or BEACOPP escalated (BEACOPPesc) were retrospectively assessed in 7 European cancer centers. Results: A total of 372 consecutive patients were included in the study. One-hundred and ten patients were treated with BEACOPPesc and 262 with ABVD. The baseline characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly, except for a higher rate of high-risk patients in the BEACOPPesc group in contrast to the ABVD one (47% vs 18%; p= 0.003). Complete response rate (CR) assessed by PET imaging at the end of the second cycle was 67% and 78% for the ABVD and BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.003), respectively. Thirteen patients of the ABVD group achieved stable disease (SD) and 6 had a progression disease (PD). On the other hand, 4 of the patients in the BEACOPPesc group progressed, another 2 interrupted therapy because life-threatening toxicity. At the end of the therapy, CR was 76% in the ABVD group and 85% in the BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.01). A total of 20% patients in the ABVD group and 14% patients in the BEACOPPesc group received consolidation radiotherapy on the mediastinal mass at the dose of 30Gy. After radiotherapy, the number of patients with CR increased to 79% and 87% in the two groups (p= 0.041), respectively. Thirty-nine patients (35%) in the BEACOPPesc group required dose reduction of chemotherapy due to toxicity compared to 12 patients (5%; p= <0.001) in the ABVD group. Overall, the rate of severe toxicities was higher in the BEACOPPesc group in comparison with the ABVD cohort. In particular, there was a significant increased frequency of acute grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events (neutropenia 61% vs 24%; anemia 29% vs 4%; thrombocytopenia 29% vs 3%), febrile neutropenia (29% vs 3%), severe infections (18% vs 3%). Myeloid growth factors were administered to 85% and 59% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD group. Blood transfusions were required in 51% and 6% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD cohort. Progression during or shortly after treatment occurred in 5 patients in the BEACOPPesc group (4%) and in 16 patients in the ABVD group (6%; p= 0.62). Among the 96 patients who achieved a CR after BEACOPPesc and radiotherapy, 8 relapsed (8%), compared to 29 of 208 patients in the ABVD group (14%; p= 0.04). At a median follow-up period of 5 years, no statistical difference in progression free survival (PFS; p=0.11) and event-free survival (EFS; p=0.22) was observed between the BEACOPPesc and ABVD cohorts. Similarly, overall survival (OS) did not differ between the two groups (p=0.14). The baseline international prognostic score (IPS <3 vs ≥ 3) significantly influenced the EFS with an advantage for the high-risk group treated with BEACOPPesc (Figure 1A; p=0.03), but not the PFS (Figure 1B; p=0.06) and OS (Figure 1C; p=0.14). During the follow-up period, in the BEACOPPesc group one patient developed myelodysplasia and one acute leukemia. Second solid tumors developed in one patient in the ABVD group (lung cancer) and one in BEACOPPesc group (breast cancer). Conclusion: We confirm that the ABVD regimen is an effective and less toxic therapeutic option for advanced-stage HL. Although BEACOPP results in better initial tumor control especially in high-risk patients, the long-term outcome remains similar between the two regimens. Disclosures Ferrero: EUSA Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Martinelli:BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Willenbacher:European Commission: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Myelom- und Lymphomselbsthilfe Österreich: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Science: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IQVIA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; oncotyrol: Employment, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Fujimoto: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tirol Program: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Rituximab Plus Three Cycles of Dexamethasone In the Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP): a Pilot Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3697.3697 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3697-3697

Author(s):

Rebecca Elstrom ◽

Soo Y. Lee ◽

James B. Bussel

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Pilot Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Initial Treatment ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Almost All

Abstract Abstract 3697 Introduction: Rituximab has been a useful treatment for patients with ITP; many hundreds of patients have been treated. 30–40% of patients will achieve a complete remission (CR: platelet count >150 × 109/l) with initial treatment and, of this group, the CR will last at least a year in almost all patients. However, emerging data suggests that at least 40% of these patients in CR will relapse between 1 and 3 years from initial treatment suggesting that long-term “cures” only occur in 20% of the initial patients. Therefore it would be desirable if CR's could be achieved in more patients and especially if these would be durable in more than 20%. One approach would be to use rituximab maintenance, however it results in suppression of B-cells for more than 2 years. Dexamethasone has also been used to achieve “cure” in ITP especially in adults at or near diagnosis. Cheng's study suggested that approximately 50% of patients would achieve a long-term response with only one 4-day cycle of high dose (40 mg/day) dexamethasone (N Engl J Med, 2003). A follow up study from GIMEMA suggested that 3–4 cycles of dexamethasone would be better than 1 cycle (Blood, 2007). Finally, Zaja's study suggested that rituximab plus one cycle of dexamethasone was superior to dexamethasone alone with a > 50% CR rate at 6 months (Blood, 2010). Therefore, we elected to perform a pilot study to explore the combination of rituximab with three cycles of dexamethasone at 14 day intervals. Methods: Patients with ITP with platelet counts < 30,000 off therapy and in need of treatment were enrolled. The standard dose (4 infusions of 375mg/m2) rituximab was given on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 and dexamethasone 40 mg (adjusted for size) on days 1–4, 15–18, and 29–32. Results: Fourteen patients between the ages of 4 and 53 years with ITP were treated with rituximab and dexamethasone (R&D) (Table 1). All had received previous steroid therapy as well as other treatments. The median platelet count was 40,000 at initiation of rituximab (range 7,000-230,000); several patients with low counts started with dexamethasone prior to initiating Rituximab to sustain their counts during initial treatment. Patients received rituximab weekly for between 2 and 4 doses and dexamethasone for either 2 or 3 courses at intervals between 1 and 8 weeks (median 2 week intervals). A summary of the results is shown in table 2 demonstrating short-lived platelet increases in response to dexamethasone in almost all patients. With short follow up, there were 7 CR's, 3 PR's and 4 NR's. If this was divided by duration of ITP prior to R&D, there were 4 CR's and 1 NR for ≤ 12 months and 3 CR, 3 PR, and 3 NR for > 12 months. More of the children who were treated had chronic disease than did adults explaining their apparently poorer response. Observed toxicities included hyperglycemia, grade 1 and 2 liver function abnormalities, weight gain, and 1 episode of colitis requiring hospitalization. Three patients opted to skip the third cycle of dexamethasone. Conclusion: A regimen of rituximab + 2–3 courses of dexamethasone is active in patients with pretreated ITP with appreciable but usually manageable toxicity. It appears to yield superior results if administered to patients within one year of diagnosis. This combination merits further exploration in a prospective clinical trial. Disclosures: Bussel: Portola: Consultancy; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cangene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Stem Cell Transplantation Can Provide Durable Disease Control in Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasia (BPDC): A Retrospective Study From the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3077.3077 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3077-3077

Author(s):

Sascha Dietrich ◽

Damien Roos-Weil ◽

Ariane Boumendil ◽

Emanuelle Polge ◽

Jian-Jian Luan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 3077 Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDC), formerly known as blastic NK cell lymphoma, is a rare hematopoietic malignancy preferentially involving the skin, bone marrow and lymph nodes. The overall prognosis of BPDC is dismal. Most patients show an initial response to acute leukemia-like chemotherapy, but relapses with subsequent drug resistance occur in virtually all patients resulting in a median overall survival of only 9–13 months. However, anecdotal long-term remissions have been reported in young patients who received early myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). We therefore performed a retrospective analysis of patients identified in the EBMT registry in order to evaluate the outcome of autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) or alloSCT for BPDC. Eligible were all patients who had been registered with a diagnosis of BPDC or Blastic NK cell lymphoma and had received autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) or alloSCT in 2000–2009. Centres were contacted to provide a written histopathology and immunophenotyping report and information about treatment and follow-up details. Patients who did not have a diagnostic score ≥ 2 as proposed by Garnache-Ottou et al. (BJH 2009) were excluded. RESULTS: Overall, 139 patients could be identified in the database who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (alloSCT 100, autoSCT 39). Of 74 patients for whom the requested additional information could be obtained, central review confirmed the diagnosis of BPDC in 39 patients (34 alloSCT, 5 autoSCT). The 34 patients who had undergone alloSCT had a median age of 41 years (range: 10–70 years), were transplanted from a related (n=11) or unrelated donor (n=23); received peripheral blood stem cells (n=9), bone marrow stem cells (n=19) or cord blood (n=6); and had been treated with a reduced intensity conditioning regimen (RIC, n=9) or myeloablative conditioning (MAC, n=25). Nineteen of 34 patients were transplanted in CR1. After a median follow up time of 28 months (range: 4–77+ months), 11 patients relapsed (median time to relapse: 8 months, range: 2–27 months) of whom 8 died due to disease progression. 9 patients died in the absence of relapse. No relapse occurred later than 27 months after transplant. Median disease free survival (DFS) was 15 months (range: 4–77+ months) and median overall survival (OS) was 22 months (range: 8–77+ months; Figure 1a). However, long-term remissions of up to 77 months after alloSCT could be observed. Patients allografted in CR1 tended to have a superior DFS (p=0.119) and OS (p=0.057; Figure 1b). MAC was associated with a better OS (p=0.001) which was attributable to the significantly higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate of patients after RIC (p=0.014), who had been significantly older (age RIC: 56 years, age MAC: 36 years, p=0.0014). The relapse rate was not different in patients after RIC and MAC, respectively. However, there was no survivor after RIC. Median age in the autoSCT group was 47 years (range: 14–62 years). Three of 5 patients were transplanted in CR1 of whom 1 patient relapsed after 8 months, 1 patient experienced treatment related mortality and 1 patient remained in CR for 28 months. The 2 remaining patients had more advanced disease at autoSCT and relapsed 4 and 8 months thereafter. CONCLUSION: AlloSCT is effective in BPDC and might provide curative potential in this otherwise incurable disease, especially when performed in CR1. However, it remains to be shown by prospective studies if the potential benefit of alloSCT in BPDC is largely due to conditioning intensity, or if there is a relevant contribution of graft-versus-leukemia activity. Disclosures: Tilly: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety in COMFORT-II, a Phase 3 Study Comparing Ruxolitinib with Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis: 5-Year Final Study Results

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.59.59 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 59-59 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Claire N. Harrison ◽

Alessandro M. Vannucchi ◽

Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽

Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali ◽

Heinz Gisslinger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Spleen Volume ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Final Study ◽

Study Results

Abstract BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib (RUX) is a potent JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor that has demonstrated rapid and durable improvements in splenomegaly and symptoms as well as improved survival in the two phase 3 COMFORT studies in patients (pts) with myelofibrosis (MF). In COMFORT-II, significantly more pts achieved the primary endpoint (a ≥ 35% decrease in spleen volume from baseline at wk 48) with RUX compared with best available therapy (BAT) (28% vs 0%; P ˂ .0001). The 3-year follow-up confirmed that spleen volume reductions were sustained and RUX treatment remained tolerable with long-term use. Here, we report final study results on longer-term safety and efficacy after 5 years of RUX treatment in COMFORT-II. METHODS: COMFORT-II is a randomized (2:1), open-label phase 3 study of RUX vs BAT in pts with intermediate-2- or high-risk primary MF, post-PV MF, or post-ET MF. Pts initially received RUX 15 or 20 mg bid based on their platelet counts at baseline (100-200 and > 200 x 109/L, respectively), and doses were individually titrated to maximize safety and efficacy. Pts were allowed to cross over from the BAT arm to receive RUX upon protocol-defined progression (primarily progressive splenomegaly, a ≥ 25% increase in spleen volume from on-study nadir). All pts randomized to BAT had crossed over or discontinued by Nov 2011. The date of final database lock for the study is 20 Apr 2015. RESULTS: Pts were randomized to RUX (n = 146) or BAT (n = 73). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms and have been described previously (Harrison, N Engl J Med, 2012); disease and hematologic characteristics were representative of a population of pts with advanced primary or secondary MF. At study completion (median follow-up, 4.3 years), 39 pts (26.7%) in the RUX arm and 11 of the 45 pts (24.4%) who crossed over from BAT completed 5 years of on-study treatment. Primary reasons for premature discontinuation before 5 years were adverse events (AEs; 24.0%) and disease progression (21.9%) in the RUX arm and withdrawal of consent and other in the BAT arm (12.3% each). Overall 78 pts (53.4%) in the RUX arm achieved a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline at any time during treatment; the median duration of maintenance of spleen volume reduction was 3.2 years. The K-M estimated probability of maintaining this reduction was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.38-0.62) at 3 years and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.35-0.60) at 5 years. Approximately one-third of evaluable JAK2 V617F-positive pts had a ˃ 20% reduction in allele burden at 3.2 years (38.3%) and 3.7 years (31.0%). With RUX treatment, 23 pts (15.8%) had improved fibrosis (including 4 who improved to grade 0 from baseline fibrosis grades of 1 [n = 1], 2 [n = 2], and 3 [n = 1]), 47 pts (32.2%) had stable fibrosis, and 27 (18.5%) had a worsening at their last assessment. There was no relevant increase in the incidence of AEs with longer exposure (median: RUX arm, 2.6 years; BAT arm, 0.87 years; RUX after crossover, 1.2 years) compared with previous reports. The most commonly reported AEs in pts who received RUX any time (randomized treatment, extension phase or after cross over from BAT) were thrombocytopenia (52.4%), anemia (49.2%), diarrhea (35.6%), and peripheral edema (33.0%); grade 3/4 AEs included anemia (22.5%), thrombocytopenia (15.2%), pneumonia (5.8%), general physical health deterioration (4.2%), and dyspnea (4.2%). 8 pts (5.5%) and 5 pts (6.8%) developed leukemia in the RUX and BAT arms, respectively. There were no new or unexpected AEs. Overall, 59 (40.4%) and 35 (47.9%) deaths were reported in the RUX and BAT arms, respectively. Median OS was not reached in the RUX arm and was 4.1 years in the BAT arm. There was a 33% reduction in risk of death with RUX compared with BAT (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.44-1.02; P = .06). The K-M estimated probability of survival at 5 years was 56% with RUX and 44% with BAT. As expected, the confounding effect on OS of crossover from BAT to RUX became apparent in this extended follow up compared with previous analyses; an analysis of OS correcting for crossover will be presented. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS: The immediate benefits of RUX treatment, such as improvements in spleen size, were maintained with long-term therapy. The previously reported OS benefit was maintained, although results are confounded by extensive crossover from the BAT arm following the primary analysis at wk 48, which becomes more apparent with longer follow-up. Long term safety and tolerability was consistent with previous findings. Disclosures Harrison: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Shire: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: Research Funding paid to institution (University of Florence), Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kiladjian:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Novartis: Other: Travel grant; Research Funding paid to institution (Hôpital Saint-Louis et Université Paris Diderot); Novartis: Consultancy. Al-Ali:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Gisslinger:AOP ORPHAN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Geron: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy. Knoops:Novartis: Consultancy. Cervantes:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CTI-Baxter: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy. Jones:Incyte Corporation: Employment. Sun:Incyte Corporation: Employment. Descamps:Novartis Pharma S.A.S: Employment. Stalbovskaya:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gopalakrishna:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Barbui:Novartis: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Long Term Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability (>24 Months) of Twice Daily Dosing of Deferasirox in Transfusion Dependent Thalassemias Who Were Unresponsive to Standard Once Daily Dose

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.958.958 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 958-958

Author(s):

Bunchoo Pongtanakul ◽

Vip Viprakasit

Keyword(s):

Iron Overload ◽

Iron Concentration ◽

Iron Chelation ◽

Once Daily ◽

Term Efficacy ◽

Before And After ◽

Baseline Levels ◽

Median Change

Background: Clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of deferasirox (DFX); a once daily oral iron chelator in transfusion dependent thalassemias (TDT) with iron overload can be achieved by appropriate dosage adjustment based on iron burden and ongoing transfusion iron overload. However, even with recommended DFX dosage, at least 40% of our Thai TDT patients did not appropriately respond to DFX. Patients with unresponsiveness to DFX (UR) was defined as (1) having a rising serum ferritin (SF) trend or (2) having a reduction of SF < 30% of baseline levels (BL) at least 3 consecutive mths, with more than two SF measurements >1500 ng/mL; and (3) receiving once daily DFX at an average dosage > 30 mg/kg/day for at least 6 mths. Previously, twice daily dosing (TWD) of DFX was shown to be effective in patients with UR (Pongtanakul B, et al. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2013) but long term efficacy, safety and tolerability of TWD of DFX is still lacking. Methods: Patients with UR who received TWD of DFX with the same total dose per day > 24 mths were included. CBC, renal function, urine analysis were performed every 3 wks to monitor possible side effect. SF and liver function test were checked every 6 wks. Tolerability and compliance to DFX were evaluated by direct history taking and drug account prescribed. Responsiveness to TWD of DFX (RP) was defined as the patients who showed a decrease of SF or reduction of liver iron concentration (LIC) by MRI > 30% of the BL at 6 or 12 mths. Results: Twenty four TDT patients received TWD of DFX; 4 patients were excluded due to poor compliance and a short follow up period and 4 patients did not meet RP criteria. Sixteen patients were enrolled; 9 male (56%) with a mean (± SD) age of 9.08 ± 3.84 yrs (range 2.1-24.2 yrs). Clinical diagnoses include; Hb E/β thalassemia. (n=12), β thalassemia major (n=3) and Hb Barts hydrops (n=1). Mean follow up time before switching dose were 17.3 ± 7.3 mths. Average SF at BL before DFX and before TWD were 3,039 ± 1,713.7.02 and 3,500 ± 1,403.2 ng/mL, with median % change of SF was +27.58 % (range; -13.4 to +104%). Mean actual DFX dose during 6 mths before switching was 36.3 ± 2.2 mg/kg/day. None had symptoms of gastrointestinal irritation. After TWD, 13 (81.25%) and 16 patients (100%) showed a significant decrease of SF (> 30% of the baseline levels) at 6 and 12 months. Mean SF and median % change of SF at 6 and 12 months after switching were 2,527.56 ± 1,191.80 ng/mL; -29.24 % and 1,695.83 ± 859.16 ng/mL; -53.14%, with statistical significance compared to BL and before switching (p <0.05). Mean transfusion iron load before and after switching were not different (range 0.2-0.4 mg/kg/day). One patient had a SF reduction < 30%, but LIC was significant reduction at 12 months. Nine out of 16 patients were evaluated for LIC; average LIC at BL and at the end of study were reduced from 6.7 to 3.2 mg/g dry wt. None had cardiac T2* < 20 msec. All patients except one tolerated well with DFX at before and after switching (>24 months) with minor adverse events. One patient had severe transaminitis (ALT > 3 times of ULN) but after investigation, this was thought to be result from acute viral hepatitis. This patient could be successfully restarted DFX at the same TWD. Five patients could decrease DFX dosage to < 20 mg/kg/day and switched back to daily dosing (mean dosage was 17.04 mg/kg/day). However, 4 patients, after decreased DFX dosage and switched back to daily dosing; their SF increased and required to increase DFX dosage with TWD to maintain SF. Seven patients continued to receive TWD of DFX with mean dosage was 36.4 mg/kg/day. Mean follow up time after TWD of DFX was 44.1 + 9.8 mths (range 24 - 72 mths). Conclusion: Herein, we show that TWD of DFX effectively reduced iron burden in TDT with iron overload. Safety and tolerability of this dosing are not different from once daily dosing. Most patients could decrease DFX dosage and switched back to once daily dosing when iron burden decreased. However, 25% (4/16) of these patients still required twice daily dosing with higher dosage to maintain optimal body iron levels. Interestingly, 16% (4/24) of our patients who received TWD could not achieve effective iron chelation. This group of patients may represent those who have different pharmacogenetic background that affect directly to efficacy of DFX causing a resistant to iron chelation therapy. This population confirms for improving iron chelation measures by means of a newer iron chelation agent or a combination of DFX with other iron chelation. Disclosures Off Label Use: Twice daily dosing instead of standard daily dosing.

Download Full-text

Update from the Hgb-205 Phase 1/2 Clinical Study of Lentiglobin Gene Therapy: Sustained Clinical Benefit in Severe Hemoglobinopathies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2311.2311 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2311-2311 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jean-Antoine Ribeil ◽

Salima Hacein-Bey-Abina ◽

Emmanuel Payen ◽

Michaela Semeraro ◽

Magrin Elisa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Lentiviral Vector ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Globin Gene ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Study Visit ◽

Transfusion Requirements ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: β-globin gene transfer into hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) has the potential to reduce or eliminate the symptoms of severe sickle cell disease (SCD) and reduce or eliminate transfusion requirements in transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT). LentiGlobin Drug Product (DP) contains autologous CD34+ cells transduced with the BB305 lentiviral vector, which encodes a human β-globin gene containing a single point mutation (AT87Q) designed to confer anti-sickling properties similar to those observed with γ-globin. We previously reported proof of concept for LentiGlobin DP treatment in severe SCD and early data from 4 treated patients with TDT. We now report 18 months of follow-up for the patient with SCD and between 9 and 30 months of follow-up for the 4 patients with TDT. Patients (5-35 years of age) with severe SCD (e.g. ≥2 acute chest syndrome episodes or ≥2 vaso-occlusive crises [VOC] in preceding year/in year prior to regular transfusions) or TDT (≥100mL/kg of packed red blood cells [RBCs] per year) were enrolled. Following mobilization and apheresis (for TDT) or bone marrow harvest (for SCD), autologous CD34+ cells were transduced with the BB305 lentiviral vector. Patients underwent myeloablative conditioning with busulfan prior to infusion of the transduced cells. After infusion, patients were monitored for hematologic engraftment, vector copy number (VCN), and HbAT87Q expression. Disease-specific assessments included transfusion requirements for TDT, or VOCs and hospitalizations for SCD. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and integration site analysis. Results: As of July 2016, 1 patient with severe SCD (male; 13 years old) and 4 patients with TDT (2 male, 2 female; 16-19 years old) have received LentiGlobin DP in Study HGB-205. The median LentiGlobin DP cell dose was 8.9 (range 5.6-13.6) x 106 CD34+ cells/kg with a DP VCN of 1.2 (range: 0.8-2.0) vector copies/diploid genome. Median post-infusion follow-up as of July 6, 2016 is 20.8 months (range 9.5-31.3). All subjects successfully engrafted after receiving LentiGlobin DP, with a median time to neutrophil engraftment of 17 days (range 14-38 days). VCN in peripheral blood has remained generally consistent from Month 3 in all patients with a range of 0.2 to 3.4 at last measurement. The toxicity profile observed from start of conditioning to latest follow-up remains consistent with myeloablative conditioning with single-agent busulfan, with no DP-related ≥Grade 3 AEs or serious AEs and no evidence of clonal dominance reported to date. Three patients with TDT have β0/βE genotypes and 1 is homozygous for the severe β+ mutation IVS1 nt 110 G>A. The 2 patients who have completed the 2-year primary follow-up period (both β0/βE) have not required RBC transfusions for 31 and 28 months, with total Hb of 10.9 and 13.5 g/dL, and HbAT87Q expression of 7.7 and 10.1 g/dL, respectively, at most recent study visit. Iron chelation has been discontinued and phlebotomy initiated for 1 of the patients. The remaining patient with β0/βE genotype has 9 months of follow-up and has not required transfusions since 4 days post-LentiGlobin DP infusion, achieving a total Hb of 11.3 g/dL at last study visit. The patient with the severe IVS1 genotype has 12 months of follow-up and has been free of transfusions for 9 months, with a total Hb of 8.3 g/dL at last study visit. The patient with severe SCD, who prior to study enrollment received regular RBC transfusions, has experienced no clinical symptoms or complications of SCD in the 18 months since treatment, despite discontinuing transfusions 3 months after LentiGlobin DP infusion. Total Hb in this patient was 12.5 g/dL, with 6.6 g/dL HbAT87Q (53%) and 5.7 g/dL HbS (45%) at last study visit. Compared with values at screening, unconjugated bilirubin had dropped 78% (50 to 11 μmol/L), lactate dehydrogenase had dropped 54% (626 to 287 U/L), and reticulocyte count had dropped 45% (238x109/L to 132x109/L) by Month 18. Conclusions: Data from this ongoing Phase 1/2 clinical study suggest that treatment with LentiGlobin DP can result in sustained production of therapeutic HbAT87Q, which ameliorates the clinical and biochemical effects of severe SCD and TDT, with an acceptable safety profile. Gene therapy presents a potentially promising therapy for patients with severe hemoglobinopathies. Further follow-up and additional data from patients are needed to confirm the encouraging results seen to date in this study. Disclosures Ribeil: Bluebirdbio: Consultancy; Addmedica: Research Funding. Payen:bluebird bio: Patents & Royalties. Hermine:Alexion: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AB science: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Asmal:bluebird bio: Employment, Equity Ownership. Joseney-Antoine:bluebird bio: Employment, Equity Ownership. De Montalembert:Addmedica: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Leboulch:bluebird bio, Inc: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Download Full-text