Long-Term Outcome of Children with Acute Leukemia (AL) Given Alphabeta T and B-Cell Depleted HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (TBdepl-haploHSCT)

Background: TBdepl-haploHSCT is a suitable option for children with AL in need of an allograft, lacking an HLA-compatible donor. We previously published promising results in a cohort of 80 children with AL, given this type of allograft (Locatelli et al., Blood 2017), demonstrating a low incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and low non-relapse mortality (NRM), translating into a final outcome comparable to that of patients transplanted from an HLA-compatible donor. We present the long-term follow-up analysis of this study (NCT01810120), now including 134 patients, with a minimum observation time of 100 days after the allograft. Patients and methods: Between October 2010 and April 2019, 134 children with AL in morphological complete remission (CR) received TBdepl-haploHSCT from an HLA-partially matched relative (a parent in 97% of cases) at Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù in Rome, Italy. All patients were prepared to the allograft using a fully-myeloablative conditioning regimen including a combination of cytotoxic drugs and/or total body irradiation (TBI). Anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) was used before transplantation (12 mg/kg total dose, from days -5 to day -3) to modulate bi-directional donor/recipient alloreactivity. Rituximab (200 mg/sqm) was administered on day -1 to prevent post-transplantation EBV-induced lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD). No patient received any post-transplant GvHD prophylaxis. Results: Characteristics of patients enrolled in the study are shown in Table 1. Median follow-up of surviving patients is 60 months (range: 3 months - 8.7 years). Only 3 patients did not achieve engraftment (all affected by acute myeloid leukemia and who did not receive TBI during conditioning regimen); median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery was 13 (range 9-22) and 11 (range 8-23) days, respectively. Cumulative incidence of grade II-III acute GvHD was 16.5% (95% CI 9.9-22.6). One patient developed gut GvHD, while for all other patients skin was the sole organ involved; no case of grade IV GvHD was recorded. Eight out of the 123 patients at risk developed chronic GvHD, in all cases of limited severity, the cumulative incidence of this complication being 7.6% (95% CI 2.3-12.6). Six patients died for transplant-related complications (2 because of idiopathic pneumonitis and 1 each of disseminated adenovirus infection, cardiac insufficiency, combined CMV/rhinovirus pneumonia and sepsis from Pseudomonas aeruginosa), the 5-year cumulative incidence of NRM being 4.5% (95% CI, 1.8-9.0). Since 25 patients relapsed at a median time of 173 days (range 59-1012) after HSCT, the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse is 21.1% (95% CI, 14.2-29.1). The 5-year probability of overall and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 74.6 (95% CI 65.1 -71.9) and 74.4% (95% CI 65.4-81.4) (Figure 1A), respectively. Use of TBI during the preparative regimen, age at transplant above the median value (Figure 1B) and disease status at transplantation (CR1 and CR2, Figure 1C) were associated with better patient's outcome, because of a reduced incidence of relapse (Figure 1D for TBI). All these 3 factors remained statistically significant in multivariable analysis for LFS: hazard ratio (HR) for TBI was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.06- 0.37, p<0.001, HR for age at HSCT was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.11-0.65, p=0.003), while that for disease status was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.26-0.91, p=0.02), respectively. The 5-year GvHD/relapse-free survival was 69.9% (95% CI 60.8-77.3). The median CD3+ cell count on day +30, +90, +180 and +360 were 187, 215, 660 and 1260/mcl, respectively. Conclusions: These data confirm in a larger population and with a longer follow-up that TBdepl-haploHSCT is a safe and effective transplant option, being associated with a low risk of both NRM and acute/chronic GvHD, resulting into a 5-year LFS comparable or even better with that reported in studies using either an HLA-identical sibling or an unrelated volunteer as donor. In particular, the low incidence of chronic GvHD preserves a good quality of life in patients with long life-expectancy. Leukemia recurrence represents the main cause of treatment failure and strategies based either on the use of a titrated number of donor T cells transduced with a safety switch or ex-vivo depleted of the alloreactive component could further improve patient's outcome. Figure 1 Disclosures Merli: Novartis: Honoraria; Sobi: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Bellicum: Consultancy. Algeri:Miltenyi: Honoraria; Atara Biotherapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria. Locatelli:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Impact of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease on Long-Term Outcomes of Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Adults with High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3980.3980 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3980-3980

Author(s):

Jae-Ho Yoon ◽

Sung-Soo Park ◽

Young-Woo Jeon ◽

Sung-Eun Lee ◽

Byung-Sik Cho ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background : The role of reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC-HCT) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains unclear because the interpretation of transplantation outcome is mainly limited by the small sample size, short follow-up duration, various regimens for conditioning and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and the heterogeneity of the criteria used to select patients for RIC-HCT. Previously, we conducted a phase 2 trial of RIC-HCT in adults with high-risk ALL who were ineligible for myeloablative conditioning and showed the potential role of this strategy, especially in patients in first complete remission (CR1). Here, we report the long-term outcomes of RIC-HCT by analyzing 122 consecutive adults with high-risk ALL in CR1, particularly focusing on the prognostic relevance of chronic GVHD. Methods: During the period between 2000 and 2014, 122 patients in CR1 (median age, 52 years [range, 15-65 years]; 54 Ph-negative ALL and 68 Ph-positive ALL) were given an identical RIC regimen consisting of fludarabine (150 mg/m2 in total) and melphalan (140 mg/m2in total). The indications for RIC-HCT were advanced age (≥50 years; n=79; 64.8%) and comorbid conditions (n=43; 35.2%). Graft sources were peripheral blood stem cells (n=118; 66 matched sibling donor, 23 matched unrelated donor, 29 mismatched unrelated donor) and bone marrow (n=4; 1 matched sibling donor, 1 matched unrelated donor, 2 mismatched unrelated donor). The median time to transplantation was 155.5 days (range, 103-291 days). GVHD prophylaxis was attempted by administering calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine for sibling donor transplants, tacrolimus for unrelated donor transplants) plus methotrexate. Antithymocyte globulin was administered to the patients who received mismatched unrelated donor grafts. If residual leukemia was detected in the absence of GVHD at 3 months after transplantation, calcineurin inhibitors were rapidly discontinued. Results: The median time for neutrophil and platelet recovery was 12 days (range, 8-30 days) and 13 days (range, 5-60 days) after RIC-HCT. Sixty-two patients developed acute GVHD (53 grade II, 5 grade III, 4 grade IV). The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 1 year was 50.8% (42.6% for Ph-negative and 57.4% for Ph-positive, P=0.152). Except for 11 patients with early deaths within 100 days, 77 developed chronic GVHD (30 mild, 29 moderate, 18 severe), resulting in a 5-year cumulative incidence of 63.6% (69.1% for Ph-negative ALL and 58.8% for Ph-positive ALL, P=0.319). The median time to onset of chronic GVHD was 140 days (range, 37-843 days) after transplantation. Cytomegalovirus reactivation >10,000 copies/mL was observed in 40.2% (44.4% for Ph-negative ALL and 36.8% for Ph-positive ALL, P=0.447). After a median follow-up duration of 57.9 months (range, 17.7-206.8 months), the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 27.5% (23.9% for Ph-negative ALL and 30.2% for Ph-positive ALL) and 19.0% (17.4% for Ph-negative ALL and 20.3% for Ph-positive ALL), respectively, and the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 53.5% (58.4% for Ph-negative ALL and 49.7% for Ph-positive ALL) and 59.8% (60.2% for Ph-negative ALL and 59.3% for Ph-positive ALL). In multivariate analysis, the presence of chronic GVHD lowered CIR (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10-0.48; P<0.001), but severe chronic GVHD increased NRM (HR, 8.76; 95% CI, 3.39-22.6; P<0.001). Thus, the presence of mild to moderate chronic GVHD was closely related to better outcomes in terms of DFS (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.32-0.64; P<0.001) and OS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.64; P<0.001) in all patients as well as in both subgroups of patients. In Ph-positive ALL subgroup of patients, patients without achievement of major molecular response until the time of transplantation had also significantly higher CIR (HR, 7.42; 95% CI, 3.04-18.10; P<0.001) and poorer DFS (HR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.48-8.14; P=0.004) and OS (HR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.03-6.47; P=0.043). Conclusion: Our long-term follow-up data with a uniform treatment strategy suggest that RIC-HCT is a valid alternative choice for providing a long-term disease control for adult high-risk ALL patients in CR1. Minimal residual disease-based treatment strategies to reduce leukemia cell burden before HCT and to enhance the graft-versus-leukemia effect are needed in the future. Disclosures Kim: ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lee:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

High Rate of Long Term Complete Remission for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Who Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and Receive Salvage with Donor Lymphocyte Infusions (DLI)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.5860.5860 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 5860-5860

Author(s):

Alan P Skarbnik ◽

Mary E DiLorenzo ◽

Tracy Andrews ◽

Phyllis McKiernan ◽

Scott D. Rowley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Disease Status ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the only curative option for CLL, in part due to allogeneic graft-vs-leukemia effect (GVL), which can lead to complete suppression of the CLL clone (Schetelig et al, JCO 2003). Management of post-SCT relapse remains challenging, and DLI has been successfully used as salvage, due to its potential to induce GVL (Delgado et al, Blood 2009). We evaluated outcomes of SCT for patients (pts) with a diagnosis of CLL transplanted at our center. Methods: 36 consecutive pts transplanted between 2004 and 2015 were reviewed. Kaplan Meier survival curves were produced to examine overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP) and post-DLI survival. Univariate Cox Proportionate hazard models were also estimated to assess the impact of pt characteristics on the risk of survival and progression. Bivariate frequencies with Fisher exact tests, correlation analysis, and independent samples t-tests were performed to test associations across outcomes. Results: Sample was 72% male. Median age at time of SCT was 57 yo (range 42-74). Pts had a median time of 70 months (mos) between diagnosis (Dx) of CLL and SCT. Median follow-up post-SCT was 32 mos (range 1-118). Of the 30 pts with known disease status at the time of SCT, 16.7% were in complete remission (CR), 20% had stable disease (SD), 50% were in partial remission (PR) and 13.3% had progressive disease (PD). Median number of lines of therapy pre-SCT was 3 (range 1-8). Thirteen pts (36%) were refractory to their first line of therapy. 10 pts (27.8%) had del(17p), 11 pts (30.6%) had del(11q) and 8 pts (22.2%) had complex cytogenetics. Most patients (72%) received pre-SCT conditioning with FCR (Khouri et al, Exp Hematol 2004). 16 pts (44.4%) received rATG as part of their conditioning regimen. Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of methotrexate and tacrolimus. 20 (55.6%) pts had acute GVHD and 19 (52.8%) had chronic GVHD. 5 (13.8%) pts had grade 3/4 acute GVHD and 1 (2.7%) had extensive chronic GVHD. When comparing pts who received SCT from unrelated donors (MUD, 24 pts) vs sibling donors (sib, 10 pts) there were no differences in rates of GVHD, disease progression or overall survival. Twenty-seven pts (75%) were in CR at first disease evaluation after SCT (CR conversion rate of 58.3%) and 2 pts (5.5%) had PD. On follow-up, another 15 pts (41.7%) presented PD. Median TTP was 14 months, with only 3 pts relapsing after 2 years from SCT. Eight pts who had PD and one patient who had a PR post-SCT received short-term anti-CLL therapy for disease debulking, followed by DLI. Six (66.6%) out of the 9 pts who received DLI achieved CR and are currently alive and in CR. Median follow-up post-DLI was 43 months and median duration of response to DLI was 47 mos (range 6-85 mos). Ultimately, 13 (36.1%) pts died, 8 (22.2%) were lost to follow-up, and 15 (41.7%) were alive at last contact. Disease progression was the most common cause of death (5 pts, 13.9%). Transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 13.9% (3 deaths due to infection, 2 deaths due to chronic GVHD). Only 2 deaths (5.5%) occurred during the first 100 days post-SCT, both due to infection. No deaths occurred due to acute GVHD. Median OS was 84 months. PFS (not accounting for pts who relapsed post-SCT but achieved CR with DLI) was 58% in the first year and 25% at five years. The median PFS was 19 months. Univariate and multivariate analysis of pre-SCT pt characteristics (age, time from Dx to SCT, number of therapies, stage, presence of adenopathy, MUD vs sib donor, cytogenetic abnormalities, ABO mismatch, disease status at SCT) did not show any statistically significant correlation with OS, PFS or GVHD rates. Conclusion: SCT remains the only curative option for CLL. Our experience shows that pts may achieve long-term survival with this approach. TRM was low (13.8%) and rates of acute and chronic GVHD were compatible with previous reports (Sorror et al, JCO 2005; Dreger et al, Blood 2010). Type of donor (MUD vs sib) did not impact outcomes, suggesting that patients without a matched sibling should not be denied transplantation if a MUD is available. Although 47% of the patients eventually progressed after transplantation, 66% of patients who received DLI for salvage were able to achieve CR and remain progression-free for a prolonged period of time, underlining the importance of the GVL effect. Most relapses occurred within the first 2 years post SCT and late relapses were rare. Figure 2 Figure 2. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures Skarbnik: Gilead Sciences: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Vesole:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Goy:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Writing support, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Infinity: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feldman:Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Leslie:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Leslie:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Is Associated with Prolonged Disease Control in Chemosensitive Aggressive Histology Lymphoma Patients When Done Early

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.4525.4525 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 4525-4525

Author(s):

Auro Viswabandya ◽

Tony Panzarella ◽

Dennis Dong Hwan Kim ◽

Vikas Gupta ◽

Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Aggressive Histology ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 4525 Introduction Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) is a treatment option in aggressive histology lymphoma (AG-NHL) patients who have either failed or relapsed after autologous SCT (ASCT) or if the potential for long term disease control after ASCT is limited. There is limited data in literature regarding the long term outcome of allo-SCT in AG-NHL. Methods We did a retrospective analysis of all aggressive histology patients who underwent Allo-SCT between 1989 and 2009 at our centre. A total of 41 patients with AG-NHL [diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and variants, follicular lymphoma grade 3 (FL3), biopsy proven aggressive transformation of indolent lymphoma (TRIL)] underwent Allo-SCT. All patients were in a chemosensitive remission at time of transplantation. The conditioning regimen was BU-CY in the majority (36 or 88%) of patients and 3 patients had reduced intensity transplantation (RIC) with fludarabine-based regimens. GVHD prophylaxis was cyclosporine and methotrexate until 2009 and was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil after that. Alemtuzumab was used in matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants in 5 (12%) cases. Results There were 22 (54%) males and 19 (46%) females. The median age at BMT was 48 years (range: 20–65). Fifteen (37%) had DLBCL, 19 (46%) had TRIL and 7 (17%) had FL3. Fifteen (37%) patients had received 2 or less lines of chemotherapy and 26 (63%) had received more than 2 lines of therapy at time of transplantation. The median number of chemo regimens was 3 (range: 1–7). The chemotherapy regimens included prior anthracyclines in 40 (98%), prior platinum in 26 (63%) and prior mini BEAM in 19 (46%). Six (15%) patients had received Rituximab and 9 (22%) had received prior RT. Seven (17%) patients had prior ASCT. Thirty-five (85%) of patients received matched related donor transplant whereas 5 (12%) received MUD transplant. The graft source was bone marrow in 33 (80%) and peripheral blood stem cells in 8 (20%). Grade 1–2 acute GVHD was seen in 53% and grade 3–4 in 9%. Chronic GVHD was seen in 51% patients. With a median follow up of 49 months and 96 months in those who are alive, five (12%) patients have relapsed, 20 (49%) patients are alive and in remission. Non relapse mortality (NRM) was 16/41 (39%) and predominantly related to infection. The overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of the entire cohort at 60 months was 55% (Fig-1). Patients, who had achieved CR pre-allo-SCT (compared to PR) had a statistically significantly improved PFS and OS (100% survival for those who were in CR). In multivariate analysis, number of chemotherapy regimens (≤2) was associated with improved OS (p=0.015) and presence of chronic GVHD showed a trend towards significant OS (p=0.052) Conclusions With a median follow up of 96 months in survivors, myeloablative allo-SCT is associated with durable remission in patients with chemosensitive AG-NHL. Results are less favourable in patients who have received multiple prior regimens. NRM remains a significant concern with myeloablative regimens. We believe there is a role for myeloablative regimens and research should focus on ways to reduce NRM in this setting. Disclosures: Gupta: Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide and Melphalan As Conditioning Regimen for Pediatric Patients with AML in 1st or 2nd CR: A Retrospective Analysis from the AIEOP HSCT Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111805 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2106-2106

Author(s):

Annalisa Ruggeri ◽

Marco Zecca ◽

Franca Fagioli ◽

Adriana Balduzzi ◽

Mattia Algeri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Pediatric Patients ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Disease Status ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Donor Type

Abstract Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is largely adopted as post-remissional therapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) but with high-risk characteristics (including high-risk cytogenetics or high levels of minimal residual disease at the end of induction therapy) or to rescue patients reaching CR2 after a previous relapse. Busulfan-based regimens represent the standard of care for these patients in association with alkylating agents. One of the most frequent drugs combination used in Europe in pediatric patients is Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide and Melphan (BuCyMel), which provide a potent anti-leukemic effect, despite remarkable extramedullary toxicities, especially in adolescents. We aimed at analyzing the results of children with AML receiving BuCyMel and reported to the AIEOP registry from 2008 to 2015. A total of 182 patients were reported by 15 transplant centers. Median age at HSCT was 9 years (range 0.3-18); 100 patients (55%) were male. Disease status at HSCT was CR1 in 159 (88%) patients and CR2 in the remaining 23 (12%). All patients received the same myeloablative conditioning regimen with BuCyMel and GVHD prophylaxis was mainly based on calcineurin inhibitors, with the addition of methotrexate in unrelated donors recipients. In vivo T-cell depletion/modulation with ATG was used in 90 cases (49.5%). In almost all cases, pharmacokinetics monitoring of Busulfan was performed, with the drug dosage adjusted according to the systemic exposure evaluated after the first dose. Donor type was an HLA-matched family donor (MFD) in 82 (45%) patients and an unrelated donor (UD) in 100 (55%); 154 (85%) patients received bone marrow (BM) as stem cell source, while the remaining patients (15%) were transplanted with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). Median follow up for surviving patients was 39 months (range 1-111). All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV and grade III-IV aGVHD was 35% (95%CI 28-42) and 11% (95% CI 7-16), respectively. The CI of aGVHD was not different according to the type of donor, being 37% (95%CI 28-50) and 32% (95%CI 24-46) in MFD and UD, respectively (p=0.38). The CI of chronic GVHD at 3 years was 17% (95%CI 12-24), while that of extensive cGVHD was 6% (95%CI 3-10). No difference was found in the CI of CGVHD according to the donor employed (MFD 15% and UD 19%, p=0.49). Overall, the CI of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 3 years was 18% (95%CI 12-26) and 15% (95%CI 10-22), respectively. The CI of relapse and NRM was significantly different according to age at HSCT (using 12 years as cut-off): (Relapse age<12y: 21% (95%CI 15-32) and age>12y: 11% (95%CI 3-32), (p=0.003); NRM age<12y: 10% (95%CI 5-20) and age>12y: 24% (95%CI 15-37), (p=0.005). According to disease status at HSCT the CI of relapse and NRM were as follows: Relapse: CR1: 18% (95%CI 18-26), CR2 15% (95%CI 5-41) p=0.90) and NRM CR1: 14% (95%CI 9-21), CR2 19% (95%CI 8-46) p=0.38). Also, there was no difference in relapse and NRM by donor type, relapse: MFD 16% (95%CI 9-28), UD 19% (95%CI 11-32) p=0.38) NRM: MFD 19% (95%CI 11-34), UD 11% (95%CI 7-20) p=0.62). Causes of deaths were disease recurrence (39%), infections (27%), and GVHD (12%). Three- years overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 74% (95%CI 67-81) and 68% (95%CI 60-70). DFS was 70% (95%CI 60-77) and 67% (95%CI 47-87) for patients transplanted in CR1 and CR2 respectively, (p=0.39); and was 70% (95%CI 59-81) and 65% (95%CI 53-78), p=0.77, for UD and MFD HSCT recipients, respectively. In conclusion, our results confirm the efficacy of BuCyMel in preventing relapse in a large series of pediatric patients affected by AML in CR1 and CR2. Adolescents represent a population of more fragile patients at risk of developing transplant-related fatalities. Optimization of toxicity profile and supportive care could further improve outcomes. Prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted to assess the best conditioning regimen for children and adolescents with AML. Disclosures Zecca: Chimerix: Honoraria. Locatelli:Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Morbidity and Mortality Experienced By Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) - a Report from BMTSS-2

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.823.823 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 823-823

Author(s):

Jessica Wu ◽

Yanjun Chen ◽

Lindsey Hageman ◽

Can-Lan Sun ◽

Liton F. Francisco ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Chronic Health Conditions ◽

Health Conditions ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Chronic Health ◽

Life Threatening ◽

Related Mortality

Abstract Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have become the treatment of choice for CML. However, the high cost and need for life-long treatment contribute to non-adherence and represent a major challenge in their use. Allogeneic HCT is potentially curative, but the very long-term health of the survivors is not known. It is also not clear whether a subgroup of CML patients carries a relatively low risk of long-term morbidity. Methods: We addressed these gaps by studying long-term outcomes in 637 CML patients treated with allogeneic HCT between 1981 and 2010 at City of Hope or Univ MN, and surviving for at least 2y after HCT (median follow-up: 16.7y from HCT); 80% of the cohort was <45y at HCT; 68% received HCT in 1st chronic phase (CP); 63% received matched related [MRD], 34% matched unrelated donor (MUD) and 3% non-myeloablative HCTs; 79% received TBI; 65.8% developed chronic GvHD. Vital status information was collected as of May, 2016, using medical records, National Death Index and Lexis Nexis. US mortality rates were obtained from CDC's National Center for Health Statistics. Thirty percent (n=192) died after having survived at least 2 years after HCT; median time between HCT and death was 8.3y. Of the 445 patients alive at study, 288 (65%) completed the BMTSS health questionnaire used to examine the risk of CTCAE grade 3 (severe) or 4 (life-threatening) chronic health conditions. A sibling comparison group (n=404) also completed the BMTSS questionnaire. Results: Late Mortality: Overall survival was 72.1% at 20y and 69.9% at 30y from HCT. The 20y cumulative incidence of relapse-related mortality was 3.9% (95% CI, 2.6-5.8%) and of non-relapse-related mortality was 18.2% (95% CI, 19.8-28.1%) (Figure 1). 20y cumulative incidence of mortality by cause of death was as follows: infection (7%), chronic GvHD (6%), subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs: 3%). HCT recipients were at 4.4-fold increased risk of death (95% CI, 3.8-5.1, p<0.0001) than age-, race-, and sex-adjusted normal populations. For patients transplanted in 1st CP and surviving 15y, mortality rates became comparable with the general population (SMR, 1.5, 95% CI, 0.9-2.3, p=0.1). Among CML patients receiving HCT at <45y with Bu/Cy (n=70), overall survival was 81.5% at 20y from HCT; the 20y cumulative incidence of relapse-related mortality was 2.9% and of non-relapse-related mortality was 14%. This cohort was at 3.3-fold higher risk of death when compared with the general population (95% CI=1.7-5.7, p<0.0001). Late Morbidity: The 20y cumulative incidence of a severe/life-threatening chronic health condition among HCT survivors was 47.2% (95% CI, 39.0-54.9%); the incidence was higher (p=0.0006) for MUD vs. MRD recipients (Figure 2). After adjusting for age, sex, race and SES, HCT survivors were at 2.7-fold higher risk for severe/life-threatening chronic health conditions as compared with siblings (95% CI, 1.8-3.9, p<0.0001). The 20y cumulative incidence of specific conditions experienced by survivors and siblings were: SMNs (10.1% vs. 1.7%, p<0.001); diabetes (11.1% vs. 1.5%, p<0.001) and coronary artery disease (6.9% vs. 3.2%, p<0.001). CML patients receiving MRD HCT at <45y with Bu/Cy were not at increased risk of severe/life-threatening chronic health conditions when compared with the sibling comparison group (HR=0.81, 95% CI, 0.26-2.54, p=0.7). Conclusions: Conditional on surviving the first 2y after HCT, the overall survival exceeds 70% at 20y and remains stable at 70% at 30y after HCT. Non-relapse related mortality (infections, chronic GvHD, SMNs) is by far the major contributor to the late mortality. Conditional on surviving the first 15y, mortality rates are similar to those observed in the general population. HCT survivors are at a 2.7-fold higher risk of severe/life-threatening morbidity when compared with siblings. The more common morbidities include SMNs, diabetes and coronary artery disease. However, CML patients receiving HCT at <45y with Bu/Cy conditioning enjoy survival rates exceeding 81% at 20y from HCT, and their burden of long-term morbidity is comparable to that experienced by siblings. These findings could help inform decisions regarding therapeutic options for management of CML. Disclosures Snyder: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Forman:Mustang Therpapeutics: Other: Construct licensed by City of Hope.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia - a Single Institution Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128985 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5739-5739

Author(s):

Hamza Hashmi ◽

Jeffrey Lancet ◽

Asmita Mishra ◽

Kendra L. Sweet ◽

Rami S. Komrokji ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Disease Status ◽

Promyelocytic Leukemia ◽

Single Institution ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Total Body

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) have improved; however, a number of patients, particularly those with high-risk APL, still relapse despite all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic-based therapies. We present single institution outcomes of autologous (auto) and allogenic (allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with relapsed APL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes in patients with relapsed APL who underwent either auto- or allo- HCT at Moffitt Cancer Center from 1990 to 2018 utilizing the clinical data obtained from BMT Research & Analysis Information Network (BRAIN). Survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: Autologous HCT Cohort: A total of 15 received auto-HCT with a median age at HCT of 39 (range, 21-60) years. Disease status at HCT were first complete remission (CR1) in 5 (33%) and CR2 in 10 (67%). Majority of patients (13/15, 87%) received busulfan/cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy) conditioning and remaining (2/15, 13%) Bu/Cy/etoposide. All (n=15) patients received peripheral blood (PB) stem cell grafts. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11 (range, 10-14) days and platelet recovery was 14 (range 9-44) days. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for auto HCT was 12.9 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-24.8) months. With a median follow up of 45.1 months for surviving patients, overall survival (OS) for auto HCT was 12.9 (95%CI: 0-27.8) years. At the time analysis, 8 patients were relapse-free. Allogeneic HCT Cohort: A total of 10 patients received allo HCT with a median age of 46 (range, 22-56) years at HCT. Disease status at allo HCT was CR2 in 2, CR3 in 6, and two had refractory disease. Two patients had prior auto HCT. Donor type was HLA-identical sibling=5; one antigen-mismatched sibling=1; HLA-matched unrelated donor=3; related haploidentical=1. Seven patients received peripheral blood graft and 3 received bone marrow graft. Conditioning regimen intensity was myeloablative in 7 (fludarabine/busulfan +/- anti-thymocyte globulin=3; Bu/Cy=3; cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation=1), and reduced intensity in 3 (fludarabine/melphalan=2; fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation=1). Seven patients received tacrolimus-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Median time of neutrophil engraftment was 15 (range, 12-22) days, and platelet engraftment was 22 (range, 15-28) days. The median PFS for allo HCT was 11.9 (95%CI: 2.1-21.6) months. With a median follow up of 48.2 months for surviving patients, median OS for allo HCT was 12.4 (95%CI: 4.8-19.9) months. At the time of analysis 4 patients were relapse-free. CONCLUSIONS: In our single center analysis, auto HCT for APL resulted in a durable remission and prolonged survival. Outcomes after allo HCT were suboptimal primarily due to their heavily pretreated condition and chemotherapy resistant disease. Further research on novel conditioning regimen and relapse prevention is needed to improve the outcomes of allo HCT in APL. Figure Disclosures Lancet: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Sweet:Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding; Stemline: Consultancy; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Komrokji:JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; JAZZ: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy. Bejanyan:Kiadis Pharma: Other: advisory board. List:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nishihori:Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Comparative Study of Treosulfan Plus Fludarabine (FT14) with Busulfan Plus Fludarabine (FB4) for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First or Second Complete Remission: An Analysis from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146303 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1787-1787

Author(s):

Eleni Gavriilaki ◽

Ioanna Sakellari ◽

Myriam Labopin ◽

Urpu Salmenniemi ◽

Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽

Lower Percentage ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Blood And Marrow Transplantation ◽

Unrelated Donors

Abstract Background: Treosulfan has been increasingly used in reduced toxicity regimens, especially in older or frail patients. Different doses of treosulfan plus fludarabine have shown an advantage over reduced intensity regimens, confirmed by a randomized phase 3 trial utilizing treosulfan 30 g/m² (or FT10) in the majority of patients. However, data comparing fludarabine with higher doses of treosulfan (FT14) to fludarabine combined with myeloablative doses of busulfan are limited. Aims: We compared outcomes between treatment alternatives of similar conditioning intensity: FT14 (fludarabine 150 or 160 mg/m 2 and treosulfan 42g/m 2, or FT14) over FB4 (fludarabine 150 or 160 mg/m 2 and busulfan 12.8 mg/kg). Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive patients from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry, meeting the following inclusion criteria: a) adults diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), b) recipients of first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from a matched unrelated or sibling donor between 2010-2020, c) HSCT at first or second complete remission (CR), d) conditioning regimen with either FT14 or FB4. Patients with ex vivo manipulated grafts were excluded. A sub-group analysis was performed according to age (<55 years or ≥55 years). Results: In total, 2703 patients were included in the analysis comprising 2025 (75%) transplanted with FB4, and 678 (25%) with FT14. In the sub-group of patients younger than 55 years (n=1676), FT14 recipients (n=236) had a significantly increased age (p<0.001), higher rates of secondary AML (p<0.0001), unrelated donors (p<0.0001), and peripheral blood grafts (p=0.026), but a lower percentage of female donors to male recipients (p=0.008), compared to FB4 recipients (n=1440). Cumulative incidence (CI) of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade III-IV was higher in FT14 (9.3% versus 5.8%, p=0.044), but rates of chronic GVHD were similar. With a median follow-up of 24.4 months (range 23.4-25.6), 2-year CI of relapse was higher in FT14 (35.9% versus 27.5%, p=0.025, Figure 1A), while non-relapse mortality was similar between groups (NRM 11.9% versus 7.7%, p=0.28, 1B). This led to lower 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS 52.2% versus 62.4%, p=0.002, 1C), overall survival (OS 63.2% versus 72.9%, p=0.038, 1D), and GVHD free, relapse free survival (GRFS 41.3% versus 50%, p=0.004) in FT14. In Cox-regression multivariate analysis, conditioning regimen remained an independent predictor of CI of relapse (p=0.011), and LFS (p=0.03). Similar differences in patient characteristics were observed in patients aged ≥55 years (n=1027). FT14 recipients (n=442) had a significantly increased age (p<0.001), higher rates of secondary AML (p<0.0001), unrelated donors (p<0.0001), adverse cytogenetics (p<0.0001), peripheral blood grafts (p=0.026), but a lower percentage of female to male combinations (p=0.008) compared to FB4 (n=585). Cumulative incidence (CI) of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV was higher in FT14 (7.6% versus 6.5%, p=0.001), with similar rates of chronic GVHD. Nevertheless, with a median follow-up of 29.6 months (range 23.9-34.1), 2-year CI of relapse, NRM, as well as LFS, OS and GFRS were similar between groups. Conclusion: With the limitations of a retrospective analysis, our large real-world multicenter study suggests that FB4 is associated with better outcomes compared to FT14 in younger patients with AML transplanted in first or second CR. The same was not true for older patients (≥55 years). It should also be noted that FT14 has been selected by treating physicians for higher risk HSCT, including patients who are older, have secondary disease, adverse cytogenetics, and unrelated donors. Therefore, further studies are needed to determine the optimal conditioning regimen for such patient populations. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gavriilaki: Alexion, Omeros, Sanofi Corporation: Consultancy; Gilead Corporation: Honoraria; Pfizer Corporation: Research Funding. Labopin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Yakoub-Agha: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Hilgendorf: Novartis: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Celgene: Other: Travel Support; SanofiGenzyme: Other: Travel Support. Kröger: Novartis: Research Funding; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Pharma: Honoraria. Mielke: Gilead/KITE: Other: Travel support, Expert panel ; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Immunicum: Other: Data safety monitoring board; Miltenyi: Other: Data safety monitoring board; DNA Prime SA: Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Speakers Bureau. Zuckerman: AbbVie: Honoraria; Orgenesis Inc.: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BioSight Ltd: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Cellect Biotechnology: Honoraria. Giebel: Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Bazarbachi: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Hikma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spyridonidis: Menarini: Current Employment. Mohty: Astellas: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Reduced-Intensity Conditioning (RIC) Regimens for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (alloHCT) in Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (NHL)-a Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-121849 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 319-319

Author(s):

Nilanjan Ghosh ◽

Sairah Ahmed ◽

Carlos Litovich ◽

Kwang Woo Ahn ◽

Manoj Khanal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Conditioning Regimens ◽

The Impact ◽

Reduced Intensity

Introduction: Reduced-intensity and non-myeloablative (RIC/NMA) conditioning regimens are frequently used in alloHCT for NHL, because they are associated with decreased non-relapse mortality (NRM) risk in comparison with myeloablative conditioning regimens and allow older patients and patients with comorbidities to receive alloHCT. However, the optimal RIC/NMA regimen in allo-HCT for NHL is not known. Using the CIBMTR database we compared the transplant outcomes between the commonly used RIC/NMA regimens in NHL. Methods: 1823 adult (≥18 years) NHL patients in CIBMTR registry undergoing alloHCT using matched related or unrelated donors, between 2008-2016 were included. Analysis was limited to patients receiving four commonly used RIC/NMA regimens: fludarabine/ i.v. busulfan (6.4mg/kg) (Flu/Bu), fludarabine/melphalan (140mg/m^2) (Flu/Mel 140), fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (Fly/Cy) and Flu/Cy with 2Gy Total Body Irradiation (Flu/Cy/TBI). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was limited to calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens. Patients who received post transplantation cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included cumulative incidence of NRM, relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) and cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD. Probabilities of OS and PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Multivariable regression analysis was performed for GVHD, relapse/progression, NRM, PFS, and OS. Covariates with a p<0.01 were considered significant. Results: The study cohort was divided into 4 groups; Flu/Bu (n=458), Flu/Cy/TBI (n=89), Flu/Mel 140 (n=885) and Flu/Cy (n=391). The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The 4 cohorts were comparable with respect to median patient age, gender, donor type, remission status at alloHCT, and use of prior auto HCT. There was no interaction between NHL histological subtype and type of conditioning regimen. Results of multivariate analysis are shown in Table 2. The Flu/Mel 140 regimen was associated with a higher NRM (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.37-2.31; p<0.001) when compared to Flu/Bu. Although the risk of relapse with Flu/Mel 140 was lower when compared to Flu/Bu (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.94); p=0.007), this did not result in an improvement in PFS. Moreover, the Flu/Mel 140 cohort had an inferior OS (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.13-1.59; p<0.001) when compared to Flu/Bu. There was no significant difference in terms of OS, PFS, relapse and NRM between Flu/Bu, Flu/Cy and Flu/Cy/TBI. There was no difference in risk of grade 3-4 acute GVHD across the four cohorts and compared to Flu/Cy/TBI, Flu/Mel 140 had a higher risk of chronic GVHD (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.15-1.65; p<0.001). Four year adjusted PFS was 38% for Flu/Bu, 51% for Flu/Cy/TBI, 39% for Flu/Mel 140 and 35% for Flu/Cy (p=0.07). Four year adjusted OS was 58% for Flu/Bu, 67% for Flu/Cy/TBI, 49% for Flu/Mel 140 and 63% for Flu/Cy (p<0.001). Disease relapse was the most common cause of death across all 4 cohorts. Conclusion: This is the largest analysis comparing the impact of various RIC/NMA conditioning regimens on the outcomes of NHL patients undergoing alloHCT. We report that the choice of RIC/NMA conditioning regimen significantly impacted OS. The most commonly used conditioning regimen, Flu/Mel 140 was associated with a higher NRM and an inferior OS. The Flu/Bu, Flu/Cy, and Flu/CY/TBI conditioning regimens appear to provide comparable OS. Disclosures Ghosh: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; SGN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kharfan-Dabaja:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Sureda:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Hamadani:Merck: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Otsuka: Research Funding; Medimmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Effect of Age on Outcomes of Allogeneic Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146334 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3933-3933

Author(s):

Audrey M. Sigmund ◽

Justin Jiang ◽

Qiuhong Zhao ◽

Patrick Elder ◽

Ashley E. Rosko ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Older Patients ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) has become an increasingly important consolidation treatment option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and as upfront therapy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Although the median age at diagnosis for both diseases is above 65 years, studies evaluating allo-SCT as treatment option for patients aged 65 years or older are limited. Further, as the population ages, the number of patients above 65 years considered for allo-SCT will continue to rise. Thus, the aim of our current investigation was to analyze outcomes based on age in AML/MDS patients <65 years old and ≥65 years old who received allo-SCT at the Ohio State University. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for all AML/MDS patients who received allo-SCT between January 1984 and December 2018 at our institution. Primary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS was counted from the day of transplantation to relapse or death. OS was defined as survival from the day of allo-SCT until death from any cause, with censoring of patients known to be alive at the time of last follow-up. PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan Meier Curves. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Cumulative incidence rates of aGVHD, cGVHD, relapse, NRM were estimated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks. Results: The cohort consisted of 900 AML/MDS patients, with 150 patients ≥65 years and 750 patients <65 years. The median age at transplant for the <65 years group was 49 years (range: 18-64 years) and 68 years (range: 65-76 years) for the ≥65 years group. Gender, race, Karnofsky score, and comorbidity index were similar between the two groups. A higher proportion of patients received myeloablative (MA) conditioning (65.1%) in the <65 years of age compared to 20% in the ≥65 years of age (p<0.01). A higher proportion of older patients had matched unrelated donors (57.3%), and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens (80%). The median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 176 days (range: 55-4920) for age <65 years and 168 days (range: 34-6079 days) for age ≥65 years. Median follow-up from allo-SCT was 5.9 years (range 0.8-35.9 years) and 3.4 years (range: 1.0-9.6 years) from transplantation among survivors. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were similar among the groups (p=0.35; 0.11). 3 year OS of 42.3% (95% CI: 38.7-45.8%) and PFS of 38.3% (95% CI: 34.8%-41.9%) were observed for age <65 years. The corresponding OS and PFS for age ≥65 years was 46.3% (95% CI: 37.9%-54.3%) and 43.0% (95% CI: 34.7%-51.0%), respectively (Figure 1a & 1b). Cumulative incidences of relapse at 1 year in <65 and ≥65 years were 26.4% and 25.3%, respectively (p=0.43). The cumulative incidence of NRM at 1 year in <65 and ≥65 years was 23.2% and 17.3%, respectively (p=0.12; Figures 1c and d). The incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were similar in the two age groups. The cumulative incidence of aGVHD at day 100 in <65 and ≥65 years was 40.3% (95% CI: 36.4%-44.2%) and 43.0% (95% CI: 34.9%-50.7%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of cGVHD at day 365 in <65 and ≥65 years was 40.8% (95% CI: 36.9%-44.6%) and 41.6% (95% CI: 33.6%-49.4%), respectively. Conclusion: Overall, our study suggests similar outcomes for elderly patients undergoing allo-HCT as compared to their counterparts, which is in line with prior studies. This likely is due to advancements in the transplant field, including the development of RIC and alternative donors, which have allowed greater access to transplant for older adults. Utilization of allo-HCT is feasible and should be considered for AML/MDS patients ≥65 years. Further research is underway to evaluate the important determinants of health status in older patients undergoing allo-HCT and to ultimately help predict NRM (BMT CTN 1704). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bumma: Amgen, Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi: Consultancy. Vasu: Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski: Takeda: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mims: Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Consultancy; Glycomemetics: Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Daiichi-Saynko: Consultancy. Brammer: Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy. Saad: Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; careDx: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; OrcaBio: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy. de Lima: Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Low Incidence Of Severe Cgvhd and Late NRM In a Phase II Trial Of Thymoglobulin®, Tacrolimus and Sirolimus For Gvhd Prevention

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.5471.5471 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 5471-5471

Author(s):

Zaid Al-Kadhimi ◽

Alireza Eghtedar ◽

Zartash Gul ◽

Wei Chen ◽

Daryn Smith ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase Ii ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Bronchiolitis Obliterans ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Performance Status ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Low Incidence ◽

Nih Consensus Criteria

Abstract Introduction Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a major factor determining long term outcome and quality of life following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHSCT). In fact, cGVHD is the leading cause of late non-relapse mortality (NRM) and morbidity after AHSCT. The rates of severe cGVHD using NIH consensus criteria reported in the literature are 15-38%. Effective regimens are needed to reduce the severity of cGVHD and improve NRM. We analyzed and updated the long term outcomes of our phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy of intermediate dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (Thymo) in combination with tacrolimus and sirolimus for the prevention of acute and chronic GVHD after unrelated donor transplantation. Methods In a Phase II trial, 47 adult patients (pts) underwent AHSCT from unrelated donors using Thymo, tacrolimus, and sirolimus for GVHD prophylaxis. Thymo was given as follows: 0.5 mg/kg day -3, 1.5mg/kg day -2, and 2.5mg/kg day -1. Chronic GVHD was measured using NIH consensus criteria. Results Twenty-two pts received 8/8 and 25 received 7/8 HLA matched unrelated grafts. Thirteen pts received a reduced intensity preparative regimen, while 34 pts received a full intensity regimen. The median follow-up duration was 45.2 months (95% CI 37.7-48.8), with minimum follow up of 30 months. At 4 years of follow up, the cumulative incidence of NIH severe cGVHD a, was 6.4 % (95% CI 1.6-15.9), and overall cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 48.9% (95% CI 33.6-62.6). Of 20 pts who are alive and disease free, only 4 pts continue to need systemic immune suppression at the last follow up. At 4 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of NRM and disease relapse were 27.7% (95% CI 15.7- 41.0) and 30.0% (95% CI 17.5- 43.6), respectively. There has been one non relapse death beyond 12 months and none after 18 months of follow up. Only one pt died from cGVHD and bronchiolitis obliterans, while two other pts had minimal symptoms from bronchiolitis obliterans. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2 years were 50% (95% CI 35-64) and 56% (95% CI 42-70). Median OS is 33.9 months [95% CI (9.8 -*) *the upper limit of the CI was not calculated due to the pattern of censoring] All patients were censored after 40 months, so PFS and OS could not be calculated at 48 months. The median karnofsky performance status at 2 years was 90%. Conclusion At long term follow up, the combination of Thymoglobulin, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus was associated with low incidence of severe cGVHD, low incidence of late NRM, and good performance status. Further validation of these results in randomized phase III trials is needed. Disclosures: Al-Kadhimi: Genzyme: Research Funding. Off Label Use: The use of Thymoglobulin® for GVHD prevention.

Download Full-text