Efficacy of Lenalidomide in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated by Melphalan-Prednisone and Thalidomide

Abstract Abstract 4075 Introduction. The association of Melphalan-Prednisone and Thalidomide (MPT) is approved as first-line treatment in elderly patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM). This treatment demonstrated significant benefit in terms of overall survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) as opposed to MP alone. Lenalidomide (Len), used in combination with Dexamethasone (Len/Dex), is recommended to treat patients with relapsed MM who received a prior therapy. Len is an oral immunomodulator similar to Thalidomide (T). Both these drugs have identical activity but their safety profiles are different. So, in case of successive use of MPT and Len/Dex, it is legitimate to think that the efficacy of Len is affected by the previous use of T, probably because of the resistance to Len developed by relapsed or refractory patients. Therefore, we carried out a retrospective, multicentric study in order to assess the efficacy and safety of Len in patients with relapsed MM previously treated by MPT. Method. Our survey included 64 elderly patients with symptomatic MM from three French hematology centers. All the patients showed a relapsed MM treated with first-line treatment of MPT. Len was administered at first or second relapse. The main objective was to assess the efficacy of Len in terms of response rate, OS and PFS. Another objective was to evaluate the tolerance to Len and MPT treatments and to identify the predictive factors of efficacy of Len like the response rate, the duration of remission after MPT treatment and the line number of treatment before using Len. Results. The median age of patients at diagnosis was 73.5 years old and the sex ratio was 1. The M-protein was IgG for 64% of patients, IgA for 20%, light chains for 14% and IgD for 2%. Concerning the International Staging System, 35% of patients were stage I, 28% were stage II and 37% were stage III. MPT was administered with a 100mg/d thalidomide dose to 83% of patients. The median duration of T treatment was 13 months [range: 0.1 – 29.5]. The overall response rate (ORR) was 90% with 53% of partial response (PR), 27.5% of very good partial response (VGPR) and 9.5% of complete response (CR). Five patients stopped T because of progression on therapy, 36 because of toxicity out of which 26 because of peripheral neuropathy and 2 thromboembolic events. The median response duration after MPT was 25.5 months. Len was administered at first relapse to 47 patients (73.5%) and at second relapse for the others (n=17). The second-line treatment for these 17 patients was bortezomib-based regimen treatment. The daily dose of Len was 15 to 25 mg, always associated with low dose of Dex, for 83% of patients. Ten cycles of Len/Dex were administered on average. For 23/64 patients, the Len/Dex treatment is going on, 21/41 patients stopped because of progression and 17/41 because of toxicity (hematologic toxicity: 8/17, thromboembolic events: 2/17, general and gastrointestinal disorder: 7/17). The Len ORR was 78% (CR: 3.5%, VGPR: 27.5%, PR: 47%). The median SSP after initiation of Len is 12.8 months. The median OS after initiation of Len is 43 months and the OS rate is 58% at 3 years. Since the diagnosis, No predictive factor has a significant impact on the efficacy of Len. No second primary malignancies were reported. Conclusion. Our study shows that the efficacy and safety of Len is satisfactory, even after a Thalidomide treatment. The ORR and median PFS are similar to published data. There is no increase of toxicity for patients on Len, especially concerning thromboembolic events. With the development of new drugs like Carfilzomib, Pomalidomide and Eculizumab, the perspective of treatment increased as well as the number of lines. The choice of therapeutic sequences must be taken into account. In this study, we show that the MPT – Len/Dex sequence is effective and safe for elderly MM patients. Disclosures: Roussel: celgene: Honoraria; janssen: Honoraria. Attal:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leleu:celgene: Honoraria; janssen: Honoraria. Facon:onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hulin:celgene: Honoraria; janssen: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Physicians' Behavior, Diagnostics and Treatment Patterns in Multiple Myeloma Management in Belarus: Nation-Wide Survey

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111127 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5853-5853

Author(s):

Ihar Iskrou ◽

Anatoly Uss ◽

Sergey Golubev ◽

Vitali Papok

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Background: Although multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease, its management progressed during the last decade owing to novelties in diagnostics and new therapeutic options. There is a general belief in heterogeneity of the novel technologies penetration among countries and regions, such differences should be studied. Information on physicians' knowledge, preferences and satisfaction is limited worldwide and may provide important insights for explanation of differences in clinical decision making in routine practice. Moreover, data on typical diagnostic and treatment patterns in real-world clinical setting are particular scarce in the Eastern European and Eurasian region. Methods: A cross-sectional national survey of physicians treating MM in Belarus was performed from October 2017 till January 2018. Among 51 hematologists registered in the country 43 physicians involved in MM management in real clinical settings were approached. Printed forms of 21-item questionnaire containing multiple choice questions were used. We anonymously collected physicians' opinions on typical diagnostics and treatment patterns as well as their clinical reasoning, preferences and satisfaction. We assessed whether practice place and type, practical experience (length of service and average number of MM patients seen per year) and attitude to participation in clinical trials influence answers. Univariate analysis was conducted with Fisher's exact test. Results: All approached physicians completed the survey. Among respondents 17 (40%) belonged to republican specialized centers, 37 (86%) were hospital-based physicians, 23 (53%) had more than 10 years of service, 28 (65%) seen more than 20 MM patients per year. 10 (23%) declared their experience in clinical trials and 20 (46%) had no experience but expressed readiness to be involved in. The clinical uptake of revised ISS for MM was 33%, among adopters physicians with more than 10 years in practice and who sees more than 20 patients per year dominated. The proportions of ISS users which believed that median survival for low-risk, standard-risk and high-risk MM patients to be > 12 months were 100%, 100% and 36%, respectively. For primary MM diagnosis 40% of respondents used MRI and 49% - CT-imaging. Physicians used the next criteria for treatment response : < 5% plasma cells (PCs) in bone marrow (88%), Ig level normalization (74%), absence of clonal PCs in BM (60%), and absence of new lesions (37%). The possibility to perform autologous stem-cells transplantation (ASCT) was revealed as a key factor for first-line treatment choice. Various bortezomib-based regimens were predominant treatment options for first-line treatment of patients eligible for ASCT. Melphalan-containing regimens were more widely spread as first-line treatment of ASCT-ineligible patients. The majority of respondents (52%) practiced first-line treatment of more than 4 months of duration, while 41% of clinicians used second-line therapy of short duration (less than 6 months). In the relapse setting after ASCT the most common regimens were still bortezomib-based as well as schemes with bendamustine. In the second-line setting in patients who did not receive ASCT monotherapy was more commonly reported. In absence of high dose dexamethasone for oral use Belarusian physicians preferred treatment schemes with combination of drugs for IV and per os routes of administration. The predominant factors of drug choice were efficacy (91%) and cost (97%). The respondents reported satisfaction with current situation in diagnostics and treatment in 74% and 65% of cases, respectively. The factors influencing readiness for disease management change were clinical experience, hospital-based practice position and positive attitude to/participation in clinical trials. Conclusions: The study covers the gaps of information about real-world MM management in Belarus. The Belarusian physicians are aware about the modern place of ASCT in MM. Targeted education in specific aspects of MM management (disease biology understanding, clinical guidelines updates, risk evaluation and stratification) may result in wider adoption of innovative diagnostic approaches and treatment technologies. MM management should be further concentrated in large specialized clinical centers for plasma cells disorders. The survey results make possible and warranted further intercountry comparisons. Disclosures Iskrou: Takeda Belarus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Belarus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Belarus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Nativita Belarus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma Belarus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Uss:Roche Belarus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Belarus: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Golubev:Medical department of Takeda Belarus: Employment. Papok:Medical department of Takeda Belarus: Employment.

Download Full-text

Clinical and Biological Characteristics and Outcomes of Richter Transformation : A French Multicenter Study from the Filo Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128053 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4112-4112

Author(s):

Charline Moulin ◽

Romain Morizot ◽

Thomas Remen ◽

Hélène Augé ◽

Florian Bouclet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Long Term Survivors ◽

First Line Treatment

Introduction: About 2 to 10% of patients (pts) diagnosed with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, so-called Richter transformation (RT)) over long-term follow-up. The outcomes of pts with RT are variable and poorly understood and there is no consensus on the best therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, outcomes and factors predictive of survival in a large series of RT from the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO). Methods: Biopsy-confirmed RT (limited to DLBCL and excluding Hodgkin lymphoma) diagnosed from 2001 to 2018 were identified from eight FILO centers. Clinical and biological characteristics of CLL and RT at diagnosis, including cytogenetics, clonal relation with the pre-existing CLL, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status, cell of origin (COO) analyzed by immunohistochemistry and RT score (Tsimberidou AM et al, J Clin Oncol, 2006) were analyzed as well as treatment and outcomes. Overall survivals (OS) were defined as time from CLL and RT diagnosis to death from any cause and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4. Results: A total of 70 CLL pts who developed RT were identified. The median age at CLL diagnosis was 62 years old (range 35-82), and 50 (71.4 %) were male. The median time to transformation was 5.5 years (range 0 to 22 years), with 12 simultaneous diagnosis of CLL and RT. Prior to RT, 20 (29%) pts had not been treated for CLL, 50 received one (n=21) or more (n= 29) line of treatment ; 6 pts had received a novel agent (ibrutinib, idelalisib or venetoclax). The median age at RT diagnosis was 68 years old (range 42-88). All biopsies were centrally reviewed; 38/58 pts (66%) had elevated LDH (>1.5N) ; 35/65 pts (54 %) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm); 10/54 (18.5%) pts had del(17p) or TP53 mutation ; 9/42 pts (21%) had a complex karyotype (at least 3 abnormalities). The CLL and RT were clonally related in 27/27 (100%) tested pts. COO by Hans algorithm was non germinal center B cell-like (GCB) in 26/28 pts (93%). EBV was positive or detected in 5/40 (12.5%) pts. The median of Ki67 positivity was 70% (range 30% to 100%). The RT score (based at RT diagnosis on ECOG performance status 2-4, LDH >1.5 x normal, platelets<100 x 109/L, tumor size >5 cm and >1 prior therapy for CLL) was : low risk in 17 pts (31%), low-intermediate risk in 10 pts (19%), high-intermediate risk in 14 pts (25%) and high risk in 14 pts (25%). The most common first-line treatment of RT was immunochemotherapy (n=57, 87%) including R-CHOP-like regimen (n=48, 73%). Autologous or allogeneic transplantation was performed for 7 pts (11%). Response to first-line treatment was complete or partial response in 26 pts (40%), and stable disease or progression in 39 pts (60%). After a median follow-up of 8 years, 51/64 pts (80%) have died. The main causes of death were progressive DLBCL (n=36, 71%), infection (n=8, 16%) or progressive CLL (n=2, 4%). The median OS of the cohort from CLL and RT diagnosis (Figure 1) were 7.8 years and 9.5 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with TP53 disruption at CLL stage, low platelets count, elevated LDH, elevated beta2-microglobulin, high ECOG score, high RT score, EBV positivity and absence of response to first-line RT treatment had worse OS. The ECOG score, platelets count and TP53 disruption remain significant in multivariate Cox-regression. Last, we compared the clinical and biological parameters of two Richter groups defined as: (i) short-term survivors (<12 months, n = 34) and (ii) long-term survivors (>48 months, n = 18). Long survival was significantly associated with elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to RT first-line treatment. Discussion: The clinical outcomes of RT patients is poor and novel treatment options are needed. However, a group of long-term survivors was identified, characterized by elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to immunochemotherapy. Disclosures Leblond: Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Thieblemont:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Kyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cymbalista:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Guièze:Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Broseus:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Feugier:gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Major Improvement of Invasive Aspergillosis Outcome Is Not Enough to Improve Overall Survival In Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Results From a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1244.1244 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1244-1244

Author(s):

Géraldine Salmeron ◽

Raphaël Porcher ◽

Anne Bergeron ◽

Marie Robin ◽

Regis Peffault de Latour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 1244 Background. Voriconazole (V) treatment has been shown to improve the 12 week (W) survival rate of hematological patients (pts) with invasive aspergillosis (IA), including recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). We investigated whether this early survival advantage could translate into a significant increase in overall survival. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive pts who received a transplant between Sept. 1997 and Dec. 2008 at Saint-Louis Hospital and were diagnosed as having IA. The temporal origin of the study was the date of IA diagnosis for each patient. Factors associated with survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models. Separate models were estimated for survival up to 12 W and for survival between 12 W and 24 months (M) in pts surviving longer than 12 W. The deaths of pts with and without IA were analyzed with a competing risk framework. Cumulative incidence curves were compared using Gray's tests. Results. Our study examined 89 IA pts. The median follow-up was 70 M (range, 11–130 M). Two pts did not receive any antifungal treatment and were excluded from subsequent analyses. Of the 87 pts, 42 received first-line V and 45 primarily received a lipid formulation of amphotericin B (n=25), amphotericin B deoxycholate (n=10), caspofungin (n=8) or itraconazole (n=2). The primary characteristics of pts with IA and their causes of death, separated by V as first-line treatment, are shown in the table below. The median survival was 2.6 M, and the overall survival at 24 M was 19% (95% CI 12–30 M) (see figure). Overall, the survival rates of the two groups were significantly different (P= 0.010). However, the differences in survival were quite dramatic prior to 10 M, whereas both survival curves became very close after one year. At 18 M, the numbers of surviving pts were almost identical in the two groups [19% (95% CI: 11–34%) in pts who did not receive V as first-line treatment vs. 21% (95% CI 11–38%) in pts who did]. Pts who did not receive V as a first-line treatment displayed a higher probability of dying from IA than those who did (P=0.004), whereas opposite results were found for mortality in pts without IA (P=0.006). The 24-M cumulative incidence of death from IA was 47% (95% CI 31–61%) in the no V group and 19% (95% CI 9–33%) in the group treated with V. The 24-M cumulative incidence of death in pts without IA was 4% (95% CI 7–14%) in the no V group and 27% (95% CI 14–42%) in pts treated with V. The probability of death from another cause, with IA, was similar in both groups (29% vs. 36% at 24 M; P=0.46). After adjusting for donor type, conditioning regimen, progressive GVHD at diagnosis of IA and cumulated steroid dose (mg/kg) in the W preceding IA diagnosis, administration of V as first-line treatment was found to decrease the risk of death during the first 12 W by approximately 70% [HR=0.31 (95% CI 0.16–0.60); P=0.0005]. Conversely, analysis of mortality between 12 W and 24 M failed to identify any significant predictor of risk of death; however, only 24 pts died during this period. Conclusions. The finding that first-line treatment with V, which is associated with a tremendous improvement in IA outcome, does not translate into an increase in overall survival (even in the context of early diagnosis) is striking. Diagnosis of IA following HSCT, whatever the outcome, appears to be a strong marker for poor long-term prognosis. Disclosures: Bergeron: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau, none; Merck: Speakers Bureau, none; Schering: Speakers Bureau, none. Sulahian:Pfizer: Research Funding, non; Merck: Research Funding, none. Ribaud:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, none; Schering: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, none; Gilead: Speakers Bureau, none.

Download Full-text

A Phase III Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in Combination with Melphalan and Prednisone (MPR) in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.613.613 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 613-613 ◽

Cited By ~ 17

Author(s):

Antonio Palumbo ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Michel Delforge ◽

Martin Kropff ◽

Robin Foa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Interim Analysis ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Time To Progression ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 613 Background: Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) is an oral immunomodulatory agent with clinical efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In patients with relapsed/refractory MM, lenalidomide plus dexamethasone improved time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) in comparison with dexamethasone alone. In newly diagnosed MM patients, the current study compares the efficacy and safety of melphalan, prednisone and lenalidomide (MPR) with that of MP alone. Methods: Key inclusion criteria were: ≥65 years of age, newly diagnosed and symptomatic MM. 459 patients were randomly assigned to receive MPR followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy or MPR followed by placebo maintenance therapy or MP followed by placebo maintenance therapy (Figure 1). The study induction and maintenance phases were followed by an open label lenalidomide extension and a follow-up phase. All patients received aspirin 100 mg/day as thrombo-prophylaxis. The primary endpoint of the study is progression free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints are OS, time-to-progression, response rate, time to response, response duration, time-to-next anti-myeloma therapy, safety, quality of life and exploratory assessment of cytogenetic abnormalities. Primary comparison is based on the intent-to-treat population comparing PFS between MPR followed by lenalidomide with MP followed by placebo; secondary comparisons are between MPR followed by lenalidomide and MPR followed by placebo, and between MPR followed by placebo and MP followed by placebo. Results: The first patient was enrolled in February 2007. A pre-planned interim analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety was performed at 50% information. An independent central adjudication committee determined the assessment and timing of progressive disease prior to the interim analysis. At the interim analysis, it was determined by the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) that the study had crossed the O'Brien Fleming superiority boundary for the primary endpoint, demonstrating a highly statistically significant improvement in PFS for patients treated with MPR compared with MP as first-line treatment for MM patients. The topline results will be availabel at the time of the meeting. Conclusions: MPR is an effective and safe regimen for front-line use in MM. PFS was significantly improved in patients who received MPR followed by lenalidomide maintenance compared with those who received MP followed by placebo maintenance. MPR followed by lenalidomide maintenance is a new therapeutic option and can be considered a new standard for patients older than 65 years old. Disclosures: Palumbo: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide is not approved for first line use in multiple myeloma. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Honoraria. Delforge:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kropff:Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Foa:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yu:Celgene: Employment. Herbein:Celgene: Employment. Mei:Celgene: Employment. Jacques:Celgene: Employment. Catalano:Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Clinicopathological Features of Nodular Sclerosis-Type Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma In the Elderly: Multicenter Study of Hodgkin Lymphoma In Japan

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2677.2677 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2677-2677

Author(s):

Naoko Asano ◽

Tomohiro Kinoshita ◽

Koichi Ohshima ◽

Tadashi Yoshino ◽

Nozomi Niitsu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Research Funding ◽

The Elderly ◽

Clinicopathological Features ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 2677 Background: Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL), which is characterized by the presence of Hodgkin and Reed Sternberg (H-RS) cells in a background of non-neoplastic inflammatory cells, is divided into four histological subgroups, nodular sclerosis (NSCHL), mixed cellularity (MCCHL), lymphocyte-rich, and lymphocyte depletion. While NSCHL in young adults is characterized by a mediastinal mass and good prognosis, the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCHL in the elderly (NSCHL-e) remain uncertain. Patients and methods: Enrolled patients were diagnosed with CHL between 1986 and 2006 as part of the Hodgkin Lymphoma's Multicenter Study Group. To better characterize NSCHL-e, we compared the clinicopathological profiles of 84 NSCHL-e patients aged 50 or over with 237 NSCHL-y patients aged 49 or younger and 302 with MCCHL. Results: The total of 743 CHL patients consisted of 496 men and 247 women with a median age of 48 years (range, 15– 89 years). The pathological diagnoses were NSCHL in 324 patients (43%) and MCCHL in 303 (41%). NSCHL patients showed a bimodal age distribution, with an initial peak in their 20s and a second small peak in their 60s. We categorized the former as NSCHL-y (49 or younger) and the latter as NSCHL-e (50 and over). NSCHL-e patients were characterized by male predominance and a more advanced clinical stage (53%) than NSCHL-y. Immunophenotypically, H-RS cells had the prototypic immunophenotype of CD15+ CD30+ and Pax5+. NSCHL-e cases showed a significantly higher rate of CD20 (24%) than NSCHL-y (8%, P = 0.001). Furthermore, H-RS cells in 29 of 75 (39%) patients with NSCHL-e were positive for EBV RNA transcripts by in situ hybridization, whereas only 7% of NSCHL-y cases were EBER-positive (P < 0.0001) (Table). Regarding NSCHL-e and MCCHL, no significant difference between these patients was seen in clinical characteristics. Immunophenotypically, NSCHL-e patients showed significantly higher rates for CD3 and TIA-1, while MCCHL patients showed higher EBV positivity (75%). Fifty-five of 63 patients received systemic multi-agent chemotherapy as first-line treatment, consisting of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbacin (ABVD) in 38 patients; CHOP in 8; C-MOPP in 8; and BEACOPP in 1. Overall, 51 patients responded to first-line treatment, 39 with complete response and 12 with partial response. Disease-specific survival of NSCHL-e was poorer than that of NSCHL-y (P < 0.001) but similar to that of MCCHL (P = 0.43) (Figure). Conclusion: NSCHL-e is characterized by an unfavorable prognosis and different clinicopathological features to NSCHL-y, which is considered as typical NSCHL. A number of cases of NSCHL-e might have been associated with MCCHL, with most being EBV-positive. These results suggest the limitations of current histological subgroupings for CHL. Disclosures: Matsushita: Pfizer CO.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxter Co.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

VTD (Bortezomib Plus Thalidomide Plus Dexamethasone) Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation As First Line Treatment for Multiple Myeloma: Real Life Results from a Single Institution

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.5380.5380 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 5380-5380

Author(s):

Salvatore Palmieri ◽

Angela Gravetti ◽

Stefano Rocco ◽

Antonella Carbone ◽

Carolina Copia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Salvage Therapy ◽

Partial Remission ◽

Response Rate ◽

Real Life ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract BACKGROUND. In recent years, new classes of drugs have been introduced for the treatment of Multiple myeloma (MM). Several randomized trials have investigated, in the setting of first line treatment of patients eligible for autologous transplant (ASCT), the efficacy of the combination of two to four new and old drugs given as induction. Among these, VTD combination (bortezomib plus thalidomide plus dexamethasone) provided impressive results, so that it is now considered at different Institutions the standard of care as pretransplant therapy. However, data of VTD derive from clinical trials and should be verified in the "real life" setting, in terms of either efficacy or toxicity. AIMS. Here we present our experience in 76 MM patients treated between 2008 and 2014 with VTD as part of a first line treatment including also mobilization, single or double ASCT, and consolidation with two additional VD courses. No patient had been enrolled into a clinical trial. CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS/METHODS. There were 39 males and 37 females, with a median age of 57 years (range 38-67). MM subtype was IgG=44 cases, IgA=15, IgD=1, micromolecular=13, non secreting=2, and solitary plasmocytoma=1. Stage according to Durie & Salmon was II-A=29, II-B=2, III-A=34 and III-B=10. In 8 cases single or multiple vertebroplasty was also necessary, while 7 patients had concomitant extramedullary plasmocytoma. In absence of CRAB criteria, patients were treated when progressive increase of M-component was observed. Treatment was given according to GIMEMA-MM-BO2005 protocol (Cavo et al, Lancet 2010) except for the following: from September 2012, bortezomib was given subcutaneously (in a total of 37 patients) and 4 instead of 3 induction cycles were given; mobilization therapy consisted of vinorelbine 30mg/sqm day 1 plus cyclophosphamyde 1500 mg/sqm day 2 (for further details, Annunziata et al, Ann Hematol 2006); consolidation did not include thalidomide and was given only from 2011; no maintenance therapy with dexamethasone was administered. RESULTS. Overall response rate after induction was 92% (70/76 patients), with 35 complete remission (CR), 25 very good partial remission (VGPR), 9 partial remission (PR) and one minimal response (MR). One patient was considered as stable disease and continued with the therapeutic program, 3 patients were refractory and were switched to salvage therapy, and 2 patients died during induction (due to fatal sepsis from H1N1 virus infection and multiorgan failure in a severely ill subject, respectively). After successful mobilization in 70/71 patients, single (n=34) or double (n=36) ASCT were given, depending on quantity of CD34+ cell collection, toxicity of first ASCT and response achieved. High dose melphalan was the conditioning regimen in all cases. After ASCT, response was upgraded in 24 cases (in 17 cases VGPR to CR, 4 PR to VGPR, 2 PR to CR, 1 MR to PR). Consolidation was given in all 47 programmed cases. Hematologic toxicity of VTD was negligible. Reduction of thalidomide schedule was necessary in 60 patients, while only 16 patients (21%) were able to complete the programmed days of therapy at 200 mg/day. In the remaining cases, 39 completed the therapy at 100 mg, 2 at 50 mg, while 19 had to definitely discontinue therapy after a median of 33 days (15-68). More frequent reasons of discontinuation or reduction were neuropathy, constipation, fatigue and skin rash; only 1 case of thrombosis was recorded in a non responding patient. Reduction of bortezomib dose was necessary only in 5 patients (all ev cases), all because of neuropathy. At the time of writing 57/76 patients (75%) are alive, with a median follow up of 27 months. The median duration of response was 38 months, 25/70 patients (36%) having progressed or relapsed. Depending on time to relapse (> or < 18 months), bortezomib or lenalidomide based salvage therapy was used. Overall and progression free survival (OS and PFS) are shown in figure 1. DISCUSSION. Our data demonstrate that the VTD combination in the real life is an extremely effective regimen in terms of response rate. Most patients after VTD are able to mobilize CD34+ cells as well as to receive ASCT. In a considerable proportion of cases reduction of thalidomide dose is required and in 25% of cases the drug needed to be discontinued. As compared to data from clinical trials, PFS in our series seems to be shorter, however our patients were unselected and in this series follow up is significantly longer. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Predictors of Early Relapse Following Initial Therapy for Systemic Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2082.2082 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2082-2082

Author(s):

Nidhi Tandon ◽

Surbhi Sidana ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Early Relapse ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL Amyloidosis) is a monoclonal plasma cell proliferative disorder that is characterized by tissue deposits of misfolded insoluble κ or λ light chain derived amyloid fibrils, leading to organ dysfunction. The prognosis of patients depends on the number and severity of organ involvement, especially cardiac involvement. Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), if eligible, alkylator (melphalan) and novel drugs like proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulators (IMiD) have improved the overall survival (OS) during the past decades. But still, nearly half of the patients die within a year of diagnosis. We analyzed the factors predicting early relapse / progression or death (within 12 months) after first line therapy for systemic AL amyloidosis. Methods Clinical and laboratory data of all consecutive patients with systemic AL amyloidosis seen at Mayo Clinic within 90 days of their diagnosis, between 2006 and 2015, was collected by chart review and analyzed retrospectively. Patients who died within 3 months of starting the first line treatment were excluded from analysis. Early relapse (ER) was defined as relapse / progression requiring treatment change / re-institution or death within 12 months of starting first line treatment. Patients in the cohort with ER were compared with patients with a follow up of more than 12 months who had a relapse / progression beyond 12 months or had continuing response at the time of analysis. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi - square and Fisher's exact test and continuous variables using Kruskal- Wallis test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariate analysis was done using logistic regression model. Results Seven hundred and eighty six patients with newly diagnosed systemic AL amyloidosis met the study criteria and were included in the analysis. Among these, 230 (29.3%) patients had ER within 12 months of starting initial therapy while 556 (70.7%) patients either relapsed after 1 year or had continuing response at the time of analysis. Baseline demographics, organ involvement and type of first line therapy are presented in Table1. The median estimated follow up for the entire cohort from start of initial therapy was 62.9 months (95% CI; 59.9, 67.3). The variables included in the univariate and multivariate analyses for factors predicting ER were age at diagnosis (≤ vs > 70 years ), revised mayo stage (I and II vs III and IV), bone marrow plasma cell percentage (BMPC; ≤ 10% vs > 10%), presence of any chromosomal abnormalities, trisomies or IgH translocations by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multiorgan involvement [(>1 vs 1) (heart, liver, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, autonomic neuropathy), incorporation of ASCT in initial therapy. In univariate analysis, mayo stage (p<0.0001), multiorgan involvement (p=0.0008) and inclusion of ASCT as part of initial therapy (p<0.0001) were significantly associated with ER, while age (p=0.06), BMPC(p=0.9), FISH abnormalities (p=0.2) were not. However, in multivariate analysis, only mayo stage (III + IV vs I + II; p=0.01) and non-inclusion of ASCT in first line treatment (p=0.0001) were significantly predictive of ER. Conclusions Despite the introduction of ASCT and novel drugs, the early mortality in systemic AL amyloidosis remains high. This study demonstrates that patients with ER are older with higher prevalence of cardiac involvement and multiorgan involvement and higher Mayo stage (III and IV). Incorporation of ASCT as part of the initial therapy was associated with reduced early relapse, but it is difficult to separate the influence of the eligibility for ASCT from the effect of ASCT itself. This will help us in characterizing these patients to better understand their mechanisms of resistance to therapy and gives an insight to the type of initial therapy that benefits them. Disclosures Dispenzieri: GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; pfizer: Research Funding. Kapoor:Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kesios: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Management of Steroid-Refractory Graft-Versus-Host Disease - a Survey By the Transplant Complications Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152305 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2884-2884

Author(s):

Zinaida Peric ◽

Helene Schoemans ◽

Christophe Peczynski ◽

Christian Koenecke ◽

Ivan S. Moiseev ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Working Party ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Clinical Practices ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Prospective Trials ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: As there is limited evidence to guide management of patients with steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) there is a broad variability of clinical practices. To document the current practice and assess the impact of emerging new drugs in SR-GVHD, Transplant Complications Working Party (TCWP) of the EBMT performed a survey among EBMT centers that covered specific treatment decisions on first- and second-line treatment of acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD and cGVHD). Methods: The survey was conducted from December 2020 to March 2021 among EBMT centers. A questionnaire was developed by the study authors and used for data collection. It consisted of 40 questions focused on general approach in the first-line treatment, preferred second-line treatment in SR-GVHD and ancillary care in aGVHD and cGVHD. Results: 145 centers from 33 countries agreed to participate and responded to the questionnaire. First-line treatment of aGVHD was reported as rather homogenous; with most centers (68%) starting with lower doses of corticosteroids (CS) (<2mg/kg) in lower grade aGVHD (grade 2a) and most centers (88%) starting with higher doses (2mg/kg) in aGVHD grades >2b. On the other hand, the evaluation of response to CS was more heterogeneous: at 3 days in 33%, at 5 days in 30%, at 7 days in 15% of centers and depending on severity of aGVHD in most other centers. In the presence of SR-aGVHD, 50% of centers consider inclusion of patients in clinical trials. Although as much as 85% of centers reported to have a standard operating procedure (SOP) for SR-aGVHD management, only 45% (n=66) have an established one or 2-agent second-line treatment; most frequently ruxolitinib (n=46) and/or extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) (n=29). All other centers reported a very heterogeneous practice and listed multiple agents (range, 3-10) as second-line treatment options. In total, the most used agents for SR-aGVHD as shown in Figure 1A are ruxolitinib in 68%, ECP in 59%, mycophenolate-mofetil (MMF) in 27%, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in 25%, high-dose CS (>2mg/kg) in 15%, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in 14%, etanercept in 13%, infliximab in 11% and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in 10% of centers. Clinical practice in first-line treatment of cGVHD again appeared relatively homogeneous; 58% of centers reported to treat mild forms with topical treatment only, unless affected organs could not be reached topically. In moderate/severe cGVHD, the majority (71%) of centers start with 0.5-1mg/kg of CS, in 45% with addition of CNI, while others use higher doses of CS +/- other agents. The evaluation of response was done before 4 weeks in 41% of centers, between 5-8 weeks in 41%, while a minority performed later response assessment or based the latter on organ affection/severity. In case of SR-cGVHD, 56% of centers would consider the inclusion in clinical trials, while only 65% have a SOP on management of these patients. One third of centers (35%) has an established multidisciplinary cGVHD team. Practices for SR-cGVHD again varied significantly, with most centers reporting on the use of more than 2 agents (range, 3-13) as second-line and with most applied agents as depicted in Figure 1B; ruxolitinib and ECP in 68% of centers, CNI in 40%, MMF in 37%, rituximab in 27%, imatinib in 25%, mTOR inhibitors in 23%, ibrutinib and methotrexate (MTX) in 19%, pulse of CS in 17%, MSC in 12% and PUVA therapy in 10% of centers. Conclusions:In summary, this survey revealed a rather homogenous first-line management of aGVHD and cGVHD based on steroids in the majority of centers. However, when first-line fails, the definition of SR-GVHD remains highly variable and SR-GVHD is still treated with a seemingly "trial and error" approach as demonstrated by significant variability of clinical practices among EBMT centers for second-line treatment. However, in line with recently published prospective trials, ruxolitinib comes forth as one of the most used therapeutic modalities in both SR-aGVHD and cGVHD, together with already widely administered ECP. On the contrary, ibrutinib has not emerged as standard of care in this setting. Future efforts should be invested in finding a standardized approach in SR-GVHD by directly comparing most applied second-line agents in prospective trials as well as evidence-based personalized treatment approaches. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Peric: Therakos, Servier, MSD, Astellas, Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer: Honoraria. Schoemans: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: personal fees , Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants and personal fees; Gilead: Other: travel grants; CIBMTR: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BHS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants and personal fees , Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: personal fees; Takeda: Other: personal fees. Koenecke: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; EUSA Pharm: Consultancy. Basak: Saventic Health: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Greinix: Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Therakos: Consultancy. Penack: Omeros: Consultancy; Shionogi: Consultancy; Priothera: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Therakos: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia on Non-Intensive Therapy: Applicability of the European Leukemia Net Risk Classification

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153202 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3382-3382

Author(s):

Pablo Silva ◽

Jon Badiola ◽

Reyes María Martín-Rojas ◽

Ignacio Gómez-Centurión ◽

Gabriela Rodríguez-Macias ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Intensive Therapy ◽

Risk Groups ◽

Intensive Treatment ◽

Intensive Chemotherapy ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract BACKGROUND The revised genetic risk classification established by the European Leukemia Net (ELN) in 2017 stratifies patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) into 3 prognostic categories (favourable, intermediate, and adverse) based on cytogenetic and molecular characteristics.The ELN classification is widely accepted in AML patients despite the fact that validation studies were performed in participants who received exclusively first-line treatment with intensive chemotherapy. For this reason, it is not well established whether the ELN risk groups are applicable to patients on non-intensive first-line treatment. OBJECTIVES - To describe and compare baseline characteristics at diagnosis between patients with AML treated with intensive and non-intensive therapy. - To assess whether the ELN prognostic classification is applicable in these subgroups of patients. METHODS We retrospectively analysed patients with newly diagnosed AML admitted to our center between 2007 and 2020. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3), patients younger than 18 years old and/or patients who received exclusively supportive treatment were excluded. Demographic and clinical data, disease characteristics at diagnosis and first-line treatment were collected. Cytogenetic and molecular characteristics were used to classify patients in ELN risk groups. RESULTS Of the total of patients (n=218), one hundred and fifty-six (71.6%) received intensive chemotherapy treatment, while 62 (28.4%) were treated with non-intensive strategies. Idarubicin and cytarabine based schemes regimens (IA) were administered in most patients (98.6%) who received intensive treatment while the rest received fludarabine based regimens. One patient (0.6%) was treated with danurubicin and cytarabine liposome (CPX-351). Fifty-four (87%) patients treated with non-intensive regimens received hypomethylating agents, mostly azacitidine. Five patients (8%) were treated with venetoclax in combination with a hypomethylating agent. Table 1 shows the characteristics at diagnosis in both groups of patients. Patients who received intensive chemotherapy were younger and had higher leukocyte count, LDH values and a higher percentage of blasts in peripheral blood and bone marrow with a median of 40% and 62% blasts respectively. On the other hand, patients under non-intensive treatment more frequently presented a past history of hemopathy and a higher percentage of bone marrow dysplasia. Regarding ELN stratification significant differences were found between both groups. Patients who received aggressive chemotherapy vs patients who did not, were classified in low (28% vs. 7%), intermediate (36% vs. 58%) and high risk (36% vs. 35%) respectively (Figure 1). At the end of the follow-up, 41% of the patients who had received intensive therapy were alive while only 6.5% of the patients who had received non-intensive treatment were alive. Significant differences in survival were observed between both groups (p<0.01); with 1-year overall survival (OS) of 65.8% for intensive therapy group and 49.6% for non-intensive therapy group. In the intensive chemotherapy group, significant differences in survival were observed according to ELN risk stratification (p<0.01), with 5-year OS of 55%, 29% and 23.9% for low, intermediate and high-risk groups respectively. For low-risk patients, median OS was not reached while it was 20 months for the intermediate risk group and 12.2 months for the high-risk group. However, in patients receiving non-intensive therapies, there were no significant differences in survival among different prognostic categories (p=0.06). In this group, 1-year OS was 25%, 57.6% and 40.7% and median OS was 2.1, 14.8 and 10.1 months for low, intermediate and high-risk groups respectively. See Figure 2. CONCLUSIONS: As validated in previous trials, ELN classification constitutes an adequate prognostic marker for patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with intensive chemotherapy. In our series, this classification does not appear to be a good predictor of survival for patients diagnosed with AML who initiated non-intensive treatments. Further validation in prospective studies are needed to better classify this growing subgroup of patients in clinical practice. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Martín-Rojas: Celgene-BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Font Lopez: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GILEAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELGENE-BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kwon: Novartis, Celgene, Gilead, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Single-Agent Ibrutinib As First-Line Treatment for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) in Routine Clinical Practice in Spain

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136036 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 32-33

Author(s):

Pau Abrisqueta Costa ◽

Javier Loscertales ◽

Maria Jose Terol ◽

Angel Ramirez Payer ◽

Macarena Ortiz Pareja ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Single Agent ◽

Haematological Toxicity ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Treatment

Introduction. Ibrutinib is a first-in-class, oral, once-a-day Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor that achieves high overall response rates and durable remissions in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) including those with high-risk features (unmutated IGHV, TP53 abnormalities, 11q deletion). Survival with continuous single-agent ibrutinib in previously-untreated CLL patients is comparable to an age-matched general population (Figure 1). IBRORS is an observational, retrospective, multicentre study to describe the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with CLL treated with single-agent ibrutinib in routine clinical practice in Spain. This present analysis reviews the subset of patients in IBRORS who received ibrutinib as the first-line of treatment. This series includes a significant number of patients with high risk cytogenetic/molecular alterations (del17p/TP53 M), which corresponds with the approved indication for first-line CLL patients in Spain at the time. Methods. Adult patients diagnosed with CLL treated with single-agent ibrutinib in first-line, or at first or second relapse since its commercialization in Spain (between January 2016 to January 2019) were included in the IBRORS study. Clinical characteristics of patients, efficacy and tolerability of ibrutinib as first-line treatment were analyzed here. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results. 84 patients, from a total of 269 included in IBRORS, received single-agent ibrutinib as first-line treatment. The median age was 71.3 years (range 63-77) at the time of ibrutinib initiation. 56.3% of patients presented with an intermediate/high-risk Rai-Binet stage, and the majority of patients (98.6%) had an ECOG PS of 0-1. 91.7% of patients had at least 1 high risk molecular cytogenetic factor (unmutated IGHV, TP53 abnormalities, 11q deletion or complex karyotype) described in table 1. Baseline comorbidities of patients are described in table 2. Concomitant medication included anticoagulants (9.5% patients; vitamin K antagonist [n=4], Apixaban [n=1] and LMWH [n=3] patients), antiplatelet agents (11.9% patients), and antihypertensives (50% patients). The overall response rate (ORR) was 79.5%; 14/84 (16.6%) achieved a complete response (CR), 14/84 (16.6%) achieved CR unconfirmed, 27/84 (32.14%) achieved a partial response (PR) and 12/84 (14.2%) a PR + lymphocytosis. The median PFS and OS were not reached, and the estimated PFS at 24 months was 84.5% (73.4-95.6%). OS and PFS curves are represented in figure 2. The PFS of each patient subgroup with high-risk cytogenetic characteristics was similar to that of all patients in the first-line cohort: del17p/TP53 mutation (HR = 0.963 [95% CI 0.188-4.928]; p = 0.964), del11q (HR = 0.042 [95% CI 0.000-682.736]; p=0.521), unmutated IGHV (HR = 0.391 [95% CI 0.110-1.394]; p = 0.148). The median duration of exposure to ibrutinib was 17.3 (11.9-25.6) months. Dose reduction of ibrutinib occurred in 17/84 (20.2%) patients, 8/84 (9.52%) due to toxicity (4 hematologic toxicity and 4 non-hematologic toxicity). 27/84 (32.1%) patients had temporary interruption of treatment. 15/84 (17.8%) patients permanently discontinued ibrutinib including 6 (7.14%) patients due to progression, 4 (4.76%) due to toxicity and 5 for other reasons. Safety: 49/84 (58.3%) patients developed at least one adverse event (AE), while 12/84 (14.2%) patients developed at least one serious adverse event (SAE). Twelve (14.3%) patients reported at least one haematological toxicity while 53 patients (63.1%) recorded at least one non-haematological toxicity. Only 1 patient experienced grade 3 atrial fibrillation, which did not lead to discontinuation. The most common AEs are described in table 3. Conclusion. This population of previously-untreated CLL patients, enriched for high-risk genomic features, reflects the initial approval of ibrutinib for the treatment of first-line patients with del17p in Spain. Single-agent Ibrutinib as the first-line treatment in this real world population was effective regardless of risk factors and well tolerated, with a low rate of discontinuation due to toxicity. Findings are consistent with those reported in clinical trials. Disclosures Loscertales: AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria. Arguiñano:AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Hernandez-Rivas:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rovi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pérez Persona:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jannsen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy. Loriente:Janssen Cilag: Current Employment. Villanueva:Janssen Cilag: Current Employment.

Download Full-text