Interim Analysis of a Pan European Stop Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Trial in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia : The EURO-SKI study

Abstract Background: The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically changed the natural history of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) leading to significant improvement in clinical outcome and survival rates. The option of treatment cessation has recently become of utmost importance. Indeed, prospective trials suggest that imatinib therapy may be safely and successfully discontinued in CML pts with deep and sustained molecular responses (Mahon Lancet Oncol 2010, Ross Blood 2013). The major aim of the EURO-SKI study (European Leukemia Net Stop TKI study) was to define prognostic markers to increase the rate of patients in durable deep MR after stopping TKI. Further aims were the evaluation of harmonized methods of molecular monitoring, assessment of quality of life, and calculation of saved treatment costs per country. Methods: Adult CML patients in chronic phase CML on TKI treatment in confirmed deep molecular response (MR4, BCR-ABL <0.01%) for at least one year (>4 log reduction on TKI therapy for >12 months confirmed by three consecutive PCR tests) and under TKI treatment for at least 3 years were eligible. MR4confirmation was performed in a standardized laboratory (n=6). Primary endpoint was the assessment of the duration of MR (defined by continuous MMR) after stopping TKI. Patients (pts) after a prior TKI failure were excluded. According to protocol, an interim analysis was planned after 200 patients with eligible molecular results at month (mo) 6 were available to test the null hypothesis that relapse-free survival at 6 mo is less or equal 40%. Results: From June 2012 to June 2014, 498 CML pts in chronic phase from 10 countries were enrolled and included in the trial. From June 2012 to July 2013, 254 pts from 8 countries were registered; 54 were excluded (consent withdrawal n=1, protocol violation n=1, not eligible n=34, restart of TKI without relapse n=4, atypical or unknown transcript n=6, missing data n=8). Of the eligible 200 pts, 41.5% were female. Median age at diagnosis was 53.3 years (range, 13.8 to 85.5). In assessable pts 8.7% and 18.2 % were high-risk according to EUTOS and Sokal Scores. 103 pts were treated prior to the start TKI therapy, mostly with hydroxyurea or interferon. 1st-line TKI was imatinib in 97%, dasatinib in 1.5%, and nilotinib in 1.5% of pts. Twenty-four pts switched to second-line TKI therapy due to intolerance, 16 to dasatinib, 2 to imatinib, and 6 to nilotinib. The median time from diagnosis of CML to TKI cessation was 8 years (range, 3-19 years). TKI treatment duration was less than 5 years in 16%, 5-8 years in 36% and > 8 years in 48% of pts. Median duration of TKI treatment was 8 years (range, 3-12.6 years) and median duration of MR4 before TKI cessation was 5.4 years (range, 1-11.7 years). MR4duration was less than 2 years in 8%, 2-5 years in 37%, 5-8 years in 39% and >8 years in 16% of pts. For all eligible pts, a standardized European laboratory confirmed MR4 assessment. Since 123 of the 200 pts (61.5%, 95% CI: [54.4%; 68.3%]) remained without relapse the first 6 mo, the null hypothesis could be discarded (p<0.0001). Recurrence of CML, defined as loss of MMR, was observed in 43/92 pts (47%) treated <8 years, as compared to 23/87 pts (26%) treated for >8 years (p= 0.005). So far, there was a trend for prognostic significance of MR4 duration: 33/71 pts with MR4 <5 years (46%) lost MMR within 6 mo as compared to 28/87 pts (32%) with MR4duration >5 years (p=0.07). No significant difference was observed for relapse within 6 mo according to depth of molecular response at discontinuation (MR4 vs MR4.5 vs MR5). TKI cessation was a safe procedure but a substantial proportion of pts reported transitory musculoskeletal pain starting within weeks after imatinib discontinuation. The phenomenon was described in 30% of Swedish patients as a “TKI withdrawal syndrome” (Richter JCO 2014). Taking into account the cost of imatinib in Europe and time without treatment in the total study population at the most recent analysis, total savings for the community within the EURO-SKI trial were estimated at 7 million Euros. Conclusion: Employing a standardized molecular testing for patient selection within a TKI cessation trial in CML the chance to stay in treatment-free remission could be higher than previously reported. The EURO-SKI trial will further elucidate the prognostic factors but the preliminary results confirm (as reported in the STIM Study) the prognostic impact of the duration of TKI therapy before stopping. Disclosures Mahon: NOVARTIS PHARMA: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria; PFIZER: Honoraria. Porkka:BMS: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hjorth-Hansen:Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-myers Squibb: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Mayer:Janssen Research & Development: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Almeida:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyer Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Berger:Genzyme/Sanofi and Shire: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Mustjoki:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hochhaus:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Saussele:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel, Travel Other; Pfizer: Honoraria, Travel, Travel Other.

Download Full-text

Survey of the Frontline Treatment and Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in a Real-Word Setting: The 3rd Annual Update of the Worldwide Observational Registry Collecting Longitudinal Data on Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients (The WORLD CML Registry)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.1695.1695 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 1695-1695

Author(s):

Ricardo Pasquini ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

David Joske ◽

Luis A Meillon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Disease Status ◽

Asia Pacific ◽

Primary Therapy ◽

Molecular Monitoring ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 1695 Background: A global, prospective registry was established to document the frequency of diagnostic testing, management (mgmt) strategies, and outcomes of patients (pts) with CML. Here, we summarize the reported deviations from published disease mgmt recommendations and the overall efficacy achieved by pts. Methods: 1853 pts (≥ 16 years of age) within 6 months (mo) + 2 weeks of CML diagnosis were enrolled from Latin America (LA; n = 497), United States (US; n = 379), Asia Pacific (AP; n = 465), Middle East and Africa (MEA; n = 209), and Russia and Turkey (RT; n = 303). Baseline demographics and medical history were collected at enrollment; current disease status and mgmt information were collected at approximately 6-mo intervals or with a change in disease status or mgmt. Results: From February 2008 to June 2011, data were available for 1831 (99%) pts. Across all regions, nearly all (93.8%) screened pts were in chronic phase CML. Regardless of the time of evaluation (eval), disease burden was mostly assessed through the use of hematologic counts (Table 1). Cytogenetic testing and molecular monitoring were used in a minority of pts at any timepoint. Hydroxyurea (HU) and imatinib were the first agents used in 61.9% and 29.5% of pts, respectively (Table 2). Overall, 81.1% of pts received imatinib therapy at some time and it was the most common second agent (48.1%) pts received. Among the 49% of pts who had response assessments, subsequent treatment changes occurred most frequently (23.9% of pts) at the 3-mo timepoint (Table 1). The median time from disease eval to dose/regimen modification was 3 days. Of those who received imatinib, 32% had dose modifications primarily for: lack of efficacy (20%), physician request (20%), and adverse events (19%). Of the pts with a corresponding eval at 12 mo after diagnosis, 88% had a CHR, 65.4% had a CCyR, and 42.5% had a MMR (BCR-ABLIS ≤.1%). These data are preliminary; response assessments by treatment, as well as further efficacy analyses, are ongoing. Conclusions: Overall, the majority of pts did not have cytogenetic or BCR-ABL transcript level testing performed per the European LeukemiaNet recommendations. Furthermore, despite availability of more effective therapies for the treatment of CML, HU is still used as a primary therapy in a substantial proportion of pts. Based on this analysis, pts outside the US primarily receive HU as initial therapy rather than tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Overall, second-generation TKIs, such as nilotinib and dasatinib, are infrequently used. These results illustrate the need for continuing education on the mgmt of CML in order to improve outcomes for all pts. Disclosures: Pasquini: Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Cortes:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuitcals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding. Zernovak:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sivarathinasami:Novartis: Employment. Collins:Novartis: Employment. Hughes:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Nilotinib Shows Safety and Efficacy in Older Patients (≥ 65 years) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase Comparable with That in Younger Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: Results From ENESTnd,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3768.3768 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3768-3768 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Richard A. Larson ◽

Udomsak Bunworasate ◽

Anna G. Turkina ◽

Stuart L. Goldberg ◽

Pedro Dorlhiac-Llacer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3768 Background: Data from the phase 3, randomized multicenter ENESTnd trial have demonstrated the superiority of nilotinib over imatinib after 24 months (mo) of follow-up, with significantly higher rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR), and significantly lower rates of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC). The current subanalysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (Nil300) and nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (Nil400) in older (≥ 65 years [yrs] at study entry) patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) with a minimum follow-up of 24 mo. Methods: In ENESTnd, 846 pts stratified by Sokal risk score were randomized 1:1:1 to Nil300 (n = 282), Nil400 (n = 281), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (n = 283). Pts with impaired cardiac function or ECOG performance status > 2 were excluded. Rates of CCyR and MMR by 24 mo, progression to AP/BC on treatment, and safety were evaluated according to age group (< 65 vs ≥ 65 yrs) in the 2 nilotinib arms. Safety data are reported for any pt who received ≥ 1 dose of nilotinib (n = 279, Nil300; n = 277, Nil400). Results: 36 pts (13%) and 28 pts (10%) were ≥ 65 yrs old in the Nil300 and Nil400 arms, respectively. Of the pts aged ≥ 65 yrs, 51/64 (80%) had an ECOG performance status of 0 at baseline and 60/64 (94%) had intermediate or high Sokal risk scores. Of the older pts, 8 (22%) on Nil300 and 6 (21%) on Nil400 had type 2 diabetes at baseline. CCyR rates by 24 mo were 83% and 68% among older pts treated with Nil300 and Nil400, respectively, and 87% for pts aged < 65 yrs in each nilotinib arm. By 24 mo, MMR was achieved by 72% and 61% of older pts on Nil300 and Nil400, respectively; in pts aged < 65 yrs, the respective rates were 71% and 67%. All 5 pts who progressed to AP/BC on treatment (2 on Nil300 and 3 on Nil400) were aged < 65 yrs. The frequency of grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) was low in older pts; no pts had grade 3/4 neutropenia and only 1 older pt reported grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in each nilotinib arm (Table). Transient, asymptomatic lipase elevations were reported in 11% and 16% of older pts treated with Nil300 and Nil400, and 7% of younger pts in each arm. Hyperglycemia occurred in 23% and 16% of older pts on Nil300 and Nil400, respectively, and 4% of younger pts in each arm; regardless of age, no pt discontinued study due to hyperglycemia. Among the 12 older pts with grade 3/4 hyperglycemia (8 on Nil300; 4 on Nil400), 9 pts had type 2 diabetes at baseline. There were no QTcF increases of > 60 msec from baseline in older pts and 3 in nilotinib-treated pts < 65 yrs old (1 on Nil300; 2 on Nil400). QTcF prolongation of > 500 msec did not occur in any pt treated with nilotinib on study. Periodic echocardiograms were done, and there were no decreases of > 15% in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline in any pt treated with nilotinib on study. There were 4 cases of ischemic heart disease reported in older pts (1/35 [3%] on Nil300; 3/25 [12%] on Nil400) and 7 cases in pts < 65 yrs of age (4/244 [2%] on Nil300; 3/252 [1%] on Nil400). No sudden deaths occurred on study. Discontinuation occurred in approximately 25% of older and younger pts with Nil300, of which, 6% and 9%, respectively, were due to AEs/lab abnormalities. Discontinuation from study with Nil400 was 46% in older pts and 19% in younger pts; of which, 36% and 10% were due to AEs/lab abnormalities. Conclusions: Older pts treated with nilotinib demonstrated high rates of cytogenetic and molecular responses and low rates of progression. Nilotinib was generally well tolerated by older pts. In older pts, Nil300 had numerically higher rates of CCyR and MMR and was generally better tolerated (as evidenced by fewer AEs and discontinuations) vs Nil400. These data support the use of Nil300 in older pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Disclosures: Larson: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Bunworasate:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Research Funding. Turkina:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Goldberg:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Research Funding. Dorlhiac-Llacer:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Saglio:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Hochhaus:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hoenekopp:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Employment, Equity Ownership. Blakesley:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Employment. Yu:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gallagher:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clark:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hughes:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Treatment-Free Remission in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase According to Reasons for Switching from Imatinib to Nilotinib: Subgroup Analysis from ENESTop

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.792.792 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 792-792 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Timothy P. Hughes ◽

Carla Maria Boquimpani ◽

Naoto Takahashi ◽

Noam Benyamini ◽

Nelma Cristina D Clementino ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Loss Of Response ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Treatment Free Remission

Abstract Background: ENESTop, an ongoing, single-arm, phase 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01698905), is the first trial specifically evaluating treatment-free remission (TFR; ie, stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI] treatment without a loss of response) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) who achieved a sustained deep molecular response after switching from imatinib (IM) to nilotinib (NIL). Of 126 patients in ENESTop who were eligible to stop NIL, 57.9% (95% CI, 48.8%-66.7%) maintained TFR at 48 weeks. Here we present results from a subgroup analysis based on reasons for switching from IM to NIL, categorized as intolerance, resistance, and physician preference. Methods:Eligible patients were adults with CML-CP who received ≥ 3 years of total TKI therapy (> 4 weeks of IM, followed by ≥ 2 years of NIL) and achieved a sustained MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.0032% on the International Scale [BCR-ABL1IS]) on NIL therapy; patients with a documented MR4.5 at the time of switch from IM to NIL were not eligible. Enrolled patients continued NIL treatment in a 1-year consolidation phase, and those without confirmed loss of MR4.5 (ie, consecutive BCR-ABL1IS > 0.0032%) were eligible to stop NIL in the TFR phase. Patients with loss of major molecular response (MMR; ie, BCR-ABL1IS > 0.1%) or confirmed loss of MR4 (ie, consecutive BCR-ABL1IS > 0.01%) during the TFR phase reinitiated NIL treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained TFR (ie, no loss of MMR, confirmed loss of MR4, or treatment reinitiation) at 48 weeks after stopping NIL. In this post hoc analysis, rates of TFR at 48 weeks after stopping NIL and a Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis of treatment-free survival (TFS; defined as the time from the start of TFR to the earliest occurrence of any of the following: loss of MMR, confirmed loss of MR4, reinitiation of NIL due to any cause, progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis, death due to any cause) were evaluated in subgroups of patients who switched from IM to NIL due to intolerance, resistance, or physician preference. These categories were determined by grouping the reasons for switching from IM to NIL, as reported by the investigators, based on relatedness to safety (intolerance), loss of response/treatment failure (resistance), and the physician's clinical judgment (physician preference); individual reasons included within each category are presented in the Figure. Results:A total of 125 patients who entered the TFR phase were included in this analysis; 1 patient who was found to have had atypical transcripts was excluded. Among these 125 patients, the reasons for switching to NIL were categorized as intolerance in 51 patients (40.8%), resistance in 30 patients (24.0%), and physician preference in 44 patients (35.2%). The proportion of patients who maintained TFR at 48 weeks after stopping NIL was generally similar across the 3 subgroups: 30 of 51 (58.8%; 95% CI, 44.2%-72.4%) in the intolerance subgroup, 16 of 30 (53.3%; 95% CI, 34.3%-71.7%) in the resistance subgroup, and 27 of 44 (61.4%; 95% CI, 45.5%-75.6%) in the physician preference subgroup. KM analysis of TFS showed that in all 3 subgroups, the majority of TFS events occurred within the first 24 weeks after stopping NIL (Figure). There were no notable differences in the kinetics of TFS events among subgroups. The KM-estimated median duration of TFS was not reached by the data cutoff date in all 3 subgroups. Conclusion: Primary analysis from ENESTop showed that among patients with CML-CP who achieved a sustained MR4.5after switching from IM to NIL, 57.9% of those who stopped NIL maintained TFR at 48 weeks. In the present analysis, TFR was maintained at 48 weeks after stopping NIL by > 50% of patients in the intolerance, resistance, and physician preference subgroups, with generally similar results across subgroups. These findings suggest that the rate of successful TFR following second-line NIL does not differ based on the reasons for switching from IM to NIL. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Hughes: Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG): Other: Chair of the CML/MPN Disease Group. Boquimpani:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Takahashi:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Shuvaev:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis pharma: Honoraria. Ailawadhi:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Lipton:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Turkina:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Moiraghi:BMS: Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Speakers Bureau. Nicolini:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sacha:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Adamed: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kim:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fellague-Chebra:Novartis: Employment. Acharya:Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.: Employment. Krunic:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jin:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mahon:BMS: Honoraria; PFIZER: Honoraria; NOVARTIS PHARMA: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Second Treatment Free Remission after Combination Therapy with Ruxolitinib Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147954 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2555-2555

Author(s):

Kendra Sweet ◽

Ehab L. Atallah ◽

Jerry P. Radich ◽

Mei-Jie Zhang ◽

Eva Sahakian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment Free Remission ◽

One Year

Abstract Background: Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is feasible in a subset of CML patients who have maintained a deep molecular response for at least two years. Numerous discontinuation trials have been performed and consistently show approximately 50% of patients relapse after stopping TKIs. A recent study examining rates of treatment free remission (TFR) after a second attempt at stopping TKIs found, with a median follow up time of 38.3 months, 64.3% of patients had a molecular relapse (defined as a loss of major molecular response (MMR)). At 12, 24 and 36 months, TFR rates were 48%, 42% and 35%, respectively. These data suggest some patients with a history of molecular relapse upon TKI cessation could successfully stop treatment on a subsequent attempt, yet the majority will relapse a second time. 'Complete eradication' of CML remains elusive in most patients likely as a result of minimal residual disease (MRD), which is the result of BCR-ABL independent drug resistance. More specifically, CML cells that reside in sanctuary sites such as the bone marrow adhere to fibronectin and demonstrate cell adhesion mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR). The bone marrow microenvironment contains many cytokines and growth factors capable of inducing STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation via the JAK-STAT pathway leading to protection against TKI-induced cell death. Inhibiting JAK2 and TYK2 leads to complete inhibition of pSTAT3-Y705, thereby implicating the role of activation of JAK2 and TYK2 in STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation and resistance towards BCR-ABL TKI-induced cell death. A phase I clinical trial combined ruxolitinib, which inhibits JAK2 and TYK2, plus nilotinib in chronic phase (CP) CML patients and found that ruxolitinib 15mg PO BID was safe and well tolerated with 4/10 patients achieving undetectable BCR-ABL1 transcripts by PCR. Study Design and Methods: This single arm phase II study (NCT03610971) will enroll 41 subjects from the H Jean Khoury Cure CML Consortium. Eligible subjects must have a confirmed diagnosis of CP-CML and have previously attempted to discontinue TKI therapy per NCCN guidelines and had molecular recurrence, defined as loss of MMR, and were restarted on TKI. This trial combines ruxolitinib 15mg BID plus BCR-ABL TKI (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib or bosutinib) for 12 28-day cycles in the combination treatment phase (CTP). RQ-PCR to measure BCR-ABL transcripts will be checked at screening and every three months during the CTP. In the event that a subject experiences intolerance to a TKI, has confirmed loss of MMR, or loss of MR4.5 (>0.0032% IS) on two central PCR results, or discontinues ruxolitinib, the subject will be removed from CTP and enter into long term follow-up (LTFU). CTP phase will be followed by further RQ-PCR screening for the concurrent TFR phase. At this time ruxolitinib will be discontinued and any subject who has met the criteria for the TFR phase will be enrolled. During the TFR phase, subjects will discontinue their TKI and be monitored off treatment with RQ-PCR checked monthly for the first year, every six weeks for year two, and every 12 weeks during year three. Upon molecular recurrence, defined as loss of MMR, TKIs will be restarted. The primary endpoint is the 12-month TFR rate subsequent to completion of 12 cycles of combination therapy; however, subjects will remain in the TFR phase for three years. Therefore, the total duration of the trial will be approximately five years (one year on CTP + three years in the TFR phase + one-year LTFU). Study statistical design was calculated to yield a one-sided type I error rate of 0.025 and power of 65% when the true one-year relapse rate is 35%. This study will additionally assess patient-reported outcomes in conjunction with RQ-PCR testing. PROMIS and other measures will be self-administered through REDCap. Correlative studies will include comparing changes in pSTAT3 in K562 and KU812 cell lines using plasma from CML patients being treated with TKIs plus ruxolitinib, using the plasma inhibitory assay technique. Changes in pSTAT3 and pSTAT5 will be correlated with clinical response and rate of TFR. Additional correlatives include multiparameter flow-based assessment of the T-cell compartment (activity/polarization) as well as natural killer cell fractions in CML patients at various time points (TKIs alone, TKIs plus ruxolitinib and during TFR). Thus far, 14 patients have been enrolled. Disclosures Sweet: Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Atallah: Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Radich: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thompson: Novartis/ Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Mauro: Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharma / SPARC: Research Funding. Pinilla Ibarz: AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, TG Therapeutics, Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Advisory; Sellas: Other: ), patents/royalties/other intellectual property; MEI, Sunesis: Research Funding; AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Takeda: Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Ruxolitinib is being used off-label in chronic myeloid leukemia

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Bosutinib in Imatinib-Resistant Vs Dasatinib/Nilotinib-Resistant Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results from the Phase 4 BYOND Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122230 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1650-1650 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

B. Douglas Smith ◽

Tim H Brümmendorf ◽

Gail J. Roboz ◽

Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽

Aude Charbonnier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Imatinib Resistant ◽

Equity Ownership

Introduction: The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) bosutinib is approved for patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)+ chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant/intolerant to prior therapy and newly diagnosed patients in chronic phase (CP). Methods: The ongoing phase 4 BYOND study (NCT02228382) is further evaluating the efficacy and safety of bosutinib for CML resistant/intolerant to prior TKIs. Patients were administered bosutinib at a starting dose of 500 mg once daily (QD). Primary results were previously reported. Here, we report the efficacy of bosutinib 500 mg QD in patients with Ph+ CP CML and resistance to imatinib (but not to nilotinib or dasatinib) vs patients with resistance to ≥1 second-generation TKI (dasatinib and/or nilotinib), as well as in patients with intolerance to all prior TKIs. Data are reported at ≥1 year after last enrolled patient; 85% of patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Results: Of 163 patients who received bosutinib, 156 had Ph+ CP CML: 52 had resistance only to imatinib, 31 had resistance to dasatinib/nilotinib, and 73 were intolerant to all prior TKIs. Corresponding median treatment duration (range) was 24.1 (0.2-42.2), 8.9 (0.9-41.6), and 25.3 (0.4-41.9) months, and median dose intensity (range) was 360 (125-500), 431 (195-561) and 292 (80-500) mg/day. In all, 69.2%, 41.9%, and 53.4% of imatinib-resistant, dasatinib/nilotinib-resistant, and TKI-intolerant patients, respectively, were still receiving treatment as of the data cutoff date. The main reason for discontinuation was adverse events (AEs), with 10 (19.2%), 8 (25.8%), and 21 (28.8%) imatinib-resistant, dasatinib/nilotinib-resistant, and TKI-intolerant patients, respectively, discontinuing due to AEs. Corresponding discontinuations due to insufficient response occurred in 2 (3.8%), 5 (16.1%), and 1 (1.4%) patients. No patient experienced on-treatment transformation to advanced phase CML or discontinued treatment due to disease progression. In the evaluable cytogenetic population, cumulative major cytogenetic response (MCyR) rates were 85.4%, 69.0%, and 88.1% in imatinib-resistant, dasatinib/nilotinib-resistant, and TKI-intolerant patients, respectively (Table). The majority of patients, across all cohorts, achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). In the evaluable molecular population, cumulative major molecular response (MMR) rates were 72.3%, 44.8%, and 82.2% in imatinib-resistant, dasatinib/nilotinib-resistant, and TKI-intolerant patients, respectively; the 50th percentile of the cumulative incidence curve was 5.66 months, not reached and 3.22 months, respectively. Correspondingly, 59.6%, 24.1%, and 68.5% achieved molecular response (MR)4, and 48.9%, 17.2%, and 56.2% achieved MR4.5. In imatinib-resistant, dasatinib/nilotinib-resistant, and TKI-intolerant patients, respectively, Kaplan-Meier estimated overall survival rates (95% confidence interval) were 96.1% (85.2-99.0), 100% (100-100), and 98.6% (90.5-99.8) at 1 year, and 96.1% (85.2-99.0), 92.6% (73.4-98.1), and 97.2% (89.2-99.3) at 2 years with 4, 3, and 3 deaths occurring on study. Conclusions: Cytogenetic and molecular responses were seen in a high proportion of patients with Ph+ CP CML and TKI-resistance or TKI-intolerance. Response rates were similar between patients with resistance to imatinib and patients who were intolerant to all prior TKIs. Although to a lesser degree, responses were also seen in patients with resistance to second-generation TKIs, including patients achieving MR despite the shorter treatment duration. These results further support bosutinib use for patients with Ph+ CP CML and resistance/intolerance to prior TKIs. Disclosures Smith: Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy. Brümmendorf:Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen: Employment; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Roboz:AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eisai: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orsenix: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sandoz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argenx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amphivena: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Trovagene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gambacorti-Passerini:Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Charbonnier:Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Viquiera:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leip:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Giles:Novartis: Consultancy; Epigene Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy, Other: leadership, stock/other ownership ; Actuate Therapeutics Inc: Employment. Ernst:Novartis: Research Funding. Hochhaus:Incyte: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Rosti:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Following Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Dose-Reductions

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3093.3093 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3093-3093

Author(s):

Jee Hyun Kong ◽

Hanna Jean Khoury ◽

Elliott F. Winton ◽

Leonard T. Heffner ◽

Manila Gaddh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Reduction ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Society Research

Abstract Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are overall well tolerated in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) s, but more than 30% require dose reduction or change to another TKIs due to intolerance. Impact of TKI dose-reduction on outcomes in a "real world" setting is unknown, thus, we evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of chronic phase (CP)-CML patients who received doses of TKI lower than the label/FDA recommendation. Method: CP-CML with at least 12 months of follow-up, with ISBCR/ABL1 available after dose reduction were selected. Last TKI was defined as TKI which were taken at the last follow up visit or before disease progression to accelerated (AP) or blast phase (BP). FDA approved doses of imatinib (IM), dasatinib (DAS), nilotinib (NIL), bosutinib (BOS), and ponatinib (PON) were 400mg, 100mg, 600mg (300mg BID), 500mg, and 45mg, respectively . Results: Between January 2005 and April 2016, 173 CP-CML patients, started IM (75%), DAS (18%) NIL (5%) and PON, BOS on clinical trial in 2%. Overall Fifty-eight (33.5%) patients had TKI dose reduction. IM (n=15) dose was reduced to 75% (range, 25-75), DAS (n=15) to 50% (range, 20-80), NIL (n=15) to 50% (range, 13-67), BOS (n=15) to 80% (range, 40-80) and PON (n=15) to 33% (range, 33-67). Median age for patients that received dose-reduced TKI was 55 (range, 18-88), and 27% received > 3 prior TKIs. With a median follow up of 53.6 (range 13.4-183.7) months, only 1 progressed to AP, and none to BP. Overall 60% achieved MMR. Among 35 patients who achieved MMR before dose reduction, MMR was maintained in 25 (71.4%) for a median of 17.2 (2-97.9) months from dose-reduction. CMR was achieved in patients on a maintenance dose of IM, 100mg QD (n=8); DAS, 20mg QD (n=4); NIL 300mg QD (n=3) and BOS, 200mg QD (n=3). Conclusion: Similar to data reported from clinical trials, TKI dose reduction appears to be safe and associated with high response rates. This data confirms that the minimal effective dose for each TKI remains to be defined. Disclosures Heffner: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Jillella:Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Research Funding. Kota:Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

A Retrospective Analysis about Frequency of Monitoring in Italian Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients after Discontinuation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129335 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4153-4153

Author(s):

Matteo Emidio Dragani ◽

Giovanna Rege Cambrin ◽

Paola Berchialla ◽

Irene Dogliotti ◽

Gianantonio Rosti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Major Molecular Response ◽

Molecular Monitoring ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Tki Discontinuation

Background: Successful tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) discontinuation has been obtained in some patients (pts) with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). Careful molecular monitoring after discontinuation is the key to guarantee the safety, in terms of prompt resumption of therapy according to retreatment threshold criteria. It was observed that the majority of relapses usually occur during the first 6 months after TKI discontinuation [Saussele S, Lancet Oncol 2018; Etienne G, JCO 2017], accounting for the monthly quantitative PCR (qPCR) that all prospective protocols included in the trial design at least during the first half-year. Two studies [Kong HJ, Cancer 2017; Shanmuganathan N, Blood 2019] investigated if performing molecular analysis with a different and less "cautious" timeframe yields comparable efficacy with logistical issues reduction. Here we retrospectively evaluated how molecular monitoring has been conducted in Italy on a cohort of patients not included in any prospective trial with follow-up visits. Methods: The outcome of Italian patients with CP-CML who discontinued TKIs per clinical practice has recently been reported [Fava C, Haematologica 2019]. For the purpose of the present study, all the 32 participating centers were required to provide dates and molecular results available for each enrolled patient in the first 24 months after TKI stop. Descriptive analysis was carried out. The average time to the loss of major molecular response (MMR), the frequency of the visits (monitoring) and the occurrence of loss of MMR within the first 6 months, between 6-12 months, and 13-24 months were computed. When appropriate non-parametric tests were used to test for differences. Results: 227 chronic phase CML pts were included in this sub-analysis. Median age at TKI discontinuation was 58.73 years and median follow up since TFR was 2.03 years. In this timeframe every patient had a mean of 7.95 appointments for molecular evaluation. Overall, 1804 analysis were performed, of which 18.2% happened in the first three months and 38.2% in the first six months. During the first three months of TKI discontinuation, 40 pts (17.6%) didn't have any molecular assessment; 78 pts (34.4%) had only 1 qPCR performed, 77 pts (33.9%) 2 qPCR, 31 pts (13.7%) 3 qPCR and 1 pt (0.4%) 4 qPCR. For the first six months after TKI stop, 7 pts (3.1%) didn't undergo any BCR-ABL1 evaluation; 37 pts (16.3%) had only 1 analysis, 60 pts (26.4%) 2 analysis, 37 pts (16.3%) 3 analysis, 28 pts (12.3%) were evaluated 4 times, 40 pts (17.6%) 5 times, 17 pts (7.5%) 6 times and only 1 pt (0.4%) 7 times. The majority of visits fell between the 3rd and the 7th month after TKI interruption (Figure 1) with 84 pts (52.2%) being evaluated at month 3, 96 pts (59.6%) at month 4, 80 pts (49.7%) at month 5, 89 pts (55.3%) at month 6, 101 pts (62.7%) at month 7. In the first six months the visits occurred with a mean interval of 1.44 months; between months 7-12 molecular evaluations were performed every 1.94 months; during the second year of discontinuation (months 13-24) every 2.89 months (p<0.001). Seventy-one pts lost major molecular response (MMR) in a mean time of 5.56 months. As expected, 55 pts (77.5%) lost MMR during the first six months whereas 16 pts (22.6%) relapsed later on: 3 pts (4.2) relapsed during the first month, 7 pts (9.9%) after two months, 13 pts (18.3%) after three, 19 pts (26.8%) after four, 8 pts (11.3%) after five months and 5 pts (7%) at six months. Only 6 patients lost MMR after 12 months of follow-up in TFR. All patients regained at least MMR after TKI resumption, and no progression occurred. Finally, we evaluated the number of patients who would experience a delay in the diagnosis of MMR loss if a three-months monitoring schedule was adopted. In the first 6 months, 15 pts (27.3%) would have a one month delay, 22 (40%) a 2 months delay; 18 pts (32.7%) would have a right timing. Very few patients would experience a delay in the following months (Figure 2). Discussion: The safety of TFR relies consistently on the management of patients off-therapy especially during the first 6 months, when molecular relapses more often occur. Our retrospective analysis showed that a less intense frequency of monitoring did not affect the success of TFR nor put pts at risk of progression. However, these data confirm that the first 6 months off-treatment require a more stringent follow-up for early detection of MMR loss. Disclosures Rosti: BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Castagnetti:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squiib: Consultancy, Honoraria. Capodanno:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Ferrero:Novartis: Honoraria. Crugnola:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Elena:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Breccia:Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Iurlo:Novartis: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Incyte: Other: Speaker Honoraria. Bocchia:BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Lunghi:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Cedrone:BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Sgherza:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Santoro:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Giai:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Caocci:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Levato:Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Abruzzese:BMS: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Saglio:Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Jansen: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Fava:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Generic Versus Branded Imatinib As Frontline Therapy in Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Italy: A Case-Control Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131272 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5909-5909

Author(s):

Massimiliano Bonifacio ◽

Mario Tiribelli ◽

Gianni Binotto ◽

Maria Cristina Miggiano ◽

Marco Basso ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Historical Cohort ◽

Molecular Responses ◽

Sokal Score

Introduction. Imatinib is the most commonly used frontline drug in chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients worldwide. In early 2017 a generic formulation of imatinib was introduced in Italy and uniformly replaced branded imatinib (Glivec®), upon requirement of regional health authorities. In the last years various groups reported on the efficacy and safety of generic imatinib with conflicting results, partly related to substandard pharmaceutical quality of some products used in developing countries. In a multicenter cohort of 294 patients treated in Italy with branded imatinib for at least 6 months and then switched to generic imatinib we observed that the majority of patients maintained or improved their molecular response. Here, we analyzed patients who received generic imatinib since diagnosis. Aims. To analyze the rates of molecular responses at 3, 6 and 12 months and of treatment discontinuation in CML patients treated frontline with generic imatinib, compared to a case-matched historical cohort of CML patients who received frontline branded imatinib at our institutions. Methods. We analyzed 31 newly diagnosed CP-CML patients consecutively enrolled in a prospective observational registry between January 2017 and July 2018, treated frontline with generic imatinib 400 mg/day (diverse manufacturers) and evaluable for all the ELN2013 molecular milestones (if not discontinued earlier). They were compared to a retrospective cohort of 31 patients, matched for age, gender, and Sokal risk, diagnosed between 2007 and 2014 and treated with branded imatinib 400 mg/day for at least 24 months before eventual switching to a generic formulation. Definitions of molecular responses were made according to the ELN2013 recommendations. Results. A total of 62 patients were included in the analysis: 31 patients (21 males and 10 females) treated with generic imatinib ("cases") and 31 treated with branded imatinib ("controls"). Median age at diagnosis of the cases was 68 years (range 33-89), Sokal score was low/intermediate/high in 8 (26%), 19 (61%) and 4 (13%) patients, respectively. The controls were matched for gender, age (+/- 4 years, median age 68, range 35-85) and Sokal score. As median follow-up time for the cases was 18.6 months (range 2.2-28.5), controls were censored at 24 months after imatinib start. Optimal molecular response at 3 months was attained in 23/30 (76.7%) cases and in 18/29 (62%) controls (p=0.35); one case died after 2 months of imatinib therapy for a CML-unrelated cause, while 2 controls were molecularly not evaluable. At 6 months, 17/29 (58.6%) cases and 17/30 (56.7%) controls achieved BCR/ABL transcript <1%, respectively (p=1). At 12 months, MMR was attained by 14/30 (46.7%) cases and by 13/29 (44.8%) controls (p=1). Twelve out of 31 patients (38.7%) permanently discontinued generic imatinib due to warning/failure response (n=6), intolerance (n=4) or death while on treatment at 2 and 13 months (meningoencephalitis of unknown origin and cardiovascular event, respectively). Among patients treated with branded imatinib, 12/31 (38.7%) stopped within the 24th month of therapy for resistance (n=8), intolerance (n=3) or death at 16 months (acute renal failure). No patient receiving generic imatinib progressed to advanced phase, while one control developed a blast crisis at 6 months of branded imatinib and deceased shortly after. Estimated overall survival at 24 months in cases and controls was 92.5% and 93.1%, respectively. Conclusions. Our preliminary data suggest an equivalent efficacy of generic imatinib compared to a matched population of historical patients treated with the originator drug in Italy. A continue pharmacovigilance by reporting efficacy and safety outcomes of generic drugs is needed to ensure an optimal management of CML patients. Disclosures Bonifacio: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Tiribelli:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Krampera:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

BCR-ABL Fusion Transcript Do Not Significantly Influence the Outcome of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients In Early Chronic Phase Treated with Imatinib Mesylate: a GIMEMA CML WP Analysis.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1230.1230 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1230-1230

Author(s):

Fausto Castagnetti ◽

Gabriele Gugliotta ◽

Francesca Palandri ◽

Massimo Breccia ◽

Giorgina Specchia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Fusion Transcript ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 1230 Background: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the presence of the BCR-ABL fusion gene. Different types of BCR-ABL transcripts can be found, due to different genomic breakpoints and alternative splicing. The most frequent transcripts are the e13a2 (b2a2) and the e14a2 (b3a2), that codify for a p210 protein. Occasionally, both transcripts may be present. In the imatinib (IM) era, few data about the prognostic significance of the transcript type are available, particularly in the setting of early chronic phase (ECP): one study suggested that patients with the b2a2 transcript may be more sensitive to IM (de Lemos et al. Genet Mol Res 2005), while two larger studies suggested that patients with b3a2 transcript may have better responses to IM (Vega-Ruiz et al. ASH 2007; Lucas et al. Haematologica 2009). No systematic evaluations in the context of large prospective clinical trials have been performed. AIM: To investigate the influence of the type of BCR-ABL fusion transcript on the responses and the outcome of CML patients treated with IM in ECP. Methods: We performed an analysis of 3 concurrent clinical trials of the GIMEMA CML Working Party (Clin Trials Gov. NCT00514488, NCT00510926 and the observational trial CML/023). Response monitoring was based on conventional cytogenetic examination (bone marrow) and quantitative molecular (Q-PCR) evaluation (peripheral blood). Definitions: Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCgR): 0% Ph+; Major Molecular Response (MMR): BCR-ABL/ABL ratio <0.1% (International Scale); failures: according to the revised European LeukemiaNet criteria (Baccarani et al. J Clin Oncol 2009). Results: 559 consecutive CML patients in early CP have been enrolled from January, 2004 to January, 2007. Patients expressing rare transcript types (e1a2 and e19a2) and patients with the presence of both b2a2 and b3a2 transcripts were excluded: 493 out of 559 patients were evaluable, 203 (41%) with a b2a2 transcript and 290 with a b3a2 transcript (59%). The 2 groups were comparable (no significant difference in sex, age, Sokal and Hasford scores, clonal chromosomal abnormalities in Ph+ cells before IM and imatinib dose). The median observation time is currently 60 (extremes 2–80) months. In patients with b2a2 and b3a2 transcript, the observed 12-months CCgR rates were 77% and 80%, respectively; the cumulative incidence of CCgR was 89% and 88%, respectively (no significant differences). The time to MMR was significantly shorter for patients with b3a2 transcript (fig.1), but the cumulative incidence of MMR was not significantly different (81% and 86% in patients with b2a2 and b3a2 transcript, respectively). The probabilities of Failure-Free Survival, Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival were 69% and 75%, 83% and 89%, 87% and 92% in patients with b2a2 and b3a2 transcript, respectively (fig. 1); no difference was statistically significant. Conclusions: In our experience, based on 493 early CP CML patients treated frontline with IM, the type of BCR-ABL fusion transcript had no relevant prognostic impact and no outcome differences have been observed so far. Acknowledgments: Work supported by European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, University of Bologna and BolognAIL. Disclosures: Castagnetti: Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Gugliotta:Novartis: Honoraria. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Wyeth: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Prospective Metabolic and Cardiovascular Assessment in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Nilotinib 300 Mg Bid Frontline in the Gimema 0811 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4046.4046 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4046-4046

Author(s):

Massimo Breccia ◽

Fausto Castagnetti ◽

Gabriele Gugliotta ◽

Bruno Martino ◽

Giuseppe Rossi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Metabolic Changes ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cardiovascular Assessment ◽

Frontline Treatment ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background. Nilotinib 300 mg BID was approved as frontline treatment in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients and allowed to reach deep molecular responses in a shorter median time with reduction of progression rate. Nilotinib is associated to a specific safety profile, with metabolic side effect as the most common events and increased probability of cardiovascular disorders. Aim. Aim of our study is to prospectively assess metabolic changes and cardiovascular safety during treatment with nilotinib, in a single arm multicentric Italian GIMEMA trial (0811), testing the drug as frontline treatment with the primary endpoint to obtain MR4 at 24 months. All metabolic changes were classified according to CTC grade. Lipidic changes were assessed according to American Association of Clinical endocrinologist criteria of 2012 and glucose abnormalities according to American diabetologist association (ADA). Results. One hundred and thirty patients were enrolled in 33 different centers: median age 50.5 years (range 18-85), 64.6% male. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.3, with 40% of patients being overweight/obese according to WHO classification. At last contact, 100 patients were still in treatment, the majority with full dose (86%). According to ADA criteria 47%, 10%, 4.6% and 6% of patients experienced grade 1 (101-125 mg/dl), grade 2 (126-150 mg/dl), grade 3 (151-200 mg/dl) and grade 4 (>200 mg/dl), increased fasting glucose, respectively. As compared to baseline, a significant variation was observed after 1 year (p<0.001). Glycosylated haemoglobin increased in 47% as grade 1 (5.7-6.49%), 10% as grade 2 (6.5-6.99%), 3% as grade 3 (7-7.99) and 4.6% as grade 4 (>8), respectively according to ADA criteria. AACE criteria identified a significant reduction of triglycerides (p<0.001) and a significant increase of cholesterol both in LDL and HDL fractions (p<0.001). Five patients (3.8%) experienced a peripheral arterial disorders (2 patients with claudication, 2 stenosis and 1 patient with arterial optic ischaemic): one patient required temporary reduction and 1 patient permanent discontinuation. Four patients experienced a venous thrombosis. Six patients (4.6%) had an ischemic cardiac disease and 7 patients (5.3%) an arrhythmia: five patients, based on physician judgment discontinued the treatment. Conclusions. Prospective monitoring of metabolic safety during frontline treatment with nilotinib 300 mg BID showed consistent and specific profile with increased glycaemia and cholesterol level, mostly of grade 1-2. Possible occurrences of cardiovascular side effects impose identification of patients at risk at baseline and a correct monitoring during follow-up. Disclosures Castagnetti: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gugliotta:BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Tiribelli:Novartis Farma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Saglio:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria. Baccarani:PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Rosti:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text