scholarly journals Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Renal Impairment: Analysis of Patients from the Phase 3b Stratus Trial (MM-010)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4755-4755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Weisel ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
Enrique M. Ocio ◽  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Treatment (Tx) with novel agents, including lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT), has extended survival of patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM); however, pts who have relapsed on or become refractory to Tx have significantly shortened overall survival (OS) and poorer outcomes (Kumar, Leukemia, 2012). Renal impairment (RI) occurs frequently, in approximately 20% to 40% of MM pts (Kastritis, Haematologica, 2007), and is a leading cause of death in this pt population (Korbet, J Am Soc Nephrol, 2006). In the phase 3 MM-003 trial, pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (POM + LoDEX) significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS) and OS vs. high-dose dexamethasone in pts in whom BORT and LEN Tx failed, including those with moderate RI (creatinine clearance [CrCl] < 60 mL/min; Weisel, Blood, 2013). STRATUS is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, European, phase 3b trial to further evaluate safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in pts with refractory or relapsed and refractory MM (N = 456), including those with moderate RI. Methods: Pts must have had refractory or relapsed and refractory disease (progressive disease [PD] during or within 60 days of last line of Tx), at least 2 prior therapies, BORT and LEN failure after ≥ 2 cycles of each (alone or in combination), and adequate prior alkylator therapy as defined in study protocol. Pts must have been refractory to their last line of Tx; pts with CrCl < 45 mL/min were excluded. POM was administered 4 mg D1-21/28-day cycle and LoDEX 40 mg/day (20 mg for pts aged > 75 yrs) on D1, 8, 15, and 22 until PD or unacceptable toxicity. All pts received thromboprophylaxis with low-dose aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or equivalent based on clinical recommendations. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints included POM exposure, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. For this analysis, pts were retrospectively grouped by baseline CrCl (< 60 mL/min vs. ≥ 60 mL/min). Results: A total of 456 pts have been enrolled, of whom 452 received POM + LoDEX and 165 (36%) had moderate RI (CrCl < 60 mL/min). After a median follow-up of 6.8 mos, the most frequently reported grade (Gr) 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in pts with moderate RI vs. without moderate RI (CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min) were neutropenia (39% vs. 40%), anemia (33% vs. 24%), and thrombocytopenia (19% vs. 19%); the most common Gr 3-4 nonhematologic TEAEs were pneumonia (12% vs. 11%), fatigue (6% vs. 4%), and hypercalcemia (4% vs. 4%), respectively. Only 2% of pts in each respective renal subgroup discontinued POM due to Tx-related TEAEs. Gr 3-4 renal toxicities were similar in both subgroups: acute renal failure occurred in 3% of pts with moderate RI and 2% of pts without moderate RI; blood creatinine increased in 2% and 1% of pts, respectively. Overall, Gr 3-4 deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and peripheral neuropathy (PN) were infrequent independent of renal status (Table). Median relative POM dose intensity was similar between subgroups (0.95 in pts with moderate RI vs. 0.96 in pts without moderate RI). In pts with moderate RI vs. without moderate RI, ORR was 35% vs. 34%, median DOR was 5.8 mos vs. 6.5 mos, median PFS was 3.7 vs. 4.6 mos, and median OS was 9.3 vs. not reached, respectively (Table). The 1-yr OS was 33% for pts with moderate RI vs. 53% for pts without moderate RI. Conclusions: POM + LoDEX has acceptable safety and efficacy profiles comparable to those observed in the pivotal MM-003 trial. Tolerability was consistent across renal function subgroups, with few discontinuations due to adverse events. In addition, responses to POM + LoDEX were similar between pts, irrespective of renal function. POM is currently being prospectively evaluated in pts with severe RI in the MM-008 (US) and MM-013 (EU) trials. Table.With Moderate RICrCl < 60 mL/min (n = 162)Without Moderate RICrCl ≥ 60 mL/min(n = 290)Grade 3-4 TEAEs, %Neutropenia Anemia Thrombocytopenia Pneumonia39 33 19 1240 24 19 11Grade 3-4 EOI, %DVT/PE PN2 20 1Efficacy(n = 165)(n = 291)ORR (≥ PR), % (95% CI) Median DOR (95% CI), mos Median PFS (95% CI), mos Median OS (95% CI), mos35 (27.9-43.0) 5.8 (3.7-NE) 3.7 (2.9-5.2) 9.3 (6.3-11.5)34 (28.9-40.1) 6.5 (4.7-7.9) 4.6 (3.7-5.6) NR (10.9-NR) EOI, events of interest; NE, not estimable, NR, not reached. Disclosures Weisel: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Noxxon: Consultancy. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Ocio:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Palumbo:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Delforge:Celgene Corp: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Oriol:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Goldschmidt:Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Miller:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Peluso:Celgene: Employment. Sternas:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene : Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

MM-008: A Phase 1 Trial Evaluating Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability Of Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone In Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Renal Impairment

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5393-5393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Matous ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Hien K. Duong ◽  
Claudia Kasserra ◽  
Min Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Impaired Renal Function ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Pomalidomide (POM) is indicated for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma who have received at least 2 prior therapies, including lenalidomide and bortezomib, and have demonstrated disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last therapy. Renal impairment (RI) is a common comorbidity in multiple myeloma (MM), occurring in > 40% of pts. POM is extensively metabolized, with < 5% eliminated renally as the parent drug. Thus, renal function may not substantively affect exposure of the active parent compound. POM + low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) has shown efficacy in pts with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) with moderate RI in phase 2 and phase 3 trials. However, pts with severe RI were excluded from these trials. MM-008 is an active multicenter, open-label, phase 1 study designed to prospectively assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of POM + LoDEX in pts with RRMM and normal or severely impaired renal function. Methods Pts with RRMM and ≥ 1 prior therapy were eligible for enrollment. Pts in Cohort A (creatinine clearance [CrCL] ≥ 60 mL/min) served as the control population and received POM 4 mg on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. Pts in Cohort B (CrCL < 30 mL/min but not requiring dialysis) followed a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, receiving POM 2 mg on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle and based on results, escalating to 4 mg. Dosing for Cohort C (CrCL < 30 mL/min and requiring dialysis) was informed by the results from Cohort B. All cohorts received dexamethasone 40 mg (20 mg for pts aged > 75 years) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Pts were not permitted to enroll in more than 1 cohort. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for management of neutropenia was not permitted in cycle 1, but could be started on day 1 of the next cycle at the physician’s discretion. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (V 4.0). PK samples were obtained pre- and post-POM dose on days 1, 2, and 3 (after single doses) and days 21, 22, and 23 (after multiple doses) of cycle 1 for cohorts A and B. PK data were dose-normalized for comparison across cohorts by dividing the measured exposure by the POM dose in milligrams. Results As of April 1, 2013, 11 pts have been treated (8 in Cohort A; 3 in Cohort B at 2 mg). At screening, median age (range) was 68 years (46-71 years) and 64 years (57-64 years) while median CrCL (range) was 85 mL/min (53.1- 114.8 mL/min) and 18.4 mL/min (12.5-25.7 mL/min) in cohorts A and B, respectively. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (Cohort A: 4 pts; Cohort B: 1 pt), infections (Cohort A: 2 pts; Cohort B: 2 pts), and anemia (Cohort A: 2 pts; Cohort B: 1 pt). No dose-limiting toxicities in cycle 1 have been reported. Median duration of treatment and relative dose intensity were similar between cohorts A and B, 4.1 months (range, 1.8-5.1 months) vs 3.9 months (range, 1.8-8.5 months) and 1.0 (range, 0.5-1.1) and 1.1 (range, 1.0-1.1), respectively. Only 1 pt (Cohort A) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Five pts remain on study (Cohort A: 3 pts; Cohort B: 2 pts). Initial PK analyses showed that mean dose-normalized AUC024 in Cohort B was approximately 20% lower than in Cohort A. Mean dose-normalized Cmax in Cohort B was approximately 30% lower than that in Cohort A after a single dose but comparable after multiple doses. Based on these results, additional pts in Cohort B and pts in Cohort C will receive POM 4 mg. Updated PK and adverse event data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion MM-008 is an ongoing trial prospectively evaluating the PK and safety of POM + LoDEX in pts with severe RI. Preliminary data suggest that dose-normalized exposure in pts with RRMM with severe RI is similar to that in pts with normal to mildly impaired renal function. No dose-limiting toxicities have been reported, and early tolerability data are encouraging. Disclosures: Matous: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Approved in the US but not in Europe. Siegel:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Duong:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kasserra:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Doerr:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sternas:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jacques:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Outcomes for Older Patients in Stratus (MM-010), a Single-Arm, and Phase 3b Study of Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4770-4770
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Katja Weisel ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
Enrique M. Ocio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Survival of patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) decreases with increased age (Pulte, Oncologist, 2011). In addition, MM pts with advanced disease who have exhausted treatment (Tx) with novel agents have a poor prognosis (Kumar, Leukemia, 2012). Pomalidomide (POM) is a new oral agent with antimyeloma, stromal cell inhibitory, and immune modulatory effects (Quach, Leukemia, 2010; Mark, Leuk Res, 2014). In the pivotal MM-003 trial, POM in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits vs. high-dose dexamethasone, with a tolerable safety profile in refractory or relapsed and refractory MM (RRMM; Dimopoulos, Blood, 2013). In MM-003, significant PFS and OS benefits with POM + LoDEX Tx were seen in different age groups; tolerability and dose intensity were not affected by age (Weisel, Blood, 2013). STRATUS is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, European, phase 3b trial to further evaluate safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in a large pt population. This analysis examines outcomes by age (≤ 65 vs. > 65 yrs, and ≤ 70 vs. > 70 yrs). Methods: Eligible pts had refractory or relapsed and refractory disease (progressive disease [PD] during or within 60 days of last line of Tx), having previous BORT and LEN failure and adequate prior alkylator therapy as defined in study protocol. Pts must have been refractory to the last prior Tx line. Pts with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status > 2 were excluded. Pts received 28-day cycles of POM 4 mg D1-21 + DEX 40 mg (20 mg for pts aged > 75 yrs) once weekly. All pts received thromboprophylaxis with low-dose aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or equivalent based on clinical recommendations. Tx continued until PD or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety; the secondary endpoints included POM exposure, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Outcomes were analyzed by pt age at baseline (≤ 65 vs. > 65 yrs, and ≤ 70 vs. > 70 yrs). Results: As of March 17th, 2014, a total of 456 pts have been enrolled, and 452 had received POM + LoDEX; 48% were aged ≤ 65 yrs, 52% were > 65 yrs, 71% were ≤ 70 yrs, and 29% were > 70 yrs. Pts were heavily pretreated (median 4-5 prior Tx depending on age subgroup). Median follow-up was 6.8 mos. Younger pts (≤ 65 yrs) were more likely to have better renal function (creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min; 80%) than those aged > 65 (49%). Median relative dose intensity was similar independent of age (range, 0.95-0.97 mg/day). The most common grade (Gr) 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) across age groups were neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and pneumonia (Table). Gr 3-4 deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with prophylaxis was 1% in each subgroup. Discontinuations of POM due to TEAEs were low in pts aged ≤ 65 (0.9%), > 65 (3.0%), ≤ 70 (1.3%), and > 70 (3.8%) yrs. Outcomes by age are summarized in the Table. ORR was consistent for pts aged ≤ 65 (38%), > 65 (32%), ≤ 70 (35%), and > 70 (34%) yrs; DORs were 5.1, 6.8, and 5.8 mos and not estimable (NE) in these pt populations, respectively. Median PFS and median OS were similar across all age groups (PFS range, 4.0-4.9 mos, OS range, 10.6-11.5 mos). Conclusions: The data reported here further demonstrate the tolerability and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in pts with RRMM in the age subgroups analyzed (≤ 65 vs. > 65 yrs and ≤ 70 vs. > 70 yrs). Safety profiles were consistent, while dose intensity was similar across age groups. PFS, OS, and response rates were comparable with those previously reported in trials of POM + LoDEX in pts with RRMM and reinforce 4 mg POM as an appropriate starting dose irrespective of age. These data support POM + LoDEX as a standard Tx option for pts with refractory or RRMM regardless of age. Table 1. Age ≤ 65 yrs (n = 215) Age > 65 yrs (n = 237) Age ≤ 70 yrs (n = 319) Age > 70 yrs (n = 133) Grade 3-4 TEAEs, % Neutropenia Anemia Thrombocytopenia Pneumonia 38 30 22 13 41 24 16 10 38 29 21 11 44 23 15 11 Grade 3-4 EOI, % DVT/PE PN 1 <1 1 2 1 1 1 2 Efficacy (n = 218) (n = 238) (n = 322) (n = 134) ORR (≥ PR), % (95% CI) Median DOR (95% CI), mos Median PFS (95% CI), mos Median OS (95% CI), mos 38 (31-44) 5.1 (3.8-6.7) 4.1 (3.3-4.9) 10.9 (9.0-NE) 32 (26-38) 6.8 (4.7-11.5) 4.6 (3.6-5.6) 10.6 (9.3-NE) 35 (30-41) 5.8 (20.0-28.1) 4.0 (3.2-4.8) 10.9 (9.2-NE) 34 (26-42) NE (34.4-NE) 4.9 (3.7-6.7) 11.5 (8.5-NE) EOI: events of interest; NE: Not evaluable. Disclosures Palumbo: Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Weisel:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Noxxon: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Ocio:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Corradini:Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau. Delforge:Celgene Corp: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Oriol:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Goldschmidt:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Slaughter:Celgene: Employment. Simcock:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Herring:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Peluso:Celgene: Employment. Sternas:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

MM-008: A Phase 1 Trial Evaluating Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory and Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Renal Impairment

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4730-4730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Matous ◽  
David S Siegel ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
R. Donald Harvey ◽  
Claudia Kasserra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Creatinine Clearance ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Platelet Transfusion ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Pomalidomide (POM) is indicated for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who received ≥ 2 prior therapies including lenalidomide and bortezomib and demonstrated progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last treatment (Tx). Renal impairment (RI) is a common comorbidity of multiple myeloma (MM) occurring in 20% to 40% of pts (Eleutherakis-Papaikovou, et al. Leuk Lymphom, 2007; Knudsen, et al., Eur J Haematol, 2000). POM is extensively metabolized, with < 5% eliminated renally as the parent drug (Hoffmann, et al., Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2013). POM in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) has shown efficacy in pts with RRMM and moderate RI (creatinine clearance [CrCl] < 30-44 mL/min), but pts with severe RI (CrCl < 30 mL/min; serum creatinine> 3 mg/dL) were excluded from most trials (Siegel, et al., Blood. 2012; Weisel, et al., J Clin Oncol, 2013). MM-008 is a multicenter, open-label, phase 1 study assessing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of POM + LoDEX in pts with RRMM and normal or severely impaired renal function. Methods: Pts withRRMM (≥ 1 prior Tx) and normal kidney function or mild RI (creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥ 60 mL/min; Cohort A—control arm), severe RI (CrCl < 30 mL/min) not requiring dialysis (Cohort B), and severe RI requiring dialysis (Cohort C) were eligible. Cohort A received POM 4 mg, and Cohort B received POM 2 or 4 mg on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, following a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. Cohort B results informed the 4 mg dosing of Cohort C. All cohorts received DEX 40 mg (20 mg for pts aged > 75 yrs) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Tx continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as any of the following: grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, Gr 4 thrombocytopenia that is a ≥ 30% decrease in platelets from baseline and requires > 1 platelet transfusion, Gr 3 thrombocytopenia with significant bleeding (requiring hospitalization and/or platelet transfusion), Gr 4 infection, or ≥ Gr 3 other non-hematologic toxicity related to POM. Serial plasma samples were analyzed to generate PK parameters. Updated PK and AE data for all cohorts will be presented. Results: As of July 17, 2014, updated data for 16 treated pts were available (8 in Cohort A; 3 in Cohort B at 2 mg; 4 in Cohort B at 4 mg; and 1 in Cohort C). Median age was 67 yrs (range, 46-76 yrs), 56% were male, all had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and a median time from diagnosis of 3.8 yrs (range, 0.6-12.5). No DLTs in cycle 1 were reported for any cohort. The most common Gr ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia, anemia, infection, and fatigue (Table). Median relative dose intensity was consistent across cohorts: 90% (Cohort A), 90% (Cohort B; 2 mg), 100% (Cohort B; 4 mg) and 100% (Cohort C). Three pts discontinued due to AEs (2 in Cohort A and 1 in Cohort B 4 mg); no deaths have occurred during treatment phase. Conclusion: MM-008 is an ongoing trial prospectively evaluating the PK and safety of POM + LoDEX in pts with RRMM and severe RI. Preliminary PK data support mean dose-normalized exposure in pts with RRMM being similar between those with severe RI and those with no or mild RI at the clinical dose of 4 mg; early tolerability data (after one cycle) are encouraging. Table Cohort A(n = 8) Cohort B(n = 3) Cohort B(n = 4) Cohort C(n = 1) Cohort Characteristics POM dose 4 mg 2 mg 4 mg 4 mg CrCl (mL/min) ≥ 60 mL/min < 30 mL/min without dialysis < 30 mL/min without dialysis < 30 mL/min with dialysis Safety Dose-limiting toxicities (n) N/A 0 0 0 Grade 3/4 AEs (n) Neutropenia 4 2 1 0 Anemia 3 1 2 0 Infection 3 2 0 0 Fatigue 2 0 0 0 N/A: Not applicable (4 mg POM is approved dose for population) Disclosures Matous: Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Siegel:Celgene Corp: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Lonial:Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy. Harvey:Celgene Corp: Research Funding. Kasserra:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Celgene Corp: Employment. Doerr:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Sternas:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene : Employment, Equity Ownership. Jacques:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Celgene Corp: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Analysis of Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma with Vs without Moderate Renal Impairment

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3031-3031 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S Siegel ◽  
Katja C. Weisel ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Rachid Baz ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Introduction: Renal impairment (RI) occurs in ≈ 20% to 40% of patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM; Kastritis et al, Haematologica, 2007) and is a major comorbidity with this disease (Korbet et al, J Am Soc Nephrol, 2006). Pts with MM who relapse on or become refractory to treatment (Tx) experience shortened overall survival (OS; Kumar et al, Leukemia, 2012). Pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone (POM + LoDEX) is approved for the Tx of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) in pts who have had Tx failure with lenalidomide and/or bortezomib. POM + LoDEX demonstrated safety and efficacy in pts with RRMM (MM-010; Dimopoulos et al, EHA 2015) as well as extended progression-free survival (PFS) and OS vs high-dose dexamethasone (MM-003; San Miguel et al, Lancet Oncol, 2013) or POM alone (MM-002; Richardson et al, Blood, 2014). Each trial included pts with moderate RI, and this pooled analysis examines the safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in pts with moderate RI. Patients and Methods: Pts from MM-002, MM-003, and MM-010 who had received POM + LoDEX were grouped by RI status (with moderate RI [creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥ 30 to < 60 mL/min] and without RI [CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min]) and assessed for safety and efficacy. Results: Overall, from the 3 trials, data from 356 pts with moderate RI and 716 pts without RI were analyzed. Pts with moderate RI were slightly older (70 vs 63 yrs) and more commonly had International Staging System stage III disease (45.8% vs 25.4% in the 271 and 544 pts with available data). Median time from diagnosis was similar, 5.2 yrs (with moderate RI) vs 5.3 years (without RI); pts in both subgroups had a median of 5 prior Tx. The proportions of pts with moderate RI vs without RI who were refractory to LEN (95.5% vs 93.0%), BORT (82.0% vs 80.7%), and both LEN and BORT (78.4% vs 76.1%) were similar. The median Tx duration was slightly shorter for pts with moderate RI vs without RI (16.6 vs 20.4 weeks), but the median average daily dose (4.0 mg/day) and median relative dose intensity (0.9) were the same between renal subgroups. There were similar frequencies of discontinuations (7.4% vs 5.8%), dose reductions (22.7% vs 21.1%), and interruptions (63.1% vs 63.5%) due to adverse events (AEs) between subgroups of pts with moderate RI vs without RI. The most common grade 3/4 AEs for pts with moderate RI vs without RI were neutropenia (45.5% vs 48.3%), anemia (34.9% vs 27.5%), infections (31.3% vs 32.3%), and thrombocytopenia (21.3% vs 22.6%). The frequency of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism or peripheral neuropathy was ≤ 2% in both subgroups. The overall response rate (ORR) was 32.0% vs 33.0%, the median PFS was 18.1 weeks (95% CI, 15.6-20.9 weeks) vs 21.1 weeks (95% CI, 19.0-24.3 weeks), and median time to progression (TTP) was 20.3 weeks (95% CI, 17.3-24.1 weeks) vs 24.0 weeks (95% CI, 20.1-25.6 weeks) in pts with vs without moderate RI, respectively. Consistent with the poor prognosis associated with RI, median OS was shorter for pts with moderate RI (45.6 weeks [95% CI, 37.9-50.1 weeks]) vs those without RI (62.7 weeks [95% CI, 54.9-70.3 weeks]). Conclusions: In a pooled analysis of 3 trials of pts with RRMM treated with POM + LoDEX, ORR, PFS, TTP, and tolerability results appeared to be independent of the presence or absence of moderate RI. This analysis supports the use of POM + LoDEX as a standard of care in RRMM for pts with or without moderate RI. Disclosures Siegel: Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Weisel:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Travel Support; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Noxxon: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support. Dimopoulos:Genesis: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Baz:Karyopharm: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Richardson:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Delforge:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Song:Celgene Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. San Miguel:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yu:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hong:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sternas:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Palumbo:Novartis, Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria; Celgene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genmab, Janssen-Cilag, Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Selinexor Plus Pomalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone (SPd) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1993-1993
Author(s):  
Christine I Chen ◽  
Heather J. Sutherland ◽  
Rami Kotb ◽  
Michael Sebag ◽  
Darrell J. White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction - The nuclear export protein exportin 1 (XPO1) is overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers including multiple myeloma (MM). Selinexor is a first-in-class Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that binds and inactivates XPO1. Selinexor forces nuclear retention and reactivation of cell cycle regulators such as p53, IkB, and Rb. Pomalidomide/dexamethasone (Pd) is approved in relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM)with an overall response rate (ORR) of 30% and progression-free survival (PFS) rate of <4 months in patients (pts) having received a prior proteasome inhibitor (PI) and IMiD. Strategies to improve the ORR and PFS are needed. In murine MM models, the combination of selinexor with IMiDs shows synergistic anti-MM activity and good tolerability. Methods- Pts with RRMM who received ≥ 2 prior therapies including lenalidomide (len) and a PI were enrolled. Selinexor was evaluated in 2 different dosing schedules of once-weekly (QW, 60 or 80 mg) or twice-weekly (BIW, 60 or 80 mg), with pomalidomide (pom)3 or 4 mg PO daily, and dexamethasone (dex) 20 mg BIW or 40 mg QW. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, and preliminary efficacy of the combination of selinexor, pomalidomide, and low dose dex (SPd) in pts with RRMM. Results- As of July 20th2018, 34 pts (16 male / 18 female) have been enrolled. The median age is 61 years and patients received a median of 4 (range, 2 - 9) prior treatment regimens. Thirty-two patients were IMiD refractory (21 len, 11 pom/len). Six dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed: G3 fatigue (60 mg BIW, pom 4 mg), G3 febrile neutropenia (FN) (60 mg BIW, pom 3 mg), G3 FN and G4 neutropenia (80 mg QW, pom 4), G3 thrombocytopenia (80 mg QW, pom 3 mg) and 4 missed doses in Cycle 1 due to symptomatic hyponatremia (80 mg BIW, pom 4 mg). Enrollment on selinexor 80 mg QW, pom 3 mg is ongoing. Common SPd treatment related adverse events included (all grades, grades 3/4): neutropenia (62%, 56%), thrombocytopenia (59%, 32%), anemia (53%, 29%), anorexia (56%, 0%), fatigue (50%, 9%), nausea (47%, 0% ). Thirty pts were evaluable for response, which is outlined in Table 1. Median PFS is 10.3 months with a median follow up of 9.4 months. Conclusions- Enrollment is ongoing to evaluate once weekly selinexor in combination with Pd , (SPd). This all-oral SPd combination has clinical activity with an ORR 55% in pom-naive pts with heavily pretreated MM compared to previously published data of 30% ORR for Pd alone. Similarly, the PFS on SPd is 10.3 months vs. <4 months for Pd alone. No unexpected adverse events were noted. Phase 1 dose escalation of the combination of SPd is ongoing to define the optimal RP2D. Disclosures Chen: Amgen: Honoraria. Sebag:Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. White:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda: Honoraria. Bensinger:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Speakers Bureau. Gasparetto:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Research Funding. Leblanc:Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Venner:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Schiller:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Lipe:Celgene: Consultancy. Shah:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Jeha:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Saint-Martin:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bahlis:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Bortezomib–Melphalan–Prednisone (VMP) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients with Impaired Renal Function: Cohort Analysis of the Phase III VISTA Study.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1727-1727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios A Dimopoulos ◽  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Rudolf Schlag ◽  
Nuriet K Khuageva ◽  
Ofer Shpilberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Renal impairment is a major complication of multiple myeloma (MM) and is associated with poor prognosis. Early effective treatment can lead to improvement in renal function, which is associated with better outcomes. Bortezomib (VELCADE®) is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of MM based on the results of the large, international, phase III VISTA study in previously untreated MM patients ineligible for high-dose therapy, in which bortezomib plus melphalan–prednisone (VMP, N=344) was superior to melphalan–prednisone (MP, N=338) across all efficacy end points, including response rates, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Previous studies have shown bortezomib to be active and well tolerated in MM patients with renal impairment, including those requiring dialysis, and bortezomib pharmacokinetics are not influenced by degree of renal impairment (US label). In this analysis we assessed the efficacy and safety of VMP and MP in VISTA in patients with renal impairment. We also evaluated reversal of renal impairment after treatment. Treatment comprised nine 6-week cycles of VMP (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32, cycles 1–4, and days 1, 8, 22, and 29, cycles 5–9, plus melphalan 9 mg/m2 and prednisone 60 mg/m2 on days 1–4, cycles 1–9) or MP alone. Patients with serum creatinine &gt;2 mg/dL were excluded. At baseline, 19 (6%), 162 (48%), and 159 (47%) VMP patients, and 15 (4%), 168 (50%), and 154 (46%) MP patients, had creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≤30, 31–60, and &gt;60 mL/min, respectively. Efficacy of VMP was not affected by CrCl; complete response rate (28% vs 32%), TTP, and OS were not significantly different among patients with baseline CrCl ≤60 vs &gt;60 mL/min. Safety profiles were comparable among patients with CrCl of 31–60 and &gt;60 mL/min for both VMP and MP. In the VMP arm, rates of serious adverse events (SAEs; 42% vs 47%), grade 3 (52% vs 55%), 4 (28% vs 27%), and 5 (8% vs 8%) adverse events (AEs), and discontinuations due to AEs (13% vs 17%) were similar between the groups. Rates of SAEs (63%) and grade 4 AEs (42%) appeared somewhat higher in the small group of patients with CrCl ≤30 mL/min, but rate of discontinuations due to AEs (11%) was similar. Similar trends were seen in the MP arm, with rates of grade 4 and 5 AEs and discontinuations due to AEs appearing higher in patients with CrCl ≤30 mL/min, suggesting an effect independent of addition of bortezomib. Reversal of renal impairment, defined as an improvement in CrCl from &lt;50 mL/min at baseline to &gt;60 mL/min on treatment, was seen in 49/111 (44%) VMP patients vs 40/116 (34%) MP patients. Time to reversal in all patients with baseline CrCl &lt;50 mL/min was significantly shorter with VMP (Figure; hazard ratio 1.586, p=0.03). Among patients achieving renal impairment reversal, median time to reversal was 2.1 months (range 0.2–11.8) with VMP and 2.4 months (range 0.2–13.6) with MP. By multivariate analysis, rate of reversal was significantly higher in younger patients (49% vs 30%, age &lt;75 vs ≥75 years, p=0.006) and those with less severe renal impairment (42% vs 24%, CrCl ≥30 vs &lt;30 mL/min, p=0.027), and showed a trend towards significance for VMP vs MP (odds ratio 1.50, p=0.07). Patients treated with VMP who achieved renal impairment reversal had a trend for longer OS (1-year rate: 90% vs 81%) and a better safety profile (lower rates of SAEs, grade 5 AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs) than those who did not. In conclusion, VMP represents a feasible, active, and well-tolerated treatment option for newly diagnosed MM patients with renal impairment, and results in reversal of renal impairment in a significant number of patients. Figure. Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to reversal of renal impairment in patients with baseline CrCl &lt;50 mL/min Figure. Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to reversal of renal impairment in patients with baseline CrCl &lt;50 mL/min

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy in the Stratus (MM-010) Trial, a Single-Arm Phase 3b Study Evaluating Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 80-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Katja Weisel ◽  
Enrique M. Ocio ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) who have relapsed on or are refractory to treatment (Tx) with novel agents lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT) have few effective options for Tx and short overall survival (OS; Kumar, Leukemia, 2012). Pomalidomide (POM) is a distinct oral IMiDs® immunomodulatory agent with direct antimyeloma, stromal cell inhibitory, and immune modulatory effects (Quach, Leukemia 2010; Mark, Leuk Res, 2014). POM has been approved in the United States and the European Union for the Tx of pts with ≥ 2 prior Tx, including LEN and BORT, and progressive disease (PD) on Tx (EU, in combination with low-dose dexamethasone [LoDEX]) or within 60 days of completion of the last line of Tx (US). Results from the pivotal phase 3 MM-003 trial demonstrated that POM + LoDEX significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS) and OS vs high-dose dexamethasone in this pt population (San Miguel, Lancet Oncol, 2013). STRATUS is a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase 3b trial with > 85 sites across Europe designed to further evaluate safety and efficacy of POM + LoDEX in a large pt population (N = 456 at data cutoff). Methods: Eligible pts had refractory or relapsed and refractory disease (PD during or within 60 days of last line of Tx), previous BORT and LEN Tx failure, and adequate prior alkylator therapy as defined in study protocol. Pts must have been refractory to their last prior line of Tx. Key exclusion criteria included absolute neutrophil count < 800/μL , platelet count < 75,000 or < 30,000/μL (for pts with < 50% or ≥ 50% of bone marrow nucleated cells as plasma cells, respectively), creatinine clearance < 45 mL/min, hemoglobin < 8 g/dL, and peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade (Gr) 2. POM was administered at 4 mg D1-21 of a 28-day cycle in combination with LoDEX 40 mg/day (20 mg for pts aged > 75 yrs) on D1, 8, 15, and 22 until PD or unacceptable toxicity. All pts received thromboprophylaxis with low-dose aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or equivalent. The primary endpoint was safety, and key secondary endpoints included POM exposure, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response), duration of response (DOR), PFS, OS, and cytogenetic analyses. STRATUS is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01712789) and EudraCT (2012-001888-78). Results: As of March 17, 2014, 456 pts were enrolled and 452 had received POM + LoDEX; median age was 66 yrs (range, 37-88 yrs); median time since diagnosis was 4.9 yrs (range, 0.3-22.6 yrs). Pts were heavily pretreated with a median of 5 prior Tx (range, 2-18); 78% were refractory to BORT and LEN. Median follow-up was 6.8 mos with a median of 4 cycles received. Median PFS and OS were 4.3 mos and 10.9 mos, respectively (Figure 1). The ORR was 35%, with 6% of pts achieving ≥ very good partial response (VGPR); median DOR was 6.0 mos. Similar PFS (4.2 and 3.9 mos), OS (10.9 mos for each), and ORR (34% and 33%) were achieved in pts refractory to prior LEN (n = 427) or LEN and BORT (n = 356), respectively. In addition, PFS (4.3 and 3.9 mos), OS (11.5 mos and not estimable), and ORR (27% and 37%) were consistent in pts with LEN (N = 172) or BORT (N = 189) as last prior treatment, respectively. The most frequent Gr 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hematologic, including neutropenia (39%), anemia (27%), and thrombocytopenia (19%); Gr 3-4 non-hematological toxicities included pneumonia (11%), fatigue (5%), and hypercalcemia (4%). Gr 3-4 deep vein thrombosis was low (1%) with prophylaxis, and peripheral neuropathy was 1%. Dose reductions of either POM or LoDEX due to TEAEs were required in 28% of pts; discontinuations due to TEAEs were infrequent (9%). Conclusions: Results from STRATUS, the largest POM + LoDEX clinical trial thus far, were consistent with those observed in the pivotal MM-003 trial, and confirm that this regimen has an acceptable safety and efficacy profile and shows substantial improvements in PFS and OS benefits. Combination therapy with POM and LoDEX represents a new standard of therapy for pts with refractory or relapsed and refractory MM in whom LEN and BORT Tx failed. Disclosures Dimopoulos: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Palumbo:Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Weisel:BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Noxxon: Consultancy. Ocio:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cavo:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Delforge:Celgene Corp: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Oriol:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Goldschmidt:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Doyen:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morgan:Celgene Corp: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Myeloma UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; International Myeloma Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; The Binding Site: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MMRF: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Simcock:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Miller:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Slaughter:Celgene: Employment. Peluso:Celgene: Employment. Sternas:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Renal Impairment in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Consensus Statement on Behalf of the International Myeloma Working Group

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (33) ◽  
pp. 4976-4984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Asher Chanan-Khan ◽  
Nelson Leung ◽  
Heinz Ludwig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Renal Injury ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Acute Renal Injury ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
Cast Nephropathy ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Renal impairment is a common complication of multiple myeloma (MM). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula is the recommended method for the assessment of renal function in patients with MM with stabilized serum creatinine. In acute renal injury, the RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss and end-stage kidney disease) and Acute Renal Injury Network criteria seem to be appropriate to define the severity of renal impairment. Novel criteria based on eGFR measurements are recommended for the definition of the reversibility of renal impairment. Rapid intervention to reverse renal dysfunction is critical for the management of these patients, especially for those with light chain cast nephropathy. Bortezomib with high-dose dexamethasone is considered as the treatment of choice for such patients. There is limited experience with thalidomide in patients with myeloma with renal impairment. Thus, thalidomide can be carefully administered, mainly in the context of well-designed clinical trials, to evaluate if it can improve the rapidity and probability of response that is produced by the combination with bortezomib and high-dose dexamethasone. Lenalidomide is effective in this setting and can reverse renal insufficiency in a significant subset of patients, when it is given at reduced doses, according to renal function. The role of plasma exchange in patients with suspected light chain cast nephropathy and renal impairment is controversial. High-dose melphalan (140 mg/m2) and autologous stem-cell transplantation should be limited to younger patients with chemosensitive disease.

Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Renal Impairment: Results From a Phase II Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (20) ◽  
pp. 2035-2043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios Dimopoulos ◽  
Katja Weisel ◽  
Niels W.C.J. van de Donk ◽  
Karthik Ramasamy ◽  
Barbara Gamberi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial

Purpose Renal impairment (RI) limits treatment options in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we prospectively studied pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) in patients with RRMM and moderate or severe RI, including those receiving hemodialysis. Patients and Methods MM-013, a noncomparative, European phase II trial, enrolled three patient cohorts: moderate RI (cohort A; estimated glomerular filtration rate, 30 to < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2); severe RI (cohort B; estimated glomerular filtration rate, < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2); and severe RI that requires hemodialysis (cohort C). Patients received pomalidomide 4 mg/d on days 1 to 21 and LoDEX 20 or 40 mg once per week in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was overall response rate. Results Of 81 enrolled patients (33, 34, and 14 patients in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively), 13 were still receiving treatment at data cutoff (January 28, 2017). Overall response rates were 39.4%, 32.4%, and 14.3%, with a median duration of response of 14.7 months, 4.6 months, and not estimable, respectively. Of importance, 100%, 79.4%, and 78.6% of patients, respectively, achieved disease control. With a median follow-up of 8.6 months, median overall survival was 16.4 months, 11.8 months, and 5.2 months, respectively. Complete renal responses were observed only in cohort A (18.2%), and no patients in cohort C became hemodialysis independent. Grade 3 and 4 hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events and pomalidomide discontinuations as a result of treatment-emergent adverse events occurred more frequently in cohort C. Pomalidomide pharmacokinetics were comparable among the three renal cohorts. Conclusion Pomalidomide 4 mg/d plus LoDEX is efficacious in patients with RRMM with moderate or severe RI, including those who had more advanced disease and required hemodialysis. The safety profile was acceptable among the three groups, and no new safety signals were observed.

Reversibility of Renal Failure in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Multiple Myeloma and the Role of Novel Agents.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 955-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Roussou ◽  
Efstathios Kastritis ◽  
Dimitrios Christoulas ◽  
Magdalini Migkou ◽  
Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Agent Based ◽  
Renal Response ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Novel Agent

Abstract Abstract 955 Renal impairment (RI) is a common complication of multiple myeloma (MM) and is associated with increased mortality. High dose dexamethasone-based regimens have been extensively used for the initial management of patients with MM presenting with RI. Recently, novel agent-based regimens have been introduced in the frontline management of MM. The purpose of our analysis was to assess the effect of novel agent-based regimens on the rate of RI improvement and compare their efficacy with conventional chemotherapy (CC) plus dexamethasone (Dexa) in newly diagnosed MM patients. Over the last decade, 82 patients with newly diagnosed MM and RI, defined as creatinine clearance (CrCI) <50ml/min, received frontline treatment in our Center. Patients were divided into three groups: group A: 28 patients who received CC plus Dexa-based regimens (VAD, VAD-like regimens, melphalan plus Dexa); group B: 38 patients who received IMiDs-based regimens (thalidomide or lenalidomide with high dose Dexa and/or cyclophosphamide or melphalan) and group C: 16 patients who received bortezomib-based regimens with Dexa. Renal complete response (RCR) was defined as a sustained increase of baseline CrCI to >60ml/min. Renal partial response (RPR) was defined as an increase of CrCI from<15 to 30-50ml/min. Renal minor response (RMR) was defined as sustained improvement of baseline CrCI of<15ml/min to 15-29 ml/min, or, if baseline CrCI was 15-29 ml/min, improvement to 30-59 ml/min. Patients in group B were older than those of groups A and C (p=0.01) while more patient in group C had light chain only MM than in groups A and B (p=0.04). There were no significant differences in the severity of RI, Bence Jones proteinuria, hypercalcemia or ISS stage among the three groups. Improvement of renal function, recorded as RMR or better, was achieved more frequently in patients treated with novel agents (group B: 87% and in group C: 94%) than in patients treated with CC plus Dexa-based regimens (64%, p=0.024). Among 9 patients who required renal dialysis 3 became independent of this procedure after treatment. We subsequently focused our analysis in major renal responses (RPR or RCR), because this endpoint is clinically more relevant. RCR was achieved in 43% of patients in group A, in 50% in group B and in 69% of patients in group C (p=0.2) and RCR+RPR rates were 50% and 57% and 81% for groups A, B and C respectively (p=0.1). Creatinine clearance <30 ml/min was associated with a significantly lower probability of RCR or RPR only in patients treated with CC plus Dexa- or with IMiDs-based regimens (p<0.01), but not in patients treated with bortezomib (p=0.529). The probability of RPR+RCR was similar for patients treated with IMiDs compared to CC plus Dexa-based regimens (p=0.619). In multivariate analysis bortezomib–based regimens (p=0.02, OR: 7, 95% CI 1.5-25) and CrCl>30 ml/min (p=0.002, OR: 6.1, 95% CI 2.5-22.5) were independently associated with a higher probability of RCR+RPR. The median time to RPR was similar for patients treated with IMiDs compared to CC plus Dexa-based regimens (2.2 months for Group A, 1.5 months for Group B, p=0.587) but it was significantly shorter for Group C (0.7 months, p=0.017). Other factors associated with a shorter time to ≥RPR included CrCl>30 ml/min (p=0.039) and age<75 (p=0.089). In multivariate analysis bortezomib–based regimens (p=0.004, OR: 3 95% CI 1.6-6.7) and CrCl>30 ml/min (p=0.006, OR: 2.5 95% CI 1.3-4.5) were independently associated with a shorter time to ≥RPR. In landmark analysis (time was one month in order to reduce bias due to early deaths), rapid improvement of renal function (≤1 month) was associated with a trend for a longer survival compared to patients who achieved renal response later (>1 month) (47 vs. 21 months, p=0.19). Myeloma response to treatment was 58%, 68% and 79% for the three treatment groups respectively and was associated with renal response (p=0.024), though less strongly with a major renal response (p=0.061). Our data indicate that novel agent-based regimens can improve renal function in most patients; furthermore bortezomib-based regimens improve renal function to a higher degree and significantly more rapidly than CC plus Dexa-based or IMiD-based regimens even in patients with severe renal impairment. We conclude that bortezomib-based regimens may be the preferred treatment for newly diagnosed myeloma patients who present with renal impairment. Disclosures: Dimopoulos: JANSSEN-CILAG: Honoraria; CELGENE: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document