CC-486 (Oral Azacitidine) Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (AlloHSCT) in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Abstract Background: Disease relapse and graft vs host disease (GvHD) following alloHSCT are major causes of treatment (Tx) failure in patients (pts) with MDS and AML (Paietta, 2012). Studies of parenteral azacitidine, an epigenetic modifier, have shown efficacy in preventing post-transplant relapse in MDS and AML pts, and possibly reducing GvHD severity (Platzbecker, 2012; de Lima, 2010). Azacitidine maintenance after alloHSCT may enhance graft vs leukemia (GvL) effects and reduce GvHD by expansion of regulatory T cells (Goodyear, 2010, 2012). CC-486 is a novel oral formulation of azacitidine which, as well as potentially allowing easier administration over extended schedules, could increase the duration of drug exposure to residual malignant cells. We now report preliminary results from a prospective phase I/II dose-finding study of CC-486 as maintenance Tx after alloHSCT in pts with MDS or AML. Objective: To evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety outcomes of CC-486 following alloHSCT in pts with MDS or AML. Methods: Pts with WHO-defined MDS or AML who have undergone alloHSCT with myeloablative (MAC) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens and who had sibling or unrelated donors with ≤1 antigen mismatch at the HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1 or -DQB1 locus, are enrolled. CC-486 Tx is initiated between days (d) 42 and 84 after alloHSCT. Pts receive prophylactic Tx for GvHD and infections per institutional standard. A standard 3x3 MTD design is being used to evaluate 4 dosing schedules: CC-486 200 mg or 300 mg QD, administered for 7 d (Cohorts 1 and 2) or 14 d (Cohorts 3 and 4) of repeated 28d Tx cycles. MTD determination is based on DLT that occur during the first 2 Tx cycles (pts are not evaluable if unable to complete 2 Tx cycles for reasons other than a DLT). Adverse events (AEs) are graded using NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Pts are followed for safety, incidence of acute and chronic GvHD, and relapse. PK of azacitidine after CC-486 administration, alone or with standard concomitant medications, are evaluated on d 1 of CC-486 Tx cycles 1 and 2. Results: At data cut-off (7/17/2014), outcome data were available for 7 pts enrolled in the first 2 cohorts (Table): 1 pt had IPSS Int-2 MDS and 6 had AML with high-risk features. Stem cell source was from bone marrow (n=2) or peripheral blood (n=5) from unrelated (n=5) or sibling (n=2) donors. Two pts had 1 antigen mismatch and 5 had a full match.Conditioning included MAC (n=3) and RIC (n=4) regimens. One pt in Cohort 2 was not evaluable for DLT or PK assessments due to early discontinuation (AML relapse) during the first CC-486 Tx cycle. Of the 6 evaluable pts, 4 completed ≥6 CC-486 Tx cycles and 2 ongoing pts had not reached 6 cycles on-study at data cut-off (Table). One pt who had GvHD before CC-486 Tx subsequently withdrew from the study after developing febrile neutropenia and diarrhea related to GvHD of the bowel; 1 pt withdrew for personal reasons; and 1 pt discontinued after 6 Tx cycles due to relapse. At data cut-off, 3 pts remained on-study, all with continued CR (Table). No pt in Cohort 2 developed GvHD. For all pts, most AEs were grade 1-2. Grade 3-4 AEs were reported for 2 pts: both had nausea and vomiting, which were controlled with antiemetic agents upon onset; 1 also had device-related infection and dyspnea, and 1 also had febrile neutropenia and rash. No DLT emerged with these CC-486 regimens and no pt experienced secondary graft failure. Overall azacitidine plasma concentration profiles (Figure) and PK parameters were similar following CC-486 given alone or with concomitant medications, and were within range of values observed following similar CC-486 doses in pts with MDS, CMML, and AML (Garcia-Manero, 2011). The AUC range for oral CC-486 is ~10% of that seen with subcutaneous azacitidine administered at 75 mg/m2 (Garcia-Manero, 2011). Conclusion: Preliminary data from this analysis suggest that CC-486 administered at doses of 200 or 300 mg QD for 7 days every 4 weeks is safe and well tolerated in the post-transplant setting. Overall, azacitidine plasma concentration profiles and PK parameters were not affected by use of concomitant medications. No DLT and a low rate of GvHD support the ongoing evaluation of 14d extended CC-486 dosing regimens in this ongoing study, as a preliminary to a prospective, randomized trial of this new agent post-transplant. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures de Lima: Celgene: Consultancy. Champlin:Celgene: Consultancy. Giralt:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Scott:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hetzer:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Laille:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skikne:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Craddock:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Treatment with Anti-CD19 BiTE® Blinatumomab in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (r/r ALL) Post-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.861.861 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 861-861 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Anthony Selwyn Stein ◽

Max S. Topp ◽

Hagop M Kantarjian ◽

Nicola Goekbuget ◽

Ralf C Bargou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Salvage Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Current therapies for patients with r/r ALL who have had prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) have very poor outcomes. Improvements in the therapeutic options available for adult r/r ALL are required. Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct that redirects cytotoxic T cells to lyse CD19-positive B cells. The aim of the present analysis was to characterize a subset of patients with r/r ALL and prior alloHSCT before treatment with blinatumomab from a large confirmatory open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase 2 study (Topp MS et al Lancet Oncol 2015;16(1):57-66). Methods: Eligible patients (≥18 years) had Philadelphia chromosome-negative r/r ALL with 1 of the following negative prognostic factors: primary refractory, first relapse within 12 months of first remission, relapse within 12 months of alloHSCT, or second or greater salvage. Patients with active acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) were excluded. Patients were required to stop all immunosuppressive GvHD therapy within 2 weeks before starting blinatumomab. A total of 189 patients were enrolled and received blinatumomab by continuous intravenous infusion (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) for up to 5 cycles. The primary endpoint was complete remission or complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CR/CRh) within the first 2 cycles. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and adverse events (AEs). Results: 64 (34%) patients had received alloHSCT before study enrollment; 10 patients had 2 prior alloHSCTs. Donor types primarily included 29 (45%) matched sibling and 31 (48%) unrelated, with 34 (59%) patients receiving myeloablative conditioning regimens (donor chimerism data were unavailable). Among those with prior alloHSCT, median age (range) was 32 (19-74) years. At baseline, 23 (36%) patients had 1 prior relapse, 24 (38%) had 2 prior relapses, and 17 (27%) had ≥3 prior relapses; 28 (44%) patients had relapsed post-alloHSCT. Of the 55 patients who had received previous salvage therapy, 38 (69%) had received salvage therapy after last alloHSCT and prior to blinatumomab. Median time (range) between the last alloHSCT and subsequent relapse was 6 (1-33) months. Median time from last prior alloHSCT to first dose of blinatumomab was 10 (3-40) months. Nineteen (30%) patients had a history of GvHD, and 42 (66%) had ≥50% bone marrow blasts at start of treatment as assessed by a central laboratory. Patients received blinatumomab for a median of 2 (1-5) cycles. Efficacy data are presented in Table 1. Overall, 45% (29/64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 33-58) of patients achieved CR/CRh within the first 2 cycles, with similar rates of remission also observed in the alloHSCT-naïve (42%; 52/125) group. With a median follow-up of 8.8 months, median (95% CI) OS was 8.4 (4.2-9.4) months for the 64 patients with prior alloHSCT treated with blinatumomab. Of the 29 responders (CR, n=18 and CRh, n=11), 22 (76%) had a minimal residual disease (MRD) response and 19 (66%) achieved a complete MRD response. Median RFS (95% CI) was 6.1 (5.0-7.7) months. 9/29 (31%) responders subsequently underwent another alloHSCT. In total, 56 (88%) patients had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs, with the most frequent including neutropenia (22%), febrile neutropenia (20%), anemia (17%), and thrombocytopenia (14%). Six patients reported treatment-emergent GvHD (two grade ≥ 3) during blinatumomab treatment, 3 of whom had GvHD in skin. Eight patients had fatal treatment-emergent AEs, which included 1 due to gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 1 due to respiratory failure, and 6 due to infection/infestation; 1 of these (candida infection) was considered to be possibly related to treatment by the investigator. Of the subjects who had treatment-emergent fatal AEs, none were in remission at the time of death. Summary: In this heavily pretreated group of patients with r/r ALL and prior alloHSCT, single-agent blinatumomab was able to induce a CR/CRh rate of 45%, with an AE profile consistent with that previously reported. Post-alloHSCT patients who had relapsed performed equally as well as those without prior alloHSCT. To prolong remission in this poor outcome patient group, the addition of other immunotherapies to the treatment regimen may be considered for future investigations. Disclosures Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Topp:Astra: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support; Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support. Goekbuget:Erytech: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Equity Ownership; Sanofi: Equity Ownership; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Eusapharma/Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SigmaTau: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Bargou:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: Patent for blinatumomab; University of Wuerzburg, Germany: Employment; GEMoaB GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rambaldi:Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria. Zhang:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zimmerman:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Forman:Mustang: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Antibody Drug Conjugates Targeted to CD45 or CD117 Enable Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Animal Models

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-119432 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3324-3324

Author(s):

Rahul Palchaudhuri ◽

Sharon L. Hyzy ◽

Jennifer L Proctor ◽

Hillary L Adams ◽

Bradley R Pearse ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Antibody Drug Conjugates ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Donor Chimerism ◽

Drug Conjugates ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Antibody Drug

Abstract Introduction Targeted antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) to mouse CD45 or mouse CD117 have recently been shown to effectively prepare immunocompetent mice for whole bone marrow transplants (Palchaudhuri et al. Nature Biotech 2016 34:738-745; and Czechowicz et al. Blood 2016 128:493). This new targeted approach to conditioning using ADCs has the potential to expand the utility of transplantation if it can be successfully translated to humans. The anti-CD45 or anti-CD117 antibodies used previously were coupled to saporin (SAP), a ribosome-inhibiting protein, which once internalized elicits cytotoxicity in a cell cycle-independent manner. Both anti-CD45-saporin (CD45-SAP) and anti-CD117-saporin (CD117-SAP) ADCs have been shown to effectively deplete bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) as single dosed agents, creating vacancies that enable efficient autologous HSC engraftment (>95% long-term donor chimerism). Results To further investigate and develop the utility of these tool ADCs in murine transplant models, we explored CD45-SAP (1.9 mg/kg, iv) and CD117-SAP (1 mg/kg, iv) in an allogeneic minor mismatch transplant model (Balb/c donor into DBA/2 recipients). The ADCs were used alone or in combination with an additional immune depleting agent, clone 30F11 (25 mg/kg, IP), a naked anti-CD45 antibody that mimics ATG by relying on effector function to enable potent peripheral B- and T -cell depletion. In addition to the lymphodepleting antibody, we included post-transplant Cytoxan (200 mg/kg, IP) to prevent GvHD. To compare the CD45-SAP and CD117-SAP to conventional conditioning methods, we investigated sub-lethal total body irradiation (TBI, 2Gy) or pre-transplant Cytoxan (200 mg/kg, IP) in combination with the immunosuppressants. Conditioned mice were transplanted with 2x107 whole bone marrow cells, and chimerism assessed over 12 weeks. CD45-SAP or CD117-SAP in combination with immunosuppressants (30F11 and post-transplant Cytoxan) enabled >85% peripheral donor chimerism at 12 weeks post-transplantation. Multilineage reconstitution was observed in the T-, B- and myeloid cell compartments with >80%, >90% and >90% donor chimerism respectively in both CD45-SAP and CD117-SAP groups. In contrast, 2Gy TBI in combination with immunosuppressants (30F11 and post-transplant Cytoxan) resulted in only 5% donor engraftment. Multi-dosing with 30F11 (QDx3) plus 2Gy TBI and post-transplant Cytoxan increased the peripheral donor chimerism to 40%. Pre-transplant Cytoxan plus 30F11 (QDx3) and post-transplant Cytoxan yielded 20% donor chimerism. For all groups, stem cell chimerism in the bone marrow matched the peripheral chimerism. Conclusion These results indicate anti-CD45 or anti-CD117 ADCs may be used in combination with immunosuppression to enable highly efficient allogeneic transplants in a minor mismatch model (>85% donor chimerism). CD45-SAP and CD117-SAP were more effective at conditioning versus 2Gy TBI or pre-transplant Cytoxan. Future experiments will investigate anti-CD45 and anti-CD117 ADCs in additional allogeneic models. Disclosures Palchaudhuri: Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Harvard University: Patents & Royalties. Hyzy:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Proctor:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Adams:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pearse:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Sarma:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Aslanian:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gillard:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lamothe:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Burenkova:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brooks:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gabros:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. McDonagh:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Boitano:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Cooke:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Phase 2 Results Demonstrate Engraftment with Minimal Neutropenia with MGTA-456, a CD34+ Expanded Cord Blood (CB) Product in Patients Transplanted for Inherited Metabolic Disorders (IMD)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-115102 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3467-3467

Author(s):

Paul Orchard ◽

Glen D. Raffel ◽

Carolyn H Condon ◽

Catherine A Monaghan ◽

Demetra Vernet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Graft Failure ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Historical Cohort ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: IMDs including mucopolysaccharidosis type IH (MPS1/Hurler Syndrome), metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD), globoid cell leukodystrophy (GLD) and cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy (cALD) are progressive, fatal diseases affecting the central nervous system which are treatable through allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). CB, in the absence of a matched donor, is the preferred source of stem cells as it is rapidly available and allows greater flexibility in allele matching. As a result of low cell doses, CB transplants in IMD are associated with prolonged periods of neutropenia and reported graft failure rates in up to ~20% (Lum et al 2017 Bone Marrow Transplant 52:846-53; Mallhi et al 2017 BBMT 23:119-25). MGTA-456 is a first-in-class cell therapy produced from a single CB unit using an aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonist in a 15-day expansion culture of CD34+ cells. In previous phase 1/2 studies, 24 adult and 3 pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies treated with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and MGTA-456 demonstrated a median 324-fold expansion of CD34+ cells, all patients engrafted, and the time to neutrophil recovery was significantly reduced by a median of 9 days compared to historical controls (Wagner et al 2016 Cell Stem Cell 18:144-55; Wagner et al 2017 Blood 130 supp:662 abstr). Furthermore, higher CD34+ dose has been correlated with improved engraftment and outcomes in IMD transplant patients (Prasad et al 2008 Blood 112:2979-89). Based on these promising data, we postulate the increased CD34+ dose provided by MGTA-456 would reduce the length of neutropenia and risk of graft failure in IMD patients. Patients and Methods: A Phase 2, open-label trial (NCT03406962) initiated in Feb 2018 is enrolling up to ~12 patients <16 yo with a diagnosis of MPS1, cALD, MLD, and GLD lacking a non-carrier matched related donor. Eligible CB units were matched at ≥ 6 of 8 HLA loci (A, B, C and DRB1) using allele-based typing. The reduced toxicity MAC regimen consists of anti-thymocyte globulin (days -9 to -6) followed by fludarabine (40 mg/m2 days -5 to -2) and busulfan (total exposure 21,000 to 22,000 μM/min/L-1 days -5 to -2). Immunoprophylaxis consists of cyclosporin and methylprednisolone. Results: Four patients have been treated thus far (Table 1). The MGTA-456 process provided a marked expansion of CD34+ cells (median 482-fold, Figure 1) with a median infused CD34+ cell dose of 84 x 106 cells/kg and median total nucleated cell (TNC) dose from the expanded fraction of 19.6 x 107 (Table 1). TNC dosing was capped at 27.0 x 107 cells/kg per protocol. The only infusion-related reaction noted was grade 3 nausea in 1 patient. Two patients had no days of neutropenia and 2 patients had 1 and 4 days respectively (mean 1.25 days) in contrast to a mean of 7.8 days for a historical cohort of 27 IMD patients undergoing CB transplantation at the same institution with identical conditioning (Figure 2). Myeloid chimerism (CD33+/66+) achieved ≥98% donor by day +14 in all patients. For the 3 patients with data at time of reporting, days to discharge after transplant were 17, 12 and 18. No patients experienced acute or chronic GVHD. One patient developed autoimmune cytopenia (not related to MGTA-456) which is a known complication reported in 20-56% of IMD patients undergoing HSCT that resulted in death at day +143 (Page et al 2008 BBMT 14:1108-17; Khalil et al 2014 Sci World J 581657). Long-term disease specific outcome measures including enzymatic activity are being collected and will be reported over time. Conclusions: Preliminary results of transplantation in IMD patients with MGTA-456, containing highly expanded CD34+ cell doses, demonstrated early and robust engraftment in all patients with marked reduction in days of neutropenia (to 0-4 days or mean 1.25 days) in comparison to a historical cohort. MGTA-456 was well tolerated with one infusion-related event of grade 3 nausea. These data, in combination with the previous 27 hematologic malignancy patients treated, suggest that MGTA-456 substantially enhances the engraftment potential of CB. Based on these promising data, MGTA-456 has potential to improve transplant-related outcomes in patients undergoing HSCT and increasing the availability of well-matched CB units that may have been previously excluded due to inadequate CD34+ dose. Disclosures Orchard: Magenta Therapeutics: Research Funding. Raffel:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Condon:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Monaghan:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vernet:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment. Sheirr:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Braun:Magenta Therapeutics: Research Funding. Shanley:Magenta Therapeutics: Research Funding. Lund:Magenta Therapeutics: Research Funding. Boitano:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Cooke:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Davis:Magenta Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wagner:Novartis: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Chemo-Mobilization Provides Superior Mobilization and Collection in Autologous Stem Cell Transplants but with Less Predictability and At a Higher Cost,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.4048.4048 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 4048-4048 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Nelson J. Chao ◽

Daniel T Grima ◽

George Carrum ◽

Leona Holmberg ◽

Henry C. Fung ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Resource Use ◽

Research Funding ◽

Unit Cost ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 4048 Introduction: Chemotherapy + GCSF mobilization and GCSF alone are the most common mobilization regimens for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). We examined the benefits and limitations of both regimens in terms of mobilization success, predictability and costs. Methods: A retrospective, multi-center chart review was conducted of multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma patients mobilized between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007 for ASCT. Patients were excluded if they were mobilized with plerixafor (Mozobil®) or enrolled in a clinical trial of mobilization regimens. Data collected included demographics, disease and treatment history, mobilization regimen, blood counts, aphaeresis, remobilization, cells transplanted, time to engraftment and resource use. Stem cell collection practices and related clinical outcomes were analyzed separately for patients that were mobilized with chemotherapy + GCSF vs. GCSF alone. Resource use was evaluated using US unit cost data. Results: Data were collected for 227 consecutive patients from 11 centers (143 patients that received a chemotherapy + GCSF mobilization regimen and 84 patients who received GCSF alone). Total cells collected were significantly higher in the chemotherapy + GCSF mobilization group compared to GSF alone (18.6 × 106/kg vs.7.0 × 106/kg, p<0.001). While chemotherapy mobilization resulted in fewer days of aphaeresis (2.0 vs. 2.9; p<0.001), it was also associated with longer time to aphaeresis (12.5 days vs. 4.2 days; p<0.001), greater resource use and higher rates of febrile neutropenia. The chemotherapy + GCSF mobilization group had fewer re-mobilizations compared to GCSF alone (1.06 mobilizations vs. 1.2; p=0.016, 4.2% of chemotherapy + GCSF patients had more than one mobilization compared to 16.7% in GCSF alone). Even with fewer aphaeresis days and re-mobilizations, the cost total cost of mobilization, remobilization and aphaeresis with chemotherapy + GCSF was higher than GCSF alone ($19,614 vs. 16,852; p=0.003). Higher chemotherapy + GCSF costs were driven by the costs of chemotherapy, and extra days of GCSF. Chemotherapy + GCSF was also harder to predict in terms of timing the first day of aphaeresis. In patients receiving GCSF alone, the majority (95%) of first day aphaeresis occurred between Monday and Wednesday with the remaining 5% occurring on a Thursday or Friday. In contrast, chemotherapy + GCSF mobilizations resulted in 74.1% of first day aphaeresis occurring between Monday and Wednesday, 12.6% on Thursday and Friday and a further 13.3% occurring on a Saturday or Sunday. Discussion: Significant differences in mobilization success, costs and predictability were observed between patients that received chemotherapy + GCSF and those that received GCSF alone. While a chemotherapy + GCSF mobilization regimen may provide better mobilization and collection, there is a trade-off in terms of predictability, time to collection, costs and rate of febrile neutropenia. However, as chemotherapy + GCSF may be used for the treatment of the underlying malignancy; its use may not be completely comparable to GCSF mobilization alone. Disclosures: Grima: Cornerstone Research Group Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Holmberg:Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Fung:Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Brown:Cornerstone Research: Employment. Horwitz:Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bernard:Cornerstone Research: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shaughnessy:Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Following Anti-CD19 BiTE® Blinatumomab in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.965.965 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 965-965 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Anthony Stein ◽

Max S. Topp ◽

Nicola Goekbuget ◽

Ralf C. Bargou ◽

Hervé Dombret ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Improvements in the therapeutic options available for adult relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-precursor ALL are required. Blinatumomab is an investigational bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct that redirects cytotoxic T cells to lyse CD19-positive B cells. Based on encouraging clinical data from a small phase 2 study (Topp MS et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15s): abstract 7005), we conducted a large confirmatory open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase 2 study of blinatumomab in patients with r/r B-precursor ALL. The aim of the present analysis from this phase 2 study was to characterize those patients who proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after achieving complete remission (CR)/complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh*) with blinatumomab treatment. Methods: Eligible patients (≥18 years) had Philadelphia chromosome-negative r/r B-precursor ALL with one of the following negative prognostic factors: primary refractory, 1st relapse within 12 months of 1st remission, relapse within 12 months of HSCT, or ≥2nd salvage. Blinatumomab was given by continuous IV infusion (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) for up to 5 cycles. The primary endpoint was CR/CRh* within the first 2 cycles. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), HSCT realization rate, 100-day mortality following HSCT, and adverse events. Results: 189 patients with a median age (range) of 39 (18‒79) years were enrolled and received blinatumomab for a median (range) of 2 (1‒5) cycles. At enrollment, 74 (39%) patients had received ≥2 prior salvage therapies, 64 (34%) had received prior HSCT, and 105 (56%) had ≥75% bone marrow blasts. 43% (81/189) of patients achieved CR/CRh* within 2 cycles, with similar rates of remission observed in both the HSCT-naïve (42%; 52/125) and prior HSCT (45%; 29/64) groups. In total, 32/81 responders (CR, n=28 and CRh*, n=4) underwent HSCT during blinatumomab-induced remission, yielding a transplantation realization rate for blinatumomab responders of 40% (Table 1). 52% (27/52) of the HSCT-naïve patients and 17% (5/29) of patients who had received prior HSCT proceeded to on-study HSCT during blinatumomab-induced remission. These 32 transplants occurred after a median of 2 (1-5) cycles of therapy, with 11 (34%) patients receiving myeloablative conditioning pre-HSCT, 12 (38%) reduced intensity conditioning, and 9 (28%) unknown regimens. Twenty-two (69%) patients used unrelated donors (stem cells derived from blood, n=11; bone marrow, n=6; cord blood, n=5), 7 (22%) used related donors including 6 siblings (blood, n=5; bone marrow, n=1) and 1 haploidentical mother (blood), with 3 (9%) donor types and stem cell sources unknown. Six patients achieving CR/CRh* after 2 cycles of blinatumomab underwent HSCT but were not included in the transplantation realization rate of 40% due to receiving subsequent antineoplastic therapy before HSCT conditioning (Table 1). Among the 43 patients who achieved CR/CRh* within 2 cycles of blinatumomab treatment but never reached HSCT, 20 (47%) had undergone prior HSCT, 7 (16%) were ≥65 years, and 2 (5%) were ≥65 years and had received prior HSCT (Table 1). Figure 1 Figure 1. At the time of the primary analysis (data cut-off in October 2013), with median follow-up of 9.8 months, median (95% CI) OS for the 189 blinatumomab-treated patients was 6.1 (4.2‒7.5) months. When censoring for HSCT, median OS was 5.1 (4.1‒7.1) months; although the medians are slightly different, the curves with and without HSCT censoring largely overlap. Median RFS was 5.9 months with and without censoring for HSCT. Nine patients died at any time after HSCT, with 5 deaths due to infection, 3 due to disease progression, and 1 due to graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Three of these deaths (2 infections and 1 GvHD) were within 100 days of HSCT. The 100-day post-HSCT mortality rate was 11%. Summary: This large phase 2 study demonstrated antileukemia activity of single-agent blinatumomab in heavily pretreated or aggressive r/r ALL, irrespective of prior HSCT. The data suggest that blinatumomab enables patients to reach HSCT, with 11% 100-day mortality post-HSCT. Two-thirds of patients who did not reach HSCT after responding to blinatumomab were either ≥65 years old or had received prior HSCT. Longer follow-up is required to assess the role of HSCT in patients achieving CR/CRh* after treatment with blinatumomab. Disclosures Stein: Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: This presentation will discuss the off-label use of blinatumomab, as this agent is not approved for use by the FDA, EMA or any other regulatory authorities.. Topp:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Goekbuget:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Bargou:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dombret:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Larson:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rambaldi:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy. Zugmaier:Amgen Reseach (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Jia:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Maniar:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huber:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Nagorsen:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Related to blinatumomab Patents & Royalties. Kantarjian:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Impact of Modified Thalidomide Dosing in Bortezomib/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Transplant-Eligible: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122775 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4739-4739

Author(s):

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽

Adrián Alegre ◽

Thierry Facon ◽

Cyrille Hulin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Indirect Comparison ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Post Induction ◽

Adjusted Indirect Comparison ◽

Equity Ownership

Introduction: For patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are transplant-eligible, bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTd) is a standard of care (SoC) for induction and consolidation therapy. Clinical practice has evolved to use a modified VTd dose (VTd-mod; 100 mg thalidomide daily), which is reflected in recent treatment guidelines. As VTd-mod has become a real-world SoC, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of the VTd-mod dose from recent clinical trials versus the dose included in the label (VTd-label; ramp up to 200 mg thalidomide daily) was performed to understand the effect on efficacy of modified VTd dosing for patients with NDMM who are transplant-eligible. Methods: For each outcome (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], overall response rates [ORR] post-induction and post-transplant, and rate of peripheral neuropathy), a naïve comparison and a MAIC were performed. Data for VTd-label were obtained from the phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study (Rosiñol L, et al. Blood. 2012;120[8]:1589-1596). Data for VTd-mod were pooled from the phase 3 CASSIOPEIA study (Moreau P, et al. Lancet. 2019;394[10192]:29-38) and the phase 2 NCT00531453 study (Ludwig H, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31[2]:247-255). Patient-level data for PETHEMA/GEM and CASSIOPEIA were used to generate outcomes of interest and were validated against their respective clinical study reports; aggregate data for NCT00531453 were extracted from the primary publication. Matched baseline characteristics were age, sex, ECOG performance status, myeloma type, International Staging System (ISS) stage, baseline creatinine clearance, hemoglobin level, and platelet count. Results: Patients received VTd-mod (n = 591) or VTd-label (n = 130). After matching, baseline characteristics were similar across groups. For OS, the naïve comparison and the MAIC showed that VTd-mod was non-inferior to VTd-label (MAIC HR, 0.640 [95% CI: 0.363-1.129], P = 0.121; Figure 1A). VTd-mod significantly improved PFS versus VTd-label in the naïve comparison and MAIC (MAIC HR, 0.672 [95% CI: 0.467-0.966], P = 0.031; Figure 1B). Post-induction ORR was non-inferior for VTd-mod versus VTd-label (MAIC odds ratio, 1.781 [95% CI: 1.004-3.16], P = 0.065). Post-transplant, VTd-mod demonstrated superior ORR in both the naïve comparison and MAIC (MAIC odds ratio, 2.661 [95% CI: 1.579-4.484], P = 0.001). For rates of grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy, the naïve comparison and MAIC both demonstrated that VTd-mod was non-inferior to VTd-label (MAIC rate difference, 2.4 [⁻1.7-6.49], P = 0.409). Conclusions: As naïve, indirect comparisons are prone to bias due to patient heterogeneity between studies, a MAIC can provide useful insights for clinicians and reimbursement decision-makers regarding the relative efficacy and safety of different treatments. In this MAIC, non-inferiority of VTd-mod versus VTd-label was demonstrated for OS, post-induction ORR, and peripheral neuropathy. This analysis also showed that VTd-mod significantly improved PFS and ORR post-transplant compared with VTd-label for patients with NDMM who are transplant-eligible. A limitation of this analysis is that unreported or unobserved confounding factors could not be adjusted for. Disclosures Sonneveld: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; SkylineDx: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mateos:Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Adaptive: Honoraria; AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Biotech Inc, Mundipharma EDO, PharmaMar, Roche Laboratories Inc, Takeda Oncology: Other: Advisory Committee; Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, GSK, Abbvie, EDO, Pharmar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Takeda Oncology.: Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc, Janssen Biotech Inc: Other: Data and Monitoring Committee. Alegre:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Facon:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hulin:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen, AbbVie, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria. Hashim:Ingress-Health: Employment. Vincken:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kampfenkel:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cote:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Role of Remission Status and Prior Transplant in Optimizing Survival Outcomes Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Transplantation (HSCT) in Patients Who Received Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (INO) for Relapsed / Refractory (R/R) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v130.suppl_1.886.886 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽

pp. 886-886

Author(s):

Partow Kebriaei ◽

Matthias Stelljes ◽

Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽

Nicola Goekbuget ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Survival Probability ◽

Research Funding ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Allogeneic Hsct ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Attaining complete remission (CR) prior to HSCT is associated with better outcomes post-HSCT. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), an anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, has shown significantly higher remission rates (CR/CRi and MRD negativity) compared with standard chemotherapy (SC) in patients (pts) with R/R ALL (Kantarjian et al. N Engl J Med. 2016). Pts treated with INO were more likely to proceed to HSCT than SC, which allowed for a higher 2-yr probability of overall survival (OS) than patients receiving SC (39% vs 29%). We investigated the role of prior transplant and proceeding directly to HSCT after attaining remission from INO administration as potential factors in determining post-HSCT survival to inform when best to use INO in R/R ALL patients. Methods: The analysis population consisted of R/R ALL pts who were enrolled and treated with INO and proceeded to allogeneic HSCT as part of two clinical trials: Study 1010 is a Phase 1/2 trial (NCT01363297), while Study 1022 is the pivotal randomized Phase 3 (NCT01564784) trial. Full details of methods for both studies have been previously published (DeAngelo et al. Blood Adv. 2017). All reference to OS pertains to post-HSCT survival defined as time from HSCT to death from any cause. Results: As of March 2016, out of 236 pts administered INO in the two studies (Study 1010, n=72; Study 1022, n=164), 101 (43%) proceeded to allogeneic HSCT and were included in this analysis. Median age was 37 y (range 20-71) with 55% males. The majority of pts received INO as first salvage treatment (62%) and 85% had no prior SCT. Most pts received matched HSCTs (related = 25%; unrelated = 45%) with peripheral blood as the predominant cell source (62%). The conditioning regimens were mainly myeloablative regimens (60%) and predominantly TBI-based (62%). Dual alkylators were used in 13% of pts, while thiotepa was used in 8%. The Figure shows post-transplant survival in the different INO populations: The median OS post-HSCT for all pts (n=101) who received INO and proceeded to HSCT was 9.2 mos with a 2-yr survival probability of 41% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31-51%). In patients with first HSCT (n=86) the median OS post-HSCT was 11.8 mos with a 2-yr survival probability of 46% (95% CI 35-56%). Of note, some patients lost CR while waiting for HSCT and had to receive additional treatments before proceeding to HSCT (n=28). Those pts who went directly to first HSCT after attaining remission with no intervening additional treatment (n=73) fared best, with median OS post-HSCT not reached with a 2-yr survival probability of 51% (95% CI 39-62%). In the latter group, 59/73 (80%) attained MRD negativity, and 49/73 (67%) were in first salvage therapy. Of note, the post-HSCT 100-day survival probability was similar among the 3 groups, as shown in the Table. Multivariate analyses using Cox regression modelling confirmed that MRD negativity during INO treatment and no prior HSCT were associated with lower risk of mortality post-HSCT. Other prognostic factors associated with worse OS included older age, higher baseline LDH, higher last bilirubin measurement prior to HSCT, and use of thiotepa. Veno-occlusive disease post-transplant was noted in 19 of the 101 pts who received INO. Conclusion: Administration of INO in R/R ALL pts followed with allogeneic HSCT provided the best long-term survival benefit among those who went directly to HSCT after attaining remission and had no prior HSCT. Disclosures DeAngelo: Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria; Pfizer Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immunogen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian: Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Delta-Fly Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Advani: Takeda/ Millenium: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Merchant: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stock: Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wang: Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang: Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Loberiza: Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vandendries: Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Marks: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Increased Early Mortality after Fludarabine and Melphalan Conditioning with Peripheral Blood Grafts in Haploidentical SCT with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129872 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4496-4496 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Luke Eastburg ◽

David A. Russler-Germain ◽

Ramzi Abboud ◽

Peter Westervelt ◽

John F. DiPersio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Stem Cell ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Early Mortality ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Equity Ownership

The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in the context of haploidentical stem cell transplant (haplo-SCT) has led to drastically reduced rates of Graft-vs-Host (GvH) disease through selective depletion of highly allo-reactive donor T-cells. Early trials utilized a reduced-intensity Flu/Cy/TBI preparative regimen and bone marrow grafts; however, relapse rates remained relatively high (Luznik et al. BBMT. 2008). This led to the increased use of myeloablative (MA) regimens for haplo-SCT, which have been associated with decreased relapse rates (Bashey et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013). Most studies have used a MA total body irradiation (TBI) based regimen for haplo-SCT. Preparative regimens using fludarabine and melphalan (FluMel), with or without thiotepa, ATG, and/or low dose TBI have also been reported using bone marrow grafts. Reports on the safety and toxicity of FluMel in the haplo-SCT setting with PTCy and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts are lacking. In this two-center retrospective analysis, the safety/toxicity of FluMel as conditioning for haplo-SCT was evaluated. We report increased early mortality and toxicity using standard FluMel conditioning and PBSC grafts for patients undergoing haplo-SCT with PTCy. 38 patients at the University of Rochester Medical Center and the Washington University School of Medicine underwent haplo-SCT with FluMel conditioning and PBSC grafts between 2015-2019. Outcomes were measured by retrospective chart review through July 2019. 34 patients (89.5%) received FluMel(140 mg/m2). Two patients received FluMel(100 mg/m2) and two patients received FluMel(140 mg/m2) + ATG. The median age at time of haplo-SCT was 60 years (range 21-73). 20 patients were transplanted for AML, eight for MDS, two for PMF, two for NHL, and five for other malignancies. The median Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) score was 4 (≥3 indicates high risk). 11 patients had a history of prior stem cell transplant, and 16 patients had active disease prior to their haplo-SCT. Seven patients had sex mismatch with their stem cell donor. Median donor age was 42 (range 21-71). 20 patient deaths occurred by July 2019 with a median follow up of 244 days for surviving patients. Nine patients died before day +100 (D100, "early mortality"), with a D100 non-relapse mortality (NRM) rate of 24%. Median overall and relapse free survival (OS and RFS, respectively) were 197 days (95% CI 142-not reached) and 180 days (95% CI 141-not reached), respectively, for the entire cohort. The 1 year OS and NRM were 29% and 50%. The incidence of grades 2-4cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 66%, and 52% of these patients were treated with tocilizumab. CRS was strongly associated with early mortality, with D100 NRM of 36% in patients with grade 2-4 CRS compared to 0% in those with grade 0-1. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was 64% in patients with grade 2-4 CRS, and 8% in those without (p < 0.001). 28% of patients with AKI required dialysis. Grade 2-4 CRS was seen in 54% of patients in remission prior to haplo-SCT and in 92% of those with active disease (p = 0.02). Of the 9 patients with early mortality, 89% had AKI, 44% needed dialysis, and 100% had grade 2-4 CRS, compared to 31%, 10%, and 55% in those without early mortality (p = 0.002, p = 0.02, p = 0.01). Early mortality was not significantly associated with age, HCT-CI score, second transplant, disease status at transplant, total dose of melphalan, volume overload/diuretic use, or post-transplant infection. In conclusion, we observed a very high rate of NRM with FluMel conditioning and PBSC grafts for haplo-SCT with PTCy. The pattern of toxicity was strongly associated with grade 2-4 CRS, AKI, and need for dialysis. These complications may be mediated by excessive inflammation in the context of allo-reactive donor T-cell over-activation. Consistent with this, multiple groups have shown that FluMel conditioning in haplo-SCT is safe when using bone marrow or T-cell depleted grafts. Based on our institutional experiences, we would discourage the use of FluMel as conditioning for haplo-SCT with PTCy with T-cell replete PBSC grafts. Alternative regimens or variations on melphalan-based regimens, such as fractionated melphalan dosing or inclusion of TBI may improve outcomes but further study and randomized controlled trials are needed. This study is limited in its retrospective design and sample size. Figure Disclosures DiPersio: WUGEN: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Cellworks Group, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NeoImmune Tech: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioline Rx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Macrogenics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; RiverVest Venture Partners Arch Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liesveld:Onconova: Other: Data safety monitoring board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Plerixafor (Mozobil ®)Plus G-CSF Is Effective in Mobilizing Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Patients with Concurrent Thrombocytopenia Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3229.3229 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3229-3229 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ivana N Micallef ◽

Eric Jacobsen ◽

Paul Shaughnessy ◽

Sachin Marulkar ◽

Purvi Mody ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Platelet Count ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Platelet Counts ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Low Platelet Count ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3229 Poster Board III-166 Introduction Low platelet count prior to mobilization is a significant predictive factor for mobilization failure in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD) undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (auto-HSCT; Hosing C, et al, Am J Hematol. 2009). The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of HSC mobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF in patients with concomitant thrombocytopenia undergoing auto-HSCT. Methods Patients who had failed successful HSC collection with any mobilization regimen were remobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF as part of a compassionate use program (CUP). Mobilization failure was defined as the inability to collect 2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg or inability to achieve a peripheral blood count of ≥10 CD34+ cells/μl without having undergone apheresis. As part of the CUP, G-CSF (10μg/kg) was administered subcutaneously (SC) every morning for 4 days. Plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg SC) was administered in the evening on Day 4, approximately 11 hours prior to the initiation of apheresis the following day. On Day 5, G-CSF was administered and apheresis was initiated. Plerixafor, G-CSF and apheresis were repeated daily until patients collected the minimum of 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for auto-HSCT. Patients in the CUP with available data on pre-mobilization platelet counts were included in this analysis. While patients with a platelet count <85 × 109/L were excluded from the CUP, some patients received waivers and were included in this analysis. Efficacy of remobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF was evaluated in patients with platelet counts ≤ 100 × 109/L or ≤ 150 × 109/L. Results Of the 833 patients in the plerixafor CUP database, pre-mobilization platelet counts were available for 219 patients (NHL=115, MM=66, HD=20 and other=18.). Of these, 92 patients (NHL=49, MM=25, HD=8 and other=10) had pre-mobilization platelet counts ≤ 150 × 109/L; the median platelet count was 115 × 109/L (range, 50-150). The median age was 60 years (range 20-76) and 60.4% of the patients were male. Fifty-nine patients (64.1%) collected ≥2 × 109 CD34+ cells/kg and 13 patients (14.1%) achieved ≥5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The median CD34+ cell yield was 2.56 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The proportion of patients proceeding to transplant was 68.5%. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days and 22 days, respectively. Similar results were obtained when efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF was evaluated in 29 patients with platelet counts ≤ 100 × 109/L (NHL=12, MM=10, HD=3 and other=4). The median platelet count in these patients was 83 × 109/L (range, 50-100). The median age was 59 years (range 23-73) and 60.4% of the patients were male. The minimal and optimal cell dose was achieved in 19(65.5%) and 3(10.3%) patients, respectively. The median CD34+ cell yield was 2.92 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The proportion of patients proceeding to transplant was 62.1%. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days and 23 days, respectively. Conclusions For patients mobilized with G-CSF alone or chemotherapy ±G-CSF, a low platelet count prior to mobilization is a significant predictor of mobilization failure. These data demonstrate that in patients with thrombocytopenia who have failed prior mobilization attempts, remobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF allows ∼65% of the patients to collect the minimal cell dose to proceed to transplantation. Thus, in patients predicted or proven to be poor mobilizers, addition of plerixafor may increase stem cell yields. Future studies should investigate the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF in front line mobilization in patients with low platelet counts prior to mobilization. Disclosures Micallef: Genzyme Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Jacobsen:Genzyme Corporation: Research Funding. Shaughnessy:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marulkar:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mody:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. van Rhee:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Clinic Staff Time and Labor Costs Associated with Administering Pegfilgrastim as Compared with Filgrastim to Patients Receiving Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy: Results of a Health Economic Model

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1515.1515 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1515-1515

Author(s):

Douglas C.A. Taylor ◽

Michelle Skornecki ◽

Gregory Hill ◽

Richard Barron ◽

Chris Anstead ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Opportunity Costs ◽

Labor Costs ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy ◽

Community Oncology ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Delivery Scheduling ◽

Delivery Models

Abstract Abstract 1515 Objective: Patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy are at risk for developing febrile neutropenia, a major dose-limiting toxicity of systemic chemotherapy. Prophylactic use of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF), such as filgrastim used daily for up to two weeks and pegfilgrastim used once per cycle, decreases the incidence of febrile neutropenia. Cancer delivery models are under pressure to become more efficient in an increasingly cost-restrictive environment. The use of growth factors to help prevent febrile neutropenia is well established, but little is known regarding the use of practice resources necessary to deliver therapy. The objective of this study was to construct an empirical model to calculate the human resource time and cost associated with delivery of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim. Methods: A practice-level model was constructed detailing staff tasks required for the administration of G-CSF on a monthly basis. Key model inputs include specific clinic characteristics, such as the number of patients treated with G-CSF, the number of filgrastim injections administered per cycle, and hourly pay rates for nurses and clerks. As described by Fortner et al (Community Oncology 2004, 1:23-28), interviews were conducted with 400 medical professionals at 20 US community oncology practices to provide data for the time required for the tasks involved in G-CSF delivery (scheduling, front desk, phlebotomy, laboratory, triage, injection, and billing). Model outputs were time expended for each staff type for administration of filgrastim or pegfilgrastim and corresponding labor costs. Costs for drug (filgrastim or pegfilgrastim), laboratory tests, and other materials were excluded from this model. The base-case scenarios contrasted 1 patient vs. 30 patients per month. Also examined were results for patients who received 11 injections of filgrastim per chemotherapy cycle, reflecting the mean number of injections received per cycle in the pegfilgrastim registrational clinical trials, and patients receiving 6 injections per cycle, as observed in current clinical practice. Using Bureau of Labor Statistics data, hourly pay rates were assumed to be $31.28 for nurses and $12.35 for clerks. Results: Table 1 displays monthly opportunity costs in hours and dollars of using once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim injection as compared with filgrastim given as either 6 or 11 injections per cycle. Alternate cost and time assumptions, with 95% confidence intervals for salary and time inputs, are shown in parentheses. Conclusions: The 30-patient model predicts monthly opportunity costs with pegfilgrastim as compared with filgrastim of 378 to 756 staff hours and between $9,000 and $18,000. On a per-patient basis, the monthly opportunity cost would be 13 to 25 staff hours and $300 to $600. Use of pegfilgrastim as compared with filgrastim is associated with substantial savings in time and labor costs. Future medical care delivery models should consider practice resource requirements as a means of increasing efficiency and cost effectiveness. Disclosures: Taylor: i3 Innovus: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Skornecki:i3 Innovus: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hill:i3 Innovus: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Barron:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Anstead:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fortner:P4 Healthcare: Employment. Ozer-Deniz:i3 Innovus: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text