scholarly journals Generic Versus Branded Imatinib As Frontline Therapy in Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Italy: A Case-Control Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5909-5909
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Bonifacio ◽  
Mario Tiribelli ◽  
Gianni Binotto ◽  
Maria Cristina Miggiano ◽  
Marco Basso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
Sokal Score

Introduction. Imatinib is the most commonly used frontline drug in chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients worldwide. In early 2017 a generic formulation of imatinib was introduced in Italy and uniformly replaced branded imatinib (Glivec®), upon requirement of regional health authorities. In the last years various groups reported on the efficacy and safety of generic imatinib with conflicting results, partly related to substandard pharmaceutical quality of some products used in developing countries. In a multicenter cohort of 294 patients treated in Italy with branded imatinib for at least 6 months and then switched to generic imatinib we observed that the majority of patients maintained or improved their molecular response. Here, we analyzed patients who received generic imatinib since diagnosis. Aims. To analyze the rates of molecular responses at 3, 6 and 12 months and of treatment discontinuation in CML patients treated frontline with generic imatinib, compared to a case-matched historical cohort of CML patients who received frontline branded imatinib at our institutions. Methods. We analyzed 31 newly diagnosed CP-CML patients consecutively enrolled in a prospective observational registry between January 2017 and July 2018, treated frontline with generic imatinib 400 mg/day (diverse manufacturers) and evaluable for all the ELN2013 molecular milestones (if not discontinued earlier). They were compared to a retrospective cohort of 31 patients, matched for age, gender, and Sokal risk, diagnosed between 2007 and 2014 and treated with branded imatinib 400 mg/day for at least 24 months before eventual switching to a generic formulation. Definitions of molecular responses were made according to the ELN2013 recommendations. Results. A total of 62 patients were included in the analysis: 31 patients (21 males and 10 females) treated with generic imatinib ("cases") and 31 treated with branded imatinib ("controls"). Median age at diagnosis of the cases was 68 years (range 33-89), Sokal score was low/intermediate/high in 8 (26%), 19 (61%) and 4 (13%) patients, respectively. The controls were matched for gender, age (+/- 4 years, median age 68, range 35-85) and Sokal score. As median follow-up time for the cases was 18.6 months (range 2.2-28.5), controls were censored at 24 months after imatinib start. Optimal molecular response at 3 months was attained in 23/30 (76.7%) cases and in 18/29 (62%) controls (p=0.35); one case died after 2 months of imatinib therapy for a CML-unrelated cause, while 2 controls were molecularly not evaluable. At 6 months, 17/29 (58.6%) cases and 17/30 (56.7%) controls achieved BCR/ABL transcript <1%, respectively (p=1). At 12 months, MMR was attained by 14/30 (46.7%) cases and by 13/29 (44.8%) controls (p=1). Twelve out of 31 patients (38.7%) permanently discontinued generic imatinib due to warning/failure response (n=6), intolerance (n=4) or death while on treatment at 2 and 13 months (meningoencephalitis of unknown origin and cardiovascular event, respectively). Among patients treated with branded imatinib, 12/31 (38.7%) stopped within the 24th month of therapy for resistance (n=8), intolerance (n=3) or death at 16 months (acute renal failure). No patient receiving generic imatinib progressed to advanced phase, while one control developed a blast crisis at 6 months of branded imatinib and deceased shortly after. Estimated overall survival at 24 months in cases and controls was 92.5% and 93.1%, respectively. Conclusions. Our preliminary data suggest an equivalent efficacy of generic imatinib compared to a matched population of historical patients treated with the originator drug in Italy. A continue pharmacovigilance by reporting efficacy and safety outcomes of generic drugs is needed to ensure an optimal management of CML patients. Disclosures Bonifacio: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Tiribelli:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Krampera:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Interim Analysis of a Pan European Stop Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Trial in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia : The EURO-SKI study

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 151-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francois-Xavier Mahon ◽  
Johan Richter ◽  
Joelle Guilhot ◽  
Martin C Muller ◽  
Christian Dietz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Tki Treatment

Abstract Background: The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically changed the natural history of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) leading to significant improvement in clinical outcome and survival rates. The option of treatment cessation has recently become of utmost importance. Indeed, prospective trials suggest that imatinib therapy may be safely and successfully discontinued in CML pts with deep and sustained molecular responses (Mahon Lancet Oncol 2010, Ross Blood 2013). The major aim of the EURO-SKI study (European Leukemia Net Stop TKI study) was to define prognostic markers to increase the rate of patients in durable deep MR after stopping TKI. Further aims were the evaluation of harmonized methods of molecular monitoring, assessment of quality of life, and calculation of saved treatment costs per country. Methods: Adult CML patients in chronic phase CML on TKI treatment in confirmed deep molecular response (MR4, BCR-ABL <0.01%) for at least one year (>4 log reduction on TKI therapy for >12 months confirmed by three consecutive PCR tests) and under TKI treatment for at least 3 years were eligible. MR4confirmation was performed in a standardized laboratory (n=6). Primary endpoint was the assessment of the duration of MR (defined by continuous MMR) after stopping TKI. Patients (pts) after a prior TKI failure were excluded. According to protocol, an interim analysis was planned after 200 patients with eligible molecular results at month (mo) 6 were available to test the null hypothesis that relapse-free survival at 6 mo is less or equal 40%. Results: From June 2012 to June 2014, 498 CML pts in chronic phase from 10 countries were enrolled and included in the trial. From June 2012 to July 2013, 254 pts from 8 countries were registered; 54 were excluded (consent withdrawal n=1, protocol violation n=1, not eligible n=34, restart of TKI without relapse n=4, atypical or unknown transcript n=6, missing data n=8). Of the eligible 200 pts, 41.5% were female. Median age at diagnosis was 53.3 years (range, 13.8 to 85.5). In assessable pts 8.7% and 18.2 % were high-risk according to EUTOS and Sokal Scores. 103 pts were treated prior to the start TKI therapy, mostly with hydroxyurea or interferon. 1st-line TKI was imatinib in 97%, dasatinib in 1.5%, and nilotinib in 1.5% of pts. Twenty-four pts switched to second-line TKI therapy due to intolerance, 16 to dasatinib, 2 to imatinib, and 6 to nilotinib. The median time from diagnosis of CML to TKI cessation was 8 years (range, 3-19 years). TKI treatment duration was less than 5 years in 16%, 5-8 years in 36% and > 8 years in 48% of pts. Median duration of TKI treatment was 8 years (range, 3-12.6 years) and median duration of MR4 before TKI cessation was 5.4 years (range, 1-11.7 years). MR4duration was less than 2 years in 8%, 2-5 years in 37%, 5-8 years in 39% and >8 years in 16% of pts. For all eligible pts, a standardized European laboratory confirmed MR4 assessment. Since 123 of the 200 pts (61.5%, 95% CI: [54.4%; 68.3%]) remained without relapse the first 6 mo, the null hypothesis could be discarded (p<0.0001). Recurrence of CML, defined as loss of MMR, was observed in 43/92 pts (47%) treated <8 years, as compared to 23/87 pts (26%) treated for >8 years (p= 0.005). So far, there was a trend for prognostic significance of MR4 duration: 33/71 pts with MR4 <5 years (46%) lost MMR within 6 mo as compared to 28/87 pts (32%) with MR4duration >5 years (p=0.07). No significant difference was observed for relapse within 6 mo according to depth of molecular response at discontinuation (MR4 vs MR4.5 vs MR5). TKI cessation was a safe procedure but a substantial proportion of pts reported transitory musculoskeletal pain starting within weeks after imatinib discontinuation. The phenomenon was described in 30% of Swedish patients as a “TKI withdrawal syndrome” (Richter JCO 2014). Taking into account the cost of imatinib in Europe and time without treatment in the total study population at the most recent analysis, total savings for the community within the EURO-SKI trial were estimated at 7 million Euros. Conclusion: Employing a standardized molecular testing for patient selection within a TKI cessation trial in CML the chance to stay in treatment-free remission could be higher than previously reported. The EURO-SKI trial will further elucidate the prognostic factors but the preliminary results confirm (as reported in the STIM Study) the prognostic impact of the duration of TKI therapy before stopping. Disclosures Mahon: NOVARTIS PHARMA: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria; PFIZER: Honoraria. Porkka:BMS: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hjorth-Hansen:Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-myers Squibb: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Mayer:Janssen Research & Development: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Almeida:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyer Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Berger:Genzyme/Sanofi and Shire: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Mustjoki:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hochhaus:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Saussele:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel, Travel Other; Pfizer: Honoraria, Travel, Travel Other.

Long Term Adherence to Imatinib Therapy Is the Critical Factor for Achieving Molecular Responses in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3290-3290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Bazeos ◽  
Jamshid Khorashad ◽  
François-Xavier Mahon ◽  
Lina L Eliasson ◽  
Dragana Milojkovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Adherence Rate ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
Adherence To Therapy

Abstract Abstract 3290 Poster Board III-1 There is a great variability in the degree of molecular responses achieved by chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with imatinib. These different levels of molecular response could reflect different degrees of adherence to therapy. We measured the adherence to imatinib therapy in 87 consecutive CML chronic phase patients who had received imatinib 400 mg day as first line therapy for a median of 59.7 months before enrolment (range 25–104) and therefore all them were in complete cytogenetic response. Adherence levels were monitored during a 3-month period using microelectronic monitoring devices (MEMS) and were related to levels of molecular response. MEMS consist of an electronic device fitted in the cap of a normal looking medication bottle that automatically records each time the bottle is opened. MEMS are considered as the ‘gold standard' for measuring adherence. We also measured the imatinib plasma level, the presence of TKD mutations and the following prognostic factors measured at diagnosis: hOCT1 transcripts level, polymorphism 1236C&gt;T in ABCB1, Sokal risk group, hemoglobin, leukocytes , BCR-ABL1 transcript type and BCR1-ABL1 ratio and demographic data. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee and patients gave written informed consent to participate. The median adherence rate was 97.6% (range 22.6–103.8%). In 23 (26.4%) patients adherence was ≤90% (median 76%) and in 12 (13.8%) ≤80% (median 63%). We found a strong association between adherence rate (≤90% or &gt;90%) and the 6-year probability of major molecular response (MMR) (28.4% vs 94.5%, p&lt;0.0001) and complete molecular response (CMR) (0% vs 43.8%, p=0.002) (Fig 1). Multivariate analysis identified adherence (RR=11.7, p=0.001) and expression of the molecular transporter hOCT1, (RR=1.79, p=0.038) as the only independent predictors for MMR. Adherence was the sole independent predictor for CMR. No molecular responses were observed when the adherence was ≤20% (p=0.0001). In patients whose imatinib dose had been increased (n=32) the adherence was poor (median 86.4%). Adherence was the only independent predictor for failure to achieve a 3-log transcript reduction (RR=17.66, p=0.006) in this subgroup of patients. Patients with CML vary greatly in their response, as demonstrated originally by Sokal et al. in 1984, and the same variation is seen in patients treated with imatinib in the modern era. The basis for this variation is unknown but it has been attributed to the intrinsic biological heterogeneity of the leukemia. In contrast we show here that adherence to therapy is the major factor determining the degree of response that a CML patient treated with imatinib will achieve. Disclosures: Mahon: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Apperley:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rezvani:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Marin:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Of Dasatinib For Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase In Japan

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1493-1493
Author(s):  
Kohei Yamaguchi ◽  
Kazunori Murai ◽  
Shigeki Ito ◽  
Tomoaki Akagi ◽  
Kazuei Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Once Daily

Abstract Background Dasatinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitor that has a 325-fold higher potency than imatinib and a 16-fold higher potency than nilotinib in vitro. The previous report from the global DASISION trial showed dasatinib resulted in significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) compared with imatinib. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in Japan. Methods Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were include in this study. Patients received dasatinib 100mg once daily. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months. MMR defined as a BCR-ABL transcript level of 0.1% or lower on the International scale by means of a real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in peripheral blood. Secondary end points were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) by 12 months, the rate of MR4.5 (either (i) detectable disease with <0.0032% BCR-ABL1 IS or (ii) undetectable disease in cDNA with >32,000 ABL1 transcripts in the same volume of cDNA used to test for BCR-ABL1) by 12 months and adverse events of dasatinib (UMIN #000006358). Results Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were included in this study. All except one patient administered dasatinib 100 mg once daily. One patient was withdrawal before administration of dasatinib. So far, there were 71 patients with 6 months follow-up and 51 patients with 12 months follow-up. The estimated MMR rates were 69.5 % (95%CI, 58.7-80.3 %) by 6 months and 82.7% (95%CI, 73.0-92.4 %) by 12 months. The estimated MR4.5 rates were 27.1 % (95%CI, 16.7-37.5 %) by 6 months and 48.9% (95%CI, 36.0-61.7 %) by 12 months. Only 6 patients were withdrawal because of adverse event (5 patients) and ineffectiveness (1 patient). Conclusion Dasatinib treatment results in higher rates of molecular responses in newly diagnosed CML-CP patients in Japan. Dasatinib as the first-line agent might be acceptable for CML-CP patients because of better clinical efficacy and less toxicity. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Pegylated Interferon-Alpha 2a in Combination with Nilotinib As First-Line Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (Nilopeg trial). Four-Year Follow-up Results

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1578-1578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck E. Nicolini ◽  
Gabriel Etienne ◽  
Viviane Dubruille ◽  
Lydia Roy ◽  
Françoise Huguet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Pegylated Interferon ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
Log Reduction

Abstract Background & aims In the Nilopeg trial (EudraCT 2010-019786-28), we have previously demonstrated that the combination of nilotinib (Tasigna® Novartis), a second generation inihibitor (TKI2), combined to pegylated interferon-alpha 2a (Peg-IFN, Pegasys®, Roche) in de novo chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients is able to induce high rates of molecular responses with an acceptable additional toxicity (F. E. Nicolini et al. Lancet Haematology 2015) within 24 months of follow-up. We report here the ≥4-year follow-up of such patients for toxicity and efficacy. Methods In a phase 2 study, newly diagnosed CP-CML patients were assigned to a priming strategy by Peg-IFN (± HU) for a month at 90 mg/wk, prior to a combination of nilotinib 300 mg BID + Peg-IFN 45 micro.g/wk for ≥ 1 year, maximum 2 years. After 2 years nilotinib was continued alone. The primary endpoint was the rate of confirmed molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) by 1 year. Molecular assessments were centralised for all patients and expressed as BCR-ABLIS in % for 2 years and then performed in each center [all expressed in % on the international scale (IS)]. All data presented here are in intention-to-treat. Events were defined as death, progression to AP or BC, failure on nilotinib or nilotinib treatment discontinuation for any cause excluding treatment-free remission (TFR). Results Fourty-two patients were enrolled in this trial (one withdrawn its consent prior to treatment initiation), and the median follow-up is now 50.7 (47.8-52.8) months. Sokal and Euro scores were high for 12% and 2%, intermediate for 49% and 55% and low for 39% and 43% of the patients respectively. The median age at treatment initiation was 53 (23-85) years, 2 patients had a masked Philadelphia chromosome, 3 a variant form, and 1 additional chromosomal abnormalities, all patients had "major" BCR-ABL1 transcripts. The rates of Complete Cytogenetic Responses (CCyR) at "6", and "12" months of combination (i. e. at 5 and 11 months of TKI2) were 71%, and 100% respectively. Eighty seven percent of patients had a BCR-ABLIS ≤10% at M3 (i. e. after 2 months TKI). The rates of molecular responses respectively at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months were 76%, 78%, 83%, 73% for MMR, 51%, 58.5%, 66%, 58.5% for 4 log reduction (MR4), 17%, 34%, 34%, 44% for 4.5 log reduction (MR4.5), 12%, 32%, 29%, 41.5% for ≥5 log reduction (MR5), shown as cumulative incidence curves for MR4.5 in figure 1. The median doses of Peg-IFN delivered to the patients during the first year were 45 (0-45) micro.g/wk, and for nilotinib 600 (300-600) mg daily. Interestingly, logistic regression analysis adjusted on MR4.5 responses showed a significant relationship with the mean doses of Peg-IFN delivered to the patients at 12 months (p=0.003, OR = 1.09 [1.03-1.16]), 24 months (p=0.005, OR = 1.08 [1.02-1.14]) and 48 months (p=0.024, OR = 1.09 [1.01-1.17], but not with the mean doses of nilotinib [p=0.84, OR = 0.99 [0.99-1.01], p=0.087, OR = 1 [0.99-1.01], and p=0.88, OR = 1 [0.99-1.01] respectively. Eight patients (19.5%) were in TFR for a median of 6.8 (0.5-9.5) months after 2-year consecutive MR4.5, and none lost MMR yet at last follow-up. One patient died of progression (unmutated myeloid blast crisis at M6, who relapsed after unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation). There was no additional grade 3-4 hematologic or biochemical toxicities occurring after 24 months. At last follow-up 10 patients switched for another TKI (2 for dasatinib, 5 for imatinib, and 3 for imatinib followed by dasatinib), for unsufficient cytogenetic or molecular response (2 patients) or for toxicity (7 patients). Overall, 4 patients presented some cardio-vascular events 3 coronary stenoses, one brain stroke). Conclusion Despite additional initial toxicities Peg-IFN priming strategy, followed by the combination of nilotinib and Peg-IFN during the first year induces very high rates of durable deep molecular responses (MR4 and MR4.5) at later time-points, offering TFR for number of patients. To date, no emerging severe adverse events occurred. However, to confirm these promising results, a randomised phase III study testing nilotinib versus nilotinib + Peg-IFN is absolutely warranted and in progress. Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of MR4.5 Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of MR4.5 Disclosures Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Etienne:ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Congress Travel/Accomodations, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Roy:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Huguet:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Legros:ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Giraudier:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Coiteux:BMS: Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Guerci-Bresler:ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Amé:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Cony-Makhoul:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gardembas:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Hermet:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Rousselot:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Mahon:ARIAD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Velocity of Early BCR-ABL Transcript Elimination As an Optimized Predictor of Deep Molecular Response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Chronic Phase on Treatment with Dasatinib

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4052-4052
Author(s):  
Kazunori Murai ◽  
Kohei Yamaguchi ◽  
Shigeki Ito ◽  
Tomoaki Akagi ◽  
Kazuei Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Similar Data ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Deep Molecular Response

Abstract Background: We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in Japan (IMIDAS PART2 study; UMIN000006358). Several groups reported that some of CML patients who achieved stable deep molecular response (DMR) level or deeper could stop Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) and approximately 40% of these patients could keep therapy free survival by cessation of TKI. Discontinuation of TKI has emerged as a new goal of treatment in CML. Achievement of DMR is necessary for discontinuation of TKI. The aim of the present study was to analyze the prognostic significance of (i) BCR-ABL transcript International Scale (BCR-ABL IS) levels, (ii) the halving time and (iii) velocity of BCR-ABL transcript elimination using an optimized cutoff according to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Methods: Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were included in this study. Patients received dasatinib 100mg once daily. Treatment has continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Clinical efficacy and safety was partially reported in 55th ASH Meeting. We sought to investigate the impacts of above 3 parameters within the initial 1 or 3 months of therapy. Halving time was calculated by the method, described by Branford et al. Velocity of BCR-ABL transcript elimination at 1 or 3 months (V-BCR-ABL1m or 3m respectively) was calculated as BCR-ABL IS at 1 or 3 months (BCR-ABL IS1m or 3m respectively) divided by that at diagnosis. Results: One patient was withdrawal before administration of dasatinib. Seventy-nine patients administered dasatinib 100 mg once daily. The estimated MMR and DMR rates were 92.1 % (95%CI, 76.8-97.3 %) and 60.9% (95%CI; 42.3-73.4 %) by 12 months respectively. The patients who had already achieved DMR at 3 months were excluded from landmark analysis. The cut off values for prediction of DMR at 12 months were obtained by ROC analysis. Those of BCR-ABL IS1m and BCR-ABL IS3m were 11.7% and 0.284% respectively. Those of halving times on 0-1 month and 0-3months (halving time1m and 3m) were 17.8 and 13.6 days respectively. Those of V-BCR-ABL1m and V-BCR-ABL3m were 0.321 and 0.018 respectively. The estimated DMR at 12 months, 95% CI and probability (P), obtained by Kaplan-Myer analysis, were shown in Figure 1. Odd' ratio, obtained by Chi-square test, was shown in Table 1. The patients with less than 0.321 at V-BCR-ABL1m showed the highest DMR at 12 months (80%), the least probability (P=0.009) and the least odd' ratio (0.175). At 3 months, there were similar data in these parameters among BCR-ABL IS3m, halving time3m and V-BCR-ABL3m. Figure 1 showed the cumulative DMR rate according to the cutoff values in V-BCR-ABL1m and V-BCR-ABL3m. V-BCR-ABL1m 0.321 and V-BCR-ABL3m 0.018 separated best. Conclusion: These data strongly suggested that V-BCR-ABL1m,3m would be a significant landmark to predict DMR at 12 months as well as BCR-ABL IS1m,3m, halving time1m,3m. Among them, less than 0.321 in V-BCR-ABL1m was identified as an optimized predictive cutoff value of DMR at 12 months. Disclosures Ishida: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria.

scholarly journals The Comparison of Dasatinib 70 Mg/Day to 100 Mg/Day in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3615-3615
Author(s):  
Dan Yu ◽  
Zhuangzhi Yang ◽  
Hui Cheng ◽  
Rui Jiang ◽  
Jingming Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with frontline dasatinib 70 mg/day with those who received standard-dose dasatinib 100 mg/day. Method: From July 2019 to July 2021, 81 patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP were enrolled across 11 centers. All of the patients were randomly treated with dasatinib 70 mg/day (N=43) or standard-dose dasatinib 100 mg/day (N=38). Results: Among 81 enrolled patients, 16 patients were off study at different times for different reasons.All patients achieved hematological remission after 3 months of treatment, and the best response rates were 84.00% (21/25) and 88.89% (24/27) for 70mg/d and 100mg/d groups (P&gt;0.05).At 6 months, the best response, complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) rate were 94.44% vs 92.86% (P &gt; 0.05), 94.44% vs 92.86% (P &gt; 0.05) and 55.56% vs 71.43% (P &gt; 0.05), respectively.At 9 months, the rates of CCyR and MMR were 90.91% vs 88.89% (P &gt; 0.05) and 66.67% vs 72.73% (P &gt; 0.05);CCyR and MMR by 12 months, respectively, were 90.91% vs 100.00% (P &gt; 0.05), 81.82% vs 80.00% (P &gt; 0.05).The adverse events (AEs) of the two groups were mild, and there was no significant difference (P &gt; 0.05).The most common grade ≥3 hematological AEs in 70 mg/d group were leukopenia (1/43), neutropenia (1/43) and anemia (2/43), and In 100mg/d group were leukopenia (4/38), neutropenia (6/38), anemia (3/38) and thrombocytopenia (3/38). Conclusions: Our study suggests that patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP treated with dasatinib 70 mg/day or 100 mg/day, there is no significant difference in efficacy and safety. Decreasing the dose of dasatinib can ensure the efficacy of patients, while reducing the economic burden of patients and increasing patient compliance. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of Bosutinib in Patient with Chronic myeloid leukemia who was intolerant to DASTANIB,NILOTUNIB -Case report

2021 ◽  
pp. 225
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Toxicity Profile ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Major Molecular Response

Treatment for Chronic myeloid leukemia has been revolutionized because of availability of different tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Each TKI come with its on toxicity profile as this needs to be taken in account before starting therapy with particular agent in a patient. Most of the adverse effects related to TKI are mild and can be managed by either symptomatic treatment or either by dose reduction. But some patients can become intolerant and to switch to other TKI remains the only option. Bosutinib is currently approved for treatment of chronic phase CML in patients who are either resistant or intolerant to previous TKI. We present a case of 59 year old male patient with CML who was intolerant to Dastanib and Nilotinib but showed excellent hematological and major molecular response to bosutinib

Real World Efficacy Evaluation of Branded and Copy Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Multicentric Study from Argentina

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 36-37
Author(s):  
Ana Ines Varela ◽  
Georgina Bendek ◽  
Carolina Pavlovsky ◽  
Maria Josefina Freitas ◽  
Veronica Ventriglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Sokal Score

Background: Data on the safety and efficacy of copy drugs is usually unavailable. Imatinib mesylate is used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in Argentina since 2002. During the last decade more than ten different imatinib copies are marketed by the different health-care systems in the country, usually for cost issues. In spite of the undoubted benefit of this tyrosine-kinase inhibitor indication in CML, there is no solid evidence that supports copy drug equivalent outcomes for this patient population. Aim: To compare the clinical presentation, treatment response and outcome of a chronic phase (CP) CML patient cohort treated with branded and copy imatinib in the real-life setting. Methods: Multicentric, retrospective trial based on data obtained from medical charts of adult CP CML patients treated with imatinib in 9 centers in Argentina from 2002 to 2020.We analyzed demographic characteristics and clinical characteristics described for branded and copy imatinib treated cohorts. Frequency of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 12 months, Major molecular response or better(≥MMR) at 12, 18 and 24 months and overall MR4.0, MR4.5 and deep molecular response (MR4.0 +MR4.5 IS) were analyzed. Event was defined as failure, progression or CML related death. Kaplan Meier comparison of event free, progression free and overall survival. Statistics: IBM SPSS version 1. Results: A total of 568 CP CML adult patients (pt) treated with imatinib were included. Mean age at diagnosis: 45.7 years (range 18 - 85). Male 55.6% (316/568). Sokal Score was recorded in 471 pt: 57% (269/471) low, 26% (122/471) intermediate and 17% (80/471) high-risk. Median follow-up 107 months (RIQ: 36-149). Branded imatinib treatment 330 (58%) and imatinib copies 238 (42%). For branded and copy imatinib cohorts mean age 46,1 (18-85) and 45.3(18-80), male 53% (175/330) and 59% (141/238), median follow up 102 (RIQ 101-130) and 61 (RIQ 62-146) respectively. Sokal score low 58% (164/284) and 56% (105/187), intermediate 27% (77/284) and 24% (45/187) and high 15% (43/284) and19% (37/187). Frequency of CCyR at 12 months 71% (67/94) and 69% (41/59), ≥MMR at 12 months 57% (79/138) and 43% (39/89), ≥MMR 18m 66 % (61/92) and 71% (43/60), ≥MMR 24m 65% (96/147) and 79% (58/73). Overall MR4, MR 4.5 and Deep MR with branded imatinib 62.4% (186/298), 42% (118/276) and 63% (189/300), compared to 45(97/214), 24% (50/207) and 46% (99/215) with copies. Difference in evaluation throughout the treatment periods with loss of data did not allow response rate statistical comparison in predetermined timepoints. Kaplan Meier Event free survival median 229 months vs 75 months p 0.001, Progression free survival mean 318 months vs 208 pt 0.034 and Overall Survival mean 275 months vs 206 months for branded and copy imatinib respectively. Discussion: Several case reports have shown poor outcomes in patients treated with imatinib copy drugs, including loss of responses previously attained with branded imatinib. This study reports data from a large cohort of CP CML patients treated in daily practice during a long period of time. Treatment results at determined timepoints is comparable. Although management and treatment decisions were performed in different time periods, results show different outcomes in EFS and PFS between patients treated with branded vs copy imatinib. Overall survival in both cohorts is comparable. As studies assesing the safety and efficacy of the copy drugs compared with branded imatinib will hardly be performed this evidence calls for careful attention and strict follow up measures when managing CML patients with copy imatinib. Figure Disclosures Varela: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Pavlovsky:Pint Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Freitas:Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board. Pavlovsky:Varifarma: Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau. Moiraghi:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau.

Survey of the Frontline Treatment and Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in a Real-Word Setting: The 3rd Annual Update of the Worldwide Observational Registry Collecting Longitudinal Data on Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients (The WORLD CML Registry)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1695-1695
Author(s):  
Ricardo Pasquini ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
David Joske ◽  
Luis A Meillon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Molecular Monitoring ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 1695 Background: A global, prospective registry was established to document the frequency of diagnostic testing, management (mgmt) strategies, and outcomes of patients (pts) with CML. Here, we summarize the reported deviations from published disease mgmt recommendations and the overall efficacy achieved by pts. Methods: 1853 pts (≥ 16 years of age) within 6 months (mo) + 2 weeks of CML diagnosis were enrolled from Latin America (LA; n = 497), United States (US; n = 379), Asia Pacific (AP; n = 465), Middle East and Africa (MEA; n = 209), and Russia and Turkey (RT; n = 303). Baseline demographics and medical history were collected at enrollment; current disease status and mgmt information were collected at approximately 6-mo intervals or with a change in disease status or mgmt. Results: From February 2008 to June 2011, data were available for 1831 (99%) pts. Across all regions, nearly all (93.8%) screened pts were in chronic phase CML. Regardless of the time of evaluation (eval), disease burden was mostly assessed through the use of hematologic counts (Table 1). Cytogenetic testing and molecular monitoring were used in a minority of pts at any timepoint. Hydroxyurea (HU) and imatinib were the first agents used in 61.9% and 29.5% of pts, respectively (Table 2). Overall, 81.1% of pts received imatinib therapy at some time and it was the most common second agent (48.1%) pts received. Among the 49% of pts who had response assessments, subsequent treatment changes occurred most frequently (23.9% of pts) at the 3-mo timepoint (Table 1). The median time from disease eval to dose/regimen modification was 3 days. Of those who received imatinib, 32% had dose modifications primarily for: lack of efficacy (20%), physician request (20%), and adverse events (19%). Of the pts with a corresponding eval at 12 mo after diagnosis, 88% had a CHR, 65.4% had a CCyR, and 42.5% had a MMR (BCR-ABLIS ≤.1%). These data are preliminary; response assessments by treatment, as well as further efficacy analyses, are ongoing. Conclusions: Overall, the majority of pts did not have cytogenetic or BCR-ABL transcript level testing performed per the European LeukemiaNet recommendations. Furthermore, despite availability of more effective therapies for the treatment of CML, HU is still used as a primary therapy in a substantial proportion of pts. Based on this analysis, pts outside the US primarily receive HU as initial therapy rather than tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Overall, second-generation TKIs, such as nilotinib and dasatinib, are infrequently used. These results illustrate the need for continuing education on the mgmt of CML in order to improve outcomes for all pts. Disclosures: Pasquini: Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Cortes:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuitcals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding. Zernovak:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sivarathinasami:Novartis: Employment. Collins:Novartis: Employment. Hughes:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document