The Safety and Activity of BMS-906024, a Gamma Secretase Inhibitor (GSI) with Anti-Notch Activity, in Patients with Relapsed T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL): Initial Results of a Phase 1 Trial

Abstract Background: Activating mutations in Notch receptors are found in multiple hematopoietic malignancies, including > 50% of patients with T-ALL, making it the most common genetic abnormality in this disease. GSIs block activation of Notch receptors and limit growth and survival in pre-clinical T-ALL models. However, various GSIs evaluated in clinical trials have had on target toxicities and have not been reported to show significant responses. CA216002 is a multicenter phase 1 trial designed to assess the safety of a novel intravenous GSI BMS-906024 in patients with relapsed or refractory T-ALL and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LL). We are presenting the initial toxicity profile and response data on this trial. Methods: Adults with relapsed/refractory T-ALL or T-LL were enrolled and received BMS-906024 intravenously weekly at doses of 0.6 mg, 4 mg, and 6 mg. Due to the rapid progression of T-ALL in many cases, administration of glucocorticoids or other agents was permitted and dosing guidelines for dexamethasone were provided in the protocol. Results: As of July 2, 2014, safety and response data are available on 25 patients (age 18-74 yrs) with relapsed/refractory T-ALL/T-LL that received at least one dose of BMS-906024, at doses of 0.6 mg (n=1), 4 mg (n=10), and 6 mg (n=14). Seven patients did not complete the first 4-week cycle due to rapid disease progression or disease-related death (n=5), infusion reaction (n=1), or an unrelated adverse event (n=1). Safety: The drug-related grade 3-5 adverse events included grade 4 events of anemia, hypophosphatemia, and thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 events of diarrhea, febrile bone marrow aplasia, hepatotoxicity, hypophosphatemia, pancytopenia, and tumor lysis syndrome (n=1 each). Drug-related diarrhea was common (n=11, 44%), consistent with expectations for Notch inhibition, but was generally grade 1-2 with only one grade 3 event. One dose-limiting toxicity involving grade 3 elevations of ALT and AST without bilirubin elevation (reported as grade 3 hepatotoxicity) occurred at the 4 mg dose level. One death not related to disease progression occurred, due to GI and post-surgical hemorrhage associated with pancytopenia; hemorrhage was considered not related, but pancytopenia was considered related to study drug. Responses: Eight patients (32%; 4 at 4 mg and 4 at 6 mg) had at least 50% reduction in bone marrow (BM) blasts, including one formal CR and one PR (both at 6 mg), and three of these eight had 98-100% clearance of BM blasts. (One patient, marked “*” below, began the study with 0.1% BM blasts and is not included in the eight.) The patient who achieved a CR began the study with 85% BM blasts and an absolute peripheral blood (PB) blast count of 38 k/mcL. By the end of the first cycle the BM and PB were cleared of blasts, and by the end of the second cycle there was count recovery. This patient received dexamethasone during the first cycle only, and left the study after 3 cycles in CR for an allogeneic transplant. The patient who achieved a PR began with 32% BM blasts, and by the end of the first cycle the BM blasts had decreased to 7% with improvement in ANC. The additional six patients with 50-100% decreases in BM blasts had residual lymphadenopathy, had incomplete count recovery or failed to meet other criteria which prevented them from being considered CR or PR based on the protocol definitions. One of these six patients also received hydroxyurea beginning on study day 16. Biomarkers: The figure shows change in BM blasts in 12 patients with paired BM assessments and Notch mutation status available. BM responses occurred in both Notch mutant and wildtype patients. Conclusions: Overall 8 of the 25 patients (32%) showed at least 50% reduction in BM blasts including one CR and one PR. Although the contribution of concurrent glucocorticoid therapy to the improvement in some patients is not clearly defined, the multiple responses on this trial suggest anti-leukemia activity of BMS-906024. This represents the first Notch targeting trial leading to multiple responses in relapsed/refractory T-ALL. BMS-906024 was relatively well tolerated, with minimal diarrhea in this population. The weekly dosing of this long-acting GSI shows promise for targeting Notch in T-ALL. Pharmacokinetic and additional biomarker data will be presented. Figure 1 Figure 1. Maximum Percent Reduction from Baseline of BM Blasts in Patients with Paired BM Assessments and Known Mutation Status Disclosures Zweidler-McKay: BMS: Research Funding. Off Label Use: BMS-906024 is in early Phase I clinical trials, and does not yet have an FDA-approved indication.. Douer:BMS: Research Funding. Ottmann:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Vey:BMS: Honoraria. Thomas:BMS: Research Funding. Zhu:BMS: Employment. Huang:BMS: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bajaj:BMS: Employment. Fischer:BMS: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Interim Analysis of a Phase 1 Trial of SGN-CD33A in Patients with CD33-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.623.623 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 623-623 ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Eytan M. Stein ◽

Anthony Stein ◽

Roland B. Walter ◽

Amir T. Fathi ◽

Jeffrey E. Lancet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Intensive Therapy ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Rapid Clearance ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Levels ◽

Bone Marrow Blasts

Abstract Background CD33 is expressed on the surface of myeloblasts in 85 to 90% of patients with AML and represents a promising target regardless of age, risk factors, or underlying mutational heterogeneity. SGN-CD33A is an anti-CD33 engineered cysteine antibody conjugated to an average of 2 molecules of a pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) dimer, a highly potent DNA crosslinking agent. Upon binding to the cell surface, SGN-CD33A is internalized and transported to the lysosomes where PBD dimer is released within the cell through proteolytic cleavage of the linker, crosslinking DNA and leading to cell death. Methods This phase 1, open-label, 3+3 dose-escalation study (NCT01902329) is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-leukemic activity of SGN-CD33A. Eligible patients (ECOG 0-1) must have CD33-positive AML, and have either relapsed disease following initial remission (CR) of > 3 months, or have declined conventional induction/consolidation. SGN-CD33A is administered outpatient IV every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles (Part A), followed by optional maintenance treatment for patients achieving a CR/CRi (Part B). Investigator assessment of response is per IWG criteria (Cheson 2003). Results To date, 40 patients (48% female) with a median age of 75 years (range, 27-86) have been treated. Twenty patients had relapsed AML after 1st CR with intensive therapy (3 of these had intensive frontline therapy plus 1 additional line of low intensity therapy); 20 had declined conventional intensive therapy (13 of these patients had received 1-2 prior low intensity therapies, primarily hypomethylating agents). Of the patients enrolled, 45% had underlying myelodysplasia and most had disease with intermediate (70%) or adverse (18%) cytogenetic risk, 8% with mutated NPM1 (without FLT3 mutation) and 13% with mutated FLT3. Dose levels tested were 5 mcg/kg (n=3), 10 mcg/kg (n=3), 20 mcg/kg (n=13), 40 mcg/kg (n=18), and 60 mcg/kg (n=3). To date, a maximum of 4 cycles was received in Part A and 10 cycles in Part B (total median of 2 cycles on treatment; range, 1-13 cycles). Thirteen patients remain on treatment and enrollment is ongoing. Two dose-limiting toxicities have been reported, a Grade 3 pulmonary embolism (20 mcg/kg) and a Grade 4 hypocellular marrow (>28 days; 40 mcg/kg). The only Grade 3 or higher adverse event (AE) reported in >10% of patients was febrile neutropenia (55%). Other treatment-emergent AEs regardless of relationship to study treatment reported in ˃10% of patients were fatigue (48%), diarrhea (20%), constipation (18%), cough (18%), dyspnea (18%), epistaxis (18%), peripheral edema (18%), malaise (15%), hypokalemia (13%), and pleural effusion (13%). The 30-day mortality was 2.5%, with no treatment-related deaths occurring during that time; 1 elderly patient died from a traumatic fall unrelated to SGN-CD33A. Blast clearance in marrow was obtained in 16 of 38 efficacy evaluable patients (42%) across all dose levels. A dose-response relationship is evolving with rapid and marked decreases in bone marrow blasts at 40 and 60 mcg/kg in 19 of 21 patients (Figure 1). Of 17 efficacy evaluable patients treated at 40 mcg/kg, 8 experienced clearance of marrow blasts; these patients achieved a best clinical response of CR (2), CRi (3), and morphologic leukemia-free state (mLFS; 3) thus far. In addition, complete remissions were observed at 5 mcg/kg (1 CR), 10 mcg/kg (1 CRi), and 20 mcg/kg (2 CRis). Preliminary PK data demonstrated rapid clearance of ADC, suggesting target-mediated disposition. Plasma ADC exposure generally increased with increasing dose levels. Conclusions A MTD for SGN-CD33A is not yet identified and enrollment continues. AEs observed were generally manageable, often associated with underlying myelosuppression. To date, SGN-CD33A has demonstrated antileukemic activity with 47% achieving blast clearance at the 40 mcg/kg dose level. The observed low 30-day mortality (2.5%) and rapid clearance of marrow blasts in patients with poor risk factors (median age 75, predominantly intermediate and adverse cytogenetic risk, and 45% underlying myelodysplasia) with outpatient administration are encouraging. Enrollment is ongoing to further define optimal dose and schedule. In addition, combinations of SGN-CD33A with standard AML and MDS agents will be evaluated. Figure 1: Bone Marrow Blasts Over Time Figure 1:. Bone Marrow Blasts Over Time Disclosures Stein: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Off Label Use: SGN-CD33A is an investigational agent being studied in patients with AML. SGN-CD33A is not approved for use. Stein:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Walter:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding. Fathi:Exelixis: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lancet:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kovacsovics:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Advani:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. DeAngelo:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. O'Meara:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhao:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kennedy:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Erba:Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.2719.2719 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 2719-2719 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Luhua Wang ◽

Luis Fayad ◽

Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽

Sattva Neelapu ◽

Felipe Samaniego ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Mantle Cell ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2719 Poster Board II-695 Background: Rituximab directly targets CD20 positive lymphoma cells while lenalidomide targets the microenvironment. This combination was proven effective in vitro and in vivo in mantle cell lymphoma (Wu et al, Clin Cancer Res 2008; Zhang et al, Am J Hematol 2009). Clinically, lenalidomide (Habermann et al, Br J Haematol 2009) and rituximab have single-agent activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and may be an effective combination. The goal of our study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in phase 1 and evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in phase 2. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory MCL received lenalidomide on days 1–21 of every 28-day cycle, and rituximab (375 mg/m2) weekly during cycle 1. Dose escalation was used to determine the MTD with lenalidomide (10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25 mg). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic, or grade 4 hematologic adverse events in cycle 1. Phase 2 has reached targeted enrolment with 45 patients treated at MTD. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression free survival rate and response duration. Median time to event in months with 95% confidence interval was calculated. Of 45 patients treated at the MTD, the median age was 66 (46–85), 91% were males. All patients had received prior rituximab and were enrolled regardless of prior rituximab sensitivity or resistance. Results: The median follow-up time for the censored observations was 11.4 months. Two DLTs occurred at 25 mg in phase 1 (hypercalcemia, non-neutropenic fever); therefore, the MTD was 20 mg. The grade 3–4 non-hematologic events included elevated AST, elevated ALT, fatigue, myalgia, tremors, ataxia, cough, deep vein thrombosis, dyspnea, edema (facial), infection, neuropathy sensory, rash, and respiratory failure. Grade 3–4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (37 events), neutropenic fever (4 events), and thrombocytopenia (16 events). There were no responses in patients treated at 10 mg or 15 mg. Thirty six patients (36) were evaluable for response. Nine (9) patients are too early in their treatment and are not yet eligible for response evaluation. Among the 36 evaluable patients, 11 (31%) patients achieved CR, 8 (22%) patients achieved PR, 3 (8%) patients had minor response, 6 (17%) patients had stable disease and 8 (22%) patients had progressive mantle cell lymphoma. The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 53%. Seventy eight (78%) patients achieved stable disease or better and benefited from oral Lenalidomide plus 4 doses of rituximab. The median time to response was 2 months (2–8), and the median duration of response for the 19 patients with CR or PR was 18 months (95% CI: 10.6, NA) (range1–30 months). The median progression free survival for all patients on phase 2 was 14 months (95% CI: 9.8, NA) (ranging from 1–32 months). Conclusion: Oral lenalidomide plus rituximab resulted in durable responses in relapsed/refractory MCL with a favourable toxicity profile. Disclosures: Wang: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hagemeister:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Samaniego:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Yi:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Elan: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bell:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Knight:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zeldis:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Phase II Study of the Pan-Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Bortezomib-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (PANORAMA 2)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.814.814 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 814-814 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Paul G. Richardson ◽

Melissa Alsina ◽

Donna M. Weber ◽

Steven E. Coutre ◽

Sagar Lonial ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Treatment Phase ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Overall Response ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Stage 1

Abstract Abstract 814FN2 Background: Patients with refractory multiple myeloma (MM) have limited treatment options and an extremely poor prognosis. A recent study of patients who were refractory to bortezomib and were relapsed following, refractory to or ineligible to receive an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD, thalidomide or lenalidomide) demonstrated a median event-free survival of only 5 months (Kumar S et al, Leukemia, 2011). Panobinostat is an oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi) that increases acetylation of proteins involved in multiple oncogenic pathways. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic anti-myeloma activity of the combination of panobinostat and bortezomib through dual inhibition of the aggresome and proteasome pathways. In a phase I study (B2207) of patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM treated with panobinostat + bortezomib, clinical responses (≥ minimal response [MR]) were observed in 65% of patients, including in patients with bortezomib-refractory disease. PANORAMA 2 seeks to expand upon these preliminary results and seeks to determine whether panobinostat can sensitize resistant patients to a bortezomib-containing therapeutic regimen. Methods: PANORAMA 2 is a single arm, phase II study of panobinostat + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. Patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory MM (≥ 2 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and who had progressed on or within 60 days of the last bortezomib-based therapy) are treated in 2 phases. Treatment phase 1 consists of 8 three-week cycles of oral panobinostat (20 mg days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12) + intravenous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11) + oral dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). Patients demonstrating clinical benefit (≥ stable disease) can proceed to treatment phase 2, consisting of 4 six-week cycles of panobinostat (20 mg TIW 2 weeks on 1 week off, and repeat) + bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 22, 29) + dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). The primary endpoint is overall response (≥ partial response [PR]), as defined by the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 1998 criteria, in the first 8 cycles of treatment phase 1. A Simon 2-stage design is used to test the primary endpoint where ≥ 4 responses (≥ PR) in 24 patients are needed in stage 1 in order to proceed to stage 2, where ≥ 9 responses in all patients (N = 47) are required to reject the null hypothesis (overall response rate ≤ 10%). Results: A sufficient number of responses ≥ PR were observed in stage 1 to allow for enrollment to continue to stage 2. As of 15 July 2011, 53 patients with bortezomib-refractory MM were enrolled. Safety and demographic data were available for 48 patients. The median age was 61 (41–88) years. Patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 4 (2–14) prior regimens, and most patients (69%) received prior autologous stem cell transplant. Efficacy data were available for 44 patients. At the time of this analysis, 9 patients achieved ≥ PR (2 near CR [nCR] and 7 PR) as best overall response, and an additional 7 patients achieved an MR. Responders exhibited a long duration on therapy, and, to date, 8 patients have proceeded to treatment phase 2. The 2 patients with nCR have received ≥ 10 cycles of treatment (duration of therapy 190 and 253 days). Four patients who achieved PR have received ≥ 9 cycles (duration of therapy 155–225 days). Updated response data will be presented. Common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included, fatigue (52%), diarrhea (41%), thrombocytopenia (38%), nausea (38%), and anemia (21%). Gastrointestinal AEs were generally mild, with a relatively low incidence of grade 3/4 events. Grade 3/4 AEs were generally hematologic in nature, with grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia reported in 38%, 12%, and 10% of patients, respectively. Other common nonhematologic grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (10%) and pneumonia (10%). Of note, to date, a relatively low rate of peripheral neuropathy (17%) has been observed. No grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy has been observed. Conclusions: The combination of panobinostat and bortezomib is a promising treatment for patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. These data, along with forthcoming data from the phase III study of panobinostat/placebo + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM (PANORAMA 1), will further define the potential role of panobinostat in the treatment of patients with MM. Disclosures: Richardson: Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alsina:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weber:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Gasparetto:Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Warsi:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ondovik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mukhopadhyay:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Snodgrass:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Subset Analysis of Response to Treatment of Chronic Phase CML in a Phase 1 Study of Ponatinib in Refractory Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.602.602 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 602-602 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Neil Shah ◽

Dale Bixby ◽

Michael J. Mauro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mutation Status ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 602 Background: Ponatinib is a potent, oral, pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor active against the native enzyme and all tested resistant mutants, including the uniformly resistant T315I mutation. Initial findings of a phase 1 trial in patients (pts) with refractory hematologic malignancies have been reported. The effect of duration of treatment, prior treatment, and mutation status on response to treatment was examined in CML chronic phase (CP) pts who responded to ponatinib. Methods: An open-label, dose escalation, phase 1 trial of ponatinib in pts with hematologic malignancies is ongoing. The primary aim is to assess the safety; anti-leukemic activity is also being investigated. Pts resistant to prior treatments or who had no standard treatment available were enrolled to receive a single daily oral dose of ponatinib (2 mg to 60 mg). Subset analyses of factors impacting cytogenetic and molecular response endpoints (MCyR and MMR) were performed for pts with CP-CML. Data are presented through April 15, 2011. Results: In total, 81 pts (54% male) received ponatinib. Overall, 43 pts had CP with 34 ongoing at analysis. MCyR was observed as best response in 31/43 (72%), 27 (63%) CCyR. The median time to MCyR was 12 (3 to 104) wks. Response rates were assessed by duration of treatment (1 pt in CCyR at entry was excluded; 6 pts in PCyR had to achieve CCyR). At the 3 month assessment, 22/42 (52%) CP pts achieved MCyR; at 6 months, 24/42 (57%); at 12 months, 29/42 (69%) had MCyR. The impact of prior treatment on response and time to response was assessed. 42 pts (98%) had >2 prior TKIs and 28 (65%) ≥3 prior TKIs, including investigational agents. Of approved TKIs, all pts were previously treated with imatinib, 19 dasatinib or nilotinib after imatinib, and 21 both dasatinib and nilotinib after imatinib. MCyR rate decreased with number of prior TKIs (2 prior TKIs 13/14 [93%], ≥3 prior TKIs 17/28 [61%]) and number of approved TKIs (imatinib followed by dasatinib or nilotinib 17/19 [90%], or by both dasatinib and nilotinib 12/21 [57%]). Time to response was prolonged in pts more heavily treated with prior TKIs. Median time to MCyR increased with the number of prior TKIs and approved TKIs (2 TKIs 12 wks, ≥3 TKIs 32 wks). The effect of mutation status on response and time to response was also evaluated. At entry, 12 pts had the T315I mutation, 15 had other BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations, 12 had no mutations detected, 4 did not allow sequencing. MCyR response rate for CP pts with T315I was 11/12 (92%); for other mutations, 10/15 (67%); and no mutation, 7/12 (58%). Similarly, mutation status had an impact on time to response: median time to MCyR was 12 wks for those with T315I or other mutations and 32 wks in resistant pts with no mutation. All CP patients were evaluable for MMR. At analysis, MMR was 17/43 (40%). MMR rate was inversely related to number of prior TKIs (2 TKIs 10/14 [71%], ≥3 TKIs 6/28 [21%]), approved TKIs (imatinib followed by dasatinib or nilotinib 12/19 [63%], or by both dasatinib and nilotinib 4/21 [19%]), and was higher for T315I pts (7/12, 58%) and those with other mutations (7/15, 47%) compared with no mutation (2/12, 17%). Median time to MMR for CP pts was 97 wks; median time to MMR was shorter for pts who were less heavily treated (2 prior TKIs 24 wks) and those with T315I or other mutations (63 wks). Conclusion: In this subset analysis of the phase 1 data, ponatinib had substantial activity in all subgroups analyzed. Time on treatment, less prior therapy and kinase domain mutations were associated with higher response rates and early responses in CP pts. Cytogenetic responses improved over the first 12 months of treatment and were higher in less heavily treated pts. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Shah:Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bixby:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau. Mauro:ARIAD: Research Funding. Flinn:ARIAD: Research Funding. Hu:ARIAD: Employment. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Druker:MolecularMD: OHSU and Dr. Druker have a financial interest in MolecularMD. Technology used in this research has been licensed to MolecularMD. This potential conflict of interest has been reviewed and managed by the OHSU Conflict of Interest in Research Committee and t. Deininger:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Talpaz:ARIAD: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

An Open-Label, Phase 1 Study of R-CVP in Combination with Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Patients with CD22-Positive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Preliminary Safety and Efficacy Data

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1633.1633 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1633-1633

Author(s):

Michinori Ogura ◽

Kiyohiko Hatake ◽

Andrew Davies ◽

Michael Crump ◽

Kensei Tobinai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Efficacy Data ◽

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Common Grade ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1633 Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent antitumor antibiotic. CD22 is expressed on the majority of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). This phase 1 study was conducted to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of INO when given in combination with R-CVP (rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 all on Day 1 and prednisone 40 mg/m2on Days 1–5) every 21 days, and to obtain preliminary safety and efficacy data for this regimen. Patients and methods: The study enrolled patients with relapsed/refractory CD22+ B-cell NHL. The dose-escalation part (Part 1; previously presented) identified the MTD as INO 0.8 mg/m2 given on Day 2 with R-CVP q3wks [Blood. 2011;118:3715]. Subsequent cohorts included the MTD confirmation cohort (Part 2) and MTD expansion cohort (Part 3), for collection of additional safety and preliminary efficacy data. Untreated patients who were not candidates for anthracyclines were allowed in Part 2 and Part 3 of the study. In Part 2 (n = 10), confirmation of the MTD required a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of <33% in Cycle 1 and fewer than 1/3 of patients discontinuing prior to Cycle 3 due to an adverse event (AE). In Part 3 (n = 22), additional patients were enrolled to explore preliminary signs of activity of INO when given in combination with R-CVP. Results: In Parts 2 and 3, a total of 32 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 15), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 16), or mantle cell lymphoma (n = 1) were enrolled. CD22 expression was confirmed by immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry prior to enrollment. The median age was 65 years (range, 44–81 years); 34% of patients had 1 prior anti-lymphoma regimen, 34% had 2, 28% had ≥3, and 3% (n = 1) had no previous therapy (median, 2; range, 0–6). The median number of cycles received was 5 (range, 1–6). In Part 2, the MTD was confirmed as standard-dose R-CVP plus INO 0.8 mg/m2, with 2 of 10 patients presenting with a DLT (grade 3 increase in alanine/aspartate aminotransferases [ALT/AST] and grade 4 neutropenia requiring granulocyte-colony stimulating factor). Four patients discontinued due to AEs after 2 cycles (n = 1), 3 cycles (n = 2), and 5 cycles (n = 1), respectively. Across Parts 2 and 3, the most common treatment-related AEs (all grades) were thrombocytopenia (78%), neutropenia (66%), fatigue (53%), constipation (50%), leukopenia (50%), and nausea (41%); the most common grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (63%), thrombocytopenia (53%), leukopenia (38%), lymphopenia (31%), increased ALT (9%), increased AST (6%), and febrile neutropenia (6%). There was 1 case of treatment-related fatal pneumonia associated with grade 4 neutropenia. Ten patients discontinued study treatment due to AEs, with thrombocytopenia or delayed recovery from thrombocytopenia being the leading AE causing study drug discontinuation (n = 9 [grade 1/2, n = 6; grade 3/4, n = 3]). The best overall response (ORR; partial + complete response [CR]) from Part 2 and 3 (31 evaluable patients) was 77% (n = 24/31), including 29% (n = 9/31) with CR. Of patients with FL, the ORR was 100% (n = 15/15), including 53% (n = 8/15) with CR. Of patients with DLBCL, the ORR was 60% (n = 9/16), including 7% (n = 1/16) with CR. Conclusions: Results from this phase I study showed that R-CVP in combination with INO 0.8 mg/m2 may have acceptable toxicity and promising activity in patients with relapsed or refractory CD22+ B-cell NHL, based on the response rates in FL and DLBCL. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were hematological toxicities, notably thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Follow-up for progression-free survival and overall survival is currently ongoing; however, the observed results warrant additional study in both indolent and aggressive B-cell NHL. Disclosures: Ogura: Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Hatake:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Davies:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Crump:Pfizer, Celgene, Roche, Millennium, Seattle Genetic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tobinai:Merck, Zenyaku, Symbio, Biomedics, Pfizer, GSK, Chugai/Roche: Research Funding. Smith:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Offner:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Wang:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ishibashi:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Paccagnella:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vandendries:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. MacDonald:Roche Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Interim Analysis of a Phase 1 Study of the Antibody-Drug Conjugate SGN-CD19A in Relapsed or Refractory B-Lineage Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.1741.1741 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 1741-1741 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Craig H. Moskowitz ◽

Andres Forero-Torres ◽

Bijal D. Shah ◽

Ranjana Advani ◽

Paul Hamlin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Objective Response ◽

Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background CD19, a B-cell specific marker, is expressed in the majority of patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). SGN-CD19A is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) via a maleimidocaproyl linker. Methods This ongoing phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study investigates the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SGN-CD19A in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL (NCT 01786135). Eligible patients are ≥12 years of age and must have a confirmed diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including transformed follicular histology; mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); follicular lymphoma grade 3 (FL3); Burkitt lymphoma; or B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Patients must be relapsed or refractory to at least 1 prior systemic regimen. Patients with DLBCL or FL3 must have also received intensive salvage therapy with or without autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), unless they refused or were deemed ineligible. A modified continual reassessment method is used for dose allocation and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) estimation. SGN-CD19A is administered IV on Day 1 of 21-day cycles (0.5–6 mg/kg). Response is assessed with CT and PET scans according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results To date, 44 patients have been treated: 39 patients (89%) with DLBCL (including 10 with transformed DLBCL), 4 (9%) with MCL, and 1 (2%) with FL3. Median age was 65 years (range, 33–81). Patients had a median of 2 prior systemic therapies (range, 1–7), and 10 patients (23%) had autologous SCT. Twenty-six patients (59%) were refractory to their most recent prior therapy, and 18 (41%) were relapsed. Patients received a median of 3 cycles of treatment (range, 1–12) at doses from 0.5–6 mg/kg. Eleven patients (25%) remain on treatment, and 33 have discontinued treatment (18 due to progressive disease [PD], 5 for investigator decision, 5 for adverse events [AE], 4 because of patient decision/non-AE, and 1 for SCT). No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in Cycle 1 has been reported. Treatment-emergent AEs reported in ≥20% of patients were blurred vision (59%), dry eye (39%), fatigue (39%), constipation (32%), keratopathy (23%), and pyrexia (20%). Corneal exam findings consistent with superficial microcystic keratopathy were observed in 25 patients (57%) and were mostly Grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 corneal AEs were observed in 4 patients at the higher doses; the majority resolved or improved to Grade 1/2 at last follow-up. Corneal AEs were treated with ophthalmic steroids, and during the trial steroid eye drop prophylaxis was instituted with each dose of study drug. SGN-CD19A ADC plasma exposures were approximately dose-proportional. Accumulation was observed following multiple dose administrations, consistent with a mean terminal half-life of about 2 weeks, suggesting less frequent dosing might be possible. In the 43 efficacy-evaluable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) is 30% (95% CI [17, 46]), including 7 complete responses (CRs; 16%) and 6 partial responses (PRs; 14%). Of the 13 patients with an objective response, 8 are still on study with follow-up times of 0.1–31 weeks; 2 are no longer on study; and 3 had subsequent PD or death with response durations of 14, 19, and 31 weeks. Table Best Clinical Response by Disease Status Relative to Most Recent Therapy, n (%) Relapsed N=17 Refractory N=26 Total N=43 CR 5 (29) 2 (8) 7 (16) PR 4 (24) 2 (8) 6(14) SD 4 (24) 9 (35) 13 (30) PD 4 (24) 13 (50) 17 (40) ORR (CR + PR), (95% CI) 53 (28, 77) 15 (4, 35) 30 (17, 46) Conclusions To date, SGN-CD19A has shown evidence of clinical activity with an ORR of 30% and CR rate of 16%. Enrollment in the trial is ongoing to further refine optimal dose and schedule. SGN-CD19A is generally well-tolerated. No DLTs have been observed in tested dose levels. Observed ocular AEs are manageable with steroid eye drops and dose modifications. The high response rate (53%) in relapsed patients and low rate of bone marrow suppression or neuropathy suggest that SGN-CD19A could be incorporated into novel combination regimens in earlier lines of therapy. Disclosures Moskowitz: Merck: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: SGN-CD19A is an investigational agent being studied in patients with B-cell malignancies. SGN-CD19A is not approved for use. . Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Shah:Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; SWOG: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; NCCN: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Advani:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda International Pharmaceuticals Co.: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Travel expenses Other. Hamlin:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim:Bayer: Consultancy; Eli Lily: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kostic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sandalic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhao:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel expenses Other.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Clinical Trial of the Novel Structure Proteasome Inhibitor NPI-0052 in Patients with Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.431.431 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 431-431 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Paul Richardson ◽

Craig Hofmeister ◽

Andrzej Jakubowiak ◽

Todd M. Zimmerman ◽

Matthew A. Spear ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Light Chain ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Proteasome Inhibition ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 431 Background: NPI-0052 has a novel, non-peptide based, bicyclic structure resulting in a unique proteasome inhibition and safety profile. In contrast to other proteasome inhibitors, NPI-0052 produces rapid, broad and prolonged inhibition of all 3 catalytic activities. Preclinical data subsequently suggested improvements in toxicology and efficacy, including activity MM resistant to bortezomib (BZ) and other agents (Chauhan et al, Cancer Cell 2005), thus this Phase 1 dose escalation trial in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory MM was initiated. Materials and Methods: Patients (pts) were treated with NPI-0052 IV weekly for 3 weeks in 4-week cycles. Measurable disease by EBMT criteria was not required. The dose of NPI-0052 was escalated using a combination of accelerated titration and 3+3 design. PK and proteasome inhibition (blood and PBMCs) were assayed after the first and third doses. Preliminary Results: 27 pts have been treated at doses ranging from 0.025 to 0.7 mg/m2; median age is 62; 18 males/9 females; IgG/IgA/light chain/non-secretory 14/4/2/6; median of 4 prior regimens and 27% refractory to prior bortezomib. Reversible DLT was observed in two out of eight patients treated at 0.7 mg/m2 (Grade 3 fatigue; Grade 3 mental status changes and loss of balance), with 2 additional pts undergoing dose reductions in Cycle 1 (nausea and vomiting; vertigo and confusion/word-finding difficulties). Prophylactic anti-emetics have been instituted with a decrease in infusion-related nausea; similarly, pts with dizziness/vertigo have been administered meclizine with symptomatic improvement. Other drug-related adverse events have consisted principally of mild-to-moderate fatigue, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache and diarrhea; interestingly, myelosuppression, neuropathy and thrombosis do not appear to be elicited by NPI-0052. PK assessment demonstrates a rapid elimination half-life (<20 minutes) and relatively large Vz. NPI-0052 produces dose dependent proteasome inhibitions. At 0.7 mg/m2, Day 1/Day 15 inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity in whole blood is 73% and 99%, respectively (the value for bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 is 65%). One patient with IgA MM (4 prior regimens plus ASCT; relapsed after prior BZ, not refractory) had a 71% decrease in M-protein (unconfirmed PR; off study after 3 cycles). A second pt with non-secretory disease (4 prior regimens;relapsed after prior BZ, not refractory) had a nearly 50% reduction in involved light chain; this pt remains active on study at 5+ months. In addition, 8 pts with relapsed/refractory MM remained on study for between 6-15 months (3 pts were on-study for over one year) with stable disease and no significant toxicity; 2 of these pts were BZ-refractory. Conclusions: Tolerability of 0.7 mg/m2 continues to be investigated in pts with MM, with prophylactic antiemetics and meclizine to reduce common drug-related toxicities of nausea and dizziness. The safety profile of NPI-0052 is importantly different from bortezomib in spite of higher and more durable proteasome inhibition; peripheral neuropathy and thrombocytopenia were not seen. Accrual continues to expand upon these results and assess the new lyophile formulation of NPI-0052. Disclosures: Richardson: Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that was approved in the FDA in October 2006 for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. Jakubowiak:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Spear:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Palladino:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Longenecker:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Neuteboom:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cropp:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Lloyd:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hannah:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Anderson:Nereus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Initial Findings From the PACE Trial: A Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib, or with the T315I Mutation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.109.109 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 109-109 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽

Philipp D. Le Coutre ◽

Charles Chuah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Initial Response ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Primary Endpoints ◽

T315i Mutation ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 109 Background: Despite progress in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), patients (pts) who fail dasatinib or nilotinib or pts with T315I mutation have no treatment options. Ponatinib is a potent, oral, pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor active against the native enzyme and all tested resistant mutants, including the uniformly resistant T315I mutation. Methods: The PACE trial (Ponatinib Ph+ALL and CML Evaluation) was initiated in September 2010. The objective of this international, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial is to establish the efficacy and safety of ponatinib. Pts with refractory CML in chronic, accelerated or blast phase (CP, AP or BP), or Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), resistant or intolerant (R/I) to dasatinib or nilotinib or with the resistant T315I mutation received 45 mg ponatinib orally once daily in one of 6 cohorts: CP R/I; CP T315I; AP R/I; AP T315I; BP/ALL R/I; BP/ALL T315I. The primary endpoints are major cytogenetic response (MCyR) for CP and major hematologic response (MaHR) for AP, BP or ALL. The trial is ongoing; projected enrollment is approximately 450. Data as of 18 July 2011 are reported. Results: At analysis, 403 pts were enrolled; 397 were treated and eligible. The median age was 59 (range, 18–94) years, 52% were male. Diagnoses were: CP R/I, n=188; CP T315I, 48; AP R/I, 52; AP T315I, 15; BP/ALL R/I, 51; BP/ALL T315I, 43. Median time from initial diagnosis to start of ponatinib was 6.2 years. Prior TKIs included imatinib (93%), dasatinib (85%), nilotinib (66%), and bosutinib (8%); 94% failed >2 prior TKIs, and 57% failed >3 prior TKIs. Overall, 88% had a history of resistance to dasatinib or nilotinib, and 12% were purely intolerant. Mutation status was determined centrally by MolecularMD. Overall, 106 pts had the T315I mutation. Of 291 R/I pts, 110 (38%) had non-T315I BCR-ABL mutations, most frequently F317L (10%), F359V (5%), E255K (4%), and G250E (4%). To date, 343 (85%) pts remain on therapy, 60 (15%) have discontinued (42 BP/ALL): 24 (6%) progressive disease (20 BP/ALL); 11 (3%) AE (3 pain, 3 thrombocytopenia, 1 each haemorrhage, loss of consciousness, enterocolitis, cytokine release syndrome, hepatotoxicity/pleuro-pericardial effusion after overdose); 8 (2%) died (3 related; 7 BP/ALL); 17 (4%) other. The most common drug-related AEs (≥10% any grade) were thrombocytopenia (19%; 15% grade 3/4), rash (18%), dry skin (13%), myalgia (12%), abdominal pain (11%; 3% grade 3/4), headache (11%), arthralgia (11%). Overall, 67 (17%) pts experienced at least 1 related SAE. The most common related SAEs (>5 cases) were pancreatitis 15 cases (3.7%), 5 cases each (1.2%) diarrhea, anemia, febrile neutropenia, and pyrexia. At the time of reporting, 159/397 eligible pts were evaluable for the primary endpoints. Median follow-up was 57 days. Of CP pts, 83 had an assessment at 3 months (10 at 6 months) or discontinued. In CP R/I, 25/60 (42%) attained MCyR (15 CCyR). In CP T315I, 13/23 (57%) had MCyR (11 CCyR). The overall CP MCyR rate was 38/83 (46%) (26 CCyR). Of AP, BP/ALL pts, 76 had an assessment at 1 month or later or discontinued. In AP, 17/23 (74%) R/I and 1/1 T315I pts achieved MaHR. In BP/ALL, 11/30 (37%) R/I and 6/22 (27%) T315I pts had MaHR. Conclusion: In this first analysis of the pivotal PACE trial, ponatinib has a favorable early safety profile, similar to that observed in phase 1, but with a lower incidence of pancreatitis. Initial response data after short follow-up indicate ponatinib has substantial anti-leukemic activity in this heavily pretreated population, and in pts with refractory T315I. These early efficacy signals replicate initial response results reported in the phase 1 setting. Updated data will be presented at the annual meeting. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Pinilla-Ibarz:ARIAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Le Coutre:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Research Funding. Paquette:ARIAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Apperley:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Sqibb: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Chemgenex: Honoraria; Genzyme: Honoraria. DiPersio:Genzyme: Honoraria. Rea:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Talpaz:ARIAD: Research Funding. Abruzzese:Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Baccarani:Pfizer Oncology: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer Oncology: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wong:MolecularMD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:ARIAD: Employment. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Dose-Ranging Study of Oral Ezatiostat Hydrochloride (Telintra®, TLK199) in Combination with Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) in Patients with Non-Deletion(5q) Low to Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2778.2778 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2778-2778

Author(s):

Azra Raza ◽

Naomi Galili ◽

Deborah Mulford ◽

Scott E. Smith ◽

Gail Brown ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Platelet Transfusion ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Off Label ◽

Transfusion Independence ◽

Dose Ranging ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Abstract Abstract 2778 Introduction: Lenalidomide is approved for the treatment of del(5q) MDS in US and Japan. In Low to Intermediate-1 (Int-1) risk non-del(5q) MDS, lenalidomide treatment is less effective with a lower response rate (25%) and shorter response duration [Raza A. et al, Blood, 2008.111,1]. Ezatiostat, a glutathione S-transferase P1-1 (GST P1-1) inhibitor, activates Jun kinase, promoting the growth and maturation of hematopoietic progenitors while inducing apoptosis in malignant cells. Based on the novel mechanism of action, response rates, non-overlapping toxicities, and tolerability observed in a single agent ezatiostat Phase 2 study in MDS, a study of the combination of ezatiostat and lenalidomide was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of ezatiostat with lenalidomide in non-del(5q) Low to Int-1 risk MDS. Methods: In this multicenter Phase 1 dose-ranging study, ezatiostat was given at a starting dose of 2000 mg in combination with lenalidomide at 10 mg, days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. In stage 1, 3–6 patients in a standard 3+3 design were treated before escalation to the ezatiostat/lenalidomide 2500/10 mg dose level. Treatment was given until lack of MDS response or unacceptable toxicity. Hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) rates were determined by the MDS International Working Group (IWG; 2006) criteria. Results: Eighteen pts (median age 73 yrs; range 57–82; 72% male), with World Health Organization classifications: 4 refractory anemia (RA), 2 RA with excess blasts-1, 4 refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD), 5 RCMD with ring sideroblasts, 2 MDS-unclassified, 1 MDS/myeloproliferative disorder-U were enrolled. Thirteen pts (72%) were Int-1 risk, 5 (28%) Low risk; 4 pts (22%) had abnormal cytogenetics. Twelve RBC transfusion-dependent pts (67%) required a median of 6 units (range 4–10)/8-weeks. Two pts (11%) were platelet transfusion dependent. A total of 67 treatment cycles were given (median 3.5 cycles/pt [range 1–11]) and only 6 cycles (9%) required dose reductions and 8 (12%) dose delays. Two of 6 pts reported DLTs (Grade 3 diarrhea and Grade 3 rash) at 2500/10 mg, with 9 additional pts receiving the recommended combination dose of 2000/10 mg. Eleven of 18 pts were evaluable (4 at 2500/10 mg and 7 at 2000/10 mg), and 3 pts are still on therapy with insufficient treatment duration to be evaluable. The HI-E rate was 43% (3/7; 95% CI, 10%–82%) for pts at the recommended 2000/10 mg dose and 6 pts are continuing therapy at the time of analysis. Three of 8 (38%; 95% CI, 9%–76%) RBC transfusion-dependent evaluable pts achieved transfusion independence including 1 responder who did not respond to prior lenalidomide. In responders, the median increase in hemoglobin level was 3.4 g/dL (from 7.9 g/dL). In 2 of 4 thrombocytopenic pts, a HI-platelet (HI-P) response was observed. A bilineage (HI-E and HI-P) response in 2 of 4 pts with anemia and thrombocytopenia was reported. One RBC and platelet transfusion-dependent pt who had a poor response to prior anti-thymocyte globulin treatment achieved complete RBC and platelet transfusion independence. The combination was generally well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. Most common treatment-related non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were Grades 1 and 2 including: fatigue (6%, 28%), swelling (0%, 11%), anorexia (11%, 6%), rash (0%, 6%), skin odor (11%, 6%), nausea (39%, 11%), diarrhea (22%,17%), vomiting (28%,17%), upper abdominal pain (5.6%, 5.6%), and constipation (11%, 0%). Grade 3 events were rash (11%), nausea (6%), diarrhea (17%), and vomiting (6%). Most common hematologic-related AEs were Grades 1 and 2 thrombocytopenia (11%, 6%) and neutropenia (0%, 11%). Grade 3–4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (11%, 17%), neutropenia (17%, 11%), anemia (6%, 6%), and febrile neutropenia (11%, 0%). Conclusions: Ezatiostat is the first GST P1-1 inhibitor to cause clinically significant reductions in RBC and platelet transfusions, including RBC and platelet transfusion independence. Since ezatiostat is non-myelosuppressive, it is a good candidate for combination with lenalidomide and in this study, the combination was well tolerated. Interestingly, ezatiostat may also have the potential to enhance lenalidomide's efficacy. The recommended doses of this combination regimen for future studies is the ezatiostat/lenalidomide 2000/10 mg. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Lenalidomide was used off-label in patients with non-del5q MDS. Mulford:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Brown:Telik, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Meng:Telik, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lyons:Incyte: Research Funding; Telik: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mesa:NS Pharma: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; SBio: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Weekly Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD22-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2612.2612 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2612-2612 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Daniel DeAngelo ◽

Wendy Stock ◽

Stephen Petersdorf ◽

Shaw-Ling Wang ◽

Angela Volkert ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Flow Cytometry ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2612 Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic antitumor agent. CD22 is expressed on a majority of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). An initial study suggested INO efficacy and tolerability in ALL (Lancet Oncol 2012;13:403-11). Objectives: The current phase 1, multicenter, dose-escalation study was performed to optimize the INO dose and schedule (weekly dosing) based on safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic data in CD22+ relapsed or refractory ALL. The safety and efficacy of INO at the recommended dose and schedule will subsequently be further evaluated in a 12-patient (pt) expanded cohort. Methods: Eligible pts were aged ≥18 y with CD22+ ALL (defined as ≥20% blasts CD22+ by flow cytometry) refractory to initial induction or in relapse (≥first relapse), with no evidence of central nervous system disease. INO was administered in 28-d cycles (see Table), with a maximum of 6 cycles. The final dose was to be determined based on both toxicity (ie, rate of dose-limiting toxicities [DLT] at each dose level) and evidence of efficacy using the EffTox V2.10 software (Biometrics 2004;60:684–693). Adverse event (AE) severity was assessed per CTCAE V3 with DLTs defined as any of the following INO-related events during Cycle 1: grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity; prolonged myelosuppression (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] <500/μL or platelets <25,000/μL in bone marrow) with no evidence of leukemia persisting >45 d from last dose; grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity persisting >7 d from the last dose; grade ≥3 elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), or bilirubin persisting >7 d; or any toxicity resulting in permanent INO discontinuation. Weekly teleconferences with investigators were used to assess toxicity. Complete response (CR) was defined as <5% bone marrow blasts with absence of peripheral blasts, ANC ≥1,000/μL, platelets >100,000/μL, and no extramedullary disease; incomplete CR (CRi) was similar but permitted ANC <1,000/μL and/or platelets ≤100,000/μL. Results: We report preliminary data for 13 pts (see Table), with a median duration of follow-up of 147 d (range, 30–188 d). Median age was 56 y (range, 23–65 y), and 69% of pts were male. Five (39%) pts were in salvage 1, 2 (15%) were in salvage 2, and 4 (31%) were in salvage ≥3. Two pts had prior allogeneic stem cell transplant. Three (23%) pts were Ph+ and 7 (54%) pts had circulating blasts at baseline; median baseline WBC was 2.01×103/mm3 (range, 0.5–29.11×103/mm3). The single DLT observed to date was transient grade 4 elevated lipase occurring at INO dose level 3. The most frequent (≥10% of pts) treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (31%, all grade 3/4), neutropenia (15%), and elevated ALT (15%). Treatment-related elevated AST and alkaline phosphatase were each reported for 8% of pts. Reported dose delays were due to thrombocytopenia (n = 3), neutropenia (n = 2), elevated LFT (n = 2), bacteremia, increased blood creatinine, periorbital cellulitis, and QTc prolongation (n = 1 each). Fourteen serious AEs were reported for 9 pts, including 2 cases each of febrile neutropenia and septic shock. Responses were observed across all INO doses explored to date (see Table). The preliminary response rate was 82% (9/11 evaluable pts), including 36% of pts with a CR and 45% with a CRi. Median time to response was 43 d (range, 28–56 d). Six of 9 (67%) pts who achieved CR/CRi also achieved minimal residual disease (<1 blast out of 104 mononuclear cells by flow cytometry). Seven pts discontinued treatment, including 1 each due to disease progression and an AE (acute renal failure, not treatment related), and 5 pts who proceeded to transplant. Four deaths were reported, including 1 due to disease progression and 3 due to sepsis occurring within 30 d after stem cell transplantation. Conclusions: INO had a safety profile consistent with prior reports, characterized by hematologic, gastrointestinal, and hepatic events and infection. The remarkable response rate of 82% for single-agent INO in this relapsed/refractory population warrants further exploration in CD22+ ALL. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Stock: Tau for work done through the CALGB/ALLIANCE: Research Funding. Wang:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Volkert:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vandendries:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Advani:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text