Optimizing the Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell (HSC) Transplantation for Hematological Malignancies: The Perfect Combination of Conditioning Regimen, Disease Stage and Type of HSC Donor

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4324-4324
Author(s):  
Mauricette Michallet ◽  
Mohamad Sobh ◽  
Hélène Labussière-wallet ◽  
Marie Balsat ◽  
Caroline Lejeune ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Hla Matching ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative strategy for a majority of patients with high-risk hematological malignancies. Several studies have evaluated the impact of conditioning intensity on the long-term transplantation outcomes, mainly retrospective and derived from large registries or non-randomized trials. These studies showed that more intensive conditioning (MAC) regimens are associated with a reduced risk of relapse, but do not translate into improvement of survival due to increased non-relapse mortality (NRM). Reduced intensity/Non-myeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA) through graft-versus-leukemia effect has been associated with lower NRM, but higher relapse rates leading to similar overall survival (OS) when compared to MAC. However, in daily clinical practice, these results are difficult to follow because of the combination of important impact of disease stage, the type of HSC donor and its HLA matching with the patient. In addition, the historical nature of the previous studies may lead to the observation of different results today as the experience in drugs toxicities management has changed over time. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the conditioning regimen intensity taking into account the disease stage and the type of HSC donor with its HLA matching on transplantation outcomes in a large population of patients with high-risk hematological malignancies. Material and methods A total of 542 patients who received allo-HSCT between January 2006 and December 2014 in our center were included, 321 (59%) were males, the median age at allo-HSCT was 49 years (range: 18-70). There was 256 (47%) acute leukemia (202 AML, 54 ALL), 61 (11%) MDS, 60 (11%) multiple myeloma, 46 (8%) NHL, 25 (5%) Hodgkin's disease, 23 (4%) myeloproliferative neoplasms, 21 (4%) CML, 12 (2%) CLL and the rest with other hematological diseases. All patients were classified as at high-risk according to either clinical, immunophenotypic, cytogenetic or molecular markers. Conditioning regimen was classified as recently published (Gyurkocza et al. Blood 2014), therefore 282 (52%) received MAC and 260 (48%) received RIC/NMA; at allo-HSCT 320 (59%) patients were in CR and 222 (41%) in less than CR. HSC donor was identical siblings (Sib) for 199 (37%) patients (100 BM, 99 PBSC), 10/10 HLA matched unrelated (MUD) for 159 (29%) (79 BM, 80 PBSC), 6/6 HLA matched double cord blood (CB) units for 12 (2%), 9/10 HLA mismatched unrelated (MMUD) for 114 (21%) (54 BM, 60 PBSC), and the rest of 58 (11%) were 5/6 or 4/6 MM double CB units. For sex mismatching, in 119 (22%), it was female donor to a male patient; 295 (54%) were ABO compatible, 105 (20%) had minor incompatibility and 142 (26%) major incompatibility. Results The median follow-up for surviving patients was 29 months (range: 4-96). We conducted a cox multivariate model for OS including patient age, disease status at allo-HSCT, conditioning regimen, type of donor and HLA matching, in addition to ABO and sex mismatching, with stratification on the type of disease; this model showed a significant impact of disease status in favor of CR (HR=1.5, 95%CI: 1.2-2.0, p=0.001), conditioning regimen in favor of MAC (HR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.53-0.88, p=0.003) and type of donor in favor of Sib (HR=0.68, 95%CI: 0.5-0.9, p=0.01). Interestingly, we were able to find an optimal association between these 3 factors leading to significantly better results in terms of OS and NRM independently of the disease type. When in CR, patients receiving MAC from Sib or from MUD had significant better OS and NRM compared to the rest of patients with 5-years rates of 71% vs 36% (p<0.0001) and 15% vs 37% (p=0.001) respectively. If not in CR, only patients who received HSC from Sib either after RIC or MAC showed significantly better OS and NRM compared to the rest of patients with 5-years rates of 50% vs 26% (p=0.001) and 22% vs 45% (p=0.008) respectively (see Figure). Considering only MMUD, patients receiving CB with RIC had better OS and NRM rates compared to 9/10 MMUD (RIC or MAC) and to MAC CB (p=0.07). Conclusion We provide in this large study, a practical daily clinical practice outcome preview after allo-HSCT, independently of the type of disease, for the combination of significant impacting factors namely disease status at allo-HSCT, conditioning regimen and type of HSC donor with a superiority for MAC when used in CR from Sib or MUD. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from Unrelated Peripheral Blood or Bone Marrow Donors: The Impact of HLA Matching Including HLA-DPB1 Allele in a Multivariable Risk Model

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3213-3213
Author(s):  
Mauricette Michallet ◽  
Mohamad Sobh ◽  
Hélène Labussière-wallet ◽  
Marie Balsat ◽  
Caroline Lejeune ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Male Patient ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Cell Epitope ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Hla Matching ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Female Donor ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from unrelated donors has been increasingly used worldwide in the last decade in patients with hematological malignancies when HLA-identical sibling donors are unavailable. Identification of the HLA locus matching at the allele level is important in optimizing transplantation outcomes by minimizing non-relapse mortality (NRM) as well as in enhancing the graft-versus-leukemia effect. It has been demonstrated that patients with HSC donors matched on HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 alleles can have different outcomes if considering matching on HLA-DPB1 allele. HLA-DPB1 mismatches based on T-cell-epitope groups could identify mismatches that might be tolerated (permissive) and those that would negatively impact transplantation outcomes (non-permissive). We conducted this study to evaluate the impact of HLA matching degree between patient and HSC donor including HLA-DPB1, taking into account the other impacting variables in the allo-HSCT settings. Material and methods A total of 235 patients who received allo-HSCT at our center between January 2005 and December 2014 with a full donor/recipient HLA class I and II locus available data were included, 131 (56%) were males, the median age at allo-HSCT was 50 years (range: 18-69). There was 123 (53%) acute leukemia (93 AML, 30 ALL), 24 (10%) MDS, 35 (15%) multiple myeloma, 20 (8%) NHL, 7 (3%) Hodgkin's disease, 10 (4%) myeloproliferative neoplasms, 13 (6%) CML, and 3 (1%) CLL. One hundred and nineteen patients (51%) received myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and 116 (49%) received reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). Disease status at allo-HSCT was complete remission (CR) in 144 (61%) patients and less than CR in 91 (39%). HSC donor was 10/10 HLA matched unrelated (MUD) for 162 (69%) (80 PBSC and 93 BM), among them 21 (9%) were matched for HLA-DPB1, 41 (18%) had permissive mismatch and 100 (42%) had non-permissive mismatch; while 73 (31%) had 9/10 HLA mismatched donor MMUD (48 PBSC and 25 BM), among them, 7 (3%) were matched for HLA-DPB1, 12 (5%) had permissive mismatch and 54 (23%) had non-permissive mismatch; 110 (47%) were ABO compatible, 58 (24%) had minor incompatibility and 67 (29%) had major incompatibility. For sex mismatching, in 33 (14%) cases, it was female donor to a male patient. Results After a median follow-up for surviving patients of 29 months (range: 4-108), patients with 10/10 HLA MUD had better overall survival (OS) than those with 9/10 MMUD without considering the HLA-DPB1 matching, with 2 years OS probability of 51% vs 35% respectively (p=0.09), which was reflected by a lower NRM at 2 years of 29% vs 42% (p=0.07). When considering the HLA-DPB1 matching, we found comparable outcomes in terms of OS and NRM for: 1) 10/10 HLA MUD - DPB1 matched vs 10/10 HLA MUD - DPB1 permissive mismatched, 2) 10/10 HLA MUD - non-permissive DPB1 mismatched vs 9/10 HLA MMUD - DPB1 matched, 3) 9/10 HLA MMUD - DPB1 matched vs 9/10 HLA MMUD - DPB1 permissive mismatched; all these 3 groups were not significantly different between each other expect for a last group which included 9/10 HLA MMUD with non-permissive DPB1 mismatch, this group had worse OS and NRM compared to all others with 2 years rates of 34% vs 49% (p=0.05) and 47% vs 29% (p=0.04) respectively. In multivariate analysis, patient age (>50 years), disease status (less than CR), HLA matching (9/10 HLA MUD non-permissive DPB1) and sex mismatching (female donor to male patient) were significantly impacting OS and NRM. We included all these variables in a risk score: age < 50 years= 0, > 50 years= 1; CR= 0, less than CR= 1; HLA 10/10 (matched on DPB1) or HLA 10/10 with permissive MM on DPB1= 0; HLA 10/10 with non-permissive MM on DPB1 or HLA 9/10 (matched on DPB1 or with permissive MM on DPB1)=1; HLA 9/10 with non-permissive MM on DPB1=2; for sex matching, female donor to male patient=1, all other= 0. The risk score distinguished low risk patients (total score=0), intermediate (total score=1 or 2) and high risk (total score >2) with 2 years OS and NRM rates of 66%, 52%, 30% (p=0.003) and 22%, 29% 48% (p=0.004) respectively. Conclusion MMUD with non-permissive T-cell-epitope mismatch at HLA-DPB1 should be avoided due to increased rates of NRM. The risk score combining HLA matching with age, disease status and sex matching is very helpful for daily clinical practice offering patients better treatment strategy. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Phase I/I Clinical Trial for the Evaluation of Bortezomib within the Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen (RIC) and Post-Allogeneic Transplantation As Gvhd Prophylaxis Among High-Risk Myeloma Patients. EudraCT: 2005–004858-27

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3025-3025
Author(s):  
Jose Antonio Perez-Simón ◽  
Teresa Caballero-Velazquez ◽  
Cristina Encinas ◽  
Cristina Castilla-Llorente ◽  
Rodrigo Martino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Abstract Abstract 3025 Introduction: Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the only curative treatment for MM, it is associated to a high morbility and mortality. Moreover, relapses are common after allo-RIC. Accordingly, new strategies are required to reduce both the risk of relapse and the toxicity of the procedure. As we have previously demonstrated, Bz induces a selective depletion of alloreactive T-cells and has immunomodulatory properties which might be of potential benefit for GVHD control. The primary end point of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of allo-RIC in terms of response when Bz was added as part of a reduced intensity conditioning prior to allo-SCT. Secondary end points included incidence of GVHD and analysis of the toxicity of the procedure when Bz is also administered post-infussion as part of the GVHD prophylaxis. Method: Prior to allo-RIC, patients received two cycles of Bz plus dexamethasone. Conditioning consisted of fludarabine (30 mg/m2 intravenously on days -9 to -5) and melphalan (70 mg/m2 intravenously on days -4, -3) plus Bz 1, 3mg/m2 on day - 11 and -2. GVHD prophylaxis included cyclosporine (CsA) and methotrexate for the first 9 patients and CsA plus MTX and Bz on days +3 and +7 for the remaining 7 patients. From day +50 post allo-RIC 7 cycles of Bz (+1, +8, +15) were administered, the first two cycles every 28 days and the rest every 56. Results: 16 patients from the Twenty-one initially enrolled, were evaluable. All 16 patients had received at least 2 lines of therapy including autologous-SCT. Disease status was CR or nCR in 4 patients, 9 had PR and the remaining 3 patients had relapsed / progressive disease. 15 patients maintained or improved status at transplant including all × patients with active disease at transplant. Eight patients (50%) relapsed, four with extramedullary involvement. No patient developed grade 4 aGVHD.Grades 2–3 aGVHD occurred in 6 patients (37%). Interestingly, two out of the nine (29%) patients who received Bz on days +3 and 7 developed grades 2–3 acute GVHD as compared to four of the nine (44%) who did not receive it. In terms of toxicity, one patient did not achieve platelet engraftment and 2 patients developed peripheral neuropathy requiring treatment withdrawal. 8 patients died, four of them due to relapse (MRT: 25%). With a median follow-up of 457 days overall survival was 46%. Conclusions: The current trial is the first evaluating the efficacy and safety of Bz as part of a reduced intensity conditioning regimen among patients with high risk MM undergoing allogeneic transplantation. Regarding the efficacy of the procedure all but one patient improved disease status post-alloRIC although relapse rate was still high in this heavily pretreated population. In addition, Bz post-alloSCT is well tolerated and may decrease the incidence of GVHD. Disclosures: Perez-Simón: Janssen-Cilag: Patents & Royalties. Off Label Use: This study evaluates the efficacy of Bortezomib as part of a reduced intensity conditioning regimen among patients with high risk MM undergoing allogeneic transplantation. Rosiñol:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. San Miguel:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide and Melphalan As Conditioning Regimen for Pediatric Patients with AML in 1st or 2nd CR: A Retrospective Analysis from the AIEOP HSCT Registry

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2106-2106
Author(s):  
Annalisa Ruggeri ◽  
Marco Zecca ◽  
Franca Fagioli ◽  
Adriana Balduzzi ◽  
Mattia Algeri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Donor Type

Abstract Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is largely adopted as post-remissional therapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) but with high-risk characteristics (including high-risk cytogenetics or high levels of minimal residual disease at the end of induction therapy) or to rescue patients reaching CR2 after a previous relapse. Busulfan-based regimens represent the standard of care for these patients in association with alkylating agents. One of the most frequent drugs combination used in Europe in pediatric patients is Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide and Melphan (BuCyMel), which provide a potent anti-leukemic effect, despite remarkable extramedullary toxicities, especially in adolescents. We aimed at analyzing the results of children with AML receiving BuCyMel and reported to the AIEOP registry from 2008 to 2015. A total of 182 patients were reported by 15 transplant centers. Median age at HSCT was 9 years (range 0.3-18); 100 patients (55%) were male. Disease status at HSCT was CR1 in 159 (88%) patients and CR2 in the remaining 23 (12%). All patients received the same myeloablative conditioning regimen with BuCyMel and GVHD prophylaxis was mainly based on calcineurin inhibitors, with the addition of methotrexate in unrelated donors recipients. In vivo T-cell depletion/modulation with ATG was used in 90 cases (49.5%). In almost all cases, pharmacokinetics monitoring of Busulfan was performed, with the drug dosage adjusted according to the systemic exposure evaluated after the first dose. Donor type was an HLA-matched family donor (MFD) in 82 (45%) patients and an unrelated donor (UD) in 100 (55%); 154 (85%) patients received bone marrow (BM) as stem cell source, while the remaining patients (15%) were transplanted with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). Median follow up for surviving patients was 39 months (range 1-111). All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV and grade III-IV aGVHD was 35% (95%CI 28-42) and 11% (95% CI 7-16), respectively. The CI of aGVHD was not different according to the type of donor, being 37% (95%CI 28-50) and 32% (95%CI 24-46) in MFD and UD, respectively (p=0.38). The CI of chronic GVHD at 3 years was 17% (95%CI 12-24), while that of extensive cGVHD was 6% (95%CI 3-10). No difference was found in the CI of CGVHD according to the donor employed (MFD 15% and UD 19%, p=0.49). Overall, the CI of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 3 years was 18% (95%CI 12-26) and 15% (95%CI 10-22), respectively. The CI of relapse and NRM was significantly different according to age at HSCT (using 12 years as cut-off): (Relapse age<12y: 21% (95%CI 15-32) and age>12y: 11% (95%CI 3-32), (p=0.003); NRM age<12y: 10% (95%CI 5-20) and age>12y: 24% (95%CI 15-37), (p=0.005). According to disease status at HSCT the CI of relapse and NRM were as follows: Relapse: CR1: 18% (95%CI 18-26), CR2 15% (95%CI 5-41) p=0.90) and NRM CR1: 14% (95%CI 9-21), CR2 19% (95%CI 8-46) p=0.38). Also, there was no difference in relapse and NRM by donor type, relapse: MFD 16% (95%CI 9-28), UD 19% (95%CI 11-32) p=0.38) NRM: MFD 19% (95%CI 11-34), UD 11% (95%CI 7-20) p=0.62). Causes of deaths were disease recurrence (39%), infections (27%), and GVHD (12%). Three- years overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 74% (95%CI 67-81) and 68% (95%CI 60-70). DFS was 70% (95%CI 60-77) and 67% (95%CI 47-87) for patients transplanted in CR1 and CR2 respectively, (p=0.39); and was 70% (95%CI 59-81) and 65% (95%CI 53-78), p=0.77, for UD and MFD HSCT recipients, respectively. In conclusion, our results confirm the efficacy of BuCyMel in preventing relapse in a large series of pediatric patients affected by AML in CR1 and CR2. Adolescents represent a population of more fragile patients at risk of developing transplant-related fatalities. Optimization of toxicity profile and supportive care could further improve outcomes. Prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted to assess the best conditioning regimen for children and adolescents with AML. Disclosures Zecca: Chimerix: Honoraria. Locatelli:Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Updated Analysis of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations after Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen (RIC HSCT) for Hematological Malignancies from the Société Française de Greffe de Moelle Osseuse et de Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC) Registry.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 45-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricette Michallet ◽  
Quoc-Hung Le ◽  
Thomas Prebet ◽  
Mohamad Mohty ◽  
Jean Michel Boiron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Global Population

Abstract This report updates a retrospective study from SFGM-TC registry concerning 738 patients who underwent RIC HSCT for hematological malignancies [280 F, 458 M, median age: 51 years (1–72)] between 1997 and 2004. The diagnosis were 173 AML, 40 ALL, 68 MDS, 152 NHL, 36 HD, 45 CLL, 70 CML, 154 MM; 332 patients have been previously transplanted. At time of conditioning, 261 patients were in CR, 224 in PR and 253 in progressive disease (PD). Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were used in 574 patients and bone marrow in 164 patients from 655 HLA related donors and 83 unrelated donors. As conditioning, 152 patients received fludarabine and TBI (2 grays), 300 patients fludarabine, busulfan and anti-thymocyte globulins (FBS) (ATG 1d: 57, 2 d: 84, 3 d: 58, 4 d: 18, 5 d: 83) and 286 patients an other regimen. As GVHD prophylaxis, 722 patients received a cyclosporine A (CsA) based regimen. After transplant, 252 patients (35%) in the global population developed an acute GVHD ≥ grade II (grades III and IV: 116) and 208 patients (37%) in the PBSCT population (grades III and IV: 100). A chronic GVHD was present in 258 patients (38%) in the global population (115 limited and 143 extensive) and 221 patients (42%) in the PBSCT population (95 limited and 126 extensive). With a median follow-up of 27 months, the 3-year probability of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) for the global population was 38% (33–44) and 28%(24–34) and for PBSC SCT patients 39%(33–46) and 32%(27–39) respectively. The 3-year probability of OS varied according to diagnosis (CLL: 62%, NHL:50%, CML:44%, MM:41%, MDS:37%, AML:26%, ALL:20%) and cGVHD (no:28%, yes:61%). The cumulative TRM incidence was 12% at 1 year and 13% at 3 years. A multivariate analysis was performed studying pre and post transplant factors for OS, EFS and GVHD:. Table 1 summarizes all variables showing a significant impact on OS and EFS. Furthermore, analyses showed the impact of one variable on AGVHD and cGVHD for PBSCT population: FBS with ATG 1day vs 2 days [HR:1.56(1.19–2.04) p=0.001, HR:1.50(1.14–1.97) p=0.003]. In conclusion, besides the influence of known factors on OS and EFS after RIC HSCT, this study pointed out, on a large series with a long-term follow-up, the major impact of disease status, acute and chronic GVHD and demonstrated the important role of ATG duration on GVHD incidence. Table 1: Multivariate analyses OS/EFS Variables OS (HR) p EFS (HR) p Conditionning :FBS ATG 1d vs 2 d Global 1.47 (1–2.2) 0,05 NS PBSC 1.6 (1.03–2.49) 0,04 NS FBS ATG 5d vs 2 d PBSC NS 1.13(1.04–1,24) < 0.01 PD vs CR Global 1.22 (1.1–1.32) < 0.01 1.15 (1.07–1.25) < 0.01 PBSC 1.2 (1.1–1,3) < 0.01 1.14 (1.05–1.24) < 0.01 Previous HSCT: yes vs no Global 1.27 (1.02–1,59) 0,04 1.25 (1.01–1.55) 0.04 AGVHD : Grade II vs 0-I PBSC 1.21 (1–1.47) 0,05 NS AGVHD : Grade III-IV vs 0-I Global 1,28 (1,14–1,43) < 0.01 1.12 (1–1.25) 0.04 PBSC 1.3 (1.14–1.47) < 0.01 1.13 (1–1.28) 0.05 cGVHD : yes vs no Global 0.2 (0.14–0.28) < 0.01 0.25 (0.19–0.35) < 0.01 PBSC 0.19 (0.13–0.28) < 0.01 0.25 (0.18–0.34) < 0.01

scholarly journals Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults with Ph-like ALL

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3955-3955
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Aldoss ◽  
Dongyun Yang ◽  
Zhaohui Gu ◽  
Vanina Tomazian ◽  
Sally Mokhtari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Relapse Rate ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
R Package ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL) represents 20% of newly diagnosed adults with B cell ALL (B-ALL), with increased frequency in adults with Hispanic ethnicity. Ph-like ALL harbors a diverse range of genetic alterations with CRLF2-rearrangement/overexpression (CRLF2r) being the most common one. When treated with chemotherapy, Ph-like ALL is associated with inferior response, high relapse rate, and low overall survival (OS). Allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is a well-established curative modality for adults with high-risk ALL. Considering that Ph-like ALL is a high-risk leukemia subtype, it is appealing to recommend alloHCT consolidation routinely for this entity in adults. However, large datasets describing alloHCT outcomes in patients with Ph-like ALL is lacking. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed archived DNA samples from 125 consecutive adult patients with Ph-negative ALL who underwent alloHCT in complete remission (CR) at our center between 2006 and 2020. Classification of Ph-like versus non-Ph-like was performed according to WHO 2017 classification using accumulative results from RNAseq, conventional cytogenetics, FISH, and whole genome array studies. A proprietary RNA sequencing assay covering 1,188 genomic regions from 235 genes was designed to detect all the clinically significant fusions and expressions for Ph-like ALLs. In addition, an algorithm employing the RNAseq data was developed to further aid in classification of Ph-like ALL. Boruta feature selection (R package "Boruta" version 7.0.0) was used to identify the most informative genes for prediction with an out-of-bag error of 9.62%. The following 24 genes were identified: CCND2, SOX11, PAX5, DENND3, RARA, MME, ID4, SH3BP5, HOXA9, CA6, MUC4, CYB5R2, CD97, EPOR, IL2RA, RAB29, PDGFRA, MLLT4, RHOA, JAK2, DNM2, ASXL1, BCL2A1, and KDR. The results were used to predict Ph-like status by a Random Forest model (R package "randomForest" version 4.6-14) that generates a probability/similarity score of Ph gene expression profile (Ph score). The testing samples with Ph score over 50% and without other subtype-defining lesions are defined as Ph-like. We identified Ph-like genetic alterations in 66 (53%) patients, of whom 42 (66%) were carrying CRLF2r and 24 (36%) were non-CRLF2r. Compared to non-Ph-like ALL (n=59), Ph-like ALL patients were younger (42 vs 36 years old, p=0.022), more frequently Hispanic (56% vs 83%, p=0.003), less frequently carried high-risk cytogenetics (39% vs 9%, p&lt;0.001), more frequently induced with pediatric-inspired regimens (25% vs 61%, p=0.003) and more likely required &gt;1 regimen to achieve their first complete remission (CR1; 30% vs 55%, p=0.025). However, we did not detect any significant difference between the two groups in disease status (CR1 vs. CD2/3; p=0.81) or minimal residual disease clearance at the time of HCT (negative vs. positive; p=0.17), donor type (match related/unrelated vs mismatch vs haplo vs cord blood; p=0.88), conditioning regimen intensity (myeloablative vs non-myeloablative/ reduced intensity; p=0.59), GVHD prophylaxis (tacrolimus/sirolimus-based vs PTCy-based; p=0.84), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS; p=0.24) or HCT comorbidity index (0 vs 1-2 vs &gt;2; p=0.42). With the median follow-up of 3.2 years, we observed similar 3-years leukemia-free survival (LFS) (40% vs 47%; p=0.95), OS (44% vs 54%; p=0.96), relapse rate (33% vs 34%; p=0.96) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) (27% vs 19%; p=0.92) between non-Ph-like and Ph-like ALL patients, respectively. (Figure) In multivariable analysis, disease status at the time of HCT (HR=2.63, 95% CI: 1.57-4.41; p&lt;0.001), donor type (p=0.049) and KPS (HR=2.22, 95% CI: 1.05-4.69; p=0.038) influenced OS. LFS was significantly influenced by disease status (HR=2.35, 95% CI: 1.45-3.80); p&lt;0.001) and conditioning regimen intensity (HR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.11-3.04; p=0.017). Relapse rate was associated with disease status (HR=2.06, 95%CI: 1.11-3.84; p=0.23) and conditioning regimen intensity (HR=1.97, 95% CI: 1.03-3.75; p=0.40). Only KPS (HR=6.56, 95% CI: 2.48-17.36; P&lt;0.001) was associated with NRM. In conclusion, our data suggest that alloHCT consolidation results in favorable outcomes in adult patients with Ph-like ALL with comparable outcomes to non-Ph-like ALL. Our data support utilization of alloHCT for adults with Ph-like ALL in CR. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Al Malki: Neximmune: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Hansa Biopharma: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy. Khaled: Omeros: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Current Employment; Astellas: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria. Ali: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; CTI BioPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Aribi: Seagen: Consultancy. Mei: BMS: Research Funding; Epizyme: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; EUSA: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Morphosys: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding. Koller: Novartis: Consultancy. Artz: Radiology Partners: Other: Spouse has equity interest in Radiology Partners, a private radiology physician practice. Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Speakers Bureau. Marcucci: Abbvie: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings; Novartis: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings; Agios: Other: Speaker and advisory scientific board meetings. Forman: Lixte Biotechnology: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Mustang Bio: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Allogene: Consultancy. Pullarkat: AbbVie, Amgen, Genentech, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen, Dova, and Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Mixed Chimerism at Three Months after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Is a Significant Predictor of Disease Relapse in High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in First Complete Remission

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2577-2577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricette Michallet ◽  
Mohamad Sobh ◽  
Hélène Labussière-wallet ◽  
Marie Balsat ◽  
Caroline Lejeune ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Mixed Chimerism ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potential curative strategy for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. However, the risk for disease recurrence following allo-HSCT remains significant and associated with poor outcomes. The ability to predict relapse before detectable morphologic recurrence may allow for preemptive interventions, such as immune modulation, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), or initiation of hypomethylating agents, to potentially augment graft-versus-leukemia effect. Post-transplantation peripheral blood chimerism analysis, represents a potential tool to predict disease recurrence, although a validated consensus on the use of this technique in the post-allo-HSCT follow-up has not been established yet and its precise role in this setting remains unclear. The aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of chimerism evaluation 3 months after allo-HSCT in AML patients who were in first complete remission (CR1) before transplantation and remained in clinical and morphological CR at day 90 post-transplantation, on overall survival (OS) and relapse incidence. Patients and methods: We evaluated 194 AML patients who received allo-HSCT at our center between January 2006 and December 2014 and for whom chimerism follow-up has been performed at 3 months. There were 103 (53%) males and 91 (47%) females with a median age of 43 years (range: 18-67). Patients were classified according to the European LeukemiaNet classification for cytogenetic and molecular biology markers (Dohner et al. Blood 2010), accordingly, 64% patients were unfavorable and 36% were in intermediate II risk group. At allo-HSCT, all patients were in CR1; 136 (70%) received a full intensity conditioning (MAC) and 58 (30%) received a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). HSC donors were 72 (37%) HLA identical siblings (44 BM and 36 PBSC), 54 (28%) 10/10 HLA matched unrelated donors (35 BM and 19 PBSC), 33 (17%) 9/10 HLA mismatched unrelated donors (16 BM and 17 PBSC) and 35 (18%) double cord blood units (only 7 were 6/6 HLA matched). Chimerism analysis was performed on marrow and/or blood samples every month following allo-HSCT using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based on informative polymorphic short tandem repeat, a mixed chimerism was defined by having 5% or more of recipient cells. Results: At day 90 after transplantation, all patients remained in clinical and cytological CR at time of chimerism evaluation, 155 (80%) had a full donor chimersim (FDC) and 39 (20%) had a mixed chimerism (MC) ranging from 65% to 95% of donor cells. Among patients with MC, 9 (23%) received increasing doses of DLI (5 of them reached FDC at 6 months), while 20 (51%) could not receive DLI (7 because transplanted from cord blood, and 13 because of the presence of GVHD), the rest of patients were left with a transient MC and regained FDC during follow-up. After a median follow-up of 34 months (range: 4-96) for the surviving patients, the median OS in patients with FDC was not reached with a 3 years probability of 62% (95% CI: 58-66), and for patients with MC, it was 18 months (12-24) with a 3 years probability of 32% (95% CI: 23-41), (p=0.01). Twenty-two patients in the MC group have progressed during the follow-up and 17 among them died from disease progression. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 25% (95% CI: 21-29) for FDC patients and it was 70% (95% CI: 62-80) for MC patients, (p<0.001). The impact of mixed chimerism was still valid in multivariate analysis after including patient age, type of donor, HSC source and risk group, and was independent from the intensity of the conditioning regimen with a Hazard Ratio of 4.7, and a 95% CI: 2.6-8.4, p<0.001. Conclusion: We demonstrated that chimerism evaluation at day 90 after allo-HSCT is an independent predictor of disease relapse in patients who remain in CR at that time and significantly impacts on long term survival. The standardization of this evaluation may lead to the identification of patients with high-risk of relapse risk suggesting the need of early preemptive intervention. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia Outcomes Remain Dismal Despite Novel Agents and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 266-266
Author(s):  
Sagar Patel ◽  
Saulius K. Girnius ◽  
Binod Dhakal ◽  
Lohith Gowda ◽  
Raphael Fraser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare plasma cell neoplasm with a high mortality rate. There have been improvements in multiple myeloma (MM) outcomes with novel induction agents and use of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with maintenance, but similar progress has not been reported for pPCL. We examined the outcomes of pPCL patients receiving novel agents with autologous (autoHCT) or allogeneic (alloHCT) approaches as reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) in the modern era. Methods From 2008 to 2015, 348 pPCL pts underwent HCT (N = 277 - autoHCT and 71 - alloHCT) with 45% and 48% having research level data available, respectively. Cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse/progression (REL), and probability of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Cox multivariate regression was used to model survival after autoHCT only. Median follow-up in autoHCT and alloHCT was 48 and 60 months, respectively. Results AutoHCT Cohort Median age was 60 years and 93% received HCT within 12 months of diagnosis with 76% after a single line of induction (Table 1). 35% had high risk cytogenetics. 23% received bortezomib, doxorubicin, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (VDPACE). Moreover, 40% received bortezomib (BTZ) and immunomodulatory drug (IMIID)-based triplets. Disease status at HCT was VGPR or better in 47%. 27% received maintenance therapy. At 4 years post-HCT, NRM was 7% (4-11%), REL 76% (69-82%), PFS 17% (13-23%), and OS 28% (22-35%) (Figures 1A, 2A, 2B). Disease status ≥VGPR at HCT and Karnofsky Performance Score &gt;90 significantly predicted superior OS in multivariate analysis. AlloHCT Cohort Median age was 53 years and 89% received HCT within 12 months of diagnosis (Table 1). 61% received a single alloHCT, while 39% used auto-alloHCT tandem approach. 42% had high-risk cytogenetics. 61% received total body irradiation with 44% receiving myeloablative conditioning. Use of VDPACE was higher at 41% in this cohort. VGPR status at HCT was similar (48%), while maintenance was used less often (12%). Grade II-IV acute GVHD occurred in 30% and chronic GVHD in 45%. At four years post-HCT, NRM was 12% (5-21%), REL 69% (56-81%), PFS 19% (10-31%), and OS 31% (19-44%) (Figures 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B). There were no differences in outcomes based on type of HCT. A comparison of post-HCT outcomes of CIBMTR pPCL patients from 1995 to 2006 showed that PFS and OS outcomes are inferior despite lower NRM in this modern cohort (Mahindra et al. Leukemia. 2012). In addition, analysis of SEER (1995-2009) and CIBMTR databases showed that use of HCT increased from 12% (7-21%) in 1995 to 46% (34-64%) in 2009. Conclusion More newly diagnosed pPCL patients are receiving modern induction regimens translating into a higher proportion receiving HCT, but without significant further benefit post-HCT. Post-HCT relapse remains the biggest challenge and further survival in pPCL will likely need a combination of targeted and cell therapy approaches. This study provides a benchmark for future HCT studies for pPCL. Disclosures Girnius: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Dhakal:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Shah:University of California, San Francisco: Employment; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Oncopeptides, Karoypharm, Surface Oncology, Precision biosciences GSK, Nektar, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teneobio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Qazilbash:Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Bioclinical: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; Genzyme: Other: Speaker. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. D'Souza:EDO-Mundapharma, Merck, Prothena, Sanofi, TeneoBio: Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; Pfizer, Imbrium, Akcea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hari:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Vault: Equity Ownership; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant after Reduced Intensity Conditioning Provides Outcomes Comparable HLA-Matched Siblings for Patients with High Risk and Advanced Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 606-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio G. Brunstein ◽  
Daniela Setubal ◽  
Marcie Tomblyn ◽  
Todd DeFor ◽  
Mukta Arora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
P Value ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cell Dose ◽  
Matched Sibling ◽  
Total Body

Abstract Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a standard treatment for patients with high risk or advanced AML. However, older age and of co-morbidities frequently limit its use due to high risk of regimen related toxicities (RRT) after a myeloablative regimen. While the inception of RIC regimens has been very successful at reducing RRT, lack of available HLA matched sibling or unrelated donors has become the principal limiting factor. We hypothesized that UCB would increase the utilization of HSCT in patients with AML who lacked a HLA-matched, medically suitable sibling donor. Therefore, we evaluated the various transplant outcomes in 64 AML patients treated with RIC followed by transplantation with HLA-matched sibling PBSC (n=21) and 4–6/6 HLA matched UCB (n=43). All pts received Fludarabine (Flu, 200 mg/kg) and total body irradiation (TBI 200 cGy) with either cyclophosphamide (Cy 50 mg/kg, n=49) or Busulfan (Bu 8 mg/kg, n=15). All pts received cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil GVHD prophylaxis. UCB grafts were composed of 1 (n=15) or 2 (n=28) units to achieve the minimum cell dose. Patients with good and intermediate risk cytogenetics in first complete remission (CR1) were classified as standard risk; others were classified as high risk. Multivariate models considered: donor type, age, disease status, weight, CMV serostatus, cytogenetic risk, disease risk, acute GVHD, conditioning regimen, and time from diagnosis to HSCT. The proportion of engraftment (88% vs. 100%, p=0.10), the incidence of grade II–IV GVHD at day 100 (51% vs. 62%, p=0.85) and TRM at 1 year (28% vs 38%, p=0.43) did not differ between UCB and PBSC recipients. Similarly, relapse at 2 years (UCB 35% vs SIB 35%, p=0.72) and 2 year survival (UCB 31% vs SIB 32%, p=0.62) were comparable. In multivariate analysis, only disease risk group was associated with increased relative risk (RR) of relapse (RR 2.9, 95%CI, 1.3–6.2, p&lt;0.01) and death (RR 2.6, 95%CI, 1.1–5.5, p=0.02). These results demonstrate that partially HLA matched UCB after RIC markedly extends the availability of HSCT with results comparable to those observed with PBSC from HLA matched sibling donors. Variable UCB (n=43) SIB PBSC (n=21) p value * Cell doses of double UCB grafts=combined cell dose. Age in years - median (range) 53 (22–68) 54 (19–69) 0.77 Weight in kg - median (range) 75 (53–120) 72 (51–112) 0.24 Recipient/Donor CMV + 20 (47%)/− 13 (62%)/8 (38%) &lt;0.01 HLA-match 6/6* 5 (7%) 21 (100%) HLA-match 4–5/6* 66 (93%) Zero Disease status CR1 18 (43%) 14 (67%) Cytogenetics good/intermediate 32 (84%) 10 (48%) 0.31 Cytogenetics poor risk 7 (16%) 10 (48%) TNC X10 7/kg median (range)* 3.6 (1.6–5.9) 93.4 (64.8–212.3) CD34 X105/kg median (range)* 4.9 (1.1–18.8) 52.2 (14.1–153.7) Median follow-up in years 2.7 (0.7–5.5) 1.3 (0.7–6.1)

Impact of the Donor Recipient Sex Combination in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: H-Y as a Model for the Interaction between Major and Minor Histocompatibility Antigens.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 481-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alois Gratwohl ◽  
Martin Stern ◽  
Ronald Brand ◽  
Theo de Witte ◽  
Anna Sureda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cord Blood ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Histocompatibility Antigens ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Minor Histocompatibility Antigens ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The importance of minor histocompatibility antigens (miHAg) on outcome in hematopoietic stem cell trans-plantation (HSCT) is well described. H-Y encoded miHAg’s were one of the first to be identified as clinically relevant genetic factors outside HLA. A higher risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in male recipients of female grafts, specific H-Y directed T-cell responses and antibody reactivity have been documented. As a beneficial effect, a reduced risk of relapse has been observed. Still, the role of H-Y miHAg’s has been disputed in some studies. We studied the effects of the donor recipient sex combination of 63′609 patients (59% male, 41% female, median age 33 years, range 0 to 77 years) with an allogeneic HSCT transplanted between 1980 and 2005 and reported to the EBMT. Main diagnoses were acute leukemias (32′671; 51%), chronic leukemias (15′167; 24%), lymphomas (3901; 6%), plasma cell disorders (1643; 3%), MDS/MPS (5′678; 9%) and aplastic anemia (4459; 7%). Patients were stratified by disease, disease stage (good (55%), intermediate (26%), high risk (19%)), stem cell source (bone marrow (62%), peripheral blood (36%), cord blood (2%)), age (<20 years (27%), 20–40 years (41%), >40 (32%) years), donor age (<20 (21%), >20 (79%) years), conditioning intensity (myeloablative (86%), RIC (14%) and year of transplant. Endpoints analysed were cumulative risks of transplant related mortality (TRM) or relapse (REL) and probability of survival. Results of multivariate analyses are presented. There was a 15% higher relative risk of TRM in male patients receiving a female donor (RMDF) transplant compared to all other gender combinations (RR 1.15; 1.12–1.19). Despite a 9% significant reduction in relapse (RR 0.91; 0.88–0.95), overall survival remained worse (RR 1.08; 1.05–1.11). A higher TRM for RMDF was seen over all calendar years, in all disease categories, disease stages, age classes and with all stem cell sources, with a few distinct exceptions: it was not seen in patients with donors <20 years (RR 0.98; 0.9–1.1), it was not observed in patients with lymphoma (RR 1.06; 0.93–1.20) and it was not observed in the cord blood cohort (RR 0.8; 0.62–1.04). In view of the discordant effects on TRM and REL, the relative impact on survival varied, depending on disease, disease stage and age; e.g., survival was similar in high risk patients for the RMDF and “other” group. Moreover, the higher TRM with RMDF was limited to HLA-identical sibling transplants (RR 1.22; 1.17–1.26) and matched unrelated transplants (RR 1.22; 1.13–1.32). It was neither observed in mismatched related (RR 0.97; 0.87–1.08) nor in mismatched unrelated HSCT (RR 1.03; 0.91–1.18). These data clarify the role of the donor recipient sex combination and form the basis for donor selection algorithms. In addition, they substantiate the close interaction between major and minor histocompatibility antigens: the higher the degree of matching for HLA-antigens, the higher the impact of H-Y difference. It is likely, that the same mechanisms will hold true for other miHAg’s as well.

Effectiveness of Reduced Toxicity Conditioning Regimen with Intravenous Busulfan Plus Pentostatin (BUPENT) in Patients Older Than 50 Years with Advanced Hematologic Malignancies.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3331-3331
Author(s):  
Tulio E. Rodriguez ◽  
Mala Parthasarathy ◽  
Scott E. Smith ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
Zachary M. Earley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Reduced Toxicity

Abstract Abstract 3331 Poster Board III-219 Introduction Current data suggests that recipient age above 50 is associated with an inferior outcome after myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Overall survival (OS) of 31%, and transplant related mortality (TRM) of 17% at 100 days have been reported in this population (Ditchkowski, et al 2005; Yanada, et al. 2004). Encouraging results are observed with non-myeloablative conditioning regimens. However, for patients with a high relapse risk, this approach may not be sufficient to achieve long term disease control. In these cases, a reduced toxicity, yet ablative stem cell transplantation (RT-SCT) may give adequate time to the transplanted cells to mature and mount an immune-mediated antitumor response. This study evaluated the outcome after RT-SCT using a conditioning regimen consisting of intravenous busulfan (Bu) and pentostatin (Pent). Methods Consented adult patients up to 70 years with a fully-matched related (MRD) or unrelated donor (MUD) were screened for enrollment. Conditioning consisted of Bu 1.6 mg/kg every 12 hours days -7 to -4, and Pent 4 mg/m2 on day -3 and -2 prior to stem cell infusion on day 0. GVHD prophylaxis was methotrexate 10 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5 mg/m2 on days 3, and 6. Tacrolimus was started on day -2, and then tapered over 1 month after day +100. Characteristics Twenty six patients were analyzed. Male to female ratio was 1:1. Stem cell source was from MRD in 15 patients and MUD in 11. Median age was 62, with 92% of patients being older than 50 years. Indications for treatment were AML (35%), MDS (42%), Refractory CLL (23%), Relapsed NHL (12%), and Philadelphia (+) ALL (4%). All AML patients were high risk either due to poor cytogenetic, transformation, or relapse and only two of them were transplanted in first complete remission. MDS patients were RAEB (36%), secondary MDS (36%), or multilineage dysplasia (18%). Two patients had prior autologous transplants. Results No graft failure was observed. All patients achieved neutrophil (NEU) engraftment. Two patients expired prior to platelet (PLT) engraftment. Median engraftment days for NEU and PLT were 13 days. At a median follow up of 25 months, the OS and progression free survival for the entire group was 40% and 38% respectively. The OS in the MRD group was 58%. TRM at 100 days was seen in one patient (4%) due to veno-occlusive disease (VOD). Limited chronic GVHD was the most common observed toxicity (54%), followed by diarrhea (30%) and mucositis (23%). Mucositis was mainly grade 1 (8%) and grade 2 (8%). No grade 3 mucositis was observed. There was only one case of VOD and one case of acute GVHD. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first report of a RT-SCT using BuPent. This study demonstrates the efficacy of the regimen in patients older than 50 years. No graft failure was observed and the regimen related toxicity was acceptable in this high-risk population. The overall survival of 40% at a median follow up of 25 months compares favorably with prior reports of myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplatation in patients older than 50 years. This regimen provides an exciting opportunity to extend the benefits of allogenic transplant to an older population, and warrants replication with larger controlled trials. Disclosures Rodriguez: Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Vesole:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document