Pomalidomide (POM) with Low-Dose Dexamethasone (LoDex) in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received Prior Therapy with Lenalidomide (LEN) and Bortezomib (BORT): Updated Phase 2 Results and Age Subgroup Analysis

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 450-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Craig C. Hofmeister ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 450 Background: New antimyeloma treatments that re-establish tumor response are required to improve survival for pts with advanced, treatment-refractory MM. The MM-002 phase 2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of oral pomalidomide, in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (POM+LoDex), in pts with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have who have received ≥2 prior therapies including LEN and BORT (Richardson PG, et al. Blood 2011;118:abs 634). Updated results from March 2012 for pts and the outcomes of subgroup analyses are presented. Methods: Eligible pts with MM who had received at least 2 prior therapies (including LEN and BORT) and had disease progression within 60 days of their last treatment were randomized (1:1 ratio) to either POM+LoDEX (POM, 4 mg/day for days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle; LoDex, 40 mg/week) or POM alone. At progression, pts receiving POM alone could receive POM+LoDEX at investigator's discretion. Pts aged over 75 years received LoDex, 20 mg/week. All pts received mandatory thromboprophylaxis (daily low-dose aspirin). Pts were stratified within each treatment group according to age. The key efficacy endpoints included the objective response rate using European Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria, duration of response, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and safety. This updated analysis focused on pts on the POM+LoDex arm. Results: The intention-to-treat efficacy analysis included 113 pts in the POM+LoDex group. The mean age of pts treated with POM+LoDex was 64 years (range, 34–88); 99 pts (88%) were aged ≤75 years. Response rates, median duration of response, and age subgroups are presented in the Table. Median PFS and OS were 4.6 months (mos) and 16.5 mos, respectively, in the POM+LoDex group overall. In the age subgroup analysis of pts treated with POM+LoDex, the median PFS was 4.7 mos in pts aged ≤65 years, and 3.7 mos in pts >65 years. Median OS was 19.7 mos in pts aged ≤65 years and 11.8 mos in pts >65 years. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurring in >5% of pts were neutropenia (41%), anemia (22%), pneumonia (22%), thrombocytopenia (19%), fatigue (14%), dyspnea (13%), leukopenia (10%), back pain (10%), and urinary tract infection (9%). AEs led to at least one dose reduction in 26% of pts; neutropenia was associated with a dose reduction in 4% of pts. Overall, 78% of pts who developed grade 3 or 4 neutropenia used G-CSF during study treatment. There were no reports of grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy (PN); grade 1 or 2 PN occurred in 7% of pts treated with POM+LoDex. Deep vein thrombosis (any grade) occurred in 2 pts (2%), both aged ≤65 years. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 46% of pts aged ≤65 years and in 35% of pts aged >65 years. Despite this, only 1 pt in each age group developed febrile neutropenia (2%). The mean relative dose intensity (dose intensity/planned dose intensity) was 0.9 in both pt groups of ≤65 years and > 65 years receiving POM+LoDex. Overall, 21 pts (19%) of the POM+LoDex group died during the study. The most common cause of death was progressive MM (52%; only in 14% of all cases was it due to disease progression); other causes of death (48%) included infections, cerebral/intracranial/subarachonoid hemorrhage, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and suicide in one pt with a history of severe depression. Conclusions: POM, 4 mg/day for days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle in combination with LoDex, is clinically effective and generally well tolerated in pts with RRMM who have received multiple prior treatments including LEN and BORT. POM+LoDex represents an important potential new treatment option for pts with advanced MM and appears active in both younger and older pts, with tolerability similar across different age groups. Phase 3 studies of POM+LoDEX in combination with other agents (e.g. bortezomib) are ongoing. Disclosures: Jagannath: Millennium Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide is an investigational drug and is not approved for the treatment of patients with any condition. Hofmeister:Celgene: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria. Siegel:Onyx: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharma: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Vij:Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lonial:Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, BMS, Onyx, Merck; all < $10,000 per year and disclosed to my institution: Consultancy. Anderson:Acetylon, Oncopep: Scientific Founder, Scientific Founder Other; Celgene, Millennium, BMS, Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chen:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Richardson:Celgene, Millennium, Johnson & Johnson: Advisory Board Other.

Pomalidomide (POM) with Low-Dose Dexamethasone (LoDEX) in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): Outcomes Based on Prior Treatment Exposure

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4070-4070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Craig C. Hofmeister ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Prior Exposure ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 4070 Background: There are currently limited effective treatment options for patients (pts) with RRMM with prior exposure to lenalidomide (LEN), bortezomib (BORT) and chemotherapy. In a multicenter, randomized phase 2 study, POM with or without LoDEX (n=221) was active in RRMM pts who had received ≥2 prior therapies, including LEN and BORT (Richardson PG, et al. Blood 2011;118:abs 634); activity was also observed in those with disease refractory to LEN, BORT, or both (Vij R, et al. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:abs 8016). Here we characterize outcomes in the POM+LoDEX group (n=113) according to the prior treatment exposure. Methods: Pts with RRMM who had received ≥2 prior therapies, including LEN and BORT, and had progressive disease (PD) within 60 days of their last treatment were randomized (1:1 ratio) to POM+LoDEX (POM, 4 mg/day for days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle; LoDex, 40 mg/week) or POM alone. At randomization, pts were stratified by age, prior number of treatments, and prior thalidomide exposure. At progression, pts receiving POM alone could receive POM+LoDEX at investigator's discretion. All pts received thromboprophylaxis (daily low-dose aspirin). The endpoints in this study were progression-free survival (PFS), response rates (using European Bone Marrow Transplantation [EBMT] criteria), duration of response, time to response, overall survival (OS), and safety. Response data according to prior therapy were assessed by investigator assessment. Results: All 113 pts assigned to POM+LoDEX had prior exposure to LEN (100%), BORT (100%), and steroids (100%). Most pts had also received prior alkylator therapy (93%), stem cell transplant (SCT) (73%), and thalidomide (THAL) (68%); 49% had received prior anthracyclines. Regimens immediately prior to study entry included BORT (50%), LEN (39%), cyclophosphamide (13%), THAL (8%), vorinostat (8%), carfilzomib (5%), and melphalan (5%). The median number of exposures to LEN and BORT in prior lines was once (range 1–4) and twice (range 1–6), respectively. The majority of pts (80%) had received >3 prior therapies. The overall response rate (ORR) was 48% and 30% in pts who had received ≤3 and >3 prior therapies, respectively. Of the pts who had ≤3 vs > 3 prior therapies, 9% vs 1% pts achieved complete response (CR), 39% vs 29% pts achieved partial response (PR), 9% vs 12% pts achieved minimal response (MR) and 44% vs 36 % pts achieved stable disease (SD), respectively. ORR was 34% and appeared similar regardless of prior exposure to alkylators (33%), anthracyclines (35%), SCT (35%), or THAL (35%). Median duration of response was also similar in pts who had received prior alkylators (8.4 mos), anthracyclines (10.1 mos), SCT (7.7 mos), and THAL (7.7 mos). Of the 69 pts who had a best response of SD or PD to their last prior antimyeloma therapy, 21 pts (12 SD and 9 PD) achieved a PR and 3 pts (1 SD and 2 PD) achieved a CR with POM+LoDEX treatment. Responding pts had longer time to progression (TTP; 11.1 mos) with POM+LoDex compared with the TTP (4.4 mos) observed with their last antimyeloma regimen prior to study. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events in the POM+LoDEX group were neutropenia (41%), anemia (22%), pneumonia (22%), thrombocytopenia (19%), and fatigue (14%). The incidence of at least 1 grade 3–4 adverse event was 100% in pts with ≤ 3 prior therapies, and 88% in pts with >3 therapies. Conclusions: The combination of POM+LoDEX has demonstrated an ORR of 34% in heavily pretreated pts with RRMM who have been previously exposed to LEN, BORT, steroids, and other treatments. Early treatment of POM+LoDEX (≤3 prior therapies) achieved better ORR (48%) compared with pts who received POM+LoDex later (>3 prior therapies; ORR, 30%). Disclosures: Vij: Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide is an investigational drug and is not approved for the treatment of patients with any condition. Hofmeister:Celgene: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria. Richardson:Celgene, Millennium, Johnson & Johnson: Advisory Board Other. Jagannath:Onyx Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Onyx: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharma: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Baz:Celgene, Millennium, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis: Research Funding. Chen:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Larkins:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Acetylon, Oncopep: Scientific Founder, Scientific Founder Other; Celgene, Millennium, BMS, Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Survival Findings From Comfort-II, a Phase 3 Study Comparing Ruxolitinib with Best Available Therapy (BAT) for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis (MF)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 801-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Cervantes ◽  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
Andres Sirulnik ◽  
Viktoriya Stalbovskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Extension Phase ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 801 Background: Ruxolitinib is a potent JAK1 & 2 inhibitor that has demonstrated superiority over traditional therapies for the treatment of MF. In the two phase 3 COMFORT studies, ruxolitinib demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life. COMFORT-II is a randomized, open-label study evaluating ruxolitinib versus BAT in patients (pts) with MF. The primary and key secondary endpoints were both met: the proportion of pts achieving a response (defined as a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume) at wk 48 (ruxolitinib, 28.5%; BAT, 0%; P < .0001) and 24 (31.9% and 0%; P < .0001), respectively. The present analyses update the efficacy and safety findings of COMFORT-II (median follow-up, 112 wk). Methods: In COMFORT-II, 219 pts with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF and splenomegaly were randomized (2:1) to receive ruxolitinib (15 or 20 mg bid, based on baseline platelet count [100-200 × 109/L or > 200 × 109/L, respectively]) or BAT. Efficacy results are based on an intention-to-treat analysis; a loss of spleen response was defined as a > 25% increase in spleen volume over on-study nadir that is no longer a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median follow-up was 112 wk (ruxolitinib, 113; BAT, 108), and the median duration of exposure 83.3 wk (ruxolitinib, 111.4 [randomized and extension phases]; BAT, 45.1 [randomized treatment only]). Because the core study has completed, all pts have either entered the extension phase or discontinued from the study. The primary reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; ruxolitinib, 11.6%; BAT, 6.8%), consent withdrawal (4.1% and 12.3%), and disease progression (2.7% and 5.5%). Overall, 72.6% of pts (106/146) in the ruxolitinib arm and 61.6% (45/73) in the BAT arm entered the extension phase to receive ruxolitinib, and 55.5% (81/146) of those originally randomized to ruxolitinib remained on treatment at the time of this analysis. The primary reasons for discontinuation from the extension phase were progressive disease (8.2%), AEs (2.1%), and other (4.1%). Overall, 70 pts (48.3%) treated with ruxolitinib achieved a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume at any time during the study, and 97.1% of pts (132/136) with postbaseline assessments experienced a clinical benefit with some degree of reduction in spleen volume. Spleen reductions of ≥ 35% were sustained with continued ruxolitinib therapy (median duration not yet reached); the probabilities of maintaining the spleen response at wk 48 and 84 are 75% (95% CI, 61%-84%) and 58% (95% CI, 35%-76%), respectively (Figure). Since the last report (median 61.1 wk), an additional 9 and 12 deaths were reported in the ruxolitinib and BAT arms, respectively, resulting in a total of 20 (14%) and 16 (22%) deaths overall. Although there was no inferential statistical testing at this unplanned analysis, pts randomized to ruxolitinib showed longer survival than those randomized to BAT (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27–1.00). As expected, given the mechanism of action of ruxolitinib as a JAK1 & 2 inhibitor, the most common new or worsened grade 3/4 hematologic abnormalities during randomized treatment were anemia (ruxolitinib, 40.4%; BAT, 23.3%), lymphopenia (22.6%; 31.5%), and thrombocytopenia (9.6%; 9.6%). In the ruxolitinib arm, mean hemoglobin levels decreased over the first 12 wk of treatment and then recovered to levels similar to BAT from wk 24 onward; there was no difference in the mean monthly red blood cell transfusion rate among the ruxolitinib and BAT groups (0.834 vs 0.956 units, respectively). Nonhematologic AEs were primarily grade 1/2. Including the extension phase, there were no new nonhematologic AEs in the ruxolitinib group that were not observed previously (in ≥ 10% of pts), and only 1 pt had a new grade 3/4 AE (epistaxis). Conclusion: In COMFORT-II, ruxolitinib provided rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly; this analysis demonstrates that these reductions are sustained over 2 years of treatment in the majority of pts. Ruxolitinib-treated pts showed longer survival than those receiving BAT, consistent with the survival advantage observed in previous (Verstovsek et al. NEJM. 2012) and current analyses of COMFORT-I, as well as with the comparison of pts of the phase 1/2 study with matched historical controls (Verstovsek et al. Blood. 2012). Disclosures: Cervantes: Sanofi-Aventis: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Celgene: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Pfizer: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: AdvisoryBoard Other, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Sirulnik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stalbovskaya:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. McQuity:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hunter:Incyte: Employment. Levy:Incyte: Employment, stock options Other. Passamonti:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barbui:Novartis: Honoraria. Gisslinger:AOP Orphan Pharma AG: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Knoops:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harrison:Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

The MM-021 Trial Of Lenalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone In Chinese Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Impact Of Prior Therapies On Efficacy and Safety

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3227-3227
Author(s):  
Jie Jin ◽  
Xin Du ◽  
Zhen Cai ◽  
Fangping Chen ◽  
Dao-bin Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety Population ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background The combination of lenalidomide (LEN) and low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) is approved in China for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) who have received at least 1 prior antimyeloma treatment. The MM-021 China registration study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of LEN + LoDEX (Rd). This sub-analysis investigated the impact of the number of prior antimyeloma therapies on treatment outcomes. Methods MM-021 was a phase 2, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study. Relapsed and refractory MM (RRMM) pts (aged ≥ 18 yrs) were given LEN (25 mg/day on days 1-21) and LoDEX (40 mg/day on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or discontinuation. Pts included in the pharmacokinetics cohort did not receive DEX on day 1, cycle 1. All pts received thromboprophylaxis during the study. The primary end-point was best overall response rate (ORR), defined as the percentage of pts who achieved a best response of at least partial response. Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. Data were analyzed according to the number of therapies that pts had received prior to study screening: 1-2, 3-4, or > 4. Results The analysis cut-off date was January 4, 2013, with a median follow-up of 17.6 mos. All pts in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 199) were included in the safety analysis, and 187 pts were included in the efficacy-evaluable (EE) population. At the cut-off date, 42 pts had completed treatment and 157 had discontinued. Overall, the median age of pts was 59.0 yrs (range 35-81) and 62.8% were male. The majority of pts had advanced disease (85.9% had Durie-Salmon stage III MM); 40.7% of pts (ITT population) had received > 4 prior anti-myeloma therapies; 33.2% had received 3-4, and 26.1% had received 1-2. Most pts had received prior treatment with thalidomide (THAL; 68.8%) or bortezomib (BORT; 63.8%) (Table 1). After a median treatment duration of 8.3 mos (range 0.9-24.8) or 9 treatment cycles (range 1-27), the ORR was 47.6% in the overall EE population, and highest in pts who had received 1-2 prior therapies (Table 2). Median OS, PFS, and TTP were longer in pts who had received 1-2 prior therapies compared with those who had received 3-4 and > 4 prior therapies, and compared with the overall EE population (Table 2). In the safety population, the most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were anemia (26.1%), neutropenia (25.1%), thrombocytopenia (14.6%), pneumonia (13.1%), leukopenia (9.5%), and decreased neutrophil count (8.5%). In general, grade 3-4 TEAE rates were lower in pts who had received 1-2 prior therapies (60%), and comparable in pts who had received 3-4 (71%), > 4 prior therapies (75%), and the overall safety population (70%). There were 2 reports of grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy. AEs resulted in discontinuation of LEN in 5.8% (n = 3), 10.6% (n = 7) and 9.9% (n = 8), of pts who had received 1-2, 3-4 and > 4 prior therapies, respectively. Conclusion Rd is an effective treatment option for Chinese RRMM pts who have relapsed after one or more prior therapies, including THAL and/or BORT. More robust efficacy and higher ORR was observed for Rd in patients who had received 1-2 prior therapies compared to those who had received additional lines of treatment. The tolerability of Rd was similar in heavily and less heavily pretreated pts. Discontinuations were infrequent, even in heavily pretreated pts who had received > 4 prior therapies. Disclosures: Zhang: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wortman-Vayn:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mei:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hou:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; J & J: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

MM-005: A Phase 1 Trial Of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (PVD) In Relapsed and/Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1969-1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Craig C. Hofmeister ◽  
David Siegel ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Jacob P. Laubach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitor ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Us ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background The combination of the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide (LEN) with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (BORT) and dexamethasone (DEX) has demonstrated substantial preclinical and clinical activity in patients with MM (Richardson PG, et al. Blood. 2010; Kumar S, et al. Blood. 2012). Pomalidomide (POM), a distinct immunomodulatory agent, has been approved by the US FDA for patients with RRMM with ≥ 2 prior therapies, including LEN and BORT, and progressive disease (PD) on or within 60 days of completion of the last line of treatment (Tx). POM with low-dose DEX (LoDEX) has demonstrated efficacy in patients with RRMM treated with prior LEN and BORT (San Miguel, EHA 2013; Leleu X, et al. Blood. 2013; Richardson PG, et al. Blood 2013; Lacy MQ, et al. Blood. 2011). MM-005 was designed to identify the optimal dose of POM-BORT-DEX (PVD) combination Tx for a phase 3 trial comparing PVD vs BORT + LoDEX (VD) in patients with RRMM (MM-007). Methods Eligible patients had RRMM with 1-4 prior lines of Tx including ≥ 2 consecutive cycles of LEN and a proteasome inhibitor. Patients must have been refractory to LEN (PD during or within 60 days of LEN Tx) but not refractory to BORT (at 1.3 mg/m2 twice weekly). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined using a 3 + 3 design in 5 cohorts. Each cohort received 21-day cycles of POM (1-4 mg/day on days 1-14); intravenous BORT (1-1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11); and LoDEX (20 mg/day on days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, and 11-12; patients aged > 75 years received 10 mg/day on days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12). The study protocol was revised to include a 6-patient cohort receiving subcutaneous BORT. Thromboprophylaxis was given to all patients as either aspirin or low-molecular-weight heparin. Once established, an expansion cohort was enrolled at the MTD. Tx was continued until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed during cycle 1. MTD was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included safety, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response), duration of response, and time to response (TTR). Results A total of 28 patients across all Tx cohorts is planned. As of April 2013, 22 patients have been enrolled, 21 patients were evaluable for baseline characteristics and safety, and 20 patients were evaluable for response. The median age was 57 years (range, 36-75 years). The median number of prior Tx lines was 2 (range, 1-4). All patients were refractory to LEN and had received prior BORT. 67% of patients had progressed on LEN as their last prior Tx and an additional 2 patients never responded to LEN. At the time of analysis, 14 of 22 (64%) patients remain on study. The primary reason for discontinuation was PD (27%). No DLTs have been observed during cycle 1 at any dose level; thus, the MTD/maximum planned PVD dose is POM 4 mg (days 1-14); intravenous BORT 1.3 mg/m2 (days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for cycles 1-8; days 1 and 8 for cycles 9+); and LoDEX 20 mg/day (days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, and 11-12 for cycles 1-8; days 1-2, 8-9 for cycles 9+). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (29%) and thrombocytopenia (19%). With thromboprophylaxis, no deep vein thrombosis was observed. Despite 62% of patients having a history of peripheral neuropathy (PN) at baseline, only 29% developed grade 1 and 14% developed grade 2 PN; no grade 3/4 PN was observed. Only 1 patient has discontinued due to AE (Tx-unrelated metastatic pancreatic cancer). Thus far, the ORR is 75% (15 of 20 evaluable), 30% achieving very good partial response (VGPR) or better (including 1 patient in stringent complete response). Responses were rapid (median TTR of 1 cycle [range 1-3]). Many responses are ongoing and may improve with longer follow-up. Responses were also observed in patients with adverse cytogenetics. Updated and pharmacokinetic data on all 28 patients are planned for presentation at the meeting. Conclusions PVD was generally well tolerated in this population of LEN-refractory and BORT-exposed patients with RRMM, with no DLTs and no discontinuations due to Tx-related AEs to date. PVD had promising activity in this population of LEN-refractory and BORT-exposed RRMM pts with an ORR of 75% and 30% ≥ VGPR. The maximum planned dose of POM 4 mg/day on days 1-14; BORT 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; and LoDEX 20 mg on days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, and 11-12 (21-day cycles) has been incorporated into the ongoing MM-007 randomized, prospective phase 3 trial comparing PVD with VD in patients with RRMM (N = 782). Disclosures: Richardson: Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: POM is approved in the US but not in Europe. Hofmeister:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Siegel:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Lonial:Sanofi: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Vesole:Millennium: Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Raje:Millennium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding. Zaki:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hua:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Consultancy; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Oncopop: Equity Ownership.

Phase I Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of AZD1152 In Combination with Low Dose Cytosine Arabinoside In Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 656-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
Philippe Rousselot ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cytosine Arabinoside ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 656 Background: Aurora B kinase is a key mitosis regulator that is overexpressed in a range of malignancies, including AML. AZD1152 is a potent selective inhibitor of Aurora B kinase. This ascending dose cohort study was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of AZD1152 in combination with low dose cytosine arabinoside (LDAC), the only agent that has currently demonstrated a survival advantage over palliative care in older patients with AML. Methods: Patients aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed AML unfit for intensive induction chemotherapy were included. Cohorts of 6 patients received escalating doses of a 7-day continuous iv infusion of AZD1152, at doses of 800 mg up to the monotherapy maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 1200 mg, in combination with LDAC 20 mg sc injection twice daily for 10 days. AZD1152 and LDAC were administered in 28-day cycles. If 1 or fewer dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in a cohort, AZD1152 dose was escalated. A DLT was an adverse event (AE) or laboratory abnormality considered related to AZD1152, which was a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥3 non-hematological toxicity (despite adequate supportive care). If 2 or more of 6 patients had a DLT, the dose was reduced or enrollment was stopped into that cohort. The MTD was defined as the dose at which 0 or 1 of 6 patients experienced a DLT. Following determination, the MTD cohort was expanded to 12 patients. Objective response was evaluated by the investigators using AML International Working Group clinical response criteria. AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) were evaluated according to CTCAE version 3. Blood samples were taken pre-dose and at selected times post dose for 3 cycles to determine levels of AZD1152, its active metabolite AZD1152 hQPA and LDAC. Results: At the data cut-off on 02/08/10 (data validation ongoing), 22 patients had been treated with the combination of LDAC plus AZD1152 (n=6 800 mg; n=13 1000 mg; n=3 1200 mg). Mean age (range) across the 3 cohorts was 71.1 (61–82) years, 14 (64%) were male, 21 were Caucasian and 1 was African American. The mean age of the 800 mg cohort was older (75.2 years) compared with the 1000 mg and 1200 mg cohorts (70.3 and 67.3 years, respectively). At baseline, 8 (36%) patients had de novo AML, and 7 (32%), 2 (9%) and 1 (5%) had AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome, myeloproliferative disorder and chemotherapy, respectively. All 22 patients had newly diagnosed AML. All patients received at least 1 cycle of treatment, 10 received ≥2 cycles and 1 received 5 cycles. One patient received an AZD1152 dose reduction (1000 mg to 800 mg) for their second cycle due to a high creatinine level, which was present at pre-dosing. Two patients in the 1200 mg group had DLT episodes of CTCAE grade 3 mucositis. The MTD of AZD1152 in combination with LDAC was defined as 1000 mg. All patients had at least 1 AE, the most common were myelosuppression (febrile neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia in 50%, 36% and 27% of patients, respectively), stomatitis/mucosal inflammation, nausea, diarrhea and infection (each in 45% of patients). The most common grade 3/4 CTCAEs were febrile neutropenia, infection, thrombocytopenia and anemia. There were 3 (13.6%) deaths, 1 in each cohort; 2 were due to SAEs of febrile neutropenia (multiple-organ failure) and hypoxia (fungal pulmonary infection) and 1 was due to an unknown cause. Nine of 21 patients (43%) were reported by the investigators to have had a clinical response (CR + CRi) (Table). Conclusion: The MTD of AZD1152 in combination with LDAC in older patients with newly diagnosed AML was 1000 mg. AZD1152 at a dose of 1000 mg combined with LDAC had an acceptable tolerability profile. Two patients had DLTs of mucositis at the monotherapy MTD of 1200 mg. AEs of febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia were slightly higher than those in patients treated with either agent alone, although many patients experienced these AEs at study entry. The investigator-reported clinical response rate (CR + CRi) was 43%. The development of AZD1152 is continuing with a Phase II study in older patients with AML considered unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Disclosures: Kantarjian: AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Low-dose cytosine arabinoside is an approved agent for the treatment of patients with AML; this study evaluated low-dose cytosine arabinoside in combination with AZD1152, an investigational agent that inhibits Aurora Kinase B . Sekeres:Celgene Corp: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ribrag:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LFB Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; LFB: Research Funding. Owen: AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stockman:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Oliver:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals A Phase I Trial of Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibition with INCB039110 in Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (aGVHD)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 390-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Schroeder ◽  
H. Jean Khoury ◽  
Madan Jagasia ◽  
Haris Ali ◽  
Gary J. Schiller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Steroid Refractory

Abstract Background: Corticosteroids are considered standard first-line systemic therapy for patients with aGVHD, but this approach is effective in only approximately half of all cases. For patients who progress or do not respond to corticosteroids, no specific agent has been identified as standard, and regimens are typically selected based on investigator experience and patient co-morbidities. In preclinical models, JAK inhibition has been shown to impair production of cytokines as well as the differentiation and trafficking of T cells implicated in the pathogenesis of aGVHD. Retrospective studies have suggested that JAK1/JAK2 inhibition with ruxolitinib treatment provides clinical benefit in patients with steroid-refractory GVHD (Zeiser et al, Leukemia 2015;29:2062-2068). Herein, we report preliminary safety results from a prospective randomized, parallel-cohort, open-label phase 1 trial evaluating the potent and selective JAK 1 inhibitor INCB039110 in patients with aGVHD. Methods: Male or female patients 18 years or older who underwent their first allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from any donor source and developed grades IIB-IVD aGVHD were eligible for the study. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either a 200 or 300 mg oral daily dose of INCB039110 in combination with corticosteroids, and were stratified based on prior treatment status (treatment-naive [TN] versus steroid-refractory [SR]). The primary endpoint of the study was safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints included overall response rate at Days 14, 28, 56, and 100, non-relapse mortality, and pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluations. Patients were assessed through Day 28 for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and response. A Bayesian approach was used for continuous monitoring of DLTs from Days 1-28. Treatment continued until GVHD progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study. Acute GVHD was graded according to MN-CIBMTR criteria; adverse events (AEs) were graded according to NCICTCAE v 4.03. Results: Between January and June 2016, 31 patients (TN, n=14; SR, n= 17) were randomized. As of July 25, 2016, data were available from 30 patients who received an oral daily dose of 200 mg (n=14) or 300 mg (n=16) INCB039110 in combination with 2 mg/kg methylprednisolone (or equivalent dose of prednisone). The median durations of treatment were 60.8 days and 56.5 days for patients receiving a daily dose of 200 mg and 300 mg INCB039110, respectively. One DLT of Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was reported. The most frequently reported AEs included thrombocytopenia/platelet count decrease (26.7%), diarrhea (23.3%), peripheral edema (20%), fatigue (16.7%), and hyperglycemia (16.7%). Grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 77% of patients and with similar frequency across dose groups and included cytomegalovirus infections (n=3), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (n=3), and sepsis (n=3). Five patients had AEs leading to a fatal outcome, including multi-organ failure (n=2), sepsis (n=1), disease progression (n=1), and bibasilar atelectasis, cardiopulmonary arrest, and respiratory distress (n=1); none of the fatal events was attributed to INCB039110. Efficacy and PK evaluations are ongoing and will be updated at the time of presentation. Conclusion: The oral, selective JAK1 inhibitor INCB039110 can be given safely to steroid-naive or steroid-refractory aGVHD patients. The safety profile was generally consistent in both dose groups. Biomarker evaluation, PK, and cellular phenotyping studies are ongoing. The recommended phase 2 dose will be selected and reported based on PK studies and final safety data. Disclosures Schroeder: Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Khoury:Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Jagasia:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Therakos: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Ali:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Schiller:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Arbushites:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Delaite:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yan:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rhein:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Perales:Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Chen:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. DiPersio:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Daratumumab (DARA) Maintenance Therapy Improves Depth of Response and Results in Durable Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Following Dara Plus Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (CyBorD) Induction Therapy in Multiple Myeloma (MM): Update of the Lyra Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 863-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Rifkin ◽  
Jason M. Melear ◽  
Edward Faber ◽  
William I. Bensinger ◽  
John M Burke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Background: DARA, a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, is approved in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) and bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) for newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) and relapsed MM (RMM), respectively. CyBorD is a commonly used immunomodulatory drug-sparing regimen for MM. In the LYRA (NCT02951819) study, DARA plus CyBorD (DARA-CyBorD) demonstrated efficacy and a tolerable safety profile at the end of induction. Here, we present updated findings examining the effect of monthly DARA maintenance on the efficacy and safety of DARA-CyBorD in NDMM and RMM. Methods: LYRA is an ongoing, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study conducted at US community oncology centers. Patients (pts) were aged ≥18 years with documented MM per IMWG criteria, an ECOG performance score (PS) of 0-2, and ≤1 prior line of therapy. Pts received 4-8 induction cycles of DARA-CyBorD (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 PO on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22; bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 SC on Days 1, 8, and 15; and dexamethasone 40 mg PO or IV weekly [qw]) every 28 days. DARA was given at 8 mg/kg IV on Days 1 and 2 of C1, 16 mg/kg qw from C1D8 through C2, 16 mg/kg q2w for C3-6, and 16 mg/kg q4w for C7-8. After induction, eligible pts could undergo autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). All pts received up to 12 maintenance cycles with DARA 16 mg/kg IV q4w. Results: A total of 101 (87 NDMM, 14 RMM) pts were enrolled; 100 (86 NDMM, 14 RMM) pts received ≥1 treatment dose. Median age was 63 years; most pts were white (81%), male (64%), had ECOG PS 0-1 (94%) and had IgG (57%) MM; 36% of pts had high cytogenetic risk, defined as a del(17p), t(4:14) or t(14;16) abnormality. NDMM and RMM pts received a median of 6 and 8 cycles, respectively, of induction therapy. Thirty-nine NDMM pts and 1 RMM pt underwent ASCT. Fifty percent of pts received plerixafor; median stem cell yield for NDMM pts was 6.2 x 106 (range 2-15 x 106) CD34+ cells/kg. A total of 85 (75 NDMM, 10 RMM) pts received ≥1 dose of maintenance treatment; 63 (56 NDMM, 7 RMM) pts have received all 12 maintenance cycles. In NDMM pts, ORR was 87%, with 64% ≥VGPR and 12% ≥CR, by the end of induction. By the end of maintenance, ORR, ≥VGPR and ≥CR rates were 97%, 82% and 51% in NDMM pts who underwent ASCT and 83%, 70% and 30% in NDMM pts who did not receive ASCT. In RMM pts, ORR, ≥VGPR and ≥CR rates were 79%, 71% and 29% by the end of induction and 86%, 71% and 64% by the end of maintenance. At a median follow up of 24.8 mo in NDMM pts and 26.6 mo in RMM pts, median duration of response was not reached (NR). Median PFS (Figure) was NR in NDMM pts, regardless of transplant status, and was 21.7 mo in RMM pts; median OS was NR in NDMM pts and was 30.1 mo in RMM pts. In NDMM pts the 24-mo PFS rate was 89% in pts who underwent ASCT and 72% in pts who did not receive ASCT. The 24-mo OS rate was 90% for NDMM pts. In RMM pts, the 24-mo PFS and OS rates were 48% and 64%, respectively. All treated pts had ≥1 TEAE. Common TEAEs (≥25%) included fatigue, nausea, cough, diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, back pain, vomiting, insomnia, dyspnea, constipation, and headache. Grade 3/4 TEAEs were reported in 62% of pts; the most common (≥10%) was neutropenia (14%). Serious TEAEs occurred in 33% of pts; the most common (&gt;2%) were pneumonia, atrial fibrillation and pulmonary embolism. TEAEs led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 7% of pts, with 2% related to treatment. TEAEs resulted in death in 2 pts (nephrotic syndrome, sudden death); both unrelated to treatment. Infusion reactions (IRs) occurred in 56% of pts including grades 1-2 in 52% of pts, grade 3 in 3% of pts and grade 4 in 1% of pts. Most common (&gt;5%) IRs were chills, cough, dyspnea, nausea, pruritus, flushing and nasal congestion. Conclusion: Maintenance with DARA monotherapy for 12 mo increased the &gt;CR rate in NDMM and RMM pts, consistent with observations in prior studies that longer DARA treatment improves depth of response. Importantly, the increase in ≥CR rate was associated with durable PFS and OS. The 24-mo PFS rates in NDMM and RMM pts compare favorably with results for DARA-VMP and DARA-Vd in NDMM and RRMM, respectively. Safety profile was consistent with previous reports of DARA, with no new safety concerns observed with longer follow-up. These data indicate that DARA-CyBorD is a safe, effective MM treatment and that DARA maintenance increases depth of response and achieves durable remissions. Disclosures Rifkin: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Melear:Texas Oncology: Employment; DARA: Speakers Bureau. Faber:Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bensinger:Amgen, Celgene: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda, Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Merck, Karyopharm: Other: Grant. Burke:Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Narang:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Stevens:Astellas: Consultancy. Gunawardena:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lutska:Janssen: Employment. Qi:Janssen: Employment. Ukropec:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Qi:Janssen: Employment. Lin:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yimer:Amgen: Consultancy; Clovis Oncology: Equity Ownership; Puma Biotechnology: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Mitapivat (AG-348), a Pyruvate Kinase Activator, in Patients with Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency: The DRIVE PK Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3512-3512
Author(s):  
Rachael F. Grace ◽  
D. Mark Layton ◽  
Frédéric Galactéros ◽  
Wilma Barcellini ◽  
Eduard J. van Beers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
The Core ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Extension Period

Background: Pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency is a congenital hemolytic anemia caused by mutations in the PKLR gene, leading to a deficiency of the glycolytic enzyme red cell PK (PK-R). Current treatments for PK deficiency are supportive only. Mitapivat (AG-348) is an oral, small-molecule, allosteric PK-R activator in clinical trials for PK deficiency. We previously described results from DRIVE PK, a phase 2, randomized, open-label, dose-ranging study in adults with PK deficiency (N=52) treated with mitapivat for a median of 6 months. Aim: To report long-term safety and efficacy of mitapivat in patients who continue treatment in the ongoing Extension period of the DRIVE PK study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02476916). Methods: Patients were eligible to participate if ≥18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of PK deficiency (enzyme and molecular testing); baseline hemoglobin (Hb) levels ≤12.0 g/dL (males) or ≤11.0 g/dL (females); and if they had not received more than 3 units of red blood cells in the prior 12 months, with no transfusions in the prior 4 months. Patients were initially randomized 1:1 to receive mitapivat 50 mg twice daily (BID) or 300 mg BID for a 6-month Core period. Dose adjustment was allowed during the Core period based on safety and efficacy. Patients experiencing clinical benefit without concerning safety issues related to mitapivat (investigator discretion) could opt to enter the Extension period, with follow-up visits every 3 months. Safety (adverse events [AEs]) and efficacy (hematologic parameters including Hb) were assessed. Protocol amendments during the Extension period required that (1) patients who did not have an increase from baseline Hb of ≥1.0 g/dL for ≥3 of the prior 4 measurements withdraw from the study, and (2) patients treated with mitapivat doses &gt;25 mg BID undergo a dose taper and continue on the dose that maintained their Hb level no lower than 1.0 g/dL below their pre-taper Hb level. Results: Fifty-two patients enrolled in this study and were treated in the 24-week Core period; 43 (83%) patients completed the Core period and 36 (69%) entered the Extension period. Eighteen patients discontinued from the Extension period: investigator decision (n=8), AEs (n=1), consent withdrawal (n=1), noncompliance (n=1), or other (n=7). Thus, 18 patients, all of whom received ≥29 months of treatment with mitapivat (median 35.6, range 28.7-41.9) have continued treatment. Ten of these 18 patients were male, 11 had a prior splenectomy, and 5 had a history of iron chelation. Median age was 33.5 (range 19-61) years; mean baseline Hb was 9.7 (range 7.9-12.0) g/dL. All patients had ≥1 missense PKLR mutation. The doses (post-taper) at which treatment was continued were (BID): ≤25 mg (n=12), 50 mg (n=5), and 200 mg (n=1). Improvements in Hb levels and markers of hemolysis (reticulocytes, indirect bilirubin, haptoglobin) were sustained (Figure). Among the 18 patients, headache was the most commonly reported AE during both the Extension (n=7, 38.9%) and Core (n=10, 55.6%) periods. Reports of insomnia and fatigue during the Extension period (n=5, 27.8% each) were the same as or similar to those during the Core period. There were fewer reports of nausea (2 vs 6) and hot flush (0 vs 5) in the Extension period. Nasopharyngitis was reported in 5 patients in the Extension period vs 1 patient in the Core period. These data are consistent with the AE profile for the 52 patients treated overall in the Core period, in that headache (44%), insomnia (40%), and nausea (38%) were the most commonly reported AEs and were transient (generally resolved within 7 days without intervention). Conclusion: Chronic daily dosing with mitapivat for a median of 3 years was well tolerated, with no new safety signals reported. Increased Hb levels and improvements in hemolysis markers were sustained at the optimized individual doses. These long-term data support the potential of mitapivat as the first disease-altering therapy for PK deficiency. Two phase 3 trials are underway to further study the effect of mitapivat in patients with PK deficiency. Disclosures Grace: Novartis: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Layton:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cerus Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Galactéros:Addmedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barcellini:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board; Agios: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Other: Advisory board. van Beers:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; RR Mechatronics: Research Funding. Ravindranath:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: I am site PI on several Agios-sponsored studies, Research Funding. Kuo:Agios: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Sheth:Apopharma: Other: Clinical trial DSMB; CRSPR/Vertex: Other: Clinical Trial Steering committee; Celgene: Consultancy. Kwiatkowski:bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Apopharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Terumo: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Imara: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy. Hua:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hawkins:Bristol Myers Squibb: Equity Ownership; Infinity Pharma: Equity Ownership; Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership. Mix:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Glader:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Northstar-2: Updated Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Lentiglobin Gene Therapy in Patients with Transfusion-Dependent β-Thalassemia and Non-β0/β0 Genotypes

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3543-3543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis A. Thompson ◽  
Mark C. Walters ◽  
Janet L. Kwiatkowski ◽  
Suradej Hongeng ◽  
John B. Porter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Transfusion Independence ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background Transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT) is treated with regular, lifelong red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and despite iron-chelating therapy, carries a risk of serious organ damage from iron overload and other complications. Transplantation with autologous CD34+ cells encoding a βA-T87Q-globin gene (LentiGlobin for β-thalassemia) is being evaluated in patients with TDT. Interim results are presented here from the ongoing, international, single-arm, phase 3 Northstar-2 study (HGB-207; NCT02906202) of LentiGlobin gene therapy in pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with TDT (defined by receiving ≥100 mL/kg/yr of RBCs or ≥8 RBC transfusions/yr) and non-β0/β0 genotypes. Methods Patients undergo hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization with G-CSF and plerixafor. Following apheresis, CD34+ cells are transduced with BB305 lentiviral vector and infused into patients after pharmacokinetic-adjusted, single-agent busulfan myeloablation. The primary efficacy endpoint is transfusion independence (TI; weighted average hemoglobin [Hb] ≥9 g/dL without RBC transfusions for ≥12 months). HSC engraftment, βA-T87Q-globin expression, Hb levels, detection of replication competent lentivirus (RCL), and adverse events (AE) are also assessed. Patients are followed for 2 years and offered participation in a long-term follow-up study. Summary statistics are presented as median (min - max). Results Twenty patients were treated in Northstar-2 as of 13 December 2018 and have been followed for a median of 8.1 (0.5 - 22.2) months. At enrollment, median age was 16 (8 - 34) years; 5 patients were &lt;12 years of age. Median drug product cell dose was 8.0 (5.0 - 19.9) x106 cells/kg and vector copy number was 3.2 (1.9 - 5.6) copies/diploid genome. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in the 18/20 and 15/20 evaluable patients was 22.5 (13 - 32) and 45 (20 - 84) days, respectively. Non-hematologic grade ≥3 AEs in ≥3 patients after LentiGlobin infusion included stomatitis (n=12), febrile neutropenia (n=6), pyrexia (n=4), epistaxis (n=3), and veno-occlusive liver disease (n=3). One serious AE of grade 3 thrombocytopenia was considered possibly related to LentiGlobin. No patient died, had graft failure, or had detection of RCL. No insertional oncogenesis has been observed. Gene therapy-derived HbAT87Q stabilized approximately 6 months after infusion. In adolescent and adult patients treated with LentiGlobin, median HbAT87Q at Months 6, 12 and 18 was 9.5 (n=11), 9.2 (n=8), and 9.5 (n=3) g/dL, respectively. The median total Hb without transfusions at Months 6, 12, and 18 were 11.9 (n=11), 12.4 (n=8), 12.3 (n=2) g/dL, respectively. At Month 6, 91% (10/11) of patients had total Hb of &gt;11 g/dL without transfusions. Five adolescent and adult patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint of transfusion independence, 4 (80%) of whom achieved TI. The median weighted average Hb during TI was 12.4 (11.5 - 12.6) g/dL which compared favorably to pre-transfusion nadir Hb levels before enrollment (median 9.1 g/dL [7.5 - 10.0 g/dL]). At time of analysis, the median duration of TI was 13.6 (12.0 - 18.2) months. One patient who did not achieve TI stopped transfusions for 11.4 months but resumed transfusions due to recurrent anemia. This patient had a 71.4% reduction in RBC transfusion volume from Month 6 to Month 18 compared to baseline. Marrow cellularity and myeloid:erythroid (M:E) ratios were evaluated in 8 adolescent and adult patients with ≥12 months follow-up to assess the effect of LentiGlobin treatment on dyserythropoiesis. Seven of 8 patients had improved marrow M:E ratios at Month 12 (0.63 - 1.90) compared with baseline (0.14 - 0.48). In patients who stopped transfusions, soluble transferrin receptor levels were reduced by a median of 72% (58% - 78%) at Month 12 (n=6). Updated outcomes in adolescents and adults and outcomes in pediatric patients will be reported. Summary In this update of the Northstar-2 study of LentiGlobin gene therapy in patients with TDT and non-β0/β0 genotypes, transfusion independence was observed in 4/5 evaluable adolescent and adults and 10/11 treated patients had total Hb of &gt;11 g/dL without transfusion support 6 months after LentiGlobin infusion. HbAT87Q stabilized approximately 6 months after treatment and patients who stopped RBC transfusions had improved erythropoiesis. A safety profile consistent with busulfan conditioning was observed after LentiGlobin gene therapy. Disclosures Thompson: bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding. Walters:TruCode: Consultancy; AllCells, Inc: Consultancy; Editas Medicine: Consultancy. Kwiatkowski:bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Terumo: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Imara: Consultancy; Apopharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Porter:Protagonism: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; La Jolla: Honoraria; Vifor: Honoraria; Silence therapeutics: Honoraria. Thrasher:Rocket Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orchard Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Generation Bio: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; 4BIOCapital: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thuret:BlueBird bio: Other: investigators for clinical trials, participation on scientific/medical advisory board; Celgene: Other: investigators for clinical trials, participation on scientific/medical advisory board; Novartis: Other: investigators for clinical trials, participation on scientific/medical advisory board; Apopharma: Consultancy. Elliot:bluebird bio, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tao:bluebird bio, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Colvin:bluebird bio, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Locatelli:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Honoraria.

A Phase I Study of Bendamustine Combined with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1856-1856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Lentzsch ◽  
Amy O’Sullivan ◽  
Silvana Lalo ◽  
Carrie Kruppa ◽  
Diane Gardner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1856 Poster Board I-882 Background: Lenalidomide is an analog of thalidomide that has shown significant clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), both as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone. Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent that is approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that has progressed during or relapsed within 6 months following a rituximab-containing regimen. Bendamustine combined with lenalidomide may be an effective treatment option for MM patients, particularly those with preexisting or bortezomib-induced neuropathy. Our primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of bendamustine and lenalidomide when administered with dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with confirmed, measurable stage 2 or 3 MM that was refractory to or progressed after 1 or more prior therapies, including lenalidomide, received bendamustine by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2, oral lenalidomide on days 1–21, and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until a plateau of best response, as determined by the IBMTR/ABMTR, was reached. Study drug doses were escalated through 4 levels (Table), with 3–6 patients enrolled at each level depending on the rate of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After determining the MTD, up to an additional 12 patients will be enrolled in an MTD expansion arm to better evaluate toxicity and clinical activity. Secondary endpoints included preliminary efficacy, as evidenced by objective response, time to disease progression, and overall survival. Results: To date, 11 patients have been enrolled, with a median age of 63 years (range, 38–75 years). The MTD of bendamustine and lenalidomide has not been identified at this point; currently, patients are enrolling on dose level 3 with 100 mg/m2 bendamustine and 10 mg lenalidomide. Thus far, DLT included 1 grade 4 neutropenia at dose level 2. Nine of 11 patients are currently eligible for response assessment. A partial response was observed in 67% of patients, including 1 very good partial response and 5 partial responses (PR). Two patients experienced stable disease and 1 exhibited progressive disease. Grade 3/4 adverse events included grade 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, hyperglycemia, and prolonged QTC, and 1 grade 4 neutropenia. Conclusions: Bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone form a well-tolerated and highly active regimen even in heavily pretreated MM patients, with a PR rate of 67%. Additional updates on response and MTD will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures: Lentzsch: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is not FDA approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma in the USA. Burt:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Mapara:Resolvyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Spouse is consultant , has received research funding, and participates on advisory board; Cephalon: Spouse has received funding for clinical trial and participates on advisory board. Redner:Biogen: Equity Ownership; Wyeth: Equity Ownership; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roodman:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy. Zonder:Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cephalon: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Speaking (CME only); no promotional talks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document