Diabetic Ketoacidosis Updates: Titratable Insulin Infusions and Long-Acting Insulin Early

Background. To compare a titratable insulin infusion order set (vs. nontitratable) and early administration of long-acting insulin in adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Methods. Single health system, retrospective study of adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for DKA. The primary outcomes were insulin infusion duration and ICU/hospital length of stays (LoS). Secondary outcomes included ICU/hospital survival, hypoglycemia, and hypokalemia. Results. 151 patients were included in the titratable versus nontitratable insulin infusion comparison. Patients treated with the titratable insulin had shorter hospitalization (6.4 vs. 10.4 days, p = 0.03 ) and reduced the number hypoglycemic events by over half (20.6% vs. 46.0%, p < 0.01 ). 110 patients were identified to compare overlapping a long-acting insulin for more than 4 h with the insulin infusion versus the standard 1-2 h overlap. Patients who received the insulin early spent over 18 h longer on the infusion ( p < 0.01 ). Conclusions. A titratable insulin infusion added to the institutional DKA order set was associated with fewer days in the hospital and a significant reduction in hypoglycemic events. Furthermore, overlapping the long-acting insulin earlier with the insulin infusion early showed no benefit and could potentially be worse than the standard overlap.

505 Relationship of infusion duration and dose to safety, efficacy and pharmacodynamics: second part of a phase 1–2 study using VSV-IFNβ-NIS (VV1) oncolytic virus in patients with refractory solid tumors

BackgroundOncolytic viruses (OVs) show significant potential for treating tumors alongside immunotherapies.1 VV1 is an OV derived from the innocuous vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). VV1 has been engineered to expresses human interferon (IFN) β and thyroidal sodium iodide symporter (NIS).2 VV1-infected cells produce IFNβ, which protects non-cancer cells from VV1 and allows VV1 to spread more efficiently in cancerous tissue.3 4 NIS expression on cells imports 99mTc pertechnetate, which facilitates in vivo imaging of virus infection.2 This three-part, phase 1–2 study was designed to determine the safety and tolerability of VV1 in patients with advanced unresectable and metastatic solid tumors. Here we report on the second part of this study: selection of recommended phase 2 regimen (RP2D), comprising further assessment of both duration and dose.MethodsPatients (n=29) were enrolled to receive a single IV infusion of VVI monotherapy. 23 patients received IV VV1 1.7 x1010 TCID50 over 15, 30, 60 or 180 min. Six patients received 1.0 x1011 TCID50 over 30 min with aggressive premedication and fluid support overnight. Patients were monitored for dose limiting toxicities over 21 days with efficacy assessments after 6 weeks and then every 3 months for survival. The primary objective was to establish the safety and tolerability of IV VV1. Secondary objectives included preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.ResultsIn this study VV1, demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. No deaths or Grade 4 infusion-related reactions (IRR) were reported. VV1 shedding by buccal swabs was negative at all study visits. Peak IFNβ serum levels and preliminary efficacy signals (2 PRs) were associated with 30 min infusion duration and higher dose, with RECIST data pending for 1 x 1011(table 1).Abstract 505 Table 1ConclusionsIn this study, the absence of viral shedding demonstrates that VV1 is safe for patient and caregiver with little/no environmental impact. There was no difference in safety between the lower and the higher dose infusions. In this patient population acceptable tolerability was observed at the higher dose with 30 min duration, thus the RP2D is 1x 1011 over 30 mins.Trial RegistrationNCT02923466ReferencesHemminki O, Dos Santos JM, Hemminki A. Oncolytic viruses for cancer immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol 2020;13(1):84.Naik S, Nace R, Federspiel MJ, Barber GN, Peng KW, Russell SJ. Curative one-shot systemic virotherapy in murine myeloma. Leukemia 2012;26(8):1870–1878.Barber GN. Vesicular stomatitis virus as an oncolytic vector. Viral Immunol 2004;17(4):516–527.Lichty BD, Power AT, Stojdl DF, Bell JC. Vesicular stomatitis virus: re-inventing the bullet. Trends Mol Med 2004;10(5):210–216.Ethics ApprovalEthics approval was granted by WCG IRB. IRB tracking number: 20163005. Voluntary written informed consent was obtained from every patient prior to participation.

A first-in-human study of AO-176, a highly differentiated anti-CD47 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2516 Background: AO-176 is a humanized IgG2 antibody that specifically targets CD47. Expressed by multiple tumor types, CD47 binds to signal regulatory protein a (SIRPa) on phagocytes, including macrophages and dendritic cells. The CD47-SIRPa complex results in a “don’t eat me” signal that allows the tumor to escape removal by the innate immune system, disabling the generation of an adaptive immune response. The differentiated mechanisms of action of AO-176 include promotion of phagocytosis, direct tumor cell killing through programmed cell death type III and induction of damage associated molecular patterns/immunogenic cell death, preferentially binding to tumor cells vs. normal cells, and enhanced binding at an acidic pH as found in tumor microenvironments. AO-176 has negligible binding to RBCs. Methods: In a phase 1/2 first-in-human study (NCT03834948) of AO-176, pts with advanced solid tumors associated with high CD47 expression and an ECOG PS of 0-1 were enrolled into escalating dose cohorts of AO-176 given IV every 7 days. Objectives included evaluation of safety, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), antitumor activity, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and exploratory biomarkers. Results: As of 4 Jan 2021, 27 pts were enrolled (median age 64 years; 67% female; 67% ECOG PS 1; median [range] of 4 [1-7] prior therapies for metastatic disease). Dose levels of 1, 3, 10, 20 and 20 (using step-up dosing) mg/kg were evaluated in >250 infusions. Most common (>10%) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade were thrombocytopenia and infusion-related reaction (IRR) (33% each), anemia (22%) with no evidence of hemolysis, nausea (19%), and fatigue (15%). The only G3+ TRAE occurring in >10% of pts was asymptomatic, brief thrombocytopenia (22%). No platelet transfusions were given. DLTs included IRRs in 2 pts dosed at 20 mg/kg, and asymptomatic thrombocytopenia and a cerebrovascular accident in 1 pt each in the 20 mg/kg step-up cohort. The RP2D was 10 mg/kg. Implementation of additional pre-medication and a 6-hr infusion duration in cycle 1 eliminated subsequent IRRs. Dexamethasone tapering and shortening of the infusion duration to 2 hrs was successful in all pts after cycle 1. Interim PK analysis of AO-176 demonstrated consistent exposure with linear PK. The T1/2 was ̃5 days. One pt with endometrial carcinoma who had not responded to any of 4 prior systemic regimens had a confirmed PR and remains on study for >1 year. 7 pts had SD as a best response, with 2 pts (endometrial carcinoma, gastric cancer) on study for >6 mos. Conclusions: AO-176 is a well-tolerated, differentiated anti-CD47 therapeutic. Durable anti-tumor activity was observed. Evaluations of AO-176 in combination with paclitaxel in pts with select solid tumors (NCT03834948) and as a single-agent in pts with multiple myeloma (NCT04445701) are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03834948.

Risk Factors and Clinical Analysis for PICC Related Fungal Colonization in Premature Infants

Objective: The present study aimed to analyze the risk factors for positive peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) related fungal colonization in preterm infants. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in southwest China between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. The enrolled infants who underwent ultrasound-guided PICC insertion during hospitalization were born at < 32 weeks gestation or birth weight < 1500 grams. The demographics, the PICC related characteristics, the use of antibiotic, glucocorticoid and parenteral nutrition (PN) were collected from the medical record. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate risk factors for PICC-related fungal colonization. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off value by calculating the Yoden index. Results: A total of 124 premature infants underwent ultrasound-guided PICC insertion. Among them, 19 patients had positive results of fungi at PICC tips.PN infusion duration (OR 1.37, 95%CI 1.05-1.79) and postnatal glucocorticoid exposure(OR 9.19, 95%CI 1.04-81.65) were independent risk factors for fungal colonization in PICC. The optimal cut-off value was 15days,28days, respectively. Conclusion: PICC tips fungal colonization is affected by postnatal glucocorticoid exposure and PN infusion duration. Appropriate clinical management should be adopted to avoid fungal colonization and fungemia.

Successful rechallenge after etoposide infusion related adverse drug reactions

Etoposide is an antineoplastic agent widely used for treatment of many pediatric cancers and associated with infusion related adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In this brief report we describe etoposide infusion related ADRs that occurred over a 10-year period at two freestanding pediatric hospitals. Infusion reactions occurred in 1% of patients. Of the 32 patients that experienced adverse reactions, 41% were rechallenged after the reaction and all were able to tolerate at least one future dose with either pre-treatment or extending infusion duration.

Evaluating clinical impact of a shortened infusion duration for ramucirumab: a model-based approach

Purpose We investigated the impact of infusion duration (30 and 60 min) on the pharmacokinetic profile of ramucirumab using a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling approach. We also assessed the relationship between infusion rate and incidence of immediate infusion-related reactions (IRRs; occurring on the day of administration) using ramucirumab phase II/III study data. Methods The impact of different infusion durations (30 vs. 60 min) on the time-course of ramucirumab concentration profiles were evaluated using a PopPK model, established using ramucirumab pharmacokinetic data from 2522 patients. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between ramucirumab infusion rate and incidence of immediate IRRs in clinical trials. Results Ramucirumab time-course concentration profiles were equivalent following a 30- or 60-min infusion. In the pooled clinical study dataset, 254 of 3216 (7.9%) patients receiving ramucirumab experienced at least one immediate IRR (any grade). When grouped according to infusion rate quartile, the incidence of immediate IRRs (any grade or grade ≥ 3) was similar across quartiles; findings were confirmed in sensitivity analyses. The risk of immediate IRRs was not found to be associated with infusion rate based on multivariate logistic analysis. Conclusion Shortening the infusion duration of ramucirumab from 60 to 30 min has no impact on ramucirumab exposure. Analysis of trial data found no relationship between an increased risk of immediate IRRs and a faster infusion rate. Such a change in infusion duration is unlikely to affect the clinical efficacy or overall safety profile of ramucirumab.

Evaluating the clinical impact of a shortened infusion duration for ramucirumab: A population pharmacokinetic model-based approach.

191 Background: Ramucirumab is a human recombinant immunoglobin G1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) antagonist of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. Ramucirumab dosed at 8 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, was initially studied with as an intravenous infusion over 60 minutes following premedication with a histamine-1 receptor antagonist. Lengthy intravenous infusions are inconvenient for patients and increase the workloads of nursing and administrative staff. Shortening the infusion duration of ramucirumab could therefore benefit both patients and healthcare professionals. The current analysis determined the impact such a change could have on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of ramucirumab. Additionally, the relationship between infusion rate and incidence of immediate infusion-related reactions (IRRs; occurring on the day of administration), common adverse events associated with mAb infusions, was assessed. Methods: A population pharmacokinetic model was established using concentration–time data collected from 2522 patients who received one of five different ramucirumab regimens involving an intravenous infusion over ~60 minutes in 17 clinical studies. The final PK model was used to simulate concentration–time profiles and exposure parameters following ramucirumab infusion durations of 30 vs 60 min. Phase II/III clinical study data from patients receiving ramucirumab were pooled to assess the association between ramucirumab infusion rate and incidence of immediate IRRs using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Ramucirumab infusions of 30- and 60-min durations resulted in equivalent concentration–time profiles and, hence, equivalent systemic exposure to ramucirumab. Among 3216 patients receiving ramucirumab in phase II/III studies, 254 (7.9%) had at least one immediate any-grade IRR; 17 (0.5%) experienced grade ≥3 immediate IRRs. The incidence of immediate IRRs (any grade or grade ≥3) was similar across infusion rate quartiles. Under multivariate logistic analysis, infusion rate was not significantly associated with an increased risk of an immediate IRR (odds ratio per 1 mg/min increase 1.014, 95% confidence interval 0.999, 1.030; p=0.071). Conclusions: Administering ramucirumab using different infusion durations (30 vs 60 min) did not affect ramucirumab exposure. Analysis of clinical study data showed a faster infusion rate was not associated with an increased risk of immediate IRRs. It is considered unlikely that shortening the infusion duration of ramucirumab will impact its clinical efficacy or overall safety profile, and is now an option for administration in the U.S.