Final Results of a Single Arm Phase III Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Rituximab Administered by Faster Infusion in Patients with Previously Untreated Diffuse Large-B Cell (DLBCL) or Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (FL)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2703-2703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaker R. Dakhil ◽  
Robert Hermann ◽  
Akiko Chai ◽  
Deborah Hurst ◽  
Gregg Fine ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2703 Introduction: For lymphoma patients (pts) receiving rituximab according to the prescribing information the first rituximab infusion typically requires 4−6 hrs and subsequent infusions require 3−4 hrs. Several pilot studies have investigated the feasibility of faster infusion of rituximab, but no phase III trials have prospectively analyzed safety in a larger population. In order to evaluate whether a faster infusion is feasible for the second and subsequent cycles of rituximab plus chemotherapy treatment, a prospective single arm, open-label phase III multicenter single-arm trial was performed to assess the safety of faster rituximab infusion in previously untreated pts with DLBCL and FL. Methods: Previously untreated pts with DLBCL or FL scheduled to receive R-CHOP and R-CVP respectively were eligible for participation in this study. Pts with a history of clinically significant cardiac disease were excluded. Pts received acetaminophen, an antihistamine and the oral steroid component of their chemotherapy regimen before each rituximab infusion. No additional steroid premedication was permitted. The first rituximab infusion was administered at an initial rate of 50 mg/hr and in the absence of toxicity increased by 50 mg/hr to a maximum of 400 mg/hr. Pts with infusion-related SAEs or grade 3/4 IRRs in the first cycle went off study. Rituximab in subsequent cycles was to be administered over a planned duration of 90 minutes: 20% of the total rituximab dose over 30 minutes, and the remaining 80% over the next 60 minutes. The primary outcome of this study was the rate of grade 3/4 IRRs during or within 24 hrs of Cycle 2 Day 1 in pts who received the faster infusion of rituximab. The definition of infusion-related AE required onset within 24 hrs of the start of infusion and encompassed MedDRA terms mapped to a prespecified list of AE terms derived from previous phase III rituximab studies. Secondary endpoints included other AEs, AEs leading to drug discontinuation, deaths, SAEs, and duration of administration (by cycle). Assuming the point estimate of the incidence of grade 3/4 IRRs was no larger than 5%, a sample size of at least 300 pts receiving faster infusion was needed to estimate the incidence with a margin of error of no greater than 2.5%. This sample size also allowed a fatal IRR rate of 1% or higher to be ruled out with a type I error less than 5% if no fatal IRRs were observed in the study. Results: Between July 2008 and November 2010, 451 pts were enrolled at 93 centers in the U.S. 425 pts received the first dose of rituximab at a median infusion duration of 2–0 minutes (92–390 minutes). Fifty-three pts (12.4%) discontinued prior to receiving the faster infusion: 5.6% discontinued the study because of Grade 3/4 IRRs, SAEs (including 5 deaths) and other AEs; and 6.8% discontinued for other reasons. The faster infusion of rituximab was administered starting at cycle 2 to 363 patients (250 R-CHOP, 113 R-CVP). R-CHOP pts had a median age=64 (range 20–86) and stage III-IV=63.4%. R-CVP pts had a median age=65 (range 33–88) and stage III-IV=77.0%. A total of 1764 infusions were administered at the faster rate. The median infusion duration at cycle 2 was 90 minutes (range 60–233) and was maintained over all subsequent cycles. For pts receiving the faster infusion at Cycle 2 Day 1, the rate of grade 3/4 IRR at cycle 2 was 1.1% (4 patients; 95%CI [0.3%, 2.8%]); the events included rash, bronchospasm, hypersensitivity, and abdominal pain. The rate of grade 3/4 IRRs occurring during cycle 2 or beyond was 2.8% (10 patients; 95%CI [1.3%, 5.0%]). IRR of any grade occurred in 38.3% of pts at Cycle 2 Day 1 with a decreased incidence in subsequent cycles. No fatal IRRs were observed. Thirteen deaths occurred on study outside of the infusion period (5 during cycle 1, 8 during or after cycle 2). Conclusion: The target duration of faster infusion was maintained while observing a rate of grade 3/4 IRRs of 1.1% at Cycle 2 and 2.8% at Cycle 2 and beyond with no fatal IRRs. Based on these results, the faster infusion of rituximab in pts without clinically significant cardiac disease who receive the first cycle of rituximab without a grade 3/4 IRR is feasible and associated with a safety profile comparable to historical data for patients with previously untreated DLBCL or FL who receive either R-CHOP or R-CVP. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Rituximab. Treatment of patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL). Chai:Genentech: Employment. Hurst:Genentech: Employment. Fine:Genentech: Employment.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 645-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Paula Marlton ◽  
Umberto Vitolo ◽  
Ola Linden ◽  
John Seymour ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Ocrelizumab is a new humanised anti-CD20 antibody with the potential for enhanced efficacy in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) compared with rituximab due to increased binding affinity for the low-affinity variants of the FcγRIIIa receptor. An open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation study was conducted to evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of ocrelizumab in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory follicular NHL following prior rituximab-containing therapy. Methods: A total of 47 pts with a response (complete response [CR], unconfirmed CR [CRu], partial response [PR]) or stable disease (SD) of ≥6 months’ duration following prior rituximab-containing treatment were enrolled into 3 sequential dose cohorts. Pts received infusions of ocrelizumab q3w at 200 mg/m2 (cohort A), 375 mg/m2 (cohort B) and 750 mg/m2 (cohort C) for up to 8 doses. Response was assessed after 4 doses and after the end of treatment. Results: Fifteen pts were enrolled in cohort A, 16 in cohort B and 16 in cohort C; 60% were male; mean age was 57 years; 78% had stage III/IV disease. At study entry 30%, 50% and 67% had intermediate or high FLIPI score in cohorts A, B and C, respectively. Median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–7); time to progression after last rituximab-containing therapy of <12 months: 47% (cohort A), 31% (cohort B) and 62% (cohort C) of pts. The majority of pts reported ≥1 adverse event (AE) [80–100%, cohorts A-C]; most of these were grade 1/2, with only 6 pts experiencing a grade 3 AE and no grade 4 AEs observed. The most common AEs were infusion-related reactions (IRR; 73%, 75% and 69% in cohorts A, B and C, respectively); only one was grade 3. Two pts discontinued treatment due to toxicity (dyspnoea, IRR). A total of 17 pts responded to ocrelizumab for a response rate (RR) of 36% (13% CR/CRu) across all cohorts. RR by cohort was 27% (13% CR/CRu) for A, 50% (25% CR/CRu) for B and 31% (no CR/CRu) for C. In pts relapsing after prior response (CR/PR) to rituximab-containing therapy (n=40), RRs were 23% (15% CR/CRu), 62% (31% CR/CRu) and 33% (no CR/CRu) in cohorts A, B and C, respectively. Of 6 pts with SD after prior rituximab-containing therapy, 1 pt had a PR, 4 pts had SD and 1 pt progressed. Conclusion: Ocrelizumab is well tolerated at doses up to 750 mg/m2 given q3w; AEs consist mainly of grade 1/2 IRRs. Severe IRRs (grade 3/4) following ocrelizumab occur less frequently than with rituximab. In this heavily and rituximab-pretreated pt population, the RR of 36% is encouraging.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7503-7503 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Schiller ◽  
S. E. Dahlberg ◽  
M. Mehta ◽  
D. H. Johnson

7503 Background: Thalidomide (T) is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor with anti-tumor activity in hematological malignancies. Given that antiangiogenic drugs such as bevacizumab have proven activity in advanced NSCLC, ECOG conducted a phase III study to compare the effects of the addition of thalidomide to paclitaxel/carboplatin/radiation therapy (PC/RT) on overall survival (OS) in pts with newly diagnosed stage III NSCLC. Secondary endpoints included time to progression (PFS) and toxicity. Methods: Pts were required to have inoperable stage IIIA or IIIB (no pleural effusion) NSCLC and a PS of 0 or 1. Pts were randomized to receive 2 cycles of P (225 mg/m2)+ C (AUC=6) every 3 wks or PC + thalidomide starting at 200 mg daily with the possibility of dose escalation. This was followed by weekly C (AUC=2), P (45 mg/m2) and concurrent RT (60 Gy) ± T. Pts on PC/RT + T continued thalidomide for 24 mo. or until disease progression. Results: 277 eligible pts were randomized to PC/RT and 272 pts to PC/RT + T. Median age was 63; 61% of pts had stage IIIB disease, 35% had squamous histology, and 46% were PS 0. The third planned interim analysis was conducted with 403 of 506 planned deaths (73.9%) for full analysis and the trial was stopped early by the ECOG Data Monitoring Committee for futility. The median overall survival for the no T arm was 15.3 mo. (12.4–20.2 mo.) compared to 16.0 mo for the T arm (14.4–18.3 mo.); hazard ratio = 0.985 (0.81–1.19); p = 0.88. Median PFS for the no T arm was 7.6 mo. (6.6–8.7 mo.) compared to 8.0 mo. for the T arm (7.1–9.1 mo.), p>0.05. The most common toxicity on both arms was myelosuppression. 11% of pts on the T arm had a grade 3–5 thrombosis/embolism, compared to <3% on the no T arm. Conclusions: The addition of thalidomide to PC/RT in pts with stage III NSCLC does not provide a clinically significant benefit. [Table: see text]


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (26) ◽  
pp. 4371-4377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Joseph D. Rosenblatt ◽  
Anas Younes ◽  
...  

PurposeTo evaluate the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of dacetuzumab in patients with refractory or recurrent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).Patients and MethodsIn this open-label, dose-escalation phase I study, dacetuzumab was administered to six cohorts of adult patients. In the first cohort, patients received 2 mg/kg weekly for 4 weeks; in all other cohorts, an intrapatient dose-escalation schedule was used with increasing doses up to a maximum of 8 mg/kg. Patients with clinical benefit after one cycle of dacetuzumab were eligible for a second cycle.ResultsIn the 50 patients who received dacetuzumab, no dose dependence of adverse events (AEs) was observed. The most common AEs in ≥ 20% of patients were fatigue, pyrexia, and headache; most were grade 1 or 2. Noninfectious inflammatory eye disorders occurred in 12% of patients. AEs grade ≥ 3 occurred in 30% of patients and included disease progression, anemia, pleural effusion, and thrombocytopenia. Most laboratory abnormalities were grade 1 or 2; transient elevated hepatic aminotransferases occurred in 52% of patients. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity: grade 3 conjunctivitis and transient vision loss in cohort (1), and grade 3 ALT elevation in cohort IV. The MTD of dacetuzumab was not established at the dose levels tested. Six objective responses were reported (one complete response, five partial responses). Tumor size decreased in approximately one third of patients.ConclusionDacetuzumab monotherapy was well tolerated in patients with NHL in doses up to 8 mg/kg/wk. Preliminary response data are encouraging and support additional studies of dacetuzumab in this patient population.


ESMO Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. e000354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahito Kotaka ◽  
Takeharu Yamanaka ◽  
Takayuki Yoshino ◽  
Dai Manaka ◽  
Tetsuya Eto ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant chemotherapy project investigated whether a shorter duration of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy was as effective as 6 months of identical chemotherapy for resected stage III colon cancer. As part of this project, we report safety data from the Japanese ACHIEVE study (JFMC47-1202-C3).Patients and methodsACHIEVE was an open-label, multicentre trial randomising patients with stage III colon cancer to receive 3 m or 6 m of mFOLFOX6/CAPOX after surgery. Choice of regimen was declared before randomisation by a site investigator.ResultsBetween August 2012 and June 2014, 1313 patients were enrolled and, of those, 1277 were analysed for the safety analysis, with 635 in arm 6 (mFOLFOX6, n=158; CAPOX, n=477) and 642 in arm 3 (mFOLFOX6, n=161; CAPOX, n=481). Grade 3 or worse peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) developed in 5%/0.6% of patients receiving mFOLFOX6 in arm 6/3 (p=0.019) and 6%/1% of those receiving CAPOX in arm 6/3 (p<0.001). Similarly, grade 2 or worse PSN developed in 36%/11% of patients receiving mFOLFOX6 in arm 6/3 (p<0.001) and 37%/14% of those receiving CAPOX in arm 6/3 (p<0.001). An association between baseline creatinine clearance (CCr) and adverse events (AEs) was found that patients with CAPOX were significantly more likely to develop AEs ≥grade 3 when they had a CCr ≤50 (OR 1.67; p=0.048).ConclusionsWe confirmed in the Japanese population that the shorter duration of adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in a significant reduction of PSN. In patients with CAPOX, renal function was significantly related to severe AEs.Trial registration numberUMIN000008543, Results.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 450-450
Author(s):  
Mathias J Rummel ◽  
Ann Janssens ◽  
David MacDonald ◽  
Mary-Margaret Keating ◽  
Jan Zaucha ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Despite a variety of treatment options, indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) remains a largely incurable disease with patients experiencing multiple relapses. Both rituximab (RTX) and bendamustine (Benda) are used as single agents for the treatment of relapsed/refractory iNHL. When given in combination to patients with relapsed iNHL, high response rates were observed (Rummel, 2016). Ofatumumab (OFA) is a human, anti-CD20 type-I antibody that binds a distinct epitope from RTX. A phase I/II study showed that OFA has activity in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who relapsed after RTX-containing therapy (Hagenbeek, 2008). Based on these experiences, COMPLEMENT A+B evaluated if OFA+Benda would improve progression-free survival (PFS) compared to Benda alone in unresponsive or progressive iNHL after RTX or RTX-containing regimen. Methods: This phase III, open-label, randomized, global, multi-center study enrolled adult patients (≥18 years) with CD20+ small lymphocytic, marginal zone, lymphophasmacytic and Grades 1-3A FL who had either stable disease after or disease progression during or within 6 months of RTX or RTX-containing regimen. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either OFA+Benda or Benda. Benda (90 mg/m2 in OFA+Benda arm and 120 mg/m2 in Bendaarm) was given on Days 1 and 2 every 21 days for up to 8 cycles. OFA (1000 mg) was given on Day 1 of Benda cycles and then every 28 days for a total of 12 doses. The primary endpoint was PFS as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). Key secondary endpoints included PFS in patients with FL, overall response rates (ORR) and overall survival (OS) in all patients and in patients with FL which were tested hierarchically if the prior endpoint was statistically significant. Results: Overall, 346 patients were enrolled (173 in each arm) in 85 centers across 15 countries. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 arms. Median (range) age was 62 (21-87) years, majority were males (59%) and 69% had FL. Ann Arbor Stage IVA was common (OFA+Benda: 43%; Benda: 42%). Median duration of follow up was 61.1 months. Median treatment duration was longer in the OFA+Benda arm (OFA+Benda: 260 days; Benda: 135 days). Median (range) number of prior RTX therapy was 1 (1-8). In the OFA+Benda arm, 58% and 65% completed treatment with OFA and Benda, respectively, whereas in the Benda arm, 43% completed treatment. The main reason for premature discontinuation of OFA treatment in OFA+Benda arm was adverse events (AEs), 14%. The main reason for premature treatment discontinuation of Benda was AEs (OFA+Benda: 17%; Benda: 27%). Primary analysis was performed after 217 IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. In the OFA+Benda and Benda arms, 61% and 65% of patients, respectively, had PFS events (Figure 1). Median IRC-assessed PFS was 16.7 months in the OFA+Benda arm and 13.8 months in the Benda arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.62, 1.07]; p=0.1390). Similar results were seen in patients with FL where the median IRC-assessed PFS was similar in FL patients - 16.6 months in the OFA+Benda arm and 12.1 months in the Benda arm (HR=0.76, 95% CI [0.55,1.06]; p=0.1076) (Figure 2). IRC-assessed ORR was similar in both arms (OFA+Benda: 73%; Benda: 75%; difference in ORR [95% C]: -1.2% [-10.4%, 8.1]; p=0.8003). Median OS was 58.2 months and 51.8 months in the OFA+Benda and Benda arms, respectively (HR=0.89, 95% CI [0.63, 1.25]; p=0.4968). Frequencies of deaths (OFA+Benda: 38%; Benda: 41%) and on-treatment deaths (OFA+Benda: 7%; Benda: 9%) were similar in both arms. The main cause of death during the study was disease under study (OFA+Benda: 20%; Benda: 15%). Overall, 73% of patients in the OFA+Benda arm and 80% in the Benda arm experienced a ≥ Grade 3 AE. The most common ≥ Grade 3 AEs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and leukopenia (Table 1). Conclusions: No significant improvement in PFS was seen with OFA+Benda as compared with Benda alone for patients with RTX-refractory iNHL. The safety profile for OFA was consistent with prior experience. The difference in outcomes compared to those in the GADOLIN trial (Sehn, 2016) could be due to the differences in drug exposure as patients in the GADOLIN study received maintenance anti-CD 20 therapy for up to 2 years; in the patient population as approximately 80% had FL in GADOLIN versus 69% in COMPLEMENT A+B; and in the mechanism of action of type-1 versus type-2 monoclonal antibody. Disclosures Rummel: Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Symbio: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria. Janssens:Sanofi-Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Ad board, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Ad board, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. MacDonald:Roche Canada: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Keating:Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Davis:Novartis: Employment. Lasher:Novartis: Employment. Lobe:Novartis: Employment. Izquierdo:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Friedberg:Bayer: Honoraria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document