Impact of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease on Long-Term Outcomes of Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Adults with High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission

Abstract Background : The role of reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC-HCT) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains unclear because the interpretation of transplantation outcome is mainly limited by the small sample size, short follow-up duration, various regimens for conditioning and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and the heterogeneity of the criteria used to select patients for RIC-HCT. Previously, we conducted a phase 2 trial of RIC-HCT in adults with high-risk ALL who were ineligible for myeloablative conditioning and showed the potential role of this strategy, especially in patients in first complete remission (CR1). Here, we report the long-term outcomes of RIC-HCT by analyzing 122 consecutive adults with high-risk ALL in CR1, particularly focusing on the prognostic relevance of chronic GVHD. Methods: During the period between 2000 and 2014, 122 patients in CR1 (median age, 52 years [range, 15-65 years]; 54 Ph-negative ALL and 68 Ph-positive ALL) were given an identical RIC regimen consisting of fludarabine (150 mg/m2 in total) and melphalan (140 mg/m2in total). The indications for RIC-HCT were advanced age (≥50 years; n=79; 64.8%) and comorbid conditions (n=43; 35.2%). Graft sources were peripheral blood stem cells (n=118; 66 matched sibling donor, 23 matched unrelated donor, 29 mismatched unrelated donor) and bone marrow (n=4; 1 matched sibling donor, 1 matched unrelated donor, 2 mismatched unrelated donor). The median time to transplantation was 155.5 days (range, 103-291 days). GVHD prophylaxis was attempted by administering calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine for sibling donor transplants, tacrolimus for unrelated donor transplants) plus methotrexate. Antithymocyte globulin was administered to the patients who received mismatched unrelated donor grafts. If residual leukemia was detected in the absence of GVHD at 3 months after transplantation, calcineurin inhibitors were rapidly discontinued. Results: The median time for neutrophil and platelet recovery was 12 days (range, 8-30 days) and 13 days (range, 5-60 days) after RIC-HCT. Sixty-two patients developed acute GVHD (53 grade II, 5 grade III, 4 grade IV). The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 1 year was 50.8% (42.6% for Ph-negative and 57.4% for Ph-positive, P=0.152). Except for 11 patients with early deaths within 100 days, 77 developed chronic GVHD (30 mild, 29 moderate, 18 severe), resulting in a 5-year cumulative incidence of 63.6% (69.1% for Ph-negative ALL and 58.8% for Ph-positive ALL, P=0.319). The median time to onset of chronic GVHD was 140 days (range, 37-843 days) after transplantation. Cytomegalovirus reactivation >10,000 copies/mL was observed in 40.2% (44.4% for Ph-negative ALL and 36.8% for Ph-positive ALL, P=0.447). After a median follow-up duration of 57.9 months (range, 17.7-206.8 months), the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 27.5% (23.9% for Ph-negative ALL and 30.2% for Ph-positive ALL) and 19.0% (17.4% for Ph-negative ALL and 20.3% for Ph-positive ALL), respectively, and the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 53.5% (58.4% for Ph-negative ALL and 49.7% for Ph-positive ALL) and 59.8% (60.2% for Ph-negative ALL and 59.3% for Ph-positive ALL). In multivariate analysis, the presence of chronic GVHD lowered CIR (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10-0.48; P<0.001), but severe chronic GVHD increased NRM (HR, 8.76; 95% CI, 3.39-22.6; P<0.001). Thus, the presence of mild to moderate chronic GVHD was closely related to better outcomes in terms of DFS (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.32-0.64; P<0.001) and OS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.64; P<0.001) in all patients as well as in both subgroups of patients. In Ph-positive ALL subgroup of patients, patients without achievement of major molecular response until the time of transplantation had also significantly higher CIR (HR, 7.42; 95% CI, 3.04-18.10; P<0.001) and poorer DFS (HR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.48-8.14; P=0.004) and OS (HR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.03-6.47; P=0.043). Conclusion: Our long-term follow-up data with a uniform treatment strategy suggest that RIC-HCT is a valid alternative choice for providing a long-term disease control for adult high-risk ALL patients in CR1. Minimal residual disease-based treatment strategies to reduce leukemia cell burden before HCT and to enhance the graft-versus-leukemia effect are needed in the future. Disclosures Kim: ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lee:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Conventional Immunochemotherapy (R-CHOEP) Vs High-Dose Immunochemotherapy (R-MegaCHOEP) in Younger Patients with High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: 10-Year Long-Term Follow-up of a German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA) Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123637 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1589-1589

Author(s):

Fabian Frontzek ◽

Marita Ziepert ◽

Maike Nickelsen ◽

Bettina Altmann ◽

Bertram Glass ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Scientific Advisory Board ◽

Scientific Advisory

Introduction: The R-MegaCHOEP trial showed that dose-escalation of conventional chemotherapy necessitating autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) does not confer a survival benefit for younger patients (pts) with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the Rituximab era (Schmitz et al., Lancet Oncology 2012; 13, 1250-1259). To describe efficacy and toxicity over time and document the long-term risks of relapse and secondary malignancy we present the 10-year follow-up of this study. Methods: In the randomized, prospective phase 3 trial R-MegaCHOEP younger pts aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk (aaIPI 2-3) aggressive B-cell lymphoma were assigned to 8 cycles of CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubcine, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone) or 4 cycles of dose-escalated high-dose therapy (HDT) necessitating repetitive ASCT both combined with Rituximab. Both arms were stratified according to aaIPI, bulky disease, and center. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). All analyses were calculated for the intention-to-treat population. This follow-up report includes molecular data based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC (IHC: 31/92 positive [40-100%], FISH: 14/103 positive), BCL2 (IHC: 65/89 positive [50-100%], FISH: 23/111 positive) and BCL6 (IHC: 52/86 positive [30-100%], FISH: 34/110 positive) and data on cell of origin (COO) classification according to the Lymph2CX assay (GCB: 53/88; ABC: 24/88; unclassified: 11/88). Results: 130 pts had been assigned to R-CHOEP and 132 to R-MegaCHOEP. DLBCL was the most common lymphoma subtype (~80%). 73% of pts scored an aaIPI of 2 and 27% an aaIPI of 3. 60% of pts had an initial lymphoma bulk and in 40% more than 1 extranodal site was involved. After a median observation time of 111 months, EFS at 10 years was 57% (95% CI 47-67%) in the R-CHOEP vs. 51% in the R-MegaCHOEP arm (42-61%) (hazard ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8, p=0.228), overall survival (OS) after 10 years was 72% (63-81%) vs. 66% (57-76%) respectively (p=0.249). With regard to molecular characterization, we were unable to detect a significant benefit for HDT/ASCT in any subgroup analyzed. In total, 16% of pts (30 pts) relapsed after having achieved a complete remission (CR). 23% of all relapses (7 pts) showed an indolent histology (follicular lymphoma grade 1-3a) and 6 of these pts survived long-term. In contrast, of 23 pts (77%) relapsing with aggressive DLBCL or unknown histology 18 pts died due to lymphoma or related therapy. The majority of relapses occurred during the first 3 years after randomization (median time: 22 months) while after 5 years we detected relapses only in 5 pts (3% of all 190 pts prior CR). 11% of pts were initially progressive (28 pts) among whom 71% (20 pts) died rapidly due to lymphoma. Interestingly, the remaining 29% (8 pts) showed a long-term survival after salvage therapy (+/- ASCT); only 1 pt received allogeneic transplantation. The frequency of secondary malignancies was very similar in both treatment arms (9% vs. 8%) despite the very high dose of etoposide (total 4g/m2)in the R-MegaCHOEP arm. We observed 2 cases of AML and 1 case of MDS per arm. In total 70 pts (28%) have died: 30 pts due to lymphoma (12%), 22 pts therapy-related (11 pts due to salvage therapy) (9%), 8 pts of secondary neoplasia (3%), 5 pts due to concomitant disease (2%) and 5 pts for unknown reasons. Conclusions: This 10-year long-term follow-up of the R-MegaCHOEP trial confirms the very encouraging outcome of young high-risk pts following conventional chemotherapy with R-CHOEP. High-dose therapy did not improve outcome in any subgroup analysis including molecular high-risk groups. Relapse rate was generally low. Pts with aggressive relapse showed a very poor long-term outcome while pts with indolent histology at relapse survived long-term. Secondary malignancies occurred; however, they were rare with no excess leukemias/MDS following treatment with very high doses of etoposide and other cytotoxic agents. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Figure Disclosures Nickelsen: Roche Pharma AG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Roche: Honoraria. Truemper:Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Held:Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Dreyling:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: scientific advisory board; Sandoz: Other: scientific advisory board; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Other: scientific advisory board. Viardot:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenwald:MorphoSys: Consultancy. Lenz:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Employment, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Schmitz:Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Equity Ownership; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

ABVD Versus Escalated Beacopp in Advanced Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Results from a Retrospective, Multicenter European Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128198 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1565-1565 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Patrizia Mondello ◽

Irene Dogliotti ◽

Jan-Paul Bohn ◽

Federica Cavallo ◽

Simone Ferrero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

High Risk Patients ◽

Risk Patients

Purpose: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable disease even in advanced-stage, with >90% of long-term survivors. Currently, the standard of care is ABVD (doxorubicin, etoposide, vinblastine and dacarbazine), as it is less toxic and as effective as other more intensive chemotherapy regimens. Alternatively, BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone) has been proposed as front-line intensified regimen with a better initial disease control and prolonged time to relapse when compared to ABVD. However, this advantage is associated with higher rates of severe hematologic toxicity, treatment-related deaths, secondary neoplasms and infertility. To date, the debate regarding which regimen should be preferred as first line for advanced-stage HL is still ongoing. To shed some light on this open question we compared efficacy and safety of both regimens in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: From October 2009 to October 2018, patients with HL stage III-IV treated with either ABVD or BEACOPP escalated (BEACOPPesc) were retrospectively assessed in 7 European cancer centers. Results: A total of 372 consecutive patients were included in the study. One-hundred and ten patients were treated with BEACOPPesc and 262 with ABVD. The baseline characteristics of the two groups did not differ significantly, except for a higher rate of high-risk patients in the BEACOPPesc group in contrast to the ABVD one (47% vs 18%; p= 0.003). Complete response rate (CR) assessed by PET imaging at the end of the second cycle was 67% and 78% for the ABVD and BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.003), respectively. Thirteen patients of the ABVD group achieved stable disease (SD) and 6 had a progression disease (PD). On the other hand, 4 of the patients in the BEACOPPesc group progressed, another 2 interrupted therapy because life-threatening toxicity. At the end of the therapy, CR was 76% in the ABVD group and 85% in the BEACOPPesc group (p= 0.01). A total of 20% patients in the ABVD group and 14% patients in the BEACOPPesc group received consolidation radiotherapy on the mediastinal mass at the dose of 30Gy. After radiotherapy, the number of patients with CR increased to 79% and 87% in the two groups (p= 0.041), respectively. Thirty-nine patients (35%) in the BEACOPPesc group required dose reduction of chemotherapy due to toxicity compared to 12 patients (5%; p= <0.001) in the ABVD group. Overall, the rate of severe toxicities was higher in the BEACOPPesc group in comparison with the ABVD cohort. In particular, there was a significant increased frequency of acute grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events (neutropenia 61% vs 24%; anemia 29% vs 4%; thrombocytopenia 29% vs 3%), febrile neutropenia (29% vs 3%), severe infections (18% vs 3%). Myeloid growth factors were administered to 85% and 59% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD group. Blood transfusions were required in 51% and 6% of patients in the BEACOPPesc group compared to the ABVD cohort. Progression during or shortly after treatment occurred in 5 patients in the BEACOPPesc group (4%) and in 16 patients in the ABVD group (6%; p= 0.62). Among the 96 patients who achieved a CR after BEACOPPesc and radiotherapy, 8 relapsed (8%), compared to 29 of 208 patients in the ABVD group (14%; p= 0.04). At a median follow-up period of 5 years, no statistical difference in progression free survival (PFS; p=0.11) and event-free survival (EFS; p=0.22) was observed between the BEACOPPesc and ABVD cohorts. Similarly, overall survival (OS) did not differ between the two groups (p=0.14). The baseline international prognostic score (IPS <3 vs ≥ 3) significantly influenced the EFS with an advantage for the high-risk group treated with BEACOPPesc (Figure 1A; p=0.03), but not the PFS (Figure 1B; p=0.06) and OS (Figure 1C; p=0.14). During the follow-up period, in the BEACOPPesc group one patient developed myelodysplasia and one acute leukemia. Second solid tumors developed in one patient in the ABVD group (lung cancer) and one in BEACOPPesc group (breast cancer). Conclusion: We confirm that the ABVD regimen is an effective and less toxic therapeutic option for advanced-stage HL. Although BEACOPP results in better initial tumor control especially in high-risk patients, the long-term outcome remains similar between the two regimens. Disclosures Ferrero: EUSA Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Martinelli:BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Willenbacher:European Commission: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Myelom- und Lymphomselbsthilfe Österreich: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Science: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IQVIA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; oncotyrol: Employment, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Fujimoto: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tirol Program: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy Data for Combined Checkpoint Inhibition with Ipilimumab (Ipi) and Nivolumab (Nivo) As Consolidation Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) for High-Risk Hematological Malignancies — CPIT-001 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113586 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 256-256 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Alan P Skarbnik ◽

Michele L. Donato ◽

Robert Korngold ◽

Rena Feinman ◽

Scott D. Rowley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Patient Population ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematological Malignancies ◽

Checkpoint Inhibition ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Safety And Efficacy

Abstract Rationale: ASCT remains a standard-of-care as consolidation or salvage for multiple myeloma (MM), post-salvage consolidation for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) and upfront consolidation or salvage for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas (PTCL) Pts with high-risk disease still show poor outcome and frequent progression within the first 18 months. Maintenance strategies post ASCT, particularly in lymphomas, have failed to show benefit, underlining the need for novel approaches to help disease control following ASCT. We have previously reported on the preliminary safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor consolidation with Ipi and Nivo following ASCT trying to take advantage of the immunological milieu during post-ASCT recovery (Skarbnik et al., ASH 2017). Here we present updated data from our Phase I CPIT-001 trial. Methods: Pts with high-risk DLBCL, PTCL or MM (as defined in Table 1, divided in cohorts) were eligible if they experienced at least stable disease after most recent salvage therapy (NHL, PTCL or relapsed MM) or after induction therapy for high-risk MM. Pts were enrolled prior to ASCT, starting in July 2016. All pts with DLBCL/PTCL received BEAM (carmustine 300 mg/m2 day -6, etoposide 200 mg/m2 and cytarabine 200 mg/m2 days -5 to -2, melphalan 140 mg/m2 day -1) as conditioning regimen for ASCT, all pts with MM received melphalan 200 mg/m2 on day -1 For pts who achieved appropriate hematologic recovery (ANC >800/mm3 and platelets > 20,000/mm3), Ipi/Nivo were started between days 14 and 28 post ASCT. The infusion schedule was: Ipi: 1 mg/kg; 6 doses Weeks 1, 4, 7, 10, 16, 22Nivo: 3 mg/kg; 12 doses Weeks 1, 4, 7, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26 Primary objectives were: Safety profile evaluation; PFS and OS at 18 months (PFS18 and OS18). Cox proportional hazards regression was utilized to determine predictors of outcome. Results: 31 pts received at least one dose of Ipi/Nivo following ASCT and were included in the intent-to-treat population. Median follow up for the whole cohort is 16 months. As of February 2018, the FDA has halted all studies including checkpoint inhibitors for pts with MM. At that time, only one pt with MM was actively receiving Ipi/Nivo, which was then discontinued. At 18 months post ASCT, estimated PFS for the entire cohort was 67% and OS was 84% (Figures 1 and 2). Disease-specific PFS18 and OS18 are described in Table 2. At study entry, 48% of pts were in CR (NHLs) or stringent CR (sCR, MMs). At most recent follow-up (range 2-25 months) 71% of pts were in CR (NHL) or sCR (MM). Disease status at study entry (i.e. CR vs <CR) didn't correlate with PFS nor OS. 65% of pts developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) grade 2 or higher, requiring treatment with systemic steroids. Most common irAEs of any grade were: colitis (58%), rash (48%), thrombocytopenia (45%), anemia (45%) and transaminitis (32%). One pt (3%) died from complications of pneumonitis related to study drugs. All other irAEs resolved. Median time from 1st Ipi/Nivo to development of irAEs was 4 weeks. Median time to improvement to Grade 1 or baseline was 1 week after high-dose steroids were initiated. Treatment-related AEs of any grade that led to discontinuation of Ipi/Nivo occurred in 6 pts (19%). Development of irAEs, use of steroids or length of steroid-exposure did not correlate with PFS or OS. Conclusion: At 18 months post-ASCT, PFS for pts with high-risk hematological malignancies is 67%. This number underscores the potential for longer remissions by associating checkpoint inhibition with ASCT. For patients in the transplant-naïve MM with high-risk cytogenetics cohort, the 71% PFS18 (fig 3) is particularly striking, when compared to median PFS of 13-15 months in previous reports of ASCT alone in this patient population (Sonneveld et al, Blood 2016). In addition, the primary-refractory DLBCL population (43% of which were not in CR at time of ASCT) presented with a PFS18 of 83% (fig 4), while the reported PFS18 for this patient population with ASCT alone is 50% (Crump et al, Blood 2017). The cohort of pts with DLBCL relapsed within 1 year of induction had the poorest outcomes, possibly related to these pts being the most heavily pretreated in the whole cohort (median of 3 prior lines of therapy), with 57% of pts in this cohort refractory to most recent line of therapy. The manageable toxicity profile, coupled with the encouraging efficacy outcomes warrant further evaluation of this approach in a Phase II trial, which is currently planned. Disclosures Skarbnik: Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Munshi:Kite: Speakers Bureau. Siegel:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Feldman:Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; KITE: Speakers Bureau; Portola: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Biran:BMS: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding. Atkins:BMS: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Could Chronic Gvhd Overcome the Poor Prognosis of Patients with MDS and TP53 Undergoing Allogeneic HSCT?

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2890.2890 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2890-2890

Author(s):

Juan Carlos Caballero ◽

Mercedes Sánchez-Barba ◽

Mónica Del Rey ◽

Kamila Janusz ◽

Eva Lumbreras ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Somatic Mutations ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Poor Outcome

Abstract Background and Aim Although new agents have been approved for the treatment of MDS, the only curative approach for these patients is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Nevertheless, in these patients this approach has only obtained 40-60% of overall survival. Somatic mutations in MDS have recently been analyzed in order to confirm clonally and also prognostic impact in MDS patients. In this regard, TP 53 mutated gene is present in MDS in less than 10% of patients and is associated with advanced disease and high-risk features. Recent studies confirms poor outcomes in patients with TP 53 mutated receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation1,2. The present study try to analyze if the development of chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) could modify, due to graft versus leukemia effect, the adverse prognosis of these high-risk patients (TP53 mutated patients). Design and Methods <>Results of HSCT in 92 MDS patients from 5 centers in Spain were retrospectively studied. Samples were collected 1 month prior to transplant. 280ng of the genomic DNA from BM cells was screened for somatic mutations in TP53 gene. The study was done by NGS on a GS Junior Instrument (Roche) according to an amplicon sequencing design. For each sample, eight exons (4-11) were amplified with preconfigured primer plates provided within the IRON II study network. Data analysis, were carried out using the Sequence Pilot software version 3.5.2 (JSI Medical Systems) and GS Amplicon Variant Analyzer software, versions 2.7 and 2.9 (Roche Applied Science). Minimum coverage of sequenced exons was 100 reads and the sensitivity of variant detection was set to a lower limit of >2% for bidirectional reads. Only those variants that resulted in amino acid change in the protein sequence were considered. OS and RFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used for comparisons. All calculations were done using SPSS 18.0. Cumulative incidence of relapse was also calculated by xlstat version 2014 program. <>Results Median age was 54 years (17-69), 71.7% were "de novo" MDS and regarding IPSS, 53% were in the int-2/high-risk category. Other characteristics were in Table 1. In the pre-transplant evaluation, 15 patients out of 92 (16,3%) were TP 53 mutated. The mutations were located in exons 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10. These variations were present in a variable percentageof the cell population (3 to 84%). All mutations were specific nucleotide changes except for two cases. At the time of the last update, 16 patients had relapsed (17.4%) and 40 had died (43.5%). After a median follow up of 15.5 months, OS was 56.5%. Median OS for patients with mutated TP53 trend a toward to be shorter than survival for patients without mutated TP53 (median of 7 mo vs median not reached, respectively, p=0.156). Multivariate analysis for OS confirmed complex karyotype (HR 5,588, 95CI 1,794-17,407, p=0.003) and no developement of cGVHD (HR 3,531, 95IC 1,634-7,632, p=0.001) as predictors for poor outcome. Cumulative incidence of relapse was 20.3% (+/-4.3%) at 1 years. Mutational status of TP53 significantly influenced on relapse (53.3% +/-12.9% vs 13.7% +/-4% at 1 year for patients with vs without TP 53 mutation (Gray test=0.001, Figure 2). Regarding Relapse Free Survival (RFS), after a median of follow up of 17 months, RFS was 67.9% and as previously suggested, the presence of TP 53 mutation had an impact on RFS (41.7% for mutated (median RFS of 6 months) and 75% for non mutated patients (median RFS not reached), p=0.009). Multivariate analysis for RFS confirmed age (HR 1.054, 95CI 1.005-1.106, p=0.032) and TP 53 mutated (HR 3.054, 95IC 1.145-8.149, p=0.026) as predictors for lower RFS. Regarding 15 patients with mutated TP 53, 7 did relapsed and 9 had died. Developement of cGVHD showed a trend toward to improve outcome among TP 53 mutated patients, with a better OS and RFS for those developing cGVHD as compared to those who did not (OS of 55% vs 17% for patients with and without cGVHD, p=0.039, Figure 2 and RFS of 71% vs 50%, respectively, p=0.3). <>Conclusions Mutated TP53 pre-allo patients presents poor outcome as compared to not mutated, as previously described Bejar1 and Kim2. Nevertheless, the developement of cGVHD could overcome the adverse impact of this factor due to the developement of graft versus tumor efect, improving survival curves (OS and RFS) as compared to previous published results. Study supported by GRS-1033/A/14 P53. 1.-BŽjar, JCO 2014, 32(25). 2.-Kim, BBMT 2015, Epub ahead of print. Figure 2. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 3. Disclosures Sanz: JANSSEN CILAG: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Valcarcel:AMGEN: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Díez-Campelo:CELGENE: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN: Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Sustained Overall Survival Benefit with Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone Versus No Treatment in Patients with Smoldering Myeloma at High Risk of Progression to Myeloma: Long Term Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3308.3308 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3308-3308 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽

Miguel-T Hernandez ◽

Pilar Giraldo ◽

Javier De La Rubia ◽

Felipe De Arriba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

High Risk ◽

Confidence Interval ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Early Treatment ◽

Survival Benefit ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: For patients with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), the standard of care is observation. However, high-risk patients may benefit from early intervention. Methods: In this phase 3 trial, 119 patients with high-risk SMM were randomized to treatment or observation. The high risk populationwas defined by the presence of both PC_ 10% and MC_ 3g/dl or ifonly one criterion was present, patients must have a proportionof aPC within the total PCBM compartment by immunophenotypingof 95% plus immunoparesis. Patients in the treatment group received nine 4-week induction cycles (lenalidomide at a dose of 25 mg per day on days 1 to 21, plus dexamethasone at a dose of 20 mg per day on days 1 to 4 and days 12 to 15), followed by maintenance (lenalidomide at a dose of 10 mg per day on days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle) up to 2 years. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP) to myeloma. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), response rate and safety. Results: After a median follow-up of 75 months (range: 57-100), there was a 57% reduction in the risk of death for the early treatment with lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus not treatment (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.9; P=0.02). Median overall survival has not been reached in either group, but 86% and 62% of patients are alive at 6 years in the early treatment and observation arms, respectively (Figure 1). The benefit in TTP is also highly sustained (hazard ratio: 0.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.41; P<0.0001). Progression to MM occurred in 53 out of the 62 patients (86%) in the abstention arm while only 22 out of 57 patients (38%) in the len-dex arm. At the time of progression patients received optimized treatments: bortezomib-based combinations were administered to thirteen out of 22 patients (59%) in the len-dex arm and to 23 out of 53 patients (43%) in the observation arm; lenalidomide-based combinations to 3 out of 22 patients (14%) in the experimental and to 8 out of 53 patients (15%) in the control arm; two out of 22 patients in the len-dex arm (9%) received bortezomib plus immunomodulatory agents whilst 16 out of 53 patients (30%) in the observation group received this combination; four out of 22 patients (18%) and six out of 53 patients (11%) in the len-dex and observation groups, respectively, were treated with chemotherapy; four patients (18%) in the experimental arm and 15 (28%) in the observation groups received an ASCT. Most patients responded to rescue therapies in both arms, resulting in overall response rates of 78% (17/22) and 86% (45/53) in the experimental and control arm, respectively. We compared survival from start of subsequent therapy in the patients population who progressed to active disease; the outcome was similar in both arms: at 6 years, 62% (16/22) of the patients in the len-dex arm remain alive and 49% (31/53) in the observation arm (P=0.50; Fig. 2C). The survival benefit observed was independent of the classification model used for defining high risk SMM ( Mayo Clinic and Spanish model) Conclusion: This long term follow-up analysis confirms that early treatment with lenalidomide-dexamethasone for high-risk SMM translates into a significant benefit in TTP but also in a sustained significant prolongation of the OS. The early exposure to lenalidomide-dexamethasone does not induce more resistant relapses. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Mateos: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. De La Rubia:Amgen, Bristol Myers, Celgene, Janssen: Consultancy. Paiva:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; EngMab: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Binding Site: Research Funding. Oriol:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Overview of Primary and Secondary Myelofibrosis in Young Adults: Genomic Characteristics, Treatment Strategies and Outcomes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123536 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4177-4177

Author(s):

Andrew T Kuykendall ◽

Chetasi Talati ◽

Kendra L. Sweet ◽

Eric Padron ◽

David A Sallman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Strategies ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment History ◽

Secondary Myelofibrosis

Introduction: Primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF) [i.e. occurring after a prior diagnosis of polycythemia vera [PV] or essential thrombocythemia (ET)] are myeloid malignancies often diagnosed in the 6th and 7th decade of life. In the rare occurrence that younger patients receive this diagnosis, prognostic recommendations are poorly extrapolated and optimal treatment strategies are unclear. Prior studies assessing young MF patients have suggested a more indolent course for this cohort. Here we aim to analyze our experience with young MF patients in terms of genetic makeup, treatment history, and outcomes. Methods: We assessed a database of primary and secondary MF patients who presented to our center between 1/2000 and 6/2019. We identified patients who were 50 years or younger at the time of MF diagnosis. Clinical and genetic features along with treatment history and outcomes were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Patients surviving at 240 months after diagnosis were censored at that time. Results: Among 599 MF patients, 63 (11%) were ≤50 at the time of diagnosis. Median age at diagnosis was 43.6 years (yr). Median time from diagnosis to first presentation to our institution was 4.2 months (mo) (range 0-35 yr). Thirty-eight (60%) and 44 (70%) were seen within 1 and 5 years of diagnosis, respectively. Females accounted for 62% (n = 39) of patients. Forty-five (71%) patients had primary MF, 4 (6%) had post-PV MF and 13 (21%) post-ET MF. Median follow-up for the cohort was 94.9 mo. Among 62 patients in whom IPSS at diagnosis could be calculated, 20 (32%) were low, 27 (44%) intermediate-1, 12 (19%) intermediate-2, and 3 (5%) high-risk. JAK2 mutation was detected in 22/60 (37%), CALR in 21/44 (48%), MPL in 0/49 (0%). One patient was triple-negative. Extended targeted gene sequencing was performed in 42/63 patients during their clinical course. Sequencing occurred at a median time of 2.6 yr after diagnosis (range 0-35 yr). Genes most commonly mutated were ASXL1 (12%), TET2 (12%), EZH2 (10%), and DNMT3A (10%). No mutations involving SRSF2, U2AF1, ZRSR2, or SF3B1 were seen. Thirteen patients did not receive active treatment during follow-up. Among those receiving treatment, median time to first treatment was 9.4 mo (range 0-331 mo). The most common initial treatments were erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) (14%), hydroxyurea (28%), and ruxolitinib (22%). In total, 29 (46%) received ruxolitinib with median time to ruxolitinib treatment of 27.2 mo. Median duration of ruxolitinib treatment was 44.5 mo. Fourteen patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHCT) at a median of 57.4 mo after diagnosis (range 6-123 mo). Transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) occurred in 5 patients at a median time of 99 mo (range 51-178 mo) after diagnosis. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Five and 10-year OS estimated at 93% and 77%, respectively. No difference was seen in OS for patients with primary and secondary MF (p = 0.40). Conclusions: Primary and secondary MF are rarely diagnosed in patients ≤ 50 years old. In this cohort, patients are often CALR mutant, have lower-risk disease, and lack splicing mutations. Initial treatment strategies are varied, but favor cytoreductive approaches. The prognosis in these patients is favorable, but high-risk mutations can occur and progression to AML occurs in a minority of patients. AHCT remains a curative option; however, optimal timing for transplant is not clear. Figure Disclosures Kuykendall: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Talati:Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria. Sweet:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Stemline: Consultancy. Sallman:Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. List:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lancet:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services ; Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Komrokji:JAZZ: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; DSI: Consultancy; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Outcome of Children with Acute Leukemia (AL) Given Alphabeta T and B-Cell Depleted HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (TBdepl-haploHSCT)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128416 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 799-799

Author(s):

Pietro Merli ◽

Daria Pagliara ◽

Mattia Algeri ◽

Federica Galaverna ◽

Giuseppina Li Pira ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Disease Status ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Low Incidence ◽

Patient’S Outcome

Background: TBdepl-haploHSCT is a suitable option for children with AL in need of an allograft, lacking an HLA-compatible donor. We previously published promising results in a cohort of 80 children with AL, given this type of allograft (Locatelli et al., Blood 2017), demonstrating a low incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and low non-relapse mortality (NRM), translating into a final outcome comparable to that of patients transplanted from an HLA-compatible donor. We present the long-term follow-up analysis of this study (NCT01810120), now including 134 patients, with a minimum observation time of 100 days after the allograft. Patients and methods: Between October 2010 and April 2019, 134 children with AL in morphological complete remission (CR) received TBdepl-haploHSCT from an HLA-partially matched relative (a parent in 97% of cases) at Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù in Rome, Italy. All patients were prepared to the allograft using a fully-myeloablative conditioning regimen including a combination of cytotoxic drugs and/or total body irradiation (TBI). Anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) was used before transplantation (12 mg/kg total dose, from days -5 to day -3) to modulate bi-directional donor/recipient alloreactivity. Rituximab (200 mg/sqm) was administered on day -1 to prevent post-transplantation EBV-induced lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD). No patient received any post-transplant GvHD prophylaxis. Results: Characteristics of patients enrolled in the study are shown in Table 1. Median follow-up of surviving patients is 60 months (range: 3 months - 8.7 years). Only 3 patients did not achieve engraftment (all affected by acute myeloid leukemia and who did not receive TBI during conditioning regimen); median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery was 13 (range 9-22) and 11 (range 8-23) days, respectively. Cumulative incidence of grade II-III acute GvHD was 16.5% (95% CI 9.9-22.6). One patient developed gut GvHD, while for all other patients skin was the sole organ involved; no case of grade IV GvHD was recorded. Eight out of the 123 patients at risk developed chronic GvHD, in all cases of limited severity, the cumulative incidence of this complication being 7.6% (95% CI 2.3-12.6). Six patients died for transplant-related complications (2 because of idiopathic pneumonitis and 1 each of disseminated adenovirus infection, cardiac insufficiency, combined CMV/rhinovirus pneumonia and sepsis from Pseudomonas aeruginosa), the 5-year cumulative incidence of NRM being 4.5% (95% CI, 1.8-9.0). Since 25 patients relapsed at a median time of 173 days (range 59-1012) after HSCT, the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse is 21.1% (95% CI, 14.2-29.1). The 5-year probability of overall and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 74.6 (95% CI 65.1 -71.9) and 74.4% (95% CI 65.4-81.4) (Figure 1A), respectively. Use of TBI during the preparative regimen, age at transplant above the median value (Figure 1B) and disease status at transplantation (CR1 and CR2, Figure 1C) were associated with better patient's outcome, because of a reduced incidence of relapse (Figure 1D for TBI). All these 3 factors remained statistically significant in multivariable analysis for LFS: hazard ratio (HR) for TBI was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.06- 0.37, p<0.001, HR for age at HSCT was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.11-0.65, p=0.003), while that for disease status was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.26-0.91, p=0.02), respectively. The 5-year GvHD/relapse-free survival was 69.9% (95% CI 60.8-77.3). The median CD3+ cell count on day +30, +90, +180 and +360 were 187, 215, 660 and 1260/mcl, respectively. Conclusions: These data confirm in a larger population and with a longer follow-up that TBdepl-haploHSCT is a safe and effective transplant option, being associated with a low risk of both NRM and acute/chronic GvHD, resulting into a 5-year LFS comparable or even better with that reported in studies using either an HLA-identical sibling or an unrelated volunteer as donor. In particular, the low incidence of chronic GvHD preserves a good quality of life in patients with long life-expectancy. Leukemia recurrence represents the main cause of treatment failure and strategies based either on the use of a titrated number of donor T cells transduced with a safety switch or ex-vivo depleted of the alloreactive component could further improve patient's outcome. Figure 1 Disclosures Merli: Novartis: Honoraria; Sobi: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Bellicum: Consultancy. Algeri:Miltenyi: Honoraria; Atara Biotherapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria. Locatelli:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Tandem Autologous-Autologous Vs. Autologous-Allogeneic Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Pooled Analysis of 1,338 Patients from Four Trials with Long-Term Follow up

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-121367 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 259-259 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Luciano J. Costa ◽

Simona Iacobelli ◽

Marcelo C. Pasquini ◽

Riddhi Modi ◽

Luisa Giaccone ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Long Term Follow Up ◽

Risk Of Relapse

Introduction: Tandem autologous transplant (auto- auto) has been studied as a method to increase remission rates and reduce relapse in the upfront therapy of MM. The use of autologous followed by reduced intensity conditioning allogenic transplantation (auto-allo) offers the potential of long-term graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect, but with the risk of graft versus host disease and potentially higher non-relapse mortality (NRM). Trials comparing these two strategies relied on availability of HLA-matched sibling donors for arm allocation (biological "randomization") and have yielded conflicting results, in part due to trial size or limited follow up. A pooled analysis of multiple trials with extended follow up provides the best opportunity to compare these two transplant strategies. Methods: We obtained individual patient data from participants of 4 trials comparing auto-auto vs. auto-allo after brief induction therapy, namely BMT CTN 0102 (N=709), NMAM2000 (N=357), PETHEMA/GEM2000 (N=110), and the Torino consortium trial (N=162). In all 4 trials arm allocation was by biological "randomization". Patients were designated high risk if beta-2 microglobulin ≥ 4.0 mg/L at diagnosis or presence of deletion of chromosome 13 by metaphase karyotyping. Time to event outcomes were analyzed by intention to treat, from the time of first autologous transplant. Main outcomes analyzed were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes analyzed were NRM and risk of relapse, treated as competing risks, and post relapse survival. Results: There were 1,338 patients included in the analysis, 899 in auto-auto and 439 in auto-allo. Median follow up of survivors is 118.5 months. Characteristics of the two arms are displayed in Table 1. Median OS was 78.0 months in auto-auto and 98.3 months in auto-allo (HR= 0.85, P=0.003, Figure 1). OS was 59.8 % vs. 62.3% at 5-years (P=0.37) and 36.4% vs. 44.1% at 10 years (P=0.01) for auto-auto and auto-allo respectively. PFS was also improved in auto-allo (HR= 0.84, P=0.004) with 5-year PFS of 23.4 vs. 30.1% (P=0.01) and 10-year PFS of 14.4% vs. 18.7% (P=0.06). For the 214 high risk patients (125 auto-auto, 89 auto-allo) there was superior 5-year and 10-year PFS with auto-allo, but no difference in OS. Risk of NRM was higher in auto-allo (10 year 8.3% vs. 19.7%, P<0.001), while risk of disease progression was higher in auto-auto (10 year 77.2% vs. 61.6%, P<0.001). There were 685 progressions in auto-auto and 266 in auto-allo. Median post relapse overall survival was 41.5 months in auto-auto and 62.3 months in auto-allo (HR= 0.71, P<0.001, Figure 2). Five years post relapse, 37.0% of patients were alive in auto-auto vs. 51.1% in auto-allo (P<0.001). Conclusion: Long-term follow up using a large pooled dataset of 4 trials indicates durable, long-term disease control with an auto-allo strategy. Despite higher NRM, there was a reduction in the risk of relapse and superior post relapse survival in auto-allo. This supports the hypothesis of a durable GVM effect enhancing myeloma control with subsequent therapies. Disclosures Costa: Janssen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Fujimoto Pharmaceutical Corporation Japan: Other: Advisor; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Pasquini:Pfizer: Consultancy; Medigene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Bladé:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Irctures: Honoraria. Schonland:Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Prothena: Honoraria; Medac: Other: Travel grant; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hari:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Vault: Equity Ownership; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Giralt:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Actinium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Patriarca:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stadtmauer:Abbvie: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tmunity: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Krishnan:Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, BMS: Consultancy; Sutro BioPharma, zPredicta: Consultancy; Amgen, Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene, Z Predicta: Other: Stock Ownership; Takeda: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib, Dexamethasone and Rituximab in Newly Diagnosed Patients with WaldenströM's Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis of a Phase 2 Study after a Minimum Follow up of 6 Years

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2957.2957 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2957-2957 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽

Ramon Garcia-Sanz ◽

Efstathios Kastritis ◽

Pierre Morel ◽

Marie-Christine Kyrtsonis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Death Rate ◽

Research Funding ◽

Primary Therapy ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare low grade lymphoma, with a prolonged course. With a median survival exceeding 7 years, prolonged follow up is needed in order to evaluate the outcomes of patients with WM after a specific primary therapy. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, remain cornerstones of WM therapy, usually in combination with alkylating agents. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor which has shown activity in myeloma but also has shown significant activity, especially in terms of rapid IgM reduction, in patients with relapsed/refractory or treatment naïve WM. Clinical and preclinical data have indicated potential synergistic activity for the combination of bortezomib and rituximab. Thus, in a large phase 2 trial we evaluated the activity of the chemotherapy free combination of bortezomib with dexamethasone and rituximab (BDR) in 59 newly diagnosed patients with WM fulfilling the contemporary criteria for diagnosis and treatment initiation. Here we present the results from the long term follow up of this study, focusing on long term outcomes and long term toxicity, after a minimum follow up of 6 years. A total of 5 cycles of therapy with BDR were planned. In order to manage complications that are associated with high IgM levels, reduce the need for plasmapheresis and the risk and severity of rituximab-associated "IgM flare", single-agent intravenous (iv) bortezomib at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 was administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of the first 21-day cycle. On cycles 2 to 5, bortezomib was administered IV weekly at a dose of 1.6 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in four 35-day consecutive cycles. On cycles 2 and 5, IV dexamethasone 40 mg and IV rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m2 were given on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (total of 8 infusions of rituximab). Fifty-nine patients were treated with BDR from March 2007 until June 2010. The characteristics of the patients, response rates and toxicity have been published previously (Dimopoulos MA, et al Blood. 2013 Nov 7;122(19):3276-82). Briefly, most patients had advanced age (61% were >65 years) and advanced disease with adverse prognostic factors such as, anemia (hemoglobin <11.5 g/dL in 82%) and elevated β2-microglobulin (≥3 mg/dL in 64%), so that 45.5% and 40% were rated as high and intermediate risk per the International Prognostic Scoring System for WM. On intent to treat, 85% of the patients responded [3% complete response (CR), 7% very good partial response (VGPR), 58% partial response (PR), 17% minor response (MR)] for a major response rate (≥PR) of 68%. Median follow up is86 months (range 0.6- 112). At 7 years 40 patients (68%) had disease progression or died due to WM, while 9 patients (15%) died due to unrelated causes without progression. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 43 months (95% CI 23-63) and 10 patients (17%) still remain in remission after a median of 90 months (range 73.5-112). As per ISSWM stage PFS at 7-years was 62.5%, 42% and 15% for patients with low, intermediate and high risk disease respectively. Median duration of response for patients who achieved at least PR was 64.5 months. Among the 40 (68%) patients with disease progression or relapse, 21 (35.5%) received second line treatment. Up to the date of data cutoff (June 2016), 20 patients (34%) have died and accounting for WM-unrelated death as a competing event, WM-related death rate at 7 years was 18.5% and unrelated death rate was 15.5%. Overall survival (OS) rate at 7-years was 66% and OS rate was 87.5% for low, 68.2% for intermediate and 48% for high risk patients per ISSWM. No patient has developed secondary MDS and transformation to DLBCL occurred in 2 (3.3%) patients, who had received chemo-immunotherapy after BDR. In conclusion, BDR is a very active regimen, well tolerated and, importantly, with favorable long term toxicity profile. Primary therapy with this chemotherapy- free regimen, which was completed in 23 weeks, induced durable responses in newly diagnosed symptomatic WM patients with approximately 17% of patients still remaining in response after 7 years. Our data support the use of BDR as one of the recommended regimens for the treatment of this disease WM. Disclosures Kastritis: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kyrtsonis:Genesis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Leleu:Novartis: Honoraria; LeoPharma: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; TEVA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Palladini:Prothena: Honoraria. Merlini:Takeda and Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Incorporation of Thiotepa in a Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen Leads to Improved Engraftment after Stem Cell Transplant for Patients with Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-132120 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3273-3273

Author(s):

Swati Naik ◽

Olive S. Eckstein ◽

Ghadir Sasa ◽

Robert A. Krance ◽

Carl E. Allen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Graft Failure ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Donor Chimerism ◽

Equity Ownership

Introduction: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) following myeloablative conditioning regimens (MAC) is associated with high rates of non-relapse mortality. A previously reported prospective, phase 2 multi-center trial (RICHI) using using RIC strategy of fludarabine, melphalan and alemtuzumab (day -14) for HLH and primary immune deficiency syndromes (PIDS) demonstrated improved mortality rates but fewer than half the patients with HLH (41%) successfully engrafted without secondary graft failure, need for donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) or second transplant. Incorporation of thiotepa during conditioning has been to shown to be safe and improve engraftment. We report the results of a retrospective analysis of nine consecutive patient treated with the inclusion of thiotepa into the RICHI backbone (RICHI+TT). Methods: Patients received a single additional dose of thiotepa 10mg/kg on day -3 added to the fludarabine/melphalan/alemtuzumab backbone (RICHI+TT) with the same graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis of methyprednisolone through day +28 and cyclosporine through day 180. To determine sustained engraftment, we used the same parameters the RICHI study defined as > 5 % donor chimerism without any intervention and alive at 1 year post-transplant. Results: Our cohort consisted of 8 males and 1 female with a median age of 7 years (range 1-18 years). Seven patients had HLH with proven pathogenic genetic mutations (biallelic PRF1 - 2, UNC13D - 2, STXBP1- 1, RAB27A-1, STAT3 gain of function-1), while the other 2 patients had HLH without identified pathogenic mutations (1- chronic active EBV, 1- juvenile idiopathic arthritis with refractory macrophage activation syndrome).The majority of patients received a bone marrow product (n = 8), one patient received a peripheral blood stem cell product; 6 patients received a graft from a matched related donor , two from a mismatched unrelated donor, and one from a matched unrelated donor. All patients engrafted at a median of 15 days post-transplant (8 patients at 100% donor chimera; 1 patient at 99% donor chimera at initial engraftment). Six of the 9 patients were evaluable to assess donor chimerism at 1 year as per study definitions with a median follow up of 875 days (range: 366 -1000 days). All 6 patients had > 5% donor chimerism and were alive at 1 year. Five of the 6 evaluable patients met criteria for sustained donor engraftment without need for intervention and all maintained 100% donor chimerism at last follow-up (Table 1). Only one of the six patients had evidence of falling donor chimerism; this stabilized at 40% donor chimerism after DLI. No patients had primary or secondary graft failure. Three patients were not evaluable for long-term assessment due to death prior to 1 year. Six of the 9 patients described here are alive and disease-free with stable long-term engraftment. The incorporation of Thiotepa to the RICHI backbone improved on previously reported sustained donor engraftment (Table 2). Conclusions: The RICHI+TT approach had better long-term donor engraftment with a decreased need for DLI or second transplant without increased rates of non-relapse mortality. Prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment strategies for patients with HLH who require HSCT for cure. Disclosures Heslop: Cell Medica: Research Funding; Tessa Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Marker Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Allovir: Equity Ownership; Gilead Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text