scholarly journals Azacitidine Maintenance after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Is Feasible in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplasia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5884-5884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Antar ◽  
Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja ◽  
Hussein Abou Ghaddara ◽  
Rami Mahfouz ◽  
Ali Bazarbachi
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Abnormal Karyotype ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: 5-Azacidine (5-AZA) is a DNA hypomethylating agent with proven clinical activity in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A recent non-randomized study reported promising results with the use of lower doses of 5-AZA as maintenance therapy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It is important to note that 5-AZA has an immunomodulatory effect and might enhance the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Here, we report the successful use of 5-AZA maintenance following allogeneic HSCT in patients with high risk AML and MDS. Patients and methods: Nine patients (M=6, F=3; median age=49 (36-65) years ) with high-risk AML (n=6 including 2 abnormal karyotypes) or MDS (n=3 including 1 abnormal karyotype) received 5-AZA as post-transplant maintenance at a dose of 32mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 4 weeks starting at a median time of 100 (30-210) days post-transplant. All patients were in complete remission at initiation of 5-AZA. A median of 12 cycles (1-18) were delivered. Patients’ characteristics, treatment details, response and side effects are summarized in Table I. Results: After a median follow-up of 19 months post HSCT and 15 months after starting 5-AZA treatment, five patients with normal karyotype are still in CR. Conversely, all three patients with abnormal karyotype rapidly developed disease recurrence while they were receiving 5-AZA after a median of 3 months. Overall, the actuarial 1-year progression free and overall survival rates were 65% and 90%, respectively. 5-AZA was generally well tolerated with only mild thrombocytopenia observed in 2 patients. No clinically evident graft-versus-host disease exacerbation was observed. Conclusion: These results suggest that Low-dose 5-AZA is an effective maintenance therapy post- allogeneic SCT in high-risk AML and MDS particularly when a normal diploid karyotype is present. The relative lack of efficacy in the presence of an abnormal karyotype is intriguing and questions whether these subjects might benefit from higher doses of 5-AZA or other novel therapies within the context of a well-designed clinical trial. Prospective clinical trials and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these observations. Abstract 5884 TABLE I.Patients characteristics and Outcomes After Azacitidine maintenanceSubject #123456789Age at transplant655848433649495851genderMMFMFMFMMDiseaseAMLAMLAMLAMLSecondary AMLSecondary AMLMPD/MDSMDS (RAEB-2)MDS (RAEB-2)cytogeneticnormalnormalT(6,9)normalDel 5normalnormalnormalHypoploidy(43-45)Molecular abnormalityNoneNoneNoneFLT3 ITDNoneNoneNoneNoneNoneDisease status at HSCTCR2CR3CR1CR1RefractoryCR1PRPRCR1Donor typeMRDMRDMRDMRDMUDMRDMRDMRDMRDConditioningFB2+ATGFB3+ATGFB3+ATGFB4+ATGFB3+ATG+ TBI (4Gy)FB4+ATGFB4+ATGFB3+ATGFB2+ATGGVHD prophylaxisCSACSACSACSACSACSACSACSACSA, mycophenolate mofetilTime from HSCT to 5-AZA (days)37701001503021010055104Disease status at 5-AZACRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRCRnb of cycles12131241218129ToxicityNoneNoneNoneNoneGrade II thrombocytopeniaGrade II thrombocytopeniaNoneNoneNoneGVHD after 5-AZANoNoYesYesYesNoYesNoNoDisease recurrencenonoyesnoyesnononoyesSalvage therapy if recurrenceN/AN/AChemotherapy followed by DLIN/ANoneN/AN/AN/AChemotherapy followed by DLIProgression free survival, months13+24+124+319+21+18+10Status at last follow upCRCRCRCRdiedCRCRCRCRSurvival, months13+24+18+24+519+21+18+34+ Stem cell source for all patients: peripheral blood; CR: complete remission; PR: partial remission; CSA: cyclosporine A; MRD: matched related donor; MUD: matched unrelated donor; PBSC: peripheral blood stem cell; CCR: continuous complete remission; FB4: 5 days fludarabine plus 4 days busulfan (130 mg/m2/day); FB3: 5 days fludarabine plus 3 days busulfan (130 mg/m2/day); FB2: 5 days fludarabine plus 2 days busulfan (130 mg/m2/day) ATG: anti-thymoglobuline; DLI: donor lymphocyte infusion. Disclosures Off Label Use: Azacitidine maitenance post HSCT.

The superiority of haploidentical related stem cell transplantation over chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for patients with intermediate- or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (23) ◽  
pp. 5584-5590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Jun Huang ◽  
Hong-Hu Zhu ◽  
Ying-Jun Chang ◽  
Lan-Ping Xu ◽  
Dai-Hong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
First Complete Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract We report the results of a prospective, patient self-selected study evaluating whether haploidentical related donor stem cell transplantation (HRD-HSCT) is superior to chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for patients with intermediate- or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Among totally 419 newly diagnosed AML patients, 132 patients with intermediate- and high-risk cytogenetics achieved CR1 and received chemotherapy alone (n = 74) or HSCT (n = 58) as postremission treatment. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 4 years was 37.5% ± 4.5%. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 4 years were 64.5% ± 5.1% and 55.6% ± 5.0%, respectively. The cumulative incident of relapse for the HRD-HSCT group was significantly lower than that for the chemotherapy-alone group (12.0% ± 4.6% vs 57.8% ± 6.2%, respectively; P < .0001). HRD-HSCT resulted in superior survival compared with chemotherapy alone (4-year DFS, 73.1% ± 7.1% vs 44.2% ± 6.2%, respectively; P < .0001; 4-year OS, 77.5% ± 7.1% vs 54.7% ± 6.3%, respectively; P = .001). Multivariate analysis revealed postremission treatment (HRD-HSCT vs chemotherapy) and high WBC counts at diagnosis as independent risk factors affecting relapse, DFS, and OS. Our results suggest that HRD-HSCT is superior to chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for AML.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Effect of Patient Characteristics and Treatment History.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4577-4577
Author(s):  
Francesco Spina ◽  
Emilio Paolo Alessandrino ◽  
Lucia Farina ◽  
Raffaella Milani ◽  
Francesca Bonifazi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Treatment History ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 4577 Patients with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (tAML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (tMDS) have a bad prognosis. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is potentially curative, but the majority of these patients die because of the high incidence of relapse (RI) and non relapse mortality (NRM). Since it is critical to understand which patients should receive alloSCT, we designed this retrospective study to assess which patients’ characteristics may predict the alloSCT outcome in tAML/tMDS. All the patients affected by tAML or tMDS and allografted in 4 Italian hematology units between 1998 and 2009 were included. Total patients were 28: 24 (86%) had tAML, 4 (14%) had tMDS. Patients had a median age of 49 years (range 21–65) at transplant; 15 patients were female (54%). Previous neoplasia was lymphoma in 23 patients (82%, 15 Hodgkin and 8 non-Hodgkin), or non-hematologic cancer (5, 18%) like breast carcinoma (2), seminoma (1), testicular embryonal carcinoma (1), and osteosarcoma (1). Previous cancer had been treated with chemotherapy (CT, 7 patients, 25%), radiotherapy (RT, 4 patients, 14%), or both (17, 61%). Fourteen patients (50%) had received >=2 therapy lines, 6 (21%) had received autologous stem cell transplant. tAML/tMDS occurred after a median time of 86 months (range 13–253) after the previous cancer treatment. Cytogenetic analysis was performed in 24 patients (86%): 8 patients (33%) had intermediate risk and 16 (57%) high risk cytogenetics according to Medical Research Council AML10 Trial definitions. Twenty-three patients (82%) received induction CT for tAML/tMDS, 19 (68%) received consolidation; 5 patients (18%) received upfront alloSCT. Induction consisted of idarubicin+cytarabine+/−etoposide (12 patients, 43%) or fludarabine+cytarabine+/−idarubicin (11 patients, 39%); 15 patients (54%) had an infection after induction. Median time from tAML/tMDS diagnosis to alloSCT was 5.7 months (range 0–25). At transplant, 10 patients (36%) had a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)<=80% and 13 (46%) a Sorror comorbidity score >1. Donor was identical sibling for 9 patients (32%), and alternative for 19 patients (68%): mismatched related (1, 3%), matched unrelated (15, 54%) or haploidentical (3, 11%). Disease status of patients at transplant was as following: 12 patients (43%) were in CR (11 in CR1), 4 (14%) in PR and 7 (25%) in PD; 5 patients (18%) received alloSCT at diagnosis. Patients underwent reduced intensity (11 RIC, 39%) or myeloablative (17, 61%) alloSCT. Myeloablative conditioning was mainly busulfan-based (15 patients, 54%); the majority of RIC patients received thiotepa+cyclophosphamide-based conditioning (9, 32%). Twelve patients (43%) are alive at last follow-up, 7 patients (25%) died of disease, 9 (32%) died of NRM. The main reason of death by NRM was infection (8 patients, 29%). Median follow-up of surviving patients was 528 days (55-1704). One- and 2-years overall survival (OS) was 50% and 36%, progression free survival (PFS) was 42% and 38%. RI was 28% at both 1 and 2 years, NRM was 18% at 100 days, 30% at 1 year and 35% at 2 years. Nine (32%) patients had acute GVHD of grade >=2, 8 patients had chronic GVHD (cGVHD, 29%), 3 patients (11%) had extensive cGVHD. OS and PFS were reduced in patients with high-risk cytogenetics (p=0.03 and p=0.01, respectively) and KPS<=80% (p=0.008 and p<0.001). RI was higher in patients with KPS<=80% (p=0.02); high-risk cytogenetics increased RI (trend, p=0.08). Patients treated for previous neoplasia with >2 CT lines had a worse NRM (p=0.005) and a reduced OS (p=0.05); treatment type (CT vs RT vs CT+RT) did not have a significant impact on OS, PFS nor NRM. NRM was higher in patients who had infections after induction (p=0.009), or received consolidation (p=0.03). AlloSCT after >180 days from tAML/tMDS diagnosis increased NRM (p=0.05). Conditioning (RIC vs myeloablative), donor type (identical sibling vs alternative) and type of previous neoplasia (hematologic vs non-hematologic) did not affect survival (OS and PFS), NRM and RI. In conclusion, alloSCT is effective in a minority of patients with tAML/tMDS. Survival is reduced by high risk cytogenetics and poor KPS. Number of previous treatments, infections after induction, and consolidation CT increase NRM. Thus, patients’ selection for alloSCT in tAML/tMDS setting should be based on cytogenetics, KPS, and treatment history. Prospective trials are awaited in order to confirm these results. Disclosures: Corradini: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Genezyme: Consultancy; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celegene: Speakers Bureau.

Efficacy of clofarabine and low-dose cytarabine combination for genetically high-risk acute myeloid leukemia prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18515-e18515
Author(s):  
Carlos Enrique Vigil ◽  
Nusrat Jahan ◽  
Oana Valeria Paun ◽  
Jennifer Weis ◽  
Kevin Heckman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Low Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

e18515 Background: The outcome of genetically high risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (pts) remains poor, with a median overall survival (OS) of a few months after the failure of regimens. Long-term survival requires complete remission followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT).Clofarabine, a deoxyadenosine analog, at 20mg/m2 days 1-5, in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) has reported efficacy and tolerability in older newly diagnosed AML pts (Cancer 2015;121:2375). We have therefore prioritized this combination for relapsed/refractory(R/R) pts. Aims:Determine the efficacy of Clofarabine and low dose cytarabine in R/R AML pts who are eligible for ASCT. Methods: Using Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center database, we performed a retrospective chart review on 16 pts of R/R AML who were treated with Clofarabine and LDAC between January 2014 and Dec 2016. Each patient received Clofarabine 20mg/m2on days 1-5 IV and LDAC on days 1-10 subcutaneous. The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi). Secondary endpoint was median OS. Results: Sixteen pts were analyzed. The median age was 58 years (range 27-78). Nine pts (56%) had AML with high risk characteristics (complex karyotype and/or presence of FLT3-ITD). Nine pts achieved either a CR or CRi. Responses were observed in 7of 9 pts with genetically high-risk features. 2 pts had mutated TP53, and both of them achieved CR. The median OS time was 13.25 months (range 3.6-19.2 months). 4 pts received ASCT after treatment combination. Conclusions: These results suggest that Clofarabine is well-tolerated and effective in the treatment of R/R AML pts, especially those with high-risk genetics. Clofarabine and LDAC could be used as a bridging therapy prior to ASCT for high-risk R/R AML pts. Future clinical trials are warranted to explore additional modifications to this combination in order to optimize therapy for this group of high-risk and heavily treated R/R AML pts.

scholarly journals Haploidentical T-Repleted Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT) Has Comparable Survival to 10/10 and 9/10 Unrelated SCT in Poor-Cytogenetics Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Complete Remission: A Study on Behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 852-852
Author(s):  
Francesca Lorentino ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Fabio Ciceri ◽  
Massimo Bernardi ◽  
Jordi Esteve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
First Complete Remission ◽  
Risk Of Relapse ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is the most powerful therapy to prevent relapse in poor-cytogenetics risk acute myeloid leukemia (poorAML) patients (pts) in first complete remission (CR1). For pts who lack a matched related donor (MRD), SCT from an unrelated (UD) or alternative donor is indicated. Pts with poorAML and thus at high risk of relapse can theoretically benefit the most from SCT from haploidentical donors (HaploSCT), which is an attractive option as the time required to find a well-matched UD could be inacceptable. Several recent reports show comparable outcomes between HaploSCT and transplants from UD (Piemontese S, JHO 2017; Versluis J, Blood Advances 2017). Comparative studies able to include sufficient numbers of pts with poorAML in CR1 are limited; this prompted us to compare the outcomes of HaploSCT to those of 10/10 and 9/10 HLA-matched UD in this disease category. Methods: We retrospectively selected denovo poorAML pts in CR1 receiving T-repleted haplo (n=74), 10/10 UD (n=433) and 9/10 UD SCT (n=123) from 2007 to 2015 who were reported to the ALWP of EBMT Registry. PoorAML was defined as the presence of: complex karyotype (at least 3 structural abnormalities per clone); monosomal karyotype (1 autosomal monosomy plus 1 monosomy or structural abnormality); inv(3)/t(3;3); -5 or del(5q); -7 or abn(7q); t(v;11)(v;q23); abn(17p); t(6;9); t(9;22). Primary endpoints were leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD and cGVHD), relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Results: Main population characteristics are depicted in Table 1. Recipients of haplo-, 10/10 UD- and 9/10 UD-SCT were comparable concerning time from diagnosis to SCT and time from CR1 to SCT. HaploSCT more likely received bone marrow as stem cell source. In-vivo T cell depletion (TCD) with ATG was most likely adopted in UD-SCT, with a conversely increased use of high-dose post-transplant Cyclophosphamide as GvHD prophylaxis backbone in HaploSCT (65% Vs 3% for 10/10 UD and 2% for 9/10 UD, p&lt;10¯³). LFS and OS at 2 years were not significantly different between haploSCT, 10/10 UD SCT and 9/10 UD SCT (53±12% and 59±12%, 43±5% and 50±6%, 44±9% and 50±9%, respectively, p=0.5 and p=0.5, respectively). In Haplo-SCT, the 100-day cumulative incidence (CI) of grade≥2 aGvHD was in line with the one reported for 10/10 and 9/10 UD (33±11% for haplo, 30±4% for 10/10 UD and 34±9% for 9/10 UD, p=0.6). Likewise, the 2-y CI of cGvHD (35±12%) of HaploSCT was similar to those of 10/10 UD (36±4%) and 9/10 UD (36±9%), p=0.8. The 2-y CI of NRM was 19±8% after haploSCT, 18±4% after 10/10 UD SCT and 18±6% after 9/10 UD SCT (p=0.9). Relapse incidence was not significantly affected by donor source, with a 2-y CI of 27±9% for haploSCT, 39±5% for 10/10 UD SCT and 37±9% for 9/10 UD SCT (p=0.3). After adjustment for centre effect, pts age, time from diagnosis to SCT, conditioning intensity, in-vivo TCD, donor/pts gender and CMV serostatus, the multivariable model showed that haploSCT recipients didn't experience worse outcomes compared to 10/10 and 9/10 UD. Indeed, compared to haploSCT (reference) the hazard ratio (HR) for LFS was 1.2 for 10/10 UD (p=0.3) and 1.2 for 9/10 UD (p=0.4). The hazards for OS in 10/10 and 9/10 UD did not differ from haplo-SCT (1.3, p 0.3 and 1.2, p 0.4, respectively). Moreover, compared to haplo, SCT from 10/10 and 9/10 UD was not associated with lower hazards for relapse (HR: 1.4, p=0.2 and 1.4, p=0.3, respectively), NRM (HR: 1, p=0.9 and 1, p=0.9, respectively), grade≥2 aGvHD (HR: 1.2, p=0.6 and 1.4, p=0.3, respectively) and cGvHD (HR: 1.2, p=0.5 and 1.3, p=0.4, respectively). The only factor associated with worse LFS and OS was pts age (for each 10-year interval: HR 1.1, p=0.02 and 1.2, p=0.001, respectively). Conclusions: In the present series of poorAML pts transplanted in CR1, haploSCT recipients experienced comparable outcomes with respect to 10/10 and 9/10 HLA-matched UDs. This suggests that the immunotherapeutic effect of allogeneic SCT is exerted similarly across these different donor sources in this peculiar population. Therefore, in the absence of a MRD, pts with poor risk cytogenetics who have a very high risk of relapse could be allocated to haploSCT in their first remission, especially in the context of the recent improvements, which fostered an abatement of GvHD and NRM rates, historically the main detrimental factors for Haploidentical transplants. Disclosures Ciceri: GSK: Other: B-thalassemia gene therapy was developed by Fondazione Telethon and Ospedale San Raffaele and has been inlicenced by GSK that provides funding for the clinical trial, Research Funding. Mohty: Sanofi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Impact of induction chemotherapy with intermediate-dosed cytarabine and subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation on the outcome of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Fleischmann ◽  
Ulf Schnetzke ◽  
Jochen J. Frietsch ◽  
Herbert G. Sayer ◽  
Karin Schrenk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with antecedent hematological disease (s-AML) and treatment-related AML (t-AML) predicts poor prognosis. Intensive treatment protocols of those high-risk patients should consider allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in first complete remission (CR). Despite allo-HSCT, relapse rate remains high. Induction chemotherapy with liposomal cytarabine and daunorubicin (CPX-351) has been approved for patients with AML with myeloid-related changes (AML-MRC) or t-AML based on improved survival and remission rates compared to standard 7 + 3 induction. Patients and methods 110 patients with newly diagnosed s-AML or t-AML at a university hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Median age was 62 years (24–77 years). A total of 65 patients with s-AML after MDS (59%) and 23 patients (20.9%) with t-AML were included. Induction chemotherapy consisted of intermediate-dosed cytarabine (ID-AraC) in combination with idarubicin (patients up to 60 years) or mitoxantrone (patients over 60 years). In patients subsequently undergoing allo-HSCT, reduced conditioning regimens (RIC) were applied prior to transplantation in 47 of 62 patients (76%). Results Induction chemotherapy with ID-AraC resulted in an overall response rate of 83% including complete remission (CR/CRi) in 69 patients (63%) with a low rate of early death (2.7%). Most relevant non-hematologic toxicity consisted of infectious complications including sepsis with need of intensive care treatment in five patients (4.5%) and proven or probable invasive fungal disease in eight patients (7.2%). Relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort were 19 months (0–167), 10 months (0–234) and 15 months (0–234), respectively (p < 0.0001). A significant improvement of OS was observed in patients who underwent allo-HSCT compared to those without subsequent allo-HSCT: 9 vs. 46 months, p < 0.0001. Rate of transplantation-related mortality (TRM) in the early phase post allo-HSCT was low (0.9% at day 30 and 1.8% at day 90, respectively). RIC conditioning results in OS rate of 60% after 60 months post allo-HSCT (median OS not reached). Conclusion S-AML and t-AML patients receiving induction chemotherapy with intermediate-dosed cytarabine showed satisfactory response rate and consolidation therapy with allo-HSCT after full or reduced-intensity conditioning further improved survival in these patients with similar outcome as reported for CPX-351.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document