Pegylated Interferon-Alpha 2a in Combination with Nilotinib As First-Line Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (Nilopeg trial). Four-Year Follow-up Results

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1578-1578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck E. Nicolini ◽  
Gabriel Etienne ◽  
Viviane Dubruille ◽  
Lydia Roy ◽  
Françoise Huguet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Pegylated Interferon ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
Log Reduction

Abstract Background & aims In the Nilopeg trial (EudraCT 2010-019786-28), we have previously demonstrated that the combination of nilotinib (Tasigna® Novartis), a second generation inihibitor (TKI2), combined to pegylated interferon-alpha 2a (Peg-IFN, Pegasys®, Roche) in de novo chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients is able to induce high rates of molecular responses with an acceptable additional toxicity (F. E. Nicolini et al. Lancet Haematology 2015) within 24 months of follow-up. We report here the ≥4-year follow-up of such patients for toxicity and efficacy. Methods In a phase 2 study, newly diagnosed CP-CML patients were assigned to a priming strategy by Peg-IFN (± HU) for a month at 90 mg/wk, prior to a combination of nilotinib 300 mg BID + Peg-IFN 45 micro.g/wk for ≥ 1 year, maximum 2 years. After 2 years nilotinib was continued alone. The primary endpoint was the rate of confirmed molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) by 1 year. Molecular assessments were centralised for all patients and expressed as BCR-ABLIS in % for 2 years and then performed in each center [all expressed in % on the international scale (IS)]. All data presented here are in intention-to-treat. Events were defined as death, progression to AP or BC, failure on nilotinib or nilotinib treatment discontinuation for any cause excluding treatment-free remission (TFR). Results Fourty-two patients were enrolled in this trial (one withdrawn its consent prior to treatment initiation), and the median follow-up is now 50.7 (47.8-52.8) months. Sokal and Euro scores were high for 12% and 2%, intermediate for 49% and 55% and low for 39% and 43% of the patients respectively. The median age at treatment initiation was 53 (23-85) years, 2 patients had a masked Philadelphia chromosome, 3 a variant form, and 1 additional chromosomal abnormalities, all patients had "major" BCR-ABL1 transcripts. The rates of Complete Cytogenetic Responses (CCyR) at "6", and "12" months of combination (i. e. at 5 and 11 months of TKI2) were 71%, and 100% respectively. Eighty seven percent of patients had a BCR-ABLIS ≤10% at M3 (i. e. after 2 months TKI). The rates of molecular responses respectively at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months were 76%, 78%, 83%, 73% for MMR, 51%, 58.5%, 66%, 58.5% for 4 log reduction (MR4), 17%, 34%, 34%, 44% for 4.5 log reduction (MR4.5), 12%, 32%, 29%, 41.5% for ≥5 log reduction (MR5), shown as cumulative incidence curves for MR4.5 in figure 1. The median doses of Peg-IFN delivered to the patients during the first year were 45 (0-45) micro.g/wk, and for nilotinib 600 (300-600) mg daily. Interestingly, logistic regression analysis adjusted on MR4.5 responses showed a significant relationship with the mean doses of Peg-IFN delivered to the patients at 12 months (p=0.003, OR = 1.09 [1.03-1.16]), 24 months (p=0.005, OR = 1.08 [1.02-1.14]) and 48 months (p=0.024, OR = 1.09 [1.01-1.17], but not with the mean doses of nilotinib [p=0.84, OR = 0.99 [0.99-1.01], p=0.087, OR = 1 [0.99-1.01], and p=0.88, OR = 1 [0.99-1.01] respectively. Eight patients (19.5%) were in TFR for a median of 6.8 (0.5-9.5) months after 2-year consecutive MR4.5, and none lost MMR yet at last follow-up. One patient died of progression (unmutated myeloid blast crisis at M6, who relapsed after unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation). There was no additional grade 3-4 hematologic or biochemical toxicities occurring after 24 months. At last follow-up 10 patients switched for another TKI (2 for dasatinib, 5 for imatinib, and 3 for imatinib followed by dasatinib), for unsufficient cytogenetic or molecular response (2 patients) or for toxicity (7 patients). Overall, 4 patients presented some cardio-vascular events 3 coronary stenoses, one brain stroke). Conclusion Despite additional initial toxicities Peg-IFN priming strategy, followed by the combination of nilotinib and Peg-IFN during the first year induces very high rates of durable deep molecular responses (MR4 and MR4.5) at later time-points, offering TFR for number of patients. To date, no emerging severe adverse events occurred. However, to confirm these promising results, a randomised phase III study testing nilotinib versus nilotinib + Peg-IFN is absolutely warranted and in progress. Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of MR4.5 Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of MR4.5 Disclosures Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Etienne:ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Congress Travel/Accomodations, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Roy:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Huguet:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Legros:ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Giraudier:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Coiteux:BMS: Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Guerci-Bresler:ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Amé:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Cony-Makhoul:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gardembas:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Hermet:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Rousselot:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Mahon:ARIAD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Switching to Nilotinib Is Associated with Continued Deeper Molecular Responses in CML-CP Patients with Minimal Residual Disease After ≥ 2 Years On Imatinib: Enestcmr 2-Year Follow-up Results

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 694-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽  
Nelson Spector ◽  
Brian Leber ◽  
Ricardo Pasquini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 694 Background: Superior rates of deeper molecular responses were achieved with nilotinib vs imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials—newly diagnosed patients (ENESTnd) trial. In addition, the 12-month (mo) analysis of the ENEST—complete molecular response (ENESTcmr) study demonstrated that switching to nilotinib after a minimum of 2 years on imatinib led to increased rates of major molecular response (MMR) and deeper molecular responses vs remaining on imatinib. Results from ENESTcmr are presented here with minimum 24 mo of patient follow-up. Methods: Patients with Ph+ CML-CP who had achieved complete cytogenetic responses but still had persistent BCR-ABL positivity by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) after ≥ 2 years on imatinib were eligible. Patients (n = 207) were randomized to switch to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 104) or to continue on the same dose of imatinib (400 or 600 mg once daily [QD]; n = 103). Rates of MMR, MR4 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.01% according to the International Scale [IS], corresponding to a 4-log reduction), MR4.5 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.0032%IS, corresponding to 4.5-log reduction), and undetectable BCR-ABL via RQ-PCR with ≥ 4.5-log sensitivity were measured. Results: Among all randomized patients (intent-to-treat population), significantly more patients treated with nilotinib continued to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo (32.7% on nilotinib vs 16.5% on imatinib; P =.005; Table).The difference between the arms in achievement of this endpoint increased between 1 and 2 years (from 12.4% to 16.2%). The median time to MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL was also significantly faster on nilotinib than on imatinib (P = .005 and .003, respectively). Cumulative rates of MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL continued to be higher with nilotinib in patients without those responses at baseline, and the difference between arms appeared to increase over time. The safety profiles for nilotinib and imatinib were consistent with prior studies. By 24 mo, no patients in either arm progressed to accelerated phase/blast crisis. No patients on nilotinib died since the 12-mo analysis; 1 patient on imatinib died from metastatic prostate cancer in follow-up after discontinuation from the study. Conclusions: Switching to nilotinib led to significantly faster, deeper molecular responses in patients with minimal residual disease on long-term imatinib therapy. Since the 12-mo analysis, rates of deep molecular response (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) have remained significantly higher in patients who did not have the response at baseline and were switched to nilotinib (vs those remaining on imatinib). In fact, the difference in favor of nilotinib increased between 1 and 2 years. These results suggest that switching to the more potent, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib is beneficial in patients with minimal residual disease after long-term imatinib therapy. Achievement of these deeper molecular responses (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) after switching to nilotinib may enable a greater proportion of CML-CP patients to be eligible for future discontinuation studies. Cumulative rates of confirmed undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo will be presented as the confirmation assessments for several responders were not available at the time of this analysis. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; CSL: Research Funding. Lipton:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Spector:Novarits: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Leber:Novartis: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Schwarer:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Etienne:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Purkayastha:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Collins:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Szczudlo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Cervantes:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Enestnd 4-Year (y) Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib Vs Imatinib in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1676-1676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Surapol Issaragrisil ◽  
Richard E Clark ◽  
Josy Reiffers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 1676 Background: Pts treated with nilotinib in the ENESTnd phase 3 trial achieved higher and faster rates of major molecular response (MMR, ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABLIS), deeper molecular responses (MR4, ≤ 0.01%IS and MR4.5, ≤ 0.0032%IS), significantly lower rates of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC), and fewer CML-related deaths compared with imatinib by 1, 2, and 3 y. Here, we report data with a minimum follow-up of 3 y; efficacy and safety data based on longer follow-up of 4 y will be presented to further assess the impact of nilotinib vs imatinib in pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP. Methods: Adult pts (N = 846) with newly-diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP were randomized to nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (BID; n = 282), nilotinib 400 mg BID (n = 281), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (QD; n = 283). MMR, MR4, MR4.5, time to progression to AP/BC, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: Significantly higher rates of MMR, MR4, and MR4.5 by 3 y were achieved in nilotinib- vs imatinib-treated pts (Table). Nilotinib led to the achievement of higher rates of molecular responses regardless of Sokal risk group or age. The difference in the rates of both MR4 and MR4.5 continued to be significantly higher for nilotinib, with the difference in favor of nilotinib increasing from 1 to 3 y (MR4: 9%-14% difference by 1 y, 18%-24% difference by 3 y; MR4.5: 6%-10% difference by 1 y, 13%-17% difference by 3 y). Among patients who achieved MMR, more pts achieved MR4 or MR4.5 on nilotinib 300 mg BID (68%) and nilotinib 400 mg BID (62%) compared with imatinib (49%). No pt in any arm progressed after achieving MR4.5. Significantly fewer pts progressed to AP/BC on nilotinib vs imatinib (Table). No new progressions occurred on core treatment between the 2-y and 3-y analyses. When events occurring after treatment discontinuation were included, the rates of progression to AP/BC were also significantly lower with nilotinib vs imatinib (Table). Nearly twice as many pts had emergent mutations on imatinib (n = 21) vs either nilotinib arm (n = 11 in each arm), with 5 pts overall developing mutations between 2 and 3 y. OS remained similar in all groups at 3 y, but fewer CML-related deaths occurred in both the nilotinib 300 mg BID (n = 5) and 400 mg BID (n = 4) arms vs imatinib (n = 14). Both drugs were well tolerated. Few new adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities were observed between 2 and 3 y. Rates of discontinuation due to AEs were 10%, 14%, and 11% in the nilotinib 300 mg BID, nilotinib 400 mg BID, and imatinib arms, respectively. Conclusions: Nilotinib continues to demonstrate superiority vs imatinib, yielding faster and deeper molecular responses and a significantly decreased risk of progression. Results of ENESTnd support the use of nilotinib as a standard of care option in newly diagnosed adult pts with Ph+ CML-CP and should be considered to replace imatinib as the standard-of-care frontline therapy for patients with Ph+ CML-CP. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kim:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Research Funding; II-Yang: Research Funding. Clark:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Reiffers:BMS: Expense reimbursement for travel expenses Other; Novartis: Expense reimbursement for travel expenses, Expense reimbursement for travel expenses Other. Nicolini:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hughes:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL: Research Funding. Hochhaus:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kemp:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Fan:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Waltzman:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Larson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Second Treatment Free Remission after Combination Therapy with Ruxolitinib Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555
Author(s):  
Kendra Sweet ◽  
Ehab L. Atallah ◽  
Jerry P. Radich ◽  
Mei-Jie Zhang ◽  
Eva Sahakian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Free Remission ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background: Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is feasible in a subset of CML patients who have maintained a deep molecular response for at least two years. Numerous discontinuation trials have been performed and consistently show approximately 50% of patients relapse after stopping TKIs. A recent study examining rates of treatment free remission (TFR) after a second attempt at stopping TKIs found, with a median follow up time of 38.3 months, 64.3% of patients had a molecular relapse (defined as a loss of major molecular response (MMR)). At 12, 24 and 36 months, TFR rates were 48%, 42% and 35%, respectively. These data suggest some patients with a history of molecular relapse upon TKI cessation could successfully stop treatment on a subsequent attempt, yet the majority will relapse a second time. 'Complete eradication' of CML remains elusive in most patients likely as a result of minimal residual disease (MRD), which is the result of BCR-ABL independent drug resistance. More specifically, CML cells that reside in sanctuary sites such as the bone marrow adhere to fibronectin and demonstrate cell adhesion mediated drug resistance (CAM-DR). The bone marrow microenvironment contains many cytokines and growth factors capable of inducing STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation via the JAK-STAT pathway leading to protection against TKI-induced cell death. Inhibiting JAK2 and TYK2 leads to complete inhibition of pSTAT3-Y705, thereby implicating the role of activation of JAK2 and TYK2 in STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation and resistance towards BCR-ABL TKI-induced cell death. A phase I clinical trial combined ruxolitinib, which inhibits JAK2 and TYK2, plus nilotinib in chronic phase (CP) CML patients and found that ruxolitinib 15mg PO BID was safe and well tolerated with 4/10 patients achieving undetectable BCR-ABL1 transcripts by PCR. Study Design and Methods: This single arm phase II study (NCT03610971) will enroll 41 subjects from the H Jean Khoury Cure CML Consortium. Eligible subjects must have a confirmed diagnosis of CP-CML and have previously attempted to discontinue TKI therapy per NCCN guidelines and had molecular recurrence, defined as loss of MMR, and were restarted on TKI. This trial combines ruxolitinib 15mg BID plus BCR-ABL TKI (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib or bosutinib) for 12 28-day cycles in the combination treatment phase (CTP). RQ-PCR to measure BCR-ABL transcripts will be checked at screening and every three months during the CTP. In the event that a subject experiences intolerance to a TKI, has confirmed loss of MMR, or loss of MR4.5 (>0.0032% IS) on two central PCR results, or discontinues ruxolitinib, the subject will be removed from CTP and enter into long term follow-up (LTFU). CTP phase will be followed by further RQ-PCR screening for the concurrent TFR phase. At this time ruxolitinib will be discontinued and any subject who has met the criteria for the TFR phase will be enrolled. During the TFR phase, subjects will discontinue their TKI and be monitored off treatment with RQ-PCR checked monthly for the first year, every six weeks for year two, and every 12 weeks during year three. Upon molecular recurrence, defined as loss of MMR, TKIs will be restarted. The primary endpoint is the 12-month TFR rate subsequent to completion of 12 cycles of combination therapy; however, subjects will remain in the TFR phase for three years. Therefore, the total duration of the trial will be approximately five years (one year on CTP + three years in the TFR phase + one-year LTFU). Study statistical design was calculated to yield a one-sided type I error rate of 0.025 and power of 65% when the true one-year relapse rate is 35%. This study will additionally assess patient-reported outcomes in conjunction with RQ-PCR testing. PROMIS and other measures will be self-administered through REDCap. Correlative studies will include comparing changes in pSTAT3 in K562 and KU812 cell lines using plasma from CML patients being treated with TKIs plus ruxolitinib, using the plasma inhibitory assay technique. Changes in pSTAT3 and pSTAT5 will be correlated with clinical response and rate of TFR. Additional correlatives include multiparameter flow-based assessment of the T-cell compartment (activity/polarization) as well as natural killer cell fractions in CML patients at various time points (TKIs alone, TKIs plus ruxolitinib and during TFR). Thus far, 14 patients have been enrolled. Disclosures Sweet: Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Atallah: Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Radich: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thompson: Novartis/ Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Mauro: Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharma / SPARC: Research Funding. Pinilla Ibarz: AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, TG Therapeutics, Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Advisory; Sellas: Other: ), patents/royalties/other intellectual property; MEI, Sunesis: Research Funding; AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Takeda: Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Ruxolitinib is being used off-label in chronic myeloid leukemia

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Nilotinib 300 Mg Twice Daily (BD) in Patients with CML in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Who Are Intolerant to Prior BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs): Results from the Randomized, Phase IIIb E.N.E.S.Tswift Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5447-5447
Author(s):  
Devendra K Hiwase ◽  
Peter Tan ◽  
James D'Rozario ◽  
John Taper ◽  
Anthony Richard Powell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Myeloproliferative Disease ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Treatment Interruptions

Abstract Background: Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) CML is a myeloproliferative disease characterized by the presence of the abnormal Ph+ in hematopoietic cells. Imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib are BCR-ABL TKIs commonly used in the treatment of CML-CP. Many patients on BCR-ABL TKI therapy will experience adverse events (AEs). Some of the more common AEs associated with first- and second-generation BCR-ABL TKIs include fluid retention, diarrhea, rash, musculoskeletal pain, nausea, vomiting, muscle cramps, and headache. Some patients will be unable to tolerate these AEs and will discontinue therapy. The current study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of nilotinib in patients with CML-CP who are responsive to but intolerant of treatment with imatinib or dasatinib. Although the study was stopped early due to low recruitment, here we present results on cross-intolerance and molecular response in the patients who were switched from imatinib or dasatinib to nilotinib. Methods: Eligible adult patients had: Ph+ CML-CP associated with BCR-ABL quantifiable by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR); received ≥3 months imatinib or dasatinib or both; were <1% (IS) BCR-ABL level in the blood during imatinib or dasatinib treatment; and were experiencing any non-hematological AEs (any grade) that persisted for ≥1 month or recurred at least once despite supportive care. After a washout period of ≥3 days, patients were switched to nilotinib 300 mg BD and treated for up to 24 months. The dose could be reduced to 450 mg QD for safety reasons. Treatment interruptions, dose reductions and dose re-escalation to 300 mg BD were allowed for management of AEs. The primary outcome was achievement of MR4.5 (BCR-ABL ≤0.0032%) by 24 months. Major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABL ≤0.1%) and MR4.0 (BCR-ABL ≤0.01%) were also assessed in an exploratory capacity at each visit (month 1, 2, 3, then every 3 months to month 24). Secondary endpoints included the kinetics of molecular response. Preliminary results are summarized descriptively. Planned enrolment was 130 patients. Results: The study was stopped early due to low recruitment; 20 patients were enrolled (mean age 53.9 years [range 31-77]; 14 female). 16 patients had received prior imatinib therapy, 4 patients prior dasatinib. Median nilotinib treatment duration was 494 days (mean 480, SD 167.6 days). At screening, 30% of patients were not in MMR, 45% had MMR and 25% had MR4.0. By month 3 and 24 of nilotinib treatment, 55% (11/20) and 65% (13/20) of patients, respectively, achieved at least a 1 log reduction in BCR-ABL levels. 35% (7/20) of patients achieved MR4.5 between baseline and month 3 of nilotinib treatment, and 50% (10/20) achieved MR4.5 at any time up to month 24. The proportion of patients with a molecular response at each visit up to month 15 is shown in the Figure. AEs during prior treatment with imatinib and dasatinib included gastrointestinal events (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), superficial edema, myalgia, fatigue, rash, and headache, among others. 68% of AEs had resolved by month 3 of nilotinib treatment. Among the 13 evaluable patients on prior imatinib, 7 (54%) had resolution of all AEs during treatment with nilotinib; of 3 evaluable patients on prior dasatinib, 3 (100%) had AE resolution on nilotinib. Grade 3/4 AEs during nilotinib therapy occurred in 3 patients: diabetes mellitus, fatigue, neutropenia, pneumonia, osteoarthritis, and hyperuricemia. Conclusions: Although early termination of the study has not allowed for a robust analysis, these results suggest that nilotinib is effective and well tolerated in most patients intolerant of imatinib or dasatinib. During the first 3 months of switching to nilotinib, 55% of patients had achieved at least a 1 log reduction in BCR-ABL levels, and 35% of patients had achieved MR4.5. The cumulative rate of MR4.5 by 24 months was 50%. Achievement of this endpoint has been linked to favorable long-term outcomes, such as treatment-free remission. Furthermore, the majority of the AEs had resolved by month 3 of nilotinib therapy. This improved tolerance to nilotinib may result in improved treatment adherence. As such, although further study in a larger population is needed for confirmation, these results provide further evidence that nilotinib is a favorable option to establish a molecular response in patients intolerant of imatinib or dasatinib. Disclosures D'Rozario: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Branford:Qiagen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cepheid: Consultancy. Yeung:Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Anderson:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Gervasio:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Hughes:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcome of Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Nilotinib Front-Line

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Franck E Nicolini ◽  
Vincent Alcazer ◽  
Pascale Cony-Makhoul ◽  
Stephanie Dulucq ◽  
Sandrine Hayette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Nilotinib (NIL) 600 mg daily has demonstrated its superiority over Imatinib 400 mg daily in terms of response and incidence of deep molecular response in the front-line chronic phase (CP) CML setting. In this observational study we have retrospectively analyzed the outcome of in- and out-study 202 patients (pts) treated in this setting with NIL 600 mg front-line, in "real-life" conditions. All pts with newly diagnosed adult CP-CML receiving NIL 300 mg BID alone front-line between 10/2007 and 06/2020, were eligible for this study. Data were retrospectively collected according to the current French regulations with pts' information. All pts were assessed and followed according to ELN recommendations 2003, 2006, and 2009 along treatment and to the recommendations from the French group of CML (D. Rea et al., Cancer 2018) in case of TFR. In this regard, a TKI was resumed if loss of MMR. All BCR-ABL1 assessments were performed in the 3 reference laboratories, standardised and expressed in % (IS) with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. The primary endpoints were the rate of molecular responses in the long-term and the (vascular) safety of Nilotinib. Secondary endpoints were the kinetics of molecular response, survival and safety of Nilotinib. Survival (OS, PFS & EFS) was defined according to ELN (J. Guilhot et al. Blood 2012). Two hundred and two patients were reported with 44% females and 56% males with a median age at diagnosis of 50.4 (17.5-83) years, and 26% of them had cardiovascular risk factors at onset (tobacco abuse 11%, hypercholesterolemia 9.3%, diabetes 1.45%, none with past history of cardiovascular events [CVE]). ELTS scores were high in 14%, intermediate in 31% and low in 55% of pts. Twenty-four (12%) pts harboured additional chromosomal abnormalities at diagnosis. The median follow-up after NIL initiation was 61.5 (1-147.5) months. At last follow-up 113 pts (55%) are not on NIL anymore for toxicities, TFR or resistance reasons. Twenty-eight (14%) pts present an arterial event on NIL (18% PAOD, 14% angina pectoralis, 7% myocardial infarction, 14% stroke, 47% others such as atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy...), that occurred after a median of 26 (0.6-98.5) months on NIL. Forty-six (22.5%) pts reached TFR criteria and stopped NIL after a median of 58.5 (27-126) months. The cumulative incidence (CI) rates of MMR at 1, 2 and 5 years were 64 (57-71)%, 79.4 (75.45-83.35)% and 95 (92-98.5)% respectively. For MR4, those were 35.5 (29-42)%, 60 (52-67)% and 82 (74.5-89)% respectively; and for MR4.5, were 14 (9-19)%, 31 (24-28)% and 62 (54-70.5)% respectively. The CI of sustained MR4.5 (i. e. patients eligible for TFR: MR4.5 ≥2 years) was observed in 30 (23-37)% at 3 years, 45.5 (36-55)% at 5 years and 52.5 (41.5-64)% at 6 years (Figure). The CI of patients entering TFR was 16.75 (10.5-23)% at 5 years and 51.94 (37.31-66.57)% at 10 years with a survival without MMR loss of 70.7 (58- 86)% at 1 year and 65.26 (50.6-84)% at 5 years. Nine (4.5%) pts progressed towards accelerated phase (4 pts) or BC (2 lymphoid, 3 myeloid) responsible for 5 deaths at latest follow-up. Among NIL resistant patients screened, 15 were harbouring ABL1 mutations (5 Y253H, 3 E255K, 3 T315I, 1 M244V, 1 G250E, 1 F359V, 1 V299L). Overall, 10 patients died (5 from CML, 5 from unrelated causes). The probability of OS was 95.75 [95%CI: 92.9-98.7]% at 2 years and 94.8 [91.5-98.3]% at 5 years, for PFS it was 94.92 [91.7-98.2]% at 2 years and 89.5 [84.7-94.6]% at 5 years, and EFS it was 78 [72.3-84]% at 2 years and 60.25 [53.3-68.1]% at 5 years. Regarding sustained MR4.5, univariate analysis showed that female gender (HR=2.46 [1.50-4.02], p&lt;0.001) and low ELTS (HR=0.41 [0.22-0.76], p&lt;0.004) had a significant impact, while multivariate analysis confirmed the role of these 2 factors (HR=2.31 [1.41- 3.79], p=0.001 and HR= 0.52 [0.30- 0.90], p=0.02) in addition to high ELTS (HR= 0.28 [0.14- 0.58], p&lt;0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that only age impacted on the CI of CVE (HR= 1.07 [1.04-1.10], p&lt;0.001, and HR=1.07 [1.04-1.10], p&lt;0.001). NIL first-line efficiently limits progression of newly diagnosed CP-CML patients and provides high rates of sustained MR4.5, allowing TFR in a substantial proportion of pts. However, the onset of arterial occlusive events, especially in the elderly is a matter of concern in the choice of this compound at treatment initiation. Disclosures Nicolini: Incyte: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma Ltd: Consultancy. Cony-Makhoul:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Dulucq:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Cayuela:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mahon:ARIAD: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Etienne:Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Selective Escalation of Imatinib Therapy and Early Switching to Nilotinib In De Novo Chronic Phase CML Patients: Interim Results From the TIDEL-II Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 209-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Yeung ◽  
Michael Osborn ◽  
Deborah L. White ◽  
Susan Branford ◽  
Lauren Haswell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Treatment Targets ◽  
T315i Mutation

Abstract Abstract 209 Background: Although the majority of chronic phase (CP) Philadelphia positive (Ph+) chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients (pts) achieve good disease control with imatinib, some pts demonstrate suboptimal responses. Early dose escalation or switching to nilotinib, a more potent BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor, as soon as suboptimal molecular response is recognised may improve response and disease outcome. Aim: To optimise clinical and molecular outcomes in Ph+ CML using imatinib (IM) as frontline therapy with selective IM dose escalation based on pharmacokinetic (PK) results and switching to nilotinib (NIL) in case of suboptimal response, or IM-intolerance. Method: TIDEL-II is a multicentre, single arm prospective ALLG trial in de novo CP-CML pts with 2 separate sequential cohorts. In Cohort I, pts are treated with IM 600mg/d up-front, aiming for BCR-ABL RQ-PCR target values of ≤ 10%, 1%, and 0.1% IS (major molecular response, MMR) at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively. Pts who do not reach these treatment targets are classified as suboptimal responders. Dose escalation to 800mg/d or maximal tolerated dose occurs if trough IM level is <1000ng/mL at day 22, or for suboptimal response. A switch to NIL (400mg bid) is triggered if molecular targets are still not met 3 months after IM escalation, or for loss or response, or for IM intolerance (Grade III/IV or persistent Grade II non-haematological toxicity). Results: 105 pts were assessed with median follow up of 18.9 months (range: 9–33) in cohort I. For pts with a minimum of 12 months follow up (n=80), complete cytogenetic response (CCR), MMR and complete molecular response (CMR)# rates at 12 months were 92%, 66% and 11% respectively. BCR-ABL levels at 3 months were predictive of MMR at 12 months, but not for CMR due to small pt numbers (Table 1). For pts who failed to achieve BCR-ABL of ≤10% at 3 months, the 12 month MMR rate was 25% (vs 5% in TIDEL-I where pts were also started on IM 600mg/d and suboptimal responders were dose escalated to IM 800mg/d). Of the 105 pts, 16 pts dose escalated IM due to a day 22 IM blood level <1000ng/mL, after which 2/16 switched to NIL (1 suboptimal, 1 intolerant); all achieved CCR. Twelve pts dose escalated for suboptimal response, 7 subsequently switched to NIL for again failing treatment targets. In all, 21/105 pts (20%) switched to NIL: 7 for suboptimal response and 14 for intolerance. The median time to switching and the median pre-switch prescribed IM dose were 468 days & 800mg/d for the suboptimal group; and 183 days & 600mg/d for the intolerant group respectively. Of these, 20/21 achieved or remained in CCR. At the time of switching to NIL, 19/21 pts were not in MMR. With a median follow-up of 295 days post switch to NIL, 9/12 intolerant pts (75%) achieved MMR, whereas 1/7 suboptimal IM responders (14%) achieved MMR (median follow up after switching: 286 days). Only 7/105 pts (7%) discontinued treatment: 4 for non-compliance, 1 pt with a T315I mutation and 2 pts with blast crisis (BC). Progression to BC was associated with detectable mutations: 1 pt with 4 different mutations including T315I and 1 pt with H396P mutation. The progression rate to AP/BC was 2%. The overall mutation rate was 5/105 (5%). The 2 pts who progressed and the pt who discontinued when a T315I mutation was detected were among the 28 pts with BCR-ABL values >1.0% at 3 months. In contrast, no resistant mutations were detected or transformations occurred in the 49 pts with BCR-ABL values ≤1.0% at 3 months. Conclusion: A strategy of selective intensification of BCR-ABL inhibitor therapy based on molecular response and PK values resulted in a 66% MMR rate by 12 months. Despite a minority of pts (20%) requiring a switch to NIL, this has enhanced the rate of MMR by 12 months when compared to IM intensification alone as seen in TIDEL-I where the rate of MMR and CMR by 12 months was 47% and 9% respectively. The IM intolerant pts demonstrated excellent response rates after switching to NIL. To date, the results from TIDEL-II compare favourably with other frontline strategies with regards to response and transformation rates. Disclosures: Yeung: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Osborn:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. White:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Branford:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Slader:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ross:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mills:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hughes:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria.

The Strategy of Early Nilotinib Switch Based on Failure to Achieve Optimal Molecular Targets on Imatinib May Not Overcome the Negative Impact of a Low OCT-1 Activity in De-Novo CP-CML Patients

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1690-1690
Author(s):  
Deborah L. White ◽  
Verity A Saunders ◽  
Amity Frede ◽  
Kelvin GrootObbink ◽  
Cassandra Slader ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Molecular Targets ◽  
Molecular Target ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Abstract 1690 Background: We have previously identified that low OCT-1 activity (OA) is a poor prognostic indicator in CP-CML patients treated with imatinib (IM). Importantly, a very low OA (OA≤4ng/200,000 cells) is associated with a significant risk of poor molecular response, kinase domain mutations and transformation. The TIDEL II strategy of early intervention, via dose escalation and/or switch to nilotinib (NIL) may reduce the incidence of poor response/therapeutic failure in CP-CML patients, particularly those with very low OA. Methods: Patients in Cohort I (n=105) of the TIDEL II trial were switched to NIL for either IM intolerance, or failure to demonstrate a clinical benefit from IM dose escalation which was triggered by failure to achieve time dependent molecular targets: ≤10% BCR-ABL by 3 m, ≤1% BCR-ABL by 6 m or ≤0.1% BCR-ABL by 12 m. In Cohort II (n=105) patients failing to achieve these molecular targets were switched directly to NIL without prior IM dose intensification. All patients, where possible, had OA measured at diagnosis. Only therapeutic changes prior to 24 months, and patients with a minimum of 6 months exposure to NIL are considered in this analysis. Results: (Table 1) Cohort I: Median follow-up 30 months. The overall rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months was 66%. There was a significant difference in the rate of MMR between patients with low OA (n=49) compared to those with higher OA (n= 54): 49% vs 76%, p=0.007. The overall rate of MMR by 24 months was 81%. Again, patients with low OA (n=46) achieved MMR at a significantly lower rate compared to those with higher OA (n=54): 65% vs 91%, p= 0.003. Thirty patients have switched to NIL, 19/30 because of IM intolerance (av. time on IM 8.5m.) and 11/30 because of molecular target failure (av. time on IM 12.8m). 14/14 intolerant patients not in MMR at the time of switch have achieved MMR on NIL with an average log reduction of 2.8, and 9/18 have achieved CMR. In contrast, 1/9 patients switched for molecular target failure has achieved MMR on NIL, with an average log reduction of 0.65. Importantly, 3/19 withdrew from study due to CML related events. Cohort II: Median follow-up 12 months. To date, 22/105 patients have switched to NIL and have a minimum of 6 months follow-up: 11 for intolerance and 11 for molecular target failure. All patients switched for intolerance achieved and/or maintained MMR on nilotinib, with an average log reduction of 2.89. In contrast, 1/11 patients switched for molecular target failure achieved MMR, with an average log reduction of 0.95 and CCyR has been achieved in 5/10 patients not previously in CCyR. 2/11 of these patients have withdrawn from study. There was a significant difference in the time of switch to NIL, and the length of imatinib exposure between the 2 cohorts for intolerance, and a significant difference between the cohorts in the length of IM exposure for patients with target failure. However, this did not translate to a significant difference in molecular response between the 2 cohorts, suggesting the length of prior IM exposure is not a determinant of subsequent NIL response. Importantly in both cohorts, the OA of those patients switched to NIL based on molecular target failure was significantly lower than that of those who switched for intolerance (p=0.007 and p=0.003) and those patients remaining on IM (p=0.004). Conclusion: Switch to NIL significantly improves response in IM intolerant patients. The majority of patients who switch for molecular target failure on IM do not subsequently achieve MMR on NIL. This suggests that a low OA may delineate a group of CP-CML patients intrinsically insensitive to TKI therapy, for whom switch to NIL either following IM dose intensification (Cohort 1) or as a primary strategy (Cohort II) may not result in an improvement in response. A different first-line strategy may be more effective for this poor risk subgroup. Disclosures: White: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Slader:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yeung:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; BMS Oncology: Research Funding. Osborn:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; BMS Oncology: Research Funding. Mills:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Sponsorship to professional meetings; BMS Oncology:. Hughes:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Imatinib as Second-Line Therapy, Ameliorates or Maintains Molecular Responses Obtained with Ponatinib First-Line in Chronic Phase CML Patients

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1894-1894
Author(s):  
Franck E. Nicolini ◽  
Gaelle Fossard ◽  
Valerie Coiteux ◽  
Viviane Dubruille ◽  
Vincent Alcazer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Front Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Line Setting

Abstract Background & aims The third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Ponatinib demonstrates extremely potent BCR-ABL inhibitory activity in CML patients in chronic or advanced phase, resistant to 1, 2 or 3 prior TKI (Cortes NEJM, 2013) and it seemed interesting to test this agent in the front-line setting of chronic phase patients. The EPIC trial was a phase III trial set up to compare the molecular outcomes of Imatinib 400 (IM400) versus Ponatinib 45 mg daily at one year. However, this trial has been abrogated at early stages by the FDA despite the impressive molecular efficacy of Ponatinib (Lipton, Lancet Oncol 2016) because of unexpected and unacceptable rates of arterial thrombotic events that occurred in another trial (PACE). A majority of patients in the Ponatinib arm were switched towards IM400, but their outcome is not known. The aim of this study was to analyse the general and molecular outcomes of such patients in our country. Methods This is an observational study following the rules and regulations of these studies in our country. Data were monitored and retrospectively collected in the 5 centers involved in the EPIC trial. Molecular analyses were performed locally during ponatinib exposure (in parallel with centralised assessments) and during IM treatment thereafter. Only local results, expressed in % BCR-ABL (IS), were used in this analysis, and all respective molecular biology laboratories have been involved in the Eutos/ELN BCR-ABL accreditation system. Results Thirteen patients were analysed, 9 males and 4 females, with a median age of 58.5 (range 19.5-69) years at chronic phase CML diagnosis. Sokal scores were low for 4, intermediate for 7, high for 2 patients, Euro score was low for 7, intermediate for 5 and high for 1, Eutos LTS score was low for 10, intermediate for 2 and high for 1. Patients were harbouring a "conventional" Philadelphia chromosome without clonal evolution (20-28 metaphases analysed/patient) at diagnosis. All patients were harbouring a Major BCR-ABL transcript. The median BCR-ABL transcript level was 109 (range 35-440) % at diagnosis. Blood pressure was normal in all patients at diagnosis except one. Ponatinib was initiated in all patients at 45 mg daily after a median of 1.5 (range 0.8-2.75) months after diagnosis. Median Ponatinib duration was 4 (range 0.5-6.3) months. Complete Hematologic Response was obtained in 0.98 (range 0.5-1) month in all patients. At 3 months, median BCR-ABL ratio was 0.19 (range 0.008-2.74) %, all patients being in early molecular response (EMR) and 4 patients being already in major molecular response (MMR). Median Ponatinib dose at cessation was 45 (range 0-45) mg daily. IM was started at 400 mg daily in all patients after a median of 1 (range 1-35) day after Ponatinib cessation and after a median of 4 (range 0.54-6.54) months after Ponatinib initiation. The median BCR-ABL transcripts at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 months of Ponatinib (i.e. after a median time of 7, 10, 16, 22, 28, 34, 40 and 46 months of IM) were 0.22 (range 0.01-27)%, 0.08 (0.005-8.99)%, 0.08 (0.01-2.01)%, 0.1 (0.003-1.9)%, 0.03 (0.001-1.61)%, 0.01 (<0.001-0.21)%, 0.01 (0.001-0.21) and 0.01 (0.001-0.02) respectively (see figure 1). On the 10 evaluable patients for molecular analyses, at Ponatinib cessation 40% of patients were >MMR, 40% of patients in MMR, 20% in MR4. At last follow-up, on IM400 10% of patients were in >MMR, 40% in MMR, 20% in MR4, 10% in MR4.5 and 20% in MR5, i. e. 50% in deep molecular response. At last follow-up, all patients were alive, still on IM400 daily for 32 (27.75-37.4) months, except 4 [1 grade 3 asthenia (now on Dasatinib), 2 molecular failure (now on Dasatinib and Bosutinib)], 1 free of treatment]. None of the patients progressed towards advanced phases to date. No thrombotic events occurred in any of the patients on Ponatinib. Three patients developed hypertension on Ponatinib requiring treatment, still ongoing at last follow-up in all. Conclusion The use of Imatinib after Ponatinib first-line therapy for chronic phase CML patients is safe. Despite a significant tyrosine kinase inhibition inferior activity in vitro, it allows the maintenance or the improvement of molecular responses throughout time and serves as a consolidation therapy. These data might pave the way for the design of future clinical trials using Ponatinib in the front-line setting in conjunction with Ponatinib dose reduction. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Ariad, BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Coiteux:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Speakers Bureau. Mouchel:Ariad/Incyte: Employment. Mahon:BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria. Etienne:novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Guerci:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ARIAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Updated 18-Month Results from Dasfree: A Study Evaluating Dasatinib Discontinuation in Patients (Pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and Deep Molecular Response (DMR)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4253-4253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil P. Shah ◽  
Jose Valentín García Gutiérrez ◽  
Antonio Jiménez-Velasco ◽  
Sarah Larson ◽  
Susanne Saussele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) discontinuation is being investigated in pts with CML-CP with sustained DMR (defined here as MR4.5 or BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.0032% on the International Scale [IS]), with the goal of treatment-free remission (TFR). Successful TFR has been reported previously for pts enrolled in DASFREE (CA180-406/NCT01850004), which showed that 48% of CML-CP pts with DMR for ≥ 1 year were able to stop dasatinib and maintain major molecular response (MMR) 12 months after discontinuation. Here we present updated results from pts followed for a minimum of 18 months, in order to understand the durability of TFR beyond 12 months. Methods: DASFREE is a phase 2, open-label, single-arm study in adult pts with CML-CP on dasatinib for ≥ 2 years as 1st-line or subsequent therapy. Eligible pts had dasatinib-induced DMR (MR4.5) confirmed at a local lab for ≥ 1 year prior to enrollment, with a 1-log reduction in BCR-ABL1 from baseline within 3-6.5 months of starting dasatinib. MR4.5 was confirmed at a central lab twice within 3 months prior to dasatinib discontinuation (screening phase). BCR-ABL1 was monitored centrally after discontinuation every month in the 1st year, then every 3 months. Pts resumed dasatinib at their previous dose if MMR was lost. The primary endpoint is the rate of MMR 12 months after dasatinib discontinuation. Secondary endpoints include BCR-ABL1 kinetics, molecular relapse-free survival (MRFS; no loss of MMR), relapse-free survival (RFS; no loss of MMR, complete cytogenetic response, or complete hematologic response, or progression to accelerated/blast phase [AP/BP] CML), rate of transformation to AP/BP, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory analyses include frequency of adverse events (AEs) after discontinuation and during dasatinib treatment, and MMR after reinitiating dasatinib. Results: In total, 84 pts enrolled between February 2014 and June 2016 discontinued dasatinib; all had ≥ 18 months of follow-up after discontinuation at the time of this analysis. Pt characteristics were previously reported (the majority [64%] had low Sokal scores; no pt had prior interferon; 37 pts were on 1st-line dasatinib, 47 on subsequent lines of dasatinib). At 18 months after discontinuation, the RFS rate was 48% (95% CI 37-58) in all pts (Figure), 54% (95% CI 38, 70) in 1st-line pts, and 42% (95% CI 28, 57) in pts who received subsequent-line therapy. With longer follow-up, 1 additional pt lost MMR at 18 months following discontinuation. Of the 45 pts who lost MMR and restarted treatment, 44 regained MMR (1 pt discontinued after only 1 molecular assessment) in a median of 2 months (range 1-4) and 42 regained MR4.5 in a median of 3 months (range 2-18). Analyses of baseline pt characteristics revealed that for the 40 pts who did not lose MMR after discontinuation, 15 (37.5%) were able to maintain MR4.5. Additionally, the median time in prior MR4.5 was 28 months (range 13-116) for all pts, and was similar for 1st-line pts who maintained (27 months [range 13-56]) or lost MMR (27 months [range 15-68]) at 12 months. With longer follow-up, AEs (any cause) identified were consistent with previous reports and were found to be similar on and off treatment: 8 (10%) pts off treatment and 8 (18%) pts on treatment experienced grade 3/4 AEs of any cause after restarting dasatinib (4.4% were drug related). No transformation events or deaths occurred. Of the 13 reported withdrawal events occurring in 8 (9.5%) pts, 10 were resolved (5 off treatment, 5 resolved after restarting treatment due to loss of MMR) after a median of 5 months (range 1-12) after onset. One pt discontinued after restarting dasatinib due to malignancy unrelated to treatment. In addition to efficacy and safety data, multivariate analyses evaluating prognostic factors for MMR will be presented. Conclusions: Additional follow-up of pts enrolled in DASFREE revealed that TFR remained durable at 18 months after discontinuing dasatinib. AEs reported here were consistent with the known safety profile of dasatinib, and withdrawal was well tolerated. Collectively, this trial, the largest dasatinib discontinuation trial to date, continues to support the feasibility and practicality of TFR in pts with CML-CP in DMR treated with dasatinib in the 1st line and beyond. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Shah: ARIAD: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. García Gutiérrez:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Larson:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Saussele:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Rea:Incyte: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria. Mahon:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Levy:Takeda (Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.): Consultancy. Gómez-Casares:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Pane:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy. Nicolini:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mauro:Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sy:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Martin Regueira:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lipton:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals The TKI-Free Duration after a First Discontinuation Attempt That Failed in CP CML Patients Is a Predictive Factor of TKI-Free Remission after a Second Attempt

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 28-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Legros ◽  
Franck E Nicolini ◽  
Gabriel Etienne ◽  
Philippe Rousselot ◽  
Delphine Rea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Tki Discontinuation

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are able to induce, in some chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in chronic phase (CP), long-term molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) and several studies have now demonstrated that TKIs could be safely discontinued in those patients with a Treatment-Free Remission (TFR) rate reaching ~50%. The French CML group had recently demonstrated that a failure of the first TKI discontinuation attempt does not preclude a 2nd successful attempt (RE-STIM study, Legros et al. Cancer 2017). Methods: The RE-STIM study is a national observational multicentre study collecting all cases of 2nd TKI discontinuation attempt of regardless the type, the duration of TKI, the duration of MR4.5 and the reason of discontinuation. CP-CML Patients in failure of a 1st attempt, had to recover a 2nd sustained MR4.5 on TKI to be eligible for this new analysis of the enlarged database (n=106). Loss of MMR loss was the trigger for therapy re-introduction. Results: At the time of analysis (1st June 2019), 106 patients (median age: 55 years (range: 25-81 years)) were included with 41 months (2-131) of follow-up after 2nd discontinuation. Fifty males and 56 females were enrolled. The Sokal risk score was low in 45%, intermediate in 26.5%, high in 20% and unknown in 8.5% of patients. The majority of patients (95%) were treated with imatinib as first-line, and the others with a 2nd generation TKI. The median total time on TKI prior to a 2nd discontinuation was 104 months (range: 38-235) and the median duration of a 2nd MR4.5 prior to a 2nd discontinuation was 68 months (range: 20-176). After a 1st discontinuation attempt, the reason for TKI re-challenge was in majority a loss of MMR (66%), a loss of MR4.5 in 33% of patients (missing data in 1%). The TFR rates after a 2nd discontinuation attempt were 44.3% [95% CI 35.48-55.41] at 24 months, 38.5% [95% CI 29.65- 50.09] at 36 months and 33.2% [95% CI 24.31- 45.39] at 48 months. In univariate analysis, we failed to find any association between TFR and: age, gender, Sokal score, prior exposure to IFN, TKI in combination versus monotherapy, TKI type, TKI treatment duration and uMR4.5 duration before the 1st and 2nd discontinuation attempts, and type of molecular relapse after the 1st discontinuation attempt (MR4.5 versus MMR loss). However, the speed of molecular relapse after the 1st TKI discontinuation remains a factor significantly associated with outcome. In patients who remained in uMR4.5 at 3 months after the 1st discontinuation, the TFR rate at 48 months was 53% [95% CI: 35.32-79.31] and 26% [95% CI: 16.88-40.28] for others. Another factor significantly associated with outcome is the TKI-free duration after the 1st attempt (Figure). The TFR rate at 48 months was 45 % [95% CI: 28.64- 69.62] in patients who remained without treatment more than 6 months after their 1st attempt and 27% [95% CI: 17.57- 41.34] for others. All patients are alive at last follow-up except 2 who died from CML-unrelated reasons. One patient developed a sudden blast crisis at 4 years from 2nd discontinuation. The last previous molecular biology 3 months before transformation was MR4. In patients in TKI re-challenge (n=63), median TKI-free duration was 6 months (2-64), 55% of patients regained their MMR within 3 months (0-35) and 41% regained MR4.5 within 5 months (2-53). Conclusions: This larger cohort confirms that TKIs could safely and successfully be discontinued a 2nd time in CP CML patients despite a 1st failure. The speed of molecular relapse after the 1st TKI discontinuation and TKI-free duration remain major factors significantly associated with TFR outcome. Figure: TFR according TKI-free duration after the 1st attempt of discontinuation Figure Disclosures Legros: Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Nicolini:Sun Pharma Ltd: Consultancy; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Etienne:BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rousselot:Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Rea:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria. Guerci:INCYTE: Consultancy, Honoraria. Huguet:Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Coiteux:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mahon:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document