Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia on Non-Intensive Therapy: Applicability of the European Leukemia Net Risk Classification

Abstract BACKGROUND The revised genetic risk classification established by the European Leukemia Net (ELN) in 2017 stratifies patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) into 3 prognostic categories (favourable, intermediate, and adverse) based on cytogenetic and molecular characteristics.The ELN classification is widely accepted in AML patients despite the fact that validation studies were performed in participants who received exclusively first-line treatment with intensive chemotherapy. For this reason, it is not well established whether the ELN risk groups are applicable to patients on non-intensive first-line treatment. OBJECTIVES - To describe and compare baseline characteristics at diagnosis between patients with AML treated with intensive and non-intensive therapy. - To assess whether the ELN prognostic classification is applicable in these subgroups of patients. METHODS We retrospectively analysed patients with newly diagnosed AML admitted to our center between 2007 and 2020. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3), patients younger than 18 years old and/or patients who received exclusively supportive treatment were excluded. Demographic and clinical data, disease characteristics at diagnosis and first-line treatment were collected. Cytogenetic and molecular characteristics were used to classify patients in ELN risk groups. RESULTS Of the total of patients (n=218), one hundred and fifty-six (71.6%) received intensive chemotherapy treatment, while 62 (28.4%) were treated with non-intensive strategies. Idarubicin and cytarabine based schemes regimens (IA) were administered in most patients (98.6%) who received intensive treatment while the rest received fludarabine based regimens. One patient (0.6%) was treated with danurubicin and cytarabine liposome (CPX-351). Fifty-four (87%) patients treated with non-intensive regimens received hypomethylating agents, mostly azacitidine. Five patients (8%) were treated with venetoclax in combination with a hypomethylating agent. Table 1 shows the characteristics at diagnosis in both groups of patients. Patients who received intensive chemotherapy were younger and had higher leukocyte count, LDH values and a higher percentage of blasts in peripheral blood and bone marrow with a median of 40% and 62% blasts respectively. On the other hand, patients under non-intensive treatment more frequently presented a past history of hemopathy and a higher percentage of bone marrow dysplasia. Regarding ELN stratification significant differences were found between both groups. Patients who received aggressive chemotherapy vs patients who did not, were classified in low (28% vs. 7%), intermediate (36% vs. 58%) and high risk (36% vs. 35%) respectively (Figure 1). At the end of the follow-up, 41% of the patients who had received intensive therapy were alive while only 6.5% of the patients who had received non-intensive treatment were alive. Significant differences in survival were observed between both groups (p<0.01); with 1-year overall survival (OS) of 65.8% for intensive therapy group and 49.6% for non-intensive therapy group. In the intensive chemotherapy group, significant differences in survival were observed according to ELN risk stratification (p<0.01), with 5-year OS of 55%, 29% and 23.9% for low, intermediate and high-risk groups respectively. For low-risk patients, median OS was not reached while it was 20 months for the intermediate risk group and 12.2 months for the high-risk group. However, in patients receiving non-intensive therapies, there were no significant differences in survival among different prognostic categories (p=0.06). In this group, 1-year OS was 25%, 57.6% and 40.7% and median OS was 2.1, 14.8 and 10.1 months for low, intermediate and high-risk groups respectively. See Figure 2. CONCLUSIONS: As validated in previous trials, ELN classification constitutes an adequate prognostic marker for patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with intensive chemotherapy. In our series, this classification does not appear to be a good predictor of survival for patients diagnosed with AML who initiated non-intensive treatments. Further validation in prospective studies are needed to better classify this growing subgroup of patients in clinical practice. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Martín-Rojas: Celgene-BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Font Lopez: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GILEAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELGENE-BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kwon: Novartis, Celgene, Gilead, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Single-Agent Ibrutinib As First-Line Treatment for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) in Routine Clinical Practice in Spain

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136036 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 32-33

Author(s):

Pau Abrisqueta Costa ◽

Javier Loscertales ◽

Maria Jose Terol ◽

Angel Ramirez Payer ◽

Macarena Ortiz Pareja ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Single Agent ◽

Haematological Toxicity ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Treatment

Introduction. Ibrutinib is a first-in-class, oral, once-a-day Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor that achieves high overall response rates and durable remissions in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) including those with high-risk features (unmutated IGHV, TP53 abnormalities, 11q deletion). Survival with continuous single-agent ibrutinib in previously-untreated CLL patients is comparable to an age-matched general population (Figure 1). IBRORS is an observational, retrospective, multicentre study to describe the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with CLL treated with single-agent ibrutinib in routine clinical practice in Spain. This present analysis reviews the subset of patients in IBRORS who received ibrutinib as the first-line of treatment. This series includes a significant number of patients with high risk cytogenetic/molecular alterations (del17p/TP53 M), which corresponds with the approved indication for first-line CLL patients in Spain at the time. Methods. Adult patients diagnosed with CLL treated with single-agent ibrutinib in first-line, or at first or second relapse since its commercialization in Spain (between January 2016 to January 2019) were included in the IBRORS study. Clinical characteristics of patients, efficacy and tolerability of ibrutinib as first-line treatment were analyzed here. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results. 84 patients, from a total of 269 included in IBRORS, received single-agent ibrutinib as first-line treatment. The median age was 71.3 years (range 63-77) at the time of ibrutinib initiation. 56.3% of patients presented with an intermediate/high-risk Rai-Binet stage, and the majority of patients (98.6%) had an ECOG PS of 0-1. 91.7% of patients had at least 1 high risk molecular cytogenetic factor (unmutated IGHV, TP53 abnormalities, 11q deletion or complex karyotype) described in table 1. Baseline comorbidities of patients are described in table 2. Concomitant medication included anticoagulants (9.5% patients; vitamin K antagonist [n=4], Apixaban [n=1] and LMWH [n=3] patients), antiplatelet agents (11.9% patients), and antihypertensives (50% patients). The overall response rate (ORR) was 79.5%; 14/84 (16.6%) achieved a complete response (CR), 14/84 (16.6%) achieved CR unconfirmed, 27/84 (32.14%) achieved a partial response (PR) and 12/84 (14.2%) a PR + lymphocytosis. The median PFS and OS were not reached, and the estimated PFS at 24 months was 84.5% (73.4-95.6%). OS and PFS curves are represented in figure 2. The PFS of each patient subgroup with high-risk cytogenetic characteristics was similar to that of all patients in the first-line cohort: del17p/TP53 mutation (HR = 0.963 [95% CI 0.188-4.928]; p = 0.964), del11q (HR = 0.042 [95% CI 0.000-682.736]; p=0.521), unmutated IGHV (HR = 0.391 [95% CI 0.110-1.394]; p = 0.148). The median duration of exposure to ibrutinib was 17.3 (11.9-25.6) months. Dose reduction of ibrutinib occurred in 17/84 (20.2%) patients, 8/84 (9.52%) due to toxicity (4 hematologic toxicity and 4 non-hematologic toxicity). 27/84 (32.1%) patients had temporary interruption of treatment. 15/84 (17.8%) patients permanently discontinued ibrutinib including 6 (7.14%) patients due to progression, 4 (4.76%) due to toxicity and 5 for other reasons. Safety: 49/84 (58.3%) patients developed at least one adverse event (AE), while 12/84 (14.2%) patients developed at least one serious adverse event (SAE). Twelve (14.3%) patients reported at least one haematological toxicity while 53 patients (63.1%) recorded at least one non-haematological toxicity. Only 1 patient experienced grade 3 atrial fibrillation, which did not lead to discontinuation. The most common AEs are described in table 3. Conclusion. This population of previously-untreated CLL patients, enriched for high-risk genomic features, reflects the initial approval of ibrutinib for the treatment of first-line patients with del17p in Spain. Single-agent Ibrutinib as the first-line treatment in this real world population was effective regardless of risk factors and well tolerated, with a low rate of discontinuation due to toxicity. Findings are consistent with those reported in clinical trials. Disclosures Loscertales: AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria. Arguiñano:AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Hernandez-Rivas:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rovi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pérez Persona:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jannsen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy. Loriente:Janssen Cilag: Current Employment. Villanueva:Janssen Cilag: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Clinical and Biological Characteristics and Outcomes of Richter Transformation : A French Multicenter Study from the Filo Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128053 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4112-4112

Author(s):

Charline Moulin ◽

Romain Morizot ◽

Thomas Remen ◽

Hélène Augé ◽

Florian Bouclet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Long Term Survivors ◽

First Line Treatment

Introduction: About 2 to 10% of patients (pts) diagnosed with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) develop diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, so-called Richter transformation (RT)) over long-term follow-up. The outcomes of pts with RT are variable and poorly understood and there is no consensus on the best therapeutic approach. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, outcomes and factors predictive of survival in a large series of RT from the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO). Methods: Biopsy-confirmed RT (limited to DLBCL and excluding Hodgkin lymphoma) diagnosed from 2001 to 2018 were identified from eight FILO centers. Clinical and biological characteristics of CLL and RT at diagnosis, including cytogenetics, clonal relation with the pre-existing CLL, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status, cell of origin (COO) analyzed by immunohistochemistry and RT score (Tsimberidou AM et al, J Clin Oncol, 2006) were analyzed as well as treatment and outcomes. Overall survivals (OS) were defined as time from CLL and RT diagnosis to death from any cause and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4. Results: A total of 70 CLL pts who developed RT were identified. The median age at CLL diagnosis was 62 years old (range 35-82), and 50 (71.4 %) were male. The median time to transformation was 5.5 years (range 0 to 22 years), with 12 simultaneous diagnosis of CLL and RT. Prior to RT, 20 (29%) pts had not been treated for CLL, 50 received one (n=21) or more (n= 29) line of treatment ; 6 pts had received a novel agent (ibrutinib, idelalisib or venetoclax). The median age at RT diagnosis was 68 years old (range 42-88). All biopsies were centrally reviewed; 38/58 pts (66%) had elevated LDH (>1.5N) ; 35/65 pts (54 %) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm); 10/54 (18.5%) pts had del(17p) or TP53 mutation ; 9/42 pts (21%) had a complex karyotype (at least 3 abnormalities). The CLL and RT were clonally related in 27/27 (100%) tested pts. COO by Hans algorithm was non germinal center B cell-like (GCB) in 26/28 pts (93%). EBV was positive or detected in 5/40 (12.5%) pts. The median of Ki67 positivity was 70% (range 30% to 100%). The RT score (based at RT diagnosis on ECOG performance status 2-4, LDH >1.5 x normal, platelets<100 x 109/L, tumor size >5 cm and >1 prior therapy for CLL) was : low risk in 17 pts (31%), low-intermediate risk in 10 pts (19%), high-intermediate risk in 14 pts (25%) and high risk in 14 pts (25%). The most common first-line treatment of RT was immunochemotherapy (n=57, 87%) including R-CHOP-like regimen (n=48, 73%). Autologous or allogeneic transplantation was performed for 7 pts (11%). Response to first-line treatment was complete or partial response in 26 pts (40%), and stable disease or progression in 39 pts (60%). After a median follow-up of 8 years, 51/64 pts (80%) have died. The main causes of death were progressive DLBCL (n=36, 71%), infection (n=8, 16%) or progressive CLL (n=2, 4%). The median OS of the cohort from CLL and RT diagnosis (Figure 1) were 7.8 years and 9.5 months, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with TP53 disruption at CLL stage, low platelets count, elevated LDH, elevated beta2-microglobulin, high ECOG score, high RT score, EBV positivity and absence of response to first-line RT treatment had worse OS. The ECOG score, platelets count and TP53 disruption remain significant in multivariate Cox-regression. Last, we compared the clinical and biological parameters of two Richter groups defined as: (i) short-term survivors (<12 months, n = 34) and (ii) long-term survivors (>48 months, n = 18). Long survival was significantly associated with elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to RT first-line treatment. Discussion: The clinical outcomes of RT patients is poor and novel treatment options are needed. However, a group of long-term survivors was identified, characterized by elevated platelets count, low LDH, low ECOG, low RT score and response to immunochemotherapy. Disclosures Leblond: Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Thieblemont:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Kyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cymbalista:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Guièze:Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Broseus:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Feugier:gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Major Improvement of Invasive Aspergillosis Outcome Is Not Enough to Improve Overall Survival In Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: Results From a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1244.1244 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1244-1244

Author(s):

Géraldine Salmeron ◽

Raphaël Porcher ◽

Anne Bergeron ◽

Marie Robin ◽

Regis Peffault de Latour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 1244 Background. Voriconazole (V) treatment has been shown to improve the 12 week (W) survival rate of hematological patients (pts) with invasive aspergillosis (IA), including recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). We investigated whether this early survival advantage could translate into a significant increase in overall survival. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive pts who received a transplant between Sept. 1997 and Dec. 2008 at Saint-Louis Hospital and were diagnosed as having IA. The temporal origin of the study was the date of IA diagnosis for each patient. Factors associated with survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models. Separate models were estimated for survival up to 12 W and for survival between 12 W and 24 months (M) in pts surviving longer than 12 W. The deaths of pts with and without IA were analyzed with a competing risk framework. Cumulative incidence curves were compared using Gray's tests. Results. Our study examined 89 IA pts. The median follow-up was 70 M (range, 11–130 M). Two pts did not receive any antifungal treatment and were excluded from subsequent analyses. Of the 87 pts, 42 received first-line V and 45 primarily received a lipid formulation of amphotericin B (n=25), amphotericin B deoxycholate (n=10), caspofungin (n=8) or itraconazole (n=2). The primary characteristics of pts with IA and their causes of death, separated by V as first-line treatment, are shown in the table below. The median survival was 2.6 M, and the overall survival at 24 M was 19% (95% CI 12–30 M) (see figure). Overall, the survival rates of the two groups were significantly different (P= 0.010). However, the differences in survival were quite dramatic prior to 10 M, whereas both survival curves became very close after one year. At 18 M, the numbers of surviving pts were almost identical in the two groups [19% (95% CI: 11–34%) in pts who did not receive V as first-line treatment vs. 21% (95% CI 11–38%) in pts who did]. Pts who did not receive V as a first-line treatment displayed a higher probability of dying from IA than those who did (P=0.004), whereas opposite results were found for mortality in pts without IA (P=0.006). The 24-M cumulative incidence of death from IA was 47% (95% CI 31–61%) in the no V group and 19% (95% CI 9–33%) in the group treated with V. The 24-M cumulative incidence of death in pts without IA was 4% (95% CI 7–14%) in the no V group and 27% (95% CI 14–42%) in pts treated with V. The probability of death from another cause, with IA, was similar in both groups (29% vs. 36% at 24 M; P=0.46). After adjusting for donor type, conditioning regimen, progressive GVHD at diagnosis of IA and cumulated steroid dose (mg/kg) in the W preceding IA diagnosis, administration of V as first-line treatment was found to decrease the risk of death during the first 12 W by approximately 70% [HR=0.31 (95% CI 0.16–0.60); P=0.0005]. Conversely, analysis of mortality between 12 W and 24 M failed to identify any significant predictor of risk of death; however, only 24 pts died during this period. Conclusions. The finding that first-line treatment with V, which is associated with a tremendous improvement in IA outcome, does not translate into an increase in overall survival (even in the context of early diagnosis) is striking. Diagnosis of IA following HSCT, whatever the outcome, appears to be a strong marker for poor long-term prognosis. Disclosures: Bergeron: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau, none; Merck: Speakers Bureau, none; Schering: Speakers Bureau, none. Sulahian:Pfizer: Research Funding, non; Merck: Research Funding, none. Ribaud:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, none; Schering: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau, none; Gilead: Speakers Bureau, none.

Download Full-text

Clinicopathological Features of Nodular Sclerosis-Type Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma In the Elderly: Multicenter Study of Hodgkin Lymphoma In Japan

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2677.2677 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2677-2677

Author(s):

Naoko Asano ◽

Tomohiro Kinoshita ◽

Koichi Ohshima ◽

Tadashi Yoshino ◽

Nozomi Niitsu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Research Funding ◽

The Elderly ◽

Clinicopathological Features ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 2677 Background: Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL), which is characterized by the presence of Hodgkin and Reed Sternberg (H-RS) cells in a background of non-neoplastic inflammatory cells, is divided into four histological subgroups, nodular sclerosis (NSCHL), mixed cellularity (MCCHL), lymphocyte-rich, and lymphocyte depletion. While NSCHL in young adults is characterized by a mediastinal mass and good prognosis, the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCHL in the elderly (NSCHL-e) remain uncertain. Patients and methods: Enrolled patients were diagnosed with CHL between 1986 and 2006 as part of the Hodgkin Lymphoma's Multicenter Study Group. To better characterize NSCHL-e, we compared the clinicopathological profiles of 84 NSCHL-e patients aged 50 or over with 237 NSCHL-y patients aged 49 or younger and 302 with MCCHL. Results: The total of 743 CHL patients consisted of 496 men and 247 women with a median age of 48 years (range, 15– 89 years). The pathological diagnoses were NSCHL in 324 patients (43%) and MCCHL in 303 (41%). NSCHL patients showed a bimodal age distribution, with an initial peak in their 20s and a second small peak in their 60s. We categorized the former as NSCHL-y (49 or younger) and the latter as NSCHL-e (50 and over). NSCHL-e patients were characterized by male predominance and a more advanced clinical stage (53%) than NSCHL-y. Immunophenotypically, H-RS cells had the prototypic immunophenotype of CD15+ CD30+ and Pax5+. NSCHL-e cases showed a significantly higher rate of CD20 (24%) than NSCHL-y (8%, P = 0.001). Furthermore, H-RS cells in 29 of 75 (39%) patients with NSCHL-e were positive for EBV RNA transcripts by in situ hybridization, whereas only 7% of NSCHL-y cases were EBER-positive (P < 0.0001) (Table). Regarding NSCHL-e and MCCHL, no significant difference between these patients was seen in clinical characteristics. Immunophenotypically, NSCHL-e patients showed significantly higher rates for CD3 and TIA-1, while MCCHL patients showed higher EBV positivity (75%). Fifty-five of 63 patients received systemic multi-agent chemotherapy as first-line treatment, consisting of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbacin (ABVD) in 38 patients; CHOP in 8; C-MOPP in 8; and BEACOPP in 1. Overall, 51 patients responded to first-line treatment, 39 with complete response and 12 with partial response. Disease-specific survival of NSCHL-e was poorer than that of NSCHL-y (P < 0.001) but similar to that of MCCHL (P = 0.43) (Figure). Conclusion: NSCHL-e is characterized by an unfavorable prognosis and different clinicopathological features to NSCHL-y, which is considered as typical NSCHL. A number of cases of NSCHL-e might have been associated with MCCHL, with most being EBV-positive. These results suggest the limitations of current histological subgroupings for CHL. Disclosures: Matsushita: Pfizer CO.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxter Co.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Predictors of Early Relapse Following Initial Therapy for Systemic Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2082.2082 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2082-2082

Author(s):

Nidhi Tandon ◽

Surbhi Sidana ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Early Relapse ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL Amyloidosis) is a monoclonal plasma cell proliferative disorder that is characterized by tissue deposits of misfolded insoluble κ or λ light chain derived amyloid fibrils, leading to organ dysfunction. The prognosis of patients depends on the number and severity of organ involvement, especially cardiac involvement. Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), if eligible, alkylator (melphalan) and novel drugs like proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulators (IMiD) have improved the overall survival (OS) during the past decades. But still, nearly half of the patients die within a year of diagnosis. We analyzed the factors predicting early relapse / progression or death (within 12 months) after first line therapy for systemic AL amyloidosis. Methods Clinical and laboratory data of all consecutive patients with systemic AL amyloidosis seen at Mayo Clinic within 90 days of their diagnosis, between 2006 and 2015, was collected by chart review and analyzed retrospectively. Patients who died within 3 months of starting the first line treatment were excluded from analysis. Early relapse (ER) was defined as relapse / progression requiring treatment change / re-institution or death within 12 months of starting first line treatment. Patients in the cohort with ER were compared with patients with a follow up of more than 12 months who had a relapse / progression beyond 12 months or had continuing response at the time of analysis. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi - square and Fisher's exact test and continuous variables using Kruskal- Wallis test and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Multivariate analysis was done using logistic regression model. Results Seven hundred and eighty six patients with newly diagnosed systemic AL amyloidosis met the study criteria and were included in the analysis. Among these, 230 (29.3%) patients had ER within 12 months of starting initial therapy while 556 (70.7%) patients either relapsed after 1 year or had continuing response at the time of analysis. Baseline demographics, organ involvement and type of first line therapy are presented in Table1. The median estimated follow up for the entire cohort from start of initial therapy was 62.9 months (95% CI; 59.9, 67.3). The variables included in the univariate and multivariate analyses for factors predicting ER were age at diagnosis (≤ vs > 70 years ), revised mayo stage (I and II vs III and IV), bone marrow plasma cell percentage (BMPC; ≤ 10% vs > 10%), presence of any chromosomal abnormalities, trisomies or IgH translocations by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), multiorgan involvement [(>1 vs 1) (heart, liver, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, autonomic neuropathy), incorporation of ASCT in initial therapy. In univariate analysis, mayo stage (p<0.0001), multiorgan involvement (p=0.0008) and inclusion of ASCT as part of initial therapy (p<0.0001) were significantly associated with ER, while age (p=0.06), BMPC(p=0.9), FISH abnormalities (p=0.2) were not. However, in multivariate analysis, only mayo stage (III + IV vs I + II; p=0.01) and non-inclusion of ASCT in first line treatment (p=0.0001) were significantly predictive of ER. Conclusions Despite the introduction of ASCT and novel drugs, the early mortality in systemic AL amyloidosis remains high. This study demonstrates that patients with ER are older with higher prevalence of cardiac involvement and multiorgan involvement and higher Mayo stage (III and IV). Incorporation of ASCT as part of the initial therapy was associated with reduced early relapse, but it is difficult to separate the influence of the eligibility for ASCT from the effect of ASCT itself. This will help us in characterizing these patients to better understand their mechanisms of resistance to therapy and gives an insight to the type of initial therapy that benefits them. Disclosures Dispenzieri: GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; pfizer: Research Funding. Kapoor:Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kesios: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Management of Steroid-Refractory Graft-Versus-Host Disease - a Survey By the Transplant Complications Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152305 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2884-2884

Author(s):

Zinaida Peric ◽

Helene Schoemans ◽

Christophe Peczynski ◽

Christian Koenecke ◽

Ivan S. Moiseev ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Working Party ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Clinical Practices ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Prospective Trials ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: As there is limited evidence to guide management of patients with steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) there is a broad variability of clinical practices. To document the current practice and assess the impact of emerging new drugs in SR-GVHD, Transplant Complications Working Party (TCWP) of the EBMT performed a survey among EBMT centers that covered specific treatment decisions on first- and second-line treatment of acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD and cGVHD). Methods: The survey was conducted from December 2020 to March 2021 among EBMT centers. A questionnaire was developed by the study authors and used for data collection. It consisted of 40 questions focused on general approach in the first-line treatment, preferred second-line treatment in SR-GVHD and ancillary care in aGVHD and cGVHD. Results: 145 centers from 33 countries agreed to participate and responded to the questionnaire. First-line treatment of aGVHD was reported as rather homogenous; with most centers (68%) starting with lower doses of corticosteroids (CS) (<2mg/kg) in lower grade aGVHD (grade 2a) and most centers (88%) starting with higher doses (2mg/kg) in aGVHD grades >2b. On the other hand, the evaluation of response to CS was more heterogeneous: at 3 days in 33%, at 5 days in 30%, at 7 days in 15% of centers and depending on severity of aGVHD in most other centers. In the presence of SR-aGVHD, 50% of centers consider inclusion of patients in clinical trials. Although as much as 85% of centers reported to have a standard operating procedure (SOP) for SR-aGVHD management, only 45% (n=66) have an established one or 2-agent second-line treatment; most frequently ruxolitinib (n=46) and/or extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) (n=29). All other centers reported a very heterogeneous practice and listed multiple agents (range, 3-10) as second-line treatment options. In total, the most used agents for SR-aGVHD as shown in Figure 1A are ruxolitinib in 68%, ECP in 59%, mycophenolate-mofetil (MMF) in 27%, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in 25%, high-dose CS (>2mg/kg) in 15%, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in 14%, etanercept in 13%, infliximab in 11% and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in 10% of centers. Clinical practice in first-line treatment of cGVHD again appeared relatively homogeneous; 58% of centers reported to treat mild forms with topical treatment only, unless affected organs could not be reached topically. In moderate/severe cGVHD, the majority (71%) of centers start with 0.5-1mg/kg of CS, in 45% with addition of CNI, while others use higher doses of CS +/- other agents. The evaluation of response was done before 4 weeks in 41% of centers, between 5-8 weeks in 41%, while a minority performed later response assessment or based the latter on organ affection/severity. In case of SR-cGVHD, 56% of centers would consider the inclusion in clinical trials, while only 65% have a SOP on management of these patients. One third of centers (35%) has an established multidisciplinary cGVHD team. Practices for SR-cGVHD again varied significantly, with most centers reporting on the use of more than 2 agents (range, 3-13) as second-line and with most applied agents as depicted in Figure 1B; ruxolitinib and ECP in 68% of centers, CNI in 40%, MMF in 37%, rituximab in 27%, imatinib in 25%, mTOR inhibitors in 23%, ibrutinib and methotrexate (MTX) in 19%, pulse of CS in 17%, MSC in 12% and PUVA therapy in 10% of centers. Conclusions:In summary, this survey revealed a rather homogenous first-line management of aGVHD and cGVHD based on steroids in the majority of centers. However, when first-line fails, the definition of SR-GVHD remains highly variable and SR-GVHD is still treated with a seemingly "trial and error" approach as demonstrated by significant variability of clinical practices among EBMT centers for second-line treatment. However, in line with recently published prospective trials, ruxolitinib comes forth as one of the most used therapeutic modalities in both SR-aGVHD and cGVHD, together with already widely administered ECP. On the contrary, ibrutinib has not emerged as standard of care in this setting. Future efforts should be invested in finding a standardized approach in SR-GVHD by directly comparing most applied second-line agents in prospective trials as well as evidence-based personalized treatment approaches. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Peric: Therakos, Servier, MSD, Astellas, Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer: Honoraria. Schoemans: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: personal fees , Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants and personal fees; Gilead: Other: travel grants; CIBMTR: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BHS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants and personal fees , Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: personal fees; Takeda: Other: personal fees. Koenecke: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; EUSA Pharm: Consultancy. Basak: Saventic Health: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Greinix: Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Therakos: Consultancy. Penack: Omeros: Consultancy; Shionogi: Consultancy; Priothera: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Therakos: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Serum TARC Concentration Kinetic in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma during First-Line Treatment

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148137 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4500-4500

Author(s):

Ilaria Romano ◽

Benedetta Puccini ◽

Leonardo Signori ◽

Michela Zizza ◽

Giacomo Coltro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Treatment Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Stage I ◽

Stage Ii ◽

Categorical Variables ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Difference ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) has been recently identified as a promising predictor of response in patients (pts) with classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL). A correlation between treatment response and early sTARC reduction in HL pts treated with PET-adapted strategy was reported (Guidetti A, Leuk Res, 2017; Viviani S, Hematol Oncol, 2020). In the current study, we analyzed the kinetic of sTARC in HL pts during first-line treatment, with the aim to evaluate its potential predictive value. Methods: We prospectively collected plasma samples of naïve HL pts. Pts were stratified according to GHSG risk categories. Localized HL were treated with 2-4 cycles of ABVD followed by involved field radiotherapy (IFRT); advanced HL underwent 6 cycles of ABVD. Pts with a positive PET-2 switched to an intensification treatment. Pts with positive end of treatment PET (EOT-PET) were treated with BeGEV followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). sTARC levels were measured with a commercial TARC ELISA kit (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, US) according to manufactory instructions. Samples were collected immediately before treatment on day 1 of each ABVD cycle, before IFRT in localized stages, on day 1 of each cycle of salvage therapy, including ASCT, and 1 month after EOT. Samples were analyzed in duplicate. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistic v.27 and GraphPad PRISM v.8; Continuous variables were compared by Mann-Whitney U test, categorical variables by χ 2 test. Statistical significance was defined as P=.05. Results: Of 43 pts enrolled in the study, 4 pts were excluded due to missing samples, and for 3 PET-2 positive pts data were unavailable at time of this analysis; overall evaluable pts were 36. Median age was 33.5 yr (range 17−65), 58% pts were male. B-symptoms were present in 50% of pts. Fourteen pts (39%) were early stage (IA, IB, IIA), 22 pts (61%) were advanced stage (IIB, III, IV). Four pts (11%) were refractory, documented by EOT-PET positivity. For the purposes of this analysis, pts were stratified in two subgroups including stage I pts (11%) and stage II-IV (89%). Median baseline sTARC was 35,454 pg/ml (range 273−183,225); levels were significantly lower in stage I compared to stages II-IV (524 vs 50,606 pg/ml, P=.001). Median sTARC after 2 ABVD cycles (sTARC-2) was 482 pg/ml (range 97−2,071) in the whole population, with a median logarithmic reduction (logRED) vs baseline of 1.83 (range -0.26−3.12). In stage II-IV a significant decrease of sTARC-2 (median 493 pg/ml; range 97−2,071), with a median logRED of 1.94 (range 0.73−3.12), was observed, unlike in stage I where sTARC-2 remained stable (median 393 pg/ml; range 279−805); median logRED -0.03 (range -0.27 to 0.57) (Fig 1A). We then compared sTARC in chemorefractory and chemosensitive stage II-IV pts. We observed an almost significant difference (P=.077) by considering baseline sTARC in the two groups, respectively 95,236 pg/ml (range 53,502−135,787) in chemorefractory and 35,454 pg/ml (range 5,475−183,225) in chemosensitive pts. However, sTARC-2 and the logRED of sTARC-2 were not significantly different between the two groups: 654 pg/ml (range 97−1,564) vs 463 (range 150−2,071) and 2.1 (range 1.6−3.1) vs 2.0 (range -0.7−2.6), respectively. Finally, sTARC measurements after PET-2 and before EOT-PET, and their log variation (logΔ) as compared to sTARC-2, were assessed in chemorefractory and chemosensitive subgroups. In refractory pts, a progressive increase of sTARC was observed: median sTARC was 32,202 pg/ml (range 14,362−71,807) at the time of biohumoral relapse compared to 373 pg/ml (range 166−1,102) in responding pts (P=.001). The corresponding log∆ values were -1.5 (range -2.9 to -1.1) and 0.1 (range -0.3−0.6) (P=.001), respectively (Fig 2B). Conclusions: The current study, with the limitations of small pts number, provides an analysis of sTARC prognostic implications in pts with HL. While sTARC is of limited value in pts with stage I disease, the kinetic of sTARC variation in pts with stage II-IV HL resulted well correlated with treatment response as assessed by EOT-PET. Specifically, an increase of sTARC during treatment after sTARC-2 may predict refractoriness at later cycles. Larger studies are needed to confirm that monitoring of sTARC in stage II-IV HL during treatment might provide prognostic and therapeutic insights. Supported by Legato Zottola, University of Florence Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Puccini: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vannucchi: BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nassi: Incyte: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Potentially Cured Follicular Lymphoma (PC-FL). an Analysis of 56 Cases with Prognostic Factors Evaluation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114896 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5328-5328

Author(s):

Samantha Ferrari ◽

Alessandra Tucci ◽

Gloria Valimberti ◽

Antonella Anastasia ◽

Chiara Bottelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Duration ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Younger Age ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: Advanced stage follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally considered incurable. Although multiple remissions after treatment are possible, relapse is considered the rule, and the time to progression tends to become shorter after each relapse (Johnson, JCO 1995). Over the last decades, after the introduction of monoclonal anti-CD20 antibodies and of better treatment programs, the prognosis of FL has markedly improved from a median OS of 7 years to a 10-year OS rate >80%. Moreover, clinical observations of patients (pts) experiencing very long progression-free periods despite more than one previous treatment failure, have become not rare, suggesting that some pts could achieve operational FL cure. To assess the frequency of those prolonged long-term remissions and search for potential predictive factors, we have retrospectively analyzed the consecutive series of pts with FL seen at our institution. Methods: FL pts, aged >18 years, in maintained remission for more than 5 years after at least two lines of treatment were selected as "potentially cured" FL (PC-FL) and analyzed in detail. Their main characteristics at diagnosis and at last relapse, the different lines of treatment received and the time intervals (time to next treatment: TTNT) between them, were recorded and compared with those of FL pts seen in the same period (control group). Treatment strategies used were grouped and defined as follows: radiotherapy or surgery, for stage I-II (local), anthracycline and/or alkylating agents regimens (Alk/Ant), purine analogues regimens (Pur), monoclonal antibodies/radioimmunoconjugates as single agent (MoAb), autologous transplantation (ASCT). Results and discussion: Among 385 consecutive FL pts seen from January 1987 to December 2011, 56 (14,5%) met criteria for PC-FL. Their clinicopathological features at diagnosis, compared to controls, are shown in Table I. There were no significant differences except for a younger age (51 vs 58 years, p<0.00016) and for a lower frequency of grade 3a histology (p=0.04) in PC-FL pts. First line treatment used did also not differ (p=0.29). Among PC-FL pts, 33 received two, 16 received 3 and 7 more than 3 treatment lines. The median duration of last complete remission was 118+ months, whereas the median duration of the remission preceding the last treatment had been 24 months; disease duration from diagnosis to the last relapse preceding long term remission had been 50,5 months. The last treatments received before long-term remission were variable including local in 10 (18%), Alk/Ant in 5 (9%), Pur in 11 (19%), MoAb in 10 (18%) and ASCT in 20 (36%). Pts characteristics at last relapse and remission duration were similar among different treatment subgroups, except that more pts in localized stage received local treatments. Comparing clinicopathological characteristics of PC-FL pts at diagnosis and at last relapse there were no differences except for FLIPI score, which was significantly lower at relapse (low FLIPI 34% at diagnosis, 68% at relapse, p=0.002). First-line and last treatments were similar except that more pts underwent ASCT as last treatment, as expected since frontline ASCT is not recommended. In 10 pts TTNT after first-line was longer than 5 years and 7 of them are still in prolonged remission (median 11+ years) after second-line treatment, representing a particularly favorable subgroup. In 26 (46%) of PC-FL pts TTNT was shorter than 24 months after first line therapy. Among 14 of them who received R-chemo at diagnosis (POD24, Casulo, JCO 2015), 8 (57%) obtained long remission after ASCT, given in second line in six. Conversely, ASCT was used in only 1 of 12 pts not receiving Rituximab at diagnosis. Conclusions: Approximately 15% of FL pts could currently achieve a very prolonged remission of about 10 years, even after multiple relapses. Its duration was 5x that of the last treatment line and more than twice that of active lymphoma, strongly suggesting the possibility of having achieved lymphoma cure. Younger age and grade 1-2 FL histology at diagnosis, and FLIPI low risk at relapse favored the achievement of PC-FL status. No specific treatment was associated with PC-FL and even an early relapse after first line treatment did not preclude to reach PC-FL, although early ASCT may be more effective for POD24 patients. Whether the achievement of PC-FL status may be related to biological factors will be interesting to be investigated in the next future. Disclosures Rossi: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Lenalidomide in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated by Melphalan-Prednisone and Thalidomide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4075.4075 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4075-4075

Author(s):

Jessica Michel ◽

Sabine Revuz ◽

Stéphanie Tardy ◽

Guillemette Fouquet ◽

Murielle Roussel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Response Rate ◽

Thromboembolic Events ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Previously Treated ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 4075 Introduction. The association of Melphalan-Prednisone and Thalidomide (MPT) is approved as first-line treatment in elderly patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM). This treatment demonstrated significant benefit in terms of overall survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) as opposed to MP alone. Lenalidomide (Len), used in combination with Dexamethasone (Len/Dex), is recommended to treat patients with relapsed MM who received a prior therapy. Len is an oral immunomodulator similar to Thalidomide (T). Both these drugs have identical activity but their safety profiles are different. So, in case of successive use of MPT and Len/Dex, it is legitimate to think that the efficacy of Len is affected by the previous use of T, probably because of the resistance to Len developed by relapsed or refractory patients. Therefore, we carried out a retrospective, multicentric study in order to assess the efficacy and safety of Len in patients with relapsed MM previously treated by MPT. Method. Our survey included 64 elderly patients with symptomatic MM from three French hematology centers. All the patients showed a relapsed MM treated with first-line treatment of MPT. Len was administered at first or second relapse. The main objective was to assess the efficacy of Len in terms of response rate, OS and PFS. Another objective was to evaluate the tolerance to Len and MPT treatments and to identify the predictive factors of efficacy of Len like the response rate, the duration of remission after MPT treatment and the line number of treatment before using Len. Results. The median age of patients at diagnosis was 73.5 years old and the sex ratio was 1. The M-protein was IgG for 64% of patients, IgA for 20%, light chains for 14% and IgD for 2%. Concerning the International Staging System, 35% of patients were stage I, 28% were stage II and 37% were stage III. MPT was administered with a 100mg/d thalidomide dose to 83% of patients. The median duration of T treatment was 13 months [range: 0.1 – 29.5]. The overall response rate (ORR) was 90% with 53% of partial response (PR), 27.5% of very good partial response (VGPR) and 9.5% of complete response (CR). Five patients stopped T because of progression on therapy, 36 because of toxicity out of which 26 because of peripheral neuropathy and 2 thromboembolic events. The median response duration after MPT was 25.5 months. Len was administered at first relapse to 47 patients (73.5%) and at second relapse for the others (n=17). The second-line treatment for these 17 patients was bortezomib-based regimen treatment. The daily dose of Len was 15 to 25 mg, always associated with low dose of Dex, for 83% of patients. Ten cycles of Len/Dex were administered on average. For 23/64 patients, the Len/Dex treatment is going on, 21/41 patients stopped because of progression and 17/41 because of toxicity (hematologic toxicity: 8/17, thromboembolic events: 2/17, general and gastrointestinal disorder: 7/17). The Len ORR was 78% (CR: 3.5%, VGPR: 27.5%, PR: 47%). The median SSP after initiation of Len is 12.8 months. The median OS after initiation of Len is 43 months and the OS rate is 58% at 3 years. Since the diagnosis, No predictive factor has a significant impact on the efficacy of Len. No second primary malignancies were reported. Conclusion. Our study shows that the efficacy and safety of Len is satisfactory, even after a Thalidomide treatment. The ORR and median PFS are similar to published data. There is no increase of toxicity for patients on Len, especially concerning thromboembolic events. With the development of new drugs like Carfilzomib, Pomalidomide and Eculizumab, the perspective of treatment increased as well as the number of lines. The choice of therapeutic sequences must be taken into account. In this study, we show that the MPT – Len/Dex sequence is effective and safe for elderly MM patients. Disclosures: Roussel: celgene: Honoraria; janssen: Honoraria. Attal:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leleu:celgene: Honoraria; janssen: Honoraria. Facon:onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hulin:celgene: Honoraria; janssen: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CHOP) in First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) or Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): The Bright Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.902.902 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 902-902 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Richard H. Van der Jagt ◽

Brad S. Kahl ◽

Peter Wood ◽

Tim E. Hawkins ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Respiratory Failure ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Standard Treatment ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Pharmaceutical Industries ◽

Grade 3 ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 902 Background Bendamustine (B) is an active agent for relapsed and refractory indolent NHL, both as monotherapy and combined with rituximab (R), results recently updated by the StiL study group. This study compared efficacy and safety of BR with standard treatment regimens of R-CHOP and R-CVP as first-line treatment for indolent NHL or MCL. Methods Patients were randomized to 6–8 cycles of BR or R-CHOP/R-CVP (R-CHOP or R-CVP determined by investigator prior to randomization). BR regimen was B 90 mg/m2/day on days 1 and 2 plus R 375 mg/m2on day 1 of a 28-day cycle. Standard dosing and 21 day cycles were used for R-CHOP and R-CVP. Primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority of complete response (CR) rate of BR vs standard treatment (noninferiority margin [ratio] 0.88). Secondary measures included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and overall survival. Tumor response was determined by a blinded independent review committee (IRC) using International Working Group revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. Investigator assessments were compared with those of the IRC. Results Of 447 randomized patients, 436 received treatment (BR n=221; R-CHOP/R-CVP n=215 [R-CHOP n=99; R-CVP n=116]) and were evaluable for safety. Of these, 419 patients (BR n=213; R-CHOP/R-CVP n=206 [R-CHOP 97; R-CVP n=109]) were evaluable for efficacy. The randomized groups were well matched for age (median 60 and 58 years), sex (male, 61% and 59%), ECOG status (64% performance status 0, both groups), lymphoma type (83% indolent NHL, both groups), and Ann Arbor stage (62% stage IV, both groups). Among randomized patients and efficacy evaluable patients, the IRC-assessed CR rate was numerically higher for BR than R-CHOP/R-CVP and statistically noninferior (Table). In the randomized groups, CR rates for indolent NHL were numerically similar between BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP; however, in MCL, BR was statistically superior (P=0.018) (Table). Investigator-assessed response in randomized patients found superiority of BR vs R-CHOP/R-CVP (P=0.0013). IRC and investigator assessments differed mainly in quality of response (CR vs partial) rather than in whether a patient was a responder. For randomized patients, the ORR was 94% for BR and 84% for R-CHOP/R-CVP. Time-to-event data are immature and will be analyzed later. At time of data cut-off, 8% of the BR group had progressed, relapsed, or died, compared with 4% of R-CHOP/R-CVP group. Most patients completed 6 cycles (92% for BR and 91% for R-CHOP/R-CVP), with high relative dose intensity (>96%). Dose delays were more common for BR-treated patients (35% vs 19%), and dose reductions were less common (22% vs 29%). Most common AEs for BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP, respectively, were nausea (139 vs 102 patients), fatigue (113 vs 107), neutropenia (76 vs 85), constipation (65 vs 90), and alopecia (8 vs 74). Laboratory grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities for BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP were lymphopenia (137 vs 64), neutropenia (98 vs 151), leukopenia (84 vs 116), thrombocytopenia (16 vs 15), and anemia (6 vs 9), respectively. The most frequent investigator-reported nonhematologic grade 3/4 AEs for BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP were infusion-related reaction (13 vs 8 patients). Granulocyte colony stimulating factors were given at investigator discretion (per ASCO recommendations) to 29% of the BR group and 43% of the R-CHOP/R-CVP group. Fatal AEs occurred in 6 BR patients (pneumonia, respiratory failure, and sepsis; acute respiratory failure; cardiac arrest; pneumonia; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; lung cancer) and 1 R-CHOP/R-CVP patient (sepsis). Conclusion In patients with advanced indolent NHL and MCL, BR produces a CR rate that is noninferior to that of R-CHOP/R-CVP. In the subgroup of patients with MCL, BR produces a significantly higher CR rate (51% vs 24%). High ORRs were attained in both treatment groups. The AE profile of BR was distinct from that of R-CHOP/R-CVP. Support: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Disclosures: Flinn: Teva Pharmaceuticals : Research Funding. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is FDA-approved for adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that has progressed during or within six months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen. Van der Jagt:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Sponsorship Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, sponsorship, sponsorship Other; Roche: Consultancy, sponsorship, sponsorship Other; Cephalon: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Xanthus: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb : Consultancy. Kahl:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. MacDonald:Lundbeck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Munteanu:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Employment. Clementi:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Employment. Chen:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Employment. Burke:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Download Full-text