Imatinib as Second-Line Therapy, Ameliorates or Maintains Molecular Responses Obtained with Ponatinib First-Line in Chronic Phase CML Patients

Abstract Background & aims The third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Ponatinib demonstrates extremely potent BCR-ABL inhibitory activity in CML patients in chronic or advanced phase, resistant to 1, 2 or 3 prior TKI (Cortes NEJM, 2013) and it seemed interesting to test this agent in the front-line setting of chronic phase patients. The EPIC trial was a phase III trial set up to compare the molecular outcomes of Imatinib 400 (IM400) versus Ponatinib 45 mg daily at one year. However, this trial has been abrogated at early stages by the FDA despite the impressive molecular efficacy of Ponatinib (Lipton, Lancet Oncol 2016) because of unexpected and unacceptable rates of arterial thrombotic events that occurred in another trial (PACE). A majority of patients in the Ponatinib arm were switched towards IM400, but their outcome is not known. The aim of this study was to analyse the general and molecular outcomes of such patients in our country. Methods This is an observational study following the rules and regulations of these studies in our country. Data were monitored and retrospectively collected in the 5 centers involved in the EPIC trial. Molecular analyses were performed locally during ponatinib exposure (in parallel with centralised assessments) and during IM treatment thereafter. Only local results, expressed in % BCR-ABL (IS), were used in this analysis, and all respective molecular biology laboratories have been involved in the Eutos/ELN BCR-ABL accreditation system. Results Thirteen patients were analysed, 9 males and 4 females, with a median age of 58.5 (range 19.5-69) years at chronic phase CML diagnosis. Sokal scores were low for 4, intermediate for 7, high for 2 patients, Euro score was low for 7, intermediate for 5 and high for 1, Eutos LTS score was low for 10, intermediate for 2 and high for 1. Patients were harbouring a "conventional" Philadelphia chromosome without clonal evolution (20-28 metaphases analysed/patient) at diagnosis. All patients were harbouring a Major BCR-ABL transcript. The median BCR-ABL transcript level was 109 (range 35-440) % at diagnosis. Blood pressure was normal in all patients at diagnosis except one. Ponatinib was initiated in all patients at 45 mg daily after a median of 1.5 (range 0.8-2.75) months after diagnosis. Median Ponatinib duration was 4 (range 0.5-6.3) months. Complete Hematologic Response was obtained in 0.98 (range 0.5-1) month in all patients. At 3 months, median BCR-ABL ratio was 0.19 (range 0.008-2.74) %, all patients being in early molecular response (EMR) and 4 patients being already in major molecular response (MMR). Median Ponatinib dose at cessation was 45 (range 0-45) mg daily. IM was started at 400 mg daily in all patients after a median of 1 (range 1-35) day after Ponatinib cessation and after a median of 4 (range 0.54-6.54) months after Ponatinib initiation. The median BCR-ABL transcripts at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 months of Ponatinib (i.e. after a median time of 7, 10, 16, 22, 28, 34, 40 and 46 months of IM) were 0.22 (range 0.01-27)%, 0.08 (0.005-8.99)%, 0.08 (0.01-2.01)%, 0.1 (0.003-1.9)%, 0.03 (0.001-1.61)%, 0.01 (<0.001-0.21)%, 0.01 (0.001-0.21) and 0.01 (0.001-0.02) respectively (see figure 1). On the 10 evaluable patients for molecular analyses, at Ponatinib cessation 40% of patients were >MMR, 40% of patients in MMR, 20% in MR4. At last follow-up, on IM400 10% of patients were in >MMR, 40% in MMR, 20% in MR4, 10% in MR4.5 and 20% in MR5, i. e. 50% in deep molecular response. At last follow-up, all patients were alive, still on IM400 daily for 32 (27.75-37.4) months, except 4 [1 grade 3 asthenia (now on Dasatinib), 2 molecular failure (now on Dasatinib and Bosutinib)], 1 free of treatment]. None of the patients progressed towards advanced phases to date. No thrombotic events occurred in any of the patients on Ponatinib. Three patients developed hypertension on Ponatinib requiring treatment, still ongoing at last follow-up in all. Conclusion The use of Imatinib after Ponatinib first-line therapy for chronic phase CML patients is safe. Despite a significant tyrosine kinase inhibition inferior activity in vitro, it allows the maintenance or the improvement of molecular responses throughout time and serves as a consolidation therapy. These data might pave the way for the design of future clinical trials using Ponatinib in the front-line setting in conjunction with Ponatinib dose reduction. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Ariad, BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Coiteux:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Speakers Bureau. Mouchel:Ariad/Incyte: Employment. Mahon:BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria. Etienne:novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Guerci:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ARIAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Outcome of Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Nilotinib Front-Line

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139921 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 44-45

Author(s):

Franck E Nicolini ◽

Vincent Alcazer ◽

Pascale Cony-Makhoul ◽

Stephanie Dulucq ◽

Sandrine Hayette ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Front Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Long Term Outcome

Nilotinib (NIL) 600 mg daily has demonstrated its superiority over Imatinib 400 mg daily in terms of response and incidence of deep molecular response in the front-line chronic phase (CP) CML setting. In this observational study we have retrospectively analyzed the outcome of in- and out-study 202 patients (pts) treated in this setting with NIL 600 mg front-line, in "real-life" conditions. All pts with newly diagnosed adult CP-CML receiving NIL 300 mg BID alone front-line between 10/2007 and 06/2020, were eligible for this study. Data were retrospectively collected according to the current French regulations with pts' information. All pts were assessed and followed according to ELN recommendations 2003, 2006, and 2009 along treatment and to the recommendations from the French group of CML (D. Rea et al., Cancer 2018) in case of TFR. In this regard, a TKI was resumed if loss of MMR. All BCR-ABL1 assessments were performed in the 3 reference laboratories, standardised and expressed in % (IS) with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. The primary endpoints were the rate of molecular responses in the long-term and the (vascular) safety of Nilotinib. Secondary endpoints were the kinetics of molecular response, survival and safety of Nilotinib. Survival (OS, PFS & EFS) was defined according to ELN (J. Guilhot et al. Blood 2012). Two hundred and two patients were reported with 44% females and 56% males with a median age at diagnosis of 50.4 (17.5-83) years, and 26% of them had cardiovascular risk factors at onset (tobacco abuse 11%, hypercholesterolemia 9.3%, diabetes 1.45%, none with past history of cardiovascular events [CVE]). ELTS scores were high in 14%, intermediate in 31% and low in 55% of pts. Twenty-four (12%) pts harboured additional chromosomal abnormalities at diagnosis. The median follow-up after NIL initiation was 61.5 (1-147.5) months. At last follow-up 113 pts (55%) are not on NIL anymore for toxicities, TFR or resistance reasons. Twenty-eight (14%) pts present an arterial event on NIL (18% PAOD, 14% angina pectoralis, 7% myocardial infarction, 14% stroke, 47% others such as atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy...), that occurred after a median of 26 (0.6-98.5) months on NIL. Forty-six (22.5%) pts reached TFR criteria and stopped NIL after a median of 58.5 (27-126) months. The cumulative incidence (CI) rates of MMR at 1, 2 and 5 years were 64 (57-71)%, 79.4 (75.45-83.35)% and 95 (92-98.5)% respectively. For MR4, those were 35.5 (29-42)%, 60 (52-67)% and 82 (74.5-89)% respectively; and for MR4.5, were 14 (9-19)%, 31 (24-28)% and 62 (54-70.5)% respectively. The CI of sustained MR4.5 (i. e. patients eligible for TFR: MR4.5 ≥2 years) was observed in 30 (23-37)% at 3 years, 45.5 (36-55)% at 5 years and 52.5 (41.5-64)% at 6 years (Figure). The CI of patients entering TFR was 16.75 (10.5-23)% at 5 years and 51.94 (37.31-66.57)% at 10 years with a survival without MMR loss of 70.7 (58- 86)% at 1 year and 65.26 (50.6-84)% at 5 years. Nine (4.5%) pts progressed towards accelerated phase (4 pts) or BC (2 lymphoid, 3 myeloid) responsible for 5 deaths at latest follow-up. Among NIL resistant patients screened, 15 were harbouring ABL1 mutations (5 Y253H, 3 E255K, 3 T315I, 1 M244V, 1 G250E, 1 F359V, 1 V299L). Overall, 10 patients died (5 from CML, 5 from unrelated causes). The probability of OS was 95.75 [95%CI: 92.9-98.7]% at 2 years and 94.8 [91.5-98.3]% at 5 years, for PFS it was 94.92 [91.7-98.2]% at 2 years and 89.5 [84.7-94.6]% at 5 years, and EFS it was 78 [72.3-84]% at 2 years and 60.25 [53.3-68.1]% at 5 years. Regarding sustained MR4.5, univariate analysis showed that female gender (HR=2.46 [1.50-4.02], p<0.001) and low ELTS (HR=0.41 [0.22-0.76], p<0.004) had a significant impact, while multivariate analysis confirmed the role of these 2 factors (HR=2.31 [1.41- 3.79], p=0.001 and HR= 0.52 [0.30- 0.90], p=0.02) in addition to high ELTS (HR= 0.28 [0.14- 0.58], p<0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that only age impacted on the CI of CVE (HR= 1.07 [1.04-1.10], p<0.001, and HR=1.07 [1.04-1.10], p<0.001). NIL first-line efficiently limits progression of newly diagnosed CP-CML patients and provides high rates of sustained MR4.5, allowing TFR in a substantial proportion of pts. However, the onset of arterial occlusive events, especially in the elderly is a matter of concern in the choice of this compound at treatment initiation. Disclosures Nicolini: Incyte: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma Ltd: Consultancy. Cony-Makhoul:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Dulucq:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Cayuela:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mahon:ARIAD: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Etienne:Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Pegylated Interferon-Alpha 2a in Combination with Nilotinib As First-Line Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (Nilopeg trial). Four-Year Follow-up Results

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1578.1578 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1578-1578 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Franck E. Nicolini ◽

Gabriel Etienne ◽

Viviane Dubruille ◽

Lydia Roy ◽

Françoise Huguet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Pegylated Interferon ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Molecular Responses ◽

Log Reduction

Abstract Background & aims In the Nilopeg trial (EudraCT 2010-019786-28), we have previously demonstrated that the combination of nilotinib (Tasigna® Novartis), a second generation inihibitor (TKI2), combined to pegylated interferon-alpha 2a (Peg-IFN, Pegasys®, Roche) in de novo chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients is able to induce high rates of molecular responses with an acceptable additional toxicity (F. E. Nicolini et al. Lancet Haematology 2015) within 24 months of follow-up. We report here the ≥4-year follow-up of such patients for toxicity and efficacy. Methods In a phase 2 study, newly diagnosed CP-CML patients were assigned to a priming strategy by Peg-IFN (± HU) for a month at 90 mg/wk, prior to a combination of nilotinib 300 mg BID + Peg-IFN 45 micro.g/wk for ≥ 1 year, maximum 2 years. After 2 years nilotinib was continued alone. The primary endpoint was the rate of confirmed molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) by 1 year. Molecular assessments were centralised for all patients and expressed as BCR-ABLIS in % for 2 years and then performed in each center [all expressed in % on the international scale (IS)]. All data presented here are in intention-to-treat. Events were defined as death, progression to AP or BC, failure on nilotinib or nilotinib treatment discontinuation for any cause excluding treatment-free remission (TFR). Results Fourty-two patients were enrolled in this trial (one withdrawn its consent prior to treatment initiation), and the median follow-up is now 50.7 (47.8-52.8) months. Sokal and Euro scores were high for 12% and 2%, intermediate for 49% and 55% and low for 39% and 43% of the patients respectively. The median age at treatment initiation was 53 (23-85) years, 2 patients had a masked Philadelphia chromosome, 3 a variant form, and 1 additional chromosomal abnormalities, all patients had "major" BCR-ABL1 transcripts. The rates of Complete Cytogenetic Responses (CCyR) at "6", and "12" months of combination (i. e. at 5 and 11 months of TKI2) were 71%, and 100% respectively. Eighty seven percent of patients had a BCR-ABLIS ≤10% at M3 (i. e. after 2 months TKI). The rates of molecular responses respectively at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months were 76%, 78%, 83%, 73% for MMR, 51%, 58.5%, 66%, 58.5% for 4 log reduction (MR4), 17%, 34%, 34%, 44% for 4.5 log reduction (MR4.5), 12%, 32%, 29%, 41.5% for ≥5 log reduction (MR5), shown as cumulative incidence curves for MR4.5 in figure 1. The median doses of Peg-IFN delivered to the patients during the first year were 45 (0-45) micro.g/wk, and for nilotinib 600 (300-600) mg daily. Interestingly, logistic regression analysis adjusted on MR4.5 responses showed a significant relationship with the mean doses of Peg-IFN delivered to the patients at 12 months (p=0.003, OR = 1.09 [1.03-1.16]), 24 months (p=0.005, OR = 1.08 [1.02-1.14]) and 48 months (p=0.024, OR = 1.09 [1.01-1.17], but not with the mean doses of nilotinib [p=0.84, OR = 0.99 [0.99-1.01], p=0.087, OR = 1 [0.99-1.01], and p=0.88, OR = 1 [0.99-1.01] respectively. Eight patients (19.5%) were in TFR for a median of 6.8 (0.5-9.5) months after 2-year consecutive MR4.5, and none lost MMR yet at last follow-up. One patient died of progression (unmutated myeloid blast crisis at M6, who relapsed after unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation). There was no additional grade 3-4 hematologic or biochemical toxicities occurring after 24 months. At last follow-up 10 patients switched for another TKI (2 for dasatinib, 5 for imatinib, and 3 for imatinib followed by dasatinib), for unsufficient cytogenetic or molecular response (2 patients) or for toxicity (7 patients). Overall, 4 patients presented some cardio-vascular events 3 coronary stenoses, one brain stroke). Conclusion Despite additional initial toxicities Peg-IFN priming strategy, followed by the combination of nilotinib and Peg-IFN during the first year induces very high rates of durable deep molecular responses (MR4 and MR4.5) at later time-points, offering TFR for number of patients. To date, no emerging severe adverse events occurred. However, to confirm these promising results, a randomised phase III study testing nilotinib versus nilotinib + Peg-IFN is absolutely warranted and in progress. Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of MR4.5 Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of MR4.5 Disclosures Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Etienne:ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Congress Travel/Accomodations, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Roy:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Huguet:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Legros:ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Giraudier:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Coiteux:BMS: Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Guerci-Bresler:ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Amé:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Cony-Makhoul:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gardembas:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Hermet:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Rousselot:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Mahon:ARIAD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

The Outcome of Treatment-Free Remission after First-Line Nilotinib or Dasatinib in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Is Different

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146722 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2552-2552

Author(s):

Franck E. Nicolini ◽

Vincent Alcazer ◽

Stephanie Dulucq ◽

Sandrine Hayette ◽

Jean-Michel Cayuela ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Median Dose ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

French Group ◽

Treatment Free Remission ◽

The Impact

Abstract Aims: The absolute number of chronic phase CML patients (pts) reaching the treatment-free remission (TFR) criteria has been substantially increased by the use of second-generation TKI (TKI2), initiated since diagnosis, comparing to Imatinib first-line. However, the relative rate of unsuccessful TFR (i. e. pts loosing their MMR after TKI2 cessation) still remains around 50% at 2 years and beyond, whatever the TKI2 was. The aim of this study is to analyse the rate of successful TFR in pts receiving Nilotinib (Nilo) or Dasatinib (Dasa) first-line obtaining the appropriate criteria. Methods: Observational retrospective study in 3 reference centers of the French group of CML lead between 2010 and 2021. Eligible pts were CP CML pts initiating either Nilo 300 mg BID or Dasa 100 mg daily since diagnosis, until cessation for sustained MR4.5 (i.e. ≥2 years on ≥4 datapoints). Data were retrospectively collected according to the national regulations with pts' information. All pts were assessed and followed according to ELN recommendations 2009, 2013 and 2020 along treatment and to the recommendations from the French group of CML (D. Rea et al., Cancer 2018) for TFR. In this regard, the TKI2 was resumed in case of loss of MMR. All BCR-ABL1 assessments were performed in the 3 reference laboratories, standardised and expressed in % (IS) with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. All patients were harbouring major BCR-ABL1 transcripts. The primary endpoint was the survival without loss of MMR after TKI2 cessation. The secondary endpoints were the kinetics of MMR loss, and the identification of factors influencing MMR loss. Results: Seventy-two pts were reported (47 Nilo, 25 Dasa) with 57% females with a median age at diagnosis of 48 (36.75-61.25) years. The median follow-up since diagnosis was 9.26 (3.75-13.75) years (8.8 for Nilo and 9.47 for Dasa p=ns) and after TKI2 cessation 3.94 (0.7-8.8) years (3.92 for Nilo and 3.90 for Dasa p=ns). Sokal scores were 42% Low, 41% Intermediate, 17% High in Nilo and 39% L, 25% I and 35% H in Dasa pts (p=ns). ELTS scores were 50% L, 22% I, 9.5% H (18.5% Uk) in Nilo and 46.5% L, 28.5% I and 3.5% H (21.5% Uk) in Dasa pts (p=0.95). Five (9%) pts harboured ACA at diagnosis in the Nilo group and 2 (7%) in the Dasa group (p=1.00). The median time from TKI2 initiation to sustained MR4.5 was 19 (3.12-36) months in the Nilo group and 16 (6.3-39) months in the Dasa group (p=0.644). The duration of sustained MR4.5 until cessation was 3.04 (1.5-9.3) years for Nilo and 2.65 (1.11-7.95) for Dasa (p=0.96). The median dosing of Nilo was 600 (300-800) mg daily and 80 (20-100) mg at TKI2 cessation. None of these patients switched to another TKI during the follow-up. TKI2 cessation occurred after 60.5 (43-74.5) months in the Nilo group and 68 (39-90) months in the Dasa group (p=0.581). Thirty-seven pts out of 47 (79%) were BCR-ABL1 undetectable at Nilo cessation 18/25 (72%) at Dasa cessation (p=0.60). At M3 after discontinuation, 58% of pts remained undetectable after Nilo cessation and 30.4% after Dasa cessation (p=0.05).The median survival of pts without loss of MMR was not reached in the Nilo group, and was 14 (4.73-NR) months in the Dasa group, (p=0.042) as analysed by the KM method (Figure 1.). Two patients died (1 Nilo, 1 Dasa) from competing events (solid tumours) after unsuccessful TFR. Twenty-eight pts (14 Dasa, 14 Nilo) restarted their TKI2 after MMR loss and all regained ≥ MMR after 3 months of Dasa at a median dose of 75 (40-100) mg daily and all except one (who regained MMR at M12) after resumption of Nilo at a median dose of 350 (300-600) mg daily. Univariate analysis identified pts with H+I Sokal (as compared to low) as an unfavourable factor for successful TKI2 cessation [HR=0.35 (0.15-0.83), p=0.017] and type of TKI2 (Nilo as reference vs Dasa) was discriminant [HR=2.1 (1.01-4.35), p=0.047]. Multivariate analysis identified the type of TKI2 as a significant factor impacting on TFR outcome [HR 2.11 (0.97-4.55], p=0.05]. Conclusions: As it is likely that no prospective head-to-head comparison will be performed in this setting, on this limited series of pts, we conclude that the outcome of TFR seems to be different according to the TKI2 used since diagnosis, suggesting the impact of distinct biological variables modified by the type of TKI2 on the long run (such as immunological system, BM micro-environment, others) on TFR outcome. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; Kartos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sun Pharma Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Etienne: Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rea: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Patient Profile and Treatment Patterns in a Commercially Insured Population with Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127237 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5880-5880

Author(s):

Nathan H Fowler ◽

Yanni Hao ◽

Stephen Lim ◽

Guifang Chen ◽

Frank Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Third Line ◽

Line Of Therapy

Introduction: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the Western hemisphere. Patient characteristics and burden of FL are incomplete and vary from previous studies. This study evaluated patient profile, including patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and duration using real-world data. Methods: Using the Truven MarketScan® databases, patients with FL who were newly initiated with FL indicated regimens were identified from 1/1/2010-12/31/2013 (initial treatment identification period). Patients were selected if they were ≥18 years old, had 1 FL ICD-9 code (202.0) as primary or secondary diagnosis, at least 1 FL commonly prescribed systemic anti-cancer therapy after the diagnosis, and did not use any FL indicated regimen in the past 6 months prior to first agent included in the initial treatment identification period. These patents were followed ≥3 months or to June 30, 2018. Primary outcomes were the distribution of regimens by line, the number of patients who switched from first- to second-line therapies, and from second- to third-line therapies. The treatment duration by line of therapy and regimen were also analyzed. Discontinuation was defined as 3 months without receiving a regimen after treatment. Results: This study identified 4,970 patients who initiated treatment for FL. Of these patients, 48.1% were female (n=2,390), with a mean age of 62.0 (SD: 14.0) years. The average follow-up time was approximately 2 years (median: 733 days). In this analysis, 4,970 patients with FL received first-line therapy for 153 days (median: 94 days), 1,985 received second-line therapy (39.9% of patients who received first-line therapy) for 208 days (median: 80 days), and 664 received third-line therapy (13.4% of patients who received first-line therapy) for 117 days (median: 43 days). Of the 4,970 patients on first-line therapy, 453 (9.1%) remained on first-line therapy, 2,532 (51.0%) discontinued treatment, and 1,985 (39.9%) patients switched to the next line of therapy during the follow-up period. Of the 1,985 patients who switched to second-line therapy, 328 (16.5%) remained by the end of follow-up period, 993 (50.0%) discontinued, and 664 (33.4%) switched to the next line of therapy during the follow-up period. Of the 664 patients who switched to third-line therapy, 125 (18.8%) remained, 269 (40.5%) discontinued, and 270 (40.7%) switched to the next line of therapy. The most common first-line regimens in descending order received by patients were rituximab (n=1,478, 29.7%), R-CHOP (n=1,368, 27.5%), BR (n=1,050, 21.1%), R-CVP (n=371, 7.5%), and FCR (n=63, 1.3%). Second-line treatment regimens were (N=1,985) rituximab (n=992, 50.0%), BR (n=202, 10.2%), R-CHOP (n=138, 7.0%), and R-CVP (n=120, 6.1%). Third-line treatment regimens were (N=664) rituximab (n=228, 34.3%), BR (n=91, 13.7%), R-CHOP (n=75, 11.3%), cyclophosphamide (n=35, 5.3%) and R-CVP (n=31, 4.7%). Conclusion: This data set describes the percentage of patients that transition from first- to second-line and second- to third-line treatment for FL. The primary regimens used across the treatment lines conform to those recommended by the NCCN guidelines. In addition, smaller numbers of non-recommended regimens were reported. Disclosures Fowler: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hao:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lim:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Chen:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Employment. Li:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Arcona:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment.

Download Full-text

Second Line Therapy with Second Generation TKI After Intolerance to Imatinib Based Treatments Showed High Overall Survival in Contrast to Second Line Therapy After Resistance; Results of the Randomized CML Study IV

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.781.781 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 781-781

Author(s):

Susanne Saussele ◽

Michael Lauseker ◽

Ulrike Proetel ◽

Martin C. Müller ◽

Benjamin Hanfstein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Second Generation ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Imatinib Therapy ◽

Second Line ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Line Therapy

Abstract Abstract 781FN2 Introduction: Data on second line therapy with second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in CML treatment were generated mainly from phase II/III industry initiated trials (Review Hehlmann Exp Op. 2011). 24-month overall survival (OS) varies between 88% and 94% after intolerance and/or resistance to imatinib for chronic phase (CP) and between 67% and 72% for accelerated phase (AP) or blast crisis (BC). Intention to treat analyses including outcome of patients after discontinuation of first line therapies have not been available as yet. We thought to evaluate overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS) of imatinib intolerant vs. resistant patients under second line TKI with long-term follow-up within an investigator initiated trial. Methods: We analyzed data of the German CML study IV, a randomized 5-arm trial to optimize imatinib therapy on an intention to treat basis. According to protocol, follow-up of patients on and after second generation TKI after imatinib intolerance and/or resistance was continued for OS and PFS. Analysis of PFS was only relevant, if intolerance and resistance to imatinib therapy occurred while a patient was still in chronic phase (CP). Patients were censored at the time of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Results: From July 2002 to December 2010, 1,502 patients with Philadelphia chromosome and /or BCR-ABL positive CML in CP were randomized. 129 patients of the “imatinib after interferon arm” and 36 other patients had to be excluded (14 due to incorrect randomization or withdrawal of consent, 22 with missing baseline information). 1337 were randomized to primary imatinib treatment (imatinib 400 mg vs. imatinib 800 mg vs. imatinib in combination with either interferon alpha or araC). Of these, 234 (17%) discontinued imatinib therapy. 156 patients were treated with 2nd generation TKI, 61 were directly referred to allo-SCT, 17 patients received other regimens (including interferon alpha only or hydroxyurea). 120 of 156 patients started second generation TKI therapy (nilotinib, n=41, dasatinib, n=75, bosutinib, n=2, nilotinib and dasatinib, n=2) within 3 months after stopping imatinib, received treatment for at least one week and were evaluable for PFS and OS. 36 patients received second TKI later (median 10 months, range 3.5–61.4). Median age was 50 years (range 16–78), 42.5% were female. 48 patients were intolerant, 48 failed imatinib within CP and 24 after loss of CP (accelerated phase, n=10, blast crisis, n=14). Median time to second generation TKI was 17 months (range 1.4–97 months) and median follow-up after start of second-line TKI 31 months (range 0.2–71 months). Risk stratification according to the EUTOS Score was high in 20 patients (17%) and low in 94 patients (78%) and unknown in 6 patients (5%). OS for all 120 patients 3 years after start of second generation TKI was 73%, 96% for intolerant and 80% for resistant patients in CP and 19% for resistant patients in advanced disease (s. Fig. 1). According to EUTOS score, 3-year OS was 78% for low and 56% for high risk patients. Probability of PFS of the 96 patients in 1st CP after 3 years was 96% for intolerant and 76% for resistant patients. After 2nd generation TKI, 18 patients received an allo-SCT: all were in CP, 2 patients after imatinib intolerance, 16 patients after imatinib resistance. Conclusion: Survival on second generation TKI is high for imatinib intolerant patients in first CP but much lower for resistant patients in first CP or for patients with advanced disease phases. Alternative treatment strategies are warranted for these patient groups. Disclosures: Krause: Micromet: Research Funding. Kneba:Hoffmann La Roche: Honoraria. Hochhaus:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. German CML Study Group:Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMBF: Research Funding; EU: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Idelalisib Plus Anti-CD20 Used Second Line Shows Improved PFS and Comparable Safety Compared to Later Line Therapy of Relapsed CLL

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-110853 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 5564-5564

Author(s):

Jennifer R. Brown ◽

Rebecca J Chan ◽

Wei Ye ◽

Guan Xing ◽

Caroline Roudet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Research Funding ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Anti Cd20 ◽

Line Setting

Abstract Introduction: Idelalisib (IDELA) is a first-in-class PI3Kδ inhibitor that is approved for use in combination with rituximab for patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphoid leukemia (R/R CLL) in the United States and in combination with rituximab or ofatumumab for the same indication in the European Union. Clinical trials evaluating IDELA in the first line setting for CLL were prematurely terminated due to an increased incidence of serious adverse events (AEs) and mortality; therefore, IDELA is not indicated as a first line therapy for CLL. The safety signal observed in the treatment naïve setting has produced a prevailing view that early line use of IDELA may also lead to inferior clinical outcomes. To address this question, we evaluated the clinical benefit:risk balance for IDELA in early vs. later lines of use in the relapsed setting. Objective: To investigate clinical outcomes across sub-populations of IDELA + anti-CD20-treated patients with R/R CLL based on number of prior chemo-immunotherapy treatment regimens. Methods: Using clinical outcomes data collected in Gilead-sponsored clinical trials of patients with R/R CLL treated with IDELA + anti-CD20 (312-0116/0117, N=110, Furman et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 2014; 370:997-1007, and 312-0119, N=173, Jones et al., Lancet Haematol. 2017; 4:e114-e126), we retrospectively compared the overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and AE profile for patients previously treated with 1 prior regimen (IDELA given in the second line setting, 2L), 2 prior regimens (3L), or ≥3 prior regimens (≥4L). PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and groups were compared using a log-rank test. The incidence of AEs was compared using the Kruskal Wallis test. Results: Among 283 patients treated with IDELA + anti-CD20, 49 (17.3%) received IDELA 2L, 69 (24.4%) received it 3L, and 165 (58.3%) received it ≥4L. Patient characteristics were similar except that patients in the ≥4L group presented with Rai stage III/IV disease more frequently compared to the 2L and 3L groups (70.3% vs. 61.3% and 57.9%, respectively, Table 1). ORR was similar irrespective of the number of prior regimens (85.7% for the 2L group, 73.9% for the 3L group, and 80% for the ≥4L group, p=0.2866); however, PFS and OS were longer in the 2L group compared to the 3L and ≥4L groups (median PFS= 31.5 months, 16.6 months, and 17.3 months, respectively, [Figure 1] and median OS=47.4 months, not reached (NR), and 34.6 months, respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed across treatment setting groups in the incidence of grade 3/4 key treatment-emergent AEs, including cough, diarrhea, infection, transaminitis, and colitis (Figure 2). Conclusion: These analyses indicate that patients with R/R CLL experience comparable or improved efficacy and have a similar safety profile when IDELA + anti-CD20 regimens are used 2nd line as compared to later line, after chemo-immunotherapeutic regimens. The longer PFS and OS times for patients treated with IDELA in the 2L may reflect shorter time since diagnosis, lower stage disease, or less disease resistance in this group, but also suggest that the efficacy benefit of IDELA + anti-CD20 is greater and may therefore better offset the potential toxicity in this patient sub-group. These findings support the use of IDELA + anti-CD20 in the 2L+ setting for patients with R/R CLL following chemo-immunotherapy. Disclosures Brown: Abbvie: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Boehringer: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Loxo: Consultancy; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries: Research Funding; Invectys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Acerta / Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy. Ye:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Xing:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Roudet:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Ruzicka:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. O'Brien:TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Aptose Biosciences Inc.: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Vaniam Group LLC: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Second Treatment Free Remission after Combination Therapy with Ruxolitinib Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147954 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2555-2555

Author(s):

Kendra Sweet ◽

Ehab L. Atallah ◽

Jerry P. Radich ◽

Mei-Jie Zhang ◽

Eva Sahakian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment Free Remission ◽

One Year

Abstract Background: Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is feasible in a subset of CML patients who have maintained a deep molecular response for at least two years. Numerous discontinuation trials have been performed and consistently show approximately 50% of patients relapse after stopping TKIs. A recent study examining rates of treatment free remission (TFR) after a second attempt at stopping TKIs found, with a median follow up time of 38.3 months, 64.3% of patients had a molecular relapse (defined as a loss of major molecular response (MMR)). At 12, 24 and 36 months, TFR rates were 48%, 42% and 35%, respectively. These data suggest some patients with a history of molecular relapse upon TKI cessation could successfully stop treatment on a subsequent attempt, yet the majority will relapse a second time. 'Complete eradication' of CML remains elusive in most patients likely as a result of minimal residual disease (MRD), which is the result of BCR-ABL independent drug resistance. More specifically, CML cells that reside in sanctuary sites such as the bone marrow adhere to fibronectin and demonstrate cell adhesion mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR). The bone marrow microenvironment contains many cytokines and growth factors capable of inducing STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation via the JAK-STAT pathway leading to protection against TKI-induced cell death. Inhibiting JAK2 and TYK2 leads to complete inhibition of pSTAT3-Y705, thereby implicating the role of activation of JAK2 and TYK2 in STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation and resistance towards BCR-ABL TKI-induced cell death. A phase I clinical trial combined ruxolitinib, which inhibits JAK2 and TYK2, plus nilotinib in chronic phase (CP) CML patients and found that ruxolitinib 15mg PO BID was safe and well tolerated with 4/10 patients achieving undetectable BCR-ABL1 transcripts by PCR. Study Design and Methods: This single arm phase II study (NCT03610971) will enroll 41 subjects from the H Jean Khoury Cure CML Consortium. Eligible subjects must have a confirmed diagnosis of CP-CML and have previously attempted to discontinue TKI therapy per NCCN guidelines and had molecular recurrence, defined as loss of MMR, and were restarted on TKI. This trial combines ruxolitinib 15mg BID plus BCR-ABL TKI (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib or bosutinib) for 12 28-day cycles in the combination treatment phase (CTP). RQ-PCR to measure BCR-ABL transcripts will be checked at screening and every three months during the CTP. In the event that a subject experiences intolerance to a TKI, has confirmed loss of MMR, or loss of MR4.5 (>0.0032% IS) on two central PCR results, or discontinues ruxolitinib, the subject will be removed from CTP and enter into long term follow-up (LTFU). CTP phase will be followed by further RQ-PCR screening for the concurrent TFR phase. At this time ruxolitinib will be discontinued and any subject who has met the criteria for the TFR phase will be enrolled. During the TFR phase, subjects will discontinue their TKI and be monitored off treatment with RQ-PCR checked monthly for the first year, every six weeks for year two, and every 12 weeks during year three. Upon molecular recurrence, defined as loss of MMR, TKIs will be restarted. The primary endpoint is the 12-month TFR rate subsequent to completion of 12 cycles of combination therapy; however, subjects will remain in the TFR phase for three years. Therefore, the total duration of the trial will be approximately five years (one year on CTP + three years in the TFR phase + one-year LTFU). Study statistical design was calculated to yield a one-sided type I error rate of 0.025 and power of 65% when the true one-year relapse rate is 35%. This study will additionally assess patient-reported outcomes in conjunction with RQ-PCR testing. PROMIS and other measures will be self-administered through REDCap. Correlative studies will include comparing changes in pSTAT3 in K562 and KU812 cell lines using plasma from CML patients being treated with TKIs plus ruxolitinib, using the plasma inhibitory assay technique. Changes in pSTAT3 and pSTAT5 will be correlated with clinical response and rate of TFR. Additional correlatives include multiparameter flow-based assessment of the T-cell compartment (activity/polarization) as well as natural killer cell fractions in CML patients at various time points (TKIs alone, TKIs plus ruxolitinib and during TFR). Thus far, 14 patients have been enrolled. Disclosures Sweet: Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Atallah: Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Radich: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thompson: Novartis/ Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Mauro: Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharma / SPARC: Research Funding. Pinilla Ibarz: AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, TG Therapeutics, Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Advisory; Sellas: Other: ), patents/royalties/other intellectual property; MEI, Sunesis: Research Funding; AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Takeda: Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Ruxolitinib is being used off-label in chronic myeloid leukemia

Download Full-text

Selective Escalation of Imatinib Therapy and Early Switching to Nilotinib In De Novo Chronic Phase CML Patients: Interim Results From the TIDEL-II Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.209.209 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 209-209 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

David T. Yeung ◽

Michael Osborn ◽

Deborah L. White ◽

Susan Branford ◽

Lauren Haswell ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

De Novo ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment Targets ◽

T315i Mutation

Abstract Abstract 209 Background: Although the majority of chronic phase (CP) Philadelphia positive (Ph+) chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients (pts) achieve good disease control with imatinib, some pts demonstrate suboptimal responses. Early dose escalation or switching to nilotinib, a more potent BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor, as soon as suboptimal molecular response is recognised may improve response and disease outcome. Aim: To optimise clinical and molecular outcomes in Ph+ CML using imatinib (IM) as frontline therapy with selective IM dose escalation based on pharmacokinetic (PK) results and switching to nilotinib (NIL) in case of suboptimal response, or IM-intolerance. Method: TIDEL-II is a multicentre, single arm prospective ALLG trial in de novo CP-CML pts with 2 separate sequential cohorts. In Cohort I, pts are treated with IM 600mg/d up-front, aiming for BCR-ABL RQ-PCR target values of ≤ 10%, 1%, and 0.1% IS (major molecular response, MMR) at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively. Pts who do not reach these treatment targets are classified as suboptimal responders. Dose escalation to 800mg/d or maximal tolerated dose occurs if trough IM level is <1000ng/mL at day 22, or for suboptimal response. A switch to NIL (400mg bid) is triggered if molecular targets are still not met 3 months after IM escalation, or for loss or response, or for IM intolerance (Grade III/IV or persistent Grade II non-haematological toxicity). Results: 105 pts were assessed with median follow up of 18.9 months (range: 9–33) in cohort I. For pts with a minimum of 12 months follow up (n=80), complete cytogenetic response (CCR), MMR and complete molecular response (CMR)# rates at 12 months were 92%, 66% and 11% respectively. BCR-ABL levels at 3 months were predictive of MMR at 12 months, but not for CMR due to small pt numbers (Table 1). For pts who failed to achieve BCR-ABL of ≤10% at 3 months, the 12 month MMR rate was 25% (vs 5% in TIDEL-I where pts were also started on IM 600mg/d and suboptimal responders were dose escalated to IM 800mg/d). Of the 105 pts, 16 pts dose escalated IM due to a day 22 IM blood level <1000ng/mL, after which 2/16 switched to NIL (1 suboptimal, 1 intolerant); all achieved CCR. Twelve pts dose escalated for suboptimal response, 7 subsequently switched to NIL for again failing treatment targets. In all, 21/105 pts (20%) switched to NIL: 7 for suboptimal response and 14 for intolerance. The median time to switching and the median pre-switch prescribed IM dose were 468 days & 800mg/d for the suboptimal group; and 183 days & 600mg/d for the intolerant group respectively. Of these, 20/21 achieved or remained in CCR. At the time of switching to NIL, 19/21 pts were not in MMR. With a median follow-up of 295 days post switch to NIL, 9/12 intolerant pts (75%) achieved MMR, whereas 1/7 suboptimal IM responders (14%) achieved MMR (median follow up after switching: 286 days). Only 7/105 pts (7%) discontinued treatment: 4 for non-compliance, 1 pt with a T315I mutation and 2 pts with blast crisis (BC). Progression to BC was associated with detectable mutations: 1 pt with 4 different mutations including T315I and 1 pt with H396P mutation. The progression rate to AP/BC was 2%. The overall mutation rate was 5/105 (5%). The 2 pts who progressed and the pt who discontinued when a T315I mutation was detected were among the 28 pts with BCR-ABL values >1.0% at 3 months. In contrast, no resistant mutations were detected or transformations occurred in the 49 pts with BCR-ABL values ≤1.0% at 3 months. Conclusion: A strategy of selective intensification of BCR-ABL inhibitor therapy based on molecular response and PK values resulted in a 66% MMR rate by 12 months. Despite a minority of pts (20%) requiring a switch to NIL, this has enhanced the rate of MMR by 12 months when compared to IM intensification alone as seen in TIDEL-I where the rate of MMR and CMR by 12 months was 47% and 9% respectively. The IM intolerant pts demonstrated excellent response rates after switching to NIL. To date, the results from TIDEL-II compare favourably with other frontline strategies with regards to response and transformation rates. Disclosures: Yeung: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Osborn:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. White:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Branford:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Slader:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ross:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mills:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hughes:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Following Initial Relapse in Patients with Relapsed Systemic Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3338.3338 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3338-3338

Author(s):

Nidhi Tandon ◽

Surbhi Sidana ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL Amyloidosis) is a plasma cell disorder characterized by deposition of misfolded insoluble protein fibrils (composed of monoclonal κ or λ light chains) in tissues causing progressive organ dysfunction. Chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), when eligible, are standard treatment options but relapses remain inevitable for most patients. However, there is a paucity of literature describing relapsed or refractory patients. We performed a retrospective study to analyze the outcomes upon relapse and the impact of type of therapy and retreatment with the same therapy at relapse. Methods Clinical and laboratory data of 1327 consecutive patients with systemic AL amyloidosis seen at Mayo Clinic within 90 days of their diagnosis, between 2006 and 2015, was collected by chart review and analyzed retrospectively. Of these patients, 219 (16.5%) were lost to follow-up. Among the remaining 1108 patients, 366 patients experienced a documented hematological or organ relapse or progression requiring change of first line or start of second line therapy and form the current study population. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from start of second line treatment or progression mandating therapy until death from any cause or the date of last follow up. The OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test was used to estimate the difference in survival curves. Results The median age was 62.8 years (36.1 - 85.3); 63.1% were males; 64.7% / 59.3% / 11.4% had cardiac / renal / hepatic involvement and 24.2% / 32.1% / 23.3% / 20.3% had MS I/II/III/IV. The median estimated follow up for this cohort was 69.4 months (95% CI; 64.4, 76.8) from the start of first line therapy and 45.2 months (95% CI; 36.5, 50.6) from the start of second line therapy or progression requiring treatment. The median time to second line treatment or relapse /progression mandating therapy was 16.2 months (1-93) from the start of first line therapy. At relapse, 14 patients underwent ASCT, 165 were treated with proteasome inhibitor (PI) based therapy, 83 with immunomodulator (IMiD) based therapy, 33 with alkylator based therapy, 15 with a combination of PI and IMiD, 10 with steroids, 8 with other therapies and 38 did not receive treatment. Among the 366 patients, 124 (33.9%) required change or reinstitution of therapy during follow up at the time of analysis. The median time to third line treatment or relapse /progression mandating therapy was 31 months (95% CI; 24, 40.5) from the start of second line treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 76.4 months (95% CI; 65.2, 83.6) from the start of first line therapy and 38.8 months (95% CI; 29.6, 52.6) from the start of second line therapy. The type of therapy at relapse (ASCT vs PI vs IMiD vs melphalan vs steroids and others) did not alter the time to next therapy (ASCT, 43.1m; PI, 31m; IMiD, 37m; melphalan, 20.8m; steroids and others, 20m; p=0.3) and OS (ASCT, 66.9m; PI, 51.1m; IMiD, 51.3m; melphalan, 37.2m; steroids and others, 80.7m; p=0.9) from the start of the second line treatment; as depicted in Figure 1. Retreatment with a different drug class (as the first line treatment) at relapse significantly reduced the time to next treatment (32.3m vs 22 m; p= 0.01) as compared to same therapy; but did not have any impact on survival (30.8m vs 51.1m; p = 0.5); as presented in Figure 2. Conclusion This study provides novel information about outcomes of patients with systemic AL amyloidosis who relapse or progress after first line therapy which could be useful in planning salvage therapies and designing clinical trials. Retreatment with a different therapy at relapse improves time to next therapy but does not impact OS. Hence, we conclude that the patients can fare well post relapse/ progression and can benefit from various treatment regimens including retreatment with the same agent. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen: Research Funding; pfizer: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kapoor:Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:BMS: Consultancy; Kesios: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Updated 18-Month Results from Dasfree: A Study Evaluating Dasatinib Discontinuation in Patients (Pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and Deep Molecular Response (DMR)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-116563 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4253-4253 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Neil P. Shah ◽

Jose Valentín García Gutiérrez ◽

Antonio Jiménez-Velasco ◽

Sarah Larson ◽

Susanne Saussele ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Safety Data ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Relapse Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) discontinuation is being investigated in pts with CML-CP with sustained DMR (defined here as MR4.5 or BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.0032% on the International Scale [IS]), with the goal of treatment-free remission (TFR). Successful TFR has been reported previously for pts enrolled in DASFREE (CA180-406/NCT01850004), which showed that 48% of CML-CP pts with DMR for ≥ 1 year were able to stop dasatinib and maintain major molecular response (MMR) 12 months after discontinuation. Here we present updated results from pts followed for a minimum of 18 months, in order to understand the durability of TFR beyond 12 months. Methods: DASFREE is a phase 2, open-label, single-arm study in adult pts with CML-CP on dasatinib for ≥ 2 years as 1st-line or subsequent therapy. Eligible pts had dasatinib-induced DMR (MR4.5) confirmed at a local lab for ≥ 1 year prior to enrollment, with a 1-log reduction in BCR-ABL1 from baseline within 3-6.5 months of starting dasatinib. MR4.5 was confirmed at a central lab twice within 3 months prior to dasatinib discontinuation (screening phase). BCR-ABL1 was monitored centrally after discontinuation every month in the 1st year, then every 3 months. Pts resumed dasatinib at their previous dose if MMR was lost. The primary endpoint is the rate of MMR 12 months after dasatinib discontinuation. Secondary endpoints include BCR-ABL1 kinetics, molecular relapse-free survival (MRFS; no loss of MMR), relapse-free survival (RFS; no loss of MMR, complete cytogenetic response, or complete hematologic response, or progression to accelerated/blast phase [AP/BP] CML), rate of transformation to AP/BP, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory analyses include frequency of adverse events (AEs) after discontinuation and during dasatinib treatment, and MMR after reinitiating dasatinib. Results: In total, 84 pts enrolled between February 2014 and June 2016 discontinued dasatinib; all had ≥ 18 months of follow-up after discontinuation at the time of this analysis. Pt characteristics were previously reported (the majority [64%] had low Sokal scores; no pt had prior interferon; 37 pts were on 1st-line dasatinib, 47 on subsequent lines of dasatinib). At 18 months after discontinuation, the RFS rate was 48% (95% CI 37-58) in all pts (Figure), 54% (95% CI 38, 70) in 1st-line pts, and 42% (95% CI 28, 57) in pts who received subsequent-line therapy. With longer follow-up, 1 additional pt lost MMR at 18 months following discontinuation. Of the 45 pts who lost MMR and restarted treatment, 44 regained MMR (1 pt discontinued after only 1 molecular assessment) in a median of 2 months (range 1-4) and 42 regained MR4.5 in a median of 3 months (range 2-18). Analyses of baseline pt characteristics revealed that for the 40 pts who did not lose MMR after discontinuation, 15 (37.5%) were able to maintain MR4.5. Additionally, the median time in prior MR4.5 was 28 months (range 13-116) for all pts, and was similar for 1st-line pts who maintained (27 months [range 13-56]) or lost MMR (27 months [range 15-68]) at 12 months. With longer follow-up, AEs (any cause) identified were consistent with previous reports and were found to be similar on and off treatment: 8 (10%) pts off treatment and 8 (18%) pts on treatment experienced grade 3/4 AEs of any cause after restarting dasatinib (4.4% were drug related). No transformation events or deaths occurred. Of the 13 reported withdrawal events occurring in 8 (9.5%) pts, 10 were resolved (5 off treatment, 5 resolved after restarting treatment due to loss of MMR) after a median of 5 months (range 1-12) after onset. One pt discontinued after restarting dasatinib due to malignancy unrelated to treatment. In addition to efficacy and safety data, multivariate analyses evaluating prognostic factors for MMR will be presented. Conclusions: Additional follow-up of pts enrolled in DASFREE revealed that TFR remained durable at 18 months after discontinuing dasatinib. AEs reported here were consistent with the known safety profile of dasatinib, and withdrawal was well tolerated. Collectively, this trial, the largest dasatinib discontinuation trial to date, continues to support the feasibility and practicality of TFR in pts with CML-CP in DMR treated with dasatinib in the 1st line and beyond. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Shah: ARIAD: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. García Gutiérrez:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Larson:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Saussele:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Rea:Incyte: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria. Mahon:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Levy:Takeda (Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.): Consultancy. Gómez-Casares:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Pane:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy. Nicolini:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mauro:Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sy:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Martin Regueira:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lipton:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text