A Phase 1b Study of Panobinostat in Combination with Idarubicin and Ara-C in Patients with High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2553-2553
Author(s):  
Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽  
Alison R. Walker ◽  
Richard F. Schlenk ◽  
Jorge Sierra ◽  
Bruno C. Medeiros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Advisory Role

Abstract Background: For patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with poor prognostic indicators, such as unfavorable cytogenetics or secondary AML, overall and event-free survival (EFS) rates are much worse, highlighting the critical need for more effective therapeutic modalities. Increasing evidence implicates epigenetic processes in the development of AML. Panobinostat (PAN), a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor, has been shown to augment the effects of standard chemotherapies (anthracyclines and Ara-C) in preclinical studies with AML cells. These preclinical results led to a phase 1b study of PAN in combination with idarubicin and Ara-C in pts with high-risk AML. Methods: The trial included younger pts (≥ 18 y and ≤ 65 y) with newly diagnosed high-risk AML, defined as: treatment-related AML, AML following previously diagnosed myelodysplasia or medical history of relevant hematologic disorders, and presence of unfavorable cytogenetics. The primary objective was determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of PAN when given in combination with idarubicin and Ara-C. Secondary objectives included safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK). Exploratory endpoints included assessment of the relationship between efficacy and PK parameters and 1-year EFS. The study examined escalating doses (15-25 mg) of PAN given 3 times per wk for 2 wk starting on day 8 of a 28-day cycle (ie, D8, D10, D12, D15, D17, D19) in combination with standard induction doses of idarubicin (12 mg/m2/d; D1-D3) and Ara-C (100 mg/m2/d; C1, D1-D7). After 2 cycles, pts achieving a complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) moved to a consolidation phase with a combination of high-dose Ara-C and PAN at the dose received during induction. After determination of the RP2D, additional pts were enrolled in the expansion phase and treated at the RP2D dose. Results: A total of 46 pts with a median age of 55.5 y (range, 19-65 y) were enrolled in the study (34 in the dose-escalation phase [15 mg, n = 11; 20 mg, n = 15; 25 mg, n = 8] and 12 in the dose-expansion phase). Seven dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the escalation phase: 4 of 12 pts in the 20-mg group (left ventricular systolic dysfunction [n = 2], hepatosplenic candidiasis [n = 1], increased QTCF [n = 1]) and 3 of 7 pts in the 25-mg group (febrile neutropenia [n = 2], grade 3 diarrhea [n = 1]). Based upon the Bayesian linear regression model, the upper limit (≤ 25% probability of excessive toxicity in > 33% of pts) was not reached for determination of MTD. The RP2D of PAN was 20 mg. Among the 27 pts treated at the RP2D, common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) regardless of causality were mainly hematologic, including febrile neutropenia (59.3%), thrombocytopenia (48.1%), and anemia (40.7%). Although most pts experienced gastrointestinal AEs, they were largely grade ≤ 2 (all grades, 74.1%; grade 3/4, 11.1%). AEs led to discontinuation in 15% of pts treated at the RP2D. Four pts (3 of 46 during induction and 1 of 19 during consolidation) treated with RP2D died during treatment. Of the on-treatment deaths, 1 (grade 4 sepsis) was potentially related to study drug, whereas the remaining 3 (progressive AML, ischemic stroke, and cerebral hemorrhage) were determined to be unrelated. The geometric mean AUC0-24 of PAN after oral dosing increased with increasing PAN dose (42.5 hr•ng/mL [15 mg], 62.6 hr•ng/mL [20 mg], and 74.6 hr•ng/mL [25 mg]). However, AUC0-24 was higher in the expansion phase (92.7 hr•ng/mL) than at 25 mg in the escalation phase, with high variability (coefficient of variation, 32.3% [expansion]; 45.5% [25-mg escalation]). Among pts treated at the RP2D, 44.4% and 11.1% achieved CR and CRi, respectively (CR/CRi, 56%). In the subset of pts in the RP2D, no relationship was found between AUC0-24 and response rates. In the overall population, the 1-year EFS rate was 78.3%. Conclusions: The data from this study showed high variability in PAN PK and largely overlapping exposure between dose levels. Overall, these data demonstrate a safety profile consistent with those of single-agent PAN and the combination of Ara-C and idarubicin. Disclosures DeAngelo: Incyte: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; Pfizer: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; Novartis: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; BMS: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Other: Consulting & Advisory Role; Amgen: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role. Schlenk:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Arog: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sierra:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Ocio:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Strickland:Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Steering Committee and Advisory Board Participation; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board Particpation; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board Particpation; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board Particpation; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Other: Advisory Board Particpation. Valera:Novartis: Employment. Wegener:Novartis: Employment. De:Novartis: Employment. Mu:Novartis: Employment. Binlich:Novartis: Employment. Stuart:Novartis: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase 1b Trial of Talazoparib and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Adult Patients with CD33+ Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4435-4435
Author(s):  
Mahesh Swaminathan ◽  
Amanda Przespolewski ◽  
Elizabeth A. Griffiths ◽  
James E. Thompson ◽  
Amro Elshoury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes are involved in repair of single-strand DNA breaks through base excision repair pathways. Inhibitors of PARP are approved for the treatment of BRCA1/2-mutant malignancies. We have previously demonstrated (Portwood et al, ASH 2019 abstract) that PARP inhibitors can synergistically enhance the activity of DNA-damaging agents in preclinical models of human acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Talazoparib (Tala) is a selective PARP inhibitor which exhibits potent inhibitory effects against multiple human AML cell lines. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is an CD33 antibody drug conjugate approved for treatment of patients (pts) with AML. We hypothesized that the combination of Tala + GO would result in improved efficacy as compared with the historical response of GO monotherapy in pts with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML. Study Design: This open-label multi-center phase 1b study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and preliminary response rates for Tala + GO in adult pts with CD33+ R/R AML. In the dose escalation portion, pts will be treated with Tala (dosed at 0.5, 0.75, or 1 mg orally daily) in combination with fixed dose GO (3 mg/m 2/day on days 1, 4, and 7, capped at one 4.5 mg vial) using a standard 3+3 design. The dose limiting toxicity (DLT) window is 28 days. After determination of DLTs and establishment of a recommended phase 2 dose, additional pts are planned for an expansion cohort. Results: This trial was activated in July 2020 and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04207190). As of August 2021, 6 pts have been enrolled, 3 each at Tala dose levels of 0.5 and 0.75 mg daily, respectively. Median age is 77 (range, 53-84) years with 3 (50%) women (Table 1). Median prior lines of therapy were 3 (range, 1-7), and 2 pts had received prior allogeneic transplant. Four pts had intermediate European LeukemiaNet risk disease at diagnosis. Five pts had next-generation sequencing at diagnosis (Table 1). One pt had p53 mutant AML (1/5, 20%), and two pts had FLT3 mutations (2/6,33%). To date, there have been no DLTs. The most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included elevated alanine transaminase, hyperbilirubinemia, hypocalcemia, diarrhea, and oral thrush (83% each) (Table 2). Grade ³3 hematological AEs were common and related to Tala + GO. These consisted of neutropenia (n=4, 67%), anemia (n=1, 17%), and thrombocytopenia (n=1, 17%). The most frequent non-hematological grade ³3 AEs were bacteremia (67%), sepsis (67%), febrile neutropenia (50%), and pneumonia (50%). All were considered unrelated to Tala (Table 2). Three pts (50%) achieved a best response of complete response with incomplete count recovery (CRi) after 2 cycles. Two of these 3 pts were dosed at Tala 0.5 mg oral daily. All 6 pts are currently off protocol. Two had no response after 2 cycles, 1 died from persistent diease, 1 had persistently elevated AST, 1 was pt choice, and 1 died of pneumonia/respiratory failure. To date, a protocol defined maximally tolerated dose (MTD) has not been identified. Conclusion: This open-label multi-center phase 1b study is evaluating the safety, tolerability, and preliminary response rates of Tala + GO in adult pts with relapsed/refractory CD33+ AML. To date, 6 pts have been enrolled at the first two dose levels (Tala 0.5 mg po daily + GO, Tala 0.75 mg po daily +GO). No DLTs or MTD have been identified. The overall response rate after 2 cycles of therapy was 50% (n=3, CRi). A recent protocol amendment was enacted to shorten the duration of Tala treatment from continuous (28 out of 28 day) dosing to 21 out of 28 day dosing per cycle. Accrual is ongoing with plans to open this trial at two other centers in 2022. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Przespolewski: Jazz: Research Funding. Griffiths: Taiho Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Thompson: Novartis/ Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Elshoury: Bristol Meyers Squibb: Other: advisory board. Wang: AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kura Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, steering committee, Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; DAVA Oncology: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data safety monitoring committee; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Genentech: Consultancy; MacroGenics: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in an 1869-Patient Cohort of JUMP: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Expanded-Access Study in Patients with Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2799-2799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Tavares ◽  
Giuseppe A. Palumbo ◽  
Philipp Le Coutre ◽  
Francesca Palandri ◽  
Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Costal Margin ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Expanded Access ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib (RUX) is a potent JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor that demonstrated improvements in splenomegaly and disease-related symptoms, as well as improved survival, in patients (pts) with intermediate (Int)-2- or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF), and has proved superior to placebo and best available therapy in the phase 3 COMFORT studies. JUMP is an expanded-access phase 3b trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of RUX in pts with MF and includes patients with no access to RUX outside a clinical trial. As of Dec 2014, final enrollment was 2233 pts in 26 countries. METHODS: Eligible pts had Int-2- or high-risk MF with or without splenomegaly, or Int-1-risk MF with a palpable spleen (≥ 5 cm from the costal margin). Pts received starting doses of RUX based on platelet counts at baseline (5 mg twice daily [bid; ≥ 50 to < 100 × 109/L], 15 mg bid [100 to 200 × 109/L], or 20 mg bid [> 200 × 109/L]). The primary endpoint was assessment of safety and tolerability of RUX. Additional analyses included changes in palpable spleen length and symptom scores as measured by the FACT-Lymphoma total score (FACT-Lym TS). The final analysis will be performed after all pts have completed 24 months of treatment or discontinued the study. RESULTS: This analysis includes 1869 pts (primary MF, 59.1%; n = 1105) who started treatment ≥ 1 year before the data cutoff date (01 Jan 2015). At baseline, median age was 67 y (range, 18-89 y); 54.1% were male; median palpable spleen length was 12 cm below the costal margin; 87 pts did not have splenomegaly. Median hemoglobin (Hb) was 106 g/L, and 38.9% of pts had Hb levels ˂ 100 g/L; median platelet count was 257 × 109/L; mean FACT-Lym TS and FACIT-Fatigue score were 113.7 and 33.2, respectively. At data cutoff, 37.0% of pts remained on treatment; 26.1% had completed treatment per protocol. Primary reasons for discontinuation included adverse events (AEs; 17.4%), disease progression (8.2%), and death (3.4%). Median exposure was 13.6 months; the median average daily dose was 36.7 mg for pts starting at 20 mg bid (n = 1168; 62.5%) and 23.2 mg for pts starting at 15 mg bid (n = 559; 29.9%). The majority of pts (66.0%) had dose modifications, and 26.2% had a dose interruption. Grade 3/4 hematologic AEs included anemia (34.0%), thrombocytopenia (14.9%), and neutropenia (3.9%), which led to discontinuation in 2.2%, 3.3%, and 0.2% of pts, respectively. The most common nonhematologic AEs (≥ 10%) were pyrexia (14.5%), asthenia (13.8%), diarrhea (12.4%), and fatigue (10.3%), and were primarily grade 1/2; grade 3/4 AEs were low overall (≤ 2%), except pneumonia (3.9%), which led to discontinuation in 9 pts (0.5%). Rates of infections were low; all-grade infections ≥ 5% included pneumonia (6.2%), urinary tract infection (5.7%), and nasopharyngitis (5.3%). Tuberculosis was reported in 5 pts (0.3%; grade 3/4, 0.1%); hepatitis B was reported in 1 pt (0.1%; grade 3/4, 0.1%). At wk 24 and 48, 57.2% (742/1297) and 62.0% (588/949) of pts with baseline splenomegaly achieved a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in palpable spleen length; 22.9% (297/1297) and 19.0% (180/949) had 25% to 50% reductions, respectively. Most pts (70.5%; 1208/1713) experienced a ≥ 50% reduction at any time; 23.3% (399/1713) had complete resolution of splenomegaly (Figure). At wk 24 and 48, 96.6% (57/59) and 91.5% (43/47) of evaluable pts without splenomegaly at baseline continued to have a nonpalpable spleen; 1.7% (1/59) and 4.3% (2/47) had a spleen that was 0-5 cm, and 1.7% (1/59) and 4.3% (2/47) had a spleen ≥ 5 cm. A large proportion of pts achieved a response (ie, a clinically significant improvement) on the FACT-Lym TS and FACIT-Fatigue at wk 24 (43.0% [525/1220]; 47.1% [593/1258]) and wk 48 (43.2% [368/852]; 45.7% [396/867]). Similar responses were seen in pts without a palpable spleen (FACT-Lym TS: wk 24, 44.0% [22/50]; wk 48, 36.1% [13/36]; FACIT-Fatigue: wk 24, 49.1% [27/55]; wk 48, 35.1% [13/37]). CONCLUSIONS: To date, JUMP includes the largest cohort of pts with MF treated with RUX. Consistent with previous findings, anemia and thrombocytopenia were the most common AEs but rarely led to discontinuation. As observed previously, most pts experienced reductions in splenomegaly and symptoms with RUX treatment. Clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms were also seen in pts with no palpable spleen, a pt group not included in the COMFORT studies. Overall, the safety and efficacy profile of RUX in JUMP is consistent with that in the phase 3 COMFORT studies. Disclosures Palumbo: Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board. Le Coutre:Novartis: Honoraria. Al-Ali:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Ullrich:Novartis: Honoraria. Brittain:Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Foltz:Promedior: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Raanani:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Ariad: Other: Advisory Board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board. Gupta:Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghosh:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Tannir:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Perez Ronco:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Vannucchi:Novartis: Other: Research Funding paid to institution (University of Florence), Research Funding; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Phase 1/2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 432-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Jonathan Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 432 Elotuzumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody directed against CS1, a cell surface glycoprotein, which is highly and uniformly expressed in multiple myeloma (MM). Elotuzumab induces significant antibody-dependant cytotoxicity (ADCC) against primary myeloma cells in the presence of either autologous or allogeneic peripheral lymphocytes (PBMC), which is significantly enhanced when PBMC effector cells were pretreated with lenalidomide (Tai et al., Blood 112:1329, 2008). The primary objective of the phase 1 portion of the study is to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of elotuzumab in combination with lenalidomide and low dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM. The study is also evaluating safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical response. Lenalidomide (25 mg PO) is given on Days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. Elotuzumab in three escalating dose cohorts (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg) is administered by IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of the 28-day cycle in the first two cycles and then on Days 1 and 15 of each subsequent cycle. Dexamethasone is given weekly at 40 mg PO. Initially, patients received 6 cycles of treatment unless withdrawn earlier due to disease progression or unacceptable. toxicity. The protocol was amended to allow for patients in the 10 and 20 mg/kg cohorts to receive treatment for up to 12 months following enrollment of the last patient. Key entry criteria: age ≥ 18 years; MM with at least one relapse; measurable disease M-protein component in serum and/or in urine; and prior lenalidomide treatment, if any, more than 6 weeks of first dose. To date, 24 patients with a median age of 60 years have been enrolled in the study and 23 patients have received study drug. The median time from initial diagnosis of MM was 5 years and patients had received a median of 3 prior MM treatments. Patients had been previously treated with thalidomide (58%), bortezomib (67%) or lenalidomide (21%) and 42% were refractory to their most recent MM therapy. Patients have been treated in the 3 cohorts; 3 patients each in the first two cohorts (5 and 10 mg/kg elotuzumab) and 17 patients (7 in dose-escalation phase and 10 in the expansion phase) in the third cohort (20 mg/kg). No dose limiting toxicities were identified during the dose-escalation phase of the study and no MTD was established. One patient discontinued in the first cycle due to grade 4 allergic reaction resulting from elotuzumab infusion in the expansion phase of the study. Additional SAEs (1 of each) included grade 2 atrial fibrillation (related to lenalidomide/dexamethasone) and unrelated grade 4 ruptured diverticulum, grade 3 neutropenic fever and grade 3 diarrhea.. Other common grade 3 or 4 AEs included neutropenia (25%) and thrombocytopenia (25%), which were managed by dose withholding or dose reduction of lenalidomide. Approximately 25% of patients experienced grade 1 or 2 chills and/or pyrexia associated with elotuzumab infusion. The best clinical response (IMWG criteria) in the 13 patients who have received at least two cycles of treatment is shown in the table below. Preliminary PK analysis of elotuzumab suggests a serum half-life of 10-11 days at 10 and 20 mg/kg. Elotuzumab at all three doses resulted in near complete saturation of CS1 sites on plasma cells and NK cells in bone marrow and NK cells in the peripheral compartment. In conclusion, the combination of elotuzumab with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone has a manageable adverse event profile and compared to historical data for lenalidomide and high-dose dexamethasone, the preliminary efficacy data (≥ PR of 92%) are very encouraging. Additional safety, efficacy and PK/PD data will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Lonial: Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gloucester: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide/dexamethasone in combination with elotuzumab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Vij:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Harousseau:Celgene France: Advisory Board; Janssen Cilag France: Advisory Board; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kaufman:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding. Mazumder:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Leleu:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Fry:Facet Biotech: Employment. Singhal:Facet Biotech: Employment. Jagannath:Millennium: Advisory Board; Merck: Advisory Board.

A Phase 1b, Dose-Finding Study Of Ruxolitinib Plus Panobinostat In Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post–Polycythemia Vera MF (PPV-MF), Or Post–Essential Thrombocythemia MF (PET-MF): Identification Of The Recommended Phase 2 Dose

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4045-4045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincen t Ribrag ◽  
Claire N Harrison ◽  
Florian H Heidel ◽  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Suddhasatta Acharyya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with progressive, debilitating symptoms that impact patient quality of life (QoL) and reduce survival. Ruxolitinib (RUX), a potent dual JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, demonstrated superiority in spleen volume and symptom reduction, improved health-related QoL measures, and prolonged survival compared with traditional therapies or placebo in the phase 3 COMFORT studies. Panobinostat (PAN) is a potent oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor (DACi) that inhibits JAK pathway signaling through increased acetylation of the JAK2 protein chaperone HSP90. In phase 1/2 studies in MF, PAN has shown reduction in splenomegaly and JAK2 V617F allele burden, and improvement of marrow fibrosis. RUX and PAN demonstrated synergistic anti-MF activity in JAK2-mutation–driven MF murine models. Here, we present the results of a phase 1b study to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the combination of RUX and PAN in MF patients. Methods Patients with intermediate-1, -2, or high-risk MF by International Prognostic Scoring System criteria and with palpable splenomegaly ≥ 5 cm below the costal margin were enrolled. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first cycle along with other safety findings. DLTs were defined as protocol-specified toxicities related to treatment but unrelated to disease progression, intercurrent illness, or concomitant medications, occurring up to and including cycle 1 day 28, that are considered severe enough to prevent continuation of treatment. Each dosing cohort consisted of ≥ 3 evaluable patients. Data for ≥ 9 patients were required to determine the preliminary RP2D and/or maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Following determination of the preliminary RP2D, additional patients were to be enrolled and treated at that dose in the safety-expansion phase. The range of dose levels tested for RUX was 5-15 mg twice daily (BID) and for PAN was 10-25 mg once daily, 3 times a week (TIW; days 2, 4, and 6), every other week (QOW) in a 28-day cycle. Serial blood samples collected following the first dose of RUX alone on day 1 and in combination with PAN on days 2 and 6 were evaluated for plasma concentrations of RUX (days 1, 2, and 6) and PAN (days 2 and 6) by LC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using noncompartmental analysis. Spleen size was determined by palpation. Results A total of 38 patients have been enrolled across 6 cohorts in the dose-escalation phase. Preliminary data presented here are based on a cutoff date of March 7, 2013. Thirteen patients (34.2%) have discontinued study treatment. Reasons for discontinuation include disease progression (n = 4), adverse events (n = 7), withdrawal of consent (n = 1), and death due to pulmonary embolism (n = 1). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were anemia (34.2%), thrombocytopenia (21.2%), abdominal pain (7.9%), and diarrhea (7.9%). QTc prolongation of > 500 ms was observed in 1 patient in cohort 4. DLTs are summarized in the Table. An approximate 50% increase in plasma exposure of both RUX and PAN on day 6 from respective baselines suggested drug-drug interaction (DDI) at 15 mg RUX and 25 mg PAN. The RP2D was defined at the cohort 6 dose and schedule. Evidence of preliminary activity was observed across all cohorts with 28 patients (73.7%) showing ≥ 50% decrease in palpable spleen length at some point during the study. Conclusions The combination of RUX and PAN has a tolerable safety profile, with few DLTs and acceptable rates of grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia. Also, encouraging splenomegaly reduction was seen in the dose-escalation phase. The MTD was not reached; however, due primarily to findings of anemia and potential DDI in dose cohort 6, preliminary RP2D was identified at RUX 15 mg BID/PAN 25 mg TIW/QOW and will be confirmed in the dose-expansion phase. Additional safety and efficacy data from patients in the expansion phase will be presented. Disclosures: Ribrag: Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson : Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ruxolitinib is approved for MF but panobinostat is not approved anywhere globally at this time for any indication. Harrison:S Bio: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Heidel:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kiladjian:AOP Orphan: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Acharyya:Novartis: Employment. Mu:Novartis: Employment. Liu:Novartis: Employment. Williams:Novartis: Employment. Giles:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Conneally:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kindler:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Passamonti:sanofi-aventis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Vannucchi:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals A Real-World Assessment of Hepatic Dysfunction Among Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) Patients Receiving First-Line (1L) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) in the United States

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 36-37
Author(s):  
Kathryn Kolibaba ◽  
Jie Zhou ◽  
Scott Justin Keating ◽  
Jamyia Clark ◽  
John Brokars ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Hepatic Function ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Community Oncology ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tki Treatment ◽  
Advisory Role

Introduction:Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative disorder characterized by the unregulated proliferation of myeloid cells in the bone marrow and their accumulation in the blood. The approval of imatinib (IM) and second-generation TKIs have substantially improved survival for patients with CML. Despite the effectiveness of these TKIs in controlling CML, continuous therapy is necessary for most patients, and may be associated with the development of unfavorable adverse events such as hepatotoxicity. Although patients with elevated liver function tests are excluded from key clinical trials, case reports and small single-center studies have described cases of TKI-associated hepatotoxicity among patients with CML. This study sought to describe the prevalence and incidence of hepatotoxicity in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic-phase (Ph+ CP) CML treated with 1L TKIs in community oncology practices. Methods:This retrospective, observational cohort study identified adult patients newly diagnosed with Ph+ CP CML and treated with 1L dasatinib (DAS), IM, or nilotinib (NIL) within the US Oncology Network (USON) between 1 January 2008 and 30 November 2018. Patients were required to have at least one comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) within 90 days of treatment start, and ≥ 1 CMP during follow-up. Additionally, patients had to have at least two visits within the USON, no enrollment in any clinical trial during the study period, and no documentation of other primary cancer diagnoses. Descriptive statistics were generated for baseline patient characteristics and prevalence and incidence of hepatotoxicity, and were stratified by 1L TKI treatment initiation. Grades for hepatotoxicity were derived from laboratory data using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5. Results:A total of 2743 patients with CP-CML were identified. Of those, 730 (26.6%), 1455 (53.0%), and 558 (20.3%) patients were treated with 1L DAS, IM, or NIL, respectively. With the exception of age and region, patient demographic characteristics were well balanced across cohorts. However, baseline hepatic functioning differed across TKIs (Table 1). Prevalence of any-grade liver enzyme elevation was observed in almost one-third (31.9%) of patients, including 246 (33.7%) patients treated with DAS, 416 (28.6%) patients treated with IM, and 213 (38.2%) patients treated with NIL. Among all patients with normal baseline hepatic function, 48.9% developed any-grade hepatotoxicity while on 1L therapy. Across TKI cohorts, significantly more patients treated with NIL developed any-grade hepatotoxicity (70.1%) compared to patients treated with DAS (45.5%) or IM (43.5%) (P&lt; 0.0001). Among all patients receiving 1L treatment, 1.5% to 3.8% of patients experienced grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity. Significant differences in the proportion of patients that developed grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity were observed across treatments and were most common among patients treated with NIL (Table 2). Conclusions:Findings from this analysis suggest that hepatic dysfunction may be common at baseline among patients with CP-CML treated in real-world community oncology settings. Among patients with normal baseline hepatic function, more patients treated with NIL experienced any-grade hepatotoxicity. Patients treated with NIL were also more likely to develop grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity compared to patients treated with DAS or IM. These findings may provide insight into the effects of long-term TKI treatment on hepatic functioning and help to inform treatment choices for patients. Disclosures Kolibaba: AbbVie:Research Funding;Compass Oncology:Ended employment in the past 24 months;Janssen:Research Funding;TG Therapeutics:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;McKesson Life Sciences:Consultancy;Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology:Consultancy, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, ;Gilead:Research Funding;Genentech:Research Funding;Cell Therapeutics:Research Funding;Celgene:Research Funding;Acerta:Research Funding;Atara Biotech:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Verastem:Honoraria;Seattle Genetics:Research Funding;Novartis:Research Funding;Pharmacyclics:Research Funding.Zhou:McKesson Corporation:Current Employment.Keating:Bristol Myers Squibb:Current Employment.Clark:McKesson Life Sciences:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Brokars:Bristol Myers Squibb:Current Employment.Kee:Bristol Myers Squibb:Current Employment.Copher:Bristol Myers Squibb:Current Employment.Stwalley:Bristol Myers Squibb:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Jabbour:Adaptive Biotechnologies:Other: Advisory role, Research Funding;Genentech:Other: Advisory role, Research Funding;BMS:Other: Advisory role, Research Funding;Amgen:Other: Advisory role, Research Funding;Pfizer:Other: Advisory role, Research Funding;Takeda:Other: Advisory role, Research Funding;AbbVie:Other: Advisory role, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Carfilzomib, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (KPd) in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Refractory to Bortezomib and Lenalidomide. the EMN011 Trial

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 801-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter Sonneveld ◽  
Sonja Zweegman ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
Kazem Nasserinejad ◽  
Rosella Troia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Advisory Role

Abstract Introduction and background The treatment of patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) with relapse or progressive disease after bortezomib, lenalidomide and high-dose therapy represents an important challenge. In the EMN02 collaborative trial newly diagnosed patients with symptomatic MM were randomized to receive VCD induction followed by HDM/ASCT or VMP, followed by a second randomization for VRD consolidation or no consolidation, followed by lenalidomide maintenance until progression (Cavo et al, ASH2017, abstract #397; Sonneveld et al, EHA2018, abstract #108). The present Phase 2 trial was designed for patients with refractory disease or first progression after inclusion in EMN02 in order to evaluate a salvage treatment with next generation proteasome inhibition and IMId, i.e., Carfilzomib, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone. The primary endpoints were response and progression-free survival (PFS). This trial is registered at www.trialregister.nl as NTR5349 and EudraCT 2013-003265-34. Methods Patients who were included received four 28-days re-induction cycles of KPd, i.e. Carfilzomib (20/36mg/m2, days 1,2,8,9,15,16) with Pomalidomide (4 mg days 1-21) and Dexamethasone (20mg days 1,2,8,9,15,16). In patients who had not previously received HDM/ASCT, HDM(200 mg/m2) was administered followed by autologous stem cell transplantation with stem cells harvested during after induction therapy in the EMN02 trial. Consolidation consisted of 4 additional cycles of KPd, identical to the induction cycles. Patients with stable disease or better received Pomalidomide 4mg w/o Dexamethasone in 28 days cycles until progression. Results At the time of this first planned interim analysis 82 patients were registered and this analysis was performed in the first 60 patients. 48% were randomized prior HDM/ASCT and 42% VMP, and 10% were not randomized. Prior best responses in the EMN02 trial were 35% CR/sCR , 75% ≥VGPR, 97% ≥PR. The median follow-up from inclusion in EMN02 was 43 months (range 21 - 62 months). In 44 patients cytogenetic risk were known, 15 (34%) of them had high-risk FISH (del17p, t(14;16) or t(4;14)). 57 fifty-seven (95%) of patients had progressed during lenalidomide maintenance, 3 patient's data are not yet available. In the present trial 38 (63%) of patients achieved normal completion of treatment according to of the protocol. Twenty patients received their first HDM plus ASCT. Median time on therapy was 14 months. Full dose re-induction treatment according to protocol could be administered in 68% (for Carfilzomib) and 64% (for Pomalidomide) of patients respectively, while for consolidation this was 62% for both Carfilzomib and Best response on protocol was 31% CR/sCR, 65% ≥VGPR, 87% ≥PR, respectively, with no difference according to response on initial treatments. Median time to response (≥PR) was 2 months. At a median follow-up of 16.3 months (range 3 - 32 months) median PFS was 18 months with better outcome in standard risk cytogenetics (HR=0.27 (0.09, 0.83) 95% CIs vs NR) and in patients with prior VMP treatment (HR=0.49 (0.21, 1.16) 95% CIs vs NR). 48 (80%) of patients are alive and in follow-up. KPd-emerging non-hematologic grade 3 and 4 adverse events included cardiovascular (5%), respiratory (5%), infections (20%) and neuropathy (3%). There were 3 fatal SAEs not related to progression (1 patient cardiac failure, 2 patients pneumonia). KPd-emerging hematological toxicity grade 3 and 4 occurred in 30% of patients. Discussion This Phase 2 clinical trial demonstrates that KPd is a feasible, effective and safe triple drug regimen in RRMM patients who have been previously treated and/or are refractory to bortezomib and refractory to lenalidomide. A 87% overall response rate including 31% CR/sCR is clinically relevant in this population. Since median OS has not been reached, longer follow-up is needed. Acknowledgments This trial was conducted as an investigator sponsored trial in EMN and supported by independent grants and drug supply from Amgen and Celgene. Disclosures Sonneveld: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Zweegman:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cavo:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Corradini:Roche: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Sandoz: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Lecturer; Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board & Lecturer. Patriarca:Janssen: Other: Advisory role; Celgene: Other: Advisory Role; Travel, accommodations, expenses; Jazz: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; MSD Italy: Other: Advisory Role; Medac: Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses. Minnema:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy. Costa:celgene: Employment. Iskander:amgen: Employment. Boccadoro:Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Multicenter Analysis of Treatment and Outcomes for Patient with TP53 Mutated AML in the Era of Novel Therapies; Significant Impact of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation on Survival

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 797-797
Author(s):  
Talha Badar ◽  
Mark R. Litzow ◽  
Rory M. Shallis ◽  
Jan Philipp Bewersdorf ◽  
Antoine Saliba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Novel Therapies ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Tp53 Mutations

Abstract Background: TP53 mutations occur in 10-20% of patients with AML, constitute high-risk disease as per ELN criteria, and confer poorer prognosis. Venetoclax combination therapies and CPX-351 were recently approved for AML treatment and lead to improved outcomes in subsets of high-risk AML, however the most effective approach for treatment of TP53-mutated (m) AML remains unclear. In this study we explored the clinical outcome of TP53m AML patients treated over the last 8 years as novel therapies have been introduced to our therapeutic armamentarium. Methods: We conducted a multicenter observational study in collaboration with 4 U.S. academic centers and analyzed clinical characteristics and outcome of 174 TP53m AML patients diagnosed between March 2013 and February 2021. Mutation analysis was performed on bone marrow specimens using 42, 49, 199, or 400 gene targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Patients with an initial diagnosis of AML were divided into 4 groups (GP) based on the progressive use of novel therapies in clinical trials and their approvals as AML induction therapy during different time periods: 2013-2017 (GP1, n= 37), 2018-2019 (GP2, n= 53), 2019-2020 (GP3, n= 48) and 2020-2021 (GP4, n= 36) to analyze difference in outcome. Results: Baseline characteristics were not significantly different across different GP, as shown in Table 1. Median age of patients was 68 (range [R], 18-83), 65 (R, 29-88), 69 (R, 37-90) and 70 (R, 51-97) years in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.40). The percentage of patients with de novo AML/secondary AML/therapy-related AML in GP1-4 was 40/40/20, 36/29/24, 37.5/37.5/25 and 28/52/20, respectively (p=0.82). The proportion of patients with complex cytogenetics (CG) was 92%, 89%, 96% and 94% in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.54). The median TP53m variant allele frequency (VAF) was 48% (range [R], 5-94), 42% (R, 5-91), 45% (R, 10-94) and 60% (R, 8-82) in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.38). Four (11%), 13 (24.5%), 10 (21%) and 9 (25%) patients had multiple TP53 mutations in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.33). The proportion of patients who received 3+7 (30%, 16%, 6% & 8%; p=0.01), HMA only (11%, 18%, 2% & 8%; p=0.06), venetoclax-based (2.5%, 12%, 48%, & 61%; p &lt;0.01) and CPX-351 induction (16%, 40%, 28% & 5%; p&lt;0.001) were varied in GP1-4, respectively. The rate of CR/CRi was 22%, 26%, 28% and 18% in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.63). Treatment related mortality during induction was observed in 3%, 7%, 10% and 17% of patients in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.18). Overall, 28 (16%) patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) after induction/consolidation: 22%, 15%, 17% and 11% in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.67). In subset analysis, there was no difference in the rate of CR/CRi with venetoclax-based regimens vs. others (39% vs 61%, p=0.18) or with CPX-351 vs. others (25% vs 75%, p=0.84). The median progression-free survival was 7.7, 7.0, 5.1 and 6.6 months in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.60, Fig 1A). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.4, 6.1, 4.0 and 8.0 months in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.29, Fig 1B). In univariate analysis for OS, achievement of CR/CRi (p&lt;0.001) and alloHCT in CR1 (p&lt;0.001) associated with favorable outcome, whereas complex CG (p=0.01) and primary refractory disease (p&lt;0.001) associated with poor outcome. Multiple TP53 mutations (p=0.73), concurrent ASXL1m (p=0.86), extra-medullary disease (p=0.92), ≥ 3 non-TP53m mutations (p=0.72), TP53m VAF ≥ 40% vs. &lt; 40% (p=0.25), induction with CPX-351 vs. others (p=0.59) or venetoclax-based regimen vs. others (p=0.14) did not show significance for favorable or poor OS in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis, alloHCT in CR1 (hazard ratio [HR]=0.28, 95% CI: 0.15-0.53; p=0.001) retained an association with favorable OS and complex CG (HR 4.23, 95%CI: 1.79-10.0; p=0.001) retained an association with dismal OS. Conclusion: We present the largest experience with TP53m AML patients analyzed by NGS. Although outcomes were almost universally dismal, alloHCT appears to improve the long-term survival in a subset of these patients. Effective therapies are warranted to successfully bridge patients to alloHCT and to prolong survival for transplant ineligible patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Badar: Pfizer Hematology-Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Litzow: Omeros: Other: Advisory Board; Pluristem: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Advisory Board; AbbVie: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Biosight: Other: Data monitoring committee. Shallis: Curis: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Goldberg: Celularity: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; DAVA Oncology: Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aptose: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Atallah: BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Foran: revolution medicine: Honoraria; gamida: Honoraria; bms: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; takeda: Research Funding; kura: Research Funding; h3bioscience: Research Funding; OncLive: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; aptose: Research Funding; actinium: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; trillium: Research Funding; sanofi aventis: Honoraria; certara: Honoraria; syros: Honoraria; taiho: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; aprea: Research Funding; sellas: Research Funding; stemline: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Conventional Immunochemotherapy (R-CHOEP) Vs High-Dose Immunochemotherapy (R-MegaCHOEP) in Younger Patients with High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: 10-Year Long-Term Follow-up of a German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA) Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1589-1589
Author(s):  
Fabian Frontzek ◽  
Marita Ziepert ◽  
Maike Nickelsen ◽  
Bettina Altmann ◽  
Bertram Glass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Scientific Advisory Board ◽  
Scientific Advisory

Introduction: The R-MegaCHOEP trial showed that dose-escalation of conventional chemotherapy necessitating autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) does not confer a survival benefit for younger patients (pts) with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the Rituximab era (Schmitz et al., Lancet Oncology 2012; 13, 1250-1259). To describe efficacy and toxicity over time and document the long-term risks of relapse and secondary malignancy we present the 10-year follow-up of this study. Methods: In the randomized, prospective phase 3 trial R-MegaCHOEP younger pts aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk (aaIPI 2-3) aggressive B-cell lymphoma were assigned to 8 cycles of CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubcine, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone) or 4 cycles of dose-escalated high-dose therapy (HDT) necessitating repetitive ASCT both combined with Rituximab. Both arms were stratified according to aaIPI, bulky disease, and center. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). All analyses were calculated for the intention-to-treat population. This follow-up report includes molecular data based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC (IHC: 31/92 positive [40-100%], FISH: 14/103 positive), BCL2 (IHC: 65/89 positive [50-100%], FISH: 23/111 positive) and BCL6 (IHC: 52/86 positive [30-100%], FISH: 34/110 positive) and data on cell of origin (COO) classification according to the Lymph2CX assay (GCB: 53/88; ABC: 24/88; unclassified: 11/88). Results: 130 pts had been assigned to R-CHOEP and 132 to R-MegaCHOEP. DLBCL was the most common lymphoma subtype (~80%). 73% of pts scored an aaIPI of 2 and 27% an aaIPI of 3. 60% of pts had an initial lymphoma bulk and in 40% more than 1 extranodal site was involved. After a median observation time of 111 months, EFS at 10 years was 57% (95% CI 47-67%) in the R-CHOEP vs. 51% in the R-MegaCHOEP arm (42-61%) (hazard ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8, p=0.228), overall survival (OS) after 10 years was 72% (63-81%) vs. 66% (57-76%) respectively (p=0.249). With regard to molecular characterization, we were unable to detect a significant benefit for HDT/ASCT in any subgroup analyzed. In total, 16% of pts (30 pts) relapsed after having achieved a complete remission (CR). 23% of all relapses (7 pts) showed an indolent histology (follicular lymphoma grade 1-3a) and 6 of these pts survived long-term. In contrast, of 23 pts (77%) relapsing with aggressive DLBCL or unknown histology 18 pts died due to lymphoma or related therapy. The majority of relapses occurred during the first 3 years after randomization (median time: 22 months) while after 5 years we detected relapses only in 5 pts (3% of all 190 pts prior CR). 11% of pts were initially progressive (28 pts) among whom 71% (20 pts) died rapidly due to lymphoma. Interestingly, the remaining 29% (8 pts) showed a long-term survival after salvage therapy (+/- ASCT); only 1 pt received allogeneic transplantation. The frequency of secondary malignancies was very similar in both treatment arms (9% vs. 8%) despite the very high dose of etoposide (total 4g/m2)in the R-MegaCHOEP arm. We observed 2 cases of AML and 1 case of MDS per arm. In total 70 pts (28%) have died: 30 pts due to lymphoma (12%), 22 pts therapy-related (11 pts due to salvage therapy) (9%), 8 pts of secondary neoplasia (3%), 5 pts due to concomitant disease (2%) and 5 pts for unknown reasons. Conclusions: This 10-year long-term follow-up of the R-MegaCHOEP trial confirms the very encouraging outcome of young high-risk pts following conventional chemotherapy with R-CHOEP. High-dose therapy did not improve outcome in any subgroup analysis including molecular high-risk groups. Relapse rate was generally low. Pts with aggressive relapse showed a very poor long-term outcome while pts with indolent histology at relapse survived long-term. Secondary malignancies occurred; however, they were rare with no excess leukemias/MDS following treatment with very high doses of etoposide and other cytotoxic agents. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Figure Disclosures Nickelsen: Roche Pharma AG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Roche: Honoraria. Truemper:Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Held:Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Dreyling:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: scientific advisory board; Sandoz: Other: scientific advisory board; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Other: scientific advisory board. Viardot:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenwald:MorphoSys: Consultancy. Lenz:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Employment, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Schmitz:Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Equity Ownership; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Ixazomib with Conventional Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Adults

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Philip C. Amrein ◽  
Eyal C. Attar ◽  
Geoffrey Fell ◽  
Traci M. Blonquist ◽  
Andrew M. Brunner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Outcomes for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) among older patients has remained largely unchanged for decades. Long-term survival for patients aged &gt;60 years is poor (median survival 10.5 months). Targeting the proteasome in AML is attractive, since leukemia stem cells have demonstrated sensitivity to proteasome inhibition in preclinical models, perhaps through down regulation of nuclear NF-KB (Guzman, Blood 2001). AML cell lines are susceptible to synergistic cytotoxicity when bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, is combined with daunorubicin and cytarabine. We have shown that adding bortezomib to standard treatment in AML results in a high remission rate, although grade 2 sensory neurotoxicity was noted in approximately 12% of treated patients. A newer generation proteasome inhibitor, ixazomib, is less frequently associated with neurotoxicity, and, therefore, was selected for combination with conventional chemotherapy in this phase I trial. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib in combination with conventional induction and consolidation chemotherapy for AML. Herein are the initial results of this trial. Methods: Adults &gt;60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML were screened for eligibility. Patients with secondary AML were eligible, including those with prior hypomethylating agent therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We excluded those with promyelocytic leukemia. There were 2 phases in this study. In the first phase (A), the induction treatment consisted of the following: cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day by continuous IV infusion, Days 1-7; daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/day IV, Days 1, 2, 3, and ixazomib was provided orally at the cohort dose, Days 2, 5, 9, and 12. Consolidaton or transplant was at the discretion of the treating physician in phase A. In the second phase (B), induction was the same as that with the determined MTD of ixazomib. All patients were to be treated with the following consolidation: cytarabine at 2 g/m2/day, days 1-5 with ixazomib on days 2, 5, 9, and 12 at the cohort dose for consolidation. A standard 3 + 3 patient cohort dose escalation design was used to determine whether the dose of ixazomib could be safely escalated in 3 cohorts (1.5 mg/day, 2.3 mg/day, 3.0 mg/day), initially in induction (phase A) and subsequently in consolidation (phase B). The determined MTD of ixazomib in the first portion (A) of the trial was used during induction in the second portion (B), which sought to determine the MTD for ixazomib during consolidation. Secondary objectives included rate of complete remission, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-six patients have been enrolled on study, and 28 have completed dose levels A-1 through A-3 and B1 through B-2. Full information on cohort B-3 has not yet been obtained, hence, this report covers the experience with the initial 28 patients, cohorts A-1 through B-2. There were 12 (43%) patients among the 28 with secondary AML, either with prior hematologic malignancy or therapy-related AML. Nineteen patients (68%) were male, and the median age was 68 years (range 61-80 years). There have been no grade 5 toxicities due to study drug. Three patients died early due to leukemia, 2 of which were replaced for assessment of the MTD. Nearly all the grade 3 and 4 toxicities were hematologic (Table). There was 1 DLT (grade 4 platelet count decrease extending beyond Day 42). There has been no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity with ixazomib to date. Among the 28 patients in the first 5 cohorts, 22 achieved complete remissions (CR) and 2 achieved CRi, for a composite remission rate (CCR) of 86%. Among the 12 patients with secondary AML 8 achieved CR and 2 achieved CRi, for a CCR of 83%. The median OS for the 28 patients has not been reached (graph). The 18-month OS estimate was 65% [90% CI, 50-85%]. Conclusions: The highest dose level (3 mg) of ixazomib planned for induction in this trial has been reached safely. For consolidation there have been no serious safety issues in the first 2 cohorts with a dose up to 2.3 mg, apart from 1 DLT in the form of delayed platelet count recovery. The recommended phase 2 dose of ixazomib for induction is 3 mg. Accrual to cohort B-3 is ongoing. Notably, to date, no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity has been encountered. The remission rate in this older adult population with the addition of ixazomib to standard chemotherapy appears favorable. Figure Disclosures Amrein: Amgen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Attar:Aprea Therapeutics: Current Employment. Brunner:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hobbs:Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria. Neuberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Fathi:Blueprint: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib is FDA approved for multiple myeloma. We are using it in this trial for acute myeloid leukemia.

scholarly journals The Application of Machine Learning to Improve the Subclassification and Prognostication of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 28-28
Author(s):  
Hassan Awada ◽  
Arda Durmaz ◽  
Carmel Gurnari ◽  
Ashwin Kishtagari ◽  
Manja Meggendorfer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Cross Validation ◽  
Steering Committee ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Genomic Features ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Genetic mutations (somatic or germline), cytogenetic abnormalities and their combinations contribute to the heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) phenotypes. To date, prototypic founder lesions [e.g., t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17)] define only a fraction of AML subgroups with specific prognoses. Indeed, in a larger proportion of AML patients, somatic mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities potentially serve as driver lesions in combination with numerous acquired secondary hits. However, their combinatorial complexity can preclude the resolution of distinct genomic classifications and overlap across classical pathomorphologic AML subtypes, including de novo/primary (pAML) and secondary AML (sAML) evolving from an antecedent myeloid neoplasm (MN). These prognostically discrete AML subtypes are themselves nonspecific due to variable understanding of their pathogenetic links, especially in cases without overt dysplasia. Without dysplasia, reliance is mainly on anamnestic clinical information that might be unavailable or cannot be correctly assigned due to a short prodromal history of antecedent MN. We explored the potential of genomic markers to sub-classify AML objectively and provide unbiased personalized prognostication, irrespective of the clinicopathological information, and thus become a standard in AML assessment. We collected and analyzed genomic data from a multicenter cohort of 6788 AML patients using standard and machine learning (ML) methods. A total of 13,879 somatic mutations were identified and used to predict traditional pathomorphologic AML classifications. Logistic regression modeling (LRM) detected mutations in CEBPA (both monoallelic "CEBPAMo" and biallelic "CEBPABi"), DNMT3A, FLT3ITD, FLT3TKD, GATA2, IDH1, IDH2R140, NRAS, NPM1 and WT1 being enriched in pAML while mutations in ASXL1, RUNX1, SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, -5/del(5q), -7/del(7q), -17/del(17P), del(20q), +8 and complex karyotype being prevalent in sAML. Despite these significant findings, the genomic profiles of pAML vs. sAML identified by LRM resulted in only 74% cross-validation accuracy of the predictive performance when used to re-assign them. Therefore, we applied Bayesian Latent Class Analysis that identified 4 unique genomic clusters of distinct prognoses [low risk (LR), intermediate-low risk (Int-Lo), intermediate-high risk (Int-Hi) and high risk (HR) of poor survival) that were validated by survival analysis. To link each prognostic group to pathogenetic features, we generated a random forest (RF) model that extracted invariant genomic features driving each group and resulted in 97% cross-validation accuracy when used for prognostication. The model's globally most important genomic features, quantified by mean decrease in accuracy, included NPM1MT, RUNX1MT, ASXL1MT, SRSF2MT, TP53MT, -5/del(5q), DNMT3AMT, -17/del(17p), BCOR/L1MT and others. The LR group was characterized by the highest prevalence of normal cytogenetics (88%) and NPM1MT (100%; 86% with VAF&gt;20%) with co-occurring DNMT3AMT (52%), FLT3ITD-MT (27%; 91% with VAF &lt;50%), IDH2R140-MT (16%, while absent IDH2R172-MT), and depletion or absence of ASXL1MT, EZH2MT, RUNX1MT, TP53MT and complex cytogenetics. Int-Lo had a higher percentage of abnormal cytogenetics cases than LR, the highest frequency of CEBPABi-MT (9%), IDH2R172K-MT (4%), FLT3ITD-MT (14%) and FLT3TKD-MT (6%) occurring without NPM1MT, while absence of NPM1MT, ASXL1MT, RUNX1MT and TP53MT. Int-Hi had the highest frequency of ASXL1MT (39%), BCOR/L1MT (16%), DNMT3AMT without NPM1MT (19%), EZH2MT (9%), RUNX1MT (52%), SF3B1MT (7%), SRSF2MT (38%) and U2AF1MT (12%). Finally, HR had the highest prevalence of abnormal cytogenetics (96%), -5/del(5q) (68%), -7del(7q) (35%), -17del(17p) (31%) and the highest odds of complex karyotype (76%) as well as TP53MT (70%). The model was then internally and externally validated using a cohort of 203 AML cases from the MD Anderson Cancer Center. The RF prognostication model and group-specific survival estimates will be available via a web-based open-access resource. In conclusion, the heterogeneity inherent in the genomic changes across nearly 7000 AML patients is too vast for traditional prediction methods. Using newer ML methods, however, we were able to decipher a set of prognostic subgroups predictive of survival, allowing us to move AML into the era of personalized medicine. Disclosures Advani: OBI: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Steering committee/ honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board/ honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: steering committee/ honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory board/ honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Takeda: Research Funding. Ravandi:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Orsenix: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Xencor: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Carraway:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Other: Independent Advisory Committe (IRC); Stemline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Research support, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Other: Independent Advisory Committe (IRC); ASTEX: Other: Independent Advisory Committe (IRC); Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Saunthararajah:EpiDestiny: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Kantarjian:Sanofi: Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aptitute Health: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Adaptive biotechnologies: Honoraria; Ascentage: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; BioAscend: Honoraria; Delta Fly: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Oxford Biomedical: Honoraria. Kadia:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Cellenkos: Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pulmotec: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Sekeres:Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda/Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maciejewski:Alexion, BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document