Genetic and Molecular Characterization of Ibrutinib-Resistant Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Designing Innovative Therapeutic Strategies

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1838-1838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Guo ◽  
Shengjian Huang ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Carrie J Li ◽  
Jack Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Biological Functions ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Resistant Patient ◽  
Ibrutinib Resistance

Abstract Background Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a B-cell malignancy with a broad spectrum of clinical, pathological, and biological features, and clinical evolution is usually very aggressive with short responses to treatment and frequent relapses. Ibrutinib is considered the drug of choice in relapsed-refractory cases but patients may develop resistance as some patients in complete remission (CR) have not relapsed yet and are in long term follow-up. The understanding of the resistance mechanisms and the emergence of new drugs targeting key oncogenic mechanisms are providing the basis for designing innovative therapeutic strategies to overcome ibrutinib resistance, both in preclinical studies and preliminary clinical trials. Methods We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in 7 ibrutinib-primary resistant MCL patient samples compared with 16 ibrutinib-sensitive MCL patient samples by next generation sequencing (RNA-Seq) and top28-gene signature were developed via Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) analysis of RNA-Seq data, and we also verified the expression level of these genes in ibrutinib-resistant and-sensitive MCL patient samples using Real time-PCR, and then a secondary focus of this study was to identify potential predictive biomarkers for therapy in relapsed or refractory MCL. In order to place the gene expression data into a biological context, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software was used to assign the DEGs to know the canonical pathways and functional networks in order to predict the biological functions of the transcriptional changes. Results We identified top-28 DEGs in five ibrutinib-resistant MCL patient samples compared with four ibrutinib-sensitive MCL patient samples. We performed gene enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway (KEGG pathway) of differentially expressed genes of each samples and verified the predicted genes using Real time-PCR, which were truly related to MCL and not false positive results. Moreover, Using IPA software, we identified that the enriched biological functions in the MCL ibrutinib-resistant patient samples were Oxidative phosphorylation, Mitochondrial Dysfunction and TCA Cycle (Eukaryotic), which were enriched biological functions in the analysis of RNA-Seq data, and which may be targeted by oncogenic events in MCL, and they may influence the tumor response to new therapeutic agents. We also found that expression of these genes (SEPT3, FASN, IDH3A, SLC1A5, INPP5J, CCT5, MTHFD1) was significantly increased in five ibrutinib-resistant MCL patient samples compared with four ibrutinib-sensitive MCL patient samples, and we used IPA to identify some functionally related genes with these genes increased in MCL ibrutinib-resistant patient samples and built networks based on the molecular relationships most relevant to this project. Conclusion These data identify a genomic basis for ibrutinib-primary resistance in MCL and provide the important insights into the strategy to address the problem of ibrutinib-resistance, and will hopefully allow more tailored and specific therapies to be designed. Disclosures Wang: Onyx: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Asana BioSciences: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Radioimmunotherapy for Mantle Cell Lymphoma: 5-Year Follow-up of 90 Patients from the International RIT-Registry

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5263-5263
Author(s):  
Karin Hohloch ◽  
Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Roberto E. Cacchione ◽  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell

To assess the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with 90yttrium-ibrutinib-tiuxetan (90Y-IT) in mantle cell lymphoma, data from 90 patients registered in the RIT Network with a median follow-up (FU) of 5.5 years after RIT were evaluated. 90Y-IT was given as first-line therapy in 45 (50%) (consolidation 44 pts., primary therapy 1 pt.) and at relapse in 45 (50%) patients (consolidation 24 pts., recurrence 12 pts., therapy refractory 3 pts., conditioning 2 pts., other 4 pts.). As a first-line treatment, 30 patients (pts.) (67%) achieved CR, 10 pts. (22%) PR%., 1 pt. (2%) PD, and for 4 pts. (9%) no response data was available. At relapse, CR was achieved in 17 pts. (38%), PR in 6 pts. (13%), SD in 2 pts. (4%), and 6 pts. (13%) had PD, while the response was not documented for 14 pts. (31%). After a median FU of 5.5 years, median PFS for all patients was 2.11 (95%CI: 1.03-2.32) years, and median OS was 4.05 (95%CI 2.79-7.21) years. Eleven pts. (12.2%) developed second malignancy. In conclusion, this is the largest report of MCL pts. treated with 90Y-IT to date. 90Y-IT was most often used as consolidation after first- and second-line chemotherapy and may improve the results achieved using chemoimmunotherapy alone. However, the results are less encouraging compared to treatment with small molecules such as ibrutinib. Disclosures Zinzani: TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy. Jurczak:Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Loxo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celtrion: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Truemper:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy. Scholz:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Hexal: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; GILEAD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankio: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Yttrium 90 (90Y) Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin) is approved for treatment of patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma and as consolidation therapy after chemo(immuno)therapy of patients with follicular lymphoma.

Alternating Courses of 3x CHOP and 3x DHAP Plus Rituximab Followed by a High Dose ARA-C Containing Myeloablative Regimen and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) Is Superior to 6 Courses CHOP Plus Rituximab Followed by Myeloablative Radiochemotherapy and ASCT In Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results of the MCL Younger Trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network (MCL net)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 110-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Hermine ◽  
Eva Hoster ◽  
Jan Walewski ◽  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
Nicole Brousse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 110 Background: Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) has been characterized by poor long term prognosis with a median survival of only 3 to 4 years. However, outcome has improved during the last decades. In its first randomized trial, the MCL net demonstrated that myeloablative consolidation followed by ASCT resulted in a significant prolongation of PFS in advanced stage MCL (Dreyling et al Blood 2005). Recent phase II studies suggested that the addition of rituximab to CHOP like chemotherapy and/or high dose ARA-C may significantly improve remission rates and PFS. A French phase II trial using sequential R-CHOP/R-DHAP followed by ASCT showed an overall response rate of 95% with a CR rate of 61% translating into a median EFS of 83 months and a 75% survival rate at 5 years (Delarue et al ASH 2008). Methods: To evaluate the potential superiority of a high dose ARA-C containing regimen, the MCL net initiated a randomized trial comparing 6 courses of CHOP plus Rituximab followed by myeloablative radiochemotherapy (12 Gray TBI, 2×60mg/kg Cyclophosphamide) and ASCT (control arm A) versus alternating courses of 3x CHOP and 3x DHAP plus Rituximab followed by a high dose ARA-C containing myeloablative regimen (10 Gray TBI, 4×1,5 g/m2 Ara-C, 140mg/m2 melphalan) and ASCT (experimental arm B). Patient eligibility criteria included previously untreated MCL stage II-IV up to the age of 65 years. Histological diagnosis was confirmed by a central pathology review board. The primary end point time to treatment failure (TTF) was monitored continuously by a sequential procedure based on a one sided triangular test. Stable disease after induction, progression or death from any causes, were considered as treatment failure. Sample size was calculated to detect a hazard ratio of 52% for arm B with a power of 95%. Randomization was stopped as soon as a significant difference was observed between the two arms. Results: From July 2004 to May 2010, 497 patients were randomized in 4 countries (Germany, France, Poland, Belgium). The 391 patients evaluable for the primary analysis (19 no MCL, 87 not yet documented) displayed similar characteristics in both treatment arms: median age 55 vs 56 years, male 78% vs 79%, stage IV 85% vs 79%, B symptoms 43% vs 33%, ECOG >2 5% vs 5%, elevated LDH 37% vs 38%, and MIPI low/int/high risk 61%/25%/14% vs 62%/23%/15%, respectively. After induction overall response was similarly high in both arms (A: 90% vs B: 94%; p=0.19) and CR rate and combined CR/CRu rate were significantly higher in arm B (26% vs 39%; p=0.012 and 41% vs 60%; p=0.0003). The number of patients transplanted was similar in both arms (72% vs 73%) and after transplantation overall response and CR rates were comparable in both arms (97% vs 97% and 63% vs 65%, respectively). After a median follow up of 27 months, patients in arm B experienced a significantly longer TTF (49 months vs NR; p=0.0384, hazard ratio 0.68) mainly due to a lower number of relapses after CR/CRu/PR (20% vs 10%), whereas the rate of ASCT-related deaths in remission was similar in both arms (3% vs 4%). Although CR rate after ASCT was comparable in both arms, remission duration (RD) after ASCT was superior in Arm B (48m vs NR; p=0.047). Interestingly, for patients in CR after ASCT, RD after ASCT was also presumably superior in arm B (51 months vs NR; p=0.077). At the time of analysis overall survival was similar in both arms with medians not reached and 79% vs. 80% survival rates at 3 years (p=0.74). Safety after induction was comparable in both arms except for an increased grade 3/4 hematological toxicity (Hb 8% vs 28%, WBC 48% vs 75%, platelets 9% vs 74%, respectively), an excess of renal toxicity (creatinine grade 1/2: 8% vs 38%, grade 3/4: none vs 2%), and more frequent grade 1/2 nausea and vomiting in arm B. Toxicities of both conditioning regimen were similar, except for higher grade 3/4 mucositis (43% vs. 61%) in Arm B, and higher grade 1/2 liver toxicity and constipation in Arm A. Conclusions: High dose ARA-C in addition to R-CHOP+ASCT increases significantly complete response rates and TTF without clinically relevant increase of toxicity. Therefore, induction regimen containing high dose ARA-C followed by ASCT should become the new standard of care of MCL patients up to 65 years. Disclosures: Walewski: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Stilgenbauer:Amgen: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding. Feugier:roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bosly:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gisselbrecht:Roche: Research Funding.

Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Relapsing After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Study of the EBMT

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 474-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sascha Dietrich ◽  
Herve Finel ◽  
Ariane Boumendil ◽  
Irit Avivi ◽  
Liisa Volin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
One Year

Abstract Abstract 474 BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) is considered as standard treatment for non-frail patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, little is known about outcome of MCL recurrence after autoSCT. We therefore conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with MCL who failed autoSCT using the EBMT database. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE was to analyse outcome and prognostic factors after relapse following autoSCT for MCL in the rituximab era. PRIMARY ENDPOINT was overall survival (OS) from relapse. ELIGIBLE were patients aged 18 years or more who relapsed following an autoSCT for MCL performed between 2000 and 2010 and who were registered with the EBMT. Centres were contacted to provide additional information on relapse treatment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS was based on log-rank comparisons and multivariable testing using Cox regression models. RESULTS: 1054 patients meeting the eligibility criteria could be identified in the EBMT registry. Of these, a full data set could be retrieved for 382 patients. Sixteen patients had to be excluded due to loss of follow up (n=7), wrong diagnosis (n=6), or falsely reported relapse (n=3). Median age at autoSCT of 366 evaluable patients was 59 years (range: 37 to 76), 290 patients (79%) were men. 64% had undergone autoSCT as part of 1st-line therapy; 68% and 49% had documented exposure to rituximab (RTX) and high-dose ara-C (HA) before autoSCT; and 12% had had refractory disease at autoSCT. Median time from autoSCT to relapse was 20 months (range: 0.4 to 117). 21 relapses (6%) occurred beyond 5 years after autoSCT. With a median observation time of 37 months (95% CI 32–43), median OS after relapse of the whole study group was 20 months. By univariate analysis, a long (>12mo) interval between autoSCT and relapse (p<0.001; HR 0.26; Figure 1A), 1st-line autoSCT (p=0.006; HR 0.7) refractory disease at autoSCT (p<0.001, HR 2.0) and more recent year of relapse (p<0.001, HR per year 0.9) significantly influenced OS from relapse, whereas age, gender, RTX and HA exposure did not. By multivariate analysis refractory disease at autoSCT (p<0.001, HR=2.14), remission duration after autoSCT (p<0.001 HR per 3 months 0.88) and calendar year of relapse (p<0.03, HR per year 0.93) were confirmed to be predictors for OS. In addition, HA exposure prior autoSCT adversely affected OS from relapse (p=0.06, HR 1.38). Salvage chemotherapy after relapse resulted in only 31% complete responses and 29% partial responses, whereas 40% of patients have been refractory to first salvage chemotherapy. 83 patients (23%) received an allogeneic SCT (alloSCT), whereas only 7 patients (2%) received a second autoSCT after relapse. Median time after relapse to second SCT was 7 months (range: 1 to 40). Survival after relapse for patients who received a second autoSCT was poor with no long-term survivor. AlloSCT performed for late relapse (>12mo) after autoSCT was associated with superior OS compared to patients who received an allograft upon a shorter remission duration after autoSCT (5-year OS from alloSCT 50% vs 0%; p=0.001; Figure 1B). Achievement of CR before alloSCT (p=0.05 HR=0.5), but not donor source, T-cell depletion or conditioning intensity affected OS after alloSCT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MCL who relapse within one year after autoSCT have an extremely dismal outcome even with alloSCT. In contrast, about half of the patients who have MCL recurrence beyond one year after autoSCT and can undergo salvage alloSCT enjoy long-term survival. It remains to be shown if a similarly good outcome can be achieved without alloSCT in this favourable selection of patients. A 2nd autoSCT does not appear to be a promising option in patients with MCL failing a 1st autoSCT. Disclosures: Walewski: Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cephalon: Research Funding.

Phase II Randomized, Multicenter Study of Lenalidomide Vs Best Investigator’s Choice in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results of the MCL-002 (SPRINT) Study

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 626-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Trneny ◽  
Thierry Lamy ◽  
Jan Walewski ◽  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
David Belada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Response ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Prognostic Profile

Abstract Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with poor outcome, especially after failure of first-line treatment. Lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug with antineoplastic and antiproliferative effects, has shown activity in single-arm phase II studies of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL. The present controlled randomized study compared the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide vs investigator’s choice (IC) in patients with R/R MCL. Methods: MCL-002 (SPRINT), a European multicenter, open-label, phase II study enrolled patients with up to 3 relapses or who failed prior therapy and were ineligible for intensified treatment or stem cell transplantation (NCT00875667). Oral lenalidomide was given at 25 mg/day on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle until progressive disease (PD) or intolerability. The IC treatment consisted of single-agent therapy with cytarabine, rituximab, gemcitabine, fludarabine, or chlorambucil. Patients who progressed on IC per investigator judgment were allowed to crossover to lenalidomide. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), time to first response, duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Response assessments were centrally reviewed using the modified IWG criteria. Results: 254 patients with R/R MCL were randomized 2:1 to lenalidomide (n=170) or IC (n=84). Patients had median age 68.5 years, were predominantly male (73%), and had received a median of 2 prior therapies. 91% had stage III/IV disease at diagnosis, with 34% high-risk MIPI, 43% high tumor burden, and 20% bulky disease at baseline. Overall, patients on the lenalidomide arm had a worse prognostic profile than the IC arm due to higher tumor burden and disease risk (&gt;5 percentage points for a number of parameters). After a median time of 2.9 months, 39 patients (46%) from the IC arm crossed over to lenalidomide due to PD. Overall, 84 patients remain on lenalidomide (15 having crossed over from IC) and 11 patients on IC without PD. At a median follow-up time on study of 15.9 months, the risk reduction for PFS was 39% (HR=0.61 [95% CI, 0.44-0.84]; P=0.004; Table) in favor of lenalidomide (median PFS: 8.7 months lenalidomide vs 5.2 months IC). ORR was significantly improved for lenalidomide vs IC (40% vs 11%; CR/CRu 5% vs 0%). Median time to first response was 4.3 months for lenalidomide (not reached for IC). Median DOR (16.1 vs 10.4 months) and OS on mature data (27.9 vs 21.2 months) were longer for lenalidomide vs IC. Efficacy results were consistent among subgroups. Safety data in 250 patients receiving ≥1 dose showed more dose reductions in lenalidomide-treated patients (41%) vs IC (17%), due in part to a longer median duration of lenalidomide treatment vs IC, and to strict dose modification rules for lenalidomide. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (lenalidomide 44% vs IC 34% [without increased risk of infection]), thrombocytopenia (18% vs 28%), and leukopenia (8% vs 11%). Tumor flare reaction occurred in lenalidomide patients only (10%; 2% grade ≥3); 1 patient in each arm experienced tumor lysis syndrome. Invasive second primary malignancies were identified in 4% and 5% of lenalidomide and IC treated patients, respectively. Conclusions: The MCL-002 study demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS for lenalidomide over best IC monotherapy in patients with advanced R/R MCL despite a worse prognostic profile in the lenalidomide arm at baseline. In addition, ORR and CR rates, TTR, DOR, and OS were improved for lenalidomide over IC. The DOR has been remarkably consistent in various studies with lenalidomide in MCL patients. The safety profile for lenalidomide was as expected and no new safety signals were identified. The results of this first randomized, controlled study of lenalidomide showed superior efficacy compared to IC in patients with R/R MCL with a manageable toxicity profile. Table Efficacy of lenalidomide vs IC in R/R MCL Efficacy Lenalidomide (n=170) IC (n=84) P PFS (Lenalidomide vs IC)  Median PFS, mo (95% CI) 8.7 (5.54-12.14) 5.2 (3.67-6.95)  Sequential HR (95% CI) 0.61 (0.44-0.84)  Sequential log-rank test p-value 0.004 ORR, n (%) 68 (40) 9 (11) &lt;0.001 CR/CRu, n (%) 8 (5) 0 (0) 0.043 Median DOR, mo 16.1 10.4 0.421 Median OS, mo 27.9 21.2 0.52 Disclosures Trneny: Celgene, Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Walewski:Celgene: Consultancy, Other, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Mundipharma : Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding. Jurczak:Celgene, Eisai, Gilead, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Spectrum, Takeda, Teva: Research Funding. Belada:Celgene: Research Funding. Mayer:Janssen Research & Development: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Biyukov:Celgene: Employment. Patturajan:Celgene: Employment. Casadebaig Bravo:Celgene: Employment. Arcaini:Celgene, Roche, Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Systematic Reviews of the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Treatments for Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5868-5868
Author(s):  
Neerav Monga ◽  
Jamie Garside ◽  
Matthew S. Davids ◽  
Constantine S. Tam ◽  
Katherine Ward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Eligible Patient ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Introduction Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare and aggressive form of Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with poor survival outcomes. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is recommended as first-line therapy in younger patients. However the comparative efficacy of such regimens, and of alternative therapy options (for patients unable to tolerate chemotherapy + ASCT), remain unclear. A comprehensive understanding of the current evidence is therefore required. Methods Two systematic reviews (SRs) were developed to identify efficacy and safety data for therapies used in the first-line treatment of MCL. One review identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the other non-randomised studies (NRSs). Searches were carried out in EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials electronic databases. Additionally, conference materials were screened from ASH, EHA, ESMO and ASCO proceedings from the last 2 years. All review methodologies were performed according to Cochrane best practice guidelines Results The RCT SR was run in August 2017 and updated in April 2018. Overall, 2,787 abstracts were screened. The SR included 9 full-text articles and data from 2 conference proceedings, together reporting a total of 7 independent studies. Across the RCTs, the most commonly investigated treatment regimens were rituximab + cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + vincristine + prednisone (R-CHOP), and bendamustine + rituximab (BR). Frequently reported primary endpoints were response rates and progression-free survival (PFS). Table 1 presents the PFS and overall survival (OS) data reported in the included RCTs. Data from the RCT reporting on intensive induction chemotherapy followed by ASCT are separated from regimens that did not include ASCT. There were notable differences in median PFS rates, between both patients receiving ASCT versus patients not receiving ASCT and also between the two ASCT treatment arms. In pharmacotherapy studies, PFS ranged from 14.4 to 35.4 months, whereas the two arms of the ASCT RCT reported 51.6 and 109.2 months, respectively. Similar trends were observed in OS: the only result for patients undergoing ASCT (117.6 months) was higher than any result reported in patients not receiving transplant (range 40 - 60 months). However, study heterogeneity may affect the appropriateness of directly comparing these results. Frequently reported grade 3-4 adverse events included anemia, infusion-related reactions, nausea, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (four of seven RCTs reported each event). The NRS SR was run in April 2018. A total of 3,290 abstracts were screened and 75 full papers were assessed. The SR included 25 full-text articles and 6 conference proceedings, together reporting a total of 18 independent single-arm studies. Several of the NRSs investigated treatment regimens that have not been described in RCT studies, including: R-CHOP with alternating or sequential rituximab + cytarabine (maxiCHOP), and cyclophosphamide + vincristine + doxorubicin + dexamethasone alternating with high dose methotrexate or cytarabine + rituximab (hyperCVAD + R). Across the NRSs, the longest median PFS was 8.5 years (102 months), in patients treated with maxiCHOP (who were young/ASCT-eligible patients). This outcome was reported in a patient population who had responded to induction therapy and were treated with consolidative ASCT. Across all studies there was heterogeneity in the eligible patient population, with some studies focusing on unfit patients and others focusing on high-dose-therapy-eligible patient populations. Many studies also reported maintenance or consolidation treatments, which would influence the long-term outcomes of the patients. Conclusions These SRs highlight the paucity of directly comparable evidence on the efficacy and safety of therapies for patients with MCL. Although there are some marked differences in patient outcomes according to therapy regimen, considerable heterogeneity in study design and patient populations make direct comparison difficult. Despite this, these SRs highlight that MCL remains a difficult subtype of NHL to treat, with short survival highlighting the high unmet need. With new and emerging therapies, additional research is essential to understand optimal regimens for first-line MCL. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures Monga: Janssen Pharmaceutica NV: Employment. Garside:Janssen Pharmaceutica NV: Employment. Davids:Merck: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Surface Oncology: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Tam:BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ward:Janssen Pharmaceutica NV: Consultancy. Quigley:Janssen Pharmaceutica NV: Consultancy. Parisi:Janssen: Employment. Tapprich:Janssen Pharmaceutica NV: Employment.

scholarly journals Pharmacogenomics Drives Lenalidomide Efficacy and MRD Kinetics in Mantle Cell Lymphoma after Autologous Transplantation: Results from the MCL0208 Multicenter, Phase III, Randomized Clinical Trial from the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 16-17
Author(s):  
Simone Ferrero ◽  
Daniele Grimaldi ◽  
Elena Arrigoni ◽  
Gian Maria Zaccaria ◽  
Beatrice Alessandria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Strong Linkage Disequilibrium ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell

Background and Aims. Prediction of treatment efficacy is an active and growing field of pharmacology. In the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) MCL0208 phase III trial (NCT02354313), a 24 months lenalidomide maintenance (LM, 15 mg days 1-21 every 28 days) after high-dose immuno-chemotherapy followed by autologous transplantation (ASCT) in 300 frontline mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients showed substantial clinical activity in terms of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) vs observation (OBS). However, this benefit seemed not uniform across patient series. To deeper investigate the differential pattern of response to lenalidomide, a wide analysis of the host pharmacogenomics (PG) background was planned, in order to dissect whether specific germline polymorphisms of transmembrane transporters, metabolic enzymes or cell surface receptors (ABCB1, ABCG2, VEGFA, FCGR2A, NCF4, GSTP1, CRBN) might predict the drug efficacy. Actually, several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of ABCB1 exert an effect on substrate affinity of lenalidomide for the transmembrane transporter. Moreover, VEGFA is involved in the anti-angiogenic activity of lenalidomide and might eventually upregulate ABCB1 expression, too. Patients and methods. Genotypes for SNPs were obtained through allele-specific (ASO) probes on germline DNA from peripheral blood. Minor allele frequencies (MAFs) were obtained and the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was checked. Genotypes were used to infer individual haplotypes by Arlequin and Haploview softwares. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed with ASO primers on either IGH or BCL-1/IGH rearrangements by RQ-PCR in bone marrow samples. TP53 disruption was identified by NGS targeting resequencing and copy number variation analysis. Clinical-biological correlations were screened by automated machine learning methods and validated by both Kaplan-Meier at univariate level and Cox models for multivariate analysis (MV). A logistic regression was implemented to investigate correlations between polymorphisms and MRD kinetics. Results. 278 out of 300 patients (93%) were fully genotyped. The MAF values of the SNPs were very similar to published data and the HWE was confirmed. Most notably, ABCB1 c.2677G&gt;T/A(W) and VEGFA c.2055A&gt;C were significantly associated to outcome and are thus described in this abstract. In the case of ABCB1, the three loci were in strong linkage disequilibrium (p&lt;0.001). 31% of patients were homozygous for ABCB1 wild type alleles (GG, "WT"), 53% heterozygous (GW, "HET") and 16% polymorphic on both chromosomes (WW, "POL"). 20% were VEGFA WT (AA), 47% HET (AC) and 33% POL (CC). PG did not impact on induction therapy and randomization rates of this trial, as superimposable polymorphism frequencies were described between the enrolled and randomized population. Conversely, both ABCB1 HET and POL and VEGFA HET/POL associated with higher MRD clearance rates vs WT after 6 months of LM (93% vs 71% and 91% vs 67%, respectively). Interestingly, the risk of MRD reappearance during LM was 86% lower for patients harboring either polymorphism vs WT (odds ratio 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.99; p&lt;0.05). Actually, ABCB1 HET/POL predicted for a more favorable PFS vs WT in LM (3yPFS 85% vs 69% p&lt;0.05, Fig.1A), as well as VEGFA HET/POL (3yPFS 85% vs 59% p&lt;0.01, Fig.1B). The two polymorphisms co-occurred in 57% of patients, being 12% ABCB1 HET/POL only, 23% VEGFA HET/POL and 8% ABCB1/VEGFA WT. Interestingly, patients with either polymorphism had superimposable outcome to patients in whom both co-occurred (Fig.1C). Finally, MV showed that either polymorphism was protective for PFS among randomized patients (HR=0.42; 95% CI 0.20-0.85; p&lt;0.05). According to this hypothesis, among the 17 ABCB1/VEGFA WT patients LM did not improved PFS vs OBS (Fig.1D), independently from TP53 disruption. Conclusions. The first PG data on LM after ASCT in MCL suggested that: 1) ABCB1 and VEGFA polymorphisms did not impact on the chemotherapeutic efficacy of FIL-MCL0208 trial; 2) both polymorphisms favored sustained MRD clearance during LM; 3) either polymorphism conferred a survival advantage during LM. Taken together, these observations hint that a variable excretion of lenalidomide through ABCB1 (heralded by SNPs), as well as an altered VEGFA pathway, could predict treatment efficacy. This observation might be very useful in the future to tailor lenalidomide therapy to MCL patients. Disclosures Ferrero: Servier: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Boccomini:SC Ematologia, ASOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy: Current Employment. Maria:Roche: Consultancy, Other: travel, accomodations, expenses; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel, accomodations, expenses; BMS: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: travel, accomodations, expenses; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: travel, accomodations, expenses, Research Funding. Ferreri:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Hutchinson: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Palumbo:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Galimberti:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Lenalidomide maintenance in mantle cell lymphoma

Clinical, Metabolic and Molecular Responses After 4 Courses of R-DHAP and After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients Included in the LyMa Trial, a Lysa Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 152-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Le Gouill ◽  
Mary Callanan ◽  
Elizabeth Macintyre ◽  
marie-Hélène delfau-Larue ◽  
Caroline bodet-Milin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Abstract 152 Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare B-cell malignancy characterized by the t(11;14) translocation. The European MCL network has demonstrated that a sequential R-CHOP/R-DHAP chemotherapy regimen prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) provides better disease control than R-CHOP (Hermine et al, ASH 2010, abstract 110) and that molecular minimal residual disease (MRD) measured by IGH real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) before and after ASCT is an important prognostic factor to predict progression-free survival (PFS) (Pott et al. Blood. 2010;115(16):3215–23). Indeed, the use of high-dose aracytine upfront before ASCT is now recommended and molecular remission appears to be a major objective for future clinical trials in MCL. It therefore appeared interesting to appreciate response rates combining standard evaluation (Cheson 1999), FDG-PET imaging (Cheson 2007) and PCR techniques after rituximab plus upfront high-dose aracytine (R-DHAP) followed by ASCT. Response rates after 4 courses of R-DHAP were one of the objectives of the LyMa trial (NCT00921414). This trial is a randomized, open-label, phase III study that evaluates the efficacy of rituximab maintenance therapy in MCL patients aged between 18 and 66 years old, undergoing first-line treatment with 4xR-DHAP and exhibiting a response after ASCT (R-BEAM). Patients who do not reach a sufficient partial remission after R-DHAP are planned to receive 4 additional courses of R-CHOP before ASCT. The LyMa trial started in September 2008 and was designed to enroll 299 patients over a 4 years period. To date (August 2012), 295 patients have been included. Herein, we report response rates according to the combination of Cheson 1999 and 2007 criteria plus molecular response rates after 4xR-DHAP and after ASCT for the first 200 enrolled patients (last inclusion in August 2011). Results: One patient withdrew consent and the analysis is therefore on 199 patients. The cohort's median age is 57.2 years (range 29.7–65.7) and 41 patients are female (20%). At diagnosis, simplified MIPI was low in 104 cases (52%), intermediate in 55 (28%) and high in 40 (20%).Twenty-five patients (12.5%) presented with a blastoid variant. The panel of pathologist experts confirmed the diagnosis in all reviewed cases. Among the 199 evaluable patients, 182 (91%) received 4 courses of R-DHAP and 12 patients (all in PR according to Cheson 99 criteria) received 4 additional courses of R-CHOP because of insufficient clinical response after R-DHAP. Among these 12 patients, 5 reached CR/CRu after R-CHOP. Ultimately, 164 patients (82%) proceeded to ASCT (158 after R-DHAP and 6 after RDHAP/R-CHOP) and 154 (77.4%) have been randomized between rituximab maintenance or no maintenance. In an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and according to Cheson 1999 criteria, 152 patients (76.3%) reached CR (n=74) or CRu (n=78) after 4 courses of R-DHAP while 25 patients reached PR and 8 presented with SD/Prog. According to Cheson 2007 criteria (n= 170; PET not done in 17 cases and data missing in 12 cases), 129 patients reached CR while 41 patients remained FDG-TEP positive. Response rates according to Cheson 1999 and 2007 criteria for transplanted patients (n=164) were CR (n=109)/CRu (n=45) in 94% and CR in 84.5% (129 patients underwent FDG-PET after ASCT), respectively. Regarding MRD, diagnosis samples were available for 186/199 patients. Forty-one diagnosis samples have not yet been analyzed and 14 proved to be not informative. To date, the molecular response on peripheral blood (PB) after 4 courses of R-DHAP has been assessed in 103 cases and found negative in 80 cases and positive in 22 cases (not evaluable in one case). MRD on bone marrow (BM) after 4 courses of R-DHAP has been measured in 97 cases and found negative in 59 and positive in 36 (not evaluable in one case). After ASCT, PB and BM MRD were found negative in 91 patients (95 samples have been analyzed to date) and 67 (87 samples analyzed), respectively. Thus, in the LyMa trial,CR/CRu rates after only 4 courses of RDHAP, according to Cheson 1999 and 2007 criteria, are very high confirming the major anti-tumoral impact of high-dose aracytine upfront in MCL. In addition, these encouraging results seem to be confirmed at the molecular level strengthening the interest of an MRD-guided management of MCL patients. Results will be updated at the time of the meeting and patients' outcome according to disease status will be presented. Disclosures: Ribrag: Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Phase 1b/2a Open-Label, Multiple-Dose, Dose-Escalation Study To Evaluate The Safety and Tolerability Of Intravenous Infusion Of SNS01-T In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Or Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1950-1950 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A Lust ◽  
Charles Barranco ◽  
Saad Z Usmani ◽  
Frits van Rhee ◽  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Pro Inflammatory Cytokines

Abstract Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A) has been implicated in the regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and inflammation, and is the only known protein to be modified by hypusination. Hypusinated eIF5A, the predominant form of eIF5A in cancer cells, is involved in cell survival and activation of inflammatory pathways. In contrast, accumulation of the unhypusinated form of eIF5A is associated with apoptosis and mutants of eIF5A that cannot be hypusinated (e.g. eIF5AK50R) are pro-apoptotic. SNS01-T was designed to treat B-cell cancers and consists of two active components: a plasmid DNA expressing the pro-apoptotic eIF5AK50R under the control of a B cell-specific promoter, and an siRNA against an untranslated region of native eIF5A mRNA. When these two components are combined with linear polyethyleneimine (PEI), the nucleic acids are condensed into nanoparticles for protection from degradation in the blood and enhanced cellular delivery. The mode of action of SNS01-T is siRNA-mediated inhibition of hypusinated eIF5A and simultaneous over-expression of pro-apoptotic eIF5AK50R to induce cell death. In vitro cell studies and in vivo xenograft studies have demonstrated the efficacy of this approach. The safety and tolerability of intravenous administration of SNS01-T is being investigated in a first-in-human Phase1b/2a study in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Eligible patients are being enrolled sequentially into four cohorts at increasing doses. Each patient receives an intravenous infusion of SNS01-T twice weekly for 6 consecutive weeks. Eligible patients must have been diagnosed with MM according to IMWG criteria, or with MCL or DLBCL with histologic confirmation. Patients also must have measurable disease, have relapsed or refractory disease after two or more prior treatment regimens, have a life expectancy of at least 3 months, and not be eligible to receive any other standard therapy known to extend life expectancy. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple escalating doses of SNS01-T. Secondary objectives include analysis of pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and therapeutic efficacy. The required 3 patients per cohort have completed the dosing schedule in cohorts 1 and 2 from a total of 10 patients enrolled (9 patients with MM and 1 with DLBCL). Of the ten patients enrolled, four completed the full treatment period, two did not complete dosing but were evaluable for safety, and four (three in cohort 1 and one in cohort 2) discontinued treatment after fewer than 8 doses and were not evaluable. There were no drug-related serious adverse events or dose limiting toxicities in either cohort 1 or 2. In cohort 1 (0.0125 mg/kg SNS01-T), two of three evaluable patients did not progress on treatment and were considered stable at week 3 and week 6, the end of the dosing regimen. The third patient progressed after receiving 10 of the 12 doses and was evaluable for safety. In cohort 2 (0.05 mg/kg), 3 patients (2 with MM and 1 with DLBCL) were evaluable for safety. Stabilization of serum monoclonal protein levels was observed in one MM patient of cohort 2. Two patients (1 with MM and 1 with DLBCL) progressed after receiving 8 of the 12 doses and were evaluable for safety. Results from ongoing pharmacokinetic studies, immunogenicity studies, and quantification of pro-inflammatory cytokines will be discussed. The planned dose levels for the third and fourth groups are 0.2 and 0.375 mg/kg, respectively. The results to date of this first-in-human clinical trial indicate that SNS01-T can be administered safely and the MTD has not yet been reached (Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01435720). Disclosures: Barranco: Senesco Technologies: Consultancy. Usmani:Celgene, Onyx, Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. van Rhee:Jansen&Jansen: Research Funding. Thompson:Senesco Technologies: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Taylor:Senesco Technologies: stock options Other. Dondero:Senesco Technologies: Employment. Browne:Senesco Technologies Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene, Millenium, Onyx (same for all): Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Non-Bcl2 Mutations Are Predominant in Patients (pts) with Venetoclax Resistant Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) - Response and Clinical Outcomes in Ultra-Refractory MCL

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2815-2815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preetesh Jain ◽  
Shuangtao Zhao ◽  
Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna ◽  
Lucy Navsaria ◽  
Holly Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Btk Inhibitors

Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients (pts) who progress after ibrutinib and other lines of treatment "ultra-refractory MCL" have poor outcomes and exhibit BTK mutations infrequently (Jain P et al BJH 2018, Martin P et al Blood 2016). Venetoclax has shown promising efficacy in Phase I trial in NHL (Davids M et al JCO 2017) and is now under trials in MCL. Venetoclax response in pts with MCL after progression on ibrutinib was reported (Eyre T et al Haematologica 2018), however, genomic alterations associated with venetoclax resistance are not described. We present our experience in 24 pts with MCL treated with venetoclax and report their mutation profiles associated with progression on venetoclax. Methods: We collected data from 24 pts with MCL who were treated with venetoclax (off clinical trial) as a salvage measure after failing multiple lines of prior therapies. Pt characteristics were collected from the time of initiating venetoclax. Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated from the time of initiating venetoclax to the date of progression or to last follow up date/date of death while overall survival (OS) was calculated from the time of initiating venetoclax to the date of last follow up date/date of death. Post venetoclax survival was calculated from the date of discontinuing venetoclax to the date of last follow up/death. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) with SureSelect Human All Exon V6 was performed from evaluable biopsy samples from 7 pts (5 pts at/before starting venetoclax and 6 pts after progression of venetoclax), this included 5 pts who have pairs available for analysis (pre and post venetoclax). Results: Twenty four pts were treated with venetoclax (12 started as single agent and 8 started with combination with obinutuzumab and 3 with BTK inhibitors with/without obinutuzumab). Four pts had initial single agent venetoclax and later were rechallenged with combinations. Initial dose of venetoclax was dose escalation from 20 mg, then 50 mg then 100 mg PO daily up to 400 mg daily in 18/24 pts while in 3 pts it was 100 mg daily and in another 3 it was 400 mg daily. Median age at venetoclax start was 69 years (58-82). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 5 (range 1-11; including 17 pts who progressed on ibrutinib or other BTK inhibitors, 5 had exposure to ibrutinib and discontinued for intolerance, 4 had prior SCT and 2 had prior anti CD19 cellular therapy). At the baseline (pre/at-venetoclax start), 13 pts (54%) had blastoid/pleomorphic histology and 11 (46%) had classic variant morphology, the median Ki-67% was 60% (5-90%) and pts with Ki-67% ≥ 50 were 11 (55%), 4 pts did not have available Ki-67% values. Overall response rate (ORR) was 65% (13/20) - complete remission 25% (5/20) and partial remission 40% (8/20). Stable disease was observed in 10% (2/10), primary refractory were 25% (5/20). Four pts were not evaluable for response assessment. The median follow up after starting venetoclax was 17.5 months (1-27). The median PFS was 7.7 months (2 year 20%) and the median OS was 13.5 months (2 year 30%) Figure-1A-B. Pts in CR had a PFS of 15 months vs no CR 10 months (p=0.29). At the last follow up, 11 pts remained on venetoclax therapy (4 alive and 7 dead). Overall, 15 pts progressed and 14 pts were alive. The median post venetoclax survival was 6 months. Among 20 pts who discontinued venetoclax, 1 achieved CR and 3 PR on subsequent therapies. Among the 20 pts who discontinued venetoclax, 6 discontinued due to intolerance. In addition, we evaluated the somatic mutation profile in pts who progressed on venetoclax using WES. Figure-1C shows mutation spectrum. In our cohort, pts with MCL who progressed on venetoclax exhibited infrequent Bcl2 mutations (one pt at progression; 14 %; p.H3D) while the mutation frequency of other genes such as TP53 (71% vs. 40%), ATM (43% vs. 20%), KMT2D (57% vs. 20%), CELSR3 (57% vs. 20%), and KMT2C (43% vs. 20%) increased by > 2-fold at progression (compared to pretreatment samples, p=N.S due to small cohort size). The mutation of CARD11 (14%) and SMARCA4 (14%) was only observed at progression. Further details on copy number abnormalities will be presented. Conclusions: Venetoclax has promising results in refractory pts with MCL. Combination clinical trials with obinutuzumab, acalabrutinib are ongoing in MCL. We have characterized mutations and aneuploidy abnormalities in venetoclax resistant MCL pts and shown that unlike CLL, Bcl2 mutations are infrequent in venetoclax resistant MCL. Disclosures Nastoupil: Spectrum: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Westin:Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; 47 Inc: Research Funding. Fowler:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wang:Aviara: Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BioInvent: Consultancy, Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; MoreHealth: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; VelosBio: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Outcomes, Causes of Discontinuation and Mutation Profile of Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Progressed on Acalabrutinib

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4151-4151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preetesh Jain ◽  
Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna ◽  
Shaojun Zhang ◽  
Chi Young Ok ◽  
Makhdum Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Copy Number Alterations ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Introduction: Acalabrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor approved for treatment of relapsed patients (pts) with mantle cell lymphoma. We have reported previously that ibrutinib refractory MCL pts have poor survival. However, outcomes, causes of discontinuation, management and the genomic landscape of MCL in pts who discontinued acalabrutinib are rarely reported. Method: We reviewed charts from all MCL pts treated with single agent acalabrutinib (n=28) in the relapsed setting and identified 15 pts who discontinued acalabrutinib and who are described in this analysis. Outcome after discontinuing acalabrutinib is reported. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) with SureSelect Human All Exon V6 was performed on 10 tumor specimens and 5 matched germline samples collected from 9 pts whose MCL progressed on acalabrutinib; among these pts 4 tumors were collected at baseline and 6 were collected after disease progression. One patient had sufficient DNAs available for both time points (baseline and progression). Results: The median duration on treatment with acalabrutinib was 6.5 months (1 to 29 months) and the median number of cycles of acalabrutinib treatment was 6 (range, 1-30). Seven pts had complete remission (CR) as their best response on acalabrutinib, 5 were primary refractory and 3 achieved partial remission. In 12 pts (80%) acalabrutinib was discontinued due to disease progression (2 pts transformed from classic to blastoid and pleomorphic type at progression) and 3 pts were discontinued due to intolerance (one for fatigue and idiopathic encephalopathy, one due to unrelated severe aortic stenosis and another for cytopenias secondary to therapy related myelodysplasia; all three pts were in CR). Nine pts had classic and 3 pts each had blastoid or pleomorphic features before starting acalabrutinib. Overall, median Ki-67 expression was 50% (range, 5-100) and all pts had high a MIPI score. The median number of prior treatments was 1 (range, 1-3); all chemo-immunotherapy (10 pts were previously treated with rituximab-hyper-CVAD) and none with ibrutinib. Two pts who transformed on acalabrutinib received acalabrutinib for a median duration of 12 months (range, 8-16.5). Median follow up after discontinuation was 27 months and the median survival was 25 months (26 months for progression and 1.5 months for intolerance; p <0.001, Figure-1A). Patients who discontinued due to intolerance did not get subsequent treatment for MCL. Among the 12 pts who progressed on acalabrutinib, 11 pts received systemic therapy for MCL [seven received ibrutinib based therapies (2 non responders, 3 achieved CR and 2 were PR and all pts progressed subsequently), 3 got chemo-immunotherapy and progressed and one pt did not receive any treatment and was lost to follow up and died. Six patients received a clinical trial with CAR-T cells (results will be reported separately). Overall, at the time of last follow up, 8 pts were alive and 7 were in CR. Recurrently mutated genes in these tumors included ATM (6/10; 60%), TP53 (4/10; 40%), KMT2C (3/10), MYCN (2/10), NOTCH1 (2/10), NOTCH3 (2/10), and MEF2B (2/10) (Fig. 1B). We did not detect any mutation or copy number alterations in BTK, PLCG2, TRAF2/3 and MYD88 that have been reported previously to be associated with ibrutinib resistance. Compared to tumors at baseline, ATM was mutated at a higher frequency in samples at progression (67% vs. 50%; p=NS). To investigate the mutation evolution on acalabrutinib treatment, mutation profiles, particularly the mutation variant allelic fractions (VAFs), were compared between the baseline and progression samples from pt-1 (Fig. 1C). Mutation of MYCN, MEF2B, ATM, and NOTCH1 were identified in both tumors at similar VAFs, whereas mutation of CARD11 (two mutations), NLRC5 and B2M were detected only at progression. In pt-1, both the NLRC5 and β2M mutations acquired at disease progression were truncating, suggesting loss-of-function alterations. Copy number analysis reveals frequent whole-genome doubling and intensive copy number alterations in all tumors, including recurrent losses of chromosome 9p, 17p, and chromosome 13, indicating chromosomal instability as a driver of disease progression. Conclusion: Patients who progress on acalabrutinib have a poor outcome, and newer therapies are required for their treatment. In this small cohort, we observed non-BTK mutations associated with acalabrutinib resistance and disease progression. Disclosures Nastoupil: Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therappeutics: Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Juno: Honoraria. Neelapu:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fowler:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wang:Acerta Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; MoreHealth: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Juno: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document